Patent Grant
8160800
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method of electronic engine fan control in a vehicle with an internal combustion engine equipped with an electronic engine control system.
2. Description of the Related Art
Letang, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,445,128 discloses a method for comprehensive integrated control of a compression-ignition internal combustion engine having integral fuel pump-injectors utilizing all electronic control unit is disclosed. The control strategy integrates various functions of engine control including fuel delivery, cooling fan control, engine speed governing and overspeed protection, engine braking, torque control, and vehicle speed diagnostics and control. Cooling fan control is integrated with vehicle speed diagnostics and control as well as fuel delivery to provide an integrated cruise control function which incorporates engine braking. The method also includes improved control over the various engine speed governors while improving idle quality by balancing the power delivered by each of the engine cylinders when at idle. The integrated torque control employs functions to reduce NOx emissions and noise utilizing adaptive fuel delivery timing and a split injection strategy.
A method to control an engine cooling fan (fan used for cooling engine coolant and/or compressed charge air via charge air cooler) in a vehicle/equipment with an internal combustion engine equipped with an electronic controller having memory and an engine fan and a transmission. The method includes enhancements to previously developed strategies for using the engine fan to provide additional vehicle braking, calibratable options for fan control when a new type of diagnostic fault (rationality checks) are active, and enhanced transmission retarder fan control logic. Fan control logic typically has a minimum on time in order to avoid fan cycling. The use of a common minimum on-time timer for all inputs to the fan control system may result in fan being enabled when unnecessary. Excess fan operation will result in lower fuel economy and reduced vehicle performance as a portion of the engine power is being used to drive the fan. The vehicle braking enhancement includes using a separate calibratable minimum fan on timer exclusively for dynamic brake requests. A second method for reducing excess fan operation by improving the vehicle fan braking logic is to immediately disable the fan once the vehicle fall brake request is no longer active, if the vehicle fan brake request is the only request for fan enablement.
The method may further include enabling the engine fan based on a rationality fault. For 2007, the California Air Resource Board established legal requirements per the title 13, California Code of Regulations, §1971. Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic System Requirements—2007 and Subsequent Model-Year Heavy-Duty Engines. The EMD regulation requires manufacturers to implement “rationality” diagnostics for all emissions relevant engine control system inputs and outputs. Per the EMD regulation “Rationality fault diagnostic” for an input component means verification of the accuracy of the input signal while in the range of normal operation and when compared to all other available information. This new class of faults is more difficult to determine than simple voltage comparisons versus a threshold as they involve determining under what engine and vehicle conditions a diagnostic check should be made. Furthermore, the engine parametric data is compared with other existing engine parametric data to determine the rationality (feasibility) of the data. Since these diagnostics are conducted on inputs that are also used for engine fan control, the following has been method has been developed for integrating this new diagnostic logic into the electronic fan control strategies. There is a calibratable to either enable the fan when a rationality fault has been determined on a fan system input (i.e. coolant temperature or oil temperature) or ignore the fault (use existing data even if determined to be irrational).
The method may further include enhancements to our transmission retarder fan control logic. Transmission retarders are capable of more heat rejection than the engine. Therefore, it is important to have anticipatory fan logic for applications with transmission retarders to reduce the amplitude of heat spikes to provide sufficient engine cooling and to avoid nuisance codes. Prior art used coolant temperature and transmission retarder status to determine whether or not the fan should be enabled. The fan was enabled if coolant temperature exceeded a minimum threshold and the retarder was active. In order to prevent unnecessary fan operation, additional criteria to enable the fan are added which include both a minimum vehicle speed threshold and a minimum transmission retarder temperature, both which must be exceeded in addition to exceeding the minimum coolant temperature threshold and having the transmission retarder active in order to enable the fan based on the transmission retarder.
With reference to
System 10 also includes a vehicle transmission 16 and a fan system 18. Fan system 18, and the various embodiments of the present invention, may suitably be implemented as an electrically driven fan system, a hydraulically driven fan system, or a direct drive system with a variable fan clutch. It is appreciated that some embodiments of the present invention are most suited for a hydraulically driven fan system, but some embodiments may be used alternatively with other types of fan systems. Sensors 20 are in electrical communication with a controller 22 via input ports 24. Controller 22 preferably includes a microprocessor 26 in communication with various computer readable storage media 28 via data and control bus 30. Computer readable storage media 28 may include any of a number of known devices which function as read only memory 32, random access memory 34, and non-volatile random access memory 36.
Computer readable storage media 28 have instructions stored thereon that are executable by controller 22 to perform methods of controlling the internal combustion engine, including variable speed fan system 18. The program instructions direct controller 22 to control the various systems and subsystems of the vehicle, with the instructions being executed by microprocessor 26, and optionally, instructions may also be executed by any number of logic units 50. Input ports 24 receive signals from sensors 20, and controller 22 generates signals at output ports 38 that are directed to the various vehicle components. The signals may be provided to a display device 40 which includes various indicators such as lights 42 to communicate information relative to system operation to the operator of the vehicle.
A data, diagnostics, and programming interface 44 may also be selectively connected to controller 22 via a plug 46 to exchange various information therebetween. Interface 44 may be used to change values within the computer readable storage media 28, such as configuration settings, calibration variables, temperature thresholds for variable speed fan control, and others.
In operation, controller 22 receives signals from sensors 20 and executes control logic embedded in hardware and/or software to control the engine, including controlling variable speed fan system 18. In a preferred embodiment, controller 22 is the DDEC controller available from Detroit Diesel Corporation, Detroit, Mich. Various other features of this controller are described in detail in a number of different U.S. patents assigned to Detroit Diesel Corporation. In particular, fan system 18 is controlled by all applied fan request signal 21 that commands the fan system. The applied fan request signal is generated by controller 22 based on any number of different factors such as various temperatures at different parts of the engine. Further, in accordance with the present invention, controller 22 processes a plurality of initial fan request signals using various techniques of the present invention to arrive at the final applied fan request signal that is sent to fan system 18. Further, in some implementations, additional information may also be supplied to fan system 18 as indicated by dashed line 19. The additional information such as, for example, an engine compartment temperature at a predetermined engine compartment hot spot, may be provided to fan system 18, such that fan system 18 may modify fan operation without strictly controlling the fan in accordance with the applied fan request 21. For example, fan system 18 may effect special control of the fan system, for example, during a cold engine start up as determined by a temperature at input 19.
As is appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, control logic may be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, or combinations thereof. Further, control logic may be executed by controller 22, in addition to by any of the various systems and subsystems of the vehicle cooperating with controller 22. Further, although in a preferred embodiment, controller 22 includes microprocessor 26, any of a number of known programming and processing techniques or strategy may be used to control an engine in accordance with the present invention.
Further, it is to be appreciated that the engine controller may receive information in a variety of ways. For example, transmission information could be received over a data link, at a digital input or at a sensor input of the engine controller. Continuing with the transmission information example, transmission parameters such as transmission oil sump temperature, transmission retarder status, etc., may be received over a digital communication data link. The data link could be in accordance with a Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) protocol, such as SAE J1587 or SAE J1939.
The method may further include enhancements to our transmission retarder fall control logic. Transmission retarders are capable of more heat rejection than the engine. Therefore, it is important to have anticipatory fan logic for applications with transmission retarders to reduce the amplitude of heat spikes to provide sufficient engine cooling and to avoid nuisance codes. Prior art used coolant temperature and transmission retarder status to determine whether or not the fan should be enabled. The fan was enabled if coolant temperature exceeded a minimum threshold and the retarder was active. In order to prevent unnecessary fan operation, additional criteria to enable the fan are added which include both a minimum vehicle speed threshold and a minimum transmission retarder temperature, both which must be exceeded in addition to exceeding the minimum coolant temperature threshold and having the transmission retarder active in order to enable the fan based on the transmission retarder.
When a digital input to the engine controller is used to receive information, a twisted pair could be hard wired to the engine controller digital input, from the transmission. The digital input could then be left open (high) or pulled to ground to indicate information Such as transmission retarder status as active or inactive, respectively. In another digital input example, a temperature switch could be hard wired to the digital input such that open indicates a temperature above a threshold while closed (pulled to ground) indicates a normal temperature (below the threshold).
And further, in the example, a sensor such as a sensor with an analog output could be wired to a sensor input of the engine controller. Further, it is appreciated that transmission information is an example, and the above techniques and others may be employed to provide other types of information to the engine controller.
The method may further include enabling the engine fan based on a rationality fault. For 2007, the California Air Resource Board established legal requirements per the title 13, California Code of Regulations, §1971. Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic System Requirements—2007 and Subsequent Model-Year Heavy-Duty Engines. The EMD regulation requires manufacturers to implement “rationality” diagnostics for all emissions relevant engine control system inputs and outputs. Per the EMD regulation “Rationality fault diagnostic” for an input component means verification of the accuracy of the input signal while in the range of normal operation and when compared to all other available information. This new class of faults is more difficult to determine than simple voltage comparisons versus a threshold as they involve determining under what engine and vehicle conditions a diagnostic check should be made. Furthermore, the engine parametric data is compared with other existing engine parametric data to determine the rationality (feasibility) of the data. Since these diagnostics are conducted on inputs that are also used for engine fan control, the following has been method has been developed for integrating this new diagnostic logic into the electronic fan control strategies. There is a calibratable to either enable the fan when a rationality fault has been determined on a fan system input (i.e. coolant temperature or oil temperature) or ignore the fault (use existing data even if determined to be irrational).
Step 60 is determining whether the actual vehicle operating parameter exceeds a calculated vehicle operating parameter range. For example, if the vehicle operating parameter being considered is vehicle speed, as a vehicle declines from a hill, the acceleration due to gravity becomes an additive to a calculated vehicle speed, such that a vehicle may experience uneven speeds as it travels through hilly terrain. This phenomenon must considered in the determination of whether a vehicle speed exceeds a calculated vehicle speed for a predetermined period of time. If the determination in step 60 is yes, step 62 is enabling engine fan to act as a dynamic brake for a time sufficient to operate the vehicle within a predetermined vehicle operation parameter. At step 64, a determination is made whether the actual vehicle operating parameter is less than a predetermined vehicle operating parameter. If no, the engine continues normal operation as at step 56. If it is determined the actual vehicle operating parameter is below a predetermined range, step 66 is disabling the dynamic fan brake control for a time sufficient to enable vehicle to meet or exceed the predetermined vehicle operating parameter.
Generally, rationality checks are performed to determine whether sensed vehicle operating parameters, such as engine coolant temperature, engine oil temperature, vehicle speed, and transmission retarder temperature. The checks compare the actual vehicle operating parameters, such as the various engine system or transmission temperatures or vehicle speed with a predetermined value to determine whether the sensed operating parameters are accurate. One the rationality check confirms the accuracy of the sensed operating parameter, the method employs the sensed operating parameter to determine how to control the engine fan.
While one method of the invention has been set forth in the specification, it is understood that the words employed are words of description and not words of limitation. Many modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4314487 | Ahlen et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 5359969 | Dickrell et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5445128 | Letang et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5615654 | Weisman, II et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5679093 | Desautels et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5732676 | Weisman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5847644 | Weisman, II et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 6026784 | Weisman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6045482 | Nishar et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6067489 | Letang et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6079536 | Hummel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6220223 | Weisman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6273034 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6328000 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330873 | Letang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6453853 | Hawkins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6463891 | Algrain et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6571751 | Vogt | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6748305 | Klausner et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6750623 | McCauley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6772714 | Laird et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6880497 | Avery, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6904352 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090164084 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
