Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
In the remote sensing/aerial imaging industry, imagery is used to capture views of a geographic area and be able to measure objects and structures within the images as well as to be able to determine geographic locations of points within the image. These are generally referred to as “geo-referenced images” and come in two basic categories:
1. Captured Imagery—these images have the appearance as they were captured by the camera or sensor employed.
2. Projected Imagery—these images have been processed and converted such that they confirm to a mathematical projection.
All imagery starts as captured imagery, but as most software cannot geo-reference captured imagery, that imagery is then reprocessed to create the projected imagery. The most common form of projected imagery is the ortho-rectified image. This process aligns the image to an orthogonal or rectilinear grid (composed of rectangles). The input image used to create an ortho-rectified image is a nadir image—that is, an image captured with the camera pointing straight down.
In addition to capturing an image with the camera pointing straight down, it is possible to capture an image with the camera pointing at an oblique angle. The resulting imagery is generally referred to as an “oblique image” or as an “oblique aerial image.” The capture of oblique aerial images presents additional challenges compared to the capture of nadir images, generally due to the introduction of the oblique angle.
An example of a system that captures both nadir and oblique images is shown in
The oblique images present a more natural appearance than a nadir image because they show not just the roofs, as is the case of a nadir image, but also the sides of objects and structures. This is what we are most accustomed to seeing. In order to preserve this natural perspective, oblique images are generally presented without being ortho-rectified and instead left in the natural appearance that the camera captures. This practice makes it very easy for people to look at something in an oblique image and realize what that object is.
However, the sun/sky orientation when an oblique image is taken has a major impact on the color balance of the resulting photograph due to the reflections of light from the sun 16. There are two major types of reflection: diffuse and specular. Flat wall paint is a highly diffuse reflector—that is, light bounces nearly equally in all directions. A mirror is a highly specular reflector—that is, light bounces almost entirely in one direction off the mirror. There is nothing in nature that is a perfect specular or a perfect diffuse reflector—everything is some combination of the two. It is the specular nature of objects that presents a problem for color balancing oblique images.
Color balancing nadir aerial images is known in the art. However, color balancing oblique aerial images presents unique challenges. When collecting nadir images (images captured with camera 14b pointing straight down), every image has a consistent orientation with respect to the sun 16. However, when collecting oblique images (images captured with the cameras 14a and 14c pointing at an oblique angle relative to the horizon) different images have different orientations with respect to the sun 16. For instance, in the northern hemisphere, a camera aimed to the north (camera 14c) points away from the sun 16, while a camera aimed to the south (camera 14a) points toward the sun 16.
Specular reflections bounce off a surface and leave the surface at roughly the same angle with which they hit the surface—like a ball bouncing off a flat surface. When the camera 14a is pointing towards the sun 16, the camera 14a picks up specular reflections from the sun 16 and therefore any images captured with that camera pick up a strong yellow/red tint to the captured scene. The camera 14c, on the other hand, is pointing away from the sun 16 and picks up specular reflections from the sky and therefore any images captured with that camera pick up a strong blue tint to the scene. When these two images are viewed side by side, the difference can be very noticeable and distracting to the overall image appearance. It is desirable to color balance the oblique images such that they have a substantially consistent color tone.
Shown in
Referring to
But with oblique images, because of the nature of trigonometry, when the field of view angle is added to the oblique camera axis angle, the path lengths P1 and P2 are very different. To illustrate an extreme, if the top of the camera is pointed above the horizon then the path length P1 is infinite—clearly much longer than the path length P2 at the front of the image. In a typical camera/lens configuration and at a typical oblique angle, the difference between the shortest path length (to the middle front of the image) and the longest path length (to the far back corner of the image) is about 87%—nearly twice as long.
The challenge this difference in path length presents is that the light from the scene captured by the top of the camera travels through a lot more atmosphere than the light from the scene captured by the bottom of the camera. This results in more tinting or scattering, an increased introduction of blue sky light, an increase in blurriness, and a decrease in clarity due to smog or haze. Thus, if the image is color balanced based upon the tinting in the top of the image then the color balancing of the bottom of the image will be incorrect. Likewise, if the image is color-balanced based upon the tinting in the bottom of the image then the color-balancing of the top of the image will be incorrect. One could color-balance based upon the tinting in the middle of the image, but then the color-balancing of the top and bottom of the image would be incorrect.
In light of the foregoing, there is a need for a system and process for color-balancing oblique images that overcomes the challenges discussed above. It is to such a system and process that the present invention is directed.
This patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
So that the above recited features and advantages of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction, experiments, exemplary data, and/or the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
The processes described in this patent provide a means for color balancing oblique images so that they take on a consistent color tone. The principal behind these processes is to select a set of color-balanced images to use as reference images to create color-balance transformations for a series of oblique images so that the resulting color-balanced oblique images will have a color tone similar to the reference images. Because they typically have a consistent sun/sky orientation, nadir images are often the best choice for the reference images; however, this is not required. It is recommended that the reference images be from a consistent sun/sky orientation, so, for instance, instead of the nadir images, the north-looking oblique images could be used as the reference images and the remaining oblique images transformed to match their color tone.
The consistent color tone for the reference images can be achieved in a variety of manners, such as by having images that are naturally balanced, i.e., captured under similar conditions and/or orientations and therefore already have a consistent color tone, or by color-balancing the images to each other after they are captured so that they have a consistent color tone. Or nadir images captured under different conditions can first be color-balanced to each other to produce a consistent color tone. There are numerous methods for color-balancing nadir images described in remote sensing textbooks—basically any method that produces a consistent color tone for a set of similar images will work. As these methods for nadir images are known in the art, they are not discussed here.
Once the reference images have been selected, the oblique images can be color balanced to match. This is accomplished by finding one or more portion(s) of reference image(s) that correspond to the same area of the scene contained within the oblique image—in other words, finding their areas of overlap.
In a preferred embodiment, the reference images and the oblique images are geo-referenced so that finding the portions of the references image(s) corresponding to the same area of the scene contained within the oblique images can be accomplished with a computer and thereby automated.
Thus, in the preferred embodiment, the logic of the process described herein is executed by a computer to provide an automated process for color-balancing a series of oblique images.
Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to
In general, the computer 22 receives a series of reference images, and a series of oblique images from the camera system 24. The reference images and the oblique images can be received by the computer system 22 either directly or indirectly from the camera system 24, and can be passed from the camera system 24 either in batches, in real-time with the capturing of the reference images and/or the oblique images, or at a period of time substantially after the capturing of the reference images and the oblique images. For example, the reference images and/or the oblique images can be transmitted or transferred from the camera system 24 to the computer system 22 days and/or weeks and/or years after the capturing of the reference images and the oblique images from the camera system 24.
The computer 22 preferably runs image processing software (or firmware) adapted to perform the functions described herein, and the resulting images and data are stored on one or more computer readable mediums. Examples of a computer readable medium include an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, an electronic storage device or the like. The term “Computer” as used herein means a system or systems that are able to embody and/or execute the logic of the processes described herein. The logic embodied in the form of software instructions or firmware may be executed on any appropriate hardware which may be a dedicated system or systems, or a general purpose computer system, a personal computer system or distributed processing computer system, all of which are well understood in the art, and a detailed description of how to make or use such computer systems is not deemed necessary herein. When the computer 22 is used to execute the logic of the processes described herein, such computer(s) and/or execution can be conducted at a same geographic location or multiple different geographic locations. Furthermore, the execution of the logic can be conducted continuously or at multiple discrete times. Further, such logic can be performed about simultaneously with the capture of the images, or thereafter or combinations thereof.
The image capture system 24 is typically used for capturing aerial images as shown in
In certain embodiments, the image capture devices of the image capture system 24 can be mounted to a moving platform such as a manned airplane, an unmanned airplane, a train, an automobile such as a van, a boat, a four wheeler, a motor cycle, a tractor, a robotic device or the like.
As discussed above, the computer 22 executes instructions to effect the color-balancing of the series of oblique images captured from one or more positions and from one or more orientations. On an oblique image by oblique image basis, the computer 22 is programmed with instructions to locate one or more portions of one or more reference images that overlap the oblique image, and then create a color balancing transformation that approximately matches the color distribution of the oblique image to the color distribution of the overlapping portions of the reference images. Then, the computer 22 transforms pixels in the oblique image according to the color balancing transformation created for that oblique image, and then preferably stores the transform pixel values in the oblique image or a copy of the oblique image. The oblique images having the transformed pixel values are referred to herein after as “color-balanced oblique images”.
In a preferred embodiment, the reference images are geo-referenced to aid in the location of the overlapping portion(s), and also color-balanced. The reference images can be color-balanced either naturally because they are captured from a consistent orientation, or they can be color-balanced using well-known practices. In a preferred embodiment, the reference images are nadir images.
In a preferred embodiment, the overlapping portions of the reference images and the oblique images have a similar scene because it is expected that the scenes will be somewhat different. For example, assuming that the scene includes a building, the oblique images will show the sides of the building while the nadir images will not. Typically, the closer the scene contents in the overlapping portion(s) match (Leaf-on, leaf off, flooding, snow, or the like) the better the results. Ideally, the reference images and the oblique images will be taken during the same photo shoot to enhance the similarity of the lighting and scene content.
Preferably, one or more color balancing transformation is created for each of the oblique images in the series of oblique images. However, it should be understood that the one or more color balancing transformations do not have to be made for each of the oblique images in the series. In other words, not all of the oblique images in the series of oblique images must be color-balanced in accordance with the present invention. In addition, while all of the pixels in the oblique image are preferably transformed according to the one or more color balancing transformation created for that particular oblique image, it should be understood that less than all of the pixels can be transformed. For example, the pixels in the oblique image can be organized into groups, and then a certain percentage of such pixels (such as 60-90%) can be transformed.
In general, the automated process preferably (1) divides each oblique image in the series into a plurality of sections, (2) identifies a portion of a reference image overlapping the section, and then (3) creates a color-balancing transformation. Preferably a color-balancing transformation for each color band in the color space is created and for each section in the oblique image approximating the color distribution of the overlapping section in the one or more reference images. For example, assuming an RGB color space, a histogram of the color distribution for each color band, i.e., red, green and blue in each section of the oblique image and the overlapping portion of the same scene in the nadir image (develop two histograms for each section) is created. Exemplary histograms for the red and blue color bands are shown in
The color distribution histogram of an image shows the number of pixels for each pixel value within the range of the image. If the minimum value of the image is 0 and the maximum value of the image is 255, the histogram of the image shows the number of pixels for each value ranging between and including 0 and 255. Peaks in the histogram represent more common values within the image that usually consist of nearly uniform regions. Valleys in the histogram represent less common values. Empty regions within the histogram indicate that no pixels within the image contain those values. The solid lines shown in the histograms in
The solid line in the histogram of
To color-balance the series of oblique images, each of the oblique images are preferably divided into a plurality of sections. For example, an oblique image 30 shown in
Once the oblique image has been divided into sections, then, on a section by section basis one or more portions of a reference image is located that overlaps the oblique image section. Then, a color-balancing transformation is created that approximately matches the color distribution of the oblique image section to the color distribution of the overlapping reference portion(s). This can be accomplished using any suitable algorithm or technique, such as histogram equalization. Histogram equalization is a well known algorithm, so no further comments are deemed necessary to teach one skilled in the art how to make and use histogram equalization. For the oblique image 30 that has been divided into nine oblique image sections 32a-i, this process occurs nine times.
For each section, at least three histograms (color distribution for the overlapping reference portion, color distribution for the oblique image section, and color balancing transformation for the oblique image section) are created for each color band in the color space.
Then, pixel values for each color band in each of the oblique images are color-balanced and blended to provide a substantially consistent color tone. This can be accomplished by using a combination of the color-balancing transformations (e.g., histograms) for the oblique image. The blending may be accomplished through bi-linear interpolation, linear interpolation, cubics, splines and/or the like. Alternatively, one transform may be used for the entire image.
In a preferred embodiment, the color-balancing and blending is accomplished as follows. First, on a pixel by pixel basis, for the oblique image to be color-balanced, one or more oblique image sections are selected which apply to the particular pixel. Then, for each color band, the pixel value is calculated independently (or transformed) using the color balancing transformation for each selected oblique image section yielding a transformed pixel value for each selected oblique image section. Then, the transformed pixel values are blended into a single resulting pixel value using any suitable algorithm, such as bi-linear interpolation, linear interpolation, cubics, splines or the like. Then, the resulting pixel value is stored in the oblique image or a copy (such as a memory copy) of the oblique image. This process is preferably repeated for every pixel in the oblique image. However, it should be understood that this process could only be repeated for a subset of the pixels.
In general, the process described above may be performed on a continuous or intermittent basis. For example, once the section color balancing transformations are created, such section color balancing transformations can be stored, and then applied on a pixel by pixel basis at a later time to color-balance the oblique image. For example, the color-balancing transformations can be stored with the oblique image and then utilized to color-balance the oblique image when it is retrieved or displayed.
Set forth hereinafter is pseudo-code for one embodiment of the present invention:
For RGB color images, the above process is repeated three times, once for each color pixel component, i.e. the red pixels, the green pixels, and the blue pixels, each with its own color-balancing transformation.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that certain changes and modifications may be practiced without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, as described in this specification and as defined in the appended claims below. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. “A,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 16/191,232, filed Nov. 14, 2018; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 15/357,490, filed Nov. 21, 2016, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/632,732, filed Feb. 26, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,503,615; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/153,772, filed Jan. 13, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,971,624; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 13/181,259, filed Jul. 12, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,649,596 issued Feb. 11, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/871,740, filed on Oct. 12, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,991,226 issued Aug. 2, 2011; the entire contents of all of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2273876 | Lutz et al. | Feb 1942 | A |
3153784 | Petrides et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3594556 | Edwards | Jul 1971 | A |
3614410 | Bailey | Oct 1971 | A |
3621326 | Hobrough | Nov 1971 | A |
3661061 | Tokarz | May 1972 | A |
3716669 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3725563 | Woycechowsky | Apr 1973 | A |
3864513 | Halajian et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3866602 | Furihata | Feb 1975 | A |
3877799 | O'Donnell | Apr 1975 | A |
4015080 | Moore-Searson | Mar 1977 | A |
4044879 | Stahl | Aug 1977 | A |
4184711 | Wakimoto | Jan 1980 | A |
4240108 | Levy | Dec 1980 | A |
4281354 | Conte | Jul 1981 | A |
4344683 | Stemme | Aug 1982 | A |
4360876 | Girault et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4382678 | Thompson et al. | May 1983 | A |
4387056 | Stowe | Jun 1983 | A |
4396942 | Gates | Aug 1983 | A |
4463380 | Hooks | Jul 1984 | A |
4489322 | Zulch et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4490742 | Wurtzinger | Dec 1984 | A |
4491399 | Bell | Jan 1985 | A |
4495500 | Vickers | Jan 1985 | A |
4527055 | Harkless et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4543603 | Laures | Sep 1985 | A |
4586138 | Mullenhoff et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4635136 | Ciampa et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4653136 | Denison | Mar 1987 | A |
4653316 | Fukuhara | Mar 1987 | A |
4673988 | Jansson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686474 | Olsen et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4688092 | Kamel et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689748 | Hofmann | Aug 1987 | A |
4707698 | Constant et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4758850 | Archdale et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4805033 | Nishikawa | Feb 1989 | A |
4807024 | Mclaurin et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4814711 | Olsen et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4814896 | Heitzman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4843463 | Michetti | Jun 1989 | A |
4899296 | Khattak | Feb 1990 | A |
4906198 | Cosimano et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4953227 | Katsuma et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4956872 | Kimura | Sep 1990 | A |
5034812 | Rawlings | Jul 1991 | A |
5086314 | Aoki et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5121222 | Endoh et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5138444 | Hiramatsu | Aug 1992 | A |
5155597 | Lareau et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5164825 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166789 | Myrick | Nov 1992 | A |
5191174 | Chang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200793 | Ulich et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210586 | Grage et al. | May 1993 | A |
5231435 | Blakely | Jul 1993 | A |
5247356 | Ciampa | Sep 1993 | A |
5251037 | Busenberg | Oct 1993 | A |
5265173 | Griffin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267042 | Tsuchiya et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270756 | Busenberg | Dec 1993 | A |
5296884 | Honda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5335072 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337093 | Kaneko et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342999 | Frei et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345086 | Bertram | Sep 1994 | A |
5353055 | Hiramatsu | Oct 1994 | A |
5363318 | McCauley | Nov 1994 | A |
5369443 | Woodham | Nov 1994 | A |
5402170 | Parulski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414462 | Veatch | May 1995 | A |
5467271 | Abel et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481479 | Wight et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486948 | Imai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506644 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5508736 | Cooper | Apr 1996 | A |
5555018 | von Braun | Sep 1996 | A |
5563654 | Song | Oct 1996 | A |
5604534 | Hedges et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617224 | Ichikawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633946 | Lachinski et al. | May 1997 | A |
5668593 | Lareau et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677515 | Selk et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5798786 | Lareau et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835133 | Moreton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841574 | Willey | Nov 1998 | A |
5844602 | Lareau et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852753 | Lo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5894323 | Kain et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899945 | Baylocq et al. | May 1999 | A |
5963664 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6037945 | Loveland | Mar 2000 | A |
6088055 | Lareau et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094215 | Sundahl et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097854 | Szeliski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108032 | Hoagland | Aug 2000 | A |
6130705 | Lareau et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157747 | Szeliski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167300 | Cherepenin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6222583 | Matsumura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236382 | Kawakami et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236886 | Cherepenin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249315 | Holm | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256004 | Izumi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256057 | Mathews et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6373522 | Mathews et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6421610 | Carroll et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434280 | Peleg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6594388 | Gindele | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597818 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6639596 | Shum et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650771 | Walker | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664973 | Iwamoto | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6711475 | Murphy | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714243 | Mathur | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731329 | Feist et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6747686 | Bennett | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754279 | Zhou | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791711 | Uekusa | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810383 | Loveland | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816819 | Loveland | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826539 | Loveland | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829584 | Loveland | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6834128 | Altunbasak et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6876763 | Sorek et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7009638 | Gruber et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018050 | Ulichney et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046401 | Dufaux et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061650 | Walmsley et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065260 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7123382 | Walmsley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127348 | Smitherman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133551 | Chen | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142984 | Rahmes et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7184072 | Loewen et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7233691 | Setterholm | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7262790 | Bakewell | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7348895 | Lagassey | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7397972 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7457458 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7509241 | Guo | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7728833 | Verma | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832267 | Woro | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844499 | Yahiro | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7991226 | Schultz | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8078396 | Meadow | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8649596 | Schultz | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8705843 | Lieckfeldt | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8971624 | Schultz | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9503615 | Schultz | Nov 2016 | B2 |
10580169 | Schultz | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20020041328 | LeCompte et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020041717 | Murata et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020114536 | Xiong et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030014224 | Guo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043824 | Remboski et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088362 | Melero et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030164962 | Nims et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030214585 | Bakewell | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040057633 | Mai et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040105090 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040167709 | Smitherman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050073241 | Yamauchi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088251 | Matsumoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050169521 | Hel-Or | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060028550 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060080037 | Borg et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092043 | Lagassey | May 2006 | A1 |
20060195858 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060238383 | Kimchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250515 | Koseki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070024612 | Balfour | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046448 | Smitherman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050340 | Von Kaenel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070237420 | Steedly et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080120031 | Rosenfeld et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123994 | Schultz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136752 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158256 | Russell et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080273090 | Niimura | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090174836 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177458 | Hochart et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090208095 | Zebedin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090304227 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100296693 | Thornberry et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110033110 | Shimamura et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130246204 | Thornberry et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20160209716 | Kim | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
331204 | Jul 2006 | AT |
0316110 | Sep 2005 | BR |
2402234 | Sep 2000 | CA |
2505566 | May 2004 | CA |
1735897 | Feb 2006 | CN |
60017384 | Mar 2006 | DE |
60306301 | Nov 2006 | DE |
1418402 | Oct 2006 | DK |
1010966 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1180967 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1418402 | May 2004 | EP |
1696204 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2266704 | Mar 2007 | ES |
2003317089 | Nov 2003 | JP |
PA05004987 | Feb 2006 | MX |
WO9918732 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO2000053090 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO2004044692 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2005088251 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2008028040 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ackermann, Prospects of Kinematic GPS Aerial Triangulation, ITC Journal, 1992. |
Ciampa, John A., “Pictometry Digital Video Mapping”, SPIE, vol. 2598, pp. 140-148, 1995. |
Ciampa, J. A., Oversee, Presented at Reconstruction After Urban earthquakes, Buffalo, NY, 1989. |
Dunford et al., Remote Sensing for Rural Development Planning in Africa, The Journal for the International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences, 2:99-108, 1983. |
Gagnon, P.A., Agnard, J. P., Nolette, C., & Boulianne, M., “A Micro-Computer based General Photogrammetric System”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, No. 5., pp. 623-625, 1990. |
Konecny, G., “Issues of Digital Mapping”, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, GIS Ostrava 2008, Ostrava 27.-30.1.2008, pp. 1-8. |
Konecny, G., “Analytical Aerial Triangulation with Convergent Photography”, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, pp. 37-57, 1966. |
Konecny, G., “Interior Orientation and Convergent Photography”, Photogrammetric Engineering, pp. 625-634, 1965. |
Graham, Lee A., “Airborne Video for Near-Real-Time Vegetation Mapping”, Journal of Forestry, 8:28-32, 1993. |
Graham, Horita TRG-50 SMPTE Time-Code Reader, Generator, Window Inserter, 1990. |
Hess, L.L, et al., “Geocoded Digital Videography for Validation of Land Cover Mapping in the Amazon Basin”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 1527-1555, 2002. |
Hinthorne, J., et al., “Image Processing in the Grass GIS”, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4:2227-2229, 1991. |
Imhof, Ralph K., “Mapping from Oblique Photographs”, Manual of Photogrammetry, Chapter 18, 1966. |
Jensen, John R., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice-Hall, 1986; 399 pages. |
Lapine, Lewis A., “Practical Photogrammetric Control by Kinematic GPS”, GPS World, 1(3):44-49, 1990. |
Lapine, Lewis A., Airborne Kinematic GPS Positioning for Photogrammetry—The Determination of the Camera Exposure Station, Silver Spring, MD, 11 pages, at least as early as 2000. |
Linden et al., Airborne Video Automated Processing, US Forest Service Internal report, Fort Collins, CO, 1993. |
Myhre, Dick, “Airborne Video System Users Guide”, USDA Forest Service, Forest Pest Management Applications Group, published by Management Assistance Corporation of America, 6 pages, 1992. |
Myhre et al., “An Airborne Video System Developed Within Forest Pest Management—Status and Activities”, 10 pages, 1992. |
Myhre et al., “Airborne Videography—A Potential Tool for Resource Managers”—Proceedings: Resource Technology 90, 2nd International Symposium on Advanced Technology in Natural Resource Management, 5 pages, 1990. |
Myhre et al., Aerial Photography for Forest Pest Management, Proceedings of Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, Slidell, Louisiana, 153-162, 1988. |
Myhre et al., “Airborne Video Technology”, Forest Pest Management/Methods Application Group, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 1-6, at least as early as Jul. 30, 2006. |
Norton-Griffiths et al., 1982. “Sample surveys from light aircraft combining visual observations and very large scale color photography”. University of Arizona Remote Sensing Newsletter 82-2:1-4. |
Norton-Griffiths et al., “Aerial Point Sampling for Land Use Surveys”, Journal of Biogeography, 15:149-156, 1988. |
Novak, Rectification of Digital Imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 339-344, 1992. |
Slaymaker, Dana M., “Point Sampling Surveys with GPS-logged Aerial Videography”, Gap Bulletin No. 5, University of Idaho, http://www.agp.uidaho.edu/Bulletins/5/PSSwGPS.html, 1996. |
Slaymaker, et al., “Madagascar Protected Areas Mapped with GPS-logged Aerial Video and 35mm Air Photos”, Earth Observation magazine, vol. 9, No. 1, http://www.eomonline.com/Common/Archives/2000jan/00jan_tableofcontents.html, pp. 1-4, 2000. |
Slaymaker, et al., “Cost-effective Determination of Biomass from Aerial Images”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1737:67-76, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=648004.743267&coll=GUIDE&dl=,1999. |
Slaymaker, et al., “A System for Real-time Generation of Geo-referenced Terrain Models”, 4232A-08, SPIE Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement Boston, MA, ftp://vis-ftp.cs.umass.edu/Papers/schultz/spie2000.pdf, 2000. |
Slaymaker, et al., “Integrating Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography, and a Laser Profiler for Environmental Monitoring”, In ISPRS WG III/1 Workshop on Integrated Sensor Calibration and Orientation, Portland, Maine, 1999. |
Slaymaker, et al., “Calculating Forest Biomass With Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography and a Profiling Laser”, In Proceedings of the 17th Biennial Workshop on Color Photography and Videography in Resource Assessment, Reno, NV, 1999. |
Slaymaker et al., Mapping Deciduous Forests in Southern New England using Aerial Videography and Hyperclustered Multi-Temporal Landsat TM Imagery, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts, 1996. |
Star et al., “Geographic Information Systems an Introduction”, Prentice-Hall, 1990. |
Tomasi et al., “Shape and Motion from Image Streams: a Factorization Method”—Full Report on the Orthographic Case, pp. 9795-9802, 1992. |
Warren, Fire Mapping with the Fire Mousetrap, Aviation and Fire Management, Advanced Electronics System Development Group, USDA Forest Service, 1986. |
Welch, R., “Desktop Mapping with Personal Computers”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1651-1662, 1989. |
Westervelt, James, “Introduction to GRASS 4”, pp. 1-25, 1991. |
“RGB Spectrum Videographics Report, vol. 4, No. 1, McDonnell Douglas Integrates RGB Spectrum Systems in Helicopter Simulators”, pp. 1-6, 1995. |
RGB “Computer Wall”, RGB Spectrum, 4 pages, 1995. |
“The First Scan Converter with Digital Video Output”, Introducing . . . The RGB/Videolink 1700D-1, RGB Spectrum, 2 pages, 1995. |
ERDAS Field Guide, Version 7.4, A Manual for a commercial image processing system, 1990. |
“Image Measurement and Aerial Photography”, Magazine for all branches of Photogrammetry and its fringe areas, Organ of the German Photogrammetry Association, Berlin-Wilmersdorf, No. 1, 1958. |
“Airvideo Analysis”, MicroImages, Inc., Lincoln, NE, 1 page, Dec. 1992. |
Zhu, Zhigang, Hanson, Allen R., “Mosaic-Based 3D Scene Representation and Rendering”, Image Processing, 2005, ICIP 2005, IEEE International Conference on 1(2005). |
Mostafa, et al., “Direct Positioning and Orientation Systems How do they Work? What is the Attainable Accuracy?”, Proceeding, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO, Apr. 24-27, 2001. |
“POS AV” georeferenced by APPLANIX aided inertial technology, http://www.applanix.com/products/posav_index.php. |
Mostafa, et al., “Ground Accuracy from Directly Georeferenced Imagery”, Published in GIM International vol. 14 N. Dec. 12, 2000. |
Mostafa, et al., “Airborne Direct Georeferencing of Frame Imagery: An Error Budget”, The 3rd International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology, Cairo, Egypt, Jan. 3-5, 2001. |
Mostafa, M.R. and Hutton, J., “Airborne Kinematic Positioning and Attitude Determination Without Base Stations”, Proceedings, International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics, and Navigation (KIS 2001) Banff, Alberta, Canada, Jun. 4-8, 2001. |
Mostafa, et al., “Airborne DGPS Without Dedicated Base Stations for Mapping Applications”, Proceedings of ION-GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Sep. 11-14. |
Mostafa, “ISAT Direct Exterior Orientation QA/QC Strategy Using POS Data”, Proceedings of OEEPE Workshop: Integrated Sensor Orientation, Hanover, Germany, Sep. 17-18, 2001. |
Mostafa, “Camera/IMU Boresight Calibration: New Advances and Performance Analysis”, Proceedings of the ASPRS Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Apr. 21-26, 2002. |
Hiatt, “Sensor Integration Aids Mapping at Ground Zero”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Sep. 2002, p. 877-878. |
Mostafa, “Precision Aircraft GPS Positioning Using CORS”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Nov. 2002, p. 1125-1126. |
Mostafa, et al., System Performance Analysis of INS/DGPS Integrated System for Mobile Mapping System (MMS), Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Commission VI, WG VI/4, Mar. 2004. |
Artes F., & Hutton, J., “GPS and Inertial Navigation Delivering”, Sep. 2005, GEOconnexion International Magazine, p. 52-53, Sep. 2005. |
“POS AV” APPLANIX, Product Outline, airborne@applanix.com, 3 pages, Mar. 28, 2007. |
POSTrack, “Factsheet”, APPLANIX, Ontario, Canada, www.applanix.com, Mar. 2007. |
POS AV “Digital Frame Camera Applications”, 3001 Inc., Brochure, 2007. |
POS AV “Digital Scanner Applications”, Earthdata Brochure, Mar. 2007. |
POS AV “Film Camera Applications” AeroMap Brochure, Mar. 2007. |
POS AV “LIDAR Applications” MD Atlantic Brochure, Mar. 2007. |
POS AV “OEM System Specifications”, 2005. |
POS AV “Synthetic Aperture Radar Applications”, Overview, Orbisat Brochure, Mar. 2007. |
“POSTrack V5 Specifications” 2005. |
“Remote Sensing for Resource Inventory Planning and Monitoring”, Proceeding of the Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Slidell, Louisiana and NSTL, Mississippi, Apr. 11-15, 1988. |
“Protecting Natural Resources with Remote Sensing”, Proceeding of the Third Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Apr. 9-13, 1990. |
Heipke, et al, “Test Goals and Test Set Up for the OEEPE Test—Integrated Sensor Orientation”, 1999. |
Kumar, et al., “Registration of Video to Georeferenced Imagery”, Sarnoff Corporation, CN5300, Princeton, NJ, 1998. |
McConnel, Proceedings Aerial Pest Detection and Monitoring Workshop—1994.pdf, USDA Forest Service Forest Pest Management, Northern Region, Intermountain region, Forest Insects and Diseases, Pacific Northwest Region. |
“Standards for Digital Orthophotos”, National Mapping Program Technical Instructions, US Department of the Interior, Dec. 1996. |
Tao, “Mobile Mapping Technology for Road Network Data Acquisition”, Journal of Geospatial Engineering, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-13, 2000. |
“Mobile Mapping Systems Lesson 4”, Lesson 4 SURE 382 Geographic Information Systems II, pp. 1-29, Jul. 2, 2006. |
Konecny, G., “Mechanische Radialtriangulation mit Konvergentaufnahmen”, Bildmessung und Luftbildwesen, 1958, Nr. 1. |
Myhre, “ASPRS/ACSM/RT 92” Technical papers, Washington, D.C., vol. 5 Resource Technology 92, Aug. 3-8, 1992. |
Rattigan, “Towns get new view from above,” The Boston Globe, Sep. 5, 2002. |
Mostafa, et al., “Digital image georeferencing from a multiple camera system by GPS/INS,” ISP RS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 56(I): I-12, Jun. 2001. |
Dillow, “Grin, or bare it, for aerial shot,” Orange County Register (California), Feb. 25, 200I. |
Anonymous, “Live automatic coordinates for aerial images,” Advanced Imaging, 12(6):51, Jun. 1997. |
Anonymous, “Pictometry and US Geological Survey announce—Cooperative Research and Development Agreement,” Press Release published Oct. 20, 1999. |
Miller, “Digital software gives small Arlington the Big Picture,” Government Computer NewsState & Local, 7(12), Dec. 2001. |
Garrett, “Pictometry: Aerial photography on steroids,” Law Enforcement Technology 29(7):114-116, Jul. 2002. |
Weaver, “County gets an eyeful,” The Post-Standard (Syracuse, NY), May 18, 2002. |
Reed, “Firm gets latitude to map O.C. in 3D,” Orange County Register (California), Sep. 27, 2000. |
Reyes, “Orange County freezes ambitious aerial photography project,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 16, 2000. |
Aerowest Pricelist of Geodata as of Oct. 21, 2005 and translations to English 3 pages. |
www.archive.org Web site showing archive of German AeroDach Web Site http://www.aerodach.de from Jun. 13, 2004 (retrieved Sep. 20, 2012) and translations to English 4 pages. |
AeroDach® Online Roof Evaluation Standard Delivery Format and 3D Data File: Document Version 01.00.2002 with publication in 2002, 13 pages. |
Noronha et al., “Detection and Modeling of Building from Multiple Aerial Images,” Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, University of Southern California, Nov. 27, 2001, 32 pages. |
Applicad Reports dated Nov. 25, 1999-Mar. 9, 2005, 50 pages. |
Applicad Online Product Bulletin archive from Jan. 7, 2003, 4 pages. |
Applicad Sorcerer Guide, Version 3, Sep. 8, 1999, 142 pages. |
Xactimate Claims Estimating Software archive from Feb. 12, 2010, 8 pages. |
Bignone et al, Automatic Extraction of Generic House Roofs from High Resolution Aerial Imagery, Communication Technology Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland, 12 pages, 1996. |
Geospan 2007 Job proposal. |
Greening et al., Commercial Applications of GPS-Assisted Photogrammetry, Presented at GIS/LIS Annual Conference and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, Oct. 1994. |
APPLANIX Corp, Robust, Precise Position and Orientation Solutions, POS/AV & POS/DG Installation & Operation Manual, Redefining the way you survey, May 19, 1999, Ontario, Canada. |
APPLANIX Corp, Robust, Precise Position and Orientation Solutions, POS/AV V4 Ethernet & Disk Logging ICD, Redefining the way you survey, Revision 3, Apr. 18, 2001, Ontario, Canada. |
International Search Authority—U.S.; International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/US08/75909; dated Jan. 12, 2009. |
Chandeller, Laure; and Martinoty, Gilles, “A Radiometric Aerial Triangulation for the Equalization of Digital Aerial Images and Orthoimages,” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, vol. 75, No. 2, Feb. 2009, pp. 193-200. |
Canadian Patent Office; Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2013 for application 2,702,258. |
Applicant; Response to Sep. 27, 2013 Canadian Office Action regarding application 2,702,258; dated Mar. 26, 2014. |
Canadian Patent Office; Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2014 for application 2,702,258. |
Applicant; Response to Apr. 23, 2014 Canadian Office Action regarding application 2,702,258; dated Oct. 8, 2014. |
Canadian Patent Office; Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2014 for application 2,702,258. |
Applicant; Response to Nov. 27, 2014 Canadian Office Action regarding application 2,702,258; dated May 27, 2015. |
European Patent Office; Supplementary European search report and European search opinion regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5 PCT/US200807509; dated Aug. 8, 2013. |
Ming-Sui, Lee, et al., “Pixel and Compressed-Domain Color Matching Techniques for Video Mosaic Applications,” Visual Communications and Image Processing, Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, XP030081342, Ch. 2.1. |
Kim, D-H, et al., “An Efficient Method to build panoramic image mosaics,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24, No. 14, pp. 2421-2429, Oct. 1, 2003, XP004437193, Technical Fields, ISSN: 0167-8655. |
Applicant; Response to Aug. 8, 2013 Supplementary European search report and European search opinion regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5; dated Mar. 6, 2014. |
USPTO, Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Dec. 21, 2010. |
Pictometry International Corp., Response to Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Jun. 21, 2011. |
USPTO, Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Sep. 16, 2011. |
Pictometry International Corp., Response to Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Mar. 16, 2012. |
USPTO, Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
Pictometry International Corp., Response to Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Jan. 15, 2013. |
Luong et al., “Fully Parallel Superconducting Analog-to-Digital Converter”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1993, pp. 2633-2636. |
European Patent Office, Examination Report regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Nov. 8, 2016. |
Pictometry International Corp., Response to Examination Report regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Mar. 10, 2017. |
European Patent Office, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Feb. 8, 2018. |
Pictometry International Corp., Written Submission in Response to Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated May 25, 2018. |
European Patent Office, Communication Maintaining Oral Proceedings regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Jun. 12, 2018. |
European Patent Office, Decision to Refuse European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Jul. 12, 2018. |
Pictometry International Corp., Appeal Grounds regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Nov. 12, 2018. |
Rochester Institute of Technology, “Wildfire Airborne Sensor Program (WASP) Project Overview,” Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Industrial Associates Meeting, May 13, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200202583 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16191232 | Nov 2018 | US |
Child | 16806347 | US | |
Parent | 15357490 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 16191232 | US | |
Parent | 14632732 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15357490 | US | |
Parent | 14153772 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 14632732 | US | |
Parent | 13181259 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14153772 | US | |
Parent | 11871740 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13181259 | US |