Patent Grant
10095881
Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to a system and method for providing various levels of permissions to data stored in a database, and more particularly, to a system and method for providing view-based or query-based permissions to the data.
In a typical database management system, a user's permission to access data is typically granted by a database administrator at the level of data structures (e.g., specific tables, fields, classes or data types). Specific instances of data in those structures typically inherit the permission of their respective structures. Due to this approach, permission to access data is granted at the coarse grain of the data structures (e.g., access control is granted to all data of a particular data type), without regard to the specific instances of data stored in the structures, thus forcing the access control provision to be an all-or-nothing approach. Further problems arise for those creating reports that mix data from a variety of structures. To ensure that a user who executes a report sees what the report creator intends for the user to see, the report creator must be aware of the different data structures included in the report and is forced to provide the user permission to access to the data structures one at a time. When a report is created for multiple users, the report creator must grant permission to each user for each data structure. Thus, the burden on the report creator to provide permission to access the data in the report greatly increases with the increase in the number of users.
While the appended claims set forth the features of the present techniques with particularity, these techniques may be best understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
Various embodiments of the disclosure provide a system and methods where permission to access data is provided via database queries. More specifically, when a query creator grants a user or a group of users permission to access and/or execute a query, the system and methods disclosed herein automatically provide the user or the group of users the appropriate permission to access the resultant data set of the query. Furthermore, in an embodiment, the system and methods may generate a data view or data subset specific to a user, where the user-specific data view or the user-specific data subset includes only data from the database that is accessible to the user. Further, the effort demanded of the query creator to provide users permission to access data is relatively constant regardless of the number of data structures or data elements returned by the queries.
Various embodiments of the disclosure are implemented in a computer networking environment. Turning to
In another embodiment, the productivity software 101 and the SaaS platform software 107 are executed on the same computing device (e.g., the first computing device 100 or the third computing device 106). For example, the productivity software 101 resides on one partition of the first computing device 100 while the SaaS platform software 107 resides on another partition of the first computing device 100. In other embodiments, portions of the productivity software 101 may be executed on both the first computing device 100 and the third computing device 106, and/or portions of the SaaS platform software 107 may be executed on both the first computing device 100 and the third computing device 106. With such network configurations, the second computing device 104 is configured to access the computing device or devices on which the productivity software 101 resides.
In one implementation, one or more of the computing devices of
The memories 204 and 206 store instructions executable by the processor 202 and data. In some embodiments, the secondary memory 206 is implemented as, or supplemented by an external memory 206A. The media storage device 108 is a possible implementation of the external memory 206A. The processor 202 executes the instructions and uses the data to carry out various procedures including, in some embodiments, the methods described herein, including displaying a graphical user interface 219. The graphical user interface 219 is, according to one embodiment, software that the processor 202 executes to display a report on the display device 210, and which permits a user to make inputs into the report via the user input devices 208.
Referring to
In an embodiment, a data vertex or a data node may be assigned a type. In
In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, the vertex properties may be standardized across all instances of data vertices of the same type. In
Two data vertices are said to have a semantic relationship if there is a meaningful link defined between them within the database. In a graph database, two data vertices are semantically related if one data vertex can be reached by traversing the graph database starting at the other data vertex. For example, in the database 300, the PERSON vertex 304 and the INVOICE vertex 310 are semantically related, and the semantic relationship is represented by a Sold/SoldBy edge 330 which connects the PERSON vertex 304 with the INVOICE vertex 310. In other embodiments, two data vertices may be semantically related even if they are not directly connected via an edge (e.g., there are one or more edges and/or data vertices between the two data vertices), as long as one data vertex can be reached by traversing the database from the other data vertex in accordance with a query operation.
In an embodiment, the interpretation of an edge is dependent upon the traversal direction between data vertices in a database. For instance, when traversing from the PERSON vertex 304 to the INVOICE vertex 310, the Sold/SoldBy edge 330 is interpreted as “Sold”, i.e., user1 of the PERSON vertex 304 sold invoice i001 of the INVOICE vertex 310. On the other hand, when traversing from the INVOICE vertex 310 to the PERSON vertex 304, the Sold/SoldBy edge 330 is interpreted as “SoldBy”, i.e., invoice i001 of the INVOICE vertex 310 is sold by user1 of PERSON vertex 304. In an embodiment, the traversal direction of the edge may be specified in the query. In other embodiments, the system is configured to automatically determine the traversal direction based on the selected data vertices and edges.
In another embodiment, unlike the Sold/SoldBy edge 330 (which is a symmetrical or bidirectional edge), an edge may be unidirectional. For instance, the Sold/SoldBy edge 330 may be represented by two unidirectional edges: a Sold edge that begins at the PERSON vertex 304 and ends at the INVOICE vertex 310, and a SoldBy edge that begins at the INVOICE vertex 310 and ends at the PERSON vertex 304. The use of a bidirectional edge or a unidirectional edge is implementation dependent.
Referring to
The database 300 also includes two QUERY vertices 320 and 322.
In the database 300, a query includes a traversal clause or a selection clause, which defines a traversal pattern and is used to identify the specific data vertices for inclusion in the resultant data set when the query is executed. Optionally, the query may include property clauses, which are used to identify properties of the specific vertices included in the resultant data set. For example, the QUERY vertex 320 contains query1, which is a query having a traversal or selection clause of “PERSON(P)<SoldBy(I)INVOICE”. An interpretation of query1 of the QUERY vertex 320 is to select all data in the database 300 that match the traversal clause of query1, e.g., all the PERSON vertices that are related to an INVOICE vertex via a Sold/SoldBy edge (or all INVOICE vertices that are related to an PERSON vertex via a Sold/SoldBy edge). Query1 also include three property clauses: “(P).sname” for the “sname” property in each selected PERSON vertex, “(I).number” for the “number” property in each selected INVOICE vertex, and “(I).amount” for the “amount” property in each selected INVOICE node.
Unlike query1, query2 of the QUERY vertex 322 is a user-centric query. As used herein, a user-centric query is a query for data that is semantically related to and matches the query-defined traversal pattern with respect to a particular piece of data. In the embodiment shown in
In more detail, query2 of the QUERY vertex 322 has a traversal clause of “@me(P)<SoldBy(I)INVOICE”. An interpretation of query2 of the QUERY vertex 322 is to select the specific PERSON vertex that corresponds to the user executing query2, and to select all INVOICE vertices that are related to the selected PERSON vertex via a SoldBy edge. Query2 also includes two property clauses: “(P).sname” for the “sname” property in the selected PERSON vertex, and “(I).number” for the “number” property in each selected INVOICE vertex. In query2, the user-centric query is represented using the “@me” syntax, which indicates the specific PERSON vertex corresponding to the user who is executing the query. Advantageously, a single user-centric query can provide customized results, e.g., the results of query2 varies based on the user executing query2. Although “@me” is a syntax chosen in the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the database 300, user1 of the PERSON vertex 302 has the permission type of “Own” with respect to query1 of the QUERY vertex 320 and query2 of the QUERY vertex 322, as indicated by the Own edge 340 and the Own edge 344 respectively. On the other hand, user2 of the PERSON vertex 304 has the permission type of “View” with respect to query1 of the QUERY vertex 320 and the permission type of “Edit” with respect to query2 of the QUERY vertex 322, as indicated by the View edge 342 and the Edit edge 346 respectively. User3 of the PERSON vertex 306 has the permission type of “View” with respect to query2 of the QUERY vertex 322, as indicated by the View edge 348.
As discussed previously, user1 of the PERSON vertex 302 is the administrator of the database 300 and has access to all data vertices and edges in the database 300. In addition, when user1 creates query1 and query2, the Own edges 340 and 344 connect the PERSON vertex 302 with the QUERY vertices 320 and 322 respectively. As the owner of the queries, user1 can grant other users (e.g., user2 of PERSON vertex 304 and user3 of PERSON vertex 306) permission or access to the queries in the QUERY vertices 320 and 322 and the corresponding resultant data sets. In other embodiments, however, a user other than the database administrator may be an owner or a creator of a query.
When query1 of the QUERY vertex 320 is executed on behalf of user1, an example of the resultant data set available to user1 is shown in TABLE 1 below. Although TABLE 1 displays the type of permission user1 has with respect to the resultant data set (“Own”), in another embodiment, the permission type may be hidden.
When user1 shares query1 with user2 with a “View” permission, the View edge 342 is created between the PERSON vertex 304 (corresponding to user2) and the QUERY vertex 320 (containing query1). When query1 is executed on behalf of user2, an example of the resultant data set available to user2 is shown in TABLE 2 below. The resultant data set of a query is dependent on the data accessible to the user who executes the query. Here, TABLE 2 displays the same data as TABLE 1. However, the type of permission shown in TABLE 2 (“View”) is different from that shown in TABLE 1 (“Own”), since user2 only has the “View” permission with respect to the resultant data set of query1. In an embodiment, unlike user1, user2 can only view the data shown in TABLE 2 but cannot modify any of the data.
Referring to
Unlike query1, query2 of the QUERY vertex 322 is a user-centric query, which requests for data that has a semantic relationship with and matches the query-defined traversal pattern with respect to the data vertex corresponding to the user executing the query. When query2 is executed on behalf of user1, no resultant data set would be returned, since no INVOICE vertices and no Sold/SoldBy edges matches the traversal pattern specified by query2 (i.e., no INVOICE vertex is connected or related to the PERSON vertex 302 (corresponding to user1) via a Sold/SoldBy edge).
When user1 shares query2 with user2 with an “Edit” permission, the Edit edge 346 is created between the PERSON vertex 304 (corresponding to user2) and the QUERY vertex 322 (containing query2). When query2 is executed on behalf of user2, an example of the resultant data set available to user2 is shown in TABLE 3 below. Because query2 is a user-centric query, when query2 is executed on behalf of user2, the resultant data set includes only the PERSON vertex 304 and the INVOICE vertices 310, 312, and 316. The PERSON vertex 304 is returned because it is the PERSON vertex that corresponds to user2, the query executor. The INVOICE vertices 310, 312, and 316 are returned because they are the only INVOICE vertices that are connected to the PERSON vertex 304 via a Sold/SoldBy edge. In addition, TABLE 3 displays user2's permission with respect to the resultant data set as “Edit”, indicating that user2 is permitted to modify, in addition to view, the data shown in TABLE 3.
When user1 shares query2 with user3 with a “View” permission, the View edge 348 is created between the PERSON vertex 306 (corresponding to user3) and the QUERY vertex 322 (containing query2). When query2 is executed on behalf of user3, an example of the resultant data set available to user3 is shown in TABLE 4 below. Because query2 is a user-centric query, when query2 is executed on behalf of user3, the resultant data set includes only the PERSON vertex 306 and the INVOICE vertices 314 and 316. The PERSON vertex 306 is returned because it is the PERSON vertex that corresponds to user3, the query executor. The INVOICE vertices 314 and 316 are returned because they are the only INVOICE vertices that are connected to the PERSON vertex 306 via a Sold/SoldBy edge. In addition, TABLE 4 displays user3's permission with respect to the resultant data set as “View”, indicating that user3 is permitted to only view the data shown in TABLE 4 but cannot modify the data.
As TABLES 3 and 4 illustrate, the resultant data set of a user-centric query is dependent upon the identity of the user on behalf of whom the query is executed. In other words, via the user-centric query, a user executing the query sees only data that has a semantic relationship with and matches the query-defined traversal pattern with respect to the datum representing the user. The user-centric query enables a query creator to create a single query that can be executed by multiple users, yet when the query is executed, each user sees only data that is accessible to that particular user. Thus, there is no need for the query creator to create a unique query for each user individually.
In another embodiment, a user-specific data subset can be generated from the database to allow the user to interact with the data accessible to the user independent from other users. In an embodiment, a user-specific data subset is a copy of a portion of the database and may be temporarily stored in memory. The user-specific data subset is generated based on queries shared with or accessible to the user, and the user-specific data subset is populated with data from the resultant data sets of the queries.
In an alternative implementation, the user-specific data subset includes references to data in the database that are accessible to the user. The user-specific data subset is generated based on queries shared with or accessible to the user, and the user-specific data subset is populated with references to data from the resultant data sets of the queries. For example, the user-specific data subset may contain pointers to the data in the database that are accessible to the user.
In more detail, in
Furthermore, the user-specific data subset 400 includes the QUERY vertices 320 and 322 as well as the View edge 342 and the Edit edge 346. The View edge 342 indicates that user2 has permission to “View” the resultant data set of query1, and the Edit edge 346 indicates that user2 has the permission to “Edit” the resultant data set of query2. Because the resultant data sets of query1 and query2 overlap, as both data sets include the PERSON vertex 304, the INVOICE vertices 310, 312, and 316, and the Sold/SoldBy edges 330, 332, and 336, user2 is granted different types of permission with respect to these pieces of data (i.e., “View” through query1 vs. “Edit” through query2). To resolve such permission conflict, in an embodiment, user2 is granted the more permissive type of permission with respect to these pieces of data (i.e., “Edit”). In another embodiment, user2 is granted the less permissive or more restrictive type of permission with respect to these data (i.e., “View”). In still other embodiments, a user may be granted two or more different types of permission or access to a particular piece of data, and the combination of these types of permission would be applied to the user's interaction with that piece of data.
In another embodiment, the user-specific data subset 400 contains references or pointers to the data from the database 300 that are accessible to user2. For example, instead of populating the data subset 400 with copies of data from the database 300, the data subset 400 is populated with references or pointers to the data vertices and/or edges of the resultant dataset of the queries. The data subset 400 may be further populated with references or pointers to the queries shared with or accessible to user2.
In another implementation, the user-specific data subset 402 is populated with references or pointers to the data vertices and/or edges of the resultant dataset of the queries accessible to user3. The data subset 402 may be further populated with references or pointers to the queries shared with or accessible to user3.
In an embodiment, a user-specific data subset generated for user1 contains all the data in the database 300 of
Because a user-specific data subset is generated for each authenticated user, each user may interact with the data in his or her user-specific data subset independently from other users. In some embodiments, a user can generate new queries that select only data or references in that user's user-specific data subset. In an embodiment, the user can share the generated new queries to other users. In another embodiment, the user may grant other users various types of permission to access the generated new queries and the resultant data set of the new queries. Furthermore, in another embodiment, the server is configured to generate any number of user-specific data subsets (e.g., generate the user-specific data subset for all users having access to the database) without identifying or authenticating the identity of a user.
In another embodiment, it is desirable to allow a user to view the resultant data set of a query without populating the user's user-specific data subset with the data in the resultant data set or references to the data in the resultant data set.
Unlike the database 300 of
In an embodiment, the Execute edge represents a “run-as-query-creator” mode. The “run-as-query-creator” mode allows a query creator to share a query with another user without populating the other user's user-specific data subset with data in the resultant data set of the query. When a query is executed in the “run-as-query-creator” mode, the query is executed using data that are accessible to the query creator (e.g., the data in the query creator's user-specific data subset), but not using the data that are accessible to the user who is executing the query (e.g., using the data in the user's user-specific data subset which may be different from the data accessible to the query creator). This mode is useful when a query creator wishes to provide the user a read-only report of some of the data that is accessible to the query creator. The “run-as-query-creator” mode is further discussed with respect to
In an embodiment, when a user executes a query in the “run-as-the-query-creator” mode, the server executes the query not in the data subset of the user but in the data subset of the query creator. For instance, when user2 executes query1 in the “run-as-query-creator” mode, the server executes query1 in the user-specific data subset of user1, who is the creator of query1, but not in user2's user-specific data subset 600. As the administrator of the database 500, user1's user-specific data subset contains the same data (or references to the data) as the database 500. After executing query1 in the data subset of user1, the server is configured to generate a report of the resultant data set and to display the generated report to user2. An example of the generated report for user2 when query1 is executed in the “run-as-query-creator” mode is shown in TABLE 5 below.
Furthermore, query1 of the QUERY vertex 320 includes the “sname” property of PERSON vertices and the “number” and “amount” properties of INVOICE vertices, but does not include the “fname” property of PERSON vertices. In an embodiment, the generated report for user2 would display only the properties that were explicitly identified in the query, such as the properties shown in TABLE 5 above.
In an embodiment, when user3 executes query2 in the “run-as-query-creator” mode, the server executes query2 in the data subset of user1 because user1 is the query creator, and user1's user-specific data subset includes the same data as the database 500. After executing query2 in user1's data subset, the server is configured to generate a report of the resultant data set and to display the generated report to user3.
However, in the embodiments shown in
Furthermore, in the “run-as-query-creator” mode, a user may delegate to another user the authority to share a query in the “run-as-query-creator” mode. For example, user1 is the owner and creator of a query. User1 shares the query with user2 via the “run-as-query-creator” mode. User1 also delegates to user2 the authority to share the query with user3, but only via the “run-as-query-creator” mode. When user2 executes the query, the query is executed using user1's data subset and no change is made to user2's data subset. Likewise, when user3 executes the query, the query is executed using user1's data subset and no change is made to user3's data subset. This approach allows user2 and user3 to view the report as user1 would view it. Put in another way, this approach enables user1 to delegate to user2 the right to distribute view-only reports (using data in user1's data subset) to other users, without populating the other user's data subsets with the underlying data. In a further embodiment, user1 may delegate to user2 the right to delegate to user3 the right to share the query with user4.
In various embodiments, permission or access to data can be granted at the property or edge level, in addition to being granted at the data vertex level.
The user-specific data subset 700 of user2 includes two QUERY vertices 720 and 722. The QUERY vertex 720 includes query3, which is a query having a traversal clause of “PERSON(P)<SoldBy(I)INVOICE”. An interpretation of query3 is to select all the PERSON vertices and INVOICE vertices that are related to each other via a Sold/SoldBy edge. Query3 also include two property clauses: “(P).sname” for the “sname” property in each selected PERSON vertex, and “(I).number” for the “number” property in each selected INVOICE vertex. Furthermore, the QUERY vertex 720 is semantically related to the PERSON vertex 304 (corresponding to user2) via the View edge 342. When the server executes query3 of the QUERY vertex 720, user2 is granted the “View” permission to the resultant data set of query3.
Also in the user-specific data subset 700, the QUERY vertex 722 includes query4, which is a user-centric query having a traversal clause of “@me(P)<SoldBy(I)INVOICE”. An interpretation of query4 is to select the specific PERSON vertex that corresponds to the user executing query4, and to select all INVOICE vertices that are related to the selected PERSON vertex via a Sold/SoldBy edge. Query4 also includes two property clauses: “(P).sname” for the “sname” property in the selected PERSON vertex, and “(I).amount” for the “amount” property in each selected INVOICE vertex. In addition, the QUERY vertex 722 is related to the PERSON vertex 304 via the Edit edge 346. When the server executes query4 of the QUERY vertex 722, user2 is granted the “Edit” permission to the resultant data set of query4.
However, query4 of the QUERY vertex 722 further includes a property permission clause 750 of “view” following the property clause “(I).amount”. An interpretation of the property permission clause 750 is that a user can “view” the value of the “amount” property in each selected INVOICE vertex. The “view” permission for the “(I).amount” property granted the property permission clause 750 thus conflicts with the “Edit” permission granted by the Edit edge 346. In an embodiment, the permission granted to the specific property overrides the permission granted to the query. In
In addition, when query3 and query4 are both executed (e.g., to generate the user-specific data subset 700 for user2), the resultant data sets of the two queries partially overlap, as both data sets include the PERSON vertex 304, the INVOICE vertices 310, 312, and 316, and the Sold/SoldBy edges 330, 332, and 336 in
In TABLE 7, a “( )” indicates that the data value is view-only, while the data values without a “( )” are editable. In the “PERSON.sname” column, user2 is granted permission to “Edit” his own surname through the user-centric query query4 of the QUERY vertex 722 and the Edit edge 346. User2 is granted permission to only “View” the surname of user3 through the query3 of the QUERY vertex 720 and the View edge 346, since the surname of user3 is only included in the resultant data set of query3 but not query4. In the “INVOICE.number” column, user2 is granted permission to “View” the invoice number through query3 of the QUERY vertex 720 and the View edge 346. In the “INVOICE.amount” column, user2 is granted permission to “view” the invoice amount through query4 of the QUERY vertex 722 and the property permission clause 750. In TABLE 7, no data is displayed in the “INVOICE.amount” for user3's invoices, because neither query3 nor query4 includes the data corresponding to user3's invoice amounts. In another embodiment, however, user3's invoice amounts may be displayed as view-only because user2 is granted permission to “View” the INVOICE vertices related to the PERSON node corresponding to user3 via query3.
In addition to granting permissions to specific properties of data, the server is also configured to grant permission to edges. For example, query3 can be modified to further include an edge clause “(I)@edge: write”. An interpretation of the edge clause is that a user is granted the permission to “create” and/or “delete” Sold/SoldBy edges that relate the selected PERSON vertices and the selected INVOICE vertices included in the resultant data set of query3. For example, the above edge clause grants user2 the permission to create a Sold/SoldBy edge between the PERSON vertex 306 and the INVOICE vertex 310. Similarly, a user may be granted permission to create and/or delete data vertices. In an embodiment, user2 of the PERSON vertex 304 may be granted the permission to create a new INVOICE vertex. When user2 is granted the permission to “write” a new edge and the permission to “write” a new data vertex, in an embodiment, user2 is able to create a new INVOICE vertex and the corresponding Sold/SoldBy edge to the newly created INVOICE vertex.
In various embodiments, when a user modifies data (e.g., edits a piece of existing data or creating a piece of new data), the server is configured to update the main database with the modified data and then regenerate the user-specific data subset of that user and any other user-specific data subset that is affected by the modified data. In some embodiments, only a portion of the user-specific data subset affected by the changed data is regenerated. In another embodiment, the user-specific data subset is modified with the changed data but not regenerated.
When a database administrator creates a user-centric query, the query creator may wish to preview the data that is accessible to various users when the query is executed on behalf of each user.
In the embodiments shown in
In another embodiment, the types of permissions or access controls may include a permission expiration date or a time period for which the permission is to remain valid. For example, a user may be granted permission to view the data in the results data set for a predefined time period (e.g., 30 days). As another example, a user may be granted permission to edit the data until the end of a quarter (e.g., on or before December 31). When the predefined time period is over or when the permission expiration date is reached, the type of permission granted to the user may be rescinded (e.g., the user can no longer view the data) or changed (e.g., the user can no longer edit the data but can still view the data).
For example,
In more detail, the process 1000 is an example technique for executing a user-centric query. In an embodiment, at 1002, a computing device (e.g., a hardware server such as the first computing device 100 or the third computing device 106, or a processor such as the processor 202) is configured to generate a database query. In an embodiment, the computing device is configured to generate the database query in response to a request from a user or a query creator. Once the query is generated, the computing device is configured to store the query in the same database that stores the data, in a separate partition of the database, or in a location that is separate from the database.
At 1004, the computing device is configured to receive a first request to execute the database query on behalf of a first user. In an embodiment, the first request is a request sent by the first user to execute the database query. In another embodiment, the first request is a request generated by the computing device after the first user's log-in credential or identity is authenticated. In still other embodiments, the first request is a request generated by the computing device after certain user information is recognized or verified.
In response to the first request, at 1006, the computing device is configured to execute the database query to generate a first set of results such that the first set of results is limited to data with which there is a semantic relationship in the database to a first datum representing the first user. As used herein, a datum is a piece of data included in a database. Non-limiting examples of a datum include a data vertex or a data node in a graph database, an edge in a graph database, or a field or a record in a relational database. Referring to
At 1010 of the process 1000, the computing device is configured to receive a second request to execute the database query on behalf of a second user. In an embodiment, the second request is a request sent by the second user to execute the database query. In another embodiment, the second request is a request generated by the computing device after the second user's log-in credential or identity is authenticated. In still other embodiments, the second request is a request generated by the computing device after certain user information is recognized or verified.
Then at 1012, in response to the second request, the computing device is configured to execute the database query to generate a second set of results such that the second set of results is limited to data with which there is a semantic relationship in the database to a second datum representing the second user. As the database query in the process 1000 is a user-centric query, the first set of results (i.e., results of the query executed on behalf of the first user) and the second set of results (i.e., results of the query executed on behalf of the second user) are at least partially non-overlapping. At 1014, the computing device is configured to display, to the second user, the second set of results of the database query executed in response to the second request.
In an embodiment, the database query is generated and executed using a graph database. Accordingly, the computing device is configured to execute the database query such that the first set of results is limited to one or more data nodes in the database that can be reached by traversing from the first datum. The computing device is also configured to execute the database query such that the second set of results is limited to one or more data nodes in the database that can be reached by traversing from the second datum.
In another embodiment, to display the first set of the results to the first user, the computing device is configured to transmit a first report that includes the first set of results to a first computing device for display to the first user. To display the second set of results to the second user, the computing device is configured to transmit a second report that includes the second set of results to a second computing device for display to the second user.
In still another embodiment, the computing device is configured to grant, to the first user a first type of permission (e.g., own) to access the database query. When the database query is executed in response to the first request, the computing device is configured to grant, to the first user, the first type of permission (e.g., own) to access data included in the first set of the results. In other words, the computing device is configured to grant, to the first user, the same type of permission to access the database query and the first set of results.
In yet another embodiment, the computing device is configured to grant, to the second user, a second type of permission (e.g., view or edit) to access the database query. When the database query is executed in response to the second request, the computing device is configured to grant, to the second user, the second type of permission (e.g., view or edit) to access data included in the second set of results. In other words, the computing device is configured to grant, to the second user, the same type of permission to access both the database query and the second set of results.
The process 1100 is an example technique that allows a user to execute the query as another user (e.g., the “run-as-query-creator” mode discussed previously). In an embodiment, at 1102, a computing device (e.g., a hardware server such as the first computing device 100 or the third computing device 106, or a processor such as the processor 202) is configured to generate a database query. At 1104, the computing device is configured to receive, from a first user, an indication that the database query is to be shared with a second user. For example, referring to
At 1006, the computing device is configured to receive a request to execute the database query on behalf of the second user. In response to the request, the computing device is configured to execute the database query on behalf of the second user to generate a set of results such that the set of results is limited to data in the database that is accessible to the first user. The set of results includes at least some data in the database that was not accessible to the second user before the database query is executed in response to the request. Then at 1110, the computing device is configured to display the set of results to the second user.
In an embodiment, to display the set of results to the second user, the computing device is configured to transmit a report that includes the set of results to a second computing device for display to the second user.
In some embodiments, the set of results is limited to data with which there is a semantic relationship in the database to a first datum representing the first user.
In another embodiment, the computing device is configured to grant, to the first user, a first type of permission (e.g., own) to access the database query. The computing device is then configured to execute the database query on behalf of the first user. After executing the database query on behalf of the first user, the computing device is configured to grant, to the first user, the first type of permission (e.g., own) to access data included in the results of the database query.
In yet another embodiment, after receiving, from the first user, the indication that the database query is to be shared with the second user, the computing device is configured to grant, to the second user, a second type of permission (e.g., view) to access the database query. After executing the database query on behalf of the second user, the computing device is configured to grant, to the second user, the second type of permission (e.g., view) to access data included in the set of results.
In still another embodiment, after receiving, from the first user, the indication that the database query is to be shared with the second user, the computing device is configured to grant, to the second user, a second type of permission (e.g., execute) to access the database query. After executing the database query on behalf of the second user, the computing device is configured to grant, to the second user, permission to execute the database query using data accessible to the first user.
The process 1200 illustrates an example technique for generating a user-specific data subset (e.g., the user-specific data subset 400 for user2 of
Then at 1206, the computing device is configured to identify, from the database, a data subset specific to the user. To identify the data subset, the computing device is configured to execute the database query on behalf of the user using data in the database to generate a set of results at 1208. Then, at 1210, the computing device is configured to grant, to the user, access to data included in the set of results. At 1212, the computing device is configured to receive a request to execute the database query on behalf of the user. In response to the request to execute the database query on behalf of the user, at 1214, the computing device is configured to execute the database query using only data in the data subset to generate a report. Then at 1216, the computing device is configured to display the report to the user. As discussed previously, the data subset specific to the user allows the user to interact with data that are accessible to the user independent of other users.
In some embodiments, the computing device is configured to identify the data subset by including, in the data subset, the data included in the set of results and the database query. In other embodiments, the computing device is configured to identify the data subset by including, in the data subset, a reference to the data included in the set of results and a reference to the database query. The computing device may further store the data subset in memory.
In an embodiment, when executing the database query using data in the database, the computing device is configured to execute the database query such that the set of results is limited to data with which there is a semantic relationship in the database to a datum representing the user.
In another embodiment, the computing device is configured to grant, to the user, a first type of permission to access to the database query. The computing device is further configured to grant, to the user, the first type of permission to access the data included in the set of results.
In still another embodiment, the computing device is configured to receive a request to modify data. Then, the computing device is configured to update the database to include the modified data. The computing device is further configured to determine whether the request to modify data affects or modifies any data in the data subset. Based on a determination that the request to modify data would modify data in the data subset, the computing device is configured to regenerate the data subset to include the modified data.
In yet another embodiment, the computing device is configured to grant, to a second user, access to the database query. The computing device is then configured to identify, from the database, a second data subset specific to the second user. To identify the second data subset, the computing device is configured to execute the database query, on behalf of the second user, using data in the database to generate a second set of results. The computing device is also configured to grant, to the second user, access to data included in the second set of results. Then, the computing device is configured to receive a request to execute the database query on behalf of the second user. In response to the request to execute the database query on behalf of the second user, the computing device is configured to execute the database query using only data in the second data subset.
In some embodiments, the computing device is configured to identify the second data subset by including, in the second data subset, the data included in the second set of results and the database query. In other embodiments, the computing device is configured to identify the second data subset by including, in the second data subset, a reference to the data included in the second set of results and a reference to the database query. The computing device is configured to store the second data subset in the memory to be separate from the data subset.
In an embodiment, the computing device is configured to receive, from the user, an indication that the database query is to be shared with the second user. Then, the computing device is configured to receive a request to execute the database query on behalf of the second user. In response to the request from the second user, the computing device is configured to execute the database query such that it is limited to data in the data subset specific to the user.
The process 1300 is an example technique for resolving permission conflicts between queries. At 1302, a computing device (e.g., a hardware server such as the first computing device 100 or the third computing device 106, or a processor such as the processor 202) is configured to generate a first database query. At 1304, the computing device is configured to grant, to a user, a first type of permission to execute the first database query. At 1306, the computing device is configured to generate a second database query. Then at 1308, the computing device is configured to grant, to the user, a second type of permission to execute the second database query.
At 1310, the computing device is configured to execute the first database query to generate a first set of results. Then at 1312, the computing device is configured to execute the second database query to generate a second set of results, where the second set of results and the first set of results share one or more overlapping data. For the overlapping data, the computing device is configured to compare the first type of permission with the second type of permission, at 1314. At 1316, based on a result of the comparison, the computing device is configured to grant, to the user, either the first type of permission or the second type of permission to access the overlapping data.
In various embodiments, the first type of permission is different from the second type of permission. In an embodiment, the first type of permission (e.g., edit) is more permissive than the second type of permission (e.g., view). In another embodiment, the first type of permission is more restrictive (e.g., edit) than the second type of permission (e.g., own).
In an embodiment, the computing device is configured to determine whether the first type of permission is more permissive than the second type of permission. The computing device is configured to grant, to the user, the first type of permission to access the overlapping data if the first type of permission is more permissive. The computing device is further configured to grant, to the user, the second type of permission to access the overlapping data if the second type of permission is more permissive.
In another embodiment, the computing device is configured to determine whether the first type of permission is more restrictive than the second type of permission. If the first type of permission is more restrictive, the computing device is configured to grant, to the user, the first type of permission to access the overlapping data. If the second type of permission is more restrictive, the computing device is configured to grant, to the user, the second type of permission to access the overlapping data.
Furthermore, the computing device is configured to grant, to the user, the first type of permission to access the remaining data in the first set of results. The computing device is also configured to grant, to the user, the second type of permission to access the remaining data in the second set of results.
The computing device is further configured to generate a data subset specific to the user. In an embodiment, the data subset includes the overlapping data, the remaining data in the first set of results, the remaining data in the second set of results, the first database query, the second database query, the first type of permission, and the second type of permission. In another embodiment, the data subset includes a reference to the overlapping data, a reference to the remaining data in the first set of results, a reference to the remaining data in the second set of results, a reference to the first database query, a reference to the second database query, a reference to the first type of permission, and a reference to the second type of permission.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference has been made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language has been used to describe these embodiments. However, no limitation of the scope of the invention is intended by this specific language, and the invention should be construed to encompass all embodiments that would normally occur to one of ordinary skill in the art. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing the particular embodiments and is not intended to be limiting of exemplary embodiments of the invention. In the description of the embodiments, certain detailed explanations of related art are omitted when it is deemed that they may unnecessarily obscure the essence of the invention.
The apparatus described herein may comprise a processor, a memory for storing program data to be executed by the processor, a permanent storage such as a disk drive, a communications port for handling communications with external devices, and user interface devices, including a display, touch panel, keys, buttons, etc. When software modules are involved, these software modules may be stored as program instructions or computer readable code executable by the processor on a non-transitory computer-readable media such as magnetic storage media (e.g., magnetic tapes, hard disks, floppy disks), optical recording media (e.g., CD-ROMs, Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), etc.), and solid state memory (e.g., random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), static random-access memory (SRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, thumb drives, etc.). The computer readable recording media may also be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion. This computer readable recording media may be read by the computer, stored in the memory, and executed by the processor.
Also, using the disclosure herein, programmers of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains may easily implement functional programs, codes, and code segments for making and using the invention.
The invention may be described in terms of functional block components and various processing steps. Such functional blocks may be realized by any number of hardware and/or software components configured to perform the specified functions. For example, the invention may employ various integrated circuit components, e.g., memory elements, processing elements, logic elements, look-up tables, and the like, which may carry out a variety of functions under the control of one or more microprocessors or other control devices. Similarly, where the elements of the invention are implemented using software programming or software elements, the invention may be implemented with any programming or scripting language such as C, C++, JAVA®, assembler, or the like, with the various algorithms being implemented with any combination of data structures, objects, processes, routines or other programming elements. Functional aspects may be implemented in algorithms that execute on one or more processors. Furthermore, the invention may employ any number of conventional techniques for electronics configuration, signal processing and/or control, data processing and the like. Finally, the steps of all methods described herein may be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
For the sake of brevity, conventional electronics, control systems, software development and other functional aspects of the systems (and components of the individual operating components of the systems) may not be described in detail. Furthermore, the connecting lines, or connectors shown in the various figures presented are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical or logical couplings between the various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships, physical connections or logical connections may be present in a practical device. The words “mechanism”, “element”, “unit”, “structure”, “means”, and “construction” are used broadly and are not limited to mechanical or physical embodiments, but may include software routines in conjunction with processors, etc.
The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. Numerous modifications and adaptations will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in this art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims. Therefore, the scope of the invention is defined not by the detailed description of the invention but by the following claims, and all differences within the scope will be construed as being included in the invention.
No item or component is essential to the practice of the invention unless the element is specifically described as “essential” or “critical”. It will also be recognized that the terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes”, “including”, “has”, and “having”, as used herein, are specifically intended to be read as open-ended terms of art. The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. In addition, it should be understood that although the terms “first”, “second”, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms, which are only used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/159,340, filed on May 19, 2016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,692,764), which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/296,862, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING VIEW-BASED PERMISSIONS TO DATA,” filed on Feb. 18, 2016. The disclosures of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5862325 | Reed et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 6038563 | Bapat et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 7039871 | Cronk | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7076736 | Hugh | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7181017 | Nagel et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 8495663 | Tien et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8615528 | Shah | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8798519 | Dozier et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9348947 | Stetson et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 20030227487 | Hugh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20130117060 | Henriksen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20140129511 | Bramel et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140373176 | Arning et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20160140205 | Hsu et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Adaikkalavan et al., “Secure Shared Continuous Query Processing,” ACM SAC'11, 2011, pp. 1000-1005. |
| Luo et al., “LAYER: A cost-efficient mechanism to support multi-tenant database as a service in cloud,” The Journal of Systems and Software, Dec. 2, 2014, vol. 101, pp. 86-96. |
| Microsoft Corporation, “Microsoft Project Server 2010 Administrator's Guide,” retrieved from internet at <http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=212382>, 2011, 302 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170272443 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62296862 | Feb 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15159340 | May 2016 | US |
| Child | 15613911 | US |
