Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
1. The Field of the Present Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to electronic commerce, and more particularly, but not necessarily entirely, to personalization of electronically generated content.
2. Description of Related Art
The growth of electronic commerce (“e-commerce”) has led to a dramatic increase in the number of websites offering products and services for sale. E-commerce, in its broadest sense, refers generally to the conducting of business communications and transactions over networks through computers. More specifically, e-commerce refers to the buying and selling of goods and services, and the transfer of funds, through digital communications. As used herein, e-commerce refers to both of the above descriptions.
Many e-commerce websites are personalized such that each user may be presented with a unique experience to maximize the possibility of a sale. Personalization of the e-commerce website may be based on a user's historical online behavior and demographic information known about the user. Using the user's historical online behavior and known demographic information, a website attempts to predict the interests of the user. These predicted interests are then used to customize the presentation of the webpages of the website. For example, a webpage may include an advertisement for a product that is predicted to be of interest to a user based on the user's past purchase history. It will be appreciated that these personalization techniques may be utilized in conjunction with marketing campaigns.
To identify and track users, e-commerce websites employ user online identifiers. For example, websites may download small segments of data known as tracking cookies to the users' electronic devices. These tracking cookies typically contain some kind of ID number that allows the website to identify the electronic devices. Typically, when an electronic device accesses a website, the website requests that the electronic device's web browser provide the tracking cookie stored in the memory of the electronic device. Using the tracking cookie, the website is able to identify the electronic device's previous online history. For example, the website may be able to determine product listings previously accessed by an electronic device or online purchases made using the electronic device. The website may also be able to identify any user accounts associated with the electronic device. The website may also be able to access demographic information previously associated with the electronic device using the tracking cookie. This may include the gender, age, and interests of a user of the electronic device.
One drawback to the use of tracking cookies for personalization purposes is that the website cannot identify the specific users accessing the website based on the tracking cookies. That is, tracking cookies only identify the electronic device itself and not the actual user. (In reality, tracking cookies are actually browser specific.) Thus, any historical information stored by the website for a particular tracking cookie may be device specific and not user specific. For example, in a situation where multiple users use the same electronic device to access the same e-commerce website, the website does not know which of the users is actually using the electronic device at any given time. In this situation, personalization may be totally ineffective, or even offensive, because the personalization may be directed to a user that is not actually using the electronic device.
Personalization is further complicated by the fact that a user may access a website from multiple electronic devices used by multiple other users. For example, a user may access a website from a home computer, a work computer, and a smart phone, each of which may have its own tracking cookie. However, a spouse of the user may also use the same home computer making it difficult to know which user is actually online at any given time.
Personalization is even further complicated by the fact that a user may use multiple accounts with an e-commerce website or multiple users may use a single account to make purchases through an e-commerce website, such as in a familial situation. Likewise, users may have multiple email accounts through which they access an e-commerce website.
From the above, it can be seen that correctly identifying an actual user of an electronic device for personalization purposes is virtually impossible. Further, erroneous identification of the actual user using an electronic device may result in lost sales opportunities. For example, a user presented with a personalized webpage customized for a different user may lose interest and leave the website. In some instances, a user presented with personalized content targeted for another user may even be offended or annoyed. Likewise, a targeted user may not want another user to be targeted with personalized content intended for the targeted user.
While the above-described problems identifying actual users may never be eliminated in their entireties, it would be an improvement over the prior art to provide a system and method for enhanced personalization techniques that improve the probability of a sale in a multi-user, multi-device environment.
The prior art is thus characterized by several disadvantages that are addressed by the present disclosure. The present disclosure minimizes, and in some aspects eliminates, the above-mentioned failures, and other problems, by utilizing the methods and structural features described herein.
The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the present disclosure without undue experimentation. The features and advantages of the present disclosure may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The features and advantages of the disclosure will become apparent from a consideration of the subsequent detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles in accordance with the disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and any additional applications of the principles of the disclosure as illustrated herein, which would normally occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the disclosure claimed.
In describing and claiming the present disclosure, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below. It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “having,” “characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.
Referring now to
According to examples of embodiments of the present invention, the system 20 can be positioned to provide personalized electronic content on an online retailer/wholesaler website, sometimes referred to as an e-commerce website, or in the body of emails. The system 20 may include an electronic content generation server 21. In an embodiment, the server 21 is part of an e-commerce enterprise that hosts an e-commerce website, as is known to those of ordinary skill. In an embodiment, the server 21 is a bulk email server for generating emails for use in email-marketing campaigns.
The server 21 may include a processor 22 and memory 23. One or more second computers, e.g., user computers 27, positioned remote from and in communication with the web server 21 through an electronic communication network 30, such as the Internet or other internetwork. The system 20 can also include an electronic content generation program 24 stored on a tangible computer medium, such as, for example, one or more various types of memory, such as, for example, memory 23 of the server 21. The program 24 may contain instructions, that when executed by the processor 22, cause the processor 22 to provide personalized electronic content on the remote computers 27. The system 20 can also include a plurality of database servers (not shown) that warehouse data regarding e-commerce conducted through the system 20. The warehoused data may include user demographic and tracked online behavior. The data may include online advertisements created by a marketing department.
As understood by those skilled in the art, the memory 23 of the server 21 can include volatile and nonvolatile memory known to those skilled in the art including, for example, RAM, ROM, and magnetic or optical disks, just to name a few. It should also be understood by those skilled in the art that, although illustrated as a single server, the illustrated configuration of the server 21 is given by way of example and that other types of servers or computers configured according to various other methodologies known to those skilled in the art can be used. The server 21 shown schematically in
As understood by those skilled in the art, the user computers 27 can be laptops, desktops, personal digital assistants or PDAs, cell phones, smart phones, mobile phones, servers, home computers, work computers, Internet-enabled devices, digital music players, smart TVs, or other types of processor-based computing devices. As known and understood by those skilled in the art, the network 30 can include an internet or world wide web of a plurality of computers/servers in communication with one or more other computers through a communication network, and/or portions of a local or other area network.
As further understood by those skilled in the art, the program 24 can be in the form of microcode, programs, routines, and symbolic languages that provide a specific set for sets of ordered operations that control the functioning of the hardware and direct its operation, as known and understood by those skilled in the art. The program 24, according to an embodiment of the present invention, also need not reside in its entirety in volatile memory, but can be selectively loaded, as necessary, according to various methodologies as known and understood by those skilled in the art. As further understood by those skilled in the art, the term “computer-readable medium” encompasses distribution media, intermediate storage media, execution memory of a computer, and any other medium or device capable of storing the program 24 implementing the functionality or processes of various embodiments of the present invention for later reading by a computer. The program 24 can be copied from the computer-readable medium to a hard disk or a similar intermediate storage medium. When the program 24, or portions thereof, are to be run, it can be loaded either from their distribution medium or their intermediate storage medium into the execution memory of the computer, configuring the computer to act in accordance with the functionality or method of various embodiments of this invention. All such operations are well known to those skilled in the art of computer systems.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the program 24 can include a set of instructions that when executed by the processor 22, cause the server 21, to perform the operations of generating personalized electronic content for transmission and display on the user computers 27. In an embodiment, the personalized electronic content may comprise one or more customized webpages dynamically generated by the server 21. The customized webpages may be displayed in web browsers running on the user computers 27. The customized webpages may include variations of layout, colors, themes, information, product recommendations, and advertisements. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized electronic content may be the body of an email sent to users. The users may view the emails using an email program running on the user computers 27. Thus, it will be appreciated that the personalized electronic content may be any electronic content that may be viewed on the user computers 27 by users and is not limited to just webpages and emails. For example, the personalized electronic content may be displayed to users on the remote computers 27 on a webpage, as viewed, for example, on a display 26 of one or more remote user computers 27, through the communication network 30, e.g., Internet. In an embodiment, the personalized content may include social media content, or any other content generated for display to a user, including but not limited to, product recommendations and adverstisements of all sorts.
Referring now to
In addition, the template 100 may further include empty frames 108A-108D. The frames 108A-108D may be able to display personalized advertising content as determined by the server 21. In an embodiment, the frames 108A-108D are populated by the server 21 with personalized electronic content using the present invention. The content in the frames 108A-108D may be interactive such that when selected by a user, the content in the frames 108A-108D directs a user to product listings or product category pages. Thus, it will be appreciated that the personalized content displayed in the frames 108A-108D may be varied from user to user to provide a personalized webpage from the template 100. In an embodiment, the template 100 may be for a homepage of an e-commerce website. It will be noted that the larger the frame, the more weight is given to the frame. For example, frame 108A is considered to have more weight than frames 108B and 108C since it is larger.
Referring now to
In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content generated by the server 21 may be targeted advertisements placed on a third-party website. For example, the personalized content may be a banner ad or other type of advertisement displayed on a news website. The banner ad may include an interactive link to an e-commerce website. Thus, it will be appreciated that personalized content may include product advertisements, targeted advertisements and product recommendations. In addition, personalized content may include customized search results and webpage layouts. In an embodiment, the personalized content may comprise at least one of targeted advertisements, product recommendations, banner advertisements, special promotions, webpages, invitations, emails, search results and sorted product lists. The manner of generating personalized electronic content will now be described below.
To generate personalized content, the electronic content generation server 21 tracks, stores, and maintains user interaction information under a master ID in a database. The master ID may be a numeric or alphanumeric identifier. In an embodiment, the master ID is a pre-existing master ID, and may comprise an online user identifier. In an illustrative embodiment, the user interaction information may include user interactions with websites, including e-commerce websites and any other type of websites. In an embodiment, the user interaction information may be tracked and recorded by another server, including a third-party tracking server as known to those of ordinary skill. The third-party tracking server may make the user interaction information available to the server 21. The user interaction information may include a wide range of data that may be utilized to assist in identifying and tracking a user or specific user computers 27 online, including user online identifiers.
In an illustrative embodiment, the user online identifiers may include user account information provided while creating a user account with a website. For example, users may be required to establish user accounts in order to conduct e-commerce with an e-commerce website. As known to those having ordinary skill, to establish a user account, a user may be required to complete a registration process that requires that the user provide a unique login ID and password. In addition, a user may be required to provide his or her first and last name, an email address, home address and a shipping address. The user may also be required to provide payment information, including a credit card number, billing name, and a billing address.
In an illustrative embodiment, the user online identifiers may include the tracking cookies of the user computers 27 through which a user accesses a user account on a website. For example, if a user is found to have accessed the same user account on an e-commerce website from multiple user computers 27, the server 21 tracks and records the tracking cookies of each of user computers 27 that accessed the same user account under the same master ID in the database. It will be appreciated a tracking cookie is a form of a unique tracking identifier. It will be further appreciated that as used herein, the term “unique tracking identifier” refers to tracking cookies, i.e., small pieces of data sent from a website and stored in a user's web browser, and data similar to tracking cookies, including unique identifiers used in a similar manner to tracking cookies to identify electronic devices.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 tracks and records multiple email addresses utilized to login to the same user account and associates those email addresses under the same master ID in the database. For example, a user may utilize both a work and a personal email address to access the same user account on a website. (This may occur when a user clicks on an interactive link provided in a solicited or unsolicited email sent to the user's email addresses). Both the work and personal email addresses would be stored under the same master ID in the database by the server 21.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may run an automated procedure to determine if a user can be matched to other user accounts registered with other websites. For example, a user may have multiple user accounts with multiple websites. To accomplish this task, the server 21 may attempt to match user information associated with a first user account known to be associated with a targeted user with the user information associated with a second user account. For example, the server 21 may attempt to match a user's name, physical address, or email address associated with a first user account with a user's name, physical address, or email address of a second user account. In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may compare the last name and the first few letters of the first name to determine if a match exists. If the server 21 matches the user information of the first user account with the user information of the second user account, then the second user account may be associated to the master ID in the database in conjunction with the first user account.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may run an automated procedure to determine if multiple email addresses are associated with the same physical address or household. To accomplish this task, the server 21 may attempt to match user information associated with a first email address known to be associated with a targeted user with user information associated with a second email account. In an illustrative embodiment, the user information may be a physical address associated with the email addresses. For example, if two email addresses are associated with the same physical address, a match has been found. If a match is found, the second email address may be associated with the master ID in the database along with the first email address.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may track and record the different IP addresses through which a user account on a website is accessed. The server 21 may also track and record the IP addresses of the user computers 27 that access a website. The server 21 may also track and record the IP addresses of emails through which a website is accessed. These IP addresses are associated with the same master ID in the database by the server 21.
Referring now to
When a user established a user account with the website through a registration process, this user account may become the base user account 205. During the registration process, the user may provide personal information, including login ID, password, first name, last name, and physical address.
In an illustrative embodiment, when a user provides an email address in association with creating the user account on the website, this email address becomes the base email address 204 associated with the master ID table 200 as shown in
As the server 21 tracks and records user interactions with a website, a user may login to his or her account from one or more of the other ones of the user computers 27. The website may transmit and store tracking cookies on the other ones of the user computers 27. The server 21 also stores these tracking cookies 206 of the other ones of the user computers 27 in the master ID table 200. In addition, if a user logs into his or her user account through email accounts that are not the base email account 204, the server 21 also stores these email addresses 208 in the master ID table 200.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may attempt to match other user accounts to the user account associated with the base user account 205. This may be done by matching personal information associated with each user account, such as name and physical address. If the server 21 matches other user accounts to the base user account 205, then those accounts are listed in the table 200 under matched user accounts 210. It will be appreciated that the matched user accounts 210 may be accounts on the same website as the base user account 205 or on other third-party websites.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may attempt to match other email addresses to the physical address associated with the base email address 204 through address matching. For example, if other email addresses are found to have the same physical address as that of the physical address associated with the base email address 204, then these other email addresses are stored in the table 200 as matched email addresses 212.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may also track and record the IP addresses for: (i) the user computer 27 associated with the base tracking cookie 202; (ii) the user computers 27 through which the user accesses his or her email; (iii) the user computers 27 through which the user logins to his or her account; and (4) any other user computer 27 that can be matched or linked to the user. These IP addresses are stored in the table 200 as IP address 214.
As can be observed, the user online identifiers in the master ID table 200 are logically divided into Levels I-IV. It will be appreciated that the logical division of the table 200 into Levels I-IV is for discussion purposes only and to assist in the disclosure of the present invention. That is, the table 200 may not actually be divided or arranged into separate levels when stored in a database. The division of the table 200 into Levels I-IV should therefore not be considered limiting on the scope of the present disclosure.
As can further be observed from
For example, personalizing electronic content solely based on matched IP addresses 214 may result in a user being presented with irrelevant and even offensive content because of the multiple numbers of other users that may be using the IP addresses 214. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the personalization of electronic content based on the data in Levels IV should be avoided. In fact, personalizing electronic content based on the data in Levels II-IV can be worthwhile if conducted pursuant to pre-defined usage parameters as will be discussed below.
Prior to proceeding, it is important to note that the manner in which the user online identifiers in table 200 may be utilized to generate personalized content in an embodiment of the present disclosure. In general, websites, or third-party tracking entities, track online user behavior to collect information about a user to predict product or product categories in which the user may be most interested. This generally involves the collection and analysis of click stream data and other online user behavior to create a score or profile that, as accurately as possible, identifies the user as a person who may be interested in certain products or content.
In an illustrative embodiment, collection of user online behavior data involves the tagging of websites to track and capture click stream data as the user browses a website. Data may be collected and stored in a database or data warehouse and are subjected to data mining algorithms to uncover patterns in browser behavior. The results of the data mining procedure are used to create the behavioral profile or score which may then be used to serve personalized content, including advertisements and product recommendations, matched to the predicted user behavior.
In an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure, user data, including historical online behavior, demographic information, purchase history, and user preferences, are not stored under a user's actual name, but may be instead stored by the server 21 under user online identifiers, including tracking cookies, user accounts, email addresses, and IP addresses as shown in
It will be appreciated that the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214 may each have its own tracked and captured user behavioral data, and user demographic data, stored in a database that may be utilized to generate personalized content, including targeted advertisements. In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 tracks and captures user online behavior for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214. In an illustrative embodiment, one or more third-party servers track and capture user online behavior and demographic data for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214.
In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 is operable to generate personalized electronic content, such as targeted advertisements, based on the tracked and captured user online behavior and demographic data for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214. In an illustrative embodiment, one or more third-party servers are operable to generate and provide to the server 21 personalized electronic content, such as targeted advertisements, based on the tracked and captured user online behavior and user demographic information for each of the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214.
It will be appreciated that using the online user behavior and demographic data associated with the base tracking cookie 202, base email address 204, base user account 205, tracking cookies 206, email addresses 208, matched user accounts 210, matched email addresses 212, and IP addresses 214 creates a more robust data set for personalization of electronically generated content.
In an illustrative embodiment, the present invention further contemplates applying content usage parameters to the electronically generated content to account for variations in the user ID confidence level. In particular, where the user ID confidence level is high, then the higher the degree of personalization of the personalized content. Where the user ID confidence level is low, the degree of personalization of the personalized content is reduced.
In this regard, the present invention takes into account that for some user online identifiers in
Referring now to
As can be observed, for each of the Levels I-IV, there is provided in the table 300 the following rows: Recommended Messaging, Template, Adult Categories, Personal Sensitive, Personal Non-Sensitive, and Lowest Taxonomy Level. Each of these will now be explained.
Recommended Messaging refers to the prominence of the electronically generated content. That is, Recommended Messaging determines whether the electronically generated content is explicit or implicit in its targeting of a user. Explicit content makes clear that the user is being targeted, while implicit advertising does not make targeting clear. For example, where a user's previous online behavior predicts that the user may be interested in a diamond wedding ring previously viewed in a product listing, explicit content may include an image of the actual ring previously viewed by the user along with a statement inviting the user by name to purchase the ring. Implicit content, on the other hand, may simply include a general advertisement for wedding rings. Thus, explicit content is more personalized than implicit content.
The Template row in
In an illustrative embodiment, the content usage parameters may include product filters. The Adult Categories row in
It will be appreciated that some of the products or categories in a product taxonomy of an e-commerce website may be identified as adult, sensitive, or non-sensitive in a database. In an illustrative embodiment, this identification may be done manually by an operator of the server 21. In an illustrative embodiment, the server 21 may automate the identification.
Lowest Taxonomy Level refers to the lowest level of a product taxonomy tree that will be presented to a user for the Levels I-IV. Product level refers to the lowest node in a product taxonomy tree and may be an actual product offered for sale. Product level +1 refers to the next level just above the product level. Product level +2 refers to second level above the product level. Product level +3 refers to third level above the product level. In this regard, product level +1, product level +2, and product level +3, are subcategories in a product taxonomy tree while product level may be an actual product. (The arrow labeled “Product Taxonomy Level” in
From
Referring now to
At step 402, a plurality of user online identifiers are associated in a database under a master ID. The master ID may be a numeric or alphanumeric identifier. The user online identifiers may include tracking cookies, email addresses, user accounts, IP addresses, or any other user online identifier utilized to track and monitor user behavior while online. The tracking cookies may include unique identifying data stored in the memory of user computers as known to those of ordinary skill. The tracking cookies may include tracking cookies from multiple user computers used to login to the same user account on a website.
The email addresses may include an email address provided by a user in association with a subscription, account creation, or lead generation. The email addresses may also include multiple email addresses linked to a single user account through login. For example, the email addresses may include a home and work email address for a user that are utilized to login to the same user account on a website.
The user accounts may include user accounts matched to a known user account for a user. The user accounts may be matched by comparing personal identifying information such as last name, first name, and a physical or mailing address. A user account that has the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address is likely to be the same user of another user account that has the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address.
Likewise, the email accounts may include email accounts matched by a physical or mailing address to a known address for a user. Again, an email account that has associated therewith the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address is likely to be the same user of another email account that has the same last name, first name, and/or physical or mailing address. The IP addresses may include IP addresses that are used by the user computers to access a user account on a website.
It will be appreciated that the user online identifiers associated with the master ID may each have stored in a database associated tracked online behavior and/or demographic information that may be utilized to generate personalized content based upon predicted behavior.
At step 404, a set of content usage parameters is defined or assigned for each of the user online identifiers. Each set may contain a recommended messaging type, i.e., explicit or implicit. Each set may further include a template variant. Each set may further include product filters that exclude certain categories of products or products in a product taxonomy tree and also identifies the lowest level in the product taxonomy tree that may be presented for the associated user online identifier.
At step 406, a targeted user online identifier for a user is provided, identified, or selected. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is obtained during a user's visit to a website. In association with the visit, the targeted user online identifier for the user is obtained. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier may be a tracking cookie stored on a user computer. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is an email account. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is a user account. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user online identifier is an IP address. Multiple targeted user online identifiers may be obtained at this step. For example, the target user online identifiers may include a tracking cookie, a user account, and an IP address. In an illustrative embodiment, the user online identifier is a targeted email address obtained from a list of targeted users in conjunction with an email marketing campaign.
At step 408, the target user online identifier(s) obtained at step 406 are compared to a plurality of user online identifiers stored in the database under master IDs. If a match is found, the corresponding master ID is identified, selected, and stored.
At step 410, preliminary electronic content is generated using the user online behavior for one or more of the user online identifiers associated with the selected master ID. The preliminary electronic content may identify one or more entries in a product taxonomy tree that are predicted to be of interest to the user.
At step 412, the set of content usage parameters corresponding to the targeted user online identifier(s) obtained at step 406 is applied to the preliminary electronic content generated at step 410 to generate personalized content.
At step 414, the personalized content generated at step 412 is displayed on a display of the user's computer. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be transmitted over a network and displayed in a web browser on the user computer. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be used to populate a template. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be a targeted advertisement for a product or a service. In an illustrative embodiment, the personalized content may be a banner add displayed on a third-party website. In an illustrative embodiment, the generated personalized content may be in a body of an email. The personalized content may be interactive such that a user can click through to an e-commerce website as known to those of ordinary skill. It will be appreciated the personalized content may include content for multiple targeted user online identifiers. In this regard, multiple sets of content usage parameters may be used to generate the personalized content.
At step 416, the user may complete an e-commerce transaction for a product or server advertised in the personalized content on an e-commerce website.
A user requests a homepage of an e-commerce website from a server through a web browser running on a user computer as known to those of ordinary skill. Prior to generating the homepage, the server requests a tracking cookie previously stored on the user computer. Upon receiving the tracking cookie, the server compares the targeted tracking cookie to a database of tracking cookies. Upon finding a match to the tracking cookie of the user computer in the database, the server identifies, selects, and stores a master ID associated with the tracking cookie found in the database. Using the master ID, the server is able to identify other user online identifiers associated with the master ID.
Using one or more of the user online identifiers associated with the master ID, the server is able to generate preliminary electronic content based on user online behavior that was previously tracked and stored. Then, the server applies to the preliminary electronic content the appropriate sets of content usage parameters to define the final personalized content. The personalized content is then utilized to populate a homepage template, which is served to the user computer and displayed in a web browser as the homepage. The personalized content may comprise targeted advertisements or product recommendations. (End of example.)
Those having ordinary skill in the relevant art will appreciate the advantages provide by the features of the present disclosure. For example, it is a feature of the present disclosure to provide an enhanced user identification system and method for use in e-commerce. Another feature of the present disclosure is to provide an enhanced user identification system and method for personalizing electronically generated content used for webpages, emails, and other electronic documents. It is a further feature of the present disclosure, in accordance with one aspect thereof, to provide a system for personalizing electronic content to increase the probability of a sale in an e-commerce environment.
In the foregoing Detailed Description, various features of the present disclosure are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description of the Disclosure by this reference, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the present disclosure.
It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present disclosure. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, and the appended claims, are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present disclosure has been shown in the drawings and described above with particularity and detail, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808987 | Takeda et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4854516 | Yamada | Aug 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
RE33316 | Katsuta et al. | Aug 1990 | E |
5027110 | Chang et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5053956 | Donald et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5063507 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5205200 | Wright | Apr 1993 | A |
5243515 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280422 | Moe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301350 | Rogan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347632 | Filepp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394324 | Clearwater | Feb 1995 | A |
5407433 | Loomas | Apr 1995 | A |
5411483 | Loomas et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5493677 | Balogh et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5557728 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5579471 | Barber et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5598557 | Doner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5664111 | Nahan et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5706457 | Dwyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721908 | Lagarde et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722418 | Bro | Mar 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737599 | Rowe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760917 | Sheridan | Jun 1998 | A |
5761496 | Hattori | Jun 1998 | A |
5761655 | Hoffman | Jun 1998 | A |
5761662 | Dasan | Jun 1998 | A |
5771291 | Newton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771380 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778367 | Wesinger, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794216 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5796395 | de Hond | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803500 | Mossberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5818914 | Fujisaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5870754 | Dimitrova et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873069 | Reuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873080 | Coden et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890175 | Wong et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5970547 | Foladare et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913215 | Rubinstein et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922074 | Richard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924072 | Havens | Jul 1999 | A |
5926794 | Fethe | Jul 1999 | A |
5948040 | DeLorme et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974412 | Hazlehurst et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987446 | Corey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991739 | Cupps et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999915 | Nahan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012053 | Pant et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029141 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035288 | Solomon | Mar 2000 | A |
6035402 | Vaeth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044363 | Mori et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045447 | Yoshizawa et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047264 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049797 | Guha et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055518 | Franklin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058379 | Odom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058417 | Hess et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058428 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061448 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065041 | Lum et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070125 | Murphy et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073117 | Oyanagi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078914 | Redfern | Jun 2000 | A |
6085176 | Woolston | Jul 2000 | A |
6104815 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119137 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128649 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141010 | Hoyle | Oct 2000 | A |
6167382 | Sparks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178408 | Copple et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185558 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192407 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199077 | Inala et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202061 | Khosla et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226412 | Schwab | May 2001 | B1 |
6243691 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269238 | Iggulden | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271840 | Finseth et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275820 | Navin-Chandra et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275829 | Angiulo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6356879 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6356905 | Gershman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356908 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366899 | Kernz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370527 | Singhai | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373933 | Sarkki et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374260 | Hoffert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381410 | Amidhozour et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415320 | Hess et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434556 | Levin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456307 | Bates et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460020 | Pool et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466917 | Goyal et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484149 | Jammes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489968 | Ortega et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522955 | Colborn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523037 | Monahan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6601061 | Holt et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604107 | Wang | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625764 | Dawson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643696 | Davis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661431 | Stuart et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665838 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6701310 | Sugiura et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718536 | Dupaquis | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725268 | Jackel et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728704 | Mao et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732161 | Hess et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732162 | Wood et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6856963 | Hurwitz | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6889054 | Himmel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7043450 | Velez et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7069242 | Sheth et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7076453 | Jammes et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076504 | Handel et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080030 | Elgen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7100111 | McElfresh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117207 | Kerschberg et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127416 | Tenorio | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7165091 | Lunenfeld | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167910 | Farnham et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216115 | Walters et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7254547 | Beck et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7318037 | Solari | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324966 | Scheer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7340249 | Moran et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349668 | Ilan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353188 | Yim et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366755 | Cuomo et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7379890 | Myr et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380217 | Gvelesiani | May 2008 | B2 |
7383320 | Silberstein et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7401025 | Lokitz | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7447646 | Agarwal et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454464 | Puthenkulam et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457730 | Degnan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7493521 | Li et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7496527 | Silverstein et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496582 | Farnham et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7516094 | Perkowski | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539696 | Greener et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7546625 | Kamangar | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7552067 | Nephew et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565615 | Ebert | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7606743 | Orzell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610212 | Klett et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7653573 | Hayes, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7834883 | Adams | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7912748 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7983950 | DeVita | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8112303 | Eglen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140989 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8204799 | Murray et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8260852 | Cselle | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8494912 | Fraser et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8577740 | Murray et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8693494 | Fiatal | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8793650 | Hilerio et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9448692 | Milerau et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
20010034667 | Petersen | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034668 | Whitworth | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044751 | Pugliese et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047290 | Petras et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047308 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002513 | Chiasson | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007356 | Rice et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013721 | Capel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022995 | Miller et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023059 | Bari et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026390 | Ulenas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029187 | Meehan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038312 | Donner et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040352 | McCormick | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042738 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020099578 | Eicher et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099579 | Scelzo et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099602 | Moskowitz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107718 | Morrill et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120537 | Morea et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124100 | Adams | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129282 | Hopkins | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147625 | Kolke | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156802 | Takayama et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161648 | Mason et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188777 | Kraft et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198784 | Shaak et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004855 | Dutta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005046 | Kavanagh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009362 | Cifani et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009392 | Perkowski | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014400 | Siegel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028605 | Millett et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032409 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035138 | Schilling | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036914 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040970 | Miller | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041008 | Grey et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046149 | Wong | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069740 | Zeidman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069790 | Kane | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069825 | Burk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088467 | Culver | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088511 | Karboulonis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093331 | Childs et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097352 | Gutta et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110100 | Wirth, Jr. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119492 | Timmins et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131095 | Kumhyr et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139969 | Scroggie et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140121 | Adams | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158792 | Perkowski | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163340 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167213 | Jammes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187745 | Hobday et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200156 | Roseman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204449 | Kotas et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217002 | Enborg | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006509 | Mannik et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015416 | Foster et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029567 | Timmins et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041836 | Zaner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044563 | Stein | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055017 | Delpuch et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073476 | Donahue et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078388 | Melman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107136 | Nemirofsky et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117242 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122083 | Lippert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122681 | Ruvolo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122735 | Meshkin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122855 | Ruvolo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128183 | Challey et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128320 | Grove et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172323 | Stamm | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172379 | Mott et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174979 | Hutton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186766 | Fellenstein et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199496 | Liu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204991 | Monahan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240642 | Crandell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249727 | Cook, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267717 | Slackman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010925 | Khawand et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021666 | Dinnage et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038733 | Foster et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044254 | Smith | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055306 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060664 | Rogers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097204 | Horowitz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114229 | Ackley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120311 | Thrall | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131837 | Sanctis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144064 | Calabria et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050193333 | Ebert | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197846 | Pezaris et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197950 | Moya et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198031 | Pezaris et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202390 | Allen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203888 | Woolsey et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216300 | Appelman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262067 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273378 | MacDonald-Korth et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009994 | Hogg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010105 | Sarukkai et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031240 | Eyal et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041638 | Whittaker et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058048 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069623 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085251 | Greene | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060173817 | Chowdhury et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206479 | Mason | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235752 | Kavanagh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259360 | Flinn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271671 | Hansen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005424 | Arauz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027760 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073641 | Perry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077025 | Mino | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078726 | MacDonald Korth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083437 | Hamor | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094597 | Rostom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100803 | Cava | May 2007 | A1 |
20070160345 | Sakai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162379 | Skinner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192168 | Van Luchene | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192181 | Asdourian | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206606 | Coleman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214048 | Chan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226679 | Jayamohan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233565 | Herzog et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239534 | Liu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245013 | Saraswathy et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260520 | Jha et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282666 | Afeyan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299743 | Staib | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080052152 | Yufik | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082394 | Floyd et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080120342 | Reed et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126205 | Evans et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126476 | Nicholas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133305 | Yates et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140765 | Kelaita et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162574 | Gilbert | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201218 | Broder et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215456 | West et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080288338 | Wiseman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294536 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300909 | Rikhtverchik et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301009 | Plaster et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006190 | Lucash et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030755 | Altberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030775 | Vieri | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090106080 | Carrier et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106127 | Purdy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110181 | Koenig et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119167 | Kendall et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157537 | Miller | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164323 | Byrne | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182589 | Kendall et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204848 | Kube et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222348 | Ransom et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240582 | Sheldon-Neal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090276284 | Yost | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293019 | Raffel et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100042684 | Broms et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076816 | Phillips | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076851 | Jewell et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094673 | Lobo et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145831 | Esfandiari et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100228617 | Ransom et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110060621 | Weller et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110103699 | Ke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153383 | Bhattacharjya et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173076 | Eggleston et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196802 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225050 | Varghese | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231226 | Golden | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231383 | Smyth et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271204 | Jones et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276513 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120005187 | Chavanne | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030067 | Pothukuchi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120084135 | Nissan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120158715 | Mahoul et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166299 | Heinstein et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120231424 | Calman et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130073392 | Allen | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080200 | Connolly et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080426 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085893 | Bhardwaj et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130144870 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130151388 | Falkenborg | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130254059 | Teo | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140032544 | Mathieu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140114680 | Mills et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140180758 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140200959 | Sarb | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140289005 | Laing | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140337090 | Tavares | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2253543 | Oct 1997 | CA |
2347812 | May 2000 | CA |
0636993 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0807891 | May 2000 | EP |
1241603 | Mar 2001 | EP |
2397400 | Jul 2004 | GB |
2424098 | Sep 2006 | GB |
2001283083 | Oct 2001 | JP |
9717663 | May 1997 | WO |
9832289 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9847082 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9849641 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9959283 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0025218 | May 2000 | WO |
0109803 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0182135 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2001097099 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2002037234 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2003094080 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2012093410 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO2015116038 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gallagher et al. A framework for targeting banner advertising on the internet. IEEE, pp. 265-274. (Year: 1997). |
“Mediappraise: Mediappraise Receives National Award for Web-Based Technology That Enables Companies to Solve Thorny HR Problem,” Dec. 14, 1998. |
Medvinsky et al., “Electronic Currency for the Internet,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
metails.com, www.metails.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter and p. 33. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter, back matter, and pp. 479, 486. |
Neches, “FAST—A Research Project in Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 4 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Neo, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Dec. 1992, pp. 278-288, vol. 1, No. 5. |
O'Mahony, “An X.500-based Product Catalogue,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
“ONSALE: ONSALE Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online: Unique Internet retail services debuts with week-long charity auction for The Computer Museum in Boston,” May 24, 1995, printed from www.dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?dwcommand,DWEBPRINT%20810-489267. |
“ONSALE joins fray as online shopping picks up speed: Internet Booms,” Computer Reseller News, Jun. 5, 1995. |
Palm, Inc. Palm™ Web Pro Handbook, copyright 2002-2003. |
Post et al., “Application of Auctions as a Pricing Mechanism for the Interchange of Electric Power,” IEEE Transactions of Power Systems, Aug. 1995, pp. 1580-1584, vol. 10, No. 3. |
Preist et al., “Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction,” International Conference on Information and Computation, Proceedings of the first international conference on information and computation economies, Oct. 25-28, 1998, Charleston, United States, pp. 11-18. |
Qualcomm, “Brew Developer Support,” printed from web.archive.org/web/20020209194207/http:/www.qualcomm.com/brew/developer/support/kb/52.html on Aug. 30, 2007. |
RCR Wireless News, “Lockheed Martin to use 2Roam's technology for wireless platform,” RCR Wireless News, Sep. 10, 2001. |
Reck, “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System,” J. Systems Software, 1993, pp. 245-252, vol. 21. |
Reck, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 17-23, vol. 7, No. 4. |
repcheck.com, www.repcheck.com homepage, printed from web.archive.org/web/20020330183132/http://repcheck.com on Sep. 5, 2009. |
Resnick et al., “Reputation Systems,” Communications of the ACM, Dec. 2000, pp. 45-48, vol. 43, No. 12. |
Rockoff et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 1995, pp. 10-16, vol. 5, No. 4. |
Rose, “Vendors strive to undo Adobe lock-hold,” Computer Reseller News, Feb. 5, 1996, n 66669, p. 71(7). |
Rysavy, “Mobile-commerce ASPs do the legwork,” Network Computing, Jan. 22, 2001, p. 71, 6 pgs., vol. 12, No. 2. |
Saunders, “AdFlight to Offer WAP Ads,” Oct. 17, 2000, printed from clickz.com/487531/print. |
Schmid, “Electronic Markets,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Schwankert, “Matsushita Taps 2Roam for Wireless Solutions,” www.internetnews.com/bus-news.article.php/674811, Feb. 2, 2001. |
Şen, “Inventory and Pricing Models for Perishable Products,” Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation—University of Southern California, Aug. 2000. |
Siegmann, “Nowhere to go but up,” PC Week, Oct. 23, 1995, 3 pages, vol. 12, No. 42. |
Telephony Staff, “Air-ASP,” Telephone Online, Oct. 2, 2000, 3 pages. |
Teo, “Organizational Factors of Success in Using EDIS: A Survey of Tradenet Participants,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Tjostheim et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web,” printed from www.nr.no/gem/elcom/puplikasjoner/enter98e.html on Jun. 10, 1999, 10 pages. |
Turban, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 5 pages, vol. 7, No. 4. |
ubid.com, “How do I Update my Address, Phone, Credit Card, Password, etc.?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208113903/www.ubid.com/help/topic13asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
ubid.com, “How do I track my shipment?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010331032659/www.ubid.com/help/topic27.asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
ubid.com, “Can I track all of my bids from My Page?” pritned from web.archive.org/web/20010208114049/www.ubid.com/help/topic14.asp on Aug. 30, 2007. |
Van Heck et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 6 pages, vol. 7, No. 4. |
Verizon Wireless, “Verizon Wireless Customers Get It NowSM; Get Games, Get Pix, Get Ring Tones and Get Going in Full Color,” press release to PRNEWSWIRE, Sep. 23, 2002. |
Warbelow et al., “AUCNET: TV Auction Network System,” Harvard Business School 9-190-001, Jul. 19, 1989, Rev. Apr. 12, 1996, pp. 1-15. |
Weber, “How Financial Markets are Going On-line,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Wireless Internet, “DailyShopper Selects 2Roam to Enable Mobile Customers to Retrieve Nearby Sales and Promotions Information,” Wireless Internet, Apr. 2001. |
Wireless Week, “Verizon Wireless Gets Going on BREW Agenda,” Wireless Week, Sep. 23, 2002. |
xchanger.net, webpage printed from www.auctiva.com/showcases/as_4sale.asp?uid=exchanger, undated but at least as early as Oct. 12, 2000. |
Yu et al., “Distributed Reputation Management for Electronic Commerce,” Computational Intelligence, 2002, pp. 535-549, vol. 18, No. 4. |
Zetmeir, Auction Incentive Marketing, print of all pages of website found at home.earthlink.net/˜bidpointz/ made Oct. 8, 2004. |
Zimmermann, “Integration of Financial Services: The TeleCounter,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
2ROAM, Inc., multiple archived pages of www.2roam.com retrieved via Internet Archive Wayback Machine on Jun. 10, 2008. |
Alt et al., “Bibliography on Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 5 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Alt et al., “Computer Integrated Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Anonymous, Image manipulation (image-editing software and image-manipulation systems)(Seybold Special Report, Part II), Seybold Report on Publishing Systems, May 15, 1995, pS35(9), vol. 24, No. 18. |
auctionwatch.com, multiple pages—including search results for “expedition,” printed Apr. 21, 2011. |
auctiva.com, multiple pages, undated but website copyright date is “1999-2000.” |
Berger et al., “Random Multiple-Access Communication and Group Testing,” IEEE, 1984. |
Braganza, “IS Research at Cranfield—A Look at the Future,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Brecht et al., “The IM 2000 Research Programme,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Business Wire business/technology editors, “Sellers Flock to OutletZoo.com as New Automatic Price Drop Method Moves Excess Inventory Online,” Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Expands in Real Estate Market with Adoption of Rimfire on REALTOR.com,” Business Wire, Nov. 8, 1999. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Shows Strong Revenue Growth in Internet Imaging Business,” Business Wire, Nov. 10, 1999. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Partners with Pumatech to Delivery Wireless Alerts,” Business Wire, Dec. 18, 2000. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Takes eHow's How-to Solutions Wireless: With 2Roam, the Web's One-Stop Source for Getting Things Done is on More Wireless Devices, with Ability to Purchase Its Products from Anywhere,” Business Wire, Oct. 2, 2000. |
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Drives Hertz to the Wireless Web; Number One Car Rental Company to Provide Customers Wireless Access from Any Device,” Business Wire, Aug. 7, 2001. |
buy.com, www.buy.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004. |
Chen et al., “Detecting Web Page Structure for Adaptive Viewing on Small Form Factor Devices,” ACM, May 20-24, 2003. |
Clarke, “Research Programme in Supra-organizational Systems,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
friendster.com, homepage and “more info” pages, printed Apr. 29, 2004. |
Google News archive search for “2Roam marketing” performed over the date range 2000-2003. |
Grabowski et al., “Mobile-enabled grid middleware and/or grid gateways,” GridLab—A Grid Application Toolkit and Testbed, Work Package 12—Access for Mobile Users, Jun. 3, 2003. |
Graham, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Jul. 1998, 4 pages, vol. 8, No. 2. |
Gunthorpe et al., “Portfolio Composition and the Investment Horizon,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 51-56. |
Halperin, “Toward a Process Handbook for Organizational Coordination Processes,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Hess et al., “Computerized Loan Origination Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, pp. 251-275. |
IBM, “Anonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1996, pp. 363-366, vol. 39, No. 3. |
IBM, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1995, pp. 83-84, vol. 38, No. 1. |
ICRCROSSING, “ICRCROSSING Search Synergy: Natural & Paid Search Symbiosis,” Mar. 2007. |
IEEE 100—The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms, Seventh Edition, 2000. Entire book cited; table of contents, source list, and terms beginning with A included. ISBN 0-7381-2601-2. |
Ives et al., “Editor's Comments—MISQ Central: Creating a New Intellectual Infrastructure,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, p. xxxv. |
Klein, “Information Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, pp. 11-12, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Klein, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 4 pages, vol. 7, No. 4. |
Kubicek, “The Organization Gap,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Kuula, “Telematic Services in Finland,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Lalonde, “The EDI World Institute: An International Approach,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Lee et al., “Intelligent Electronic Trading for Commodity Exchanges,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Lee, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions,” Electronic Market—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 24-28, vol. 7, No. 4. |
LIVE365 press release, “Live365 to Offer Opt-In Advertising on Its Website,” Oct. 15, 2004. |
London Business School, “Overture and Google: Internet Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising Options,” Mar. 2003. |
M2 Presswire, “Palm, Inc.: Palm unveils new web browser optimised for handhelds; HTML browser offers high-speed web-browsing option,” Mar. 13, 2002. |
Mansell et al., “Electronic Trading Networks: The Route to Competitive Advantage?” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3. |
Mardesich, “Onsale takes auction gavel electronic,” Computer Reseller News, Jul. 8, 1996, pp. 2, 32. |
Marteau, “Shop with One Click, Anywhere, Anytime,” Information Management and Consulting, 2000, pp. 44-46, vol. 15, No. 4. |
Massimb et al., “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 39-49. |
McGinity, “Build Your Weapon,” PC Magazine, Apr. 24, 2011, printed from www.pcmag.com/print_article2?0,1217,a%253D3955,00.asp. |
Meade, “Visual 360: a performance appraisal system that's ‘fun,’” HR Magazine, 44, 7, 118(3), Jul. 1999. |
Ball et al., “Supply chain infrastructures: system integration and information sharing,” ACM SIGMOD Record, 2002, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 61-66. |
Joshi, “Information visibility and its effect on supply chain dynamics,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000 (fig. 4.5; p. 45). |
Clemons et al., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities markets,” Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information systems, New York, New York, United States, pp. 53-64, 1991. |
Google News archive search for “2Roam SMS” performed over the date range 2000-2008. |
Lee et al., “Electronic Brokerage and Electronic Auction: The Impact of IT on Market Structures,” Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1996, pp. 397-406. |
Malone et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,” Communications of the ACM, Jun. 1987, pp. 484-497, vol. 30, No. 6. |
Schaffer, Neil, The Top 20 Twitter clients—HootSuite, TweetDeck and More, Jan. 31, 2012, https://maximizesocialbusinss.com/top-20-twitter-clients-2012-9175/ (Year: 2012). |
ZWASS, “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, pp. 3-23, vol. 1, No. 1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150051979 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |