1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a method and apparatus for fluid level regulation in a media coating system. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for sensing and regulating liquid ink and coating levels in an inkjet printing system and maintaining the satisfactory operation thereof.
2. Background Art
Drop-on-demand ink jet printers use thermal energy to produce a vapor bubble in an ink-filled chamber to expel a droplet. A thermal energy generator or heating element, usually a resistor, is located in the chamber on a heater chip near a discharge nozzle. A plurality of chambers, each provided with a single heating element, are provided in the printer's print head. The print head typically comprises the heater chip and a nozzle plate having a plurality of the discharge nozzles formed therein. The print head forms part of an ink jet print cartridge that also comprises an ink-filled container.
Ink jet printers have typically suffered from two major shortcomings. First, optical density of a printed image varies greatly with the print media or substrate being printed upon. Second, ink drying time is excessive on some media types.
Interaction between the ink and print media or substrate influences the performance of the ink jet printer. Different media types behave differently with the ink and not all media types are well suited for ink jet printing. Accordingly, attempts have been made to apply a liquid coating to the media before printing that interacts with the ink to improve the quality of the resulting printed image. The ink may contain, for example, penetrants to improve dry time and binders to improve performance. These “pre-coating” liquids may contain materials that cause the ink to flocculate on the surface of the media, improving image quality. Pre-coating liquids have previously been applied to the print media using a separate ink jet print head and by the use of a roll coating apparatus that directly contacts the print media prior to ink application. One roll coating apparatus and method of the prior art is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,183,079, assigned to Lexmark International, Inc.
Thus, a primary function of the media coating device is to deliver a uniform coat of specialized fluid to the print medium prior to printing. As the media is printed on, the interaction of the fluid and the ink results in superior optical density and faster dry time. As this specialized fluid is delivered to the coating device through a supply item, it becomes necessary to detect the presence of the supply item, and detect, maintain and control the level of the fluid within the coating device for it to perform properly. In particular, when the specialized fluid in the device's reservoir is depleted, timely refill should be conducted. In doing so, overfill should be avoided, and normal printing processes should not be interrupted.
Accordingly, there is a need for an apparatus for fluid level management in a media coating system for an inkjet printer that is capable of detecting, maintaining, filling and controlling the level of the specialized fluid in the media coating system.
The present invention, in one aspect, relates to an apparatus for fluid level management in a media coating system. In one embodiment, the apparatus has a supply item for the storage of a media coating fluid and an applicator having a trough for receiving the media coating fluid from the supply item. The apparatus utilizes a fluid level detection sensor that is located within the applicator to measure whether the media coating fluid level within the trough of the applicator is either above or below a threshold position and to generate an output signal. The apparatus has a controller for receiving the output signal and controlling delivery of the media coating fluid from the supply item to the applicator.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a fluid level detection sensor for measuring a media coating fluid level in a media coating system, wherein the media coating system has an applicator with a trough to contain the media coating fluid and the fluid level detection sensor is located within the applicator. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the fluid level detection sensor includes a first probe having a connecting end, a measuring end and a body therebetween, and a second probe having a connecting end, a measuring end and a body therebetween.
The first probe and the second probe are spaced apart from each other and the measuring end of the first probe is positioned higher than the measuring end of the second probe such that an impedance between the measuring end of the first probe and the measuring end of the second probe can be measured. The first probe and the second probe are made from conducting material such as stainless steel. Note, the first probe and the second probe can also be positioned at the same level.
Moreover, each of the measuring end of the first probe and the measuring end of the second probe has a surface contactable with the media coating fluid, and the impedance between the measuring end of the first probe and the measuring end of the second probe depends on the area of the surface of each of the measuring ends that is in contact with the media coating fluid. When at least one of the first probe and the second probe is not in contact with the media coating fluid within the trough of the applicator, the measured impedance between the measuring end of the first probe and the measuring end of the second probe is high. Conversely, when both of the first probe and the second probe are in contact with the media coating fluid within the trough of the applicator, the measured impedance between the measuring end of the first probe and the measuring end of the second probe is low.
The fluid level detection sensor also has an oscillator having an output, wherein the output is electrically coupled to the connecting end of the first probe and a detector having an input and an output. The input of the detector is electrically coupled to the output of the oscillator and the connecting end of the first probe for receiving a signal related to the measured impedance between the measuring end of the first probe and the measuring end of the second probe and the output generates an output signal.
An embodiment of the present invention comprises a relaxation oscillator formed using a comparator. The oscillator outputs an AC signal through a resistor and a capacitor.
In a further embodiment, the detector includes a field-effect transistor having a drain, a gate and a source, wherein the source of the field-effect transistor is grounded and the gate is electrically coupled to the output of the oscillator, and a frequency discriminator having an input electrically coupled to the drain of the field-effect transistor and an output. The field-effect transistor receives an output signal having a frequency from the oscillator output and allows the output signal to pass if the amplitude of the output signal is greater than a gate threshold voltage, and the frequency discriminator receives the output signal and at the output generates a logic low if the frequency of the oscillator output is higher than a threshold frequency, or a logic high if the frequency of the oscillator output is lower than the threshold frequency, respectively. On the other hand, if the amplitude of the output signal is smaller than the threshold gate voltage, the field-effect transistor blocks the output signal. The detector may further include a capacitor that is electrically coupled between the output of the oscillator and the gate of the field-effect transistor.
The fluid level detection sensor may also have a fail-safe circuit performing a closed-loop status verification test to verify if the fluid level detection sensor is functioning properly before the applicator is filled with the media coating fluid. In one embodiment, the first probe has at least one wire, and the second probe has at least one wire. The fail-safe circuit has a transistor having a drain, a gate and a source and a capacitor electrically coupled between the drain of the transistor and a second wire of the first probe, wherein the source of the transistor is electrically coupled to a second wire of the second probe, and the gate of the transistor is adapted to receive a control signal. The first and second wires of both probes are isolated from each other, respectively, by means such as nylon washer so that the first and second wire can contact each other through the probe body.
A further aspect of the present invention relates to a method for fluid level management in a media coating system, wherein the media coating system has an applicator with a trough to contain the media coating fluid. The method includes the steps of determining media coating fluid level within the applicator against a predetermined upper refill limit and a predetermined lower refill limit, and selectively transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator depending on the level of the media coating fluid against the predetermined upper refill limit and the predetermined lower refill limit and the status of the media coating system.
In one embodiment of the present invention the step of determining media coating fluid level includes the steps of measuring media coating fluid level within the applicator, generating a signal indicating that the fluid level is low if the media coating fluid level is lower than the predetermined upper refill limit; counting the number of pages coated since the fluid level reaches the predetermined upper refill limit; and determining if a media coating request is received.
Additionally, a further embodiment comprises the step of selectively transferring media coating fluid, when a media coating request is received, including the steps of holding a media coating operation responsive to the media coating request if the number of pages coated since the fluid level reaches the predetermined upper refill limit exceeds a first page number corresponding to the predetermined lower refill limit, and transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator.
As yet another embodiment comprises the step of selectively transferring media coating fluid, when a media coating request is received, including the steps of holding a media coating operation responsive to the media coating request if the number of pages coated since the fluid level reaches the predetermined upper refill limit is greater than the first page number corresponding to the predetermined upper refill limit but smaller than a second page number, and transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator when the media coating operation is accomplished.
Moreover, the step of transferring media coating fluid further comprises coating fluid, when a media coating request is received, includes the steps of holding the media coating operation responsive to the media coating page request once the number of pages coated is greater than the first page number corresponding to the predetermined lower refill limit, and transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator.
Furthermore, the step of selectively transferring media coating fluid, when a media coating request is not received, includes the steps of: transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator if the number of pages coated is greater than the second page number corresponding to the predetermined high refill limit.
In another embodiment, the method further includes the steps of detecting the presence of the supply item, and detecting the presence of the media coating fluid in the supply item. If no media coating fluid is detected in the supply item, the method further includes the step of replacing the supply item with a new supply item.
In yet a further aspect, the present invention relates to a system for fluid level management in a media coating system, wherein the media coating system has an applicator with a trough to contain the media coating fluid. The system has means for determining media coating fluid level within the applicator against a predetermined upper refill limit and a predetermined lower refill limit, and means for selectively transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator depending on the level of the media coating fluid against the predetermined upper refill limit and the predetermined lower refill limit and the status of the media coating system.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for fluid level management in a media coating system, wherein the media coating system has an applicator with a trough to contain the media coating fluid. The method includes the steps of determining media coating fluid level within the applicator against a predetermined upper refill limit and a predetermined lower refill limit; determining whether a media coating operation is in progress, and transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator when the level of the media coating fluid is lower than the predetermined lower refill limit and a media coating operation is in progress.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a system for fluid level management in a media coating system, wherein the media coating system has an applicator with a trough to contain the media coating fluid. The system has means for determining media coating fluid level within the applicator against a predetermined upper refill limit and a predetermined lower refill limit, means for determining whether a media coating operation is in progress, and means for transferring media coating fluid from a supply item to the trough of the applicator when the level of the media coating fluid is lower than the predetermined lower refill limit and a media coating operation is in progress.
These and other aspects will become apparent from the following description of the various embodiments taken in conjunction with the following drawings, although variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the disclosure.
Several embodiments of the invention are now described in detail. The disclosed embodiments are intended as illustrative only since numerous modifications and variations therein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Referring to the drawings, like numbers indicate like parts throughout the views. As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The present invention, in one aspect, is an ink jet printer including a coating apparatus (
Among other things, the present invention provides the following features:
Tracking and Control of Fluid Level With Minimal Feedback—With a simple two-state sensor that provides the indication that the fluid level is simply either above or below a threshold position, the present invention can control the fluid level to stay within a broader range. After fluid drops within an applicator of a coating apparatus, as it is being deposited on a printing substrate, an algorithm is utilized to calculate the fluid volume consumption per printed page and continually recalculate the remaining fluid volume in the reservoir. In order to prevent frequent small refill operations, the algorithm allows the fluid to drop to a minimal-acceptable level before another refill is attempted.
Logical Determination of Supply Item Status—An empty supply item is determined when a predetermined number of fill attempts fails to signify proper fluid level in the applicator. If this condition exists when the supply item is known to be present, an algorithm is utilized to determine that the supply item is indeed empty without direct measurement of the fluid level in the supply item. The algorithm can also be utilized to estimate a discreet fluid level contained in the supply item. By maintaining a consistent coat weight and knowing when a full supply item is installed, one can determine the remaining fluid level in the supply item.
Opportunistic Filling—The refill operation associated with a coating apparatus can interrupt and delay a print job. Thus, it is desirable to perform refills at times that minimize the possibility of printer delays. This is accomplished by avoiding refill operations during active printer times until the fluid level reaches an absolute minimum acceptable level. In addition, fluid is more likely added to “top off” the applicator during printer idle times. This is accomplished by having two fluid-level decision points, one low level that forces a refill under any condition and another, much higher level, that triggers a refill operation only if the printer is idle. In addition, the coating apparatus makes use of the printer power-on cycle time to refill the applicator if it is not completely full.
Fail Safe—An overfill of the reservoir of the coating fluid is considered as a failure of the system and should be avoided. Overfills may result in degraded print quality and fluid spills. It is important that if there is any failure of the system, the failure should make it appear to the system that the fluid level is full so that a refill operation is not attempted. A complete closed-loop verification of the system is performed before any refill attempt. This is accomplished by electronically shorting the sense probes through a fail safe circuit that has separate and isolated set of wires. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a four-wire configuration coupling to the two probes of the sensor.
Probe Isolation—According to the present invention, in one embodiment, the probes of a fluid level detection sensor in a coating apparatus measure the conductance between themselves to determine if fluid has reached the probes, therefore it is also possible that fluid contamination on the walls of the reservoir could appear as a conduction path, thus appearing as a full reservoir, which may prevent needed refills. This is a fail-safe mode, but if contamination does occur, it is desirable that the false conduction path dissipates in a reasonable period of time. This can be accomplished by proper isolation of the probes. In one embodiment, the geometry of the probe mountings attempts to maximize the total surface distance between the exposed metal of the sense probe and the ground probe. In addition, a large portion of this surface distance is composed of vertical surfaces, which may drain and dry more quickly.
These and other features of the present invention are described in more detail below.
Hardware Components of the Invention
The hardware associated with this invention may be described by tracing the path of a coating fluid. The present invention is initially described with reference to
The specialized coating fluid is delivered to the applicator 104, through the valve assembly 102 in the cartridge 100. As the fluid passes into the applicator 104, it is contained in a trough that is referred to as the bottom housing 110. The bottom housing 110 is a box made out of plastics, such as Noryl that contains 20% glass fibers. As the fluid fills the bottom housing 110, other parts contained in the bottom housing 110 are also exposed to the coating fluid. The specialized coating fluid's primary interface is with the applicator's 104 grit roll 200 (shown as a cross section in
There are many different ways to sense the level of the fluid as it fills in the bottom housing 110. With reference to
As shown in
The first probe 301 and the second probe 302 are spaced apart from each other and the measuring end 313 of the first probe 301 is positioned higher than the measuring end 314 of the second probe 302 such that an impedance between the measuring end 313 of the first probe 301 and the measuring end 314 of the second probe 302 can be measured. The first probe 301 and the second probe 302 are made from conducting material such as stainless steel.
Moreover, each of the measuring end 313 of the first probe 301 and the measuring end 314 of the second probe 302 has a surface contactable with the media coating fluid, and the impedance between the measuring end 313 of the first probe 301 and the measuring end 314 of the second probe 302 depends on the area of the surface of each of the measuring ends 313, 314 that is in contact with the media coating fluid. When at least one of the first probe 301 and the second probe 302 is not in contact with the media coating fluid within the trough 110 of the applicator 104, the measured impedance between the measuring end 313 of the first probe 301 and the measuring end 314 of the second probe 302 is high. Conversely, when both of the first probe 301 and the second probe 302 are in contact with the media coating fluid within the trough 110 of the applicator 104, the measured impedance between the measuring end 313 of the first probe 301 and the measuring end 314 of the second probe 302 is low. The data collected from the measurements can be received in a sensor circuit for analysis, which is discussed in detail below.
Proper isolation of the sense probe 301 and the ground probe 302 is required in order to prevent the fluid from forming a conductive path in the event that the unit tips over or if fluid contained within the bottom housing 110 is splashed. The existence of such a conductive path may result in the sensor 300 registering a “false full” reading within the bottom housing 110. This sensor failure mode may be designed to be time dependent. In one embodiment of the present invention, the sensor's recovery time as the result of a physical jarring can be reduced to a recovery time of 5 minutes or less. Additional factors that may attribute to this conductive path phenomenon are the wettability of the surface (features such as surface tension/energy balance and surface finish), fluid viscosity, vertical features and “drip edge” features.
The sense probe 301 and the ground probe 302 can be made from materials that are corrosion resistant such as stainless steel. In one embodiment, the probes are made from stainless steel where a coating fluid that is high in salts is utilized. In such a situation it is highly desirable that the probes that are utilized be corrosion resistant in order to ensure the proper operation of the sensor. In one embodiment, the probes 301, 302 are mounted within a glass-filled Noryl housing that has four vertical surfaces (not shown) with a combined vertical height of approximately 30 mm. The coating fluid has a resistance of about 1 kΩ and viscosity of about 45 cP. In a momentary tipping or re-orienting event, with this embodiment, the resistance from probe to probe has a slope of 3.3 kΩ per minute. This may result in a recovery time of approximately ⅓-minute, which is a reasonable constraint.
Alternatively, the fluid level detection sensor can comprise a single point level sensor. In one embodiment shown in
Additional alternative level sensors may include capacitance, thermistor, ultrasonic and optical sensors and the like.
Implementation of the Sensor Circuit
With reference to
In one embodiment, the fluid level detection sensor comprises an oscillator 502 having an output, wherein the output is electrically coupled to the connecting end of the first probe 506 and a detector 504 having an input 514 and an output 516. The input 514 of the detector 504 is electrically coupled to the output 512 of the oscillator 502 and the connecting end of the first probe 506 for receiving a signal related to the measured impedance between the measuring end of the first probe 506 and the measuring end of the second probe 508 and the output 516 of the detector 504 generates an output signal.
Due to specific design constraints, a DC measurement of resistance is not practical because the application of a direct current causes a chemical reaction between the probes 506, 508 and the fluid that will plate one probe and erode the other. Therefore, due to the fore mentioned reason it is necessary function of the present invention that an AC measurement of resistance be executed within the system. When an AC measurement is performed, the probes 506, 508 behave as a series resistor-capacitor combination. The consequential capacitance value depends on the surface area of the probe that is in contact with the fluid. The resulting resistive component depends on the conductivity of the fluid and the separation of the probes 506, 508.
In one embodiment, the oscillator 600 comprises a comparator 630 that is operably connected to an assortment of resistors 604, 606, 608, 614, 612, 616 and capacitors 602, 610. The oscillator 600 outputs an AC signal through the resistor 604. The AC signal transmitted through the resistor 604 may embody different forms such a square wave, a sinusoidal wave, or like. In the embodiment, as shown here, a square wave is utilized.
In one embodiment, the detector 700 includes a field-effect transistor 702, resistors 712, 716, 720, 722, 724 and a capacitor 718. The field-effect transistor 702 comprises a drain 708, a gate 710 and a source 706, wherein the source 706 of the field-effect transistor 702 is grounded and the gate 710 is electrically coupled to the output of the oscillator 600, and a comparator 704 is electrically coupled to the drain 708. The field-effect transistor 702 receives an output signal having a frequency from the oscillator 600 output and allows the output signal to pass if the amplitude of the output signal is greater than a gate threshold voltage, and the frequency discriminator 704 receives the output signal and at the output generates a logic low if the frequency of the oscillator 600 output is higher than a threshold frequency, or a logic high if the frequency of the oscillator 600 output is lower than the threshold frequency, respectively. On the other hand, if the amplitude of the output signal is smaller than the threshold gate 710 voltage, the field-effect transistor 702 blocks the output signal. The detector 700 may further include a capacitor 714 that is electrically coupled between the output of the oscillator 600 and the gate 710 of the field-effect transistor 702.
Self-Test Circuitry
In one embodiment, four wires connect the sensor circuit to the first 812 and second probe 810. Each probe has two wires, one for the sensor circuit and one for the self-test circuit 800. The probe forms the electrical contact between the two wires ensuring that if the self-test is successful, the wires must be connected to the probes. It is important to note that while each wire contacts the probe, they are isolated from each other by a non-conductive means such as a nylon washer. With such an arrangement, if any one of the four wires fails to make a conductive path between the probe and the circuit, the self-test will be unsuccessful.
The fail-safe circuit 800 has a transistor 802 having a drain 816, a gate 818 and a source 814 and a capacitor 804 electrically coupled between the drain 816 of the transistor 802 and the second wire of the first probe 812, wherein the source 814 of the transistor 802 is electrically coupled to the second wire of the second probe 810, and the gate 818 of the transistor 802 is adapted to receive a control signal. The nylon washer assures that any electrical continuity between the first and second wires occurs through the body of the probes.
Accordingly, the self-testing feature of the present invention if properly implemented ensures that overfilling of the device will be avoided. If the sensor output is stuck in a high state, no filling will ensue, since this is a full indication. If the sensor output is low, it will be tested to see that it can detect fluid before filling is allowed.
Operation of the Present Invention The algorithm utilized to implement the fluid level management system may best be described in three parallel processes. Each of the processes run concurrently and communicates to each other by the means of semaphores or flags. The three processes are 1) Fluid Level Determination, 2) the Main Printer Task, and 3) the Fill Task.
The Fluid Level Determination task, as shown in
If the fluid level is determined to be low at block 904, block 912 determines if a print page request for the coating path has been received. If this request has not been received, the task exits at block 910. When block 912 determines that the request has been received, the fluid low page count is incremented at block 914. If the fluid low page count is determined not to be greater than or equal to a predetermined lower refill limit at block 916, the fill required variable is set to the not required state at block 918 and the task exits at block 920. If the fluid low page count is greater than the lower limit, the fluid low page count is compared against the upper refill limit at block 922. If the fluid low page count is determined to be greater than the lower refill limit and less than the upper refill limit, fill required is set to opportunistic at block 924 and then exits at block 920. This setting indicates that the system has used enough fluid to warrant a fill operation; however, the need to fill is not critical at this point. This fill operation should only take place during times when the printer throughput will not be affected. If the fluid low page count is determined to be greater than the upper refill limit, fill required is set to mandatory at block 926 and then exits at block 920. This indicates that the fluid level in the applicator has fallen close to a level at which coating performance will be degraded. The need for a fill operation has now become critical and a printer operation will be interrupted in order to execute this fill operation. Once the fill-required variable is set, the task exits at block 920.
The Main Printer Task is shown in
If the cartridge is detected at block 1002, the status of the printer is checked at block 1010. If the printer is idle (not printing), the status of the cartridge empty flag is ascertained at block 1012. If this flag is set, indicating that the cartridge is out of fluid, all printed pages are diverted to alternate path at block 1014. If a print page request is not received at block 1016, the task exits at block 1018. If the cartridge empty flag is not set at block 1012, block 1020 determines if an opportunistic or a mandatory fill is required. If yes, the fill command is set to start at block 1022 in order to initiate the Fill task. If a fill is not required at block 1020 or if the fill command has just been set at block 1022, the print page request is checked at block 1016. If a print page request has been received, block 1024 checks if the printer is currently executing a fill operation. If a fill operation is under way, block 1026 checks to see if this is a mandatory fill. Upon determination that the fill is not mandatory, the fill command is set to abort at block 1028 and the print page request is processed at block 1030. The task will then exit at block 1042. If the printer is not filling at block 1024, the print page request is processed and then task will then exit. When the fill is determined to be mandatory at block 1026, the print page request is not processed. This request will be left pending until the fill process is complete.
If the printer is not idle at block 1010, it is determined if the printer is running at block 1032. If the printer is running, the status of the cartridge empty flag is ascertained at block 1034. If this flag is set, indicating that the cartridge is out of fluid, all printed pages are diverted to alternate path at block 1036. If a print page request has been received at block 1038, it is processed at block 1040 and the task exits at block 1042. If the request has not been received, the task exits at block 1042. If the cartridge empty flag is not set at block 1034, block 1044 determines if a mandatory fill is required. If a mandatory fill is required, the task will exit at block 1042. This allows any pages that are currently be processed to be completed and prevents any new pages from being processed. The printer will return to the idle state after the pending pages are completed and the logic described above will initiate the mandatory fill. If a mandatory fill is not required at block 1044, the execution continues at block 1038 with checking for a print page request as previously described.
The Fill task is illustrated in
If the fill command was not set to start at block 1102, block 1116 checks for the fill command being set to Abort. If the abort command is found, it is cleared at block 1118 and the fill mechanism is de-energized at block 1120 and the task exits at block 1114.
If the abort command is not found at block 1116, the status of the fill state is determined at block 1122. If the fill state is filling, the fluid level sensor is de-bounced at block 1124 and then the fluid level is checked at block 1126. If the fluid level is not low, the fill mechanism is de-energized at block 1128 and the fill state is cleared at block 1130 before the task exits at block 1140. If the fluid level is low at block 1126, the determination is made at block 1132 if the fill mechanism has been energized for a predetermined period. This predetermined period is set so that barring any failures, the fill mechanism will transfer sufficient fluid from the cartridge to the applicator to cause the fluid level sensor to detect the full fluid condition. If the fill mechanism has not been energized longer than the predetermined period, the fill operation is allowed to continue and the task exits at block 1140. If the predetermined period has been exceeded, the fill mechanism is de-energized at block 1134. Since the fill operation did not succeed, it is determined that the cartridge is empty. A message indicating this empty state is posted at block 1135 and an internal flag indicating that the currently installed cartridge is empty is set at block 1136. Finally, the fill state is cleared at block 1138 prior the task exiting at block 1140.
Once the Fill task has successfully transferred fluid from the cartridge to the applicator, the Fluid Level Determination task with detect that the fluid is no longer low and clear the fluid low page count and set the fill required to not required. If the Fill task is not successful, the Fill required will still be set, but the cartridge empty flag will prevent the Main Printer task from initiating another fill operation until the cartridge is removed and replaced.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific details of certain embodiments thereof, it is not intended that such details should be regarded as limitations upon the scope of the invention except as and to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2288720 | Knowlton | Jul 1942 | A |
3222209 | Brudige et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
4449476 | Voswinckel et al. | May 1984 | A |
4636814 | Terasawa | Jan 1987 | A |
4806847 | Atherton et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
RE33525 | Kohashi | Jan 1991 | E |
5396275 | Koike et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403358 | Aston et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406356 | Campbell et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5440329 | Meggitt et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445463 | Paranjpe | Aug 1995 | A |
5455604 | Adams et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462787 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5489928 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500668 | Malhotra et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500724 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505776 | Pichler et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512930 | Brandt et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521002 | Sneed | May 1996 | A |
5523122 | Harada et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546114 | Tait et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552819 | Brandt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561454 | Kurabayashi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563644 | Isganitis et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582087 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583544 | Stamer et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589869 | Brandt et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5614933 | Hindman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618338 | Kurabayashi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619240 | Pong et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623294 | Takizawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623718 | Bracken et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628827 | McCollam et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633045 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635969 | Allen | Jun 1997 | A |
5645888 | Titterington et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651620 | Paranjpe | Jul 1997 | A |
5676363 | Kishida et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677008 | Kameya et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677067 | Kojima et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678133 | Siegel | Oct 1997 | A |
5681643 | Noguchi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688603 | Iqbal et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694158 | Kato et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695820 | Davis et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702812 | Bracken et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708943 | Applegate et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712027 | Ali et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5784679 | Schlueter, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797318 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5808645 | Reeves et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825378 | Beauchamp | Oct 1998 | A |
5827577 | Spencer | Oct 1998 | A |
5882131 | Belon et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5908505 | Bargenquest et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5993524 | Nagai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002909 | Furuyama et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024428 | Uchikata | Feb 2000 | A |
6094557 | Shinohara | Jul 2000 | A |
6164746 | Akahira et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183079 | Meade et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6428157 | Wen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444270 | Naruse | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 726 156 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0 778 321 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 822 094 | Feb 1998 | EP |
63 299971 | Dec 1988 | JP |
05131646 | May 1993 | JP |
WO 9964243 | Dec 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030160835 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |