System and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8639829
  • Patent Number
    8,639,829
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 19, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 28, 2014
    11 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Dennison; Jerry
    Agents
    • Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Abstract
A system and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network are described. Multiple predetermined language constructs are communicated to a first entity as a first transmission over the network. Responsive to selection by the first entity of a language construct from the predetermined language constructs, a translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct is identified. Finally, the translated language construct is communicated to a second entity as a second transmission over the network.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of network-based communications and, more specifically, to a system and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network, such as the Internet.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The explosive growth of the Internet as a publication and interactive communication platform has created an electronic environment that is changing the way business is transacted. As the Internet becomes increasingly accessible around the world, communications between users that utilize different spoken or written languages increase exponentially.


Several attempts have been made to facilitate such communications and to provide translation software packages residing on a computer and configured to translate text or voice communications from one language to another. Some of these translation software packages, however, can be expensive and can result in a financial burden for a user of such software packages. Furthermore, such software packages require considerable storage capacity to be available on the computer.


Another drawback of the translation software packages relates to their limited applicability. For example, current technology allows for translation of text through common text translation software installed on a computer. The translation may be accomplished in a variety of ways, one of which is direct word for word translation of the communication, which is imperfect and produces grammatically incorrect sentences in the translated language. Current technology also allows for limited translation of voice communications through speech recognition software installed on the computer. However, spoken language translation is mostly available in restricted domains, where the database of recognizable words is limited to a specific set of words.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A system and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network are described. Multiple predetermined language constructs are communicated to a first entity as a first transmission over the network. Responsive to selection by the first entity of a language construct from the predetermined language constructs, a translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct is identified. Finally, the translated language construct is communicated to a second entity as a second transmission over the network.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings, and from the detailed description, which follows below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not intended to be limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary network-based transaction facility in the form of a network-based auction facility.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary database, maintained by and accessed via a database engine server, which at least partially implements and supports the auction facility.



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary stored constructs table.



FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary stored translated constructs table.



FIG. 4 is an interaction diagram illustrating a sequence of interactions, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary environment in which the interaction sequence illustrated in FIG. 4 may be employed.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network.



FIG. 7 is a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the exemplary form of a computer system within which a set of instructions may be executed.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A system and method to facilitate translation of communication between entities over a network are described. In the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, electrical, functional, and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary network-based transaction facility in the form of a network-based auction facility 10. While an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is described within the context of an auction facility, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention will find application in many different types of computer-based, and network-based, commerce facilities.


The auction facility 10 includes one or more of a number of types of front-end servers, namely communications servers in the exemplary form of page servers 12 that deliver web pages to multiple entities (e.g., markup language documents), picture servers 14 that dynamically deliver images to be displayed within the web pages, listing servers 16, processing servers in the exemplary form of Common Gateway Interface (CGI) or Internet Server Application Program Interface (ISAPI) servers 18 that provide an intelligent interface to the back-end of the auction facility 10, and search servers 20 that handle search requests to the auction facility 10. In addition, the auction facility 10 includes e-mail servers 21 that provide, inter alia, automated e-mail communications to/from entities of the facility 10.


The auction facility 10 further includes one or more back-end servers, for example a database engine server 22, a search indexer server 24 and a credit card database server 26, each of which maintains and facilitates access to a respective database 23. The network-based auction facility 10, such as an Internet-based auction facility 10, may be accessed by a client program 30, such as a browser (e.g., the Internet Explorer browser distributed by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.) that executes on a client machine 32 and accesses the facility 10 via a network 34, such as, for example, the Internet. Other examples of networks that a client may utilize to access the auction facility 10 includes a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a wireless network (e.g., a cellular network), or the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) network.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary database 23, maintained by and accessed via the database engine server 22, which at least partially implements and supports the auction facility 10. The database 23 may, in one embodiment, be implemented as a relational database, and includes a number of tables having entries, or records, that are linked by indices and keys. In an alternative embodiment, the database 23 may be implemented as a collection of objects in an object-oriented database.


Central to the database 23 shown in FIG. 2 is a user table 40, which contains a record for each entity or user of the auction facility 10. Each user may operate as a seller, a buyer, or both, within the auction facility 10. The database 23 also includes items tables 42 that may be linked to the user table 40. Specifically, the table 42 includes a seller items table 44 and a bidder items table 46. A user record in the user table 40 may be linked to multiple items that are being, or have been, auctioned via the auction facility 10. A link indicates whether the user is a seller or a bidder (or buyer) with respect to items for which records exist within the items table 42.


The database 23 further includes a note table 48 populated with note records that may be linked to one or more item records within the items table 42 and/or to one or more user records within the user table 40. Each note record within the note table 48 may include, inter alia, a comment, description, history, or other information pertaining to an item being auctioned via the auction facility 10, or pertaining to a user of the auction facility 10.


A number of other tables are also shown to be linked to the user table 40, such as a user past aliases table 50, a feedback table 52, a bids table 54, an accounts table 56, and an account balances table 58.


The database 23 is also shown to include two tables specifically to enable an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. A stored construct table 60 stores a predetermined number of language constructs, such as sentences, phrases, questions, or any other known types of language constructs. A stored translated construct table 70 contains a number of records, each record storing translated language constructs corresponding to the language constructs stored in table 60. Prior to any communication between client 32 and the network-based auction facility 10, each translated language construct is generated and stored in the stored translated construct table 70, and the correspondence to one or more predetermined language constructs in the stored language constructs table 60 is defined, such that each translated language construct includes a predetermined translation of the corresponding predetermined language construct.



FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a stored construct table 60. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, the table 60 includes a construct ID field 62 to store a unique identifier for each stored language construct to be used in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The table 60 further includes a construct field 64 to store each language construct maintained within the database 23.



FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a stored translated construct table 70. As illustrated in FIG. 3B, the table 70 includes a construct ID field 72 to store a unique identifier for each translated language construct, which corresponds to the identifier of the language construct stored within field 62. The table 70 further includes a language ID field 74 to store an identifier for a language pertaining to the translated construct, and a translated construct field 76 to store the translated construct in the particular language identified in the language ID field 74.



FIG. 4 is an interaction diagram illustrating a sequence 90 of interactions, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities in the exemplary form of a first user 92 and a second user 94. While the sequence 90 describes a client-server environment, whereby communications between the first and second users 92 and 94 are facilitated by, or performed through, a website 96, it will also be appreciated that the teachings of the present inventions may be applied to a peer-to-peer environment, whereby the users 92 and 94 communicate directly and not through the website 96.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, the sequence 90 commences at block 105 with the selection by the first user 92 of a language construct and of a user identifier of the second user 94. The language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from a drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs, the drop-down list being displayed in a first interactive area of a web form communicated to the first user 92 from the website 96. Alternatively, the language construct may be selected from a window, which presents the web form containing the predetermined language constructs to the first user 92. The predetermined language constructs are generated and stored in the stored constructs table 60 of the database 23 prior to being communicated to the first user 92 in the drop-down list or web form.


At block 110, the language construct is communicated from the first user 92 to the website 96 via the network 34 in a message directed to the second user 94, for example an electronic mail (e-mail) message.


At block 115, the website 96 (e.g., the auction facility 10) utilizes the search servers 20 to conduct a search of the user table 40, the stored constructs table 60, and the stored translated constructs table 70 to retrieve a translated language construct, based on the user identifier corresponding to the second user 94. The search of the user table 40 locates the user information pertaining to the second user 94, including a language preference of the second user 94, and the search of the tables 60 and 70 locates the translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct and the language preference of the second user 94. In one embodiment, the predetermined language constructs and the translated language constructs are generated and stored in respective tables 60 and 70 prior to the language constructs being communicated to the first user 92, so as to define a correspondence between each predetermined language construct and at least one associated translated language construct. Alternatively, the storing is so as to define a correspondence between a set of the translated language constructs, wherein each translated language construct of the set includes a predetermined translation of a common underlying language construct.


At block 120, the website 96 generates a translated message to be transmitted to the second user 94. In one embodiment, the translated message is an e-mail message generated by the e-mail servers 21 and directed to the second user 94, which contains the translated language construct. Alternatively, the translated e-mail message may contain multiple interactive fields to allow the second user 94 to respond to the first user 92.


At block 125, the translated message is communicated to the second user 94. In one embodiment, an e-mail message containing the translated language construct is communicated by the e-mail servers 21 to the second user 94.


At block 130, the second user 94 selects a further language construct and a user identifier of the first user 92 to which the further language construct is to be communicated. The further language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from a drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs translated in the language preference of the second user 94, the drop-down list being displayed in one interactive field of the multiple fields communicated to the second user 94 from the website 96. Alternatively, the second user 94 may only receive the translated message from the website 96 and take no further action.


At block 135, the further language construct is communicated from the second user 94 to the website 96 via the network 34 in a reply message directed to the first user 92, for example an electronic mail (e-mail) message.


At block 140, the website 96 (e.g., the auction facility 10) utilizes the search servers 20 to conduct a search of the user table 40, the stored constructs table 60, and the stored translated constructs table 70 to retrieve a translated further language construct, based on the user identifier corresponding to the first user 92. The search of the user table 40 locates the user information pertaining to the first user 92, including a language preference of the first user 92, and the search of the tables 60 and 70 locates the translated further language construct corresponding to the selected further language construct and the language preference of the first user 92.


At block 145, the website 96 generates a translated reply message to be transmitted to the first user 92. In one embodiment, the translated reply message is an e-mail message generated by the e-mail servers 21 and directed to the first user 92, which contains the translated further language construct.


At block 150, the translated reply message is communicated to the first user 92. In one embodiment, an e-mail message containing the translated further language construct is communicated by the e-mail servers 21 to the first user 92.


It should be noted that the sequence 90 may have any one of a number of applications and may be implemented within any number of environments. For example, the sequence 90 may be used to communicate information from any one entity, such as first or second users 92 and 94, to the website 96 in a language preferred by the respective entity. The website 96 may subsequently translate the information and use it in any one of a number of applications, such as in the preparation of item listings, or in the updating of the user information.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary environment in which the interaction sequence 90 may be employed. As illustrated in FIG. 5, client machines 32 are shown to reside outside the context of a website, such as the exemplary website 96 shown in FIG. 4. Accordingly, this embodiment describes an application which allows a first user of a client machine 32, such as the first client machine 32, to communicate language constructs to a second user of a further client machine 32, such as the second client machine 32, both of which reside outside the website 96 or any other commerce facility. Alternatively, each user of the client machines 32 may only communicate language constructs to the website 96 in order to request performance of applications by the website 96.


Referring to FIG. 5, the first user selects a language construct and a user identifier of the second user in an e-mail client or browser 322 that executes in the first client machine 32, the second user being the recipient of an e-mail message 324 containing the language construct to be communicated by the first user. The language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from a drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs, the drop-down list being displayed in a first interactive area of a web form communicated to the first user from the website 96. Alternatively, the language construct may be selected from a window, which presents the web form containing the predetermined language constructs to the first user.


The message is shown to be communicated to the e-mail servers 21 of the website 96. Specifically, the message containing the language construct may be communicated, in one embodiment, as an e-mail message or by utilizing any other transfer protocol or communication. The e-mail servers 21 receive the message using the transmission functions 217 and proceed to parse the message to extract the language construct and the user identifier for the second user that operates the second client machine 32.


The search servers 20 within the website 96 receive the language construct and the user identifier and search tables within corresponding databases using search functions 205 to provide a translated language construct to be communicated to the second user. Specifically, in one embodiment, the search servers 20 search the user table 40 shown in FIG. 2 to locate user information pertaining to the second user, including a language preference of the second user. The search servers 20 further search the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 shown in FIG. 2 to locate the translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct and the language preference of the second user.


The translated language construct is subsequently communicated to the e-mail servers 21. The e-mail servers 21 generate a translated e-mail message containing the translated language construct using message generation functions 215. The translated e-mail message is then communicated to the second client machine via the transmission functions 217.


In one embodiment, the second user selects a further language construct and a user identifier of the first user in an e-mail client or browser 326 that executes in the second client machine 32, the first user being the recipient of a reply e-mail message 328 containing the further language construct to be communicated by the second user. The language construct may be selected, in one embodiment, from a drop-down list containing multiple predetermined language constructs translated in the language preference of the second user, the drop-down list being displayed in one interactive field of multiple interactive fields that may be communicated to the second user from the website 96. Alternatively, the second user may only receive the translated e-mail message and take no further action.


The reply message is shown to be communicated to the e-mail servers 21 of the website 96. Specifically, the reply message containing the further language construct may be communicated, in one embodiment, as an email message or by utilizing any other transfer protocol or communication. The e-mail servers 21 receive the reply message using the transmission functions 217 and proceed to parse the reply message to extract the further language construct and the user identifier for the first user that operates the first client machine 32.


The search servers 20 within the website 96 receive the further language construct and the user identifier and search tables within corresponding databases using search functions 205 to provide a translated further language construct to be communicated to the first user. Specifically, in one embodiment, the search servers 20 search the user table 40 shown in FIG. 2 to locate user information pertaining to the first user, including a language preference of the first user. The search servers 20 further search the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 shown in FIG. 2 to locate the translated further language construct corresponding to the selected further language construct and the language preference of the first user.


The translated further language construct is subsequently communicated to the e-mail servers 21. The e-mail servers 21 generate a translated reply message containing the translated further language construct using message generation functions 215. The translated reply message is then communicated to the first client machine via the transmission functions 217.


An alternative application would allow each user of the first or second client machines 32 to communicate selected language constructs to the website 96. In this case, the website 96 may perform search and translation operations and use the translated language construct to update listings via listing servers 16, or to update user information in the user table 40.



FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network. It will be appreciated that the method may, as described above, be utilized to facilitate translation of communications, and is not limited to the context of a network-based auction facility.


As illustrated in FIG. 6, at processing block 610, a web form containing language constructs is communicated to the first user. At processing block 615, a selected language construct and a user identifier of the second user are received from the first user.


At processing block 620, the user table 40 is searched to locate user information pertaining to the second user, including a language preference of the second user. At processing block 625, the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 are searched to retrieve a translated language construct corresponding to the selected language construct.


At processing block 630, a translated message containing the translated language construct and multiple interactive fields is generated. At processing block 635, the translated message is communicated to the second user.


At processing block 640, a further language construct and a user identifier of the first user are received from the second user. At processing block 645, the user table 40 is searched to locate user information pertaining to the first user, including a language preference of the first user. At processing block 650, the stored constructs table 60 and the stored translated constructs table 70 are searched to retrieve a translated further language construct corresponding to the selected further language construct.


At processing block 655, a translated reply message containing the translated further language construct is generated. Finally, at processing block 660, the translated reply message is communicated to the first user.



FIG. 7 shows a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the exemplary form of a computer system 300 within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one of the methodologies discussed above, may be executed. In alternative embodiments, the machine may comprise a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance or any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify actions to be taken by that machine.


The computer system 300 includes a processor 302, a main memory 304 and a static memory 306, which communicate with each other via a bus 308. The computer system 300 may further include a video display unit 310 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 300 also includes an alphanumeric input device 312 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 314 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 316, a signal generation device 18 (e.g., a speaker), and a network interface device 320.


The disk drive unit 316 includes a machine-readable medium 324 on which is stored a set of instructions (i.e., software) 326 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described above. The software 326 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 304 and/or within the processor 302. The software 326 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 320.


It is to be understood that embodiments of this invention may be used as or to support software programs executed upon some form of processing core (such as the CPU of a computer) or otherwise implemented or realized upon or within a machine or computer readable medium. A machine readable medium includes any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer). For example, a machine readable medium includes read-only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.); or any other type of media suitable for storing or transmitting information.


In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a communications server to: receive a first language construct in a first language from a first entity,identify a first numerical identifier associated with the first language construct; anda processing server to: identify a language identifier from a user table of a network-based transaction facility, the language identifier associated with a second entity, the second entity being a user of the network-based transaction facility, the user table containing user information about the second entity, andretrieve a second language construct based on the first numerical identifier and the language identifier associated with the second entity, the second language construct being a translation of the first language construct in a second language, the language identifier corresponding to the second language.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the communications server is further to transmit the second language construct to the second entity.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the communications server is further to receive an identifier of the second entity from the first entity.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the identifier of the second entity comprises an electronic mail address.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the first language construct comprises a selected language construct being one of a plurality of language constructs in the first language transmitted to the first entity.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the processing server is further to retrieve a plurality of language constructs in the second language and the communications server is further to transmit the plurality of language constructs in the second language to the second entity.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the communications server is to transmit the plurality of language constructs in the second language to the second entity with the second language construct.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the first language construct forms a portion of a message formatted in a hypertext markup language.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the first language construct forms a portion of an electronic mail message.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the first entity comprises the network-based transaction facility.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the first entity comprises a client machine.
  • 12. A method comprising: receiving a first language construct in a first language from a first entity;determining, using one or more processors, a numerical identifier corresponding to the first language construct;identifying a language identifier from a user table of a network-based transaction facility, the language identifier associated with a second entity, the second entity being a user of the network-based transaction facility, the user table containing user information about the second entity;selecting a second language construct from a plurality of language constructs based on the numerical identifier and the language identifier of the second entity; andtransmitting the second language construct to the second entity, the second language construct being a translation of the first language construct in a second language, the language identifier corresponding to the second language.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising receiving an identifier of the second entity from the first entity.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, further comprising: transmitting a plurality of language constructs in the first language to the first entity, and wherein the first language construct comprises a selected language construct from the plurality of language constructs.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, further comprising: retrieving a plurality of language constructs in the second language; andtransmitting the plurality of language constructs in the second language to the second entity.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising: transmitting the plurality of language constructs in the second language to the second entity with the second language construct.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions embodied thereon, the instructions executable by a processor for performing a method comprising: receiving a first language construct in a first language from a first entity;determining a numerical identifier corresponding to the first language construct;identifying a language identifier from a user table of a network-based transaction facility, the language identifier associated with a second entity, the second entity being a user of the network-based transaction facility, the user table containing user information about the second entity;selecting a second language construct from a plurality of language constructs based on the numerical identifier and the language identifier of the second entity; andtransmitting the second language construct to the second entity, the second language construct being a translation of the first language construct in a second language, the language identifier corresponding to the second language.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the first language construct forms a portion of a hyper text markup language message.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the first entity comprises the network-based transaction facility.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the first entity comprises a client machine.
  • 21. The system of claim 1, wherein the processing server is to retrieve the second language construct based on the first numerical identifier by determining the second language construct having a second numerical identifier that corresponds to the first numerical identifier.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/976,301, filed Oct. 11, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,752,266 entitled “System and Method to Facilitate Translation of Communications Between Entities Over a Network,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (268)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymeyer May 1971 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4864516 Gaither et al. Sep 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5063523 Vrenjak Nov 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5349368 Takeda et al. Sep 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5384701 Stentiford et al. Jan 1995 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5418949 Suzuki May 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5434978 Dockter et al. Jul 1995 A
5442546 Kaji et al. Aug 1995 A
5442782 Malatesta et al. Aug 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5497319 Chong et al. Mar 1996 A
5535403 Li et al. Jul 1996 A
5544051 Senn et al. Aug 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
5592668 Harding et al. Jan 1997 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5600833 Senn et al. Feb 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5652896 Yamauchi et al. Jul 1997 A
5657389 Houvener Aug 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5696909 Wallner Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5724524 Hunt et al. Mar 1998 A
5724593 Hargrave et al. Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5758126 Daniels et al. May 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5778213 Shakib et al. Jul 1998 A
5778356 Heiny Jul 1998 A
5787386 Kaplan et al. Jul 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5835911 Nakagawa et al. Nov 1998 A
5845143 Yamauchi et al. Dec 1998 A
5845265 Woolston Dec 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5846265 McGregor et al. Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5854997 Sukeda et al. Dec 1998 A
5857188 Douglas Jan 1999 A
5857201 Wright et al. Jan 1999 A
5857203 Kauffman et al. Jan 1999 A
5870722 Albert et al. Feb 1999 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5874412 Priebe et al. Feb 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5884246 Boucher et al. Mar 1999 A
5884247 Christy Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5905974 Fraser et al. May 1999 A
5905975 Ausubel May 1999 A
5909544 Anderson et al. Jun 1999 A
5917484 Mullaney Jun 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5944790 Levy Aug 1999 A
5960382 Steiner Sep 1999 A
5966685 Flanagan et al. Oct 1999 A
5974412 Hazlehurst et al. Oct 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
6006221 Liddy et al. Dec 1999 A
6018742 Herbert, III Jan 2000 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058379 Odom et al. May 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6069939 Fung et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6077085 Parry et al. Jun 2000 A
6085169 Walker et al. Jul 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6092035 Kurachi et al. Jul 2000 A
6092037 Stone et al. Jul 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6119229 Martinez et al. Sep 2000 A
6122606 Johnson Sep 2000 A
6134533 Shell Oct 2000 A
6141653 Conklin et al. Oct 2000 A
6144984 DeBenedictis et al. Nov 2000 A
6151589 Aggarwal et al. Nov 2000 A
6161082 Goldberg et al. Dec 2000 A
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6205418 Li et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226412 Schwab May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266651 Woolston Jul 2001 B1
6266652 Godin et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275789 Moser et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278969 King et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282507 Horiguchi et al. Aug 2001 B1
6292769 Flanagan et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301554 Christy Oct 2001 B1
6308172 Agrawal et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317727 May Nov 2001 B1
6326985 Tazoe et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336105 Conklin et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339755 Hetherington et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341958 Zilberman Jan 2002 B1
6349275 Schumacher et al. Feb 2002 B1
6356865 Franz et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363337 Amith Mar 2002 B1
6389427 Faulkner May 2002 B1
6396515 Hetherington et al. May 2002 B1
6415270 Rackson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421653 May Jul 2002 B1
6438524 Shi Aug 2002 B1
6446048 Wells et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460015 Hetherington et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463404 Appleby Oct 2002 B1
6473729 Gastaldo et al. Oct 2002 B1
6493661 White et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496793 Veditz et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507813 Veditz et al. Jan 2003 B2
6523000 Ando et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526426 Lakritz Feb 2003 B1
6532444 Weber Mar 2003 B1
6567821 Polk May 2003 B1
6570591 Crovetto et al. May 2003 B1
6571241 Nosohara May 2003 B1
6574239 Dowling et al. Jun 2003 B1
6598026 Ojha et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604107 Wang Aug 2003 B1
6616703 Nakagawa Sep 2003 B1
6623529 Lakritz Sep 2003 B1
6647364 Yumura et al. Nov 2003 B1
6647373 Carlton-Foss Nov 2003 B1
6651220 Penteroudakis et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665676 Twig et al. Dec 2003 B2
H2098 Morin Mar 2004 H
6721715 Nemzow Apr 2004 B2
6732161 Hess et al. May 2004 B1
6771291 DiStefano Aug 2004 B1
6799165 Boesjes Sep 2004 B1
6857022 Scanlan Feb 2005 B1
6901408 Fachat et al. May 2005 B2
6912539 Kapitanski et al. Jun 2005 B1
6965882 Lapstun et al. Nov 2005 B1
6999932 Zhou Feb 2006 B1
7007026 Wilkinson et al. Feb 2006 B2
7013289 Horn et al. Mar 2006 B2
7031985 Pecheny Apr 2006 B1
7072826 Wakita Jul 2006 B1
7076453 Jammes et al. Jul 2006 B2
7133835 Fusz et al. Nov 2006 B1
7136863 Wang Nov 2006 B2
7165041 Guheen et al. Jan 2007 B1
7191393 Chin et al. Mar 2007 B1
7194403 Okura et al. Mar 2007 B2
7234110 Sumitomo Jun 2007 B2
7251612 Parker et al. Jul 2007 B1
7315613 Kleindienst et al. Jan 2008 B2
7315826 Guheen et al. Jan 2008 B1
7337133 Bezos et al. Feb 2008 B1
7340389 Vargas Mar 2008 B2
7418390 Jokipii Aug 2008 B1
7660740 Boone et al. Feb 2010 B2
7752034 Brockett et al. Jul 2010 B2
7752266 Grove Jul 2010 B2
7895082 Veres et al. Feb 2011 B2
7908132 Brockett et al. Mar 2011 B2
7941348 Veres et al. May 2011 B2
8050957 Woehler Nov 2011 B2
8078505 Veres et al. Dec 2011 B2
8255286 Veres et al. Aug 2012 B2
8266016 Boone et al. Sep 2012 B2
8442871 Veres et al. May 2013 B2
20010011241 Nemzow Aug 2001 A1
20010029442 Shiotsu et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010029455 Chin et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010039531 Aoki Nov 2001 A1
20010049707 Tran Dec 2001 A1
20020029182 Nakagawa Mar 2002 A1
20020035466 Kodama Mar 2002 A1
20020042835 Pepin et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046137 Odom et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020069049 Turner Jun 2002 A1
20020073111 Heyliger Jun 2002 A1
20020082953 Batham et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082977 Hammond et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099562 Bruce et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116318 Thomas et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123959 Mozley et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020174010 Rice, III Nov 2002 A1
20020184610 Chong et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188670 Stringham Dec 2002 A1
20020193986 Schirris Dec 2002 A1
20020198713 Franz et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005159 Kumhyr Jan 2003 A1
20030018885 Landsman et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030033137 Holubar et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046059 Litster et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055747 Carr et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030074462 Grove Apr 2003 A1
20030078033 Sauer et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083952 Simpson et al. May 2003 A1
20030084051 Depura et al. May 2003 A1
20030088566 Wang May 2003 A1
20030093326 Poon et al. May 2003 A1
20030110047 Santosuosso et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030139975 Perkowski Jul 2003 A1
20030154134 Wang Aug 2003 A1
20030167213 Jammes et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030229545 Veres et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229554 Veres et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001106 Deutscher et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040073507 Scott et al. Apr 2004 A1
20050102151 Fuwa et al. May 2005 A1
20050240392 Munro et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060074792 Wagoner et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060200353 Bennett Sep 2006 A1
20070112643 Veres et al. May 2007 A1
20080152095 Kleindienst et al. Jun 2008 A1
20100131510 Boone et al. May 2010 A1
20100228536 Grove Sep 2010 A1
20110231530 Veres et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120047029 Veres et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120246233 Veres et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120284304 Boone et al. Nov 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
2253543 Mar 1997 CA
1139782 Jan 1997 CN
2658635 Aug 1991 FR
2000322490 Nov 2000 JP
2001000469 Jan 2001 JP
2002207898 Jul 2002 JP
2004094643 Mar 2004 JP
9300266 Feb 1993 NL
WO-9215174 Sep 1992 WO
WO-9517711 Jun 1995 WO
WO-9634356 Oct 1996 WO
WO-9737315 Oct 1997 WO
WO-9963461 Dec 1999 WO
WO-0058862 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0102926 Jan 2001 WO
WO-0157722 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0182115 Nov 2001 WO
WO-03038560 May 2003 WO
WO-03104931 Dec 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (336)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Advisory Action mailed Feb. 22, 2010, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Advisory Action mailed May 26, 2006, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Amendment filed Apr. 28, 2008, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Appeal Brief filed Apr. 26, 2010, 37 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Appeal Brief filed Dec. 15, 2006, 34 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Appeal Decision mailed Feb. 28, 2008, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief mailed Aug. 15, 2006, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Jun. 11, 2010, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 8, 2006, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2004, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2008, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2005, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 25, 2009, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 21, 2004, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2005, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2009, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2008, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Jun. 27, 2006, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Reply Brief filed May 7, 2007, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Reply Brief filed Aug. 11, 2010, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed Jan. 3, 2005 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2004, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed Jan. 23, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2005, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed Jan. 25, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 25, 2009, 22 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed Feb. 17, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2008, 21 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed May 8, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 8, 2006, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed May 21, 2004 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 21, 2004, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed Jul. 20, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2009, 21 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed Aug. 4, 2005 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2005, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Response filed Oct. 21, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2008, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Advisory Action mailed May 2, 2008, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2008, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2009, 25 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2008, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 18, 2009, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Mar. 27, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2008, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Jun. 5, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2009, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Jun. 10, 2008 to Advisory Action mailed May 2, 2008, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Sep. 25, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2007, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Nov. 24, 2008 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2008, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2006, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2007, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2005, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2004, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2006, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Mar. 19, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2006, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Apr. 12, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2005, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Apr. 13, 2005 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2004, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,525, Response filed Sep. 22, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2006, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 9, 2008, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 13, 2009, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 30, 2005, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 30, 2006, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief mailed Jul. 29, 2008, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Sep. 9, 2009, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 17, 2008, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2009, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2005, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2006, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2007, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2007, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2004, 31 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2005, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2008, 23 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 2, 2009, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Jun. 16, 2008, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Mar. 23, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2008, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Apr. 6, 2005 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2004, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed May 16, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2005, 24 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed May 19, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 17, 2008, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Jun. 7, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2007, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Aug. 4, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2009, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Sep. 13, 2005 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2005, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Sep. 29, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 17, 2008, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Oct. 13, 2005 to Advisory Action mailed Sep. 30, 2005, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Oct. 24, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2006, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Dec. 13, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2007, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Dec. 20, 2006 to Advisory Action mailed Nov. 30, 2006, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, Response filed Sep. 4, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2009, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 4, 2009, 22 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Apr. 29, 2009, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2008, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2006, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2008, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2007, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2006, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2007, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Response filed May 3, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 3, 2006, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Response filed Jun. 25, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2007, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Response filed Jul. 28, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2008, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Response filed Oct. 27, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2006, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Response filed Dec. 20, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2007, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Response filed Dec. 29, 2005 to Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 31, 2005, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 31, 2005, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 10, 2007, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Advisory Action mailed Mar. 29, 2010, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Advisory Action mailed May 1, 2008, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Advisory Action mailed Dec. 12, 2008, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Appeal Brief filed Mar. 11, 2009, 27 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief mailed Feb. 11, 2009, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief mailed May 12, 2008, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2010, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 11, 2008, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2008, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2006, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 21, 2006, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 11, 2007, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2009, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 10, 2010, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Jan. 5, 2009, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Apr. 7, 2010, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Apr. 10, 2008, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Mar. 8, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2010, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Mar. 27, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 11, 2008, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Jun. 12, 2008 to Advisory Action mailed May 1, 2008, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Jun. 12, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 11, 2008, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Jun. 21, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 21, 2006, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Sep. 28, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2009, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Oct. 11, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 11, 2007, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Nov. 4, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2008, 22 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Dec. 6, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2006, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Appeal Brief filed Dec. 15, 2009, 23 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Mar. 31, 2010, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2009, 27 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 21, 2008, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Aug. 3, 2009, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Response filed Jul. 21, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 21, 2008, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Response filed Dec. 23, 2008 to Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 24, 2008, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Restriction Requirement mailed Nov. 24, 2008, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2007, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Non Final Office Action mailed May 15, 2007, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Advisory Action mailed Mar. 13, 2007, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Advisory Action mailed Sep. 2, 2009, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Advisory Action mailed Oct. 4, 2010, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Advisory Action mailed Oct. 6, 2009, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 26, 2008, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Mar. 19, 2008, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Mar. 31, 2009, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Jul. 11, 2008, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2010, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Final Office Action mailed May 29, 2008, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2009, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2008, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2006, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 18, 2006, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2008, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 10, 2009, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2009, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Feb. 12, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2009, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Feb. 22, 2007 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2006, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Apr. 14, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2008, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed May 11, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 10, 2009, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Jul. 31, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed May 29, 2008, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Aug. 13, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed May 15, 2007, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Aug. 18, 2009 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2009, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Sep. 18, 2009 to Advisory Action mailed Sep. 2, 2009, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Sep. 23, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2010, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Oct. 5, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 18, 2006, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Oct. 19, 2009 to Advisory Action mailed Oct. 6, 2009, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Nov. 11, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2008, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Nov. 26, 2007 to Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2007, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Response filed Dec. 2, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2008, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421 , Response filed Nov. 29, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2010, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 13, 2008, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2009, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2010, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 12, 2009, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2010, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2007, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response filed Jan. 11, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2009, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response filed Feb. 28, 2008 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2007, 23 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response filed Apr. 13, 2009 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 12, 2009, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response filed Jul. 6, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 5, 2010, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response filed Oct. 10, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 13, 2008, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,728, Examiner Interview Summary, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,728, Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2010, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,728, Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 8, 2010, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,728, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 19, 2010, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,728, Response filed Jun. 8, 2010 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 8, 2010, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/647,728, Response filed Sep. 22, 2010 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 13, 2010, 6 pgs.
Application Serial No. PCT/US00/17136, International Search Report mailed Nov. 16, 2000, 5 pgs.
“Auction Watch: Buyer and Seller Services”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20000830150100/http://www.auctionwatch.com>, (Aug. 15, 2000), 30 pgs.
“Auctionwatch”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20000830150100/http://www.auctionwatch.com>, (Aug. 15, 2008), 46 pgs.
“AuctionWatch.com”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org.web/20011217190108/wsacp.auctionwatch.com/login.html?ret=/my/acp/>, 19 pgs.
“Blackthorne Products Page”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19990508065201/ www.blackthornesw.com/Bthome/products>, (1999), 2 pgs.
Chinese Application Serial No. 02824589, First Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2007, 31 pgs.
Chinese Application Serial No. 02824589, Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2007, 16 pgs.
Chinese Application Serial No. 02824589, Second Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2007, 7 pgs.
Chinese Application Serial No. 03813485.3, Office Action Mailed Jan. 9, 2009, 5 pgs.
Chinese Application Serial No. 03813485.3, Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2009, 8 pgs.
“DHL and UPS offer country-specific services”, Transportation and distribution , vol. 38, Iss. 12, (Dec. 1997), 18.
“Ebay—Your Personal Trading Community”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991007062815/www.ebay.com>, (Oct. 1999), 23 pgs.
European Application Serial No. 01959319.3, Office Action mailed May 15, 2007, 3 pgs.
European Application Serial No. 02723169.5, Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2008, 6 pgs.
European Application Serial No. 02723169.5, Supplementary European Search Report mailed Sep. 26, 2006, 3 pgs.
European Application Serial No. 03757395.3, Search Report mailed Sep. 4, 2009, 2 pgs.
“Frequently Asked Questions about Mister Lister”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://pages.ebay.co.uk/help/sellerguide/mr-lister-faq.html>, (Copyright 1995-2005), 5 pgs.
“Google looking at more Country Specific Domains”, Europmedia, (Jan. 17, 2002), 1 pg.
“Hello direct store joins eBay network of merchants”, PR Newswire, New York, NY, (May 23, 2002), 2 pgs.
International Application Serial No. 1921/KOLNP/2004, First Examination Report mailed Apr. 7, 2008, 11 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US00/17136 International Search Report mailed Nov. 16, 2000, 6 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US00/32088, International Search Report mailed Apr. 4, 2001, 6 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/02584, International Search Report mailed Apr. 16, 2001, 4 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/04811, International Search Report mailed Jun. 28, 2001, 6 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/12398 International Search Report mailed Aug. 27, 2001, 3 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US01/23854, International Search Report mailed Dec. 28, 2001, 6 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US02/04692, International Search Report mailed Jun. 12, 2002, 5 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US03/17915, International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Mar. 26, 2004, 10 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US03/17915, International Search Report mailed Nov. 26, 2003, 6 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US99/18510, International Search Report mailed Oct. 29, 1999, 4 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US99/29312, International Search Report mailed Apr. 18, 2000, 6 pgs.
Korean Application Serial No. 2004-7020202, Office Action mailed Apr. 30, 2009, 6 pgs.
Korean Application Serial No. 2004-7020202, Office Action mailed Aug. 29, 2008, 17 pgs.
Korean Application Serial No. 2004-7020202, Office Action mailed Nov. 25, 2009, 6 pgs.
Korean Application Serial No. 2004-7020202, Preliminary Rejection mailed Nov. 30, 2007, 10 pgs.
“New eBay-like auction software released”, Business Wire, Business Editors/High-Tech Writers; Business Wire; New York, (Mar. 17, 1999), 2 pp.
“Onsale Joins Fray as Online Shopping Picks Up Speed: Internet Booms”, Computer Reseller News, CMP Publications, Inc., USA, (Jun. 5, 1995), 1 pg.
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online; Unique Internet retail service debuts with week-long charity auction for The Computer Museum in Boston”, Business Wire, Dialog Web. 0489267 BW0022, (May 24, 1995), 3 pages.
“Photodisc localizes Internet presence to better serve global markets;Adds country-specific content and languages to its Award-wining Websites”, Business Wire, (May 27, 1998), 3 pgs.
“Thin Client”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin—client>, (Feb. 15, 2008), 13 pgs.
“Thin Client Computing”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20040122033629/http://www.thinclient.net>, (Jan. 22, 2004), 24 pgs.
“Yahoo Homepage”, Internet Archive Wayback Machine, http://web.archive.org/web/19991003015603/http://www.yahoo.com/index.html, (Oct. 3, 1999), 1 p.
“Yahoo!—Regional:Countries:Afghanistan”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20060921181441/http://dir.yahoo.com/Regional/countries/afghanistan>, (Jun. 16, 1997), 1 pg.
“Yahoo!—Regional:Countries:Sweden”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19970616194441/www.yahoo.com/Regional/Countries/Sweden/>, (Jun. 16, 1997), 2 pgs.
“Yahoo! Auctions Celebrates One-Year Anniversary; As Online Auction Usage Continues to Grow, Yahoo! Is Quickly Becoming the World Marketplace of the New Millennium”, Business Wire, (Sep. 14, 1999), 3 pages.
Akin, David, “Web retailing gains market muscle as concerns fade: Record season: Increasing number of sites catering for Canadian dollars”, Financial Post, p. 4, XP002905105, (Dec. 26, 1998), 3 pages.
Alice, Michele, “eBay's ‘Mister Lister’ Auction Management Software”, Auctionbytes-Update, No. 22, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.auctionbytes.com/cab/abu/y200/m09/abu0022/s05>, (Sep. 24, 2000), 3 pgs.
Andale.Com, “Andale Lister”, [Online]. [Archived Oct. 25, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021025121452/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/sell.jsp>, 3 pgs.
Andale.Com, “Andale Lister: Bulk List”, [Online]. [Archived Oct. 5, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021005074745/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/qs—sell—details—bulklist.jsp>, 1 pg.
Andale.Com, “Andale lister: Design Center”, [Online]. [Archived Dec. 15, 2004]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021215192044/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/qs—sell—details—designcenter.jsp>, 1 pg.
Andale.Com, “Andale Lister: In-Line Images”, [Online]. [Archived Dec. 15, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021215192408/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/qs—sell—details—inlineimg.jsp>, 1 pg.
Andale.com, “Andale Lister: Inventory Dashboard”, [Online]. [Archived Dec. 15, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021215192408/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/qs—sell—details—invdashboard.jsp, 2 pgs.
Andale.com, “Andale Lister: Launch Scheduler”, [Online]. [Archived Dec. 15, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021215192724/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/qs—sell—details—launchsched.jsp, 1 pg.
Andale.com, “Andale Lister: Online or Offline”, [Online]. [Archived Dec. 15, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021215194722/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/qs—sell—details—onoffline.jsp>, 2 pgs.
Andale.com, “Andale Lister: Overview”, [Online]. [Archived Dec. 1, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20021201081906/http://www.andale.com/corp/products/qs—overview.jsp, 4 pgs.
AuctionWatch.com, et al., “”, AuctionWatch.com's Official Guide to Online Buying and Selling: Professional Tips, Tactics and Techniques at Your Fingertips., Prima Publishing, Roseville, CA. ISBN 0-7615-2999-3, (2000), 307 pgs.
AuctionWatch.com, et al., “AuctionWatch CD”, AuctionWatch.com's Official Guide to Online Buying and Selling: Professional Tips, Tactics and Techniques at Your Fingertips., Prima Publishing, Roseville, CA., (2000).
Baumann, G. W, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin,, (Jan. 1995), 83-84.
Bidnbuy, “Going, going, virtually gone . . . ”, Business and Finance Dialog File 20#06012646, (Jun. 17, 1999), 3 pgs.
Business Wire, “Bay Builder Releases Major Innovation for Online Wireless Auctions.”, Recovered via Dialog Database on Feb. 15, 2008, (Mar. 10, 2000), 2 pgs.
Business Wire, “Mediappraise Receives National Award for Web-based Technology That Enables Companies to Solve Thorny HR Problem”, Business Wire, (Dec. 14, 1998), 1-2.
Business Wire, “Subasta.com Enters Into Strategic Partnership with From2.com”, Business Wire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 43206061, (Jul. 16, 1999), 2 pages.
Business Wire, “Subasta.com, the Premier Online Auction Board for Latin America, Spain, and the Hispanic Sector of the U.S., Has Attracted Over 60,000 Viewers in Less Than Two Months!”, Business Wire, (Jul. 16, 1999), 2 pages.
Business Wire, “Yahoo! Launches Three New European Auctions Services; Yahoo! Italy, Yahoo! Spain and Yahoo! Sweden Unveil New Local Auctions”, Business Wire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 45061209, (Sep. 23, 1999), 3 pages.
Clemons, E, “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities”, Proceedings of ICIS 91: 12th International Conference on Information Systems, (Dec. 16-18, 1991), 53-61.
Collete, Stacy, “Thin Clients Pull in Car Customers: Auto Auction company eyes move to Web.(Industry Trend or Event)”, Computerworld recovered via dialog database on Feb. 15, 2008, (Apr. 5, 1999), p. 41(1).
Cooper, C., et al., “Playing Catch-Up: U.S. Web Firms Get Slow Start in Europe, Amid Crowded Field—Used to Being First and Best at Home, They Stumble in World's No. 2 Market—Pouncing on Amazon Delays”, Wall Street Journal Europe, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 46338867, (Nov. 15, 1999), 5 pages.
Graham, I, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe”, Focus Theme, 1-3.
Grubbs, L., “Top 5 auction utilities”, PC World.com, San Francisco, CA, (Dec. 4, 2000), 2 pgs.
Hansell, Saul, “Meg Whitman and eBay, Net Survivors”, New York Times, (May 5, 2002), 5 pgs.
Hauser, R, “Anonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 39(3), (Mar. 1996), 363-366.
Hess, C M, et al., “Computerized Loan Organization System: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18(3), (Sep. 1994), 251-274.
Hutchinson, Art, “E-Commerce : Building a Model”, Art. Communications Week recovered via Dialog Database on Feb. 15, 2008., (Mar. 17, 1997), p. 57.
Klein, S, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, 1-4.
Lassila, Ora, “Web metadata; A Matter of Semantics”, IEEE Internet Computing, v2i4p30 Proquest #1424143061, (1998), 15 pgs.
Lee, H G, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, Focus Theme, 1-5.
Lee, H. G, “Electronic brokerage and electronic auction: the impact of IT on market structures”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, (1996), 397-406.
M2 Presswire, “HP completes online strategy with launch of e-commerce site”, Proquest#43225990, (Jun. 29, 1999), 3 pgs.
M2 Presswire, “United Technologies: UTC's Carrier Corp. teams with FreeMarkets to create largest Asian-based B2B online auction market to date; UTC Division identifies average annual savings of more than 16 percent on electric motors through FreeMarkets B2B eMarketpla”, M2 Presswire, (Mar. 22, 2000), 2 pages.
Malone, T., et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”, Communications of the ACM, 14(25), (Jun. 1987), 484-497.
Mardesich, Jodi, “Site Offers Clearance for End-of-Life Products—Onsale Takes Auction Gavel Electronic”, Computer Reseller News, (Jul. 8, 1996), 2 pps.
Massimb, Marcel, “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity”, Financial Analysts Journal, 50(1), (Jan./Feb. 1994), 39-50.
McClenahen, John, “Net Gains”, Industry Week,Proquest # 41808971,., (May 17, 1999), 8 pgs.
Meade, J., “Visual 360: A Performance Appraisal System That's ‘Fun’”, HR Magazine, Society for Human Resource Management., (Jul. 1999), 3 pgs.
Merrill, K., “GE Capital to Extend Integrator Buying Spree”, Computer Reseller News, (Jul. 1996), pp. 2 and 32.
Neo, B S, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems; vol. 1(5), (Dec. 1992), 278-288.
Pollick, M., “Sold! on eBay: As antique and collectible dealers see their sales increase through online auctions such as eBay, more of them are deciding that the internet is not something to be afraid of”, Sarasota Herald Tribune, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 45499060, (Oct. 11, 1999), 8 pages.
Post, D L, et al., “Application of auctions as a pricing mechanism for the interchange of electric power”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), (Aug. 1995), 1580-1584.
PR Newswire Europe Ltd., “Mitsubishi Venture, Wells Fargo Partner to Offer Multi-Currency E-Commerce Storefront”, PR Newswire, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 39345965, (Mar. 1, 1999), 3 pages.
Preist, Chris, et al., “Adaptive Agents in a Persistent Shout Double Auction”, International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, Proceedings of the first international conference on Information and computation economies, (1999), 11-18.
Pressler, Margaret, “Sells on eBay; Housewife finds herself head of multinational software firm”, Washington Post, Proquest # 44484325, (Sep. 5, 1999), 3 pgs.
Reck, Martin, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, 1-7.
Resnick, Paul, “Reputation systems”, Communications of the ACM, 43(12), (Dec. 2000), 45-48.
Rockoff, T E, et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 5(4), (Jan. 1, 1995), 10-16.
Schmid, B F, “The Development of Electronic Commerce”, EM—Electronic Markets, No. 9-10, (Oct. 1993), 2 pgs.
Schneider, G. M, et al., “An Introduction to Programming and Problem Solving with Pascal”, An Introduction to Programming and Problem Solving with Pascal, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1982), 3 Pages.
Siegmann, Ken, “Nowhere to go but up”, PC Week; vol. 12(42), Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, (Oct. 23, 1995), 1-3.
Tak, Y., et al., “The Sift Information Dissemination System”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems. vol. 24, Issue 4. ACM Press, (Dec. 1999), 529-565.
Tapscott, D., “eBay endagners traditional papers auctioneer can pack far more punch in your sales pitch”, National Post, Proquest# 54945579, (Oct. 9, 1999), 3 pgs.
Tjostheim, Ingvar, “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web”, Norwegian Computing Center (NR), 1-10.
Turban, E, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment”, Focus Theme, 1-5.
Van Heck, E., et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry”, Focus Theme, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, 6 pgs.
Warbelow, A, et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System”, Harvard Business School Case/Study, HBVR#9-190-001, USA, (Jul. 1989), 1-15.
Wilson, D., “Going . . . Going . . . Gone!Bargain-hunters and collectors can scour auctions from home via the internet”, The Gazette, Proquest #4116732, (Apr. 27, 1999), 4 pgs.
Wilson, T., “Act Globally, Think Locally”, InternetWeek, Issue 789, Obtained from Proquest, Document No. 46352181, (Nov. 15, 1999), 4 p.
Zwass, V., “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, vol. 1, No. 1, (Fall 1996), 3-23.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, 312 Amendment filed Jan. 10, 2010, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,301, PTO Response to 312 Amendment mailed Feb. 3, 2010, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,126, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 30, 2010, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Interview Summary filed Apr. 15, 2011, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 18, 2011, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 28, 2011, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Response filed Jan. 14, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 10, 2011, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Oct. 15, 2009, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 24, 2011, 21 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Appeal Brief filed Apr. 25, 2011, 32 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,129, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed May 13, 2011, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2011, 25 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2011, 21 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Non Final office Action mailed May 10, 2012, 34 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response Filed Nov. 30, 2011 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2011, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response filed Jun. 14, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2011, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275 , Response filed Mar. 19, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2011, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275, Non Final Office Action Mailed Dec. 30, 2011, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/693,275, Notice of Allowance mailed May 8, 2012, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,426, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 31, 2011, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,426, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 26, 2012, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,426, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 23, 2012, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/080,426, Response filed Dec. 28, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 31, 2011, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,916, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2012, 16 pgs.
Chinese Application Serial No. 02824589.X , Response filed Mar. 1, 2008 to Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2007, 16 pgs.
Chinese Application Serial No. 02824589.X , Response filed Aug. 7, 2007 to Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2007, 31 pgs.
European Application Serial No. 02723169.5 Response filed Jun. 14, 2011 to Office Action mailed Feb. 15, 2011, 12 pgs.
European Application Serial No. 02723169.5, Office Action mailed Feb. 15, 2011, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421 , Response filed Sep. 7, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 10, 2012, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2012, 30 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,916, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2012, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,916, Response filed Jan. 17, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2012, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,916, Response filed Aug. 30, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2012, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,646 , Response filed Dec. 3, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2012, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,646, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 19, 2012, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,646, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 10, 2013, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Appeal Decision mailed May 29, 2013, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/602,110, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Mar. 7, 2007, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed Feb. 11, 2009, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed May 12, 2008, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,127, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request mailed May 14, 2010, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,128, Notice of Allowance mailed May 30, 2013, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Apr. 30, 2013, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Non Final Office Action mailed May 23, 2013, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,421, Response filed Apr. 30, 2013 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2012, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,916, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 30, 2013, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/285,916, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2013, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,646, 312 Amendment filed Mar. 7, 2013, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,646, PTO Response to 312 Amendment mailed Mar. 14, 2013, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,233, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/550,233, Response filed Jun. 24, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013, 14 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100228536 A1 Sep 2010 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09976301 Oct 2001 US
Child 12783458 US