System and method of optimizing fuel injection timing in locomotive engine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6799561
  • Patent Number
    6,799,561
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 23, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 5, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for reducing engine emissions in a locomotive are presented. In an embodiment, a fuel injector or a fuel injection pump of a fuel injection mechanism includes a plunger with an upper helix whose angle changes between points on the plunger that correspond to an idle throttle position and a full throttle position. As such, injection timing is optimized, and engine emissions are reduced.
Description




BACKGROUND




1. Field




Embodiments of the present invention relate to systems and methods for reducing engine emissions in a diesel engine, such as a locomotive diesel engine.




2. Description of Related Art




Locomotive manufacturers and remanufacturers supply locomotive diesel engines to the rail transportation industry, which includes establishments furnishing transportation by line-haul railroad, as well as switching and terminal establishments. In recent years, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emissions standards for locomotive diesel engines have become increasingly demanding. In particular, standards enacted under the Federal Clean Air Act of 1998 require significant reductions of individual emission compounds, including oxides of nitrogen (NO


x


). NO


x


gases, which include the compounds nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO


2


), are a major component of smog and acid rain.




Exhaust from a locomotive diesel engine includes various gaseous constituents, such as NO


x


, carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO


2


), and hydrocarbons (HC), as well as particulate matter. Severe environmental and economic consequences may ensue if locomotive engine emissions do not comply with applicable EPA standards.




U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,844 to Biess et al. discloses a system and method that automatically shuts down a primary engine of a locomotive after the primary engine has been idling for a predetermined period of time. A small secondary engine is started to perform useful functions on behalf of the shut-down primary engine. Because it reduces locomotive idle time, this approach reduces engine emissions. However, engine emissions remain a cause for concern when the primary engine is running.




Therefore, what is needed is a system and method for reducing engine emissions in a locomotive.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a partially broken away cross-sectional view of a fuel injector according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 2A

,


2


B, and


2


C illustrate a fuel injector plunger in various exemplary degrees of rotation according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 3A

,


3


B, and


3


C illustrate exemplary planar views of an axial portion of a plunger according to embodiments of the present invention.





FIG. 4

illustrates a selected portion of a plunger according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 5

illustrates a selected portion of a plunger according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 6A and 6B

illustrate exemplary plungers according to embodiments of the present invention.





FIG. 7

illustrates a process according to an embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Systems and methods for an engine, such as a diesel engine in a locomotive, are presented. In various embodiments, a fuel injection mechanism includes a fuel injector (unit injector) or fuel injection pump. The fuel injector or fuel injection pump includes a plunger with an upper helix whose angle changes between points on the plunger that correspond to an idle throttle position and a full throttle position. As such, injection timing is optimized, and engine emissions are reduced.




In other embodiments, the fuel injection mechanism employs a nozzle tip formed of a chromium hot-work steel. Accordingly, reductions in engine emissions may be sustained over long periods of time.





FIG. 1

is a partially broken away cross-sectional view of a fuel injector


100


according to an embodiment of the present invention. In various embodiments, injector


100


may be a unit injector for a fuel system of an engine, such as a diesel engine manufactured by GM EMD (General Motors Electro-motive Division). EMD-type engines employ mechanical control of injection timing and may be implemented effectively in various settings, such as, for example, locomotive (line-haul, switcher, passenger, or road), marine propulsion, offshore- and land-based oil well drilling rigs, stationary electric power generation, nuclear power generating plants, and pipeline and dredge pump applications. In one embodiment, injector


100


is implemented in an EMD 567, 645, or 710 series engine.




For exemplary purposes, drawings herein depict a unit injector and associated plungers for EMD-type engines. However, it is to be understood that teachings herein may be similarly applied to engines that employ fuel injection pumps, such as diesel engines manufactured by GE Transportation Systems, including the GE 7FDL and 7HDL engines, and diesel engines manufactured by ALCO. In such engines, each fuel injection pump includes a plunger that supplies fuel to an injector via a high pressure fuel line. Helices of such plungers may be modified consistent with principles presented herein. A nozzle tip as described herein also may be utilized.




Fuel injector


100


includes a body


150


, a plunger


110


, a housing nut


115


, a bushing


120


, a nozzle tip


130


, and spray holes


140


. Other components of injector


100


are not shown in FIG.


1


and are known in the art. Injector


100


is located and seated in a hole of a cylinder head of an engine fuel system.




In an embodiment, nozzle tip


130


of injector


100


may be formed of a chromium hot-work steel. The steel may be substantially through-hardened, and may conform, for example, to the H11 specification of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) or the T20811 specification of the Unified Numbering System (UNS). As such, nozzle tip


130


may create effective atomization for longer periods of time, without deterioration of spray holes


140


. Accordingly, injector


100


may have an extended life of use in an injection system.




Plunger


110


slidably fits within bushing


120


. Bushing


120


includes an upper port


160


and a lower port


170


. Upper port


160


and lower port


170


are pathways for fuel. The amount of fuel injected into a cylinder depends on the extent to which the ports are closed, as described below.




The specific form of plunger


110


, including diameter, roundness, and straightness thereof, may vary depending on the implementation. Diameters of plungers may vary depending on the amount of fuel that is needed for injection. In an exemplary implementation, plunger


110


may have a diameter of between about 8 and 22 mm. Materials for plunger


110


may be chosen to prevent plunger


110


from substantially wearing down over time, and thus to prevent performance of plunger


110


from being degraded. Plunger


110


may be formed, for example, of bearing quality or high alloy steel, such as a chromium/nickel alloy. For example, the steel may conform to the 51501 or 52100 specifications of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Use of appropriate metals may ensure that helices described below maintain their shape for longer periods of time.




Plunger


110


includes an upper helix


180


and a lower helix


190


. Upper helix


180


and lower helix


190


determine the opening and closing of upper port


160


and lower port


170


of bushing


120


. Upper helix


180


determines when injection starts, and lower helix


190


determines when injection ends. As such, the helices determine the volume of fuel that is injected.




Upper helix


180


and lower helix


190


include ridges that define a shallow fuel channel


195


encircling an axial portion of plunger


110


. Upper helix


180


and lower helix


190


may be formed in various ways. In some embodiments, upper helix


180


and/or lower helix


190


are formed as a part of a machining operation that produces plunger


110


. In other embodiments, an existing plunger is modified by a selective machining operation to produce upper helix


180


and/or lower helix


190


.




In particular, upper helix


180


includes a ridge portion that slopes from a first point on the plunger surface towards a second point on the plunger surface. Sloping may involve one or more instances of ascending, descending, or neither ascending nor descending, between the first and second points. In some embodiments, the first point may be associated with an idle throttle position of injector


100


, and the second point may be associated with a full throttle position of injector


100


. Changes in slope of the ridge portion imply that the ridge portion may include multiple segments of predetermined length and/or height. In some embodiments, changes in slope may occur gradually such that one or more portions of the ridge portion are curved in perspective; for such embodiments, segments of the ridge portion may be extremely short. In other embodiments, changes in slope may be abrupt such that the ridge portion appears to have one or more clearly distinct portions.




Plunger


110


may be given a constant stroke reciprocating motion by an injector cam acting through a rocker arm and plunger follower (not shown). Timing of the injection period during the plunger stroke may be set by an adjusting screw at the end of the rocker arm.




Plunger


110


may be rotated via a rack and gear (not shown), as known in the art. Rotation of plunger


110


regulates the time that upper port


160


and lower port


170


may open and close during the downward stroke, thus determining the quantity of fuel injected into the cylinder. As plunger


110


is rotated from idle throttle position to full throttle position, the pumping part of the stroke is lengthened, injection is started earlier, and more fuel is injected.




Proper atomization of fuel is accomplished by the high pressure created during the downward stroke of plunger


110


, which forces fuel past a needle valve (not shown), causing the needle valve to lift, thus forcing fuel out through spray holes


140


in nozzle tip


130


of injector


100


.




A “helix angle” of a helix is the angle between a tangent to the helix and a line perpendicular to the internal axis of the helix and intersecting the tangent point. Changes in helix angle generally correspond to changes in the observed slope of a helix of a plunger. That is, when the helix angle changes, one may observe a change in slope (also called “lead”) of the helix. For embodiments herein, for ease of explanation, a plunger is described as having one helix with multiple helix angles (i.e., multiple slopes or leads). However, it is to be understood that the upper helix of a plunger herein actually has one or more portions of respective helices that have associated helix angles.




According to various embodiments of the present invention, plunger


110


has an upper helix whose helix angle changes at least once from a first point on plunger


110


which corresponds to an idle throttle position to a second point on plunger


110


which correspond to a full throttle position. As such, injection timing of injector


100


may be optimized as plunger


110


is rotated within bushing


120


.




In some embodiments, the helix angle changes such as to advance injection timing. Alternatively or additionally, the helix angle changes such as to retard, or neither advance nor retard, injection timing. By optimizing injection timing, emissions and combustion efficiency may be improved for an engine.




In an EMD-type unit injector, degrees of rotation of plunger


110


within bushing


120


may be associated which predetermined discrete throttle positions. Table 1 lists exemplary association that may be implemented in a diesel-electric locomotive. Plunger


110


in Table 1 may have a diameter ranging from about 0.420 to 0.422 inches, for example.












TABLE 1











Degrees of Rotation and Throttle Positions














Degree of Rotation of








Plunger 110




Throttle Position











 0°




Idle







 25°




Notch 1







 50°




Notch 2







 75°




Notch 3







100°




Notch 4







125°




Notch 5







150°




Notch 6







175°




Notch 7







200°




Notch 8















As Table 1 illustrates, adjacent throttle positions are uniformly separated by 25°. For instance, when a locomotive engineer moves a throttle selector from notch


4


to notch


5


, the plunger


110


is rotated 25° within bushing


120


. Similarly, when the throttle selector is moved from notch


5


to notch


6


, plunger


110


is rotated another 25°.




It is to be appreciated that Table 1 represents an exemplary division into discrete throttle positions, and that 25° is an exemplary division. In other engine implementations, there may be more or fewer discrete throttle positions, and/or the divisions between discrete throttle positions need not be uniform. Moreover, in some embodiments, such as, for example, marine and stationary power embodiments, there may not be discrete throttle positions. For example, the operating of a lever may gradually and continuously increase or decrease the throttle, i.e., rotate a plunger within a bushing.




According to some embodiments of the present invention, helix angles on a plunger, and point(s) on the plunger at which transitions in helix angle occur are selected based on emissions data and/or empirical engine performance testing. For example, weighted emissions duty cycles or other relevant data may be studied. If, for example, it is demonstrated that emission levels are problematic for an engine running in idle, notch


1


, and notch


2


, then the upper helix of a plunger may have different helix angles at points on the plunger, such as points corresponding to those throttle settings, in order to retard or advance injection timing. The form of lower helix


190


also may be varied, which may impact upon the injection process.




Moreover, the effects of varying helix angles, which may be engine- and implementation-specific, may be studied to determine optimal helix angles and transition points on a plunger for throttle settings ranging from full to idle. Exemplary criteria for evaluating implementations may include emissions levels and combustion efficiency. In various embodiments, helix angles and transition points may be chosen to ensure compliance with regulatory emissions limits, while minimizing fuel penalties associated with compliance.





FIGS. 2A

,


2


B, and


2


C illustrate plunger


110


in various degrees of rotation according to an embodiment of the present invention. Upper helix


180


generally slopes from a point


210


corresponding to an idle throttle position (

FIG. 2A

) to a point


240


corresponding to a notch


8


throttle position (FIG.


2


C).




More particularly,

FIG. 2A

shows that upper helix


180


generally slopes downward from point


210


.

FIG. 2B

shows a change in slope (helix angle) of upper helix


180


at a point


220


corresponding to a notch


5


throttle position, and another change in slope (helix angle) at a point


230


corresponding to a notch


6


throttle position. Finally,

FIG. 2C

shows upper helix


180


slope to a point


240


corresponding to a notch


8


throttle position.




It is to be appreciated that

FIGS. 2A

,


2


B, and


2


C are merely illustrative of an exemplary plunger


110


according to an embodiment of the present invention. The precise form of upper helix


180


, including the number of transitions in slope (helix angle), and the points on plunger


110


at which transitions occur, as well as the angular measurements of each helix angle, may vary depending on the implementation.





FIGS. 3A

,


3


B, and


3


C illustrate planar views of an axial portion of plunger


110


between lines B and B′ of

FIG. 2A

according to embodiments of the present invention. Upper and lower helices are shown in each figure. Parallel lines identify points along the upper helix that correspond to particular throttle settings.





FIG. 3A

shows a reference upper helix


310


and a reference lower helix


320


. Reference upper helix


310


has a helix angle that does not substantially change from idle (0°) to notch


8


(200°). As seen in

FIG. 3A

, the slope of reference upper helix


310


is substantially constant from idle to notch


8


.





FIG. 3B

shows an exemplary upper helix


330


and lower helix


340


according to an embodiment of the present invention. For purposes of comparison, reference upper helix


310


and reference lower helix


320


of

FIG. 3A

are shown in dashed lines in FIG.


3


B. Portions of upper helix


330


that coincide with reference upper helix


310


are indicated with x's. Coinciding portions of lower helix


340


and reference lower helix


320


are similarly indicated.




Upper helix


330


has associated helix angles that change from idle to notch


8


. Specifically, from idle to notch


6


, upper helix


330


has an associated slope (helix angle). From notch


6


to notch


8


, upper helix


330


has a different slope (helix angle).




More particularly, from idle to notch


6


, the helix angle of upper helix


330


is greater than that of reference upper helix


310


. That is, between the parallel lines corresponding to idle and notch


6


in

FIG. 3B

, the slope of upper helix


330


(with respect to a line perpendicular to the internal axis of the helix) is greater than the slope of reference upper helix


310


. At idle, upper helix


330


is displaced towards a top of plunger


110


(away from reference lower helix


320


) as compared with reference upper helix


310


. From notches


6


to


8


, the helix angle of upper helix


330


is substantially the same as that of reference upper helix


310


. That is, between the parallel lines corresponding to notch


6


and notch


8


, the slope of upper helix


330


and that of reference upper helix


310


are substantially the same, and the respective helices are coincident.




Accordingly, the exemplary design of upper helix


330


of

FIG. 3B

retards injection timing for idle to notch


6


relative to a design incorporating reference upper helix


310


. Such retarding may improve emissions for an engine whose fuel injection system includes plunger


110


.





FIG. 3C

shows an exemplary upper helix


350


and lower helix


360


according to an embodiment of the present invention. For purposes of comparison, reference upper helix


310


and reference lower helix


320


of

FIG. 3A

are shown in dashed lines in FIG.


3


C. Portions of upper helix


350


that coincide with reference upper helix


310


are indicated with x's. Coinciding portions of lower helix


360


and reference lower helix


320


are similarly indicated.




Upper helix


350


has associated helix angles that change from idle to notch


8


. Specifically, from idle to notch


5


, upper helix


350


has an associated slope (helix angle). From notch


5


to notch


7


, upper helix


350


has a different slope (helix angle). From notch


7


to notch


8


, upper helix


350


has yet a different slope (helix angle).




More particularly, from idle to notch


5


, upper helix


350


is displaced towards a top of plunger


110


(away from reference lower helix


320


) as compared with reference upper helix


310


. Between the parallel lines corresponding to idle and notch


5


in

FIG. 3C

, the slope of upper helix


350


is substantially the same as the slope of reference upper helix


310


. From notches


5


to


7


, the helix angle of upper helix


330


is greater than that of reference upper helix


310


. That is, between the parallel lines corresponding to notch


5


and notch


7


, the slope of upper helix


350


is greater than that of reference upper helix


310


.




From notches


7


to


8


, the helix angle of upper helix


330


is substantially the same as that of reference upper helix


310


. That is, between the parallel lines corresponding to notch


7


and notch


8


, the slope of upper helix


350


and that of reference upper helix


310


are substantially the same, and the respective helices are coincident.




Accordingly, the exemplary design of upper helix


350


of

FIG. 3C

retards injection timing for idle to notch


7


relative to a design incorporating reference upper helix


310


. Such retarding may improve emissions for an engine whose fuel injection system includes plunger


110


.





FIG. 4

illustrates a selected portion of plunger


110


according to another embodiment of the present invention. The portion shown corresponds to portion A identified in FIG.


1


. Upper helix


480


is generally shown in FIG.


4


. Parallel lines identify points along upper helix


480


that correspond to particular throttle settings. Although only portions of upper helix


480


corresponding to idle, notch


1


, notch


2


, and notch


3


throttle settings are shown, teachings herein may be applied for other throttle settings.




A reference helix


401


is shown for purposes of comparison. Reference helix


401


has an associated helix angle (slope) that does not change between an idle and notch


3


throttle setting.




Exemplary helices


420


and


410


are also shown in FIG.


4


. Helix


420


has a helix angle less than that of reference helix


401


. As such, helix


420


may retard injection timing for idle, notch


1


, notch


2


, and notch


3


settings as compared to a plunger that includes reference helix


401


. Alternatively, helix


410


has a helix angle greater than that of reference helix


401


. As such, helix


410


may advance injection timing for idle, notch


1


, notch


2


, and notch


3


settings as compared to a plunger that includes reference helix


401


.





FIG. 5

illustrates a selected portion of plunger


110


according to another embodiment of the present invention. The portion shown corresponds to portion A identified in FIG.


1


. Upper helix


580


is shown in FIG.


5


. Parallel lines identify points along upper helix


580


that correspond to particular throttle settings. Although only portions of upper helix


580


corresponding to idle, notch


1


, notch


2


, and notch


3


throttle settings are shown, teachings herein may be applied for other throttle settings.




Upper helix


580


has three associated helix angles (slopes) between idle and notch


3


settings. In particular, upper helix


580


has a first helix angle (slope) between the idle and notch


1


positions. At notch


1


, the helix angle increases—the illustrated slope becomes steeper—and injection timing is thus advanced. At notch


2


, the helix angle decreases—the illustrated slope becomes less steep—and injection timing is thus retarded. At notch


3


, the helix angle conforms to a helix angle of a reference helix (not shown), and timing is neither advanced nor retarded relative to the reference helix.




In various engines, helix timing changes may be complementary to flywheel timing changes. Accordingly, in some embodiments, both the design of an upper helix and flywheel timing adjustments may be employed to optimize injection timing. In an exemplary embodiment, helix angles for upper helix


580


of

FIG. 5

may be chosen such that, exclusive of flywheel timing adjustments, injection timing is altered by about −2° relative to a reference helix (not shown) at notch


1


; +2° at notch


2


; and 0° at notch


3


. Further optimization of injection timing may be achieved by adjusting flywheel timing.




In an embodiment similar to

FIG. 3B

above, upper helix


330


may be modified such that, (1) from idle to notch


5


, the helix angle of upper helix


330


is greater than that of reference upper helix


310


, and at idle, upper helix


330


is displaced towards a top of plunger


110


; and (2) from notches


5


to


8


, the helix angle of upper helix


330


is substantially the same as that of reference upper helix


310


, and those helices are coincident. Exemplary injection timing for such a modified injector is shown in Table 2. For purposes of comparison, timing values for an injector with reference upper helix


310


are also shown.












TABLE 2











Exemplary Injection Timings

















Injection










Timing of










Reference




Injection








Injector




Timing of








with




Injector with








Reference




Upper Helix







Throttle




Upper Helix




330 (as







Position




310




modified)




Difference











Notch 8




19° BTDC




 19° BTDC




   0°








(Before Top








Dead








Center)







Notch 7




17° BTDC




 17° BTDC




   0°







Notch 6




15° BTDC




 15° BTDC




   0°







Notch 5




14° BTDC




 13° BTDC




  −1°







Notch 4




13° BTDC




 11° BTDC




  −2°







Notch 3




 9° BTDC




6.5° BTDC




−2.5°







Notch 2




 7° BTDC




4.5° BTDC




−2.5°







Notch 1




 5° BTDC




1.5° BTDC




−3.5°







Idle




 4° BTDC




0.5° ATDC




−4.5°









(After Top









Dead Center)
















FIG. 6A

illustrates a plunger


110


with an upper helix


610


according to an embodiment of the present invention. Upper helix


610


may optimize injection timing for an engine that includes plunger


110


. As shown, upper helix


610


somewhat resembles a staircase. The specific form of upper helix


610


may depend on emissions data and/or empirical engine performance testing, as described above. In some embodiments, transitions in steps may be related to transitions in discrete throttle settings. For instance, for certain embodiments, the width of certain steps may span about 25° of the circumference of plunger


110


. Height of the various steps may vary.




In other embodiments, it may be desirable to optimize injection timing at higher throttle settings. For example, in a line-haul locomotive, which travels at high speeds much of the time, much of the EPA weighted emissions duty cycle is associated with high notches. Accordingly, for engines in such locomotives and engines in other analogous contexts, the upper helix of a plunger may be modified, for example, such that injection timing is optimized for high notches.

FIG. 6B

illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a plunger


110


that includes an upper helix


650


and a reference helix


670


. Upper helix


650


may reduce emissions for higher notches as compared with reference helix


670


. In another exemplary embodiment (not shown), the helix angle of an upper helix may not substantially change or may change only slightly (resembling a straight line, for example) at lower notches, and then may change more substantially at higher notches to optimize injection timing at those notches.





FIG. 7

illustrates a manufacturing process


700


according to an embodiment of the present invention. In task


701


, an engine throttle setting in need of optimized injection timing is identified. In task


710


, a helix angle capable of optimizing injection timing for the identified engine throttle setting is determined. The determined helix angle may advance, retard, or not alter injection timing. In task


720


, a plunger for a fuel injector is formed. An upper helix of the plunger may include at least two segmented portions between points on the plunger respectively corresponding to a first and second throttle position. The segmented portions have unequal associated helix angles. One of the segmented portions may correspond to the throttle setting identified in task


701


and may have an associated helix angle substantially equal to the helix angle determined in task


710


. In task


730


, a fuel injector that includes the plunger is assembled. The fuel injector may include a through-hardened chromium hot-work steel nozzle tip such as that described above.




In some embodiments, a machining device, such as a programmable device, may be employed to manufacture the plunger. For instance, a plunger with an upper helix having multiple unequal helix angles may be formed from scratch. Alternatively, an existing plunger, such as a plunger whose upper helix has substantially one helix angle, may be modified, such that the modified plunger has an upper helix having multiple unequal helix angles at desired positions of the plunger.




The foregoing description of embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use embodiments of the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments are possible, and the generic principles presented herein may be applied to other embodiments as well. For instance, embodiments herein may be applied in conjunction with other apparatus and methods, such as other technologies for reducing engine emissions and/or improving engine performance.




It is to be appreciated that the specific form of the upper and lower helices of a plunger may be varied in any of a multitude of ways consistent with the teachings of the present application. Helix angles may be varied to achieve desired performance criteria for particular implementations.




As such, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown above but rather is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed in any fashion herein.



Claims
  • 1. An injection mechanism adapted for use in a particular type of engine, comprising:a plunger having an upper helix ridge and a lower helix ridge, the helix ridges defining a channel encircling an axial portion of the plunger, the helix ridges determining opening and closing of fuel ports of the injection mechanism, the upper helix ridge having a ridge portion sloping from a first point on the plunger surface towards a second point on the plunger surface, the first point being associated with an idle throttle position of an injection mechanism, the second point being associated with a full throttle position of the injection mechanism, wherein the ridge portion includes at least two segmented portions between the first and second points, the at least two segmented portions having unequal associated helix angles, said helix angles being angled based on emissions data derived from said type of engine.
  • 2. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein:a first segmented portion among the at least two segmented portions retards injection timing for at least one predetermined throttle position of the injection mechanism relative to a reference injection mechanism, the reference injection mechanism including a plunger having an upper helix ridge with a ridge portion having substantially one associated helix angle between idle throttle and full throttle positions of the reference injection mechanism.
  • 3. The injection mechanism of claim 2, wherein a second segmented portion among the at least two segmented portions neither advances nor retards timing for a second predetermined throttle position of the injection mechanism relative to the reference injection mechanism.
  • 4. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein:a first segmented portion among the at least two segmented portions advances injection timing for at least one predetermined throttle position of the injection mechanism relative to a reference injection mechanism, the reference injection mechanism including a plunger having an upper helix ridge with a ridge portion having substantially one associated helix angle between idle throttle and full throttle positions of the reference injection mechanism.
  • 5. The injection mechanism of claim 4, wherein a second segmented portion among the at least two segmented portions retards timing for a second predetermined throttle position of the injection mechanism relative to the reference injection mechanism.
  • 6. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein the ridge portion includes at least three segmented portions between the first and second points, the at least three segmented portions having unequal associated helix angles.
  • 7. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein the engine is a diesel engine.
  • 8. The injection mechanism of claim 7, wherein the engine is mounted in a locomotive.
  • 9. The injection mechanism of claim 1, further comprising a nozzle tip formed, at least in part, of a chromium hot-work steel.
  • 10. The injection mechanism of claim 9, wherein the steel is substantially through hardened.
  • 11. The injection mechanism of claim 10, wherein the steel conforms to the H11 specification of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI).
  • 12. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein helix angles of the ridge portion do not substantially retard injection timing for a full throttle position of the injection mechanism relative to a reference injection mechanism, the reference injection mechanism including a plunger having an upper helix ridge with a ridge portion having substantially one associated helix angle between idle throttle and full throttle positions of the reference injection mechanism.
  • 13. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein a helix angle of the ridge portion changes at a point on the plunger surface that substantially corresponds to a transition between a first throttle position and a second throttle position.
  • 14. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein the injection mechanism is a fuel injector.
  • 15. The injection mechanism of claim 1, wherein the injection mechanism includes a fuel injection pump, the plunger being positioned in the fuel injection pump.
  • 16. A method comprising:identifying at least one engine throttle setting for which a reduced engine emission level is needed; determining a helix angle capable of optimizing injection timing for the at least one engine throttle setting; and forming a plunger for a fuel injection mechanism of the engine, the plunger having an upper helix ridge and a lower helix ridge, the upper helix ridge having a ridge portion sloping from a first point on the plunger surface towards a second point on the plunger surface, the first point being associated with an idle throttle position of an injection mechanism, the second point being associated with a full throttle position of the injection mechanism, wherein the ridge portion includes at least two segmented portions between the first and second points, the at least two segmented portions having unequal associated helix angles, and wherein a first segmented portion among the at least two segmented portions corresponds to the identified at least one throttle setting and has the determined helix angle.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the determined helix angle retards injection timing for the at least one engine throttle setting.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the determined helix angle advances injection timing for the at least one engine throttle setting.
  • 19. The method of claim 16, wherein the forming includes machining at least a portion of the ridge portion to create the unequal associated helix angles.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the forming includes programming a machining device to perform the machining.
  • 21. The method of claim 19, wherein, prior to the machining, the ridge portion of the plunger has substantially one associated helix angle between the first and second points.
  • 22. The method of claim 16, wherein the first segmented portion is associated with at least one predetermined throttle setting of the engine.
  • 23. The method of claim 16, further comprising:forming a nozzle tip, at least in part, of a chromium hot-work steel.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the steel is substantially through hardened.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the steel conforms to the H11 specification of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI).
  • 26. The method of claim 16, further comprising assembling the injection mechanism, the injection mechanism including the plunger.
  • 27. The method of claim 16, wherein the ridge portion includes at least three segmented portions between the first and second points, the at least three segmented portions having unequal associated helix angles.
  • 28. The method of claim 16, wherein the engine is a diesel engine.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the engine is mounted in a locomotive.
  • 30. The method of claim 16, wherein the injection mechanism is a fuel injector.
  • 31. The method of claim 16, wherein the injection mechanism includes a fuel injection pump, the plunger being positioned in the fuel injection pump.
  • 32. A diesel engine, comprising:a fuel system, the fuel system including a plurality of cylinders; a plurality of fuel injection mechanisms seated in respective cylinders, each injection mechanism including a body, a rotatable plunger slidably fitting within a bushing, and a nozzle tip, wherein the plunger has an upper helix ridge and a lower helix ridge, the helix ridges determining opening and closing of fuel ports of the injection mechanism, the upper helix ridge having a ridge portion sloping from a first point on the plunger surface towards a second point on the plunger surface, the first point being associated with a first throttle position, the second point being associated with a second throttle position, wherein the ridge portion includes at least two portions having unequal associated helix angles said helix angles being angled based on established emissions data; a rack and governor constructed and arranged to control rotation of the plunger; a fuel supply line to supply fuel to the injection mechanisms; and a fuel return line to return fuel to a fuel supply tank cooperating with the engine.
  • 33. The diesel engine of claim 32, wherein the diesel engine is mounted in a locomotive.
  • 34. The diesel engine of claim 32, wherein the injection mechanism is a fuel injector.
  • 35. The diesel engine of claim 32, wherein the injection mechanism includes a fuel injection pump, the plunger being positioned in the fuel injection pump.
  • 36. A method of manufacturing an emissions-efficient plunger for a fuel injection mechanism for a combustion engine, comprising:obtaining emissions data for said combustion engine at different throttle positions, said engine having different emissions at least at first and second throttle positions within said different throttle positions; determining a first helix angle for said plunger based on said emissions data for a first of said throttle positions, determining a second helix angle for said plunger based on said emissions data for a second of said throttle positions, said first helix angle being different from said second helix angle, and forming said plunger with a helix comprising at least a portion thereof with said first helix angle and a portion thereof with said second helix angle.
  • 37. A method according to claim 36, further comprising:determining combustion efficiency at said different throttle positions; and utilizing said combustion efficiency in addition to said emissions data in determining said first helix angle and said second helix angle.
  • 38. A method according to claim 37, wherein said throttle positions are discrete notch positions.
  • 39. A method of manufacturing an emissions-efficient plunger for a fuel injection mechanism for a combustion engine, comprising:obtaining emissions data for said combustion engine at different throttle positions while using an injection mechanism with a reference plunger having a reference helix, said reference helix having a reference helix angle, said reference helix angle defining an injection timing; determining, based on said emissions data, emissions-efficient helix angles at least at a first and a second throttle position within said different throttle positions, said emissions-efficient helix angle at said first throttle position being different from said emissions-efficient helix angle at said second throttle position; and forming an emissions-efficient plunger that includes said different emissions-efficient helix angles.
  • 40. A method according to claim 39, wherein said first throttle position is at a lower throttle position than said second throttle position, and wherein said forming comprises altering the emissions-efficient helix angle in comparison with said reference helix angle at said lower throttle position so that the injection timing is retarded in comparison with that for said reference helix.
  • 41. A fuel injector for an engine fuel system, said engine fuel system having a plurality of throttle positions, said throttle positions having corresponding emissions characteristics, said fuel injector comprising:an injector body; a plunger within said body, said plunger having an upper helix ridge and a lower helix ridge, the helix ridges defining a channel and determining opening and closing of fuel ports of the injector, the upper helix ridge having a ridge portion extending from a first portion towards a second portion, the first portion being associated with an idle throttle position, the second portion being associated with a full throttle position, said ridge portion including at least two segmented portions between the first and second portions, the at least two segmented portions corresponding to associated throttle positions between said idle and full throttle positions, said at least two segmented portions having unequal associated helix angles, said unequal helix angles of the at least two segmented portions being angled in accordance with emissions characteristics of the engine at the associated throttle positions.
US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
3566849 Frick Mar 1971 A
4327694 Henson et al. May 1982 A
4838232 Wich Jun 1989 A
4881506 Hoecker Nov 1989 A
4886640 Garner, Jr. et al. Dec 1989 A
5033442 Perr et al. Jul 1991 A
5048480 Price Sep 1991 A
5097812 Augustin Mar 1992 A
5396871 Faupel et al. Mar 1995 A
5409165 Carroll, III et al. Apr 1995 A
5487651 Guentert et al. Jan 1996 A
5638793 Rapp et al. Jun 1997 A
5685273 Johnson et al. Nov 1997 A
6009850 DeLuca Jan 2000 A
6082335 Kampichler et al. Jul 2000 A
6305358 Lukich Oct 2001 B1
6321723 Merkle et al. Nov 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
732982 Feb 1955 GB
1 431 747 Apr 1976 GB
62-17364 Jan 1987 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Paul G. Burman and Frank Deluca, “Fuel Injection and Controls for Internal Combustion Engines,” Simmons-Boardman Publishing Corporation, pp. 69 and 165, (1962).
EXHIBIT #1 as Described in Attached IDS.
GE Instructions on Large Bendix Fuel-Oil Injection Pump GE Parts 132X1254-1, 132X1535 and 132X1715, pp. 1-16 (Feb. 1991).