The present invention relates generally to surface prepping and, in particular, to prepping surfaces using abrasive particles (or blasting particles) entrained into a continuous or pulsed waterjet or airjet.
Prior to applying a coating to a surface, it is generally necessary to prep the surface to ensure that the surface has the appropriate surface roughness. Prepping the surface is often accomplished using grit blasting (e.g. using cast iron shot or aluminum oxide) or by using an abrasive-entrained fluid. A variety of abrasives are known in the art, for example, sand, garnet, Zeolite (which are aluminosilicates of sodium, potassium, calcium or magnesium), alumina, and grit (i.e. crushed ferrous or synthetic abrasives). These abrasive particles (herein referred to as “blasting particles”) can be used to prep a surface, be it metallic or non-metallic, to a desired surface roughness.
Once the prepping of the surface is complete, coating material, which may be in the form of coating particles, is applied to the prepped surface. Coating particles can be applied using various techniques such as, for example, thermal spray coating (including combustion powder flame spray and High Velocity Oxy-Fuel), plasma spray, cold spray, etc.
Once the surface prepping is complete, the surface may need to be cleaned or washed, either by rinsing or other such method to remove the blasting particles that may remain on the surface to be coated. In many cases, this is accepted as satisfactory. However, there are many instances where the particles regularly used for blasting become embedded in the atomic matrix of the surface to be coated. This is highly undesirable as even a single foreign particle may adversely affect the micro-structural properties of the surface to be coated. For instance, when the surface is coated with the high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) process using metallic particles such as tungsten, the coating particles will not adhere to the surface at the location where the foreign particle is embedded. Thus, the point where the particle resides may become a point of weakness of the surface, and in service may lead to unpredictable behaviour, including catastrophic failure.
An improvement on this conventional prepping process would thus be highly desirable.
The present invention provides a novel method and apparatus that eliminates the problems associated with the use of foreign blasting particles for surface prepping. The problems associated with the prior art are overcome by using the coating particle as a blasting particle (or abrasive particle) for prepping the surface to be coated. In other words, the surface prepping of a component is done using the same coating particle that is to be used to coat the surface of the component.
This invention will not only eliminate the problem of embedding a foreign particle into the surface to be coated, but also offers many other advantages leading to considerable savings in cost and in the abatement of pollution.
For example, in the high velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) coating technique, tungsten carbide is one of the particles used for coating a surface by entraining and propelling the particle in the flame jet produced by combustion of volatile liquids such as kerosene in oxygen/air. The same system can be used for prepping the surface using tungsten carbide particles without combustion. In other words, in the first stage, the surface to be coated is prepped with tungsten carbide particles. In the second stage, the same particles are used in the flame for coating the surface. Since the same particles are used for both prepping and coating, the problem of disposing of the conventional grit-blast particles is totally eliminated. Furthermore, as cleaning the blasted surface is not required, additional savings in time and cost will be achieved. Moreover, the novel process produces less pollution as disposal of waste products is eliminated altogether since blasting particles that do not adhere may be recycled and reused for coating. The same methodology applies in other coating techniques such as the plasma coating technique. In other words, the coating particles used as blasting particles for prepping the surface can be entrained in high-speed fluid jets. A further improvement in the prepping technique can be achieved by entraining the coating particles in continuous or pulsed waterjet or in continuous or pulsed airjet (using, for example, the techniques disclosed in U.S. Pat. Application Publication US 2010/0015892 A1, published Jan. 21, 2010 and entitled “Method And Apparatus For Prepping Surfaces With A High-Frequency Forced Pulsed Waterjet”). Therefore, the coating particle is used as the blasting particle for prepping the surface prior to coating.
This innovative method thus preps a surface using an abrasive-entrained waterjet or airjet wherein the same or similar particle that is to be used for subsequently coating the surface is also used as a blasting particle for first prepping the surface. In other words, the coating particle is entrained into the waterjet or airjet (or other fluid stream) for prepping the surface. The waterjet or airjet can be either a continuous stream or a pulsed (modulated) stream. Accordingly, prepping operations can be done with the same coating particle used to coat the surface, i.e. with only one type of coating particle that is used for both prepping and coating, as opposed to using one type of abrasive particle for prepping and then a different type of particle for coating.
In accordance with a main aspect of the present invention, an apparatus for prepping a surface comprises a nozzle for directing a fluid stream at the surface to be prepped and a container for containing a supply of coating particles. The apparatus further includes a particle delivery subsystem connected to the nozzle for delivering the coating particles into the nozzle to thereby entrain the coating particles into the fluid stream. The apparatus also includes a pressure source for pressurizing the fluid stream to generate a pressurized fluid stream that is directed through the nozzle at the surface to be prepped to thereby prep the surface with the coating particles.
In accordance with another main aspect of the present invention, a system for prepping a surface using a coating particle and then coating the surface with the same type of coating particle includes a nozzle for blasting the surface with the coating particle to thereby prep the surface to a desired surface roughness for subsequent coating, wherein the same nozzle is also used for coating the surface with the same type of coating particle used to prep the surface. The system includes a container for containing a supply of the coating particles. The system includes a particle delivery subsystem connected to the nozzle via one or more particle inlets for delivering the coating particles from the container through the one or more particle inlets into the nozzle to thereby entrain the coating particles into the fluid stream. The system includes a pump for pressurizing the fluid stream to generate a pressurized fluid stream that is directed through the nozzle at the surface to be prepped to thereby prep the surface with the coating particles. The system further includes a control system for controlling the apparatus for switching being a first mode of operation in which coating particles are entrained into the pressurized fluid stream to thereby prep the surface and a second mode of operation in which substantially the same coating particles are propelled at the surface to thereby coat the surface.
In accordance with yet another main aspect of the present invention, a prepping and coating system comprises a nozzle for directing a fluid stream carrying coating particles at a surface to be sequentially prepped and then coated using the same type of coating particles, the nozzle comprising particle inlets for injecting the coating particles into the nozzle, the nozzle including a mixing chamber for mixing the coating particles with the fluid stream. The system also includes a container for containing the coating particles and a particle delivery subsystem connecting the container to the nozzle for delivering the coating particles into the nozzle to thereby entrain the coating particles into the fluid stream, the particle delivery subsystem including a metering system for metering the coating particles. The system also includes a pump for pressurizing the fluid stream to generate a pressurized fluid stream that is directed through the nozzle at the surface to be prepped to thereby prep the surface with the coating particles, and a control system for controlling the particle delivery subsystem to control delivery of the coating particles into the nozzle.
Further features and advantages of the present technology will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
In general, the present invention is directed to a novel method and apparatus for prepping a surface of a component using a coating particle as the blasting particle (i.e. as the abrasive particle). In other words, the coating particle itself is used as the blasting particle (abrasive particle) that preps the surface prior to coating the surface with the same type of particle. The coating particle can be carried by a pulsed waterjet, a continuous waterjet, a pulsed airjet, a continuous airjet or any other pulsed or continuous (low-temperature or high-temperature) fluid stream. A pulsed waterjet is believed by Applicant to be the best mode of implementing this technology because of the maximal erosive effects (mass removal rates) associated with pulsed waterjet technology. Because the coating particle is ingeniously used as the blasting particle, the problems associated with grit-blasting or prepping using a different particle than what is used to coat the surface are eliminated. This prepping technique not only saves time and cost as there is no need to clean or rinse the grit-blasted surface, but also reduces waste and cleanup time (because a different abrasive is not used). Furthermore, this novel technique enhances the bonding or adhesion of the coating particle to the prepped surface since no foreign abrasive particles are embedded into the surface to be coated.
In the various embodiments of this invention, which will be described below in greater detail, a pulsed or continuous waterjet or airjet apparatus is used to entrain a coating particle such as, for example, a thermal spray coating particle or other coating particle, that is to be applied to the surface after the surface prepping is complete. By entraining the coating particle into the fluid stream, the coating particle is thus used as an abrasive or blasting particle. In other words, the coating particle and the abrasive particle are the same, or at least highly similar in composition, hardness, granularity, etc. This represents a very substantial innovation over the prior art. Conventionally, a surface is prepped using an abrasive to produce a desired surface finish or surface roughness. This surface finish or surface roughness is typically determined ahead of time by the type of coating particle that is to be applied. Thus, empirically it is known that optimal particle retention (coating-surface adhesion) is achieved by prepping the surface to within a certain range of surface roughness. In the prior art, the surface is then typically prepped to within that desired range of surface roughness using a standard abrasive particle (blasting particle) such as, for example, grit, garnet or Zeolite. The problem identified by Applicant is that remnants of blasting particles (abrasive particles) can remain embedded in the atomic matrix of the surface being prepped. These embedded particles can reduce the adhesion of the subsequent coating and/or create local points of weakness leading to unpredictable failure. Applicant has thus realized that this problem can be obviated by using the coating particle as the blasting particle (abrasive particle). This ensures that no foreign particles remain after the prepping. If coating particles are embedded into the atomic matrix of the surface being prepped, then this has no deleterious effect since this particle would have been applied to the surface eventually in the subsequent coating operation. Particles that do not adhere to the surface can be reused or recycled for the subsequent coating stage.
In one embodiment, a coating particle of a slightly different granularity (mesh size) or slightly different composition can be used to prep the surface prior to application of the coating. For example, the coating particles used for prepping may be larger in mesh size than the coating particles used for coating. Using a larger particle to prep the surface is advantageous as these larger particles more closely resemble the larger grit-blast particles that are traditionally used for surface prepping. Despite their larger mesh size, these larger coating particles tend to become smaller in mesh size as they impinge on the surface and are themselves blasted by subsequently impinging particles. A large proportion of the particles that fail to adhere to the surface tend to be these particles of a reduced size. These reduced-size (non-adhered) particles, however, are ideal for coating operations because coating particles used for actually coating should have a smaller mesh size than those used for blasting. Accordingly, these reduced-size particles can be recycled and reused, with optional filtering, for subsequent coating of the prepped surface.
Main embodiments of the present invention will now be described below, by way of example, with reference to the attached drawings.
Coating-Particle-Entrained Pulsed Waterjet
In one embodiment of this invention, a pulsed waterjet apparatus is used to entrain coating particles into the modulated water stream to prep the surface. Pulsed waterjet technology has been developed by Applicant and has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,594,614 (Vijay et al.) entitled ULTRASONIC WATERJET APPARATUS and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,347 entitled ULTRASONICALLY GENERATED CAVITATING OR INTERRUPTED JET, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Coating-Particle-Entrained Continuous Waterjet
In another embodiment of this invention, the waterjet can be a continuous waterjet instead of a pulsed waterjet. The continuous waterjet can be pressurized to very high pressures to achieve the desired surface preparation effect. The continuous waterjet can be generated using a standard waterjet apparatus having no ultrasonic transducer or by deactivating the ultrasonic transducer in an ultrasonic waterjet apparatus.
Coating-Particle-Entrained Pulsed Airjet
In another embodiment of this invention, a pulsed airjet apparatus can be used to entrain a stream of coating particles as abrasives (blasting particles) into the fluid stream for prepping a surface.
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the compressor 202 and reservoir 203 together constitute an example of a pressure source, as the term is used in the present specification, for pressurizing the fluid stream. As will also be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the coating particle hopper 207, the feed line leading from the hopper 207 to the nozzle 210, and metering valve together constitute an example of a particle delivery subsystem, as the term is used in the present specification, for delivering a supply of coating particles into the nozzle. A computer control system may be provided to control the operation of the airjet apparatus.
As further depicted in
Flow characteristics can be modulated by varying key parameters such as the diameter of the air inlet, diameter of the throat (dN), diameter of the exit orifice (de), and the angles θ1 and θ2. These are all important parameters to generate a highly coherent and high-speed coating-particle-entrained continuous or pulsed airjet. Since the density of air is quite low, the operating pressures will be of the order of 1,000 psi (6.9 MPa).
Coating-Particle-Entrained Continuous Airjet
In another embodiment of this invention, the airjet can be a continuous airjet instead of a pulsed airjet. The continuous airjet can be pressurized to achieve the desired surface preparation effect. The continuous airjet can be generated using a standard airjet apparatus having no ultrasonic transducer or by deactivating the ultrasonic transducer in an ultrasonic airjet apparatus.
To summarize, in each of the four embodiments described above, the same coating particles that are to be subsequently used for coating the surface are also used as the blasting particles (abrasive particles) for first prepping the surface. The coating particles are entrained into the fluid stream, be it water or air, continuous or pulsed. The apparatus is designed so that the coating particles are preferably drawn into the nozzle downstream of the microtip connected to the forward end of the ultrasonic transducer to thereby avoid wearing the microtip.
As depicted in
For example, in the HVOF apparatus illustrated in
The embodiments of the invention described above are intended to be exemplary only. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, to whom this specification is addressed, many obvious variations, modifications, and refinements can be made to the embodiments presented herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The scope of the exclusive right sought by the applicant is therefore intended to be limited solely by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/759,302, filed Apr. 13, 2010, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2949900 | Bodine | Aug 1960 | A |
3398758 | Unfried | Aug 1968 | A |
3729871 | Taylor | May 1973 | A |
4067150 | Merrigan | Jan 1978 | A |
4478368 | Yie | Oct 1984 | A |
4555872 | Yie | Dec 1985 | A |
4569161 | Shipman | Feb 1986 | A |
4666083 | Yie | May 1987 | A |
4681264 | Johnson, Jr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4765540 | Yie | Aug 1988 | A |
5018317 | Kiyoshige et al. | May 1991 | A |
5155946 | Domann | Oct 1992 | A |
5291957 | Curlett | Mar 1994 | A |
5421516 | Saitou et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5538191 | Holl | Jul 1996 | A |
5547376 | Harrel | Aug 1996 | A |
5643058 | Erichsen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5752829 | Goldsmith et al. | May 1998 | A |
5849099 | McGuire | Dec 1998 | A |
5862871 | Curlett | Jan 1999 | A |
5927306 | Izumi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6000308 | LaFountain et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026584 | Wegman | Feb 2000 | A |
6036584 | Swinkels et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6189547 | Miyamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6223996 | Yamamoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6244927 | Zeng | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6305261 | Romanini | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6444259 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464567 | Hashish et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6695686 | Frohlich et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6797342 | Sanchez et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6935860 | Rasmussen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7108585 | Dorfman et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7549429 | Nunomura et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7594614 | Vijay et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7762869 | Yoon | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020066770 | James et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020098776 | Dopper | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040097171 | Liwszyc et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20060113400 | Dodson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070063066 | Vijay et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070098912 | Raybould et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080160332 | Dighe et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201973 | Chabot et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090200390 | Babaev | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090224066 | Riemer | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100015892 | Vijay et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100124872 | Hashish et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110011952 | Brusa | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110250361 | Vijay | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10158622 | Jun 2003 | DE |
102005061401 | Jun 2007 | DE |
0647505 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1016735 | Jul 2000 | EP |
0703040 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1160339 | Dec 2001 | EP |
2145689 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2335202 | Jan 2003 | GB |
58052467 | Mar 1983 | JP |
59070757 | Apr 1984 | JP |
61037955 | Feb 1986 | JP |
9213679 | Aug 1992 | WO |
9814638 | Apr 1998 | WO |
2005042177 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Examination Report from corresponding EP Application No. 10197292.5, Mar. 4, 2012. |
Vijay, Mohan V., “Design and development of a prototype pulsed waterjet machine for the removal of hard coatings”, BHR Group Conference Series—14th International Conference on Jetting Technology, 21-23, pp. 39-57, Sep. 1998. |
European Search Report from European Patent Application No. EP10197292, Apr. 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110247554 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12759302 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13111412 | US |