System and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network

Abstract
A system and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network are described. Multiple predetermined language constructs are communicated to a first entity as a first transmission over the network. Responsive to selection by the first entity of a language construct from the predetermined language constructs, a translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct is identified. Finally, the translated language construct is communicated to a second entity as a second transmission over the network.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of network-based communications and, more specifically, to a system and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network, such as the Internet.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The explosive growth of the Internet as a publication and interactive communication platform has created an electronic environment that is changing the way business is transacted. As the Internet becomes increasingly accessible around the world, communications between users that utilize different spoken or written languages increase exponentially.


Several attempts have been made to facilitate such communications and to provide translation software packages residing on a computer and configured to translate text or voice communications from one language to another. Some of these translation software packages, however, can be expensive and can result in a financial burden for a user of such software packages. Furthermore, such software packages require considerable storage capacity to be available on the computer.


Another drawback of the translation software packages relates to their limited applicability. For example, current technology allows for translation of text through common text translation software installed on a computer. The translation may be accomplished in a variety of ways, one of which is direct word for word translation of the communication, which is imperfect and produces grammatically incorrect sentences in the translated language. Current technology also allows for limited translation of voice communications through speech recognition software installed on the computer. However, spoken language translation is mostly available in restricted domains, where the database of recognizable words is limited to a specific set of words.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A system and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network are described. Multiple predetermined language constructs are communicated to a first entity as a first transmission over the network. Responsive to selection by the first entity of a language construct from the predetermined language constructs, a translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct is identified. Finally, the translated language construct is communicated to a second entity as a second transmission over the network.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings, and from the detailed description, which follows below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not intended to be limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary network-based transaction facility in the form of a network-based auction facility.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary database, maintained by and accessed via a database engine server, which at least partially implements and supports the auction facility.



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary stored constructs table.



FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary stored translated constructs table.



FIG. 4 is an interaction diagram illustrating a sequence of interactions, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary environment in which the interaction sequence illustrated in FIG. 4 may be employed.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network.



FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the exemplary form of a computer system within which a set of instructions may be executed.



FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an e-mail message, according to an embodiment, that includes multiple interactive fields.



FIG. 9 illustrates a reply message, according to one embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A system and method to facilitate translation of communication between entities over a network are described. In the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, electrical, functional, and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary network-based transaction facility in the form of a network-based auction facility 10. While an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is described within the context of an auction facility, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention will find application in many different types of computer-based, and network-based, commerce facilities.


The auction facility 10 includes one or more of a number of types of front-end servers, namely communications servers in the exemplary form of page servers 12 that deliver web pages to multiple entities (e.g., markup language documents), picture servers 14 that dynamically deliver images to be displayed within the web pages, listing servers 16, processing servers in the exemplary form of Common Gateway Interface (CGI) or Internet Server Application Program Interface (ISAPI) servers 18 that provide an intelligent interface to the back-end of the auction facility 10, and search servers 20 that handle search requests to the auction facility 10. In addition, the auction facility 10 includes e-mail servers 21 that provide, inter alia, automated e-mail communications to/from entities of the facility 10.


The auction facility 10 further includes one or more back-end servers, for example a database engine server 22, a search indexer server 24 and a credit card database server 26, each of which maintains and facilitates access to a respective database 23. The network-based auction facility 10, such as an Internet-based auction facility 10, may be accessed by a client program 30, such as a browser (e.g., the Internet Explorer browser distributed by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on a client machine 32 and accesses the facility 10 via a network 34, such as, for example, the Internet. Other examples of networks that a client may utilize to access the auction facility 10 includes a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) network.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary database 23, maintained by and accessed via the database engine server 22, which at least partially implements and supports the auction facility 10. The database 23 may, in one embodiment, be implemented as a relational database, and includes a number of tables having entries, or records, that are linked by indices and keys. In an alternative embodiment, the database 23 may be implemented as a collection of objects in an object-oriented database.


Central to the database 23 shown in FIG. 2 is a user table 40, which contains a record for each entity or user of the auction facility 10. The record is shown to include entity information or user information that may further include a language preference. Each user may operate as a seller, a buyer, or both, within the auction facility 10. The database 23 also includes items tables 42 that may be linked to the user table 40. Specifically, the table 42 includes a seller items table 44 and a bidder items table 46. A user record in the user table 40 may be linked to multiple items that are being, or have been, auctioned via the auction facility 10. A link indicates whether the user is a seller or a bidder (or buyer) with respect to items for which records exist within the items table 42.


The database 23 further includes a note table 48 populated with note records that may be linked to one or more item records within the items table 42 and/or to one or more user records within the user table 40. Each note record within the note table 48 may include, inter alia, a comment, description, history, or other information pertaining to an item being auctioned via the auction facility 10, or pertaining to a user of the auction facility 10.


A number of other tables are also shown to be linked to the user table 40, such as a user past aliases table 50, a feedback table 52, a bids table 54, an accounts table 56, and an account balances table 58.


The database 23 is also shown to include two tables specifically to enable an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. A stored construct table 60 stores a predetermined number of language constructs, such as sentences, phrases, questions, or any other known types of language constructs. A stored translated construct table 70 contains a number of records, each record storing translated language constructs corresponding to the language constructs stored in table 60. Prior to any communication between client 32 and the network-based auction facility 10, each translated language construct is generated and stored in the stored translated construct table 70, and the correspondence to one or more predetermined language constructs in the stored language constructs table 60 is defined, such that each translated language construct includes a predetermined translation of the corresponding predetermined language construct.



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a stored construct table 60. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, the table 60 includes a construct ID field 62 to store a unique identifier for each stored language construct to be used in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The table 60 further includes a construct field 64 to store each language construct maintained within the database 23.



FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a stored translated construct table 70. As illustrated in FIG. 3B, the table 70 includes a construct ID field 72 to store a unique identifier for each translated language construct, which corresponds to the identifier of the language construct stored within field 62. The table 70 further includes a language ID field 74 to store an identifier for a language pertaining to the translated construct, and a translated construct field 76 to store the translated construct in the particular language identified in the language ID field 74.



FIG. 4 is an interaction diagram illustrating a sequence 90 of interactions, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities in the exemplary form of a first user 92 and a second user 94. While the sequence 90 describes a client-server environment, whereby communications between the first and second users 92 and 94 are facilitated by, or performed through, a website 96, it will also be appreciated that the teachings of the present inventions may be applied to a peer-to-peer environment, whereby the users 92 and 94 communicate directly and not through the website 96.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, the sequence 90 commences at block 105 with the selection by the first user 92 of a language construct and of a user identifier of the second user 94. The language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from a drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs, the drop-down list being displayed in a first interactive area of a web form communicated to the first user 92 from the website 96. Alternatively, the language construct may be selected from a window, which presents the web form containing the predetermined language constructs to the first user 92. The predetermined language constructs are generated and stored in the stored constructs table 60 of the database 23 prior to being communicated to the first user 92 in the drop-down list or web form.


At block 110, the language construct is communicated from the first user 92 to the website 96 via the network 34 in a message directed to the second user 94, for example an electronic mail (e-mail) message.


At block 115, the website 96 (e.g., the auction facility 10) utilizes the search servers 20 to conduct a search of the user table 40, the stored constructs table 60, and the stored translated constructs table 70 to retrieve a translated language construct, based on the user identifier corresponding to the second user 94. The search of the user table 40 locates the user information pertaining to the second user 94, including a language preference of the second user 94, and the search of the tables 60 and 70 locates the translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct and the language preference of the second user 94. In one embodiment, the predetermined language constructs and the translated language constructs are generated and stored in respective tables 60 and 70 prior to the language constructs being communicated to the first user 92, so as to define a correspondence between each predetermined language construct and at least one associated translated language construct. Alternatively, the storing is so as to define a correspondence between a set of the translated language constructs, wherein each translated language construct of the set includes a predetermined translation of a common underlying language construct.


At block 120, the website 96 generates a translated message to be transmitted to the second user 94. In one embodiment, the translated message is an e-mail message generated by the e-mail servers 21 and directed to the second user 94, which contains the translated language construct. Alternatively, the translated e-mail message may contain multiple interactive fields to allow the second user 94 to respond to the first user 92.


At block 125, the translated message is communicated to the second user 94. In one embodiment, an e-mail message containing the translated language construct is communicated by the e-mail servers 21 to the second user 94.


At block 130, the second user 94 selects a further language construct and a user identifier of the first user 92 to which the further language construct is to be communicated. The further language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from the drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs translated in the language preference of the second user 94, the drop-down list being displayed in one interactive field of the multiple fields communicated to the second user 94 from the website 96. For example, the FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an e-mail message 122, according to an embodiment, that includes multiple interactive fields 123, 124. The interactive field 123 is shown to include a drop-down list 126 that may contain multiple predetermined language constructs translated in the language preference of the second user 94 to allow the second user 94 to respond to the translated language construct (WHAT IS YOUR ADDRESS?) from the first user 92. Alternatively, the second user 94 may only receive the translated message from the website 96 and take no further action.


At block 135, the further language construct is communicated from the second user 94 to the website 96 via the network 34 in a reply message directed to the first user 92, for example an electronic mail (e-mail) message. FIG. 9 illustrates a reply message 136, according to one embodiment. The reply message 136 is shown to include a language construct 137 selected by the second user 94 in response to the translated language construct from the first user 92.


Returning to FIG. 5, at block 140, the website 96 (e.g., the auction facility 10) utilizes the search servers 20 to conduct a search of the user table 40, the stored constructs table 60, and the stored translated constructs table 70 to retrieve a translated further language construct, based on the user identifier corresponding to the first user 92. The search of the user table 40 locates the user information pertaining to the first user 92, including a language preference of the first user 92, and the search of the tables 60 and 70 locates the translated further language construct corresponding to the selected further language construct and the language preference of the first user 92.


At block 145, the website 96 generates a translated reply message to be transmitted to the first user 92. In one embodiment, the translated reply message is an e-mail message generated by the e-mail servers 21 and directed to the first user 92, which contains the translated further language construct.


At block 150, the translated reply message is communicated to the first user 92. In one embodiment, an e-mail message containing the translated further language construct is communicated by the e-mail servers 21 to the first user 92.


It should be noted that the sequence 90 may have any one of a number of applications and may be implemented within any number of environments. For example, the sequence 90 may be used to communicate information from any one entity, such as first or second users 92 and 94, to the website 96 in a language preferred by the respective entity. The website 96 may subsequently translate the information and use it in any one of a number of applications, such as in the preparation of item listings, or in the updating of the user information.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary environment in which the interaction sequence 90 may be employed. As illustrated in FIG. 5, client machines 32 are shown to reside outside the context of a website, such as the exemplary website 96 shown in FIG. 4. Accordingly, this embodiment describes an application which allows a first user of a client machine 32, such as the first client machine 32, to communicate language constructs to a second user of a further client machine 32, such as the second client machine 32, both of which reside outside the website 96 or any other commerce facility. Alternatively, each user of the client machines 32 may only communicate language constructs to the website 96 in order to request performance of applications by the website 96.


Referring to FIG. 5, the first user selects a language construct and a user identifier of the second user in an e-mail client or browser 322 that executes in the first client machine 32, the second user being the recipient of an e-mail message 324 containing the language construct to be communicated by the first user. The language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from a drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs, the drop-down list being displayed in a first interactive area of a web form communicated to the first user from the website 96. Alternatively, the language construct may be selected from a window, which presents the web form containing the predetermined language constructs to the first user.


The message is shown to be communicated to the e-mail servers 21 of the website 96. Specifically, the message containing the language construct may be communicated, in one embodiment, as an e-mail message or by utilizing any other transfer protocol or communication. The e-mail servers 21 receive the message using the transmission functions 217 and proceed to parse the message to extract the language construct and the user identifier for the second user that operates the second client machine 32.


The search servers 20 within the website 96 receive the language construct and the user identifier and search tables within corresponding databases using search functions 205 to provide a translated language construct to be communicated to the second user. Specifically, in one embodiment, the search servers 20 search the user table 40 shown in FIG. 2 to locate user information pertaining to the second user, including a language preference of the second user. The search servers 20 further search the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 shown in FIG. 2 to locate the translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct and the language preference of the second user.


The translated language construct is subsequently communicated to the e-mail servers 21. The e-mail servers 21 generate a translated e-mail message containing the translated language construct using message generation functions 215. The translated e-mail message is then communicated to the second client machine via the transmission functions 217.


In one embodiment, the second user selects a further language construct and a user identifier of the first user in an e-mail client or browser 326 that executes in the second client machine 32, the first user being the recipient of a reply e-mail message 328 containing the further language construct to be communicated by the second user. The language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from a drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs translated in the language preference of the second user, the drop-down list being displayed in one interactive field of multiple interactive fields that may be communicated to the second user from the website 96. Alternatively, the second user may only receive the translated e-mail message and take no further action.


The reply message is shown to be communicated to the e-mail servers 21 of the website 96. Specifically, the reply message containing the further language construct may be communicated, in one embodiment, as an e-mail message or by utilizing any other transfer protocol or communication. The e-mail servers 21 receive the reply message using the transmission functions 217 and proceed to parse the reply message to extract the further language construct and the user identifier for the first user that operates the first client machine 32.


The search servers 20 within the website 96 receive the further language construct and the user identifier and search tables within corresponding databases using search functions 205 to provide a translated further language construct to be communicated to the first user. Specifically, in one embodiment, the search servers 20 search the user table 40 shown in FIG. 2 to locate user information pertaining to the first user, including a language preference of the first user. The search servers 20 further search the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 shown in FIG. 2 to locate the translated further language construct corresponding to the selected further language construct and the language preference of the first user.


The translated further language construct is subsequently communicated to the e-mail servers 21. The e-mail servers 21 generate a translated reply message containing the translated further language construct using message generation functions 215. The translated reply message is then communicated to the first client machine via the transmission functions 217.


An alternative application would allow each user of the first or second client machines 32 to communicate selected language constructs to the website 96. In this case, the website 96 may perform search and translation operations and use the translated language construct to update listings via listing servers 16, or to update user information in the user table 40.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network. It will be appreciated that the method may, as described above, be utilized to facilitate translation of communications, and is not limited to the context of a network-based auction facility.


As illustrated in FIG. 6, at processing block 610, a web form containing language constructs is communicated to the first user. At processing block 615, a selected language construct and a user identifier of the second user are received from the first user.


At processing block 620, the user table 40 is searched to locate user information pertaining to the second user, including a language preference of the second user. At processing block 625, the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 are searched to retrieve a translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct.


At processing block 630, a translated message containing the translated language construct and multiple interactive fields is generated. At processing block 635, the translated message is communicated to the second user.


At processing block 640, a further language construct and a user identifier of the first user are received from the second user. At processing block 645, the user table 40 is searched to locate user information pertaining to the first user, including a language preference of the first user. At processing block 650, the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 are searched to retrieve a translated further language construct corresponding to the selected further language construct.


At processing block 655, a translated reply message containing the translated further language construct is generated. Finally, at processing block 660, the translated reply message is communicated to the first user.



FIG. 7 shows a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the exemplary form of a computer system 300 within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed above, may be executed. In alternative embodiments, the machine may comprise a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, Personal Digital Assistant (FDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance or any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify actions to be taken by that machine.


The computer system 300 includes a processor 302, a main memory 304 and a static memory 306, which communicate with each other via a bus 308. The computer system 300 may further include a video display unit 310 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 300 also includes an alphanumeric input device 312 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 314 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 316, a signal generation device 18 (e.g., a speaker), and a network interface device 320.


The disk drive unit 316 includes a machine-readable medium 324 on which is stored a set of instructions (i.e., software) 326 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described above. The software 326 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 304 and/or within the processor 302. The software 326 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 320.


It is to be understood that embodiments of this invention may be used as or to support software programs executed upon some form of processing core (such as the CPU of a computer) or otherwise implemented or realized upon or within a machine or computer readable medium. A machine readable medium includes any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer). For example, a machine readable medium includes read-only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.); or any other type of media suitable for storing or transmitting information.


In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method to facilitate translation of communications between hardware entities over a network, said method comprising: communicating a plurality of predetermined language constructs in a first language to a first entity as a first transmission over said network, the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language displayed to the first entity in a first set of one or more interactive fields, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the first language being associated with a predetermined numerical identifier;receiving, from said first entity, an identifier of a second entity;receiving, from said first entity, a first numerical identifier of a first language construct selected by the first entity from said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language, the first numerical identifier comprising a numerical indicator of the first language construct and not including the text of the first language construct;responsive to receipt of said first numerical identifier, determining a translated language construct corresponding to said first numerical identifier, said determining further comprises:retrieving entity information relating to said second entity based on the identifier of said second entity; andretrieving said translated language construct from a table based on said entity information and said first numerical identifier of the first language construct;communicating said translated language construct to said second entity as a second transmission over said network; andcommunicating the plurality of predetermined language constructs in a second language to the second entity in a second set of one or more interactive fields, the second entity to respond to the first entity by selecting a second language construct from the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the second language, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the second language being associated with the predetermined numerical identifier.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said entity information further comprises a language preference of said second entity.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein said first language construct is a predetermined question that is asked by said first entity in an electronic commerce transaction over said network.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said predetermined question is translated responsive to said selection of said first entity by retrieving said translated language construct from a table that includes a plurality translated language constructs of said predetermined question that are respectively translated into different languages.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the second transmission includes a plurality of interactive fields to allow said second entity to respond to said predetermined question that is asked by said first entity.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein said plurality of interactive fields includes a first interactive field, wherein said first interactive field includes a drop down list that contains a second plurality of predetermined language constructs that respectively respond to said predetermined question and are respectively translated into a second language based on a language preference of said second entity.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, further including receiving a reply message from said second entity that includes a selection of the said second entity from said first interactive field, said selection of the second entity including a response from said second entity to said predetermined question that is asked by said first entity.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein said first transmission is a Hyper Text Markup Language (HTTP) message.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein said second transmission is an electronic mail message.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein said identifier of said second entity is an electronic mail address of said second entity.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1, further comprising, at a network-based transaction facility, storing said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and an associated plurality of translated language constructs so as to define a correspondence between each language construct of said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and at least one associated translated language construct of said plurality of translated language constructs.
  • 12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said storing is so as to define a correspondence between a set of said plurality of translated language constructs, each translated language construct of said set comprising a predetermined translation of a common underlying language construct.
  • 13. A machine-readable medium storing executable instructions, which, when executed in a processing system, cause said processing system to perform a method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network, said method comprising: communicating a plurality of predetermined language constructs in a first language to a first entity as a first transmission over said network, the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language displayed to the first entity in a first set of one or more interactive fields, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the first language being associated with a predetermined numerical identifier;receiving, from said first entity, an identifier of a second entity;receiving, from said first entity, a first numerical identifier of a first language construct selected by the first entity from said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language, the first numerical identifier comprising a numerical indicator of the first language construct and not including the text of the first language construct;responsive to receipt of said first numerical identifier, determining a translated language construct corresponding to said first numerical identifier, said determining further comprises:retrieving entity information relating to said second entity based on the identifier of said second entity; andretrieving said translated language construct from a table based on said entity information and said first numerical identifier of the first language construct;communicating said translated language construct to said second entity as a second transmission over said network; andcommunicating the plurality of predetermined language constructs in a second language to the second entity in a second set of one or more interactive fields, the second entity to respond to the first entity by selecting a second language construct from the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the second language, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the second language being associated with the predetermined numerical identifier.
  • 14. The machine readable medium according to claim 13, wherein said entity information further comprises a language preference of said second entity.
  • 15. The machine readable medium according to claim 13, wherein said first language construct is a predetermined question that is asked by said first entity in an electronic commerce transaction over said network.
  • 16. The machine readable medium according to claim 13, wherein said first transmission is a Hyper Text Markup Language (HTTP) message.
  • 17. The machine readable medium according to claim 13, wherein said second transmission is an electronic mail message.
  • 18. The machine readable medium according to claim 13, wherein said identifier of said second entity is an electronic mail address of said second entity.
  • 19. The machine readable medium according to claim 13, wherein said method further comprises, at a network-based transaction facility, storing said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and an associated plurality of translated language constructs so as to define a correspondence between each language construct of said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and at least one associated translated language construct of said plurality of translated language constructs.
  • 20. The machine readable medium according to claim 13, wherein said storing is so as to define a correspondence between a set of said plurality of translated language constructs, each translated language construct of said set comprising a predetermined translation of a common underlying language construct.
  • 21. A hardware system to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network, said system comprising: means for communicating a plurality of predetermined language constructs in a first language to a first entity as a first transmission over said network, the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language displayed to the first entity in a first set of one or more interactive fields, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the first language being associated with a predetermined numerical identifier;means for receiving, from said first entity, an identifier of a second entity;means for receiving, from said first entity, a first numerical identifier of a first language construct selected by the first entity from said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language, the first numerical identifier comprising a numerical indicator of the first language construct and not including the text of the first language construct;means for determining a translated language construct corresponding to said first numerical identifier, said determining responsive to receipt of said first numerical identifier, said determining further comprises:retrieving entity information relating to said second entity based on the identifier of said second entity; andretrieving said translated language construct from a table based on said entity information and said first numerical identifier of the first language construct;means for communicating said translated language construct to said second entity as a second transmission over said network; andmeans for communicating the plurality of predetermined language constructs in a second language to the second entity in a second set of one or more interactive fields, the second entity to respond to the first entity by selecting a second language construct from the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the second language, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the second language being associated with the predetermined numerical identifier.
  • 22. The system according to claim 21, wherein said entity information further comprises a language preference of said second entity.
  • 23. The system according to claim 21, wherein said first language construct is a predetermined question that is asked by said first entity in an electronic commerce transaction over said network.
  • 24. The system according to claim 21, wherein said first transmission is a Hyper Text Markup Language (HTTP) message.
  • 25. The system according to claim 21, wherein said second transmission is an electronic mail message.
  • 26. The system according to claim 21, wherein said identifier of said second entity is an electronic mail address of said second entity.
  • 27. The system according to claim 21, further comprising, at a network-based transaction facility, means for storing said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and an associated plurality of translated language constructs so as to define a correspondence between each language construct of said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and at least one associated translated language construct of said plurality of translated language constructs.
  • 28. The system according to claim 27, wherein said storing is so as to define a correspondence between a set of said plurality of translated language constructs, each translated language construct of said set comprising a predetermined translation of a common underlying language construct.
  • 29. A system to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network, said system comprising: a communications server to communicate a plurality of predetermined language constructs in a first language to a first entity as a first transmission over said network, the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language displayed to the first entity in a first set of one or more interactive fields, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the first language being associated with a predetermined numerical identifier, andreceive, from said first entity, an identifier of a second entity and a first numerical identifier of a first language construct selected by the first entity from said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language, the first numerical identifier comprising a numerical indicator of the first language construct and not including the text of the first language construct; anda processing server to determine a translated language construct corresponding to said first numerical identifier, said processing server to determine responsive to a receipt of said first numerical identifier, said processing server to determine the translated language construct further comprises: said processing server to retrieve entity information relating to said second entity based on the identifier of said second entity,said processing server to retrieve said translated language construct from a table based on said entity information and said first numerical identifier of the first language construct;said communication server further to communicate said translated language construct and the plurality of predetermined language constructs in a second language in a second set of one or more interactive fields to said second entity as a second transmission over said network, the second entity to respond to the first entity by selecting a second language construct from the plurality of predetermined language constructs in the second language, each predetermined language construct of the plurality of language constructs in the second language being associated with the predetermined numerical identifier.
  • 30. The system according to claim 29, wherein said entity information further comprises a language preference of said second entity.
  • 31. The system according to claim 29, wherein said first language construct is a predetermined question that is asked by said first entity in an electronic commerce transaction over said network.
  • 32. The system according to claim 29, wherein said first transmission is a Hyper Text Markup Language (HTTP) message.
  • 33. The system according to claim 29, wherein said second transmission is an electronic mail message.
  • 34. The system according to claim 29, wherein said identifier of said second entity is an electronic mail address of said second entity.
  • 35. The system according to claim 29, wherein, at a network-based transaction facility, said processing server further stores said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and an associated plurality of translated language constructs so as to define a correspondence between each language construct of said plurality of predetermined language constructs in the first language and at least one associated translated language construct of said plurality of translated language constructs.
  • 36. The system according to claim 35, wherein said storing by said processing server is so as to define a correspondence between a set of said plurality of translated language constructs, each translated language construct of said set comprising a predetermined translation of a common underlying language construct.
US Referenced Citations (188)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymayer May 1971 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4864516 Gathier et al. Sep 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5063523 Vrenjak Nov 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5418949 Suzuki May 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5442782 Malatesta et al. Aug 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5497319 Chong et al. Mar 1996 A
5535403 Li et al. Jul 1996 A
5544051 Senn et al. Aug 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5600833 Senn et al. Feb 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5652896 Yamauchi et al. Jul 1997 A
5657389 Houvener Aug 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5724524 Hunt et al. Mar 1998 A
5724593 Hargrave, III et al. Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5758126 Daniels et al. May 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5778213 Shakib et al. Jul 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5835911 Nakagawa et al. Nov 1998 A
5845265 Woolston Dec 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5846265 McGregor et al. Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5854997 Sukeda et al. Dec 1998 A
5857188 Douglas Jan 1999 A
5857201 Write, Jr. et al. Jan 1999 A
5857203 Kauffman et al. Jan 1999 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5884247 Christy Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5905974 Fraser et al. May 1999 A
5905975 Aussubel May 1999 A
5909544 Anderson et al. Jun 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5944790 Levy Aug 1999 A
5874412 Hazelhurst et al. Oct 1999 A
5966685 Flanagan et al. Oct 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
6006221 Liddy et al. Dec 1999 A
6018742 Herbert, III Jan 2000 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058379 Odom et al. May 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6085169 Walker et al. Jul 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6092035 Kurachi et al. Jul 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6119229 Martinez et al. Sep 2000 A
6134533 Shell Oct 2000 A
6141653 Conklin et al. Oct 2000 A
6144984 DeBenedictis et al. Nov 2000 A
6151589 Aggarwal et al. Nov 2000 A
6161082 Goldberg et al. Dec 2000 A
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6205418 Li et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226412 Schwab May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266651 Woolston Jul 2001 B1
6266652 Godin et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275789 Moser et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282507 Horiguchi et al. Aug 2001 B1
6292769 Flanagan et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301554 Christy Oct 2001 B1
6317727 May Nov 2001 B1
6326985 Tazoe et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336105 Conklin et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339755 Hetherington et al. Jan 2002 B1
6349275 Schumacher et al. Feb 2002 B1
6363337 Amith Mar 2002 B1
6389427 Faulkner May 2002 B1
6396515 Hetherington et al. May 2002 B1
6415270 Rackson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421653 May Jul 2002 B1
6446048 Wells et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460015 Hetherington et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463404 Appleby Oct 2002 B1
6473729 Gastaldo et al. Oct 2002 B1
6493661 White et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507813 Veditz et al. Jan 2003 B2
6526426 Lakritz Feb 2003 B1
6567821 Polk May 2003 B1
6570591 Crovetto et al. May 2003 B1
6571241 Nosohara May 2003 B1
6574239 Dowling et al. Jun 2003 B1
6598026 Ojha et al. Jul 2003 B1
6623529 Lakritz Sep 2003 B1
6647373 Carlton-Foss Nov 2003 B1
6721715 Nemzow Apr 2004 B2
6732161 Hess et al. May 2004 B1
6771291 DiStefano Aug 2004 B1
6799165 Boesjes Sep 2004 B1
6857022 Scanlan Feb 2005 B1
6901408 Fachat et al. May 2005 B2
6999932 Zhou Feb 2006 B1
7007026 Wilkinson et al. Feb 2006 B2
7013289 Horn et al. Mar 2006 B2
7076453 Jammes et al. Jul 2006 B2
7133835 Fusz et al. Nov 2006 B1
7136863 Wang Nov 2006 B2
7165041 Guheen et al. Jan 2007 B1
7191393 Chin et al. Mar 2007 B1
7234110 Sumitomo Jun 2007 B2
7315826 Guheen et al. Jan 2008 B1
7340389 Vargas Mar 2008 B2
7418390 Jokipii Aug 2008 B1
20010011241 Nemzow Aug 2001 A1
20010029455 Chin et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010039531 Aoki Nov 2001 A1
20020029182 Nakagawa Mar 2002 A1
20020042835 Pepin et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046137 Odom et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020073111 Heyliger Jun 2002 A1
20020082953 Batham et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082977 Hammond et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099562 Bruce et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020123959 Mozley et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030005159 Kumhyr Jan 2003 A1
20030018885 Landsman et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030055747 Carr et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030083952 Simpson et al. May 2003 A1
20030110047 Santosuosso et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030139975 Perkowski Jul 2003 A1
20030154134 Wang Aug 2003 A1
20030167213 Jammes et al. Sep 2003 A1
20050102151 Fuwa et al. May 2005 A1
20050240392 Munro et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060200353 Bennett Sep 2006 A1
20070112643 Veres et al. May 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
2253543 Mar 1997 CA
1139782 Jan 1997 CN
2658635 Feb 1991 FR
02207898 Jul 2002 JP
04-094643 Mar 2004 JP
9300266 Feb 1993 NL
WO 9215174 Feb 1992 WO
WO9517711 Jun 1995 WO
WO 9634356 Apr 1996 WO
WO 9737315 Mar 1997 WO
WO9963461 Dec 1999 WO
WO-0058862 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0157722 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0182115 Nov 2001 WO
WO-03038560 May 2003 WO
WO-03038560 May 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030074462 A1 Apr 2003 US