System and method of personalizing online marketing campaigns

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11475484
  • Patent Number
    11,475,484
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 22, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 18, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
Personalized electronic content is generated for display on a user computer. The content is generated by first matching a targeted user online identifier to one of a plurality of user online identifiers associated with a master ID in a database. Using online user behavior associated with the user online identifiers of the master ID, a preliminary set of personalized electronic content is generated. A set of content usage parameters is applied to the preliminary set of personalized electronic content to define the personalized electronic content, which is then transmitted and displayed on a user computer. The personalized electronic content may comprise targeted advertisement utilized to populate a webpage or an email template defined by an online marketing campaign.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.


BACKGROUND
1. The Field of the Present Disclosure

The present disclosure relates generally to electronic commerce, and more particularly, but not necessarily entirely, to personalization of electronically generated content.


2. Description of Related Art

The growth of electronic commerce (“e-commerce”) has led to a dramatic increase in the number of websites offering products and services for sale. E-commerce, in its broadest sense, refers generally to the conducting of business communications and transactions over networks through computers. More specifically, e-commerce refers to the buying and selling of goods and services, and the transfer of funds, through digital communications. As used herein, e-commerce refers to both of the above descriptions.


Many e-commerce websites are personalized such that each user may be presented with a unique experience to maximize the possibility of a sale. Personalization of the e-commerce website may be based on a user's historical online behavior and demographic information known about the user. Using the user's historical online behavior and known demographic information, a website attempts to predict the interests of the user. These predicted interests are then used to customize the presentation of the webpages of the website. For example, a webpage may include an advertisement for a product that is predicted to be of interest to a user based on the user's past purchase history. It will be appreciated that these personalization techniques may be utilized in conjunction with marketing campaigns.


To identify and track users, e-commerce websites employ user online identifiers. For example, websites may download small segments of data known as tracking cookies to the users' electronic devices. These tracking cookies typically contain some kind of ID number that allows the website to identify the electronic devices. Typically, when an electronic device accesses a website, the website requests that the electronic device's web browser provide the tracking cookie stored in the memory of the electronic device. Using the tracking cookie, the website is able to identify the electronic device's previous online history. For example, the website may be able to determine product listings previously accessed by an electronic device or online purchases made using the electronic device. The website may also be able to identify any user accounts associated with the electronic device. The website may also be able to access demographic information previously associated with the electronic device using the tracking cookie. This may include the gender, age, and interests of a user of the electronic device.


One drawback to the use of tracking cookies for personalization purposes is that the website cannot identify the specific users accessing the website based on the tracking cookies. That is, tracking cookies only identify the electronic device itself and not the actual user. (In reality, tracking cookies are actually browser specific.) Thus, any historical information stored by the website for a particular tracking cookie may be device specific and not user specific. For example, in a situation where multiple users use the same electronic device to access the same e-commerce website, the website does not know which of the users is actually using the electronic device at any given time. In this situation, personalization may be totally ineffective, or even offensive, because the personalization may be directed to a user that is not actually using the electronic device.


Personalization is further complicated by the fact that a user may access a website from multiple electronic devices used by multiple other users. For example, a user may access a website from a home computer, a work computer, and a smart phone, each of which may have its own tracking cookie. However, a spouse of the user may also use the same home computer making it difficult to know which user is actually online at any given time.


Personalization is even further complicated by the fact that a user may use multiple accounts with an e-commerce website or multiple users may use a single account to make purchases through an e-commerce website, such as in a familial situation. Likewise, users may have multiple email accounts through which they access an e-commerce website.


From the above, it can be seen that correctly identifying an actual user of an electronic device for personalization purposes is virtually impossible. Further, erroneous identification of the actual user using an electronic device may result in lost sales opportunities. For example, a user presented with a personalized webpage customized for a different user may lose interest and leave the website. In some instances, a user presented with personalized content targeted for another user may even be offended or annoyed. Likewise, a targeted user may not want another user to be targeted with personalized content intended for the targeted user.


While the above-described problems identifying actual users may never be eliminated in their entireties, it would be an improvement over the prior art to provide a system and method for enhanced personalization techniques that improve the probability of a sale in a multi-user, multi-device environment.


The prior art is thus characterized by several disadvantages that are addressed by the present disclosure. The present disclosure minimizes, and in some aspects eliminates, the above-mentioned failures, and other problems, by utilizing the methods and structural features described herein.


The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the present disclosure without undue experimentation. The features and advantages of the present disclosure may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the disclosure will become apparent from a consideration of the subsequent detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a diagram of a system for generating personalized electronic content according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 depicts a webpage template according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 depicts a webpage generated using the webpage template shown in FIG. 2 populated with personalized electronic content;



FIG. 4 is an exemplary table of user online identifiers associated with a master ID in a database;



FIG. 5 is an exemplary table showing content usage parameters for the user online identifiers shown in FIG. 4; and



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a process for generating personalized electronic content according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles in accordance with the disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and any additional applications of the principles of the disclosure as illustrated herein, which would normally occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the disclosure claimed.


In describing and claiming the present disclosure, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below. It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “having,” “characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.


Referring now to FIG. 1, there is depicted a system 20 for providing enhanced personalized electronic content to users. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized electronic content may be customized webpages of a website, such as an e-commerce website. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized electronic content may be a body of an email utilized in an email-marketing campaign. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized electronic content may be banner ads or other advertisements displayed on a website or in electronic communications. According to examples of embodiments of the present invention, the system 20 can be positioned to provide personalized electronic content on an online retailer/wholesaler website, sometimes referred to as an e-commerce website, or in the body of emails. The system 20 may include an electronic content generation server 21. In an embodiment, the server 21 is part of an e-commerce enterprise that hosts an e-commerce website, as is known to those of ordinary skill. In an embodiment, the server 21 is a bulk email server for generating emails for use in email-marketing campaigns.


The server 21 may include a processor 22 and memory 23. One or more second computers, e.g., user computers 27, positioned remote from and in communication with the web server 21 through an electronic communication network 30, such as the Internet or other internetwork. The system 20 can also include an electronic content generation program 24 stored on a tangible computer medium, such as, for example, one or more various types of memory, such as, for example, memory 23 of the server 21. The program 24 may contain instructions, that when executed by the processor 22, cause the processor 22 to provide personalized electronic content on the remote computers 27. The system 20 can also include a plurality of database servers (not shown) that warehouse data regarding e-commerce conducted through the system 20. The warehoused data may include user demographic and tracked online behavior. The data may include online advertisements created by a marketing department.


As understood by those skilled in the art, the memory 23 of the server 21 can include volatile and nonvolatile memory known to those skilled in the art including, for example, RAM, ROM, and magnetic or optical disks, just to name a few. It should also be understood by those skilled in the art that, although illustrated as a single server, the illustrated configuration of the server 21 is given by way of example and that other types of servers or computers configured according to various other methodologies known to those skilled in the art can be used. The server 21 shown schematically in FIG. 1 represents a server or server cluster or server farm and is not limited to any individual physical server. The server site may be deployed as a server farm or server cluster managed by a server-hosting provider. The number of servers and their architecture and configuration may be increased based on usage, demand, and capacity requirements for the system 20. Similarly, the database servers (not shown) each represent a server or server cluster or server farm and are not limited to any individual physical server or configuration.


As understood by those skilled in the art, the user computers 27 can be laptops, desktops, personal digital assistants or PDAs, cell phones, smart phones, mobile phones, servers, home computers, work computers, Internet-enabled devices, digital music players, smart TVs, or other types of processor-based computing devices. As known and understood by those skilled in the art, the network 30 can include an internet or world wide web of a plurality of computers/servers in communication with one or more other computers through a communication network, and/or portions of a local or other area network.


As further understood by those skilled in the art, the program 24 can be in the form of microcode, programs, routines, and symbolic languages that provide a specific set for sets of ordered operations that control the functioning of the hardware and direct its operation, as known and understood by those skilled in the art. The program 24, according to an embodiment of the present invention, also need not reside in its entirety in volatile memory, but can be selectively loaded, as necessary, according to various methodologies as known and understood by those skilled in the art. As further understood by those skilled in the art, the term “computer-readable medium” encompasses distribution media, intermediate storage media, execution memory of a computer, and any other medium or device capable of storing the program 24 implementing the functionality or processes of various embodiments of the present invention for later reading by a computer. The program 24 can be copied from the computer-readable medium to a hard disk or a similar intermediate storage medium. When the program 24, or portions thereof, are to be run, it can be loaded either from their distribution medium or their intermediate storage medium into the execution memory of the computer, configuring the computer to act in accordance with the functionality or method of various embodiments of this invention. All such operations are well known to those skilled in the art of computer systems.


According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the program 24 can include a set of instructions that when executed by the processor 22, cause the server 21, to perform the operations of generating personalized electronic content for transmission and display on the user computers 27. In an embodiment, the personalized electronic content may comprise one or more customized webpages dynamically generated by the server 21. The customized webpages may be displayed in web browsers running on the user computers 27. The customized webpages may include variations of layout, colors, themes, information, product recommendations, and advertisements. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized electronic content may be the body of an email sent to users. The users may view the emails using an email program running on the user computers 27. Thus, it will be appreciated that the personalized electronic content may be any electronic content that may be viewed on the user computers 27 by users and is not limited to just webpages and emails. For example, the personalized electronic content may be displayed to users on the remote computers 27 on a webpage, as viewed, for example, on a display 26 of one or more remote user computers 27, through the communication network 30, e.g., Internet. In an embodiment, the personalized content may include social media content, or any other content generated for display to a user, including but not limited to, product recommendations and advertisements of all sorts.


Referring now to FIG. 2, there is depicted an exemplary webpage template 100 that may be used by the server 21 to generate a webpage with personalized content that is displayed on one of the user computers 27 using a web browser. The template 100 may include features common to all of the webpages generated using the template 100, including an interactive product taxonomy search bar 102 that provides links to different product categories, a search box 104 that allows users to conduct searches within the website, and an interactive link 106 to a checkout feature. The template 100 may be stored in a database accessible to the server 21.


In addition, the template 100 may further include empty frames 108A-108D. The frames 108A-108D may be able to display personalized advertising content as determined by the server 21. In an embodiment, the frames 108A-108D are populated by the server 21 with personalized electronic content using the present invention. The content in the frames 108A-108D may be interactive such that when selected by a user, the content in the frames 108A-108D directs a user to product listings or product category pages. Thus, it will be appreciated that the personalized content displayed in the frames 108A-108D may be varied from user to user to provide a personalized webpage from the template 100. In an embodiment, the template 100 may be for a homepage of an e-commerce website. It will be noted that the larger the frame, the more weight is given to the frame. For example, frame 108A is considered to have more weight than frames 108B and 108C since it is larger.


Referring now to FIG. 3, where like reference numerals depict like components, there is depicted an exemplary personalized webpage 100A generated by the server 21 using the template 100 shown in FIG. 2. As can be observed, the frames 108A-108D have been populated with personalized electronic content in the form of targeted advertisements selected by the server 21. The targeted advertisements may be selected by the server 21 using the personalization techniques that are described herein. It is important to note that the above discussion in relation to FIGS. 2 and 3 may also apply to generating personalized emails to users using an email template. That is, an email template may be populated with personalized content in the same manner by the server 21 according to the principles of the present invention.


In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content generated by the server 21 may be targeted advertisements placed on a third-party website. For example, the personalized content may be a banner ad or other type of advertisement displayed on a news website. The banner ad may include an interactive link to an e-commerce website. Thus, it will be appreciated that personalized content may include product advertisements, targeted advertisements and product recommendations. In addition, personalized content may include customized search results and webpage layouts. In an embodiment, the personalized content may comprise at least one of targeted advertisements, product recommendations, banner advertisements, special promotions, webpages, invitations, emails, search results and sorted product lists. The manner of generating personalized electronic content will now be described below.


To generate personalized content, the electronic content generation server 21 tracks, stores, and maintains user interaction information under a master ID in a database. The master ID may be a numeric or alphanumeric identifier. In an embodiment, the master ID is a pre-existing master ID, and may comprise an online user identifier. In an illustrative embodiment, the user interaction information may include user interactions with websites, including e-commerce websites and any other type of websites. In an embodiment, the user interaction information may be tracked and recorded by another server, including a third-party tracking server as known to those of ordinary skill. The third-party tracking server may make the user interaction information available to the server 21. The user interaction information may include a wide range of data that may be utilized to assist in identifying and tracking a user or specific user computers 27 online, including user online identifiers.


In an illustrative embodiment, the user online identifiers may include user account information provided while creating a user account with a website. For example, users may be required to establish user accounts in order to conduct e-commerce with an e-commerce website. As known to those having ordinary skill, to establish a user account, a user may be required to complete a registration process that requires that the user provide a unique login ID and password. In addition, a user may be required to provide his or her first and last name, an email address, home address and a shipping address. The user may also be required to provide payment information, including a credit card number, billing name, and a billing address.


In an illustrative embodiment, the user online identifiers may include the tracking cookies of the user computers 27 through which a user accesses a user account on a website. For example, if a user is found to have accessed the same user account on an e-commerce website from multiple user computers 27, the server 21 tracks and records the tracking cookies of each of user computers 27 that accessed the same user account under the same master ID in the database. It will be appreciated a tracking cookie is a form of a unique tracking identifier. It will be further appreciated that as used herein, the term “unique tracking identifier” refers to tracking cookies, i.e., small pieces of data sent from a website and stored in a user's web browser, and data similar to tracking cookies, including unique identifiers used in a similar manner to tracking cookies to identify electronic devices.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 tracks and records multiple email addresses utilized to login to the same user account and associates those email addresses under the same master ID in the database. For example, a user may utilize both a work and a personal email address to access the same user account on a website. (This may occur when a user clicks on an interactive link provided in a solicited or unsolicited email sent to the user's email addresses). Both the work and personal email addresses would be stored under the same master ID in the database by the server 21.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may run an automated procedure to determine if a user can be matched to other user accounts registered with other websites. For example, a user may have multiple user accounts with multiple websites. To accomplish this task, the server 21 may attempt to match user information associated with a first user account known to be associated with a targeted user with the user information associated with a second user account. For example, the server 21 may attempt to match a user's name, physical address, or email address associated with a first user account with a user's name, physical address, or email address of a second user account. In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may compare the last name and the first few letters of the first name to determine if a match exists. If the server 21 matches the user information of the first user account with the user information of the second user account, then the second user account may be associated to the master ID in the database in conjunction with the first user account.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may run an automated procedure to determine if multiple email addresses are associated with the same physical address or household. To accomplish this task, the server 21 may attempt to match user information associated with a first email address known to be associated with a targeted user with user information associated with a second email account. In an illustrative embodiment, the user information may be a physical address associated with the email addresses. For example, if two email addresses are associated with the same physical address, a match has been found. If a match is found, the second email address may be associated with the master ID in the database along with the first email address.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may track and record the different IP addresses through which a user account on a website is accessed. The server 21 may also track and record the IP addresses of the user computers 27 that access a website. The server 21 may also track and record the IP addresses of emails through which a website is accessed. These IP addresses are associated with the same master ID in the database by the server 21.


Referring now to FIG. 4, as described above, the server 21 processes the user interaction information to centralize related user online identifiers under a single master ID, and more particularly, in a master ID table 200 stored in a database accessible to the server 21. In particular, when a user accesses a website for the first time, or establishes a user account, from one of the user computers 27 (see FIG. 1) through a web browser, the website places a tracking cookie in the memory of the user computer 27. The server 21 may associate the tracking cookie to a master ID by placing the tracking cookie in the master ID table 200. For purposes of the master ID, this “first” tracking cookie is referred to herein as the base tracking cookie 202 shown in FIG. 4.


When a user established a user account with the website through a registration process, this user account may become the base user account 205. During the registration process, the user may provide personal information, including login ID, password, first name, last name, and physical address.


In an illustrative embodiment, when a user provides an email address in association with creating the user account on the website, this email address becomes the base email address 204 associated with the master ID table 200 as shown in FIG. 4. In an embodiment, the base email address 204 may also be an email through which a user subscribes to a subscription or is provided by a lead generation. For example, if a user clicks through an advertisement in a solicited or unsolicited email, the user's email address may become the base email address 204.


As the server 21 tracks and records user interactions with a website, a user may login to his or her account from one or more of the other ones of the user computers 27. The website may transmit and store tracking cookies on the other ones of the user computers 27. The server 21 also stores these tracking cookies 206 of the other ones of the user computers 27 in the master ID table 200. In addition, if a user logs into his or her user account through email accounts that are not the base email account 204, the server 21 also stores these email addresses 208 in the master ID table 200.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may attempt to match other user accounts to the user account associated with the base user account 205. This may be done by matching personal information associated with each user account, such as name and physical address. If the server 21 matches other user accounts to the base user account 205, then those accounts are listed in the table 200 under matched user accounts 210. It will be appreciated that the matched user accounts 210 may be accounts on the same website as the base user account 205 or on other third-party websites.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may attempt to match other email addresses to the physical address associated with the base email address 204 through address matching. For example, if other email addresses are found to have the same physical address as that of the physical address associated with the base email address 204, then these other email addresses are stored in the table 200 as matched email addresses 212.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may also track and record the IP addresses for: (i) the user computer 27 associated with the base tracking cookie 202; (ii) the user computers 27 through which the user accesses his or her email; (iii) the user computers 27 through which the user logins to his or her account; and (4) any other user computer 27 that can be matched or linked to the user. These IP addresses are stored in the table 200 as IP address 214.


As can be observed, the user online identifiers in the master ID table 200 are logically divided into Levels I-IV. It will be appreciated that the logical division of the table 200 into Levels I-IV is for discussion purposes only and to assist in the disclosure of the present invention. That is, the table 200 may not actually be divided or arranged into separate levels when stored in a database. The division of the table 200 into Levels I-IV should therefore not be considered limiting on the scope of the present disclosure.


As can further be observed from FIG. 4, the user ID confidence level of the Level I data is the highest while the user ID confidence level of Level IV is the lowest. In practice, this means that personalization of electronic content based on the user online identifiers for Level I is likely to be more relevant than the personalization of electronic content for Level IV. In the context of e-commerce, the personalized content for Level I is more likely to result in a sale than for Levels II-IV. This may be true because of the decrease in the user ID confidence level. That is, users other than the targeted user may be utilizing the user online identifiers in Levels II-IV.


For example, personalizing electronic content solely based on matched IP addresses 214 may result in a user being presented with irrelevant and even offensive content because of the multiple numbers of other users that may be using the IP addresses 214. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the personalization of electronic content based on the data in Levels IV should be avoided. In fact, personalizing electronic content based on the data in Levels II-IV can be worthwhile if conducted pursuant to pre-defined usage parameters as will be discussed below.


Prior to proceeding, it is important to note that the manner in which the user online identifiers in table 200 may be utilized to generate personalized content in an embodiment of the present disclosure. In general, websites, or third-party tracking entities, track online user behavior to collect information about a user to predict product or product categories in which the user may be most interested. This generally involves the collection and analysis of click stream data and other online user behavior to create a score or profile that, as accurately as possible, identifies the user as a person who may be interested in certain products or content.


In an illustrative embodiment, collection of user online behavior data involves the tagging of websites to track and capture click stream data as the user browses a website. Data may be collected and stored in a database or data warehouse and are subjected to data mining algorithms to uncover patterns in browser behavior. The results of the data mining procedure are used to create the behavioral profile or score which may then be used to serve personalized content, including advertisements and product recommendations, matched to the predicted user behavior.


In an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure, user data, including historical online behavior, demographic information, purchase history, and user preferences, are not stored under a user's actual name, but may be instead stored by the server 21 under user online identifiers, including tracking cookies, user accounts, email addresses, and IP addresses as shown in FIG. 4. The online user behavior tracked and collected may include, without limitation, purchase history, products viewed, webpages viewed, items abandoned in a virtual shopping cart, terms utilized in formulating search queries, websites visited, and browsing behavior. In addition, demographic information known about a user, such as age, gender, interests, hobbies, etc. may also be utilized to in predicting a user's interests. User data may comprise both historical online user behavior and demographic information.


It will be appreciated that the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214 may each have its own tracked and captured user behavioral data, and user demographic data, stored in a database that may be utilized to generate personalized content, including targeted advertisements. In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 tracks and captures user online behavior for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214. In an illustrative embodiment, one or more third-party servers track and capture user online behavior and demographic data for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 is operable to generate personalized electronic content, such as targeted advertisements, based on the tracked and captured user online behavior and demographic data for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214. In an illustrative embodiment, one or more third-party servers are operable to generate and provide to the server 21 personalized electronic content, such as targeted advertisements, based on the tracked and captured user online behavior and user demographic information for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214.


It will be appreciated that using the online user behavior and demographic data associated with the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214 creates a more robust data set for personalization of electronically generated content.


In an illustrative embodiment, the present invention further contemplates applying content usage parameters to the electronically generated content to account for variations in the user ID confidence level. In particular, where the user ID confidence level is high, then the higher the degree of personalization of the personalized content. Where the user ID confidence level is low, the degree of personalization of the personalized content is reduced.


In this regard, the present invention takes into account that for some user online identifiers in FIG. 4, there is a possibility that the targeted user is not actually the user that will view the personalized content. For example, in the case where the user online identifier is an IP address, there is a possibility that the targeted user is not actually the user that will view the personalized content because multiple users may utilize the same IP address. Nevertheless, the present invention recognizes the benefit of still providing personalized content in this situation, albeit with a lesser degree of personalization so as not to drive away non-targeted users by presenting highly personalized content meant for another user.


Referring now to FIG. 5, there is depicted a table 300 containing an example of personalized content usage parameters for the different Levels I-IV of online user IDs stored in the master ID table 200 shown in FIG. 4. It will be appreciated that the usage parameters shown in FIG. 5 may vary in embodiments of the present disclosure. In an illustrative embodiment, the usage parameters determine the manner in which the electronically generated content is presented as well as filtering undesirable products or product categories from appearing in the personalized content.


As can be observed, for each of the Levels I-IV, there is provided in the table 300 the following rows: Recommended Messaging, Template, Adult Categories, Personal Sensitive, Personal Non-Sensitive, and Lowest Taxonomy Level. Each of these will now be explained.


Recommended Messaging refers to the prominence of the electronically generated content. That is, Recommended Messaging determines whether the electronically generated content is explicit or implicit in its targeting of a user. Explicit content makes clear that the user is being targeted, while implicit advertising does not make targeting clear. For example, where a user's previous online behavior predicts that the user may be interested in a diamond wedding ring previously viewed in a product listing, explicit content may include an image of the actual ring previously viewed by the user along with a statement inviting the user by name to purchase the ring. Implicit content, on the other hand, may simply include a general advertisement for wedding rings. Thus, explicit content is more personalized than implicit content.


The Template row in FIG. 5 refers to the fact that each of the Levels I-IV may have different templates. In an illustrative embodiment, the different templates may vary the degree of personalization of the electronically generated content. The templates may include webpage templates and email templates.


In an illustrative embodiment, the content usage parameters may include product filters. The Adult Categories row in FIG. 5 is an example of product categories that are automatically excluded, i.e., filtered, from appearing in personalized content for all of Levels I-IV. An example of an excluded adult category may be lingerie. The Personal Sensitive and Personal Non-Sensitive rows are example of product categories that are excluded or filtered for some of Levels I-IV but included in other ones of Levels I-IV. An example of a personal sensitive category may be caskets. An example of a personal non-sensitive category may be men's shoes.


It will be appreciated that some of the products or categories in a product taxonomy of an e-commerce website may be identified as adult, sensitive, or non-sensitive in a database. In an illustrative embodiment, this identification may be done manually by an operator of the server 21. In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may automate the identification.


Lowest Taxonomy Level refers to the lowest level of a product taxonomy tree that will be presented to a user for the Levels I-IV. Product level refers to the lowest node in a product taxonomy tree and may be an actual product offered for sale. Product level +1 refers to the next level just above the product level. Product level +2 refers to second level above the product level. Product level +3 refers to third level above the product level. In this regard, product level +1, product level +2, and product level +3, are subcategories in a product taxonomy tree while product level may be an actual product. (The arrow labeled “Product Taxonomy Level” in FIG. 4 represents this concept.)


From FIGS. 4 and 5, it can be observed that the higher the user ID confidence level, the greater the degree of personalization of the electronic content. Likewise, it can be observed that the lower the user ID confidence level, the lesser the degree of personalization of the electronic content. It can be further observed that each of Levels I-IV may have its own advertising preferences and product filters.


Referring now to FIG. 6, there is depicted a flow diagram 400 of a process according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure. It will be appreciated the process of the diagram 400 may be performed by the processor 22 of the server 21 as it executes the instructions of the program 24. It will be appreciated that the process of the diagram 400 may contain more or fewer steps than shown in FIG. 6. It will further be appreciated that the steps shown in the diagram 400 are not limited to any particular order and may be performed in a different order than the order shown.


At step 402, a plurality of user online identifiers are associated in a database under a master ID. The master ID may be a numeric or alphanumeric identifier. The user online identifiers may include tracking cookies, email addresses, user accounts, IP addresses, or any other user online identifier utilized to track and monitor user behavior while online. The tracking cookies may include unique identifying data stored in the memory of user computers as known to those of ordinary skill. The tracking cookies may include tracking cookies from multiple user computers used to login to the same user account on a website.


The email addresses may include an email address provided by a user in association with a subscription, account creation, or lead generation. The email addresses may also include multiple email addresses linked to a single user account through login. For example, the email addresses may include a home and work email address for a user that are utilized to login to the same user account on a website.


The user accounts may include user accounts matched to a known user account for a user. The user accounts may be matched by comparing personal identifying information such as last name, first name, and a physical or mailing address. A user account that has the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address is likely to be the same user of another user account that has the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address.


Likewise, the email accounts may include email accounts matched by a physical or mailing address to a known address for a user. Again, an email account that has associated therewith the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address is likely to be the same user of another email account that has the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address. The IP addresses may include IP addresses that are used by the user computers to access a user account on a website.


It will be appreciated that the user online identifiers associated with the master ID may each have stored in a database associated tracked online behavior and/or demographic information that may be utilized to generate personalized content based upon predicted behavior.


At step 404, a set of content usage parameters is defined or assigned for each of the user online identifiers. Each set may contain a recommended messaging type, i.e., explicit or implicit. Each set may further include a template variant. Each set may further include product filters that exclude certain categories of products or products in a product taxonomy tree and also identifies the lowest level in the product taxonomy tree that may be presented for the associated user online identifier.


At step 406, a targeted user online identifier for a user is provided, identified, or selected. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is obtained during a user's visit to a website. In association with the visit, the targeted user online identifier for the user is obtained. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier may be a tracking cookie stored on a user computer. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is an email account. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is a user account. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is an IP address. Multiple targeted user online identifiers may be obtained at this step. For example, the target user online identifiers may include a tracking cookie, a user account, and an IP address. In an illustrative embodiment, the user online identifier is a targeted email address obtained from a list of targeted users in conjunction with an email marketing campaign.


At step 408, the target user online identifier(s) obtained at step 406 are compared to a plurality of user online identifiers stored in the database under master IDs. If a match is found, the corresponding master ID is identified, selected, and stored.


At step 410, preliminary electronic content is generated using the user online behavior for one or more of the user online identifiers associated with the selected master ID. The preliminary electronic content may identify one or more entries in a product taxonomy tree that are predicted to be of interest to the user.


At step 412, the set of content usage parameters corresponding to the targeted user online identifier(s) obtained at step 406 is applied to the preliminary electronic content generated at step 410 to generate personalized content.


At step 414, the personalized content generated at step 412 is displayed on a display of the user's computer. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be transmitted over a network and displayed in a web browser on the user computer. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be used to populate a template. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be a targeted advertisement for a product or a service. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be a banner add displayed on a third-party website. In an illustrative embodiment, the generated personalized content may be in a body of an email. The personalized content may be interactive such that a user can click through to an e-commerce website as known to those of ordinary skill. It will be appreciated the personalized content may include content for multiple targeted user online identifiers. In this regard, multiple sets of content usage parameters may be used to generate the personalized content.


At step 416, the user may complete an e-commerce transaction for a product or server advertised in the personalized content on an e-commerce website.


Example 1

A user requests a homepage of an e-commerce website from a server through a web browser running on a user computer as known to those of ordinary skill. Prior to generating the homepage, the server requests a tracking cookie previously stored on the user computer. Upon receiving the tracking cookie, the server compares the targeted tracking cookie to a database of tracking cookies. Upon finding a match to the tracking cookie of the user computer in the database, the server identifies, selects, and stores a master ID associated with the tracking cookie found in the database. Using the master ID, the server is able to identify other user online identifiers associated with the master ID.


Using one or more of the user online identifiers associated with the master ID, the server is able to generate preliminary electronic content based on user online behavior that was previously tracked and stored. Then, the server applies to the preliminary electronic content the appropriate sets of content usage parameters to define the final personalized content. The personalized content is then utilized to populate a homepage template, which is served to the user computer and displayed in a web browser as the homepage. The personalized content may comprise targeted advertisements or product recommendations. (End of example.)


Those having ordinary skill in the relevant art will appreciate the advantages provide by the features of the present disclosure. For example, it is a feature of the present disclosure to provide an enhanced user identification system and method for use in e-commerce. Another feature of the present disclosure is to provide an enhanced user identification system and method for personalizing electronically generated content used for webpages, emails, and other electronic documents. It is a further feature of the present disclosure, in accordance with one aspect thereof, to provide a system for personalizing electronic content to increase the probability of a sale in an e-commerce environment.


In the foregoing Detailed Description, various features of the present disclosure are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description of the Disclosure by this reference, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the present disclosure.


It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present disclosure. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, and the appended claims, are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present disclosure has been shown in the drawings and described above with particularity and detail, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system for personalizing electronically generated content provided to a user computer over a network, said system comprising: a processor;a memory coupled to the processor;computer-readable instructions stored in the memory, that when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the operations of(i) associating a plurality of user online identifiers under a master ID by matching at least one of a user's name, physical address, and email address with a first online identifier to at least one of a user's name, physical address, and email address associated with a second user online identifier, and placing the master ID and associated plurality of user online identifiers in a database that comprises user online identifiers organized under master IDs,(ii) tracking, storing, and maintaining user data under the master ID, wherein the user data comprises user interaction information that has a connection to at least one of the user online identifiers matched to said master ID,(iii) defining or associating content usage parameters with each of the plurality of user online identifiers,(iv) providing, identifying, or selecting a target user online identifier for a user,(v) running an automated procedure for comparing the target user online identifier obtained in operation (iv) to the plurality of user online identifiers, based on the user data for each master ID in the database and, when a match is found, identifying, selecting, and storing the master ID corresponding to the match found,(vi) generating preliminary electronic content using the user online behavior for one or more of the user online identifiers associated with the stored master ID,(vii) generating personalized content by applying a set of content usage parameters corresponding to the target user online identifiers, and(viii) providing the personalized content generated in the operation (vii) to a user's electronic device.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises at least one of a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises at least two of a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises at least three of a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the target user online identifier comprises at least one of at least two user accounts, at least two email addresses, at least two unique tracking identifiers, and at least two IP addresses.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the content usage parameters for each of the plurality of user online identifiers designates a lowest preferred taxonomy level of a product taxonomy tree.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the content usage parameters for each of the plurality of user online identifiers define one or more product or product category filters.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the content usage parameters for each of the plurality of user online identifiers define a recommended messaging type.
  • 10. A method of personalizing electronically generated content for display on a user computer, said method comprising: (A) processing by a processor a plurality of user online identifiers under a master ID by matching at least one an attribute associated with a first user online identifier to at least one attribute associated with a second user online identifier and placing the master IDs and associated plurality of user online identifiers in a database that comprises user online identifiers organized under master IDs;(B) tracking, storing, and maintaining user data under the master ID, wherein the user data comprise user interaction information that has a connection to at least one of the user online identifiers matched to said master ID;(c) processing by the processor content usage parameters to associate them with the plurality of user online identifiers based on a user ID confidence level for each of the plurality of user online identifiers;(D) processing by the processor a target user online identifier for a user;(E) running an automated procedure by executing computer-readable instructions stored in a memory coupled to the processor for comparing the target user online identifier obtained in step (D) to the plurality of user online identifiers, based on the user data for each master ID<in the database and, when a match is found, identifying, selecting, and storing the master ID corresponding to the match found;(F) generating preliminary electronic content using the user online behavior for one or more of the user online identifiers associated with the stored master ID, wherein the preliminary electronic content identifies one or more entries in a product taxonomy tree that are predicted to be of interest to a user;(G) generating personalized content by applying a set of content usage parameters corresponding to the target user online identifier; and(H) providing the personalized content generated in the operation (F) to a user's electronic device.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises at least one of a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises at least two of a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises at least three of a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the plurality of user online identifiers comprises a user account, an email address, a unique tracking identifier, and an IP address.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the target user online identifier comprises at least one of at least two user accounts, at least two email addresses, at least two unique tracking identifiers, and at least two IP addresses.
  • 16. The method of claim 10, wherein the content usage parameters for each of the plurality of user online identifiers designates a lowest preferred taxonomy level of a product taxonomy tree.
  • 17. The method of claim 10, wherein the content usage parameters for each of the plurality of user online identifiers define one or more product or product category filters.
  • 18. The method of claim 10, wherein the content usage parameters for each of the plurality of user online identifiers define a recommended messaging type.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/968,248, filed Aug. 15, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,929,890, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (558)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymeyer May 1971 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4808987 Takeda et al. Feb 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4854516 Yamada Aug 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
RE33316 Katsuta et al. Aug 1990 E
5027110 Chang et al. Jun 1991 A
5053956 Donald et al. Oct 1991 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5301350 Rogan et al. Apr 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5347632 Filepp et al. Sep 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5377354 Scannell et al. Dec 1994 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5407433 Loomas Apr 1995 A
5411483 Loomas et al. May 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5493677 Balogh et al. Feb 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
5579471 Barber et al. Nov 1996 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5621790 Grossman et al. Apr 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5657389 Houvener Aug 1997 A
5664111 Nahan et al. Sep 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5721908 Lagarde et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5737599 Rowe et al. Apr 1998 A
5760917 Sheridan Jun 1998 A
5761496 Hattori Jun 1998 A
5761655 Hoffman Jun 1998 A
5761662 Dasan Jun 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5778367 Wesinger, Jr. et al. Jul 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794216 Brown Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5796395 de Hond Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5845265 Woolston Dec 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5890175 Wong et al. Mar 1999 A
5905975 Ausubel May 1999 A
5907547 Foldare et al. May 1999 A
5913215 Rubinstein et al. Jun 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5948040 DeLorme et al. Sep 1999 A
5948061 Merriman et al. Sep 1999 A
5970490 Morgenstern Oct 1999 A
5974396 Anderson et al. Oct 1999 A
5974412 Hazlehurst et al. Oct 1999 A
5986662 Argiro et al. Nov 1999 A
5987446 Corey et al. Nov 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
5999915 Nahan et al. Dec 1999 A
6012053 Pant et al. Jan 2000 A
6029141 Bezos et al. Feb 2000 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6045447 Yoshizawa et al. Apr 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6049797 Guha et al. Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058379 Odom et al. May 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6058428 Wang et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6065041 Lum et al. May 2000 A
6070125 Murphy et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6078914 Redfern Jun 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6128649 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6141010 Hoyle Oct 2000 A
6167382 Sparks et al. Dec 2000 A
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185558 Bowman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199077 Inala et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6202061 Khosla et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226412 Schwab May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6269238 Iggulden Jul 2001 B1
6271840 Finseth et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275820 Navin-Chandra et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275829 Angiulo et al. Aug 2001 B1
6356879 Aggarwal et al. Mar 2002 B2
6356905 Gershman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356908 Brown et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366899 Kernz Apr 2002 B1
6370527 Singhal Apr 2002 B1
6373933 Sarkki et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374260 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381510 Amidhozour et al. Apr 2002 B1
6415270 Rackson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6415320 Hess et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434556 Levin et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456307 Bates et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460020 Pool et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466917 Goyal et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484149 Jammes et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489968 Ortega et al. Dec 2002 B1
6522955 Colborn Feb 2003 B1
6523037 Monahan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6601061 Holt et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604107 Wang Aug 2003 B1
6625764 Dawson Sep 2003 B1
6643696 Davis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6661431 Stuart et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665838 Brown et al. Dec 2003 B1
6675178 Chinchar et al. Jan 2004 B1
6694436 Audebert Feb 2004 B1
6701310 Sugiura et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718536 Dupaquis Apr 2004 B2
6725268 Jacket et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728704 Mao et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732161 Hess et al. May 2004 B1
6732162 Wood et al. May 2004 B1
6801909 Delgado et al. Oct 2004 B2
6856963 Hurwitz Feb 2005 B1
6889054 Himmel et al. May 2005 B2
6907401 Vittal et al. Jun 2005 B1
6912505 Linden et al. Jun 2005 B2
6978273 Bonneau et al. Dec 2005 B1
7043450 Velez et al. May 2006 B2
7069242 Sheth et al. Jun 2006 B1
7076453 Jammes et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076504 Handel et al. Jul 2006 B1
7080030 Eglen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7099891 Harris et al. Aug 2006 B2
7100111 McElfresh et al. Aug 2006 B2
7100195 Underwood Aug 2006 B1
7117207 Kerschberg et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127416 Tenorio Oct 2006 B1
7165091 Lunenfeld Jan 2007 B2
7167910 Farnham et al. Jan 2007 B2
7216115 Walters et al. May 2007 B1
7240016 Sturgis et al. Jul 2007 B1
7254547 Beck et al. Aug 2007 B1
7305614 Chen et al. Dec 2007 B2
7318037 Solari Jan 2008 B2
7324966 Scheer Jan 2008 B2
7340249 Moran et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349668 Ilan et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353188 Yim et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366755 Cuomo et al. Apr 2008 B1
7379890 Myr et al. May 2008 B2
7380217 Gvelesiani May 2008 B2
7383320 Silberstein et al. Jun 2008 B1
7401025 Lokitz Jul 2008 B1
7447646 Agarwal et al. Nov 2008 B1
7451476 Banks et al. Nov 2008 B1
7454464 Puthenkulam et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457730 Degnan Nov 2008 B2
7493521 Li et al. Feb 2009 B1
7496525 Mitchell Feb 2009 B1
7496527 Silverstein et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496582 Farnham et al. Feb 2009 B2
7516094 Perkowski Apr 2009 B2
7539696 Greener et al. May 2009 B1
7546625 Kamangar Jun 2009 B1
7552067 Nephew et al. Jun 2009 B2
7565615 Ebert Jul 2009 B2
7606743 Orzell et al. Oct 2009 B2
7610212 Klett et al. Oct 2009 B2
7653573 Hayes, Jr. et al. Jan 2010 B2
7834883 Adams Nov 2010 B2
7904348 Johnson et al. Mar 2011 B2
7912748 Rosenberg et al. Mar 2011 B1
7921031 Crysel et al. Apr 2011 B2
7941751 Ebert May 2011 B2
7979340 MacDonald Korth et al. Jul 2011 B2
7983950 De Vita Jul 2011 B2
7983963 Byrne et al. Jul 2011 B2
8086643 Tenorio Dec 2011 B1
8112303 Eglen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8140989 Cohen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8166155 Rachmeler et al. Apr 2012 B1
8204799 Murray et al. Jun 2012 B1
8214264 Kasavin et al. Jul 2012 B2
8214804 Robertson Jul 2012 B2
8260852 Cselle Sep 2012 B1
8312056 Peng et al. Nov 2012 B1
8326662 Byrne et al. Dec 2012 B1
8370269 MacDonald-Korth et al. Feb 2013 B2
8370435 Bonefas et al. Feb 2013 B1
8392356 Stoner et al. Mar 2013 B2
8452691 MacDonald Korth et al. May 2013 B2
8473316 Panzitta et al. Jun 2013 B1
8494912 Fraser et al. Jul 2013 B2
8545265 Sakamoto et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577740 Murray et al. Nov 2013 B1
8583480 Byrne Nov 2013 B2
8630960 Gross Jan 2014 B2
8676632 Watson et al. Mar 2014 B1
8693494 Fiatal Apr 2014 B2
8719075 MacDonald Korth et al. May 2014 B2
8793650 Hilerio et al. Jul 2014 B2
9047341 Pan Jun 2015 B2
9047642 Byrne et al. Jun 2015 B2
9448692 Mierau et al. Sep 2016 B1
9483788 Martin Nov 2016 B2
9741080 Byrne Aug 2017 B1
9747622 Johnson et al. Aug 2017 B1
9805425 MacDonald-Korth et al. Oct 2017 B2
9928752 Byrne et al. Mar 2018 B2
9940659 Behbahani et al. Apr 2018 B1
10074118 Johnson et al. Sep 2018 B1
10102287 Martin Oct 2018 B2
10269081 Byrne Apr 2019 B1
10423997 MacDonald-Korth et al. Sep 2019 B2
10534845 Noursalehi et al. Jan 2020 B2
10769219 Martin Sep 2020 B1
10810654 Robertson et al. Oct 2020 B1
10853891 MacDonald-Korth et al. Dec 2020 B2
10872350 Hu et al. Dec 2020 B1
10896451 Johnson et al. Jan 2021 B1
10929890 Knab et al. Feb 2021 B2
10949876 Johnson et al. Mar 2021 B2
10970463 Noursalehi et al. Apr 2021 B2
10970769 Iqbal Apr 2021 B2
20010014868 Herz et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010034667 Petersen Oct 2001 A1
20010034668 Whitworth Oct 2001 A1
20010044751 Pugliese, III et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047290 Petras et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047308 Kaminsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010051996 Cooper et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002513 Chiasson Jan 2002 A1
20020007356 Rice et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013721 Dabbiere et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019763 Linden et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020022995 Miller et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020023059 Bari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026390 Ulenas et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029187 Meehan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038312 Donner et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040352 McCormick Apr 2002 A1
20020042738 Srinivasan et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049622 Lettich et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020056044 Andersson May 2002 A1
20020099578 Eicher, Jr. et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099579 Stowell et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099602 Moskowitz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107718 Morrill et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107853 Hofmann et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111826 Potter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120537 Morea et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120609 Lang et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123957 Notarius et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020124100 Adams Sep 2002 A1
20020129282 Hopkins Sep 2002 A1
20020133502 Rosenthal et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138399 Hayes et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147625 Kolke, Jr. Oct 2002 A1
20020156802 Takayama et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161648 Mason et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161664 Shaya et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020188777 Kraft et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194049 Boyd Dec 2002 A1
20020198784 Shaak et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198882 Linden et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004855 Dutta et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005046 Kavanagh et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009362 Cifani et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009392 Perkowski Jan 2003 A1
20030014400 Siegel Jan 2003 A1
20030028451 Ananian Feb 2003 A1
20030028605 Millett et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032409 Hutcheson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030035138 Schilling Feb 2003 A1
20030036914 Fitzpatrick et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040970 Miller Feb 2003 A1
20030041008 Grey et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046149 Wong Mar 2003 A1
20030069740 Zeidman Apr 2003 A1
20030069790 Kane Apr 2003 A1
20030069825 Hoffman et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083961 Bezos et al. May 2003 A1
20030088467 Culver May 2003 A1
20030088511 Korboulonis et al. May 2003 A1
20030093331 Childs et al. May 2003 A1
20030097352 Gulla et al. May 2003 A1
20030105682 Dicker et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110100 Wirth, Jr. Jun 2003 A1
20030119492 Timmins et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030131095 Kumhyr et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139969 Scroggie et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140007 Kramer et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140121 Adams Jul 2003 A1
20030158792 Perkowski Aug 2003 A1
20030163340 Fitzpatrick et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167213 Jammes et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030167222 Mehrotra et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177103 Ivanov et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187745 Hobday et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200156 Roseman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204449 Kotas et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030217002 Enborg Nov 2003 A1
20030220835 Barnes, Jr. Nov 2003 A1
20040006509 Mannik et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015416 Foster et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040029567 Timmins et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040041836 Zaner et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044563 Stein Mar 2004 A1
20040055017 Delpuch et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040058710 Timmins et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073476 Donahue et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078388 Melman Apr 2004 A1
20040107136 Nemirofsky et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117242 Conrad et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122083 Pettit et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122681 Ruvolo et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122735 Meshkin Jun 2004 A1
20040122855 Ruvolo et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128183 Challey et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128283 Wang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128320 Grove et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143731 Audebert et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148232 Fushimi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172323 Stamm Sep 2004 A1
20040172379 Mott et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174979 Hutton et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186766 Fellenstein et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199496 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199905 Fagin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204989 Dicker et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204991 Monahan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230989 Macey et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040240642 Crandell et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249727 Cook Jr. et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267717 Slackman Dec 2004 A1
20050002166 Dinnage et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010925 Khawand et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038733 Foster et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044254 Smith Feb 2005 A1
20050055306 Miller et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060664 Rogers Mar 2005 A1
20050097204 Horowitz et al. May 2005 A1
20050114229 Ackley et al. May 2005 A1
20050120311 Thrall Jun 2005 A1
20050131837 Sanctis et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144064 Calabria et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050193333 Ebert Sep 2005 A1
20050197846 Pezaris et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197950 Moya et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198031 Pezaris et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202390 Allen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203888 Woosley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216300 Appelman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050262067 Lee et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273378 MacDonald-Korth et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009994 Hogg et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010105 Sarakkai et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015498 Sarmiento et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031240 Eyal et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041638 Whittaker et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060058048 Kapoor et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069623 MacDonald Korth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060085251 Greene Apr 2006 A1
20060173817 Chowdhury et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206479 Mason Sep 2006 A1
20060218049 Walker et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060230035 Bailey et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235752 Kavanagh et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259360 Flinn et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271671 Hansen Nov 2006 A1
20060282304 Bedard et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005424 Arauz Jan 2007 A1
20070027760 Collins et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027814 Tuoriniemi Feb 2007 A1
20070073641 Perry et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070077025 Mino Apr 2007 A1
20070078726 MacDonald Korth et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070078849 Slothouber Apr 2007 A1
20070083437 Hamor Apr 2007 A1
20070094597 Rostom Apr 2007 A1
20070100803 Cava May 2007 A1
20070130090 Staib et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070160345 Sakai et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162379 Skinner Jul 2007 A1
20070174108 Monster Jul 2007 A1
20070192168 Van Luchene Aug 2007 A1
20070192181 Asdourian Aug 2007 A1
20070206606 Coleman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214048 Chan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226679 Jayamohan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233565 Herzog et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239534 Liu et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245013 Saraswathy et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070260520 Jha et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282666 Afeyan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288298 Gutierrez et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299743 Staib Dec 2007 A1
20080015938 Haddad et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021763 Merchant Jan 2008 A1
20080052152 Yufik Feb 2008 A1
20080071640 Nguyen Mar 2008 A1
20080082394 Floyd et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103893 Nagarajan et al. May 2008 A1
20080120342 Reed et al. May 2008 A1
20080126205 Evans et al. May 2008 A1
20080126476 Nicholas et al. May 2008 A1
20080133305 Yates et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140765 Kelaita et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162574 Gilbert Jul 2008 A1
20080195476 Marchese et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201218 Broder et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215456 West et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080288338 Wiseman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294536 Taylor et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300909 Rikhtverchik et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080301009 Plaster et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080305869 Konforty et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313010 Jepson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006190 Lucash et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030755 Altberg et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030775 Vieri Jan 2009 A1
20090037355 Brave et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090106080 Carrier et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106127 Purdy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090110181 Koenig et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119167 Kendall et al. May 2009 A1
20090157537 Miller Jun 2009 A1
20090164323 Byrne Jun 2009 A1
20090164442 Shani et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182589 Kendall et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204848 Kube et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222348 Ransom et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090222737 Liesche et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228918 Rolff et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234722 Evevsky Sep 2009 A1
20090240582 Sheldon-Neal et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090276284 Yost Nov 2009 A1
20090276305 Clopp Nov 2009 A1
20090292677 Kim Nov 2009 A1
20090293019 Raffel et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090313173 Singh et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100042684 Broms et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070448 Omoigui Mar 2010 A1
20100076816 Phillips Mar 2010 A1
20100076851 Jewell, Jr. Mar 2010 A1
20100094673 Lobo et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107123 Sareen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100145831 Esfandiar et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100146413 Yu Jun 2010 A1
20100228617 Ransom et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110010656 Mokotov Jan 2011 A1
20110055054 Glasson Mar 2011 A1
20110060621 Weller et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110103699 Ke et al. May 2011 A1
20110131253 Peukert et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145226 Gollapudi et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153383 Bhattacharjya et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153663 Koren et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110173076 Eggleston et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110191319 Nie et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110196802 Ellis et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110225050 Varghese Sep 2011 A1
20110231226 Golden Sep 2011 A1
20110231383 Smyth et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110258049 Ramer et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110271204 Jones et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276513 Erhart et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110289068 Teevan et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120005187 Chavanne Jan 2012 A1
20120030067 Pothukuchi et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120084135 Nissan et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120158715 Maghoul et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164619 Meer Jun 2012 A1
20120166299 Heinstein et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120203723 Huang et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120231424 Calman et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233312 Ramakumar et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120278388 Kleinbart et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284336 Schmidt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120323725 Johnston et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130031470 Daly, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130073392 Allen Mar 2013 A1
20130080200 Connolly et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080426 Chen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130085893 Bhardwaj et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130144870 Gupta et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130145254 Masuko et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151331 Avner et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151388 Falkenborg et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130185164 Pottjegort Jul 2013 A1
20130191409 Zeng et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130254059 Teo Sep 2013 A1
20130268561 Christie et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140019313 Hu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025509 Reisz et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032544 Mathieu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140114680 Mills et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140136290 Schiestl et al. May 2014 A1
20140172652 Pobbathi et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180758 Agarwal et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140200959 Sarb Jul 2014 A1
20140259056 Grusd Sep 2014 A1
20140289005 Laing et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140337090 Tavares Nov 2014 A1
20140372415 Fernandez-Ruis Dec 2014 A1
20150019958 Ying et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150089524 Cremonesi et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150142543 Lellouche May 2015 A1
20150286742 Zhang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150287066 Wortley et al. Oct 2015 A1
20170344622 Islam et al. Nov 2017 A1
20200065357 Noursalehi et al. Feb 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
2253543 Mar 1997 CA
2347812 May 2000 CA
0636993 Apr 1999 EP
0807891 May 2000 EP
1241603 Sep 2002 EP
2397400 Jul 2004 GB
2424098 Sep 2006 GB
2001283083 Dec 2001 JP
2002318935 Oct 2002 JP
2007021920 Feb 2007 JP
2009505238 Feb 2009 JP
WO1997017663 May 1997 WO
WO1998032289 Jul 1998 WO
WO1998047082 Oct 1998 WO
WO1998049641 Nov 1998 WO
WO1999059283 Nov 1999 WO
WO2000025218 May 2000 WO
WO2001009803 Feb 2001 WO
WO2001082135 Nov 2001 WO
WO2001097099 Dec 2001 WO
WO2002037234 May 2002 WO
WO2003094080 Nov 2003 WO
WO2007021920 Feb 2007 WO
WO2012093410 Jul 2012 WO
WO2015116038 Aug 2015 WO
WO2015176071 Nov 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (115)
Entry
Gallagher et al. A framework for targeting banner advertising on the internet. IEEE, pp. 265-274. (Year: 1997).
K. Gallagher and J. Parsons, “A framework for targeting banner advertising on the Internet,” Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1997, pp. 265-274 vol.4, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.1997.663397. (Year: 1997).
Lee, “Aucnet: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions,” Electronic Market—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 24-28, vol. 7, No. 4.
T.Y. Lee, S. Li and R. Wei, “Needs-Centric Searching and Ranking Based on Customer Reviews,” 2008 10th IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services, Washington, DC, 2008, pp. 128-135. (Year: 2008).
Levy, Michael, and Dhruv Grewal. “Supply chain management in a networked economy.” Journal Retailing 76.4 (2000): 415-429.
LIVE365 press release, “Live365 to Offer Opt-In Advertising on its Website,” Oct. 15, 2004.
London Business School, “Overture and Google: Internet Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising Options,” Mar. 2003.
M2 Presswire, “Palm, Inc.: Palm unveils new web browser optimised for handhelds; HTML browser offers highspeed web-browsing option,” Mar. 13, 2002.
Malone et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,” Communications of the ACM, Jun. 1987, pp. 484-497, vol. 30, No. 6.
Mansell et al., “Electronic Trading Networks: The Route to Competitive Advantage?” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Mardesich, “Onsale takes auction gavel electronic,” Computer Reseller News, Jul. 8, 1996, pp. 2, 32.
Marteau, “Shop with One Click, Anywhere, Anytime,” Information Management and Consulting, 2000, pp. 44-46, vol. 15, No. 4.
Massimb et al., “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 39-49.
McGinnity, “Build Your Weapon,” PC Magazine, Apr. 24, 2011, printed from www.pcmag.com/print_article2?0,1217, a%253D3955,00.asp.
Meade, “Visual 360: a performance appraisal system that's ‘fun,’”HR Magazine, 44, 7, 118(3), Jul. 1999.
“Mediappraise: Mediappraise Receives National Award for Web-Based Technology That Enables Companies to Solve Thomy HR Problem,” Dec. 14, 1998.
Medvinsky et al., “Electronic Currency for the Internet,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
metails.com, www.metails.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter and p. 33.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter, back matter, and pp. 479, 486.
Neches, “Fast—A Research Project in Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 4 pages, vol. 3., No. 3.
Neisser, “Which is better for Social Media Monitoring: TweetDeck or SproutSocial” Mar. 17, 2011, Social Media Examiner, https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/which-is-better-for-social-media-monitoring-tweetdeck-or-sproutsocial/.
Neo, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Dec. 1992, pp. 278-288, vol. 1, No. 5.
O'Mahony, “An X.500-based Product Catalogue,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online: Unique Internet retail services debuts with week-long charity auction for the Computer Museum in Boston,” May 24, 1995, printed from www.dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?dwcommand,DWEBPRINT%20810-489267.
“Onsale joins fray as online shopping pcks up speed: Internet Booms,” Comptuer Reseller News, Jun. 5, 1995.
Palm, Inc., PalmTM Web Pro Handbook, copyright 2002-2003.
Post et al., “Application of Auctions as a Pricing Mechanism for the Interchange of Electric Power,” IEEE Transactions of Power Systems, Aug. 1995, pp. 1580-1584, vol. 10, No. 3.
Preist et al., “Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction,” International Conference on Information and Computation, Proceedings of the first international conference on information and computation economies, Oct. 25-28, 1998, Charleston, United States, pp. 11-18.
Qualcomm, “Brew Developer Support,” printed from web.archive.org/web/20020209194207/http://www.qualcomm.com/brew/developer/support/kb/52.html on Aug. 30, 2007.
RCR Wireless News, “Lockheed Martin to use 2Roam's technology for wireless platform,” RCR Wireless News, Sep. 10, 2001.
Reck, “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System,” J. Systems Software, 1993, pp. 245-252, vol. 21.
Reck, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 17-23, vol. 7, No. 4.
repcheck.com, www.repcheck.com homepage, printed from web.archive.org/web/20020330183132/http://repcheck.com on Sep. 5, 2009.
Resnick et al., “Reputation Systems,” Communications of the ACM, Dec. 2000, pp. 45-48, vol. 43, No. 12.
Rockoff et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 1995, pp. 10-16, vol. 5, No. 4.
Rodriguez, Camille, HootSuite vs. social Oomph vs. Tweekdeck, Jan. 4, 2012, http://polkadotimpressions.com/2012/01/04/hootsuite-vs-social-oopmphvs.tweetdeck/ (Year: 2012).
Rose, “Vendors strive to undo Adobe lock-hold,” Computer Reseller News, Feb. 5., 1996, n 66669, p. 71(7).
Ross, David Frederick, Frederick S. Weston, and W. Stephen. Introduction to supply chain management technologies. CRC Press, 2010.
Rysavy, “Mobile-commerce ASPs do the legwork,” Network Computing, Jan. 22, 2001, p. 71, 6 pgs. , vol. 12, No. 2.
Saunders, “AdFlight to Offer WAP Ads,” Oct. 17, 2000, printed from clickz.com/487531/print.
Schaffer, Neil, The Top 20 Twitter clients—HootSuite, TweetDeck and More, Jan. 31, 2012, https://maximizesocialbusinss.com/top-20-twitter-clients-2012-9175/ (Year: 2012).
Schmid, “Electronic Markets,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Schwankert, “Matsushita Taps 2Roam for Wireless Solutions,” www.internetnews.com/bus-news.article. php/674811, Feb. 2, 2001.
Sen, “Inventory and Pricing Models for Perishable Products,” Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation—University of Southern California, Aug. 2000.
Siegmann, “Nowhere to go but up,” PC Week, Oct. 23, 1995, 3 pages, vol. 12, No. 42.
Telephony Staff, “Air-ASP,” Telephony Online, Oct. 2, 2000, 3 pages.
Teo, “Organizational Factors of Success in Using EDIS: A Survey of Tradenet Participants,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Tjostheim et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web,” printed from www.nr.no/gem/elcom/puplikasjoner/enter98e.html on Jun. 10, 1990, 10 pages.
Turban, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 5 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
ubid.com, “How do I Updated my Address, Phone, Credit Card, Password, etc.?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208113903/www.ubid.com/help/topic13asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
ubid.com, “How do I track my shipment?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010331032659/www.ubid.com/help/topic27.asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
ubid.com, “Can I track all of my bids from My Page?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208114049/www.ubid.com/help/topic14.asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
Van Heck et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 6 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
Verizon Wireless, “Verizon Wireless Customers Get it NowSM; Get Games, Get Pix, Get Ring Tones and Get going in Full Color,” press release to Prnewswire, Sep. 23, 2002.
Warbelow et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System,” Harvard Business School 9-190-001, Jul. 19, 1989, Rev. Apr. 12, 1996, pp. 1-15.
Weber, “How Financial Markets are Going on-line,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Wireless Internet, “DailyShopper Selects 2Roam to Enable Mobile Customers to Retrieve Nearby Sales and Promotions Information,” Wireless Internet, Apr. 2001.
Wireless Week, “Verizon Wireless Gets Going on Brew Agenda,” Wireless Week, Sep. 23, 2002.
xchanger.net, webpage printed from www.auctiva.com/showcases/as_4sale.asp?uid=exchanger, undated but at least as early as Oct. 12, 2000.
Yu et al., “Distributed Reputation Management for Electronic Commerce,” Computational Intelligence, 2002, pp. 535-549, vol. 18, No. 4.
Zetmeir, Auction Incentive Marketing, print of all pages of website found at home.earthlink.net/˜bidpointz/ made Oct. 8, 2004.
Zimmermann, “Integration of Financial Services: The TeleCounter,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Zwass, “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, pp. 3-23, vol. 1, No. 1.
Message Passing from Wikipedia, archived May 6, 2016, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/message_passing, 4 pages.
Di et al., “A New Implementation for Ontology Mapping Based enterprise Semantic Interoperation,” by Xiaofeng Di and Yushun Fan, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vols. 16-19 (2009), pp. 644-648 (Year:2009).
Nicolle et a., “XML Integration and Toolkit for B2B Applications,” by Christophe Nicolle, Kokou Yetongnon, and Jean-Claude Simon, Journal of Database Management, Oct.-Dec. 2003 (Year: 2003).
V. Aksakalli, Optimizing direct response in Internet display advertising, Elsevier, vol. 11, Issue 3, May-Jun. 2012, pp. 229-240. (Year: 2012).
Alex, Neil,“Optimizing Search Results in Elasticsearch with Scoring and Boosting”, Mar. 18, 2015, Qbox.io, accessed at [https://qbox.io/blog/optimizing-search-results-in-elasticsearch0with-scoring-and-boosting] (year: 2015).
Hybrid algorithms for recommending new items. Cremonesi et al., ResearchGate, Google, (year:2011).
2Roam, Inc., multiple archived pages of www.2roam.com retrieved via Internet Archive Wayback Machine on Jun. 10, 2008.
Alt et al., “Bibliography on Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 5 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Alt et al., “Computer Integrated Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 1, No. 3.
Anonymous, Image manipulation (image-editing software and image-manipulation systems)(Seybold Special Report, Part II), Seybold Reporton Publishing Systems, May 15, 1995, pS35(9), vol. 24, No. 18.
auctionwatch.com, multiple pages—including search results for “expedition,” printed Apr. 21, 2011.
auctiva.com, multiple pages, undated but website copyright date is “1999-2000.”
Ball et al., “Supply chain infrastructures: system integration and information sharing,” ACM SIGMOD Record, 2002, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 61-66.
Berger et al., “Random Ultiple-Access Communication and Group Testing,” IEEE, 1984.
Braganza, “IS Resarch at Cranfield—A Look at the Future,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Brecht et al., “The IM 2000 Research Programme,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Business Wire business/technology editors, “Sellers Flock to OutletZoo.com as New Automatic Price Drop Method Moves Excess Inventory Online,” Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Expands in Real Estate Market with Adoption of Rimfire on realtor.com,” Business Wire, Nov. 8, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Shows Strong Revenue Growth in Internet Imaging Business,” Business Wire, Nov. 10, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Partners with Pumatech to Delivery Wireless Alerts,” Business Wire, Dec. 18, 2000.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Takes eHow's How-to Solutions Wireless: With 2Roam, the Web's One-Stop Source for getting Things Done is on More Wireless Devices, with Ability to Purchase its Products from Anywhere,” Business Wire, Oct. 2, 2000.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Drives Hertz to the Wireless Web: Number One Car Rental Company to Provide Customers Wireless Access from Any Device,” Business Wire, Aug. 7, 2001.
buy.com, www.buy.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004.
Chen et al., “Detecting Web Page Structure for Adaptive Viewing on Small Form Factor Devices,” ACM, May 20-24, 2003.
Chen, M. (2007). Knowledge assisted data management and retrieval in multimedia database systems (Order No. 3268643).
Y.K. Choi and S. K. Kim, “An auxiliary reccomendation system for repetitively purchasing items in E-commerce,” 2014 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP), Bangkok, 2014, pp. 96-98. (Year 2014).
Clarke, “Research Programme in Supra-organizational Systems,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Clemons et al., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities markets,” Proceedings of the twelfth International conference on information systems, New York, New York, United States, pp. 53-64, 1991.
Fan, J., Keim, F.A., Gao, Y., Luo, H. and Li, Z. (2009). JustClick: Personalized Image Recommendation via Exploratory Search from Large-Scale Flickr Images. Feb. 2009. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 19(2), p. 2730288. (Year: 2009).
friendster.com, homepage and “more info” pages, printed Apr. 29, 2004.
Google News archive search for “2Roam marketing” performed over the date range 2000-2003.
Google News archive search for “2Roam SMS” performed over the date range 2000-2008.
Grabowski et al., “Mobile-enabled grid middleware and/or grid gateways,” GridLab—A Grid Application Toolkit and Testbed, Work Package 12—Access for Mobile Users, Jun. 3, 2003.
Graham, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Jul. 1993, 4 pages, vol. 8, No. 2.
Gunthorpe et al., “Portfolio Composition and the Investment Horizon,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 51-56.
Halperin, “Toward a Process Handbook for Organizational Coordination Processes,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Hess et al., “Computerized Loan Origination Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, pp. 251-275.
IBM, “Anyonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1996, pp. 363-366, vol. 39, No. 3.
IBM, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1995, pp. 83-84, vol. 38, No. 1.
Icrossing, “Icrossing Search Synergy: Natural & Paid Search Symbiosis,” Mar. 2007.
IEEE 100—The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms, Seventh Edition, 2000. Entire book cited; table of contents, source list, and terms beginning with A included. ISBN 0-7381-2601-2a.
Ives et al., “Editor's Comments—MISQ Central: Creating a New Intellectual Infrastructure,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, p. xxxv.
Joshi, “Information visibility and its effect on supply chain dynamics,” Ph D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000 (fig. 4.5; p. 45).
Klein, “Information Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, pp. 11-12, vol. 3, No. 3.
Klein, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 4 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
Kubicek, “The Organization Gap,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
S. Kulkarni, A. M. Sankpal, R.R. Mudholkar and Kirankumari, “Recommendation engine: Matching individual/group profiles for better shopping experience,” 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies (ICACT), Rajampet, 2013, pp. 1-6. (Year: 2013).
Kuula, “Telematic Services in Finland,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lalonde, “The EDI World Institute: An International Approach,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lee et al., “Intelligent Electronic Trading for Commodity Exchanges,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lee et al., “Electronic Brokerage and Electronic Auction: The Impact of IT on Market Structures,” Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1996, pp. 397-406.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13968248 Aug 2013 US
Child 17181728 US