This invention relates generally to gas turbine engines, and more specifically to turbine frame hanger lock assemblies and methods of assembling the same.
At least some known gas turbine engines include a frame that supports a rotor assembly. For example, gas turbine engines may include one or more rotor shafts supported by bearings which, in turn, may be supported by generally annular engine frames. An engine frame may include a generally annular casing spaced radially outwardly from an annular hub, with a plurality of circumferentially spaced apart struts extending therebetween. In some frame applications it may be necessary to protect the struts with fairings that have higher temperature capability. Because temperature variances can cause metals to expand and contract, it is desirable to separate high temperature engine components such as the flow path components, from comparatively low temperature peripheral components such as the frame components. To attach flow path components to the frame components, one or more hangers are used. The hangers serve to attenuate heat transfer from flow path components to frame components. Primarily, these hangers serve to affix flow path components in predetermined positions relative to frame components.
In some implementations, hangers are annular components with a curved cross-section. The outermost surface of the hangers contain apertures and are fastened (e.g., with bolts threaded through the apertures) to the frame of the turbine engine. The innermost surface of the hangers can be fastened to the flow path components, also utilizing apertures for receiving fasteners (e.g., bolts). In some cases, a single hanger may be used to attach a single flow path component to a frame component. In other cases, a single hanger may be used to attach multiple flow path components to a frame component. Each hanger conventionally requires a number of fasteners, adding a significant time burden to installation. Furthermore, the number of hangers and corresponding large quantity of fasteners contribute to the overall weight of the turbine engine. Even further, the use of bolts to attach hangers to various flow path and frame components inherently requires penetration of both the hangers and the respective components, increasing the potential for stress related failures in the gas turbine engine.
In one aspect, a system for use in limiting axial movement between a hanger and a fairing assembly within a turbine assembly is provided. The hanger includes an inner radial hanger bend portion that defines a hook channel therein. The fairing assembly includes an outer surface, a hook member extending from the outer surface to mate with the hook channel, and a circumferential groove defined in the outer surface such that at least a portion of the hanger bend portion is positioned between the circumferential groove and the hook member. The system includes a retention member sized for insertion into the circumferential groove, wherein the retention member is configured to extend from the circumferential groove and press against the hanger bend portion to facilitate maintaining the hook member within the hook channel.
In another aspect, a turbine assembly is provided. The turbine assembly includes a hanger including an inner radial hanger bend portion that defines a hook channel therein and a fairing including an outer surface, a hook member extending from said outer surface to mate with said hook channel, and a groove defined in said outer surface such that a portion of said hanger bend portion is positioned between said groove and said hook member. The assembly also includes a retention member sized for insertion into said groove, wherein said retention member is configured to extend from said groove and press against said hanger bend portion to facilitate maintaining said hook member within said hook channel.
In yet another aspect, a method of limiting axial movement between a hanger and a fairing within a turbine assembly is provided. The method includes extending a bend portion of the hanger to define a receiving channel therein, extending a hook member from an outer surface of the fairing to mate with the receiving channel, defining a groove in the outer surface such that at least a portion of the hanger bend portion is positioned between the groove and the hook member, inserting a retention member into the groove, and extending the retention member from the groove to press against the hanger bend portion of the hanger to facilitate maintaining the hook member within the receiving channel.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In one embodiment, the sets of segmented retainers 148 is inserted into the channel as shown in
Exemplary embodiments of a turbine hanger lock assembly and methods of assembling the turbine hanger lock assembly are described above in detail. The assembly and method are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, but rather, components of the assembly and/or steps of the method may be utilized independently and separately from other components and/or steps described herein. Further, the described assembly components and/or the method steps can also be defined in, or used in combination with, other assemblies and/or methods, and are not limited to practice with only the assembly and/or method as described herein.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
This application is a non-provisional application and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/639,563 filed Apr. 27, 2012 for “TURBINE FRAME HANGER LOCK ASSEMBLY AND METHOD”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/038464 | 4/26/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/163581 | 10/31/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3860358 | Cavicchi | Jan 1975 | A |
4247248 | Chaplin | Jan 1981 | A |
4573866 | Sandy, Jr. | Mar 1986 | A |
5192185 | Leonard | Mar 1993 | A |
5197853 | Creevy | Mar 1993 | A |
5553999 | Proctor | Sep 1996 | A |
5641267 | Proctor | Jun 1997 | A |
5669757 | Brackett | Sep 1997 | A |
5738490 | Pizzi | Apr 1998 | A |
6062813 | Halliwell | May 2000 | A |
6164656 | Frost | Dec 2000 | A |
6364606 | Rice et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6418727 | Rice | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435820 | Overberg | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6547257 | Cromer | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575697 | Arilla | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6672833 | MacLean et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699011 | Cot | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726446 | Arilla | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6895757 | Mitchell | May 2005 | B2 |
6918743 | Gekht | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6997673 | Morris | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011493 | Marchi | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7334980 | Trinks | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7360989 | Amiot | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7374395 | Durocher | May 2008 | B2 |
7452183 | Ruthemeyer | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7527469 | Zborovsky | May 2009 | B2 |
7721433 | Thompson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8033786 | Durocher | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8192149 | Audeon | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8328511 | Hernandez Russe et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8641371 | Nakamura | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8840061 | Caruel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8876042 | Lachapelle et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8961117 | Garin | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20050002779 | Tanaka | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050232760 | Wagner | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060216146 | Thompson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239814 | Uwami | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070031245 | Ruthemeyer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070160471 | Welch | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080106046 | Datta | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127491 | Lee | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080260524 | Khanin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090010758 | Wunderlich | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090142180 | Munson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090208322 | McCaffrey | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100074745 | Jones | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080699 | Pietrobon | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100247298 | Nakamura | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110044801 | Di Paola | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120137705 | Ura | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130223990 | Cloarec | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140050577 | Dimmick, III | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150132123 | Stricker | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102102588 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102171100 | Aug 2011 | CN |
1707749 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2980235 | Mar 2013 | FR |
2006275044 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006275045 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2011001951 | Jan 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Unofficial English translation of Japanese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2015-509195 dated Dec. 1, 2015. |
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201380022269.3 dated Jul. 31, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/038464 dated Aug. 16, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150132054 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61639563 | Apr 2012 | US |