The present invention is directed to a system and method of providing composite real-time dynamic imagery of a medical procedure site using multiple modalities. One or more of the modalities may provide two-dimensional or three-dimensional imagery.
It is well established that minimally-invasive surgery (MIS) techniques offer significant health benefits over their analogous laparotomic (or “open”) counterparts. Among these benefits are reduced trauma, rapid recovery time, and shortened hospital stays, resulting in greatly reduced care needs and costs. However, because of limited visibility to certain internal organs, some surgical procedures are at present difficult to perform using MIS. With conventional technology, a surgeon operates through small incisions using special instruments while viewing internal anatomy and the operating field through a two-dimensional monitor. Operating below while seeing a separate image above can give rise to a number of problems. These include the issue of parallax, a spatial coordination problem, and a lack of depth perception. Thus, the surgeon bears a higher cognitive load when employing MIS techniques than with conventional open surgery because the surgeon has to work with a less natural hand-Instrument-image coordination.
These problems may be exacerbated when the surgeon wishes to employ other modalities to view the procedure. A modality may be any method and/or technique for visually representing a scene. Such modalities, such as intraoperative iaparoscopic ultrasound, would benefit the procedure by providing complementary information regarding the anatomy of the surgical site, and, in some cases, allowing the surgeon to see inside of an organ before making an incision or performing any other treatment and/or procedure. But employing more than one modality is often prohibitively difficult to use. This is particularly the case when the modalities are video streams displayed separately on separate monitors. Even if the different modalities are presented in a picture-in-picture or side-by-side arrangement on the same monitor, it would not be obvious to the surgeon, or any other viewer, how the anatomical features in each video stream correspond. This is so because, the spatial relationship between the areas of interest at the surgical site, for example, surface, tissue, organs, and/or other objects imaged by the different modalities, are not aligned to the same view perspectives. As such, the same areas of interest may be positioned and oriented differently between the different modalities. This is a particular problem for modalities like ultrasound, wherein anatomical features do not obviously correspond to the same feature in optical (or white-light) video.
The problems may be further exacerbated in that the surgical site is not static but dynamic, continually changing during the surgery. For example, in laparoscopic surgery, the organs in the abdomen continually move and reshape as the surgeon explores, cuts, stitches, removes and otherwise manipulates organs and tissues inside the body cavity. Even the amount of gas inside the body cavity (used to make space for the surgical instruments) changes during the surgery, and this affects the shape or position of everything within the surgical site. Therefore, if the views from the modalities are not continuous and immediate, they may not accurately and effectively depict the current state and/or conditions of the surgical site.
While there is current medical imaging technology that superimposes a video stream using one modality on an image dataset from another modality, the image dataset is static and, therefore, not continuous or immediate. As such, the image dataset, must be periodically updated based on the position of the subject, for example the patient, and/or anatomical or other features and/or landmarks. Periodically updating and/or modifying the image dataset may introduce undue latency in the system, which may be unacceptable from a medical procedure standpoint. The undue latency may cause the image being viewed on the display by the surgeon to be continually obsolete. Additionally, relying on the positions of the subject, and/or anatomical or other features and/or landmarks to update and/or modify the image being viewed, may cause the images from the different modalities to not only be obsolete but, also, non-synchronous when viewed.
Accordingly, there currently is no medical imaging technology directed to providing composite real-time dynamic imagery from multiple modalities using two or more video streams, wherein each video stream from each modality may provide a real-time view of the medical procedure site to provide a continuous and immediate view of the current state and condition of the medical procedure site. Also, there currently is no medical imaging technology directed to providing composite imagery from multiple modalities using two or more video streams, wherein each video stream may be dynamic in that each may be synchronized to the other, and not separately to the position of the subject, and/or anatomical or other features and/or landmarks. As such, there is currently no medical imaging technology that provides composite real-lime, dynamic imagery of the medical procedure site from multiple modalities.
Therefore, there is a need for a system and method of providing composite real-time dynamic imagery of a medical procedure site from multiple medical modalities, which continuously and immediately depicts the current state and condition of the medical procedure site and does so synchronously with respect to each of the modalities and without undue latency.
The present invention is directed to a system and method of providing composite real-time dynamic imagery of a medical procedure site from multiple modalities which continuously and immediately depicts the current state and condition of the medical procedure site synchronously with respect to each modality and without undue latency. The composite real-time dynamic imagery may be provided by spatially registering multiple real-time dynamic video streams from the multiple modalities to each other. Spatially registering the multiple real-time dynamic video streams to each other may provide a continuous and immediate depiction of the medical procedure site with an unobstructed and detailed view of a region of interest at the medical procedure site. As such, a surgeon, or other medical practitioner, may view a single, accurate, and current composite real-time dynamic imagery of a region of interest at the medical procedure site as he/she performs a medical procedure, and thereby, may properly and effectively implement the medical procedure.
In this regard, a first real-time dynamic video stream of a scene based on a first modality may be received. A second real-time dynamic video stream of the scene based on a second modality may also be received. The scene may comprise tissues, bones, instruments, and/or other surfaces or objects at a medical procedure site and at multiple depths. The first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream may be spatially registered to each other. Spatially registering the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream to each other may form a composite representation of the scene. A composite real-time dynamic video stream of the scene may be generated from the composite representation. The composite real-time dynamic video stream may provide a continuous and Immediate depiction of the medical procedure site with an unobstructed and detailed view at multiple depths of a region of interest at the medical procedure site. The composite real-time dynamic video stream may be sent to a display.
The first real-time dynamic video stream may depict the scene from a perspective based on a first spatial state of a first video source. Also, the second real-time dynamic video stream may depict the scene from a perspective based on a second spatial state of a second video source. The first spatial state may comprise a displacement and an orientation of the first video source, while the second spatial state may comprise a displacement and an orientation of the second video source. The first spatial state and the second spatial state may be used to synchronously align a frame of the second real-time dynamic video stream depicting a current perspective of the scene with a frame of the first real-time dynamic video stream depicting a current perspective of the scene. In this manner; the displacement and orientation of the first video source and the displacement and orientation of the second video source may be used to accurately depict the displacement and orientation of the surfaces and objects in the scene from both of the current perspectives in the composite representation.
The first modality may be two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Additionally, the first modality may comprise endoscopy, and may be selected from a group comprising laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, thoroscopy, arthoscopy, colonoscopy, bronchoscopy, cystoscopy, proctosigmoidoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and colposcopy. The second modality may be two-dimensional or three dimensional. Additionally, the second modality may comprise one or more modalities selected from a group comprising medical ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, x-ray imaging, computed tomography, and optical wavefront imaging. As such, a plurality, comprising any number, of video sources, modalities, and real-time dynamic video streams is encompassed by the present invention.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present invention and realize additional aspects thereat after reacting the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention and illustrate the best mode of practicing the invention. Upon reading the following description in tight of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the invention and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fail within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
The present invention is directed to a system and method of providing composite real-time, dynamic imagery of a medical procedure site from multiple modalities which continuously and immediately depicts the current state and condition of the medical procedure site synchronously with respect to each modality and without undue latency. The composite real-time dynamic imagery may be provided by spatially registering multiple real-time dynamic video streams from the multiple modalities to each other. Spatially registering the multiple real-time dynamic video streams to each other may provide a continuous and immediate depiction of the medical procedure site with an unobstructed and detailed view of a region of interest at the medical procedure site. As such, a surgeon, or other medical practitioner, may view a single, accurate, and current composite real-time dynamic imagery of a region of interest at the medical procedure she as he/she performs a medical procedure, and thereby, may properly and effectively implement the medical procedure.
In this regard, a first real-time dynamic video stream of a scene based on a first modality may be received. A second real-time dynamic video stream of the scene based on a second modality may also be received. The scene may comprise tissues, bones, instruments, and/or other surfaces or objects at a medical procedure site and at multiple depths. The first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream may be spatially registered to each other. Spatially registering the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream to each other may form a composite representation of the scene. A composite real-time dynamic video stream of the scene may be generated from the composite representation. The composite real-time dynamic video stream may provide a continuous and immediate depiction of the medical procedure site with an unobstructed and detailed view at multiple depths of a region of interest at the medical procedure site. The composite real-time dynamic video stream may be sent to a display.
The first real-time dynamic video stream may depict the scene from a perspective based on a first spatial state of a first video source. Also, the second real-time dynamic video stream may depict the scene from a perspective based on a second spatial state of a second video source. The first spatial state may comprise a displacement and an orientation of the first video source, while the second spatial state may comprise a displacement and an orientation of the second video source. The last spatial state and the second spatial state may be used to synchronously align a frame of the second real-time dynamic video stream depicting a current perspective of the scene with a frame of the first real-time dynamic video stream depicting a current perspective of the scene. In this manner, the displacement and orientation of the first video source and the displacement and orientation of the second video source may be used to accurately depict the displacement and orientation of the surfaces and objects from both of the current perspectives in the composite representation.
The first modality may be two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Additionally, the first modality may comprise endoscopy, and may be selected from a group comprising laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, thoroscopy, arthoscopy, colonoscopy, bronchoscopy, cystoscopy, proctosigmoidoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and colposcopy. The second modality may be two-dimensional or three dimensional. Additionally, the second modality may comprise one or more modalities selected from a group comprising medical ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, x-ray imaging, computed tomography, and optical wavefront imaging. As such, a plurality, comprising any number, of video sources, modalities, and real-time dynamic video streams is encompassed by embodiments of the present invention. Therefore, the first imaging modality may comprise a plurality of first imaging modalities and the second imaging modality may comprise a plurality of second imaging modalities.
Accordingly, as the scene changes the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream may also change, and, as such, the composite real-time dynamic video stream may also change. As such, the composite real-time dynamic video stream may be immediate in that when viewed on a display, the composite real-time dynamic video stream may continuously depict the actual current state and/or condition of the scene and, therefore, may be suitable for medical procedure sites, including, but not limited to, surgical sites. By viewing a single, accurate, and current image of the region of interest, the surgeon, or the other medical practitioner, may properly and effectively implement the medical procedure while viewing the composite real-time dynamic imagery.
In this regard, the system 10 of
The first spatial state may be represented as [Fρ,φ], and the second spatial state may be represented as [Sρ,φ]. In
Accordingly, the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 capture and/or detect images of the scene from their particular perspectives. The scene may comprise a structure 24, which may be an organ within a person's body, and a region of interest 26 within the structure 24. The region of interest 25 may comprise a mass, lesion, growth, blood vessel, and/or any other condition and/or any detail within the structure 24. The region of interest 26 may or may not be detectable using visible light. In other words, the region of interest 26 may not be visible to the human eye.
The first video source 20 produces the first real-time dynamic video stream of the scene, and the second video source produces the second real-time dynamic video stream of the scene. The first real-time dynamic video stream of the scene may be a two-dimensional or three-dimensional video stream. Similarly, the second real-time dynamic video Stream of the scene may be a two-dimensional or three-dimensional video stream.
The controller 12 using the spatial register 14 may then spatially register the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream using the first spatial state and the second spatial state to align the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream to form a real-time dynamic composite representation of the scene (step 204). The controller 12 using the composite video stream generator 16 may generate a composite real-time dynamic video stream of the scene from the composite representation (step 206). The controller 12 may then send the composite real-time dynamic video stream to a display 18.
Please note that for purposes of discussing the embodiments of the present invention, it should be understood that the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 may comprise an instrument through which an image of the scene may be captured and/or detected. In embodiments of the present invention in which an imaging device such as a camera, for example, may be fixably attached to the instrument, the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 may be understood to comprise the imaging device in combination with the instrument. In embodiments of the present invention in which the imaging device may not be fixably attached to the instrument and, therefore, may be located remotely from the instrument, the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 may be understood to comprise the instrument and not the imaging device.
Spatially registering the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream may result in a composite real-time dynamic video stream that depicts the scene from merged Perspectives of the first video source 20 and the second video source 22.
The first frame 28 may show the perspective view of the first video source 20 which may use a first medical modality, for example endoscopy. The first frame 28 may depict the outside of the structure 24. The perspective view of the structure 24 may fill the first frame 28. In other words, the edges of the perspective view of the structure 24 may be co-extensive and/or align with the corners and sides of the first frame 28. The second frame 30 may show the perspective view of the second video source 22 which may be detected using a second medical modality, for example medical ultrasonography. The second frame 30 may depict the region of interest 26 within the structure 24. As with the perspective view of the structure in the first frame 28, the perspective view of the region of interest 26 may till the second frame 30. The edges of the region of interest 26 may be co-extensive and/or align with the sides of the second frame 30.
Because the perspective view of the structure 24 may fill the first frame 28, and the perspective view of the region of interest 26 may fill the second frame 30, combining the first frame 28 as provided by the first video source 20 with the second frame 30 as provided by the second video source 22 may not provide a view that accurately depicts the displacement and orientation of the region of interest 26 within the structure 24. Therefore, the first frame 28 and the second frame 30 may be synchronized such that the composite representation 32 accurately depicts the actual displacement and orientation of the region of interest 26 within the structure 24. The first frame 28 and the second frame 30 may be synchronized by determining the spatial relationship between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 based on the first spatial state and the second spatial state. Accordingly, if the first spatial state and/or the second spatial state change, the first frame 28 and/or the second frame 30 may be synchronized based on the changed first spatial state and/or changed the second spatial state. In
Spatially registering the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream may be performed using calculations involving the first spatial state of the first video source 20, and the second spatial state of the second video source 22. The first spatial state and the second spatial state each comprise six degrees of freedom. The six degrees of freedom may comprise a displacement representing x, y, z positions which is collectively referred to herein as “ρ,” and orientation representing roll, pitch, and yaw which is collectively referred to herein as “φ.” Accordingly, the first spatial state may be represented as [Fρ,φ], and the second spatial state may be represented as [Sρ,φ]. The first special state and the second spatial state may be used to determine the spatial relationship between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22, which may be represented as [Cρ,φ].
The first spatial state [Fρ,φ] may be considered to be a transformation between the coordinate system of the first video source 20 and some global coordinate system G, and the second spatial state [Sρ,φ] may be considered to be a transformation between the coordinate system of the second video source 22 and the same global coordinate system G. The spatial relationship [Cρ,φ], then, may be considered as a transformation from the coordinate system of the second video source 22, to the coordinate system of the first video source 20.
As transforms, [Cρ,φ], [Fρ,φ], and [Sρ,φ] may each be represented in one of three equivalent forms:
Form 1 has the advantage of being easiest to use, Form 2 has the advantage of being subject to less round-off error during computations, for example it avoids gimbal lock, a mathematical degeneracy problem. Form 3 is amendable to modern computer-graphics hardware, which has dedicated machinery for composing, transmitting, and computing 4-by-4 matrices.
In some embodiments, where the first video source 20 and second video source 22 do not move with respect to each other, the spatial relationship [Cρ,φ] between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 is constant and may be measured directly. Alternatively, if embodiments where the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 move relative to each other, the spatial relationship between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 may be continually measured by a position detecting system. The position detecting system may measure an output [Cρ,φ] directly, or it may measure and report the first spatial state [Fρ,φ], the second spatial state [Sρ,φ]. In the latter case, [Cρ,φ] can be computed as [Cρ,φ] and [Cρ,φ] as follows:
[Cρ,φ]=[Fρ,φ]*[Sρ,φ]−1 (Indirect computation).
The three-dimensional position of the corner points at the second frame 30, relative to the center of the second frame 30, are constants which may be Included in the specification sheets of the second video source 22. There are four (4) such points if the second video source 22 is two-dimensional, and eight (8) such points if the second video source 22 is three-dimensional. For each such corner point, three-dimensional position relative to the first video source 20 may be computed using the formula:
cs=ct*[Cρ,φ],
where ct is the second frame 30 corner point relative to the second video source 22, and cs is the second frame 30 corner point relative to first video source 20.
If either the first video source 20 or the second video source 22 comprise a video camera, then the field-of-view of the video camera, and the frame, may be given by the manufacturer. The two-dimensional coordinates of the corner points (sx, sy) of the second frame 30 in the first frame 26 may be computed as follows:
and f=the field of view of the first video source 20.
csp is a four (4) element homogenous coordinate consisting of [xesp, yesp, zesp, hesp]. The two-dimensional coordinates are finally computed as:
sx=xesp/hesp; and
sy=yesp/hesp.
By knowing sx and sy, for all the corners of the second frame 30 relative to the first frame 28 standard compositing hardware may be used to overlay and, thereby, spatially registering the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream to generate the composite real-time dynamic video stream. As such the spatial registration of the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream may be performed using information other than an anatomical characteristic and/or a position of the subject (i.e. a person's body), the world, or some other reference coordinate system. Accordingly, the composite real-time dynamic video stream may be generated independently of the position or condition of the subject, the location and/or existence of anatomical features and/or landmarks, and/or the condition or state of the medical procedure site.
The determination whether to directly or indirectly compute the spatial relationship between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 may depend on an arrangement of components of the system, and a method used to establish the first spatial state of the first video source 20 and the second spatial state of the second video source 22.
Accordingly, because the first spatial state and the second spatial state may be fixed, the first spatial state and the second spatial state may be programmed or recorded in the controller 12. The controller 12 may then directly compute the spatial relationship between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 and, therefrom, the composite representation 32. As discussed above, the composite representation 32 represents the spatial registration of the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream. The controller 12 may then generate the composite real-time dynamic video stream from the composite representation 32.
Alternatively, the mechanical arm 34 may comprise joints 34A, 34B, 34C connecting rigid portions or links 34D, 34E of the mechanical arm 34. The joints 34A, 34B, 34C may include rotary encoders for measuring and encoding the angle of each of the joints 34A, 34B, 34C. By measuring the angle of the joints 34A, 34B, 34C and knowing the length of the links 34D, 34E, the first spatial state [Cρ,φ] of the second video source 22, relative to that of the first video source 20 may be determined. The controller 12 may receive [Cρ,φ] and, therefrom, compute the composite representation 32. As discussed above, the composite representation 32 represents the spatial registration of the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream. The controller 12 may generate the composite real-time dynamic video stream from the composite representation. The mechanical arm 34 may be a Faro-arm™ mechanical arms or any similar component that provides the functionality described above.
The infrared detection system 40 may determine the first spatial state of the first video source 20 and the second spatial state of the second video source 22 by detecting the light emitted from the first transmitter 36 and the second transmitter 38, respectively. The infrared detection system 40 may also determine the intermediary reference related to the position of the infrared detection system 40. The infrared detection system 40 may then send the first spatial state of the first video source 20, represented as [Fρ,φ], and the second spatial state of the second video source 22, represented as [Sρ,φ], to the controller 12. The controller 12 may receive the first spatial state and the second spatial state, and may compute the spatial relationship [Cρ,φ] between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 using the indirect computation and, therefrom, the composite representation 32. As discussed above, the composite representation 32 represents the spatial registration of the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream. The controller 12 may then generate the composite real-time dynamic video stream from the composite representation 32.
The Infrared detection system 40 may be any type of optoelectronic system for example the Northern Digital instrument Optotrak™. Alternatively, other position detecting systems may be used such as magnetic, GPS+ compass, inertial, acoustic, or any other equipment for measuring spatial relationship, or relative or absolute displacement and orientation.
The compound minimally-invasive instrument 48 may penetrate into the body 46 of the subject, for example the patient, to align with the structure 24 and the region of interest 26 within the structure 24. In this embodiment, the structure 24 may be an organ within the body 46, and the region of interest 26 may be a growth or lesion within the structure 24. A surgeon may use the compound minimally-invasive instrument 48 to provide both an endoscopic and ultrasonogramic composite view to accurately target the region of interest 26 for any particular treatment and/or procedure.
The endoscope 42 may be connected, either optically or in some other communicable manner to a first video camera 50. Accordingly, the first video source 20 may be understood to comprise the endoscope 42 and the first video camera 50. The first video camera 50 may capture an image of the structure 24 through the endoscope 42. From the image captured by the first video camera 50, the first video camera 50 may produce a first real-lime dynamic video stream of the image and send the first real-lime dynamic video stream to the controller 12.
The ultrasound transducer 44 may be communicably connected to a second video camera 52. Accordingly, the second video source 22 may be understood to comprise the ultrasound transducer 44 and the second video camera 52. The ultrasound transducer 44 may detect an image of the region of interest 26 within the structure 24 and communicate the image detected to the second video camera 52. The second video camera 52 may produce a second real-time dynamic video stream representing the image detected by the ultrasound transducer 44, and then send the second real-time dynamic video stream to the controller 12.
Because the compound minimally-invasive instrument 48 comprises both the endoscope 42 and the ultrasound transducer 44, the first spatial state and the second spatial state may be fixed with respect to each other, and, accordingly, the spatial relationship of the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 may be determined by the direct computation discussed above with reference to
The first spatial state and the second spatial state may be received by the controller 12. The controller 12 may then determine the spatial relationship between the first video source 20, and the second video source 22 using the direct computation discussed above. Using the spatial relationship, the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-lime dynamic video stream may be spatially registered to generate the composite representation 32. The composite real-time dynamic video stream may be generated from the composite representation 32. The controller 12 may then send the composite real-time dynamic video stream to the display 18.
Accordingly, in
To provide one of the images of the composite view for the surgeon, the endoscope 42 may be connected, either optically or in some other communicable manner, to a first video camera 50. Accordingly, the first video source 20 may be understood to comprise the endoscope 42 and the first video camera 50. The first video camera 50 may capture an image of the structure 24 through the endoscope 42. From the image captured by the first video camera 50, the first video camera 50 may produce a first real-time dynamic video stream of the image and send the first real-time dynamic video stream to the controller 12.
Additionally, to provide another image of the composite view for the surgeon, the ultrasound transducer 44 may be communicably connected to a second video camera 52. Accordingly, the second video source 22 may be understood to comprise the ultrasound transducer 44 and the second video camera 52. The ultrasound transducer 44 may detect an image of the region of interest 28 within the structure 24 and communicate the image detected to the second video camera 52. The second video camera 52 may produce a second real-time dynamic video stream representing the image detected by the ultrasound transducer 44 and then send the second real-time dynamic video stream to the controller 12.
Because the endoscope 42 and the ultrasound transducer 44 are separate, the first spatial state of the first video source 20 and the second spatial state of the second video source 22 may be determined using the indirect computation discussed above with reference to
As discussed above with respect to the system 10′, the first spatial state and the second spatial state may be determined with respect to the particular perspectives of the image of the scene that may be captured and/or detected by the first video source 20 and the second video source 22, respectively. As such the first spatial state may be used on the orientation and displacement of the endoscope 42, while the second spatial state may be based on the displacement and orientation of the ultrasound transducer 44. Additionally, in system 10′ of
The infrared detection system 40 may determine the first spatial state of the first video source 20 and the second spatial state of the second video source 22 by detecting the light emitted from the first transmitter 36 and the second transmitter 38, respectively. The infrared detection system 40 may also determine the intermediary reference related to the position of the infrared detection system 40. The infrared detection system 40 may then send the first spatial state, the second spatial state, and the intermediary reference to the controller 12. The controller 12 may receive the first spatial state, the second spatial state, and the intermediary reference and may compute the spatial relationship between the first video source 20 and the second video source 22 using the indirect computation and, therefrom, the Composite representation 32. As discussed above, the composite representation 32 represents the spatial registration of the first real-time dynamic video stream and the second real-time dynamic video stream. The controller 12 may then generate the composite real-time dynamic video stream from the composite representation 32.
For purposes of the present invention, the controller 12 may be understood to comprise devices, components and systems not shown in system 10′ and system 10″ in
in
The exemplary computer system 60 includes a processor 62, a main memory 64 (e.g., read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic random access memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM (RDRAM), etc.), and a static memory 66 (e.g., flash memory, static random access memory (SRAM), etc.), which may communicate with each other via a bus 68. Alternatively, the processor 62 may be connected to the main memory 64 and/or the static memory 66 directly or via some other connectivity means.
The processor 62 represents one or more general-purpose processing devices such as a microprocessor, central processing unit, or the like. More particularly, the processing device may be complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, or processor implementing other Instruction sets, or processors implementing a combination of instruction sets. The processor 62 is configured to execute processing logic 70 for performing the operations and steps discussed herein.
The computer system 60 may further include a network interlace device 72. It also may include an input means 74 to receive input (e.g., the first real-time dynamic video stream, the second real-time dynamic video stream, the first spatial state, the second spatial state, and the intermediary reference) and selections to be communicated to the processor 62 when executing instructions. It also may include an output means 76, inducting but not limited to the display 18 (e.g., a head-mounted display, a liquid crystal display (LCD), or a cathode ray tube (CRT)), an alphanumeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), and/or a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse).
The computer system 60 may or may not include a data storage device having a computer-readable medium 78 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions 80 (e.g., software) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The instructions 80 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 64 and/or within the processor 62 during execution thereof by the computer system 60, the main memory 64, and the processor 62 also constituting computer-readable media. The instructions 80 may further be transmitted or received over a network via the network interface device 72.
While the computer-readable medium 78 is shown in en exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “computer-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “computer-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the controller and that cause the controller to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “computer-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media, and carrier wave signals.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present invention. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/833,134 entitled “System and Method of Providing Real-Time Dynamic Imagery of a Medical Procedure Site Using Multiple Modalities”, filed Aug. 2, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/834,932 entitled “Spatially Registered Ultrasound and Endoscopic Imagery,” filed Aug. 2, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/856,670 entitled “Multiple Depth-Reconstructive Endoscopies Combined With Other Medical Imaging Modalities, And Other Related Technological Details,” filed Nov. 6, 2006, the disclosures of all of which are incorporated in there entireties for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
RE30397 | King | Sep 1980 | E |
4249539 | Vilkomerson et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4294544 | Altschuler et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4407294 | Vilkomerson | Oct 1983 | A |
4567896 | Barnea et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4671292 | Matzuk | Jun 1987 | A |
4839836 | Fonsalas | Jun 1989 | A |
4862873 | Yajima et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4884219 | Waldren | Nov 1989 | A |
4899756 | Sonek | Feb 1990 | A |
4911173 | Terwilliger | Mar 1990 | A |
4945305 | Blood | Jul 1990 | A |
5078140 | Kwoh | Jan 1992 | A |
5095910 | Powers | Mar 1992 | A |
5109276 | Nudelman et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5161536 | Vilkomerson | Nov 1992 | A |
5193120 | Gamache et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5249581 | Horbal et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261404 | Mick et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5307153 | Maruyama et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309913 | Kormos et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323002 | Sampsell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5371543 | Anderson | Dec 1994 | A |
5383454 | Bucholz | Jan 1995 | A |
5394875 | Lewis et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411026 | Carol | May 1995 | A |
5446798 | Morita et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447154 | Cinquin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452024 | Sampsell | Sep 1995 | A |
5457493 | Leddy et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5483961 | Kelly et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488431 | Gove et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489952 | Gove et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491510 | Gove | Feb 1996 | A |
5494039 | Onik et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503152 | Oakley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517990 | Kalfas et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526051 | Gove et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526812 | Dumoulin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529070 | Augustine et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531227 | Schneider | Jul 1996 | A |
5532997 | Pauli | Jul 1996 | A |
5541723 | Tanaka | Jul 1996 | A |
5558091 | Acker et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5570135 | Gove et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579026 | Tabata | Nov 1996 | A |
5588948 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5608468 | Gove et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608849 | King, Jr. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611345 | Hibbeln | Mar 1997 | A |
5611353 | Dance et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612753 | Poradish et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625408 | Matsugu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629794 | Magel et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630027 | Venkateswar et al. | May 1997 | A |
5647373 | Paltieli | Jul 1997 | A |
5660185 | Shmulewitz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662111 | Cosman | Sep 1997 | A |
5699444 | Palm | Dec 1997 | A |
5701898 | Adam et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726670 | Tabata et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728044 | Shan | Mar 1998 | A |
5758650 | Miller et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766135 | Terwilliger | Jun 1998 | A |
5784098 | Shoji et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792147 | Evan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793701 | Wright et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797849 | Vesely et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807395 | Mulier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810008 | Dekel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817022 | Vesely | Oct 1998 | A |
5820554 | Davis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829439 | Yokosawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5829444 | Ferre et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851183 | Bodiolz | Dec 1998 | A |
5870136 | Fuchs et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5891034 | Bucholz | Apr 1999 | A |
5920395 | Schulz | Jul 1999 | A |
5961527 | Whitmore, III et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6019724 | Gronningsaeter et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6048312 | Ishrak et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064749 | Hirota et al. | May 2000 | A |
6095982 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108130 | Raj | Aug 2000 | A |
6122538 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122541 | Cosman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6167296 | Shahidi | Dec 2000 | A |
6216029 | Paltieli | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6245017 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248101 | Whitmore, III et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261234 | Lin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6341016 | Malione | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348058 | Melken et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379302 | Kessman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385475 | Cinquin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6442417 | Shahidi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456868 | Saito et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6470207 | Simon et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477400 | Barrick | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478793 | Cosman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503195 | Keller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511418 | Shahidi et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6518939 | Kikuchi | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527443 | Vilsmeier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529758 | Shahidi | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545706 | Edwards et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546279 | Bova et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551325 | Neubauer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570566 | Yoshigahara | May 2003 | B1 |
6587711 | Alfano et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591130 | Shahidi | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594517 | Nevo | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597818 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604404 | Paltieli et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616610 | Steininger et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626832 | Paltieli et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6669635 | Kessman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6689067 | Sauer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695786 | Wang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711429 | Gilboa et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725082 | Sati et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733458 | Steins et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6764449 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766184 | Utzinger et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768496 | Bieger et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775404 | Pagoulatos et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782287 | Grzeszczuk et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783524 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6827723 | Carson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6873867 | Vilsmeier | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875179 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881214 | Cosman et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6895268 | Rahn et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6915150 | Cinquin et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917827 | Kienzle, III | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923817 | Carson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936048 | Hurst | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947783 | Immerz | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968224 | Kessman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978167 | Dekel et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008373 | Stoianovici et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033360 | Cinquin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072707 | Galloway, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7110013 | Ebersole et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7209776 | Leitner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7248232 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7331932 | Leitner | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351205 | Szczech et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379769 | Piron et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7385708 | Ackerman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392076 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398116 | Edwards | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7466303 | Yi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7480533 | Cosman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7505809 | Strommer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7588541 | Floyd et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7662128 | Salcudean et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7728868 | Razzaque et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7833168 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7833221 | Voegele et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846103 | Cannon, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876942 | Gilboa | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7920909 | Lyon et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7962193 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976469 | Bonde et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8023712 | Ikuma et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8038631 | Sanghvi et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8041413 | Barbagli et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050736 | Piron et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052636 | Moll et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066644 | Sarkar et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073528 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086298 | Whitmore, III et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8137281 | Huang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147408 | Bunce et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8152724 | Ridley et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8216149 | Oonuki et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221322 | Wang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228028 | Schneider | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257264 | Park et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8340379 | Razzaque et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010007919 | Shahidi | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016804 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010045979 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010384 | Shahidi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020049375 | Strommer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020077540 | Kienzle, III | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077543 | Grzeszczuk et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020135673 | Favalora et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138008 | Tsujita et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140814 | Cohen-Solal et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156375 | Kessmam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020198451 | Carson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030040743 | Cosman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030073901 | Simon et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030163142 | Paltieli et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164172 | Chumas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030231789 | Willis et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040034313 | Leitner | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078036 | Keidar | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040095507 | Bishop et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040147920 | Keidar | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181144 | Cinquin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215071 | Frank et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040238732 | State et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243146 | Chesbrough et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243148 | Wasielewski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254454 | Kockro | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050085717 | Shahidi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085718 | Shahidi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090742 | Mine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111733 | Fors et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050159641 | Kanai | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182316 | Burdette et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192564 | Cosman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219552 | Ackerman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222574 | Giordano et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251148 | Friedrich et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004275 | Vija et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020204 | Serra et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036162 | Shahidi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052792 | Boettiger et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060100505 | Viswanathan | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122495 | Cosman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184040 | Keller et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193504 | Salgo et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229594 | Francischelli et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235290 | Gabriel et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235538 | Rochetin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241450 | Da Silva et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253030 | Altmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253032 | Altmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271056 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282023 | Leitner | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293643 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016035 | Hashimoto | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032906 | Sutherland et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073155 | Park et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078346 | Park et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070167699 | Lathuiliere et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167701 | Sherman | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167705 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167801 | Webler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225553 | Shahidi | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239281 | Gotte et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244488 | Metzger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255136 | Kjell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270718 | Rochetin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276234 | Shahidi | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004481 | Bax et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080004516 | DiSilvestro et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030578 | Razzaque et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039723 | Suri et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051910 | Kammerzell et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091106 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114235 | Unal et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161824 | McMillen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200794 | Teichman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208031 | Kurpad et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208081 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214932 | Mollard et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232679 | Hahn et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080287805 | Li | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024030 | Lachaine et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090118724 | Zvuloni et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137907 | Takimoto et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090226069 | Razzaque et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234369 | Bax et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090312629 | Razzaque et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100045783 | State et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100198045 | Razzaque et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208963 | Kruecker et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100268067 | Razzaque et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268072 | Hall et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268085 | Kruecker et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100305448 | Dagonnau et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312121 | Guan | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110043612 | Keller et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046483 | Fuchs et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057930 | Keller | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082351 | Razzaque et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110130641 | Razzaque et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137156 | Razzaque et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110201976 | Sanghvi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110237947 | Boctor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251483 | Razzaque et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282188 | Burnside et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288412 | Deckman et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295108 | Cox et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301451 | Rohling | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035473 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059260 | Robinson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071759 | Hagy et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078094 | Nishina et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101370 | Razzaque et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120108955 | Razzaque et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143029 | Silverstein et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120143055 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165679 | Orome et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120259210 | Harhen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1636520 | Jul 2005 | CN |
100381108 | Apr 2008 | CN |
0 427 358 | May 1991 | EP |
1955284 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2005-058584 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-323669 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2009-517177 | Apr 2009 | JP |
WO 03032837 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2005010711 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2007019216 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007-067323 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007067323 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008017051 | Feb 2008 | WO |
PCTUS2009032028 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009094646 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2010057315 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010096419 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2009063423 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2011014687 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“3D Laparoscope Technology,” http://www.inneroptic.com/tech—3DL.htm, copyright 2007 InnerOptic Technology, Inc. printed Sep. 19, 2007, 2 pages. |
“Cancer Facts & Figures 2004,” www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF—finaPWSecured.pdf, copyright 2004 American Cancer Society, Inc., printed Sep. 19, 2007, 60 pages. |
“David Laserscanner <-Latest News <- Institute for Robotics and Process Control <- Te . . . ,” http://www/rob.cs.tu-bs.de/en/news/david, printed Sep. 19, 2007, 1 page. |
“Laser scanned 3d model Final” video, still image of video attached, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v+DaLgIgmoUf8, copyright 2007 YouTube, LLC, printed Sep. 19, 2007, 2 pages. |
“Olympus Endoscopic Ultrasound System,” www.olympusamerica.com/msg—section/download—brochures/135—b—gfum130.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 20 pages. |
“Point Grey Research Inc.—Imaging Products—Triclops SDK Samples,” http://www.ptgrey.com/products/triclopsSDK/samples.asp, copyright 2007 Point Grey Research Inc., printed Sep. 19, 2007, 1 page. |
“Robbins, Mike—Computer Vision Research—Stereo Depth Perception,” http://www.compumike.com/vision/stereodepth. php, copyright 2007 Michael F. Robbins, printed Sep. 19, 2007, 3 pages. |
“RUE: Registered Ultrasound-Endoscope,” copyright 2007 InnerOptic Technology, Inc., 2 pages. |
Advertisement, “Inspeck 3DC 3D Capturor,” Inspeck 3DC 3D Capturor (www.inspeck.com), 1998. |
Advertisement, “Virtual 3D High Speed Non-Contact Surface Perception,” Virtual 3-D Technologies Corporation (www.virtual3dtech.com)., Dec. 21, 1998. |
Advertisements, “Virtuoso,” Visual Interface, Inc. (www.visint.com), Dec. 21, 1998. |
Akka, “Automatic Software Control of Display Parameters for Stereoscopic Graphics Images,” SPIE vol. 1669: Stereoscopic Displays and Applications III, pp. 31-38 (1992). |
Ali et al., “Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Imaging to Probe Differences in Water Content in Normal and Cancer Human Prostate Tissues,” Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment; Oct. 2004; 3(5):491-497; Adenine Press. |
Andrei State et al., “Case Study: Observing a Volume Rendered Fetus within a Pregnant Patient,” Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 1994, pp. 364-368, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜fuchs/publications/cs-ObservVolRendFetus94.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 5 pages. |
Andrei State et al., “Simulation-Based Design and Rapid Prototyping of a Parallax-Free, Orthoscopic Video See-Through Head-Mounted Display,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) 2005, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜andrei/pubs/2005—ISMAR—VSTHMD—design.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 4 pages. |
Andrei State et al., “Superior Augmented Reality Registration by Integrating Landmark Tracking and Magnetic Tracking,” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 429-438, available from www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fal101/cs597d/papers/state96.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 10 pages. |
Andrei State et al., “Technologies for Augmented Reality Systems: Realizing Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsies,” Computer Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 429-438, available from www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall01/cs597d/papers/state96.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007. |
Aylward et al., Analysis of the Parameter Space of a Metric for Registering 3D Vascular Images, in W. Niessen and M. Viergever (Eds.): MICCAI 2001, LNCS 2208, pp. 932-939, 2001. |
Aylward et al., Registration and Analysis of Vascular Images, International Journal of Computer Vision 55(2/3), 123-138, 2003. |
Azuma, “A Survey of Augmented Reality,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4:1-48 (Aug. 1997). |
Bajura, Michael et al., “Merging Virtual Objects with the Real World: Seeing Ultrasound Imagery within the Patient,” Computer Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1992, vol. 26(2), pp. 203-210, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜fuchs/publications/MergVirtObjs92. |
Benavides et al., “Multispectral digital colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical cancer,” Optics Express; May 19, 2003; 11(10) Optical Society of America; USA. |
Beraldin, J.A. et al., “Optimized Position Sensors for Flying-Spot Active Triangulation Systems,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on a 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM), Banff, Alberta, Canada, Oct. 6-10, 2003, pp. 334-341, NRC 47083, copyright 2003 National Research Council of Canada, http/iit-iti.cnrc-nrc.gc.ca/iit-publications-iti/docs/NRC-47083.pdf, printed Sep. 19, 2007, 9 pages. |
Billinghurst, M. et al., Research Directions in Handheld AR; Int. J. of Virtual Reality 5(2),51-58 (2006). |
Bishop, Azum R., G.; Improving Static and Dynamic Registration in an Optical See-Through HMO; Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '94, Computer Graphics, Annual Conference Series, 1994, 197-204 (1994). |
Blais, F., “Review of 20 Years of Range Sensor Development,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, 13(1): 231-240, Jan. 2004, NRC 46531, copyright 2004 National Research Council of Canada, http://iit-iti.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/iit-publications-iti/docs/NRC-46531.pdf, printed Sep. 19, 2007, 14 pages. |
Bouguet, Jean-Yves, “Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab,” www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib—doc, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 5 pages. |
Buxton et al.; “Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Dec. 1991; 98:1273-1276. |
Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2004; National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids; 2004; American Cancer Society; USA. |
Cantor et al., “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions,” Diagnostic Strategies for SILs; Feb. 1998; 91(2):270-277. |
Catalano et al., “Multiphase helical CT findings after percutaneous ablation procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma.” Abdom. Imaging, 25(6),2000, pp. 607-614. |
Chiriboga et al., “Infrared Spectroscopy of Human Tissue. IV. Detection of Dysplastic and Neoplastic Changes of Human Cervical Tissue Via Infrared Microscopy,” Cellular and Molecular Biology; 1998; 44(1): 219-229. |
Crawford, David E. et al., “Computer Modeling of Prostate Biopsy: Tumor Size and Location—Not Clinical Significance—Determine Cancer Detection,” Journal of Urology, Apr. 1998, vol. 159(4), pp. 1260-1264, 5 pages. |
Deering, Michael “High Resolution Virtual Reality.” Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '92, Computer Graphics, 26(2), 1992, pp. 195-202. |
Depiero et al., “3-D Computer Vision Using Structured Light: Design, Calibration and Implementation Issues,” The University of Tennessee, pp. 1-46, (1996). |
Dodd, G.D. et al. “Minimally invasive treatment of malignant hepatic tumors: at the threshold of a major breakthrough.” Radiographies 20(1),2000, pp. 9-27. |
Drascic et al., “Perceptual Issues in Augmented Reality,” SPIE vol. 2653: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III, pp. 123-134 (Feb. 1996). |
Fahey et al., “Meta-analysis of Pap Test Accuracy; American Journal of Epidemiology,” 1995 141(7):680-689; The John Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health; USA. |
Foxlin et al., An Inertial Head-Orientation Tracker with Automatic Drift Compensation for Use with HMD's, in Virtual Reality Software & Technology, Proceedings of the VRST Conference, pp. 159-173, Singapore, Aug. 23-26, 1994. |
Fronheiser et al., Real-Time 3D Color Doppler for Guidance of Vibrating Interventional Devices, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 149-152 (2004). |
Fuchs, Henry et al., “Augmented Reality Visualization for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 1998, pp. 934-943, available from www.cs.unc.edu/fuchs/publications/AugRealVis—LaparoSurg9. |
Garrett, William F. et al., “Real-Time Incremental Visualization of Dynamic Ultrasound Volumes Using Parallel BSP Trees, ”Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 1996, pp. 235-240, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜andrei/pubs/1996—VIS—dualBSP—Mac.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 7 pages. |
Georgakoudi et al., “Trimodal spectroscopy for the detection and characterization of cervical precancers in vivo,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Mar. 2002; 186(3):374-382; USA. |
Herline et al., Surface Registration for Use in Interactive, Image-Guided Liver Surgery, Computer Aided Surgery 5:11-17 (2000). |
Holloway, R.; Registration Error Analysis for Augmented Reality; Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(4), 413-432 (1997). |
Hornung et al., “Quantitative near-infrared spectroscopy of cervical dysplasia in vivo,” Human Reproduction; 1999; 14(11):2908-2916; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. |
Howard et al., An Electronic Device for Needle Placement during Sonographically Guided Percutaneous Intervention, Radiology 2001; 218:905-911. |
Jacobs, Marco C. et al., “Managing Latency in Complex Augmented Reality Systems,” ACM SIGGRAPH Proceedings of the Symposium of Interactive 3D Graphics 1997, pp. 49-54, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜us/Latency//ManagingRelativeLatency.html, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 12 pages. |
Kanbara et al., “A Stereoscopic Video See-through Augmented Reality System Based on Real-time Vision-Based Registration,” Nara Institute of Science and Technology, pp. 1-8 (2000). |
Lass, Amir, “Assessment of Ovarian Reserve,” Human Reproduction, 2004, vol. 19(3), pp. 467-469, available from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.orgcgi/reprint/19/31467, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 3 pages. |
Lee et al., “Modeling Real Objects Using Video See-Through Augmented Reality,” Presence, 11(2):144-157 (Apr. 2002). |
Leven et al., DaVinci Canvas: A Telerobotic Surgical System with Integrated, Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic Ultrasound Capability, in J. Duncan and G. Gerig (Eds.): MICCAI 2005, LNCS 3749, pp. 811-818, 2005. |
Levy et al., An Internet-Connected, Patient Specific, Deformable Brain Atlas Integrated into a Surgical Navigation System, Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 10, No. 3. Suppl. 1 (August), 1997: pp. 231-237. |
Livingston, Mark A. et al., “Magnetic Tracker Calibration for Improved Augmented Reality Registration,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1997, vol. 6(5), pp. 532-546, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜andrei/pubs/1997—Presence—calibr.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 14 pages. |
Matsunaga et al., “The Effect of the Ratio Difference of Overlapped Areas of Stereoscopic Images on each Eye in a Teleoperalion,” Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems VII, Proceedings of SPIE, 3957:236-243 (2000). |
Meehan, Michael et al., “Effect of Latency on Presence in Stressful Virtual Environment,” Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2003, pp. 141-148, available from http://www.cs.unc.edu/˜eve/pubs.html, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 9 pages. |
Milgram et al., “Adaptation Effects in Stereo due to Online Changes in Camera Configuration,” SPIE vol. 1669-13, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications III, pp. 1-12 (1992). |
Mitchell et al., “Colposcopy for the Diagnosis of Squamous Intraepithelial lesions: A metaanalysis,” Obstetrics and Gynecology; Apr. 1998; 91(4):626-631. |
Nakamoto et al., 3D Ultrasound System Using a Magneto-optic Hybrid Tracker for Augmented Reality Visualization in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery, in T. Dohi and R. Kikinis (Eds.): MICCAI 2002, LNCS 2489, pp. 148-155, 2002. |
Nordstrom et al., “Identification of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Using UV-Excited Fluorescence and Diffuse-Reflectance Tissue Spectroscopy,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine; 2001; 29; pp. 118-127; Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
Ohbuchi et al., “An Incremental Volume Rendering Algorithm for Interactive 3D Ultrasound Imaging”, UNC-CH Computer Science Technical Report TR91-003, (1991). |
Ohbuchi et al., “Incremental Volume Reconstruction and Rendering for 3D Ultrasound Imaging,” Visualization in Biomedical Computing, SPIE Proceedings, pp. 312-323, (Oct. 13, 1992). |
Ohbuchi, “Incremental Acquisition and Visualization of 3D Ultrasound Images,” Ph.D. Dissertation, UNC-CH Computer Science Technical Report TR95—023, (1993). |
PCT, The International Search Report of the International Searching Authority, mailed Sep. 9, 2009, for case PCT/US2009/032028. |
PCT. The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Sep. 9, 2009, for case PCT/US2009/032028. |
Progue, Brian W. et al., “Analysis of acetic acid-induced whitening of high-grade squamous intraepitheliallesions,” Journal of Biomedical Optics; Oct. 2001; 6(4):397-403. |
Raij, A.B., et al., Comparing Interpersonal Interactions with a Virtual Human to Those with a Real Human; IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(3), 443-457 (2007). |
Robinett et al., “A Computational Model for the Stereoscopic Optics of a Head-Mounted Display,” SPIE vol. 1457, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II, pp. 140-160 (1991). |
Rolland et al., Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Winter 1995, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 24-49. |
Rosenthal, Michael et al., “Augmented Reality Guidance for Needle Biopsies: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in Phantoms,” Proceedings of MICCAI 2001, eds. W. Niessen and M. Viergever, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2001, vol. 2208, pp. 240-248. |
Rosenthal, Michael et al., “Augmented Reality Guidance for Needle Biopsies: An Initial Randomized, Controlled Trial in Phantoms,” Proceedings of Medical Image Analysis, Sep. 2002, vol. 6(3), pp. 313-320, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜fuchs/publications/. |
Splechtna, Fuhrmann A. et al., Comprehensive calibration and registration procedures for augmented reality; Proc. Eurographics Workshop on Virtual Environments 2001,219-228 (2001). |
State, Andrei et al., “Stereo Imagery from the UNC Augmented Reality System for Breast Biopsy Guidance” Proc. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR) 2003, Newport Beach, CA, Jan. 22-25, (2003). |
State, Andrei “Exact Eye Contact with Virtual Humans.” Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Human Computer Interaction 2007 (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct. 20, 2007), pp. 138-145. |
State, Andrei et al., “Interactive Volume Visualization on a Heterogenous Message-Passing Multicomputer,” Proceedings of 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1995, pp. 69-74, 208, available from www.cs.unc.edu/˜andrei/pubs/1995—I3D—vol2—Mac.pdf, printed Sep. 20, 2007, 7 pages. |
Takagi et al., “Development of a Stereo Video See-through HMD for AR Systems,” IEEE, pp. 68-77 (2000). |
Ultraguide 1000 System, Ultraguide, www.ultraguideinc.com, 1998. |
van Staveren et al., “Light Scattering in Intralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400-1100 nm,” Applied Optics; Nov. 1991; 30(31):4507-4514. |
Viola et al., “Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 1-29 (1997). |
Viola, Paul A., Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT-Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Technical Report No. 1548 (Jun. 1995). |
Ware et al., “Dynamic Adjustment of Stereo Display Parameters,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Many and Cybernetics, 28(1):1-19 (1998). |
Watson et al., “Using Texture Maps to Correct for Optical Distortion in Head-Mounted Displays,” Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual Symposium '95, IEEE, pp. 1-7 (1995). |
Welch, Hybrid Self-Tracker: An Inertial/Optical Hybrid Three-Dimensional Tracking System, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Department of Computer Science, TR 95-048.(1995). |
Yinghui Che, et al.,Real-Time Deformation Using Modal Analysis on Graphics Hardware, Graphite 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Nov. 29-Dec. 2, 2006. |
Zitnick et al., “Multi-Base Stereo Using Surface Extraction,” Visual Interface Inc., (Nov. 24, 1996). |
Fuchs, et al.: “Virtual Environments Technology to Aid Needle Biopsies of the Breast,” Health Care in the Information Age, Ch. 6, pp. 60-61, Presented in San Diego, Jan. 17-20, 1996, published by IOS Press and Ohmsha Feb. 1996. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/828,826, filed Jul. 26, 2007, Kurtis P. Keller et al. |
PCT/US2003/17987, filed Dec. 18, 2003, University of North Carolina. |
Aylward et al., Intra-Operative 3D Ultrasound Augmentation, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Washington, Jul. 2002. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 13, 2010, PCT/US2010/024378. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 3, 2011, PCT/US2010/043760. |
PCT, International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US07/75122, mailing date Aug. 20, 2008. |
Yinghui et al., Real-Time Deformation Using Modal Analysis on Graphics Hardware, Graphite 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Nov. 29-Dec. 2, 2006. |
InnerAim Brochure; 3D Visualization Software for Simpler, Safer, more Precise Aiming, Published no earlier than Apr. 1, 2010. |
InVision System Brochure; A “GPS” for Real-Time 3D Needle Visualization & Guidance, Published no earlier than Mar. 1, 2008. |
InVision User Manual; Professional Instructions for Use, Published no earlier than Dec. 1, 2008. |
PCT, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, re PCT Application No. PCT/US07/75122, mailing date Mar. 3, 2009. |
Raz et al, Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging—Guided Focal Laser Therapy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer, European Urology 58, pp. 173-177. Mar. 12, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100198045 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60834932 | Aug 2006 | US | |
60856670 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11833134 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 12760274 | US |