The present disclosure relates generally to digital transmission systems.
Digital data transmission systems, such as, digital subscriber line (DSL) systems, have quickly emerged as a high quality solution for high speed Internet access and other services associated with high speed Internet services, such as, voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) and streaming video services. These systems can provide for multiple physical layer bearers. Separate bearers can be used to provide distinct data transmission characteristics that may be needed for different types of data and different applications. For example, voice data may require low latency, while video data may require a low error rate. Error control coding and interleaving of bearer channels generally result in a trade-off between latency and error rate.
Typically, each bearer is a distinct channel that can convey a portion of the total data payload to be transmitted over a communication line. Bearers can be implemented by assigning a certain subset of the total payload data bits in each physical layer frame. Further, the bit rate for each bearer is determined by a parameter stored in a data object for use with a simple network management protocol-management information base (SNMP-MIB). MIB objects can be controlled via GET and SET messages from an element management system (EMS). The bit rate for each bearer is typically set when a particular service is provisioned. The bit rate may change in response to changes in the transmission quality or changes to the service characteristics.
The bit rate for a particular bearer may need to change is response to beginning or ending a session for an application. For example, the bit rate may need to be changed in response to changing a number of simultaneous video programs that are being transmitted on a line. Additionally, an application may need to dynamically change a bit rate for a bearer. For example, a video program may need to change a bit rate as the content changes between standard definition video and high definition video. As a result, the bit rate for a bearer may need to change within a fraction of a second. However, the standard element management systems typically perform operations with a delay of ten to thirty seconds.
Also, it is inefficient to set a bit rate for a bearer at a high level for a long period of time since other bearer's within the same line could make use of the additional capacity. As such, the bearer bit rate should ideally increase almost instantly when necessary and decrease when the added capacity for the bearer is not needed.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved system and method of managing data bit rates for digital data transmission.
The present invention is pointed out with particularity in the appended claims. However, other features are described in the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
A method of managing data transmission is provided and includes measuring a first number of payload bits communicated over a bearer during a first time period. The first number of measured payload bits is divided by a length of the first time period to yield a short term average bit rate for the first time period. Also, a bit rate margin is added to the short term average bit rate for to yield a total bearer bit rate for the first time period. Further, a bearer bit rate can be provisioned based on the total bearer bit rate for the first time period.
In a particular embodiment, the bearer bit rate is provisioned based on whether the bearer is a fixed bearer or an adaptive bearer. Particularly, for an adaptive bearer, the total bearer bit rate for the first time period is determined as described above and then, the total bearer bit rate can be rounded up to a next quantum level for the bearer to yield the provisioned bearer bit rate. Also, for a fixed bearer, the bearer bit rate can be provisioned to a predefined fixed bit rate that is independent of the short term average bit rate. Further, in a particular embodiment, the method includes modifying a provisioned bearer bit rate after determining that the provisioned bearer bit rate is not between a maximum bearer rate and a minimum bearer rate.
In a particular embodiment, the method also includes summing a plurality of provisioned bearer bit rates for a line to yield a measured line bit rate. The measured line bit rate can be reduced to a maximum line bit rate. In a particular embodiment, a change from a first line bit rate to a second line bit rate is delayed. Alternatively, the change from the first line bit rate to the second line bit rate is not delayed. In a particular embodiment, the change from the first line bit rate to the second line bit rate occurs in within a predetermined time period. For example, the change from the first line bit rate to the second line bit rate can occur in less than one second.
In a particular embodiment, the method further includes resetting a rate change timer. Further, a second number of payload bits communicated over the bearer is measured for a second time period when the rate change timer reaches a threshold. Additionally, the bearer bit rate is re-provisioned based on a total bearer bit rate for the second time period. Also, the bearer bit rate is re-provisioned based on whether the bearer is a fixed bearer or an adaptive bearer.
In another embodiment, a method of executing a rate change for a bearer is provided and includes determining a new bearer bit rate for the bearer. Thereafter, a number of payload bits is allocated in a frame to be transmitted to the bearer. A transmission configuration message is sent and indicates the new bearer bit rate to a receiving device. A new line bit rate is determined based on the new bearer bit rate.
In yet another embodiment, a method of managing data transmission is provided and includes monitoring an error rate in a bearer in the direction of data transmission for a first time period. Further, the method includes determining whether the error rate is greater than a threshold. The bit rate of the bearer is reduced a predetermined amount, after determining that the error rate is greater than the threshold.
Referring to
In an illustrative embodiment, a layer 2/layer 3 switch 110 is connected to the first DSL modem 106 and a router 112 is connected to the second DSL modem 108. In a particular embodiment, the layer 2/layer 3 switch 110 is an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) switch or an Ethernet switch. As shown, the layer 2/layer 3 switch 110 and the router 112 are connected to a data network 114, e.g., the Internet. As such, in a particular embodiment, the layer 2/layer 3 switch 110 and the router 112 provide data network connectivity to the first DSL modem 106 and the second DSL modem 108. In an illustrative embodiment, an Internet service provider (ISP) 116 is connected to the data network 114. Moreover, in an illustrative embodiment, a corporate network 118 is connected to the data network 114. For simplicity, only one ISP 116 and only one corporate network 118 is shown connected to the data network 114, but any number of ISPs and any number of corporate networks 118 can be connected to the data network 114.
As depicted in
In a particular embodiment, data can be transmitted over the DSL network 100 using transmission control protocol/Internet protocol (TCP/IP), file transfer protocol (FTP) (e.g., for large files), user datagram protocol (UDP) (e.g., for VoIP and streaming video), or real-time transport protocol (RTP) (e.g., for streaming video files or streaming audio files). Further, in a particular embodiment, each modem 106, 108, 138, 152 can include a bit rate management module 156, 158, 160, 162 that can adjust the bit rate of data transmitted based on the type of data being transmitted.
Referring to
Continuing to decision step 206, the bit rate management module determines whether the bearer is a fixed bearer or an adaptive bearer, i.e., whether or not the bearer requires adjustment of its bit rate by the bit rate management module. If the bearer is an adaptive bearer, the method moves to block 208 and the bit rate management module rounds the total bearer bit rate up to a next quantum level for the DSL network. In an exemplary, non-limiting embodiment, the step size from one quantum level to another quantum level is sixty-four kilobits per second (64 kb/s). Next at block 210, the bit rate management module provisions the bearer with a bit rate that is equal to the rounded total bearer bit rate.
At decision step 212, the bit rate management module determines whether the provisioned bearer bit rate is between a maximum bearer bit rate and a minimum bearer bit rate. If not, the bit rate management module adjusts the provisioned bearer bit rate at block 214 so that it is between the range determined by the maximum bearer bit rate and the minimum bearer bit rate. The method then moves to block 216. At decision step 212, if the provisioned bearer bit rate is between the maximum bearer bit rate and the minimum bearer bit rate, the method proceeds to block 216. Returning to decision step 206, if the bearer is a fixed bearer, the method moves to block 210 and the bit rate management module provisions the bearer with a bit rate that is equal to a predetermined fixed bit rate that is independent of the short term average bit rate. From block 218, the method proceeds to block 216.
At block 216, the bit rate management module determines a line bit rate by summing all provisioned bearer bit rates for each of the bearers of a line. At decision step 220, the bit rate management module determines whether the line bit rate is greater than a maximum line bit rate. If so, the bit rate management module reduces the provisioned bearer bit rate for one or more of the bearers within the line, at block 222, and the method then moves to block 224. Returning to decision step 220, if the line bit rate is not greater than the maximum line bit rate, the method moves to block 224 and the bit rate management module determines the time since the last bit rate change occurred for one or more of the bearers within the line.
Thereafter, the method proceeds to decision step 226 and the bit rate management module determines whether the time since the last bit rate change is less than a minimum time before a permitted bit rate change. If so, at block 228, the bit rate management module delays the bit rate change until the minimum time is met. Thereafter, the bit rate management module executes the bit rate change at block 230. Returning to decision step 226, if the time since the last bit rate change is not less than the minimum time before a permitted bit rate change, the method continues to block 230 and the bit rate change is executed. At block 232, the bit rate management module resets a rate change timer. In a particular embodiment, the rate change timer can be set so that the time between bit rate change is relatively small so that changes in bit rate occur relatively quickly. For example, the rate change timer can be set so that bit rate changes occur every second or fraction of a second, e.g., one-tenth of a second. The method then ends at state 234.
In a particular embodiment, the method described above can be performed in both directions of data transmission by the modems on each end of a DSL line or the method may optionally be performed in one direction. For example, the method illustrated in
In a particular embodiment, a computer program including logic to implement one or more of the method steps can be executed by a bit rate management module within each modem. Executing the method within the modems can result in a quicker response time and a simpler design. In an alternative embodiment, the method steps can be executed at any other network element within the DSL network coupled to a particular line or channel within the DSL network.
Referring to
Moving to block 306, a new line bit rate is determined based on the new bearer bit rate. Thereafter, at decision step 308, the bit rate management module within the receiving modem determines whether the new line bit rate is greater than the current line bit rate. If not, the method proceeds to block 310 and the bit rate management module within the receiving modem determines that the new bit rate is lower than the current bit rate and decreases the current line bit rate to the new line bit rate. On the other hand, if the new line bit rate is greater than the current line bit rate, the method moves to block 312 and the bit rate management module within the receiving modem increases the current line bit rate to the new line bit rate. The method ends at state 314.
At block 402, the bit rate management module determines whether the error rate is greater than a threshold for a predetermined time period. If not, the method ends at state 404. Otherwise, if the error rate is greater than the threshold for the time period, the method proceeds to block 406 and the bit rate management module reduces the bearer bit rate a predetermined amount.
Next, at block 408, the bit rate management module monitors the error rate in the direction of the data transmission after reducing the bit rate. Moving to decision step 410, the bit rate management module determines whether the error rate is less than the threshold for the time period. If not, the method returns to block 406, the bearer bit rate is reduced again, and the method continues as described above. If the error rate is less than the threshold for the time period, the method moves to block 412 and the bit rate management module restores the bearer bit rate to the original bearer bit rate in order to return the bearer to its original transmission capacity. The method then ends at state 404.
With the configuration of structure described above, the system and method of managing digital data transmissions provides a technique of rapidly changing the bit rate of a bearer within a digital data transmission line. A bit rate management module within a modem can increase a bit rate associated with a bearer quickly when necessary and decrease the bit rate when the added capacity for the bearer is not needed. In a particular embodiment, the bit rate can be increased or decreased in less than a second. Also, in a particular embodiment the bit rate can be increased or decrease in less than one-tenth of a second. Further, in a particular embodiment, the entire process can be encapsulated in a software program that can be executed by a computer connected to the DSL network, by one of the modems within a DSL circuit, or by both of the modems within a particular DSL circuit. In an embodiment in which the software program is executed by a computer connected to the DSL network, the computer can perform the monitoring and adjusting functions and signal the modems accordingly.
The above-disclosed subject matter is to be considered illustrative, and not restrictive, and the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications, enhancements, and other embodiments, which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, to the maximum extent allowed by law, the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the broadest permissible interpretation of the following claims and their equivalents, and shall not be restricted or limited by the foregoing detailed description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3993867 | Blood, Jr. | Nov 1976 | A |
RE30111 | Blood, Jr. | Oct 1979 | E |
4387466 | Sire | Jun 1983 | A |
4450555 | Pays | May 1984 | A |
4598396 | Upp et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604740 | Gandini et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4750169 | Carse et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756007 | Qureshi et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5119365 | Warner et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5140616 | Renner | Aug 1992 | A |
5151927 | Medlicott | Sep 1992 | A |
5201045 | Pflueger et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208803 | Conforti et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214650 | Renner et al. | May 1993 | A |
5222130 | Pflueger et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5283827 | Conforti et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5343461 | Barton et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5388092 | Koyama et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5410754 | Klotzbach et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5434860 | Riddle | Jul 1995 | A |
5499269 | Yoshino | Mar 1996 | A |
5504736 | Cubbison, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5740241 | Koenig et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5768368 | Koenig et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796742 | Klotzbach et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5870466 | Koenig et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881148 | Koenig et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5909445 | Schneider | Jun 1999 | A |
5970139 | Koenig et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6144639 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144736 | Koenig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154489 | Kleider et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6290506 | Milner | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307839 | Gerszberg et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310909 | Jones | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6466088 | Rezvani et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490250 | Hinchley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512739 | Heidari et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546509 | Starr | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549520 | Gross et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6606430 | Bartur et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626591 | Bellotti et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6728238 | Long et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6760303 | Brouwer | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6760434 | Rezvani et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778525 | Baum et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7200672 | Senda | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20010008544 | Ishiyama | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010030998 | Yong | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020044528 | Pogrebinsky et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020090029 | Kim | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030007509 | Tzannes et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043785 | Liu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030112887 | Sang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112966 | Halder et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118177 | Karakas et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050039103 | Azenko et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050102412 | Hirsimaki | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004004284 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060165011 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |