This disclosure relates to improved aftertreatment performance. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to optimizing vehicle engine and transmission operations to improve passive regeneration of the diesel particulate filter and reduce engine exhaust particulate matter.
Governments have been imposing progressive mandates for reducing amounts of particulate matter (PM) in exhaust emissions. The diesel particulate matter filter (DPF) has been developed for exhaust aftertreatment systems to remove diesel particulate matter containing soot, unburned fuel, lubrication oil etc. from the exhaust gas.
A DPF typically includes a filter encased in a canister that is positioned in the diesel exhaust stream. The filter is designed to collect PM while allowing exhaust gases to pass through it. Types of DPFs include ceramic and silicon carbide materials, fiber wound cartridges, knitted fiber silica coils, wire mesh and sintered metals. DPFs have demonstrated reductions in PM by up to 90% or more, and can be used together with a DOC to reduce HC, CO, and soluble organic fraction (SOF) of PM in diesel exhaust.
Because a DPF traps soot and other PM, it must be regenerated from time-to-time because the volume of PM generated by a diesel engine is sufficient to fill up and plug a DPF in a relatively short time. The regeneration process burns off or “oxidizes” PM that has accumulated in the filter. However, because diesel exhaust temperatures often are not sufficiently high to burn accumulated PM, various ways to raise the exhaust gas temperature or to lower the oxidation temperature are utilized. Regeneration can be accomplished passively by adding a catalyst to the filter. For example, a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) can be provided upstream of a DPF to oxidize NO to generate NO2 (requiring accurate control to maintain the mass ratio of NO/PM in engine-out exhaust gas), which in turn oxidizes the PM in the downstream DPF. Alternatively, regeneration can be achieved actively by increasing the exhaust temperature through a variety of approaches, a fuel burner, resistive heating coils or late fuel injection.
However, running active DPF regeneration cycles involve injecting energy into the engine system and result in excess fuel use, and thus excess cost. Further, managing the soot load in the DPF in lean burning engine systems to reduce active cycling is difficult because operation of the engine system frequently involves soot producing transients. For instance, transients involving throttling increase fuel amounts in the air to fuel mixture such that the ratio can approach or exceed stoichiometric levels, resulting in excessive PM trapped by the DPF, and consequently requiring more active regeneration cycles.
This disclosure provides a method and system for determining recommendations for powertrain operation that reduce soot production in connection with managing a diesel particulate filter (DPF) of an exhaust aftertreatment system. Recommendations generated reduce excessive particulate matter (PM) production during transient engine events and can provide operating conditions favorable for passive regeneration. In this way, less frequent active regeneration of the DPF is needed and/or more opportunities are provided for passive regeneration.
In one aspect of the disclosure, a method to enhance the passive regeneration of a DPF includes receiving current operating data indicative of a vehicle current operating state based on at least two of power demand, engine speed, engine torque, gear number, and vehicle speed; receiving terrain data indicative of terrain variation; determining a vehicle target operating state based on engine exhaust PM and engine transients; and providing an engine speed and transmission gear shift recommendation based on the vehicle target operating state to reduce at least one of the engine exhaust PM and the engine transients.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a system adapted to enhance the passive regeneration of a DPF includes a current operating state module including current operating state data indicative of a vehicle current operating state based on at least two of power demand, engine speed, engine torque, gear number, and vehicle speed; a terrain variation module including terrain data indicative of terrain variation; a target operating state module containing a vehicle target operating state based on engine exhaust PM and engine transients; and a recommendation module containing engine speed and transmission gear shift recommendations to reduce the engine exhaust PM and the engine transients.
Due to the high cost of active regeneration of the DPF 4, opportunities to either enhance the passive regeneration capabilities or reduce the amount of exhaust particulate matter (PM) from the engine are of significant value. Further, opportunities to perform complete active regenerations are limited, which further increases the need for increased passive regeneration as well as the reduction of engine exhaust PM. The challenge is to optimally run an engine so as to maximize the passive regeneration of a DPF by managing both engine speed and engine transients through powertrain/driveline control, and in the longer run, use the strategy that is most efficient. For instance, a condition may exist in which less efficient operation of the engine (e.g., downshifting to a lower numbered gear to increase engine speed) is more economical because the additional fuel consumed by changing the operating state (i.e., downshifting) may be less than fuel consumed by a regeneration cycle of the DPF 4 otherwise required based on the SLE output if the current operating state is maintained. Thus, optimization of powertrain torque-speed management can include projecting required power for the vehicle operation over a period of time, a distance traveled, or operation window, and determining an optimal operating mode with consideration to fuel consumed by the operating mode and any required regeneration. This is especially useful in engine systems having access to positioning and terrain data, for example, using GPS and terrain/routing map data, and operation in cruise control mode, where required power in a the projected operating window can be readily and accurately estimated.
To optimize vehicle engine and transmission operations to improve passive regeneration of the DPF, applicants introduce a Cycle Efficiency Management (CEM) module. The CEM module employs control processes to furnish an operator with anticipated and currently desired vehicle operational behavior to optimize fuel economy. The CEM control processes focus on powertrain components such as engine, transmission, exhaust aftertreatment devices, accessories, final drive, wheels and vehicle. The processes can interface with the operator to provide guidance as to appropriate vehicle speed/power targets and transmission gear selection targets. The CEM module is useful in conditioning an operator to optimize behavior based on certain performance criteria.
As shown in
Communications module 150 can include a GPS unit 152 to receive position data to determine coordinate positioning, and/or to supply data in advance of an operation or forthcoming positions or in real-time as the vehicle is operated and route traversed. Embodiments can provide for road terrain data to be maintained in computer storage and downloaded to CEM module 70 prior to the start of a trip or transmitted wirelessly over-the-air at any time, for example, by using cellular technology. The positioning information provided by GPS unit 152 can be used by operator interface module 140 and/or the road terrain and routing module 130 to determine where the vehicle is on a route, the current road conditions, and to predict future road conditions and related engine speed and fueling/torque requirements.
CEM module 70 can receive information from ECM 60, engine parameter/operating conditions module 120, the road terrain module 130, and/or the operator interface module 140 via communications module 150. The CEM 70 can include or have access to a data from a soot emission model (not shown) that can estimate an amount of soot that would be produced for a particular engine speed and torque. The soot emission model can be included, for example, in the ECM 60. This information can be used by DPF management module 160 to determine whether to recommend to ECM 60 an operating state that optimizes passive regeneration or minimizes soot production while still providing the required power. Further, the recommendation may consider other data, such as routing, projected time of delivery, and/or weather conditions, when determining an operation state to recommend. In an exemplary embodiment, engine transients are minimized by operating the engine in a range, or window of low speeds. Data such as routing, point of departure, destination, allowable travel time etc. can be provided by the operator via the operator interface module (e.g., via a touch screen, display, microphone or other interface device) or communicated to road terrain routing module 130 via communications module 150, for example.
For example, one option that can be considered by DPF management module 160 is translating all immediate upcoming terrain variation directly to engine load using the current transmission gear position, that is, without changing the gear state of the transmission 40.
Another option DPF management module 160 can consider includes considering engine load transients based on a +1/−1 (or similar) gear shift from the current transmission state or engine load transients with cylinder cutout. That is, the effects of an upshift to one or more higher transmission gears or downshift to one or more lower transmission gears can be considered for reducing transients of an upcoming event, or to change a current operating state to a more optimal state (e.g., lower speed) in view of DPF management.
Options for consideration by the DPF management module 160 include considerations made to place the engine 30 in a more oxygen-fuel concentration (OFC) conservative state in preparation for an upcoming transient, such as an increased load, and considerations made to place the future state of the engine 30 to reduce the transient from the current state (on a per cylinder basis).
The forgoing options and others, as well as their combinations, can be used to identify optimal engine-transmission relationships as a function of terrain variation. In an embodiment, these options can be considered with the state of soot loading in the DPF 4, for example, as estimated by the SLE module 165. For example, an amount of allowable soot production during a window of operation can be based in part on the amount of soot present in the DPF. Hence, when considering the available operating options, the allowable margins can change with estimated PM.
In addition to limiting engine transients to mitigate the generation of engine PM, the engine 30 and transmission 40 may also be managed to operate the engine 30 at lower speeds. By operating the engine 30 at lower speeds, passive regeneration opportunities continue to be available for the aftertreatment system to regenerate DPF 4. By shifting the transmission appropriately, the engine may be slowed down (or maintained in a specific speed window) based on current and future expected loads based on the terrain profile.
Additionally, the engine system 10 can maintain a balance between the engine 30 operating closer to its peak brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), which may be achieved at a given engine speed by also cutting out cylinders as appropriate (i.e., cutting fuel, or fuel and air to one or more cylinders such that the remaining cylinders are operating closer to peak BSFC); the exhaust flow rate/temperature; and the ability to provide the desired transient response (such as sudden acceleration) in near future time events.
The engine speed also can be maintained at an overall lower value by shifting the engine governed-speed curve based on the need for more aggressive passive regeneration opportunities. Exemplary embodiments provide a benefit of increased freight efficiency in transporting cargo from source to destination. Inputs to process can also include engine fueling maps and engine braking/friction maps. Additional benefits include reduction of failed active DPF regeneration attempts and improvement in product life/warranty.
Both approaches—limiting engine transients and reducing engine speed—make use of an engine-transmission integrated system, where data in the form of GPS information can be used to supplement the decision making process to consider current and future terrain information. Without the GPS signal, optimal decisions would, in part, be based on the current engine state, throttle command, aftertreatment state and the transmission state. Although not all benefits would be realized, the non-GPS process could still coordinate activities with the transmission to minimize transients and maintain the engine at a relatively low overall operating speed.
In an exemplary embodiment, CEM module 70 performs supervisory DPF management of the engine system 10. In an exemplary embodiment, CEM module 70 can determine whether operator-controlled changes in engine speed and torque, for example, by down-shifting, no-shifting or up-shifting the transmission from its current gear and/or throttle adjustment to a condition favorable for reducing soot production or enhancing passive regeneration. By down-shifting the transmission upon entering an upgrade, for example, the engine can operate at a higher speed while producing the same amount of driveshaft power as with operation at lower speed, and can avoid the excess soot production that would otherwise be produces with increased throttling (fueling) at a lower engine speed. Thus, by generating recommendations for shifting the transmission up or down and/or increasing or decreasing the fueling rate via throttling adjustment, CEM module 70 can offer instruction to the operator during opportunities where more optimal engine out PM operation is possible. Generated recommendations can be indicated to the operator via a visible or audible interface (e.g., display, speaker, etc.).
Additionally, CEM module 70 can generate cost/economy benefit information for historical storage and/or display, for example, via operator interface module 140. This information can be provided as an instantaneous value, as a function development over a window (e.g., a look-ahead window), over an entire trip (source to destination), or to show benefit, cost savings, or performance of any other definable cumulative period.
Exemplary embodiments provide a system adapted to enhance the passive regeneration of a DPF. The system comprises a current operating state module including data indicative of vehicle current operating state based on at least two of power demand, engine speed, engine torque, gear number, and vehicle speed. The system further comprises terrain variation module including data indicative of terrain variation, a target operating state module containing a vehicle target operating state based on engine exhaust PM and engine transients, and a recommendation module containing engine speed and transmission gear shift recommendations in view of reducing said engine exhaust PM and engine transients.
Exemplary embodiments provide a system and method for optimizing vehicle engine and transmission operations to improve passive regeneration of the DPF and reduce engine exhaust PM to be implemented in computer programmable software and stored in tangible computer readable media. Such an embodiment would comprise a computer readable storage medium encoded with computer executable instructions, which when executed by a processor, perform the method for maximizing the passive regeneration of a DPF, as disclosed above.
Many aspects of this disclosure are described in terms of logic units or modules that include sequences of actions to be performed by elements of a control module and/or a network system, which can be a computer system or other hardware capable of executing programmed instructions. These elements can be embodied in a controller of an engine system, such as ECM 60, multiple controllers, or in a controller separate from, and communicating with the ECM 60 or distributed across several modules. In an embodiment, the ECM 60, CEM 70, and other depicted and described modules can be part of a CAN in which the controller, sensor, actuators communicate via digital CAN messages. It will be recognized that in embodiments consistent with the present disclosure, each of the various actions could be performed by specialized circuits (e.g., discrete logic gates interconnected to perform a specialized function), by program instructions, such as program modules, being executed by one or more processors (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU) or microprocessor), or by a combination of both, all of which can be implemented in a hardware and/or software of the ECM 60 and/or other controller, plural controllers, and/or modules, each of which can utilize a processor or share a processor with another unit (module, controller etc.) to perform actions required. For example, the engine parameter/operating conditions module 120 can be implemented as separate modules for the engine parameters and current operating conditions, and each module can be part of the ECM 60 or as a separately provided module. Logic of embodiments consistent with the disclosure can be implemented with any type of appropriate hardware and/or software, with portions residing in the form of computer readable storage medium with a control algorithm recorded thereon such as the executable logic and instructions disclosed herein, and can be programmed, for example, to include one or more singular or multi-dimensional engine and turbine look-up tables and/or calibration parameters. The computer readable medium comprise tangible forms of media, for example, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, or Flash memory), an optical fiber, and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), or any other solid-state, magnetic, and/or optical disk medium capable of storing information. Thus, various aspects can be embodied in many different forms, and all such forms are contemplated to be consistent with this disclosure.
While various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure have been shown and described herein, it is understood that the present disclosure is not limited these embodiments. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other embodiments according to the present disclosure may include changes, modifications and further applications from embodiments described herein.
This application claims benefit of priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 61/447,425 filed on Feb. 28, 2011, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention was made with government support under “Recovery Act—System Level Demonstration of Highly Efficient and Clean, Diesel Powered Class 8 Trucks (Supertruck),” Program Award Number DE-EE0003403 awarded by the Department of Energy (DOE). The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4368509 | Li | Jan 1983 | A |
5231897 | Morita | Aug 1993 | A |
5394331 | Dudek et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5598335 | You | Jan 1997 | A |
6038505 | Probst et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6154658 | Caci | Nov 2000 | A |
6356831 | Michelini et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374173 | Ehlbeck | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7036305 | Nishimura | May 2006 | B2 |
7155334 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7469533 | Dawson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7677030 | Dye et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7742867 | Liu et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7934373 | Chiba et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7987667 | Meier et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8079212 | Matsuoka et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8392091 | Hebbale et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20030160455 | Hu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040239488 | Douglass, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050090940 | Pajakowski et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050274553 | Salman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060119507 | Cawse | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185626 | Allen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070106442 | Lu | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112475 | Koebler et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080027639 | Tryon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080059036 | Imai et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080208393 | Schricker | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080249667 | Horvitz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254937 | Makiyama | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262712 | Duty et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090082957 | Agassi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090266060 | Guo et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276267 | Padan | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100010732 | Hartman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023190 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100089041 | Tai et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100228404 | Link, II et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287073 | Kocis et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318273 | Aleksic et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 1, 2013 from corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2012/027023. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120216509 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61447425 | Feb 2011 | US |