The present invention relates to a system and method of determining the remaining life of a centrifugal turbomachinery impeller. A centrifugal turbomachine may include one or more pump, turbine, or compressor impellers.
Centrifugal turbomachinery typically operate at high shaft speeds for best aerodynamic performance. At design speed the highest stresses approach yield strength of the materials typically used in this application, such as aluminum alloys. Generally, this can be accepted if the operating stress is steady, for example, fixed speed.
Turbomachinery equipment can be expected to operate either in a relatively steady mode at fixed speed or with variable speed. An example of a variable speed application is an air compressor that must produce a maximum pressure and then stop or return to idle mode at a lower speed to save energy. A typical idle speed is 30% of design speed where power is reduce to 3% of maximum power. The stresses in the impeller vary by the square of the speed.
When subjected to many start and stop cycles or random excursions in speed, the material can degrade and fail from fatigue. The life curve is a function of stress ratio, which is defined as the minimum stress divided by the maximum stress. Mean stress is the average of the maximum stress and the minimum stress. The amplitude for a given stress cycle is the maximum stress minus the minimum stress divided by two. The material strength also reduces with increasing temperature. If sufficient cycles are accumulated, the material cracks at the highest stress location and fails catastrophically due to the high mean stress from centrifugal loading. In practice, the speed can cycle from any minimum value to the maximum in a somewhat random nature depending upon the application. It is advantageous to predict with reasonable accuracy when the point of catastrophic failure may occur.
This invention relates to centrifugal turbomachinery including one or more impellers. A speed sensor is arranged to detect a speed associated with an impeller rotational speed. A temperature sensor is arranged to detect a temperature associated with an impeller exit temperature. A controls system has impeller parameters, which include the impeller speed and exit temperature. A calculation methodology is used to mathematically manipulate the impeller parameters to determine a remaining life of the impeller. A programmed response, such as a warning indication, is triggered by the control system in response to the remaining life reaching a threshold.
In operation, the controls system monitors the speed and temperature of the impeller. The controls system iteratively calculates the remaining life based upon the speed and the temperature. In one example, a change in remaining life is calculated in response to a change in speed that results in an impeller stress that exceeds the endurance strength for the impeller.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
A centrifugal turbomachine 10 is shown schematically in
The inventive centrifugal turbomachine 10 includes a speed sensor 22 for detecting a speed of the impeller 16. The speed sensor 22 either directly or indirectly detects the rotational speed of the impeller 16. A temperature sensor 24 is arranged to detect an exit temperature associated with the impeller 16. In the example shown, the temperature sensor 24 is arranged near an exit of the impeller 16.
A controls system includes a controller 26 communicating with the speed sensor 22 and temperature sensor 24. The controller 26 may communicate with other transducers. Additionally, the controller 26 may receive and store other impeller parameters, such as those relating to material properties of the impeller and stress characteristics of the impeller. The stress characteristics may be provided as an output from a finite element analysis model of the impeller 16 and/or tables.
Stress characteristics may include maximum impeller stress as a function of speed, fatigue strength as a function of temperature, stress ratio, cycles to fatigue failure, and fatigue strength modification factors. The stress characteristics may be provided as part of a lookup table or any other suitable means, as is well known in the art. Fatigue strength modification factors may include information relating to the surface finish of the impeller, size of particular features of the impeller, load on particular areas of the impeller and temperature of the impeller. The impeller parameters may be determined empirically or mathematically.
For the example centrifugal turbomachine shown in
The loss of strength of a common aluminum alloy as a function of fluctuating stress and fatigue life cycles is shown in
The parameters that are desirable to continuously monitor are the impeller speed and impeller exit temperature. The maximum impeller stress is determined from finite element analysis, for example, as a function of speed, which is indicated in
The monitored data, and impeller stress characteristics, material properties and calculating methodology may be programmed into the controller 26 and included as part of the controls system for the centrifugal turbomachine 10. In one example, the results of the calculations are used to trigger a warning indication such as a visual or audio alarm if the accumulated cycles approach the alarm limit or the number of allowable cycles prior to failure. Allowable cycles are typically established using a desired safety factor suitable for the particular application.
An alarm warning can be set at less than the alarm limit, such as a percent. Upon reaching the warning threshold, the control system can prevent speed excursions until the unit can be scheduled for shutdown and impeller replacement. This approach is taken because preventing speed excursions prevents accumulative damage to the impeller.
Upon reaching the alarm limit, the unit is shut down for impeller replacement. Alternatively, the unit may be allowed to operate continuously at full speed to avoid any fluctuating stresses until shutdown can be conveniently scheduled. In this manner, the customer can be forewarned to replace the impeller before actual failure.
In operation, a methodology similar to the example shown in
The resulting stress for a change in speed is calculated at block 36 to determine whether the stress exceeds the endurance strength for infinite life of the impeller. If the stress exceeds the endurance strength, then the reduction in life of the impeller is calculated, as indicated at block 38. In one example calculation methodology, the number of cycles (Nf) corresponding to the stress cycle produced by the change in speed is calculated. Nf will be a function of the maximum speed, N1, and the stress ratio, rS.
Note that Nf is a function of the stress ratio, rs.
rs=min stress÷max stress
Or, given that stress varies as the square of speed:
rs=(N2÷N1)2
If speed of rotation is being monitored over time, the accumulation of stress cycles can be counted and an estimate made of the remaining life, as indicated at block 38. For example, starting with an initial value for the life variable, L=0, for each stress cycle:
At any point in time, L is the portion of the expected life logged by the impeller.
In one example, a typical day's operation consist of ramping from rest to a maximum speed of 60000 rpm, shuttling between that maximum and a minimum speed of 20000 rpm four times total and returning to rest. The temperature starts at ambient and rises to a maximum of 300 degrees F. The fatigue strength modification factors are:
At the end of the day, the accumulative L value says that 0.072% of the expected life has been used up and if typical, another 1/0.000720=1389 days=3.8 years might be expected.
When the remaining life reaches a threshold, the controller 26 may activate a warning indication, which may include a visual and/or audible warning, as indicated in block 42. Alternatively, the remaining life may simply be stored or displayed in an accessible manner to be checked periodically by service personnel. The service personnel may then replace the impeller before failure, as indicated at block 44. The method 30 is iteratively repeated to calculate subsequent reductions in life of the impeller due to changes in speed.
Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3584507 | Hohenberg | Jun 1971 | A |
3950985 | Buchwald et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4046002 | Murphy et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4057714 | Fork et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4112747 | Aldridge et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4129037 | Toalson | Dec 1978 | A |
4135246 | McMannis | Jan 1979 | A |
4151740 | Havstad | May 1979 | A |
4733529 | Nelson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4796465 | Carreno et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4854120 | Nelson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4908775 | Palusamy et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4954974 | Howell, IV et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5042295 | Seeley | Aug 1991 | A |
5447059 | Miller et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5533413 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5654500 | Herron et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5680310 | Morgan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5726891 | Sisson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5913184 | Girbig | Jun 1999 | A |
6209390 | LaRue et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247900 | Archibald et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6282882 | Dudd, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6343251 | Herron et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6490543 | Jaw | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506010 | Yeung et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523999 | Ishii et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526356 | DiMaggio et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6711952 | Leamy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719526 | Sanborn et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7104120 | Gladden | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20030028332 | DiMaggio et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040060371 | Barkhoudarian | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060228214 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |