The present invention relates to optical communications, and more particularly to an arrangement for optical transmission using minimum shift keying (MSK), that can be used in a high bit rate (e.g., 10 Gbit/s or 40 Gbit/s) optical communication system, including a wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) system.
The explosive growth of optical communications has generated the need to develop modulation and coding schemes that are robust against distortion over long transmission distances, easy to implement, and reliable. With respect to phase shift modulation alone, much work has been published regarding, for example, phase shift keying (PSK), differential phase shift keying (DPSK), and quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK), to name a few. To date, while many proposals have been made, there is still a need to improve the long haul performance of such systems.
In accordance with the present invention, minimum shift keying (MSK) is used as the coding scheme in a high bit rate optical transmission system, and the signal format is either RZ (return-to-zero) or NRZ (non-return-to-zero). The system can combine multiple individual channels with different wavelengths in a WDM or dense wavelength division multiplexed (DWDM) arrangement. Dispersion management can be provided using several techniques, such as quasi-linear transmissions or conventional RZ transmissions.
At the transmitter, an optical MSK transmitter is used to modulate the phase of a stream of high bit rate (e.g., 40 Gbit/s) optical signals. Many such data streams can be combined in a wavelength division multiplexer and transmitted to a remote receiver, where the signal is wavelength division demultiplexed. The encoded data in each wavelength channel is then recovered by an MSK receiver, which may consist of a delay demodulator and a balanced detector.
Similar to DPSK (which is described in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/990,964 (Chraplyvy 28-3-1-7) entitled “Long Haul Transmission In A Dispersion Managed Optical Communication System”, filed on Nov. 21, 2001, and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, MSK coding has an approximately 3 dB higher receiver sensitivity than on-off keying (OOK) in a linear channel when a balanced receiver is used, and allows for transmission with lower optical power. A lower optical power helps reduce penalties from nonlinear effects, such as cross phase modulation (XPM) and four wave mixing (FWM).
Compared with DPSK, MSK has the additional advantage of robustness against tight optical filters, which makes MSK a preferred coding scheme for high spectral efficiency systems and systems with optical add-drop multiplexers (OADM's).
The present invention will be more fully appreciated by consideration of the following detailed description, which should be read in light of the drawing in which:
The following acronyms are used in this application:
In considering the following detailed description, the disclosures contained in the following co-pending applications, which are assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, should be considered:
Minimum shift keying (MSK) is a known coding scheme in radio and microwave communications. See M. L. Doelz and E. T. Heald, “Minimum-shift data communication system”, U.S. Pat. No. 2,977,417, Mar. 28, 1961. It is also sometimes called fast frequency shift keying (Fast FSK). See R. deBuda, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-20, p. 429 (1972). However, MSK is rarely used in optical fiber communications. K. Iwashita and T. Matsumoto, in a paper entitled “Modulation and detection characteristics of optical continuous phase FSK transmission system”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. LT-5, 452-460 (1987), considered MSK as a special case of continuous phase frequency shift keying (CPFSK) for optical fiber communications. In the approach described, an optical MSK signal with a constant amplitude was transmitted at a very low rate, 400 Mb/s, over a distance of 290 km and detected with heterodyne detection. However, the transmitter and receiver used in that experiment were both unable to handle the high-bit-rate (e.g., 40 Gb/s) WDM transmission systems that are desired today. For example, the heterodyne detection with a local laser oscillator is not practical in a real optical communication system.
In another paper entitled “Fiber transmission properties of optical pulses produced through direct phase modulation of DFB laser diode”, Electronics Letters, Vol. 24, p. 486 (1988), M. Shirasaki, et al. transmitted a short data sequence (16 bits) at 4 Gb/s over 102 km of fiber using an optical signal that might, in some sense, be thought of as being similar to an MSK signal. However, the authors did not mention anything about MSK and did not address issues of balanced detection, nor issues relating to fiber non-linearity, that are essential to a modern day optical transmission arrangement. The directly-frequency-modulated laser is also believed to be not practical to handle high bit rate like 40 Gb/s. Despite these early studies related to MSK, it has never been successfully used in high speed, long haul optical fiber communications.
Referring now to
Considering now the exemplary data sequence “01110010”, and assuming that the phase reference of the MSK signal is at phase 0 at time t=0, the first bit, which is a “0” causes a −π/2 phase shift at t=1; the next bit, which is a “1”, causes a π/2 phase shift at t=2, so that the absolute phase is now 0. The next bit, which is also a “1”, causes a π/2 phase shift at t=3, so that the absolute phase is now π/2. In a similar fashion, the phase continues as follows:
Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that the complementary scheme, i.e., wherein a 0 causes a π/2 shift, and a 1 causes −π/2 shift, can also be used.
For the purposes of comparing MSK with DPSK,
In an actual implementation of an MSK system in accordance with the present invention, the phase diagram of
Although this example of MSK described above in connection with
In order to understand the operating principles for a receiver arranged to extract the original data from the MSK coded stream of optical pulses, we assume for simplicity that the complex amplitude of the nth light pulse is
Ãn=|A|exp(iφn),
where |A| is an constant and φn is the phase of the nth light pulse. In this example, a digital “1” and a digital “0” are transmitted with φn=φn−1+π/2 and φn=φn−1−π/2 , respectively. Under these conditions, an MSK signal can be decoded in a manner similar to that used in connection with DPSK coding, such as with a one-bit-delay interferometer and a balanced receiver shown in
and a different interference at the other output 317 of the interferometer is given by:
If φn=φn−1+π/2 , we find (I1)n=|A|2 and (I2)n=0 . On the other hand, if φn=φn−1−π/2 , we find (I1)n=0 and (I2)n=|A|2. This indicates that (I1)n corresponds to the original data, while (I2)n from the other port of the interferometer corresponds to the inverted data. These two outputs can be further processed electronically with a balanced differential amplifier 325. It is known that such a balanced detection scheme helps improve the receiver sensitivity significantly.
For comparison purposes, it is noted that the above described arrangement differs from a DPSK delay demodulator, in which the two arms of the delay interferometer have a relative offset phase of π/2.
An optical MSK transmission system in accordance with the present invention has all of the advantages of an optical DPSK system, including improved receiver sensitivity, reduced nonlinear penalties, etc., which have been described in the co-pending application of Chraplyvy et al. However, MSK has additional advantages compared with DPSK. By equalizing the phase separation between two adjacent optical signals to π/2 (or 90 degrees), MSK is more robust against inter-symbol-interference (ISI) effects that arise from tight optical filtering. This is important for optical transmission systems with high spectral efficiencies and systems with multiple optical add drop multiplexers (OADM's), in which the so-called concatenated filtering effect may have a significant impact on the system performance.
The advantages of MSK over DPSK can be explained by considering the symmetry of the optical power spectra of the demodulated optical signals from the two outputs of the delay interferometer, as shown in
MSK has another advantage over DPSK which also deserves some explanation. When an RZ pulse train passes through a narrow optical filter, the pulses are broadened and may overlap and interfere with neighboring pulses. Between two adjacent pulses, the interference could be either constructive or destructive, depending on the relative phase between the two. For DPSK, this causes a pattern dependent intensity fluctuation of the optical signal, which may translate into pattern dependent nonlinear penalties (for example, pattern dependent nonlinear phase noise through SPM and intra-channel four wave mixing). For MSK, however, such a pattern dependent intensity fluctuation can be greatly reduced, because two adjacent optical pulses have a π/2 (or 90 degree) phase difference with respect to each other, and therefore do not interfere.
To perform long haul and ultra-long haul (ULH) transmissions of MSK signals, optical fiber spans with optical amplifiers and proper dispersion management are needed. In accordance with the present invention, dispersion compensation in the optical transmission medium can be achieved by using a dispersion managed fiber link, which can be implemented by the use of multiple fiber spans between transmitter and receiver, where each span comprises contiguous regions having negative and positive dispersion fibers. The dispersion map, which is a plot of dispersion vs. distance in a typical dispersion managed transmission medium arranged for high-speed data transmission, is shown in
Some details of a system embodying the present invention (used in both numerical simulations and experiments) will be useful. RZ pulses with 33% duty-cycle can be used for 40 Gb/s MSK systems. An MSK WDM system can have many spans, for example, with each span consisting of 100 km of TWRS (D=6 ps/km/nm) and a dispersion compensating module made of DCF (D=−100 ps/km/nm). The length of the DCF is chosen to give the designed residual dispersion per span or path-averaged dispersion (Davg). The channel spacing is 100 GHz. A 85-GHz (FWHM) 3rd-order Gaussian filter can be used to demultiplex the channels, and the detection scheme for the RZ-MSK can be one-bit delayed differential direct detection. A 5th-order Bessel filter (electrical) with a 3 dB bandwidth of 0.7 bit-rate can be used after signal detection.
The advantages of MSK over DPSK in next generation optical networking systems with optical add-drop modules (OADM's) is illustrated in
To further increase transmission capacity and reduce cost, systems with ultra-high spectral efficiency, e.g. 0.8 bit/Hz, are very attractive. One way to realize 0.8 spectral efficiency is to pack 40 Gbit/s channels with 50-GHz channel spacing.
While there are various techniques to generate an optical MSK signal in transmitter 100 of
Other MSK transmitter designs using the same general concept are depicted in
There is yet another arrangement, illustrated in
Some simulation results are illustrated in
While in the above description, the present invention was applied in the context of a high bit rate system, it is to be understood that the MSK technique as described above can also be used with systems with a variety of different bit-rates, as well as with many different fiber types and dispersion maps. For example, satisfactory performance can also be obtained with standard single mode fiber.
Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2977417 | Doelz et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
4995052 | Thorvaldsen | Feb 1991 | A |
5400165 | Gnauck et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
RE37621 | Henmi et al. | Apr 2002 | E |
6396605 | Heflinger et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6525857 | Way et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6563623 | Penninckx et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567394 | Arisawa | May 2003 | B1 |
6763197 | Hirano et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20030026199 | Myers | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063683 | MacFarlane et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030157905 | Holmqvist | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040208647 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |