This application claims priority to applicants' co-pending application entitled “Computer System for Data Management and Method for Operating said System” having Ser. No. 08/836,713, filed May 13, 1997, claiming priority to applicants' PCT application No. PCT/EP96/03972, filed Sep. 10, 1996, which claims priority to applicants' EPO application No. 95114467.4 filed Sep. 14, 1995 (hereinafter the “CATS-OS system”), each of which is incorporated herein by this reference. This application also claims priority to co-pending application entitled “Computer System for Data Management and Method for Operating said System” having Ser. No. 09/454,978, filed Dec. 3, 1999, which claims priority to co-pending application entitled “Computer System for Data Management and Method for Operating said System” having Ser. No. 08/836,713, filed May 13, 1997, and applicants' applications entitled “Use of Computer System for Data Management and Method for Operating the System for Request for Quote” having Ser. No. 60/111,031, “Sales Trader Use of Computer System for Data Management and Method for Operating the System” having Ser. No. 60/111,030, and “Method and System for Warrant Trading Data Management” having Ser. No. 60/111,032, each filed Dec. 4, 1998, each of which is also incorporated herein by this reference.
The present invention is a system and method for allowing trading of securities using a network and at least one computer that dynamically creates multiple classes to execute trading functions.
With the advent of technology has come the desire to execute securities transactions in faster and more efficient methods. One method involves using a global network and a computer system as an interface between the person desirous of executing the trade and the trader.
The existing CATS-OS system includes use of a client-server architecture, which has a number of servers. These servers include, for example, a transaction server, a rate server, a hand-off server, a credit server, and a security server. In a typical interaction with the system, the user of the CATS-OS system connects to the system and is authenticated by the security manager, which allows the user certain privileges depending on the level of the user, such as customer, trader, and administrator.
A request for quote aspect of the CATS-OS system allows deals to be consummated that exceed the limits allowed by the host bank and in other circumstances in which a rate may not be available, for example, by allowing a trader to respond to a request for a quote and to provide a proposed price against which the user can trade. A sales trader aspect of the CATS-OS system allows a special type of trader, referred to as a sales trader, to deal on behalf of a selected customer within the CATS-OS system. A multi-bank aspect of the CATS-OS system allows a plurality of banks to deliver their prices and enables the single bank CATS-OS system to perform in a multi-bank mode by establishing links to one or more additional banks.
In the existing CATS-OS system, every component of the CATS-OS object linking and embedding (OLE) interfaces has only one top-level single createable class, called master class. The existing version of the OLE servers in the CATS-OS OLE interface has a simple flat hierarchy. Presently, the instance properties of all of its classes are set to be createable multi-use so that the OLE server can handle multiple objects of every class created by one or more OLE client applications. With this structure, only one instance of CATS-OS OLE interface is running to deal with all connections. Obviously, the existing CATS-OS interface can become a bottleneck when massive parallel connection requests are invoked.
A goal of the existing CATS-OS system is to provide the ability for a user working at a workstation, or particularly at a personal computer (PC), to automatically and electronically trade whether it is foreign exchange (FX) warrants or other instruments. As the existing CATS-OS system has been deployed to customers, and as electronic commerce has grown, it has become apparent that additional issues arise in doing electronic commerce.
For example, an issue that many organizations have is that in performing a trade at a PC, redundant entries are necessary into a number of the organization's other systems. Another potential issue for certain organizations which wish to use the existing CATS-OS system for automating electronic commerce is that a certain degree of manual intervention is still required for a user to perform the trade at the PC, so it is difficult to thoroughly automate the process.
In one exemplary conventional system, the server computer has installed into its software a single class. A class is a specification of what types of data and functions are permissible. As an example, one class may involve letter manipulation. In this class, the data type is “string” which is a serial collection of letters. A permissible function within this class is addition. Thus, a user of this class first creates objects (i.e. words like “cat” and “s”) and adds them together (i.e. “cat”+“s” results in the new string “cats”).
In this example, the addition function is defined to add the second presented string to the first in a serial fashion. Thus, if a user were to execute this addition function as follows: “s”+“cat”, the result would be a new string “scat”. Similarly, if the data type were strictly limited to letters, the function “4”+“7” would not result in “47” nor the traditional arithmetic result “11” but would result in an error message as the class would be expecting to operate on letters and not numbers.
From this simple example, a class is therefore defined as a software tool that allows users to operate on 1) specific data types using 2) specifically defined functions.
With this background established, a conventional trading system was developed where a single class was defined and the multiple traders accessed the definitions and functions of that class. While a single class can operate on multiple objects of that class, a bottleneck occurs if too many objects are in need of class resources at one time. More specifically, in this conventional system, each trader in the exchange is given his/her own object of the class. If there are thousands of traders trying to execute trades simultaneously, the computer will continually access the class definitions and functions to execute those trades. If there are more objects accessing class resources than the system can process at one time, the computer will begin to generate error messages and prevent certain trades from being executed. In a very bad scenario, the computer may shut down from this overload.
The present invention overcomes the problems of the conventional systems by creating multiple classes to execute a plurality of trades in parallel. The number of classes created dynamically at any given time is proportional to the number of clients attempting to execute securities transactions at that time. In addition, in another preferred embodiment of the present invention, each class created, has the capability of processing a plurality of objects at a single time. Thus, the capabilities of the software are expanded and the number of clients who can execute securities transactions at any given time is increased.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, disclose the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention, non-limiting examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
PC 110 is coupled to a network 115. In a preferred embodiment, network 115 is the Internet. Network 115 is coupled to a computer 120. Computer 120 is coupled to database 125. Computer 120 is also coupled to another network 130, which, in a preferred embodiment, is an intranet. Network 130 is coupled to PC 135. A floor trader 140 uses PC 135 to receive and transmit information and conduct trades on the trading floor 145. It should also be noted that computer 120 is a server capable of running in a Win 32 platform, such as Windows 95 or Windows NT.
In general, system 100 allows customer 105 to transmit and receive information to and from trader 140. The data exchange between customer 105 and trader 140 includes data relating to request for quotes (RFQ), purchases of warrants or other securities and confirmation of the purchase of warrants or other securities.
If the user is an existing customer and clicks on either button 210a or 210b of
At block 515, computer 120 performs a plurality of checks to determine if this customer is authorized to execute the requested transaction. For example, computer 120 pulls existing customer data from database 125 and uses the existing data to determine if the customer can execute this trade. More specifically, computer 120 determines whether or not this customer has the credit rating sufficient to pay for the purchase, is allowed to trade in the number of shares requested or not, etc. If the customer does not have the right credentials to carry-out the requested trade at block 515, computer 120 transmits a Web page informing the customer that the trade could not be executed at block 520 and the process ends at block 525.
If the customer has the right credentials to carry-out the requested trade at block 515, computer 120 transmits the trade request to PC 155 via network 130 at block 530. At block 535, trader 140 has the opportunity to respond to the request from the customer. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, trader 140 has about 7 seconds to respond to the requested trade by the customer before computer 120 revokes the request as being stale. If trader 140 does not accept the request within the time allotted, the trade is voided and the customer is so informed at block 540, and the process ends at block 545.
If trader 140 accepts the trade at block 535 within the allotted time period, computer 120 sends a notice of acceptance to the customer at block 550. Also in block 550, the customer is given the opportunity to review the order and the commission charged by trader 140 to execute this trade. At block 555, the customer decides if he/she wishes to accept or reject the trade. If the customer accepts the trade at block 555, then a confirmation number and a message are given to the customer at block 560, indicating that the trade has been accepted by both, the customer and trader 140, and will be executed in due course. The process then ends at block 565. If the customer rejects the response by trader 140 at block 555, the process ends at block 570.
Computer 120 creates a plurality of classes and associated objects to handle the customers as they log into the system. Thus, sets of class components 605 and 610 are created and destroyed as the need arises. In a preferred embodiment, the individual class components in each set 605 and 610 are object linking and embedded (OLE) class types.
Class component CMS 605b supports objects that include functionality that is common to a variety of customer applications loaded onto PC 110. More specifically, this class component supports objects that allow customers to log onto system 100 and obtain access to traders 140 as well as checking the password of those customers for security purposes. As can be seen, every customer must be verified and obtain access to traders 140 so this functionality is shared across all customers regardless of whether the customer executes a trade or not.
Class component WTS 605a contains a library of functions that allow the customer to send and receive messages to and from the warrants or securities trading system, as represented by trader 140 and PC 135. Thus, the library functions within the WTS class component 605a are specific to the trading system used by trader 140. In addition, class component WTS 605a also contains library functions to register new customers, obtain quotes of warrant or security prices from the trading floor 145 and maintain a transaction summary of executed buy and sell orders by recording the start and end dates of the trade, the customer reference number and system reference number.
Class component ITS 605c supports objects that act as a translator and go-between between the objects of the other class components 605a and 605b, and the trading floor 145 via ITSDLL 615a. It should be noted that the class component ITS 605c is capable of operating in both a synchronous and asynchronous format.
This type of structure where the classes are created dynamically as needed is called a dynamically linked library (DLL). Instead of designing the class components to be static, the class components 605 are created dynamically to match more closely the requirements of the clients. As an example, for small time traders, the maximum amount that a smaller client may execute is limited. Additionally, depending on the pricing scheme, small clients may be limited to fewer number of trades per day than larger clients. Larger clients may be given more options due to the volume in which they trade. Thus, classes are created with specific functions to handle smaller clients and other classes are created to process data generated by larger clients.
Various preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in fulfillment of the various objects of the invention. It should be recognized that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and adaptations thereof will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4363489 | Chodak et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4672572 | Alsberg | Jun 1987 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4774662 | Ito et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4825000 | Griffith et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
4942616 | Linstroth et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4975865 | Carrette et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5095429 | Harris et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5113499 | Ankney et al. | May 1992 | A |
5126936 | Champion et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5175797 | Funabashi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270922 | Higgins | Dec 1993 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5339392 | Risberg et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5500793 | Deming, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5508913 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5557517 | Daughterty, III | Sep 1996 | A |
5692233 | Garman | Nov 1997 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish | Mar 1998 | A |
5749077 | Campbell | May 1998 | A |
5761661 | Coussens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765141 | Spector | Jun 1998 | A |
5774877 | Patterson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778224 | Tobe et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787402 | Potter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788224 | Platt | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5797127 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5809483 | Broka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832505 | Kasso et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
5864827 | Wilson | Jan 1999 | A |
5873071 | Ferstenberg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893079 | Cwenar | Apr 1999 | A |
5915209 | Lawrence | Jun 1999 | A |
5970479 | Shepherd | Oct 1999 | A |
5987432 | Zusman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014627 | Togher et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6058378 | Clark et al. | May 2000 | A |
6134535 | Belzberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6282521 | Howorka | Aug 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0388162 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0401203 | May 1990 | EP |
0434224 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0512702 | May 1991 | EP |
0471063 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0513484 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 762 304 | Mar 1997 | EP |
2161003 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2165421 | Apr 1986 | GB |
2258061 | Jan 1993 | GB |
2277389 | Mar 1994 | GB |
04-030251 | Feb 1992 | JP |
07-175697 | Jul 1995 | JP |
2000-512405 | Sep 2000 | JP |
WO 9114231 | Mar 1990 | WO |
WO 9506918 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9526005 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9710559 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9853417 | Nov 1998 | WO |