The embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to putting aiming systems and more particularly to systems and methods for analyzing the slope of a putting green.
Golf is a popular pastime in which players use various clubs to hit a ball into a series of holes on a golf course in as few strokes as possible. Putting is a very important component of the game. When putting, the golfer must determine the correct line of travel of the golf ball to the intended target (i.e., the hole). Before putting, the golfer will analyze the distance of the putt as well as the slope of the green in the direction which they are putting. Errors in the analysis of the putt often result in a missed putt, and thus an increase in the golfer's score. Because the putter is often the most used club throughout the round, the decrease in errors while putting is crucial to reducing the overall score of the round.
The process of analyzing the slope, speed, and other factors of a putting green is known as “green reading” and the process can be referred to as “reading the green”. Many methods exist for reading the green, however, each method has the same goal of determining a putting line and pace which results in the golf ball going in the hole. In particular, it is crucial for golfers to accurately read the slope of the green at various points along the path the golf ball travels after being putted by the golfer. Often, golfers will simply use intuition, eyesight, and other cerebral measurements from their basic knowledge of physics, or simple slope analysis to determine an optimal start line of the putt.
Devices have been created to analyze the slope of the green, including levels placed on the putting surface or incorporated into the golf club which have indices to measure the slope of the green. While effective, these devices are not permitted for use by most governing bodies which control the rules of golf and especially golf tournaments.
Other techniques which are allowed by most governing bodies of golf and golf tournaments include feeling the slope with a golfer's feet which the golfer stands perpendicular to the ground along the line of the putt and determines the difference in pressure felt in his feet on different slopes. Also, “plumb bobbing” in which the golfer holds the putter and analyzes how the putter pivots about a pivot point (e.g., the hand or fingers holding the grip of the putter). If performed correctly, gravity holds the shaft and putter head in a vertical orientation and the golfer will analyze the angle of the putter in reference to their body position or in reference to a line between a point on the surface and the hole. In each case, the body position is preferably aligned perpendicular to the slope of the green.
This summary is provided to introduce a variety of concepts in a simplified form that is further disclosed in the detailed description of the embodiments. This summary is not intended for determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The embodiments provided herein relate to a system and method to assess the slope of a putting surface using indices on a putter head is disclosed. A putter having a putter head and a plurality of indices which are marked on the putter head is disclosed. Each of the indices correspond to a slope of the putting surface. The user stands on a 0% slope putting surface and identifies an object on the putting surface and holds the putter at a pivot point above the object to allow the putter head to move in a pendulum-style motion until it reaches a balanced position. The user then aligns their dominant eye vertically with the pivot point and the object to identify and mark a zero point. The user may then move to a putting surface having a known variation in slope and repeat the process to mark the remaining indices corresponding to variations in slope.
The embodiments provide an efficient and accurate method for identifying the slope of the putting surface, while providing a putter which conforms to current United States Golf Association (USGA) rules and regulations. The system and method can be used for various known putter styles and configurations by following the steps provided herein.
Previous methods require the user to use course knowledge, intuition, and rudimentary methods for assessing the slope of a putting surface. While some can master the skill of green reading, many find it difficult especially under pressure, in inclement weather and/or in variable light conditions. Systems such as AimPoint® can be difficult for players to master and implement, especially those who do not play and utilize the system consistently. Further, the AimPoint® system can require a significant amount of time to gather the appropriate data and implement when putting, thus decreasing the pace-of-play.
In one aspect, the plurality of indices are applied using semi-permanent or permanent application methods. The indices, once applied, are non-moveable and can be used repeatedly throughout rounds of golf to assess the slope of the putting surface.
In one aspect, the plurality of indices correspond to a slope one of the following: 1% slope, a 2% slope, a 3% slope, a 4% slope, and a 5% slope, wherein each of the 1% slope, a 2% slope, a 3% slope, a 4% slope, and a 5% slope is used to indicate a positive and a negative slope. While the above percentages are used by way of example, it is to be understood that the indices may be used to identify various other slope percentages and fractional portions thereof. It is to be understood that the slope angle can be measured in degrees rather than percent slope. However, percent slope is more commonly used in golf. The indices may be provided on any surface of the putter in accordance with the teachings provided herein. The indices may be oriented such that the indices progress towards the heal, toe, etc.
In one aspect, a template may be used to apply the plurality of indices. The template includes a plurality of marking measurements which correspond to the various slopes of a putting surface. The template is used as a measuring and marking device to accurately apply the indices to the putter head. During use, the user may position the template on top of or adjacent to the putter head to apply the indices which correspond to the linear marking measurements on the template.
A method for assessing the slope of the putting surface is provided. First, the user selects an object, or manually places on object which is positioned equidistant between the users left and right feet on a level, 0% slope surface. The user then holds the putter by the handle to establish a pivot point to allow the putter head to pivot in a pendulum-style motion until the putter head comes to rest at a balance point. The user then vertically aligns their dominant eye with the pivot point and object to establish a zero point on the putter head which is defined as the point on the putter head which is vertically aligned with the dominant eye, pivot point, and object. The zero point is marked using the applicator. The user may then stand on known putting slopes and repeat the above process to mark the various indices on the putter head. This process can be performed more quickly using a template. However, the template is not necessary to use and is provided as an alternative embodiment. In some instances, a laser may be used rather than the line-of-sight from a human.
A complete understanding of the present embodiments and the advantages and features thereof will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
The specific details of the single embodiment or variety of embodiments described herein are set forth in this application. Any specific details of the embodiments described herein are used for demonstration purposes only, and no unnecessary limitation(s) or inference(s) are to be understood or imputed therefrom.
Before describing in detail exemplary embodiments, it is noted that the embodiments reside primarily in combinations of components related to particular devices and systems. Accordingly, the device components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
In general, the embodiments provided herein relate to a system and method for marking a putter head to assess the slope of a putting surface. The markings on the putter head may be used as indices to allow the user to efficiently assess the slope of the putting surface, and thus implement an aiming system using the indices on the putter head. The system can be readily applied to various putter configurations.
The embodiments seek to provide the golfer (also referred to herein as “user” or “the user”) with a quick and accurate means by which to assess the slope of the green along the line of his/her putt. This slope assessment can be combined with other methods to quickly, reliably, and accurately determine an intended starting direction of the putt while conforming to United States Golf Association (USGA) rules and regulations.
As used herein, the term “object” is used to define any point which is used by the user to aid in defining the indices and specifically the zero point on the putter head. For example, the “object” could be a grain of sand or blade of grass.
As used herein, the term “zero point” is used to define a location on the putter head which aligns with the dominant eye of the user and the object positioned on the putting surface when the putter is held at the pivot point above the object and the user is standing on a 0% slope surface. This process is described and illustrated by
While the use of the term “putting surface” is used herein, it is to be understood that the process may be performed on any surface upon which the user may stand. For example, the user may perform the process of marking the putter at home, especially when performing the process of establishing the zero point.
As used herein, the term “balance point” is used to define the position at which the putter comes to rest while being held at the pivot point. The balance point is used in each step of the process as the user stands on putting surfaces having various slopes.
As used herein, the term “pivot point” is used to define the location on the putter being held by the user. Often, the user will use their fingers to apply pressure at a defined location on the handle or shaft of the putter. The pivot point may be changed based on the length of the putter, shaft configuration, shaft material, balance point of the putter, configuration of the putter head, style of grip, or other putter characteristics known in the arts.
In some embodiments, the user may utilize a mechanical means of holding the putter, such as a clamp or other device which can hold the putter handle.
In some embodiments, the indices position on the putter head may be calculated using the formula: (length of zero mark to X % indices)=tan (X %/100)*(length of pivot point to putter head). In such, the spacing of the indices on the putter head is standardized based on the aforementioned equation.
One skilled in the arts will readily understand that the indices may be provided on either side of the putter head (i.e., the putter face, or the rear side of the putter which opposes the face in the example of a blade-style putter). Other putter styles may allow for indices to be provided on various sides and surfaces of the putter in accordance with the teachings provided herein.
In some embodiments, the indices may be objectively or subjectively marked onto the putter. While embodiments are described wherein the indices are specifically calculated and marked, one skilled in the arts will readily understand that the indices may be marked using manual means which are not defined by mathematical concepts.
In
In some embodiments, the zero point may be assessed using an apparatus which holds the putter and allows the putter to move in a pendulum-style motion. This allows the putter to reach a balance point over a 0% slope surface. A plumb laser is arranged to intersect the pivot point and the zero point on the top of the putter head. As the surface is sloped in one direction, the indices can be marked on the putter head. In an alternative example, the placement of the indices can be calculated using the formula: (length of zero mark to X % indices)=tan (X %/100)*(length of pivot point to putter head).
In some embodiments, to establish a value for each of the indices on the putter head, the user may either use a putting surface having a known slope or may construct a surface which has a known slope. For example, the user may use a surface which can be systematically altered to have various slopes (e.g., 1°,2°,3°, etc.). This method may provide an accurate means of marking the putter head such that each of the indices corresponds to an accurate slope measurement. This process may also be performed using technical equipment utilized by the manufacturer of the putter. In another example, the user may simply estimate the slope of a putting surface using a digital, laser, and/or various types of mechanical levels (i.e., bubble levels, water levels, etc.).
Holding the putter in the described manner allows the putter head to move in a pendulum fashion above the ground (i.e., the putting surface). The pendulum movement of the putter head occurs as the user moves from a flat (i.e., a non-sloped) putting surface to a sloped putting surface, causing the putter head to pivot due to the force of gravity.
In general, the putter head is held at a minimal distance above the putting surface to retain accuracy when performing the task of marking the putter head or assessing the slope. To retain accuracy, the putter head is held at a minimal distance above the putting surface.
The applicator 320 may be a marker used to apply an ink or other marking on the putter head. However, the applicator 320 may be defined as any means of applying the indices to the putter head (e.g., a sticker, engraving, protrusion, etc.).
In some embodiments, the template 350 may include a plurality of openings 354 which allow the user to easily mark the putter using the applicator.
In some embodiments, the template 350 may not include the openings and may simply include reference lines which corresponds to the linear measurement markings to allows the user to accurately mark the putter head. More simple embodiments may not include reference lines and may only display the linear measurement markings.
In some embodiments, the template 350 may include an adhesive to retain the template 350 on the putter head 119. In other embodiments, the template 350 does not include an adhesive, allowing the user to position the template 350 in a suitable position and move the template 350 if needed. It is to be understood that while the illustrates show the template 350 being positioned on top of the putter head 119, the template may be positioned to the side of the putter. The template 350 is easily manipulated by the user such that it can be positioned suitably for marking various styles of putters including mallet-style, blade-style, and other styles of putters known in the arts.
It is to be understood by one skilled in the arts that the methods and system disclosed herein can be used with any style of putter including blade-style putters, mallet-style putters, or other variations of putters and putter heads. Some putters combine elements of a mallet and blade. These putters have a larger head size, often resembling a half-mallet, with a higher moment of inertia (MOI) for added stability and forgiveness. This design can benefit golfers with various stroke types. This type of putter is known as a “Half Mallet.” In this apparatus it is referred to as a “Wing”.
The system and methods described herein can be used with putters having various balance systems. For example, the system and method can be used with counterbalanced, face-balanced, toe-weighted, heel weighted, center-shafted and other putters constructed having various balance configurations.
The system and methods described herein can be used with putters having various grip types, shaft types, shapes, materials, and components. For example, the grip may be a circle grip, oval grip, flat oval grip, pistol grip, flat wide grip, modified pistol grip, or triangular grip. The grip options provide diverse tactile experiences and cater to distinct golfer preferences. Further, the grip may be counterbalanced, split, forward press, non-tapered, customizable, ergonomic, corded, hybrid, wrap style, lightweight, ribbed, or oversized.
The systems and methods can be used with any grip material including silicone, rubber, leather, gel, cork, isoprene, or synthetic rubbers.
In some embodiments, the system and method disclosed herein can be used with various putter shaft technologies and configurations known in the arts. The putter shaft characteristics may include rivets, thin-shaft configurations, thick shaft configurations, and the like. Further, the shaft length may be modified to suit the golfers needs. Shaft materials can include graphite, titanium, aluminum, steel or combinations of materials. The shaft placement may be onset, offset, center set, or other known configurations can be used while remaining effective for the system and methods described in this disclosure.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety to the extent allowed by applicable law and regulations. The systems and methods described herein may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof, and it is therefore desired that the present embodiment be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. Any headings utilized within the description are for convenience only and have no legal or limiting effect.
Many different embodiments have been disclosed herein, in connection with the above description and the drawings. It will be understood that it would be unduly repetitious and obfuscating to literally describe and illustrate every combination and subcombination of these embodiments. Accordingly, all embodiments can be combined in any way and/or combination, and the present specification, including the drawings, shall be construed to constitute a complete written description of all combinations and subcombinations of the embodiments described herein, and of the manner and process of making and using them, and shall support claims to any such combination or subcombination.
The foregoing is provided for purposes of illustrating, explaining, and describing embodiments of this disclosure. Modifications and adaptations to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of this disclosure.
As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
It should be noted that all features, elements, components, functions, and steps described with respect to any embodiment provided herein are intended to be freely combinable and substitutable with those from any other embodiment. If a certain feature, element, component, function, or step is described with respect to only one embodiment, then it should be understood that that feature, element, component, function, or step can be used with every other embodiment described herein unless explicitly stated otherwise. This paragraph therefore serves as antecedent basis and written support for the introduction of claims, at any time, that combine features, elements, components, functions, and steps from different embodiments, or that substitute features, elements, components, functions, and steps from one embodiment with those of another, even if the description does not explicitly state, in a particular instance, that such combinations or substitutions are possible. It is explicitly acknowledged that express recitation of every possible combination and substitution is overly burdensome, especially given that the permissibility of each and every such combination and substitution will be readily recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art.
In many instances entities are described herein as being coupled to other entities. It should be understood that the terms “coupled” and “connected” (or any of their forms) are used interchangeably herein and, in both cases, are generic to the direct coupling of two entities (without any non-negligible (e.g., parasitic intervening entities) and the indirect coupling of two entities (with one or more non-negligible intervening entities). Where entities are shown as being directly coupled together or described as coupled together without description of any intervening entity, it should be understood that those entities can be indirectly coupled together as well unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
While the embodiments are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that these embodiments are not to be limited to the particular form disclosed, but to the contrary, these embodiments are to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit of the disclosure. Furthermore, any features, functions, steps, or elements of the embodiments may be recited in or added to the claims, as well as negative limitations that define the inventive scope of the claims by features, functions, steps, or elements that are not within that scope.
An equivalent substitution of two or more elements can be made for any one of the elements in the claims below or that a single element can be substituted for two or more elements in a claim. Although elements can be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, it is to be expressly understood that one or more elements from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination and that the claimed combination can be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present embodiment is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described herein. A variety of modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings without departing from the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2463798 | Paisley | Mar 1949 | A |
2919922 | Skelly | Jan 1960 | A |
2976046 | McCullough, Jr. | Mar 1961 | A |
2995375 | Bukovey | Aug 1961 | A |
3306618 | Liljequist | Feb 1967 | A |
3429576 | Ikeda | Feb 1969 | A |
3826495 | Elkins, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
4082286 | La Breche | Apr 1978 | A |
4174839 | Marrs | Nov 1979 | A |
4291883 | Smart | Sep 1981 | A |
4340229 | Stuff, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
4659083 | Szczepanski | Apr 1987 | A |
4795157 | Bencriscutto | Jan 1989 | A |
5052690 | Sharp | Oct 1991 | A |
5219169 | Martini | Jun 1993 | A |
5839970 | Lombardo | Nov 1998 | A |
6659882 | Patsky | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663496 | Cameron | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6837799 | Cameron | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7758439 | Roenick | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7905792 | Stites | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8075416 | Stites | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8506422 | Monteiro | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20030109323 | Edel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040092328 | Patsky | May 2004 | A1 |
20060287130 | Allen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070149309 | Ford | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090118035 | Roenick | May 2009 | A1 |
20100062870 | Pouliot | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075775 | Silvestre Monteiro | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100317451 | Stites | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20140315653 | Wong | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150119160 | Franklin | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20170036094 | Kim | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20230405417 | Greaney | Dec 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2554482 | Apr 2018 | GB |