The present invention relates generally to implantable medical devices and more particularly to a device and method for controlling breathing and for treating Central Sleep Apnea.
History
Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) and particularly Central Sleep Apnea (CSA) is a breathing disorder closely associated with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). The heart function of patients with heart failure may be treated with various drugs, or implanted cardiac pacemaker devices. The breathing function of patients with heart failure may be treated with Continuous Positive Air Pressure (CPAP) devices or Nocturnal Nasal Oxygen. These respiratory therapies are especially useful during periods of rest or sleep. Recently, implanted devices to directly address respiration disturbances have been proposed. Some proposed therapeutic devices combine cardiac pacing therapies with phrenic nerve stimulation to control breathing.
Phrenic nerve pacing as a separate and stand alone therapy has been explored for paralyzed patients where it is an alternative to forced mechanical ventilation, and for patients with the most severe cases of central sleep apnea. For example, Ondine's Curse has been treated with phrenic nerve pacemakers since at least the 1970's. In either instance, typically, such phrenic nerve pacemakers place an electrode in contact with the phrenic nerve and they pace the patient's phrenic nerve at a constant rate. Such therapy does not permit natural breathing and it occurs without regard to neural respiratory drive.
Motivation for Therapy
SDB exists in two primary forms. The first is central sleep apnea (CSA) and the second is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In OSA the patient's neural breathing drive remains intact, but the pulmonary airways collapse during inspiration, which prevents air flow causing a form of apnea. Typically, such patients awake or are aroused as a result of the apnea event. The forced airflow of CPAP helps keep the airways open providing a useful therapy to the OSA patient.
CSA patients also exhibit apnea but from a different cause. These CSA patients have episodes of reduced neural breathing drive for several seconds before breathing drive returns. The loss of respiratory drive and apnea is due to a dysfunction in the patient's central respiratory control located in the brain. This dysfunction causes the patient's breathing pattern to oscillate between too rapid breathing called hyperventilation and periods of apnea (not breathing). Repeated bouts of rapid breathing followed by apnea are seen clinically and this form of disordered breathing is called Cheyne-Stokes breathing or CSR. Other patterns have been seen clinically as well including bouts of hyperventilation followed by hypopneas only.
In patients with CHF, prognosis is significantly worse when sleep apnea is present. A high apnea-hypopnea index (a measure of the number of breathing disturbances per hour) has been found to correlate to a poor prognosis for the patient. The swings between hyperventilation and apnea characterized by central sleep apnea have three main adverse consequences, namely: large swings in arterial blood gases (oxygen and carbon dioxide); arousals and shifts to light sleep; and large negative swings in intrathoracic pressure during hyperventilation. The large swings in blood gases lead to decreased oxygen flow to the heart, activation of the sympathetic nervous system, endothelial cell dysfunction, and pulmonary arteriolar vasoconstriction. Arousals contribute to increased sympathetic nervous activity, which has been shown to predict poor survival of patients with heart failure. Negative intrathoracic pressure, which occurs during the hyperventilation phase of central apnea, increases the after load and oxygen consumption of the left ventricle of the heart. It also causes more fluid to be retained in the patient's lungs. As a result of these effects the patient's condition deteriorates.
In spite of advances in care and in knowledge there is a large unmet clinical need for patients with sleep disordered breathing especially those exhibiting central sleep apnea and congestive heart failure.
The device of the present invention can sense the patients breathing and it can distinguish inhalation or inspiration from exhalation or expiration.
The device can periodically stimulate the phrenic nerve as required. In some embodiments the stimulation may be invoked automatically in response to sensed physiologic conditions. In some embodiments the device can stop the delivery of therapy in response to sensed conditions. In some embodiments the device can be prescribed and dispensed and the therapy delivered without regard to the sensed conditions. As a result, the device may be used to detect and intervene in order to correct episodes of sleep disordered breathing or the device may intervene to prevent episodes of sleep disordered breathing from occurring. The methods that are taught here may be used alone to treat a patient or they may be incorporated into a cardiac stimulating device where the respiration therapy is merged with a cardiac therapy. The therapy and its integration with cardiac stimulation therapy and the architecture for carrying out the therapy are quite flexible and may be implemented in any of several forms.
Hardware implementation and partitioning for carrying out the methods of the invention are also flexible. For example the phrenic nerve stimulation may be carried out with a transvenous lead system lodged in one of the cardiophrenic vein a short distance from the heart. One or both phrenic nerves may be accessed with leads. Either one side or both (right and left) phrenic nerves may be stimulated. Alternatively the phrenic nerve may be accessed through a large vein such as the jugular or the superior vena cava.
Because of the variety of anatomy and branching of the smaller veins, all non-central veins proximate to the phrenic nerve, including the pericardiophrenic, are call “phrenic nerve”. For example, the left or right pericadiophrenic veins are suitable for left or right phrenic nerve stimulation because of their proximity to the phrenic nerves, relatively simple catheter access, relative distance and separation from the excitable heart tissue by non-excitable tissue such as the pericardial membrane. Preferred placement of a stimulation electrode can be characterized by: not triggering heartbeat when stimulation current is applied, trigging breath, minimum phrenic nerve stimulation current, and lack of stimulation of different muscle groups not involved in respiration. As an alternative, a stimulation electrode may be placed in the pericardial space on the heart, near the phrenic nerve but electrically isolated from the heart.
The lead and stimulation electrodes may also take any of several forms. Leads may contain anchoring devices to prevent slippage. Multiple stimulation electrodes may be placed along the length of a lead. Any pair of these electrodes may be used for bipolar stimulation. The stimulator may switch between different electrodes to achieve capture of the phrenic nerve at a minimum energy level without stimulating the heart. Any electrode may be used as a sensory electrode, even those engaged in intermittent stimulation. Monopolar stimulation may also be used. When the electrode is monopolar, the reference electrode is likely the stimulator case. Leads may be coated with medications such as, but not limited to, steroids.
Implementation of respiration detection and measurement may also take any of several forms. Transthoracic impedance measurement may be taken from electrodes implanted at locations in the body to measure or sense the change in lung volume associated with breathing. Alternatively one or more implanted pressure transducers in or near the pleural cavity may be used to track pressure changes associated with breathing. Alternatively, respiration sensing may be carried out by an airflow sensor, a respiratory belt, a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, and/or a CO2 sensor. In conjunction, or in alternative, sensing electrodes may be used to sense events such as cardiac electrical activity, patient activity, patient metabolic state. Knowledge of breathing rates and patterns are useful in carrying out the invention but distinguishing reliably the inspiration phase from expiration phase is a breath is particularly important for timing the delivery of the stimulation.
Any detection system used to trigger stimulation has a disadvantage of being susceptible to non-respiratory signals such as an artifact of motion, sudden arousal, or cough. The recognition of possible artifacts and comparison to stored breath history of normal breath patterns may be advantageous. If a given breathing pattern significantly differs from the template, then the breath may be rejected and stimulation deferred. Artifacts may be recognized and rejected by identification of: an unacceptably fast inhalation slope, an unacceptably high amplitude of tidal volume and/or the presence of a high frequency component in the respiratory signal spectrum. In all cases the stimulator logic may reject this “breath” and not apply a stimulation burst. It may also be useful to reject signals for some duration immediately following a stimulation pulse. This so-called “refractory period” may be measured as the duration of stimulation plus minimum time of expiration. In addition, an implantable stimulator may be equipped with an accelerometer. Acceleration signals may be used to reject a breath or several breaths and delay stimulation. After a normal pattern of breathing is restored, stimulation is resumed.
We consider that breathing has an inspiration phase followed by an expiration phase. Each breath is followed by a pause when the lungs are “still” before the next breath's inspiration. The device delivers phrenic nerve stimulation after the start of inspiration preferably toward the start of exhalation. The duration and magnitude of the stimulation is selected to “extend” the expiration phase or the respiratory pause of a naturally initiated breath. We note relatively little change in lung volume and little air exchange during the stimulation phase of the therapy. We have observed that prolongation of a natural breath, while keeping some air trapped in the lungs, delays the inspiration phase of next natural breath until the air trapped in the lungs is exhaled. For this reason our therapy has a tendency to lower the observed breathing rate. Typically the stimulation maintains activation of the diaphragm long enough to mimic a patient holding their breath by not letting the diaphragm relax. This mechanism of action controls the rate of breathing by increasing the effective duration of each breath.
Our experimental animal work has demonstrated the ability of the stimulation regime to down-regulate breathing rate (and minute ventilation) to a desired (preset) value while maintaining natural inspiration (i.e. by prolonging exhalation and extending the respiratory pause phases of the breath) without blocking the phrenic nerve. We believe that maintenance of natural inspiration is important since it allows prevention of airway collapse and retains certain capacity of the body to auto regulate rate of inspiration and depth of breathing. We also demonstrated that unilateral and transvenous stimulation is sufficient to carry out the invention and insures adequate levels of patient safety. In the process of prolonging the respiratory pause we “stilled” the lungs (no air movement occurred) while keeping one lung inflated. We believe that the mechanism of action for this observed effect is a physiologic feedback that prevents the respiration control center of the central nervous system from initiating the following breath. In other words we have invented a novel and practical therapy by substantially immobilizing at least one lung of the patient by maintaining the diaphragm in the contracted state by transvenous electrical stimulation of a phrenic nerve for the duration sufficient to substantially reduce breathing rate and alter the blood gas Composition of the patient.
A preferred embodiment and best mode of the invention is illustrated in the attached drawings where identical reference numerals indicate identical structure throughout the figures and where multiple instances of a reference numeral in a figure show the identical structure at another location to improve the clarity of the figures, and where:
In this embodiment a transvenous lead 107 passes from the IMD 101 and passes through venous vasculature to enter the cardiophrenic vein 108 on the right side of the patient. The cardiophrenic vein 108 lies next to the phrenic nerve 104 along the heart. Electrical stimulation pulses supplied to the stimulation electrode 110 on lead 107 interact with the phrenic nerve to stimulate it and thus activate the diaphragm 106. In the figure a series of concentric circles 112 indicate electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve. In this embodiment the stimulation electrode 110 lies far enough away from the heart 103 to avoid stimulating the heart 103. In this embodiment only one branch of the phrenic nerve 104 is stimulated and the other side of nerve is under normal physiologic control.
A respiration electrode 114 on lead 107 cooperates with an indifferent electrode on the can of the IMD 101 to source and sink low amplitude electrical pulses that are used to track changes in lung volume over time. This well known impedance plethysmography technique is used to derive the inspiration and expiration events of an individual breath and may be used to track breathing rate. This impedance measurement process is indicated in the diagram by the dotted line 116 radiating from the electrode site of respiration electrode 114 to the IMD 101. Transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve from a single lead carrying an impedance measuring respiration electrode is a useful system since it permits minimally invasive implantation of the system. However other architectures, are permissible and desirable in some instances.
Also seen in this figure is a pressure transducer 209 located in the pleural cavity and connected to the IMD 101 via a lead. The pressure transducer 209 tracks pressure changes associated with breathing and provides this data to the implanted device 101. The pressure transducer is an alternative to the impedance measurement system for detecting respiration. Such intraplueral pressure signal transducers are known in the respiration monitoring field.
The IMD 101 can provide stimulation pulses to the stimulation electrode 110. A companion indifferent electrode 306 may be used to sink or source the stimulation current generated in analog circuits 303. A portion of the exterior surface 302 of the IMD 101 may be used with respiration electrode 114 to form an impedance plethysmograph. In operation, logic 305 will command the issuance of a train of pulses to the respiration electrode 114 and measure the amplitude of the signal as a function of time in circuits 304. This well known process can measure the respiration of the patient and find the inspiration phase and the expiration phase of a breath. Respiration data collected over minutes and hours can be logged, transmitted, and/or used to direct the therapy.
When the therapy is invoked by being turned on by the programmer 301 or in response to high rate breathing above an intervention set point, the logic 305 commands the stimulation the phrenic nerve via the stimulation electrode 110 at a time after the beginning of the inspiration phase. Preferable the stimulation begins after the onset of exhalation. There is some flexibility in onset of stimulation. The shape of the stimulation pulses is under study and it may be beneficial to have the logic 305 command stimulation at higher amplitudes of energy levels as the stimulation progresses. It may also be desirable to have stimulation ramp up and ramp down during the therapy. It may prove desirable to stimulate episodically. The therapy may be best administered to every other breath or in a random pattern. The programmer may permit the patient to regulate the therapy as well. However in each case the stimulation of the diaphragm “stills” the diaphragm resulting in an amount of air trapped in at least one lung and extends the breath duration.
The duration of the stimulation is under the control of logic 305. It is expected that the therapy will be dispensed with a fixed duration of pulses corresponding to breathing rate. It should be clear that other strategies for setting the duration of stimulation are within the scope of the invention. For example the breathing rate data can be used to set the stimulation duration to reduce breathing rate to a fraction of the observed rate. The therapy may also be invoked in response to detected high rate breathing or turned on at a fixed time of day. In a device where activity sensors are available the device may deliver therapy at times of relative inactivity (resting or sleeping). Activity sensors may also help in the detection and rejection of artifacts. An accelerometer, such as those used in cardiac pacing, would be an exemplary activity sensor.
Trace 504 is associated with the unilateral delivery of stimulation 508 to a phrenic nerve. In the tracing the start of stimulation at time 518 is well after the start of inspiration and corresponds approximately to the reversal of airflow from inspiration to expiration as seen at time 518. Very shortly after the stimulation begins the animal inhales more air seen by the “bump” 520 in the tracing 504 in panel 5B. A small increment in the total volume corresponding to this bump is seen at the same time in panel 5A. Of particular interest is the relatively flat tracing 522 corresponding to no significant change in lung volume during stimulation. Once stimulation terminates the lungs expel air as seen at volume change 524 in panel 5A corresponding to outflow labeled 512 in panel 5B. Only after the exhalation outflow 512 was complete did the sedated experimental animal initiate the next breath (not shown). Thus duration of breath was extended in this case from approximately 2 seconds to approximately 6 seconds resulting in the breathing rate reduction from 30 to 10 breaths per minute. The data support the assertion that adequate phrenic stimulation initiated after inspiration and during expiration can “prolong” or “hold” the breath and thus regulate or regularize breathing which it the value of the invention.
It may be noted that the stimulation waveforms vary in
This case claims priority from and the benefit thereof and incorporates entirely: U.S. Provisional Application 60/737,808, filed Nov. 18, 2005, and entitled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea;” U.S. Provisional Application 60/743,062, filed Dec. 21, 2005, and entitled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea;” and U.S. Provisional Application 60/743,326, filed Feb. 21, 2006, and entitled “System and Method to Modulate Phrenic Nerve to Prevent Sleep Apnea.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4129125 | Lester et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4827935 | Geddes et al. | May 1989 | A |
4830008 | Meer | May 1989 | A |
5056519 | Vince | Oct 1991 | A |
5146918 | Kallok et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5170802 | Mehra | Dec 1992 | A |
5265604 | Vince | Nov 1993 | A |
5483969 | Testerman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485851 | Erickson | Jan 1996 | A |
6006134 | Hill et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6132384 | Christopherson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6212435 | Lattner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266564 | Hill et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6360740 | Ward et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6415183 | Scheiner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449507 | Hill et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463327 | Lurie et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6532388 | Hill et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537228 | Lambert | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542774 | Hill et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6587726 | Lurie et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589188 | Street et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6641542 | Cho et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684101 | Daum | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6718208 | Hill et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
RE38705 | Hill et al. | Feb 2005 | E |
6881192 | Park | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6890306 | Poezevera | May 2005 | B2 |
6928324 | Park et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934583 | Weinberg et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937903 | Schuler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964641 | Cho et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7025730 | Cho et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7070568 | Koh | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7077132 | Berthon-Jones | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082331 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7094207 | Koh | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7155278 | King et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7179229 | Koh | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184829 | Hill et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200442 | Koh et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7212862 | Park et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7223244 | Koh | May 2007 | B1 |
7225019 | Jahns et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225021 | Park et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7245971 | Park et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269457 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269459 | Koh | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7277757 | Casavant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7340302 | Falkenberg et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7357775 | Koh | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7361146 | Bharmi | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363086 | Koh et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7371220 | Koh et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
20010003799 | Boveja | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20030195571 | Burnes et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050085734 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085865 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085866 | Tehrani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085867 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085868 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085869 | Tehrani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050165457 | Benser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197588 | Freeberg | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050288729 | Libbus et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030894 | Tehrani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036294 | Tehrani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060122662 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142815 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149334 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155341 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167523 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060229677 | Moffitt et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247729 | Tehrani et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070021795 | Tehrani | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080154330 | Tehrani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161878 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167695 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177347 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183239 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183240 | Tehrani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183264 | Bly et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188903 | Tehrani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188904 | Tehrani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2008092246 | Aug 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070118183 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60737808 | Nov 2005 | US | |
60743062 | Dec 2005 | US | |
60743326 | Feb 2006 | US |