The present invention relates in general to processing and cryopreservation of semen. In particular, the present invention discloses systems and method featuring high-precision and continuous addition of a fluid with agitation to optimize cryopreservation of sperm cells.
Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa involves the stabilization of sperm cells at cryogenic temperatures. This technology is commonly utilized in artificial insemination procedures or to preserve male fertility. During a cryopreservation procedure, a cryoprotectant is added to a sperm specimen to protect the sperm from freeze damage. A disadvantage of this procedure is that the uptake of the cryoprotectant imparts stress to the sperm cells, resulting in cell die-off. It is believed that a larger cryoprotectant to sperm cell concentration mismatch only increases this imparted stress. Past known solutions involve a drop-wise addition of cryoprotectant media via droplets breaking away from a suspended dispense tube, or step-wise addition comprising multiple discrete additions spaced minutes apart.
In drop-wise addition, a setup akin to a buret based titration is used. The cryo-protectant media (cryo-media) is added by drop over an extended period of time. In step-wise or bulk addition, the cryo-media is suspended in a vessel above the sperm sample. A stopcock attached to the vessel is used to start/stop flow. There is no deliberate control of the flow rate; instead, a mass balance is used to estimate the volume delivered. The addition of cryo-media is completed within minutes to read the desired total volume added. For example, the cryo-media may be added in three discrete bulk additions spaced 15 minutes apart. These procedures can still result in cell die-off; hence, there exists a need to reduce the rate of cell die off during the addition of a cryoprotectant media to sperm cells.
It is an objective of the present invention to provide systems and methods that can mitigate the detrimental effects of cryopreservation on sperm integrity, as specified in the independent claims. Embodiments of the invention are given in the dependent claims. Embodiments of the present invention can be freely combined with each other if they are not mutually exclusive.
In some aspects, the present invention features an integrated cryopreservation system that can improve survivability and process yield of sperm cells. In an exemplary embodiment, the present invention may feature a dispensing system comprising a vessel, a controlled dispenser, and a dispense tube. The controlled dispenser may be configured to dispense the fluid through the dispense tube and into the vessel. A non-limiting example of the controlled dispenser is a syringe pump comprising a syringe for containing a fluid, such as the cryoprotectant, and a pushing mechanism for displacing the syringe plunger. The syringe pump may be configured to dispense the fluid through the dispense tube and into the vessel upon displacement of the syringe by the pushing mechanism. In some embodiments, the dispense tube has a first end fluidly connected to a discharge port of the controlled dispenser and a second end disposed inside the vessel. In one embodiment, the second end may be contacting a material contained within the vessel. The material contained within the vessel may be cells, such as sperm cells, in a sample medium (i.e. a liquid media that contains e.g. salts, sugars, buffers, proteins, antibiotics, lipids, anti-oxidants, etc.). In the case of sperm cells, the sperm cells can be sexed (i.e. post-processing) or unsexed (i.e. “conventional”). The system may also be used for other cell types, e.g. cell cultures, oocytes, and embryos. Alternatively, or in conjunction, the second end may be contacting an internal surface of the vessel.
According to some embodiments, the pushing mechanism may comprise a moveable pusher block, a motor operatively coupled to said pusher block, and a motor controller for controlling the motor. The pusher block and syringe may be arranged on a track and aligned such that the pusher block can press against a plunger of the syringe. The motor is configured to move the pusher block along the track in a direction that pushes the plunger into a barrel of the syringe, thereby displacing the syringe. Displacement of the syringe ejects the fluid contained in the barrel through the discharge port and into the dispense tube. The fluid exits the dispense tube through the second end and into the vessel.
In other aspects, the dispensing system may further comprise a mixer for mixing the contents in the vessel. In further embodiments, the dispensing system may further comprise one or more additional controlled dispensers, and a dispense tube fluidly connecting each controlled dispenser to the vessel. The additional dispensers can dispense the same or different fluids, such as cryoprotectants or gases, through their respective dispense tubes and into the vessel upon displacement by the pushing mechanisms.
In one embodiment, the controlled dispenser can continuously dispense the fluid. In a non-limiting example, the pushing mechanism may displace the syringe plunger such that the fluid is dispensed continuously from the second end of the dispense tube that is submerged in the sperm cells. In another embodiment, the controlled dispenser can continuously dispense the fluid such that droplet formation is prevented and the fluid is dispensed without being dripped into the vessel. In yet other embodiments, the controlled dispenser can dispense the fluid into the vessel at a flow rate that is less than or equal to a maximum flow rate, fmax, determined by the equation: fmax (ml/min)=0.0045*V, where V=volume of material in ml. In alternative embodiments, (for example, embodiments with a shorter dispense time of around 45 minutes) the maximum flow rate, fmax, may be determined by the equation: fmax (ml/min)=0.0056*V, where V=volume of material in ml. The maximum flow rate is dictated by the volume of cryoprotectant (which is in turn dictated by the measured amount of sample), which is added over a set amount of time. Typically, the addition time is about 60 minutes, but in some instances may be about 45 minutes. For larger samples, the volume of cryoprotectant needed will be larger, and thus the maximum flow rate will be larger. Thus, the addition time may be roughly constant, regardless of the sample size and the volume of cryoprotectant added, because the total flow rate may be scaled linearly with the volume.
According to other embodiments, the cryopreservation system of the present invention may be utilized in a method for preparing the biological specimens for cryopreservation. When implementing the syringe pump as the controlled dispenser, the method may comprise adding the cryoprotectant into the syringe, adding the biological specimen into a vessel, connecting the syringe to the vessel via a dispense tube, and displacing the syringe to dispense the cryoprotectant into the vessel at a desired flow rate, thereby adding the cryoprotectant to the biological specimen. In one embodiment, one end of the dispense tube may be contacting the biological specimen or an internal surface of the vessel. In some embodiments, the cryoprotectant is continuously dispensed into the vessel. In a preferred embodiment, the syringe is displaced such that droplet formation is prevented and the cryoprotectant is dispensed without being dripped into the vessel. In other embodiments, the cryoprotectant is dispensed into the vessel at a flow rate that is less than or equal to the maximum flow rate, fmax, determined by the previous equation.
One of the unique and technical features of the present invention is the continuous addition of the cryoprotectant to the specimen as compared to bulk or drop-wise addition. The same volume of cryoprotectant media, such as a glycerol-based cryoprotectant, can be added at a slow and continuous rate over a specified period of time. Another technical feature of the invention is the dispense tube submerged or contacting an internal surface of the vessel to enable low or soft impact addition of the cryoprotectant to the sperm cell solution. This feature can allow for gradual introduction of the cryoprotectant into the sperm cell solution in a manner that reduces cell stress. Yet another technical feature of the invention is the dilute addition of cryoprotectant in which the cryoprotectant enters the sperm cell fluid at a relatively low volume to reduce cytotoxity to local cells at or near the entry point. Without wishing to be limited by a particular theory or mechanism, it is believed that these technical features can reduce process risks and the rate of cell die off, thereby improving survivability and process yield of sperm cells. None of the presently known prior references or work has the unique inventive technical feature of the present invention.
In addition, the inventive technical feature of the present invention contributed to a surprising result. After extensive experimentation, it was unexpectedly found that through the cryopreservation preparation process, the survivability of cells increased by an average of 5% when using the submerged, continuous addition process in comparison to the step-wise addition process of three bulk additions spaced 15 minutes apart). The ratio of specimen volume to dispensed cryoprotectant volume was the same in both procedures. Furthermore, it was surprisingly found that cells prepared using the cryopreservation preparation process of the present invention had an 8% increase in survivability through the freeze/thaw procedure. Thus, the present invention was surprisingly able to increase the process yield of sperm cells, an outcome that one of ordinary skill in the art cannot simply predict or envision.
Any feature or combination of features described herein are included within the scope of the present invention provided that the features included in any such combination are not mutually inconsistent as will be apparent from the context, this specification, and the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art. Additional advantages and aspects of the present invention are apparent in the following detailed description and claims.
The patent application or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee
The features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from a consideration of the following detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Following is a list of elements corresponding to a particular element referred to herein:
As used herein, a “cryoprotectant” refers to a chemical substance that is added to a biological specimen in order to protect said specimen from freeze damage during cryopreservation. The term “cryoprotectant” may be used interchangeably with the terms “cryoprotectant media” or “cryo-media”. Examples of cryoprotectants include, but are not limited to, glycerol, ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), sucrose, trehalose, dextrose, fructose, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS), TRIS B, Tris-Fructose-Egg yolk-Glycerol (TFEG), citric acid, and 1,2-propanediol.
As used herein, the “controlled dispenser” refers to any device capable of delivering a fluid, such as cryoprotectant or gas, at a controlled flow rate. In some preferred embodiments, the dispenser is automated. In other embodiments, the dispenser may be non-automated. Non-limiting examples of controlled dispensers that may be used in accordance with the present invention include a syringe pump, mechanical pump, peristaltic pump, gravity pump, direct lift pump, microfluidic pump, centrifugal pump, compressor, gas regulator, or any positive-displacement pump. In some preferred embodiments, the dispenser may be any flow controller that can deliver fluid with similar accuracy as a syringe pump. In another example, the controlled dispenser may comprise a vessel that has with it a controlled pressure above the fluid and a downstream flow rate measurement. A simple feedback loop controls pressure based on flow rate error to a set point. Alternatively, a throttling valve may be implemented to control flow instead of controlling pressure on the fluid.
As used herein, the term “syringe” refers to a positive-displacement pump comprising a barrel and a moveable, e.g. slidable, plunger that can be inserted into the barrel. The plunger can include a seal that allows for the plunger to create a suction when the plunger is pulled away from the barrel, thereby drawing and trapping fluids in the barrel. Pushing the plunger into the barrel forces, e.g. discharges, the trapped fluids from the barrel. As used herein, the term “displace” and derivatives thereof when used in conjunction with syringe refer to the plunger being pushed into the barrel.
Referring now to
According to some embodiments, the dispensing system (100) of the present invention may be utilized in cryopreservation procedure. For example, in one embodiment, the invention features a cryopreservation system (100) for dispensing a cryoprotectant (102) to a biological specimen (104). In some embodiments, the cryoprotectant (102) may comprise glycerol, ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), 1,2-propanediol, or any other suitable substance that can prevent damage to a biological specimen during freezing.
In one embodiment, the biological specimen (104) may comprise sperm cells. The sperm cells may comprise sex-sorted or gendered-skewed cells in which they predominantly contain an X-chromosome or a Y-chromosome. For example, the sperm cells may be sex-sorted to predominantly contain the X-chromosome so as to increase the likelihood that after insemination, the resulting fetus is a female. In another embodiment, the sperm cells may be unsorted. In other embodiments, the present invention is not limited to just sperm cells. Other types of specimens may be cryopreserved in accordance with the present invention. For example, the biological specimen may comprise tissues, stem cells, bone marrow, embryos, ova, oocytes, egg cells, amniotic fluid and umbilical cord, hepatocytes, blood cells, neuronal cells, organs, teeth, plant seeds, and microorganisms.
In one embodiment, the cryopreservation system (100) may comprise a vessel (110) for containing the biological specimen (104), a syringe pump (115) comprising a syringe (120) for containing the cryoprotectant (102) and a pushing mechanism (130) for displacing said syringe (120), and a dispense tube (140) having a first end (142) fluidly connected to a discharge port (126) of the syringe and a second end (144) disposed inside the vessel (110). The syringe pump (115) can dispense the cryoprotectant (102) through the dispense tube (140) and into the vessel (110) upon displacement of the syringe (120) by the pushing mechanism (130).
In some embodiments, the second end (144) may be in contact with an internal surface (112) of the vessel. For example, the second end (144) may be directly touching or positioned adjacent to the internal surface (112) of the vessel. In other embodiments, the second end (144) may be in contact with the biological specimen (104) when it is contained in the vessel (110). For instance, the second end (144) of the tube may be submerged in the biological specimen (104). In a preferred embodiment, the dispensed cryoprotectant (102) is prevented from being dripped into the vessel (110) by contacting the second end (144) of the tube with the biological specimen (104) or the internal surface (112) of the vessel. As used herein, the term “drip” and derivatives thereof refer to droplets breaking away from a suspended dispense tube.
In one embodiment, the internal surface (112) of the vessel can include an internal side surface or internal bottom surface of the vessel. In some embodiments, the vessel (110) may be a flask, a tube, or any container having sufficient volumetric capacity to hold the cryoprotectant (102) and biological specimen (104). For example, the vessel (110) may have a volumetric capacity ranging from about 20 ml to about 100 ml. In another embodiment, the capacity of the vessel (110) may range about 100 ml to about 250 ml or about 250 ml to about 500 ml. In yet another embodiment, the capacity of the vessel (110) may be greater than 500 ml. In other embodiments, the vessel (110) may be an enclosed or sealed container. As shown in
In one embodiment, if the second end (144) of the dispense tube is in contact with the biological specimen (104), the cryoprotectant (102) is directly added to the biological specimen (104). For instance, the second end (144) is submerged in the biological specimen (104) and cryoprotectant (102) as the cryoprotectant (102) is added into the vessel. In another embodiment, if the second end (144) of the dispense tube is in contact with an internal surface of the vessel but not in contact with the biological specimen (104), e.g. the vessel side wall, the cryoprotectant (102) may be added to the biological specimen (104) indirectly. As shown in
Without wishing to limit the present invention to a particular mechanism, the syringe pump can control the rate of delivery of the cryoprotectant by precise displacement of the syringe plunger. In one embodiment, the addition rate is set programmatically as a function of the volume of cells. Since the batch size of sperm cells can vary greatly based on the number of cells received from an ejaculate, a wide range of addition volumes must be satisfied. In some embodiments, the volume of sperm cell fluid may range from about 1 ml to about 100 mL per semen sample. In preferred embodiments, the total volume cryo-media added may be about 10% to about 25% of the sperm cell sample volume. For example, a 25 ml semen sample may require about 20% of cryo-media, thus the cryo-media volume is about 5 ml.
In some embodiments, the total cryo-media addition spans about 60 minutes for each batch. In other embodiments, the addition time may range from about 45 to 90 minutes. Since the total cryo-media volume changes as a function of the volume of sperm cell fluid, the flow rate is set based on target volume divided by the addition time. In one embodiment, the flow rate of the dispensed fluid, also referred to as addition rate, may range from about 0.01 ml/min to about 1 ml/min. For example, the flow rate may be 0.017-0.333 mL/min. In another embodiment, the flow rate may be about 0.01 ml/min to about 0.05 ml/min or about 0.05 ml/min to about 0.1 ml/min. In a further embodiment, the flow rate may be about 0.1 ml/min to about 1 ml/min or greater than 1 ml/min. Continuing with the previous example, 5 ml of cryo-media may be continuously added to the 25 ml semen sample in a span of about 60 minutes, thus the cryo-media flow rate is about 0.083 ml/min.
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, a continuous flow may refer to a smooth or non-discrete flow, a steady flow or an uninterrupted flow. In one embodiment, the pusher block (132) displaces the syringe (120) such that the cryoprotectant (102) is added to the biological specimen (104) at a continuous flow rate. For example, the motor moves the pusher block (132) at a specific step size such that the cryo-media flow rate is about 0.083 ml/min to continuously dispense 5 ml of cryo-media into a 25 ml semen sample in about 60 minutes as shown in
In other embodiments, the pusher block (132) can displace the syringe (120) such that the cryoprotectant (102) is added to the biological specimen (104) at a pulsed flow rate or an interrupted flow rate. A pulsed or interrupted flow rate refers to a flow rate in which there are discrete breaks in the flow; however, the flow is not drop wise. For example, 25% of the cryo-media volume is slowly and continuously added to the specimen in a span of 10 minutes, then paused for 5 minutes, and then repeated until the total volume of cryo-media is dispensed. As another example, 10% of the cryo-media volume is slowly and continuously added to the specimen in a span of 3-4 minutes, then paused for 2-3 minutes, and then repeated until the total volume of cryo-media is dispensed. Various non-limiting examples of pulsed or interrupted flow are shown in
In one embodiment, the accuracy in the addition may be a function of the syringe inside bore diameter, if the linear step size of the syringe pump is fixed. To achieve the same accuracy across a range of addition volumes, by percentage of delivered volume to target volume, multiple sized syringes can be used. In some embodiments, the control software specifies the size of syringe based on the volume of sperm cells. If the wrong syringe is placed on the system, the amount of cryoprotectant media delivered could be significantly greater or less than specified. This error amounts to significant loss of cells through either initial cell die off in this process (over-delivery) or increased die off measured after thawing of cryopreserved cells (under-delivery). This risk is mitigated by implementing an inductive position sensor (128) to determine an outside diameter of the syringe placed on the system. As shown in
In preferred embodiments, the syringe used in accordance with the present invention should be biocompatible with the specimen. The syringe should be free off lubricants or other substance that could be detrimental to sperm cells. A non-limiting example of a syringe that is suitable for use with the present invention is a NORM-JECT luer lock syringe. In some embodiments, the volumetric capacity of the syringe may range from about 2 ml to about 50 ml. In one embodiment, the volumetric capacity of the syringe may be about 2 ml to about 5 ml. In another embodiment, the volumetric capacity of the syringe may be about 5 ml to about 20 ml. In yet another embodiment, the volumetric capacity of the syringe may be about 20 ml to about 50 ml. In further embodiments, the volumetric capacity of the syringe may be greater than 50 ml.
In other embodiments, the dispense tube may be constructed from a plastic, rubber, or silicone material. For example, the dispense tube may be made of PVC, DEHP-Free PVC, Tygon®, C-flex®, high density polyethylene, platinum cured silicone, or peroxide cured silicone. Moreover, the tubing material may be medical grade quality. In one embodiment, the dispense tube may be constructed of PEEK with 1/16″ OD, 0.020″ ID. An inner diameter of the tube can vary in size, ranging from about 0.01″ to about 0.1″. For example, the inner diameter may be 0.020″. The dispense tube can be a predetermined length or alternatively cut to a required length to sufficiently span the distance between the syringe and vessel. In some embodiments, the tubing material may be opaque. Alternatively, the tubing material may be substantially transparent to allow for visibility into the tube, for instance, to visualize any blockage in the tube. In other embodiments, the dispense tube may be flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid. Tubing expansion under pressure may increase error to the target delivery volume. To ensure accuracy, the tube can have a high OD/ID ratio with a rigid material, thereby reducing the risk of tubing expansion.
In the prior arts, a suspended vessel with a stopcock or a buret for addition has physical limitations that prohibits submersion of the dispense tip. For instance, the typical opening size of the vessel or the size of buret tip limits the ability to submerge the tip. In addition, by using a buret, which is typically made of brittle glass, physical contact with a vessel wall would place a bending force on the glass putting it at risk for fracture. Radial agitation of the vessel would only increase the fracture risk. In contrast, the dispense tube of the present invention allows for submersion of the dispense tip as well as agitation of the vessel.
Once sperm cells are packaged for sale, each lot is tested for bacteria. If bacteria levels are above a threshold, the batch is not sold as it could introduce a health risk. Furthermore, prevention of cell cross-contamination between batches is paramount. Thus, there is a need to prevent the cryo-media from becoming contaminated with bacteria and/or other cells. The present invention addresses these concerns by using a reusable or disposable fluid path. Without wishing to be limited to a particular theory or mechanism, the entire fluid path can eliminate contamination risks from bacteria and cross-contamination between different specimens, e.g. bull-bull.
In some embodiments, the dispense tubing and vessel may be reused through a cleaning and autoclave process. In other embodiments, the syringe may be discarded after use. In preferred embodiments, the dispense tubing is submerged into the fluid containing the sperm cells. By submerging the end of the dispense tubing instead of suspending it, the addition rate is governed by the syringe pump rather than the adhesion forces of suspending a droplet from the end of the dispense tubing.
In further embodiments, the system (100) may also include a mixer (150) for mixing the cryoprotectant (102) and the biological specimen (104) contained in the vessel (110). Without wishing to limit the present invention, the mixer (150) can prevent the biological specimen (104) from adhering to the internal surface (112) of the vessel. In one embodiment, the mixer (150) may be a shaker table. As an example, the shaker table may comprise a stationary base and a moveable platform that can support the vessel. As shown in
As shown in
In other embodiments, the multiple dispense system may implement a plurality of controlled dispensers, such as syringe pumps, fluidly coupled to a single vessel. This may allow for a shorter processing time by dispensing the cryoprotectant fluid from multiple dispensers. Alternatively, the dispensers can dispense various fluids, such as cryoprotectants or gases, into the single vessel simultaneously or sequentially. For instance, the dispense system may include multiple syringe pumps that dispense various fluids into a single vessel for vitrification of sperm cells. Each of the fluids can be dispensed at their own independent flow rates and timing. In one embodiment, the dispense system may include a syringe pump that dispenses a cryoprotectant and a second controlled dispenser that dispenses gas into a single vessel. Each of the fluids can be dispensed at their own independent flow rates and timing. In one example, the multiple dispense system may be configured to dispense two or more different medias that are added to the cells such that delivery is defined similar to a recipe. The flow rates of each media may be varied independently and/or the delivery between the medias may be coordinated, such as ramping the flow rate.
In some embodiments, the vessel may be equipped with a cap that can create an air-tight seal such that a gas can be added and contained within the vessel. The cap may include a port for receiving the gas, as well as other ports for receiving liquids. As an example, preparation of a specimen for in-vitro fertilization may require lower oxygen concentrations and/or some type of gas coverage in the vessel to improve survivability. In one embodiment, the vessel may be sealed and purged with argon, CO2 and/or nitrogen, which may be added via one or more ports, each coupled to its own pump or gas regulator. A separate exit port may be used to maintain atmospheric conditions and prevent pressure build-up in the vessel. In another embodiment, the process may operate under reduced pressure by coupling a port to a vacuum pump. In some embodiments, the cryo-media can be added with the gas via a separate input port and pump. In conjunction with or alternative to the syringe pumps, other types of pumps, such as a microfluidic pump, centrifugal pump, compressor, gas regulator, or another kind of positive-displacement pump, may be used in accordance with the present invention to dispense the cryo-media, gases, or other fluids.
According to some embodiments, the dispense systems of the present invention may implement a temperature ramp during the cryopreservation process. When preparing the biological specimen for cryopreservation, the specimen and cryoprotectant are preferably in a temperature controlled environment. In a preferred embodiment, the specimen and cryoprotectant are maintained at a temperature of about 5° C. Any deviation in temperature should not exceed ±2° C. For example, the temperature deviation may be ±1° C. In some embodiments, the entire system may be located in a temperature controlled room. If a dedicated cold room is not available, at least the syringe pump and vessel may be contained in a temperature controlled chamber, such as a cold box, so as to maintain constant temperature of the specimen and cryoprotectant. In another embodiment, the vessel and/or syringe may be jacketed with a heating/cooling device. Temperature feedback may be implemented via a thermocouple or thermistor, which can be submerged in the specimen solution or attached to the vessel.
According to some aspects, the systems described herein may be utilized in methods for dispensing a cryoprotectant to a biological specimen as shown in
In another embodiment as shown in
fmax (ml/min)=0.0045*V, where V=volume of the biological specimen in ml.
Returning to the previous example, the fmax for 5 ml of cryoprotectant to be dispensed into the 25 ml semen sample is calculated to be 0.11 ml/min. Thus, the cryoprotectant flow rate should be less than or equal to 0.11 ml/min with a minimum dispense time of about 45 minutes. The previous example flow rate of 0.083 ml/min and dispense time of 60 minutes are within these parameters.
Referring now to
Consistent with the previous embodiments, the methods described herein may further include continuously or intermittently mixing the cryoprotectant (102) and the biological specimen (104) contained in the vessel (110). The cryoprotectant (102) and the biological specimen (104) may be mixed using any of the mixing equipment described herein. In further embodiments, the methods may also comprise adding one or more additional fluids to the vessel via activation of one or more additional controlled dispensers that are fluidly connected to the vessel, each dispenser containing one of the additional fluids. This method may utilize the multiple dispense system as previously described. In some embodiments, the one or more additional fluids may be cryoprotectants or gases. For example, a second fluid may be added to the vessel via activation of a second syringe pump which has a syringe containing the second fluid and is fluidly connected to the vessel.
Consistent with the previous embodiments, the methods described herein may further include weighing the vessel at the end of the addition to verify that the correct mass of cryoprotectant has been added. At this stage, if the mass is determined to be lower than it should be, additional cryoprotectant may be manually or automatically added in order to bring the total amount of cryoprotectant to the calculated amount. If the volume of the secondary, or manual, addition is large in comparison to the total calculated volume, it may be added in multiple sub-volume additions, with waiting time intervals between them. As a non-limiting example, if the volume of manual addition is up to 32% of the total volume the full remaining volume may be delivered in one addition. If the volume of the manual addition is 33-65% of the total volume, it may be divided into two equal quantities which are added with a 15 minute break between the additions. If the volume of the manual addition is equal or greater to 66% of the total volume, it may be divided into three equal quantities which are added with two 15 minute breaks between the additions.
In some aspects, the cryoprotectant may be toxic to the biological specimen, such as sperm cells, in high concentrations. Dispensing the cryoprotectant via bulk or drop-wise addition can deliver immediate high concentrations of the cryoprotectant to the cells that are closest to the entry location of the cryoprotectant prior to being diffused in the cell solution, thus resulting in cytotoxicity to the local cells. In other aspects, drop-wise addition of the cryoprotectant can lead to stress or physical damage due to the droplets striking the cells. Without wishing to limit the present invention to a particular theory or mechanism, the present invention allows for addition of the cryoprotectant in smaller volumes, via slow continuous flow, low-impact entry, and/or a determined flow rate, that reduce the local concentration so as to minimize cytotoxicity and cell stress.
In some embodiments, the dispensing system of the present invention may be used in a cold room or a large cold handling cabinet, so as to preserve sample viability. In an alternative embodiment, the system may be fit inside of a fridge or mini-fridge. Some components of the system, such as the frame, may need to be decreased in size so that the frame, main syringe pumps, and shaker table all fit inside the fridge or mini-fridge. In some embodiments, a secondary frame may be positioned outside of the fridge or mini-fridge (for example, on top of the fridge or mini-fridge) and components such as the computer, power supply, and monitor may be mounted to the secondary frame.
In some embodiments, the pump plunger may be designed so as to also act as a spring-loaded clamping piece that holds the syringes into the pump and block. Certain plungers and clamps may cause inconsistencies of measurement. As a non-limiting example, the sensor to tag distance of the unit may be altered, and may in turn cause the system to incorrectly identify what syringe was loaded into the pump. As such, specialty plungers may be advantageous. Additionally, specialty syringe pump covers may be advantageous so as to provide for safer cable management and easier maintenance removal.
The following is a non-limiting example of the present invention. It is to be understood that said example is not intended to limit the present invention in any way. Equivalents or substitutes are within the scope of the present invention.
The cryopreservation system was implemented and compared against a prior cryopreservation procedure. The cryoprotectant was added by the present system at a continuously flow rate, whereas the prior procedure involved three discrete additions spaced 15 minutes apart. The ratio of specimen volume to dispensed cryoprotectant volume was the same in both procedures. The present invention resulted in a 5% recovery of cells, thus the present invention provides, on average, 5% more cells than the prior procedure. Without wishing to limit the present invention to a particular theory or mechanism, the cryopreservation system reduced cell die off through cryopreservation freeze to thaw. Furthermore, the present invention resulted in an 8% increase in insemination dose in straws as compared to the prior procedure.
As used herein, the term “about” refers to plus or minus 10% of the referenced number.
Although there has been shown and described the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made thereto which do not exceed the scope of the appended claims. Therefore, the scope of the invention is only to be limited by the following claims. In some embodiments, the figures presented in this patent application are drawn to scale, including the angles, ratios of dimensions, etc. In some embodiments, the figures are representative only and the claims are not limited by the dimensions of the figures. In some embodiments, descriptions of the inventions described herein using the phrase “comprising” includes embodiments that could be described as “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of”, and as such the written description requirement for claiming one or more embodiments of the present invention using the phrase “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of” is met.
The reference numbers recited in the below claims are solely for ease of examination of this patent application, and are exemplary, and are not intended in any way to limit the scope of the claims to the particular features having the corresponding reference numbers in the drawings.
This application is a non-provisional application and claims benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/835,676, filed Apr. 18, 2019, the specification of which is incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3390449 | Fox | Jul 1968 | A |
3649829 | Randolph | Mar 1972 | A |
3661460 | Elking et al. | May 1972 | A |
3710933 | Fulwyler et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3764901 | Kachel | Oct 1973 | A |
3791517 | Friedman | Feb 1974 | A |
3863962 | Thomas et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4175662 | Zold | Nov 1979 | A |
4325706 | Gershman et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4395397 | Shapiro | Jul 1983 | A |
4409106 | Furuta et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4424132 | Iriguchi | Jan 1984 | A |
4660971 | Sage et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4667830 | Nozaki, Jr. et al. | May 1987 | A |
4765737 | Harris et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4885473 | Shofner et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4919817 | Schoendorfer et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4983038 | Ohki et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5007732 | Ohki et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5030002 | North, Jr. | Jul 1991 | A |
5100627 | Buican et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5125749 | Eugers et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5135759 | Johnson | Aug 1992 | A |
5180065 | Touge et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194909 | Tycko | Mar 1993 | A |
5229297 | Schnipelsky et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5483469 | Van den engh et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491550 | Dabbs | Feb 1996 | A |
5620857 | Weetall et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5674743 | Ulmer | Oct 1997 | A |
5689109 | Schultze | Nov 1997 | A |
5752606 | Wilson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5800690 | Chow et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5837115 | Austin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5849178 | Holm et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858187 | Ramsey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5879625 | Rosianiec et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5966457 | Lemelson | Oct 1999 | A |
5985216 | Rens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008010 | Greenberger et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6053856 | Hlavinka | Apr 2000 | A |
6071442 | Dean et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6146897 | Cohenford et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159739 | Weigl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159749 | Yagang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171865 | Weigl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185664 | Jeddeloh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213151 | Jacobson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
H1960 | Conrad et al. | Jun 2001 | H |
6368871 | Christel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416190 | Grier et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416959 | Giuliano et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432630 | Blankenstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451264 | Bhullar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494230 | Chow | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6506609 | Wada | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519032 | Kuebler et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519954 | Prien et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524860 | Seidel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540895 | Spence et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549275 | Cabuz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6592821 | Wada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6637463 | Lei et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6674525 | Bardell et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6727451 | Fuhr et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6808075 | Bohm et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833542 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838056 | Foster | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841388 | Dukor et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853654 | Mcdonald et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877528 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6944324 | Tran et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6976590 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7029430 | Hlavinka et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069943 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092154 | Yasuda et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104405 | Böhm et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7208265 | Schenk | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7195920 | Seidel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7241988 | Gruber et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7276701 | Lendl | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298478 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300803 | Lin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311476 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312085 | Chou et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7355696 | Mueth et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355699 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7466734 | Day et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472794 | Oakey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482577 | Gruber et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492522 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7524681 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7569788 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576861 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584857 | Böhm et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7611309 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7670471 | Quake et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697576 | Maier et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7760351 | Cox et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7820425 | Schenk | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826509 | Belkin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7956328 | Sundaram et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963399 | Böhm et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7997831 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032200 | Tearney et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8080422 | Neas et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8123044 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8149402 | Rich | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8158122 | Hampson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8173001 | Quake et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8174394 | Ridder et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8198092 | Durack et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206987 | Durack et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209987 | Hautman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8210209 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8277764 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8388822 | Quake et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408399 | Böhm et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8502148 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529161 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8563325 | Bartsch et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8567608 | Deshpande et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8569069 | Durack | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8623295 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8727131 | Deshpande et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731860 | Charles et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8941062 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8961904 | Xia et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8964184 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8981298 | Wagner et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9000357 | Mueth et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9003869 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011797 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9109195 | Zimmermann et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9140690 | Mueth et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9255874 | Sharpe et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9260693 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9335247 | Sharpe et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9335295 | Mueth et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9339850 | Deshpande et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9365822 | Seidel et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9377400 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9446912 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9485984 | Burbank | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9550215 | Deshpande et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9588100 | Appleyard et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9618442 | Sharpe et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9683922 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
D791338 | Morkos et al. | Jul 2017 | S |
9752976 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9781918 | Zimmermann | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9802767 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9823252 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9835552 | Wagner | Dec 2017 | B2 |
D815754 | Morkos et al. | Apr 2018 | S |
9943847 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9964968 | Sharpe et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10025322 | Ofstrom et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10029283 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10175159 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10180388 | Wagner | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10216144 | Mueth et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10315194 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
11187224 | Xia et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11193879 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11243494 | Mueth et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
20020027649 | Chudner | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042042 | Fahy | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058332 | Quake et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020106716 | Leboeuf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115208 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020176069 | Hansen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198928 | Bukshpan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007894 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032204 | Walt et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047676 | Grier et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054365 | Xu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054558 | Kurabayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068646 | Singh et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030113709 | Alivisatos et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030175944 | Yang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030175980 | Hayenga et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186426 | Brewer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040043506 | Haussecker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079893 | Dietz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089798 | Gruber et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040144648 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161772 | Bohm et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166504 | Rossier et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040206399 | Heller et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217297 | Moses et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229349 | Daridon | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266022 | Sundararajan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050037471 | Liu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061962 | Mueth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050103690 | Kawano et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112541 | Durack et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050121604 | Mueth et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050123450 | Gilbert | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124869 | Hefti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148085 | Larsen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153354 | Gilmanshin | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190372 | Dogariu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196876 | Chan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207940 | Butler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207943 | Puzey | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060013270 | Yumoto et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060035273 | Quake et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043301 | Mantele et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058167 | Regusa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078888 | Griffiths | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105453 | Brenan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060152707 | Kanda | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170912 | Mueth et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060252047 | Ekstrom et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257089 | Mueth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263829 | Evans et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009386 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078348 | Holman | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114172 | Mueth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128082 | Yang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070207551 | Glensbjerg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070247620 | Koo | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248958 | Jovanovich et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255362 | Levinson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080003685 | Goix et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014574 | Viator et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021674 | Puskas | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080069733 | Maltezo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080144037 | Mueth et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080166188 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195020 | Cabuz et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080213821 | Liu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080248966 | Hansen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261295 | Butler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080292555 | Ye et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299013 | Trieu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309919 | Birmingham et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080311005 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090004652 | Rubin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029870 | Ward et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032449 | Mueth et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090042241 | Yu-Chong et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051912 | Salazar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090114285 | Hashimoto et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125242 | Choi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141279 | Hillmer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156932 | Zharov | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090170149 | Viator et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090176271 | Durack et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201504 | Ho et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225319 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090281250 | DeSimone et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290156 | Popescu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100044570 | McGill et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100068723 | Jovanovich et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079516 | Nakazawa | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100167336 | Son et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100171954 | Quake et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100216208 | Mueth et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100248362 | Durack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100330693 | Chapin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001963 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003303 | Pagano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003324 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003325 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003330 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008764 | Silva et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008767 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008817 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008818 | Durack | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110075928 | Jeong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076712 | Gilligan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090500 | Hu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096327 | Papautsky et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110190146 | Boehm et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110223654 | Holman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256523 | Mendele et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110263747 | Doyle et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110294139 | Takeda | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120009619 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028366 | Krager et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033220 | Kotidis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033697 | Goyal et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120081709 | Durack | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120082362 | Diem et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120107805 | Neas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120122084 | Wagner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138152 | Villamuel et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120183947 | Mueth et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196356 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120199741 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120199742 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202237 | Sedoglavich et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202277 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202278 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204628 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120225474 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120225475 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120273054 | Lou et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287419 | Sharpe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295263 | Cantor et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307244 | Lou et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130121877 | Ono | May 2013 | A1 |
20130164731 | Cimino | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164773 | Bardell et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130200277 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224843 | Evans et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252237 | Wagner | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130295602 | Fowler | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313170 | Bohm et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140033808 | Ding et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140050540 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140091014 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140224710 | Di Carlo et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140273192 | Sharpe | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287243 | Weber et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140318645 | Koksal | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140339446 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361148 | Popescu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150064694 | Sadri | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150114093 | Appleyard et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150192511 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198517 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150276588 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160004060 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160123858 | Kapur et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160199835 | Tachibana et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170016813 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170181425 | Burbank | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170333902 | Masaeli | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180266937 | de Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190025212 | Evans | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190040356 | Durack et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190071725 | Roti-Roti et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190160439 | Muto et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190187044 | Appleyard et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190390164 | Morjal et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200070152 | Kasai et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20220025443 | Korani et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220026341 | Appleyard et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1341328 | Dec 2001 | CA |
2125369 | Dec 1992 | CN |
1482369 | Mar 2004 | CN |
1886315 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101189504 | May 2008 | CN |
203952247 | Nov 2014 | CN |
105532638 | May 2016 | CN |
205323294 | Jun 2016 | CN |
105831105 | Aug 2016 | CN |
206014950 | Mar 2017 | CN |
207418761 | May 2018 | CN |
109221081 | Jan 2019 | CN |
109497040 | Mar 2019 | CN |
109517787 | Mar 2019 | CN |
0057907 | Aug 1982 | EP |
0282994 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0679325 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0471758 | Sep 1996 | EP |
2798557 | Mar 2001 | FR |
502971 | May 1939 | GB |
2507959 | May 2014 | GB |
57-131451 | Aug 1982 | JP |
58090513 | May 1983 | JP |
S 64-26125 | Jan 1989 | JP |
64074451 | Mar 1989 | JP |
02105041 | Apr 1990 | JP |
03297385 | Dec 1991 | JP |
H0526799 | Feb 1993 | JP |
06265452 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06327494 | Nov 1994 | JP |
07024309 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07286953 | Oct 1995 | JP |
2552582 | Nov 1996 | JP |
H10512952 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H11508182 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000146819 | May 2000 | JP |
2000512541 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001504936 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002503334 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002153260 | May 2002 | JP |
2003106980 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003515738 | May 2003 | JP |
2004093553 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005502482 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005530986 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006524054 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-514522 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007148981 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007514522 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007515936 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008533440 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008261295 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009085872 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009115672 | May 2009 | JP |
2010117197 | May 2010 | JP |
2010151777 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010190680 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2011145185 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2014503195 | Feb 2014 | JP |
WO9622521 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO9700442 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO1997030338 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9739338 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO9747390 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9810267 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9939223 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO20000070080 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0118400 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0131315 | May 2001 | WO |
WO2001040766 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0185913 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO2002006778 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO200241906 | May 2002 | WO |
WO2002081183 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02087792 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03024163 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03062867 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO03078065 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2003078065 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO2004012133 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004029221 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004043506 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004088283 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO20040088283 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005023391 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005075629 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO20050075629 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2006119806 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO20060119806 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007008495 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007133710 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008114458 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2008126064 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008130977 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009032449 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009134395 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2010129441 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2012068287 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012112641 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO20120112641 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO20130018273 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO2013173446 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO2005037471 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015038494 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO2015063552 | May 2015 | WO |
WO2018047011 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO2018047011 | May 2018 | WO |
WO2018151680 | Aug 2018 | WO |
WO2020092321 | May 2020 | WO |
WO2020182193 | Sep 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/741,608, dated Oct. 21, 2021, 11 pages. |
Trial Transcript, Sep. 5, 2019 (a.m.); ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case Nos. 17-cv-446 and 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. |
Brief in Support of ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Rule 50(8) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial, ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case No. 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Filed Sep. 2, 2016. |
Inguran, LLC and XY, LLC's Response to ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Rule 50(8) Motion Fof Judgment as a Matter of Law and Rule 59 Motion for New Trial, pp. 9-28, 33-36, 73-74. Filed Sep. 23, 2016. |
ST's Response to ABS's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the '987 Patent Are Invalid for Lack of Enablement and, in the Alternative, for a New Trial, ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case No. 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Filed: Jul. 24, 2020. |
Clinical Laboratory Instruments and In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents, Personnel Department of the State Food and Drug Administration, et al., pp. 17-21, China Medical Science and Technology Publishing House, Oct. 31, 2010). |
DiCarlo “Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels” BioMEMS Resource Center, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Nov. 27, 2007, PNAS, 18892-18897, vol. 104, No. 48. |
DiCarlo “Equilibrium Separation and Filtration of Particles Using Differential Inertial Focusing” BioMEMS Resource Center, Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Anal Chem 2008, 8, 2204-2211. |
DiCarlo “Inertial Microfluidics: High-Throughput Focusing and Separation of Cells and Particles” BioMEMS Resource Center, Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Twelfth International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, Oct. 12-16, 2008, San Diego, California, USA. |
Altendorf et al., “Results Obtained Using a Prototype Microfluidics-Based Hematology Analyzer,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 1998 Symposium, 73-76 (Oct. 1998). |
Nieuwenhuis et al., “Particle-Shape Sensing-Elements for Integrated Flow Cytometer,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 2001 Symposium, 357-358 (Oct. 21, 2001). |
Nieuwenhuis et al. “Virtual Flow Channel: A Novel Micro-fluidics System with Orthogonal, Dynamic Control of Sample Flow Dimensions,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 2002 Symposium, vol. 1, 103-105 (Nov. 3, 2002). |
Nieuwenhuis, J., et al. “Integrated flow-cells for novel adjustable sheath flows.” Lab Chip, 2003, 3, 56-61 (Mar. 2003. |
Shoji, S., et al. “Design and fabrication of micromachined chemical/biochemical systems.” Riken Rev., vol. 36, pp. 8-11, 2001. |
Lin, C., et al. “A Novel Microflow Cytometer with 3-dimensional Focusing Utilizing Dielectrophoretic and Hydrodynamic Forces.” The Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2003. MEMS-03 Kyoto IEEE, Kyoto, Japan, 2003, pp. 439-442. |
Miyake et al., “A Development of Micro Sheath Flow Chamber,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems Workshop 1991, 265-270 (Jan. 1991). |
Tashiro et al., “Design and Simulation of Particles and Biomolecules Handling Micro Flow Cells with Three-Dimensional Sheath Flow,” in Proceedings of the microTAS 2000 Symposium, 209-212 (May 14, 2000). |
Weigl, B. et al. “Design and Rapid Prototyping of Thin-Film Laminate-Based Microfluidic Devices.” Biomedical Microdevices, 3:4, pp. 267-274, 2001. |
Blankenstein, G. et al. “Modular concept of a laboratory on a chip for chemical and biochemical analysis.” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 13. No 3-4, pp. 427-438, 1998. |
Shapiro, Practical Flow Cytometry, 15-17, 133-135 (3rd ed. 1995). |
Shapiro, Practical Flow Cytometry, 55-57, 166-169 (4th ed. 2003). |
International Search Report for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2014/001425 dated Apr. 28, 2015. |
Herweijer, H. et al., “High Speed Photodamage Cell Selection Using Bromodeoxyuridine/Hoechst 33342 Photosensitized Cell Killing”, Radiobiological Institute TNO, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Jun. 1, 1987. |
Johnson, L.A., et al., “Sex Preselection: High-Speed Flow Cytometric Sorting of X and Y Sperm for Maximum Efficiency” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, Sep. 23, 1999. |
Bazyer H., et al., “Views and Reviews—Compact 151W Green Laser with U-Type Resonator for Prostate Surgery”, Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 47, Apr. 27, 2013, 237-241. |
Keij, J. et al., “High-Speed Photodamage Cell Sorting: An Evaluation of the Zapper Prototype”, Methods in Cell Biology, 1994; pp. 371-386, vol. 42, Chapter 22, Academic Press, Inc. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2014 in connection with PCT/US2013/050669. |
Kachel, V, et al., “Uniform Lateral Orientation, caused by Flow Forces, of Flat Particles in Flow-Through Systems”, The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 774-780, 1977. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/943,322 dated Sep. 12, 2014. |
Fulwler, M., “Hydrodynamic Orientation of Cells”, The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 781-783, 1977. |
Khodjakov A., et al., “A Synergy of Technologies: Combining Laser Microsurgery with Green Fluorescent Protein Tagging”, Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 38:311-317 (1997), Division of Molecular Medicine and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Albany, New York. |
Canadian Office Action, Application No. 2,929,275, dated May 4, 2020, 8 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2019202882, dated Mar. 26, 2020, 3 pages. |
Brazilian Office Action, Application No. BR122017012966-0, dated Jun. 2, 2020, 6 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Reconsideration Report by Examiner before Appeal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-551082, dated Jul. 12, 2019, 17 pages. 20090114285. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015, dated Jan. 20, 2020, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with patent application No. 19182993.6, dated Oct. 21, 2019, 11 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Nov. 26, 2018, 34 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Decision of Rejection,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 19 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2014343391, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued in connection with application PCT/IB/001425, dated May 3, 2016, 11 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Non Final Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-551082, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 5 pages. |
New Zealand IP Office, “First Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 720575, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 5 pages. |
New Zealand IP Office, “Further Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 720575, dated Apr. 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification of First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Mar. 16, 2018, 31 pages. |
New Zealand IP Office, “Further Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 735496, dated Aug. 31, 2018, 2 pages. |
Drobnis et al., Cold Shock Damage is due to Lipid Phase Transitions in Cell Membranes: A Demonstration Using Sperm as a Model, The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1993, 265:432-437. |
Way et al., Comparison of four staining methods for evaluating acrosome status and viability of ejaculated and cauda epididymal bull spermatozoa, Theriogenology, 1995, 43(8): 1301-1316. |
Marian et al., Hypo-osmotic Shock Induces an Osmolality-dependent Permeabilization and Structural Changes in the Membrane of Carp Sperm, 1993, 41(2):291-297. |
Molecular Probes Inc., Product Information, Influx Pinocy1ic Cell-Loading Reagent (1-14402), Revised Feb. 1, 2001, 1-7. |
Parks, Processing and Handling Bull Semen for Artificial Insemination—Don't Add Insult to Injury!, Department of Animal Sciences, Cornell University, 2001, retrieved on May 29, 2015, retrieved from the internet: http://www/ansci.cornell.edu/bullsemen.pdf. |
Mammal (Online Datasheet), Wikipedia, 2003, retrieved on Aug. 13, 2018, retrieved from internet: http://web.archive.org/web/20031230110838/hllps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammal. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2016/000295, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 19 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2016/000295, dated Aug. 31, 2017, 14 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-543990, dated Jul. 31, 2019, 23 pages. |
Di Carlo et al. “Equilibrium Separation and Filtration of Particles Using Differential Inertial Focusing” Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 2204-2211 (Year: 2008). |
Hydraulic Diameter, Neutrium, Apr. 1, 2012, https://neutrium.net/fluid-flow/hydraulic-diameter/ (Year: 2012). |
Gossett et al. “Particle Focusing Mechanisms in Curving Confined Flows” Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 8459-8465 (Year: 2009). |
Di Carlo et al. “Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels” PNAS Nov. 27, 2007 vol. 104 No. 48 18893 (Year: 2007). |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/403,642, dated Nov. 29, 2021, 13 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 201917009874, dated Nov. 25, 2021, 6 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2017323502, dated Oct. 22, 2021, 6 pages. |
Al-Holy et al., “The Use of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy to Differentiate Escherichia Coli O157:H7 from Other Bacteria Inoculated Into Apple Juice,” Food Microbiology, vol. 23, 2006, 162-168. |
Alberts et al., “Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th edition,” New York: Garland Science, 2008, p. 1293. |
Barcot et al., “Investigation of Spermatozoa and Seminal Plasma by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 61, No. 3, Mar. 2007, pp. 309-313. |
Bassan et al; “Reflection Contributions to the Dispersion Artefact in FTIR Spectra of Single Biological Cells,” Analyst, vol. 134, Apr. 9, 2009, pp. 1171-1175. |
Bassan et al; “Resonant Mie Scattering in Infrared Spectrascopy of Biological Materials-Understanding the Dispersion Artefact',” Analyst, vol. 134, 2009, pp. 1586-1593. |
Bassan et al; “Resonant Mie Scattering {RMieS) Correction of Infrared Spectra From Highly Scattering Biological Samples,” Analyst, vol. 135, No. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 268-277. |
Belkin et al.; “Intra-Cavity Absorption Spectroscopy with Narrow-Ridge Microfluidic Quantum Cascade Lasers,”Applies Express, vol. 15, No. 18, Sep. 3, 2007, pp. 11262-11271. |
Boustany et al.; “Microscopic Imaging and Spectroscopy with Scattered Light,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 12, 2010, pp. 285-314. |
Chan et al.; “Nondestructive Identification of Individual Leukemia Cells by Laser Trapping Raman Spectroscopy,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, No. 6, Mar. 15, 2008, 8 pages. |
Chan et al.; “Label-Free Biochemical Characterization of Stem Cells Using Vibrational Spectroscopy,” Journal of Biophotonics vol. 2, No. 11, Aug. 5, 2009, pp. 656-668. |
Chan et al.; “Label-Free Separation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells {hESCs} and their Cardiac Derivatives using Raman Spectroscopy,” Lawrence Livermore Journal, LLNL-JRNL-406938, Sep. 11, 2008, 30 pages. |
Chen et al,; “Synchrotron Infrared Measurements of Protein Phosphorylation in Living Single PC12 Cells during Neuronal Differentiation,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 84, 2012, pp. 4118-4125. |
Cheng et al., “Laser-Scanning Coherent Anti-Strokes Raman Scattering Microscopy and Applications to Cell Biology,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 83, Jul. 2002, pp. 502-509. |
Cho et al., “Passively Driven Integrated Microfluidic System for Separation of Motile Sperm,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 75, Apr. 1, 2003, Abstract. |
Cho et al., A Microfluidic Device For Separating Motile Sperm From Nonmotile Sperm Via Inter-Streamline. |
Cleary et al., “Infrared Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor,” OSA Biomed, Miami, Florida, Apr. 2010, 6 pages. |
Dousseau et al., “On the Spectral Subtraction of Water from the FT-IR Spectra of Aqueous Solutions of Proteins,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 43, No. 3, 1989, pp. 538-542. |
Downes et al., “Optical Spectroscopy for Noninvasive Monitoring of Stem Cell Differentation,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2010, Article ID 101864, 2010, 10 pages. |
Ege, “Organic Chemistry: Structure and Reactivity,” Fifth Edition, Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004, pp. 453-457. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 11841869.8, dated Feb. 15, 2018, 9 pages. |
Fu et al., “A Microfabricated Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 17, Nov. 1999, pp. 1109-1111. |
Green et al., “Flow Cytometric Determination of Size and Complex Refractive Index for Marine Particles: Comparison with Independent and Bulk Estimates,” Applied Optics, vol. 42, No. 3, Jan. 20, 2003, pp. 526-541. |
Harvey et al., “Discrimination of Prostate Cancer Cells by Reflection Mode FTIR Photoacoustic Spectroscopy,” The Analyst, vol. 132, 2007, pp. 292-295. |
Herzenberg et al., “Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting,” Scientific American, vol. 234, Mar. 1976, pp. 108-117. |
Holman et al., “Synchrotron-Based FTIR Spectromicroscopy: Cytotoxicity and Heating Considerations,” Journal of Biological Physics, vol. 29, 2003, pp. 275-286. |
Holman et al., “IR Spectroscopic Characteristics of Cell Cycle and Cell Death Probed by Synchrotron Radiation Based Fourier Transform IR Spectromicroscopy,” Biopolymers (Biospectroscopy) vol. 57, 2000, pp. 329-335. |
Holman et al., “Tracking Chemical Changes in a Live Cell: Biomedical Applications of SR-FTIR Spectromicroscopy, ”Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9k185794, Berkeley, CA Jul. 25, 2002, 34 pages. |
Huser et al., “Raman Spectroscopy of DNA Packaging in Individual Human Sperm Cells Distinguishes Normal From Abnormal Cells,” Journal of Biophotonics, vol. 2, No. 5, 2009, pp. 322-332. |
Intel, “Intel C-bank Tunable Laser, Performance and Design,” White Paper, May 2003, 14 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/41123, dated Aug. 19, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Search Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/061046, dated May 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/041123, dated Nov. 18, 2014, 7 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-539983, dated Jul. 8, 2015, 6 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-539983, dated Jul. 2, 2016, 6 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-198323, dated Oct. 2, 2017, 3 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-198323, dated Jul. 25, 2018, 9 pages. |
Lee et al., “DFB Quantum Cascade Laser Arrays,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 45, No. 5, May 9, pp. 554-565. |
Ibbus et al., “Incidence of Chromosome Aberrations in Mammalian Sperm Stained with Hoechst 33342 and UV- aser Irradiated During Flow Sorting,” Mutation Research, vol. 182, 1987, pp. 265-274. |
Malone, Jr., “Infrared Microspectroscopy: A Study of the Single Isolated Bread Yeast Cell,” Thesis, The Ohio State University, 2010, 162 pages. |
Meister et al., “Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy as an Analytical Tool to Assess the Mitochondral Status in Human Spermatozoa,” Analyst, vol. 135, 2010, pp. 1370-1374. |
Miyamoto et al., “Label-free Detection and Classification of DNA by Surface Vibration Spectroscopy in Conjugation with Electrophoresis,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, No. 053902, 2005, 3 pages. |
Mohlenhoff et al., “Mie-Type Scattering and Non-Beer-Lambert Absorption Behavior of Human Cells in Infared Microspectroscopy,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 88, May 2005, pp. 3635-3640. |
Montag et al., “Laser-induced Immobilization and Plasma Membrane Permeabilization in Human Spermatozoa,” Human Reproduction, vol. 15, No. 4, 2000, pp. 846-852. |
Mourant et al., “Methods for Measuring the Infrared Spectra of Biological Cells,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 48, 2003, pp. 243-257. |
Van Munster, “Interferometry in Flow to Sort Unstained X-and Y-Chromosome-Bearing Bull Spermatozoa,”Cytometry, vol. 47, 2002, pp. 192-199. |
Rajagopalan et al., “Aneuploidy and Cancer,” Nature, vol. 432, Nov. 2004, pp. 338-341. |
Ropcke et al., “Application of Mid-Infrared Tuneable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy to Plasma Diagnostics: A Review,” Plasma Sources Science and Technology, vol. 15, 2006, S148-S168. |
Schaden et al., “Quantum Cascade Laser Modulation for Correction of Matrix-Induced Background Changes in Aqueous Samples,” Applied Physics B, vol. 86, 2007, pp. 347-351. |
Sandt et al., “Identification of Spectral Modifications Occurring during Reprogramming of Somatic Cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Issue 4, e30743, Apr. 2012, 7 pages. |
Jokinen, Ville, et al. “Durable superhydrophobicity in embossed CYTOP fluoropolymer micro and nanostructures”, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 434, 2013, pp. 207-212. |
Forsberg, Pontus, Fredrik Nikolajeff, and Mikael Karlsson, “Cassie-Wenzel and Wenzel-Cassie transitions on immersed superhydrophobic surfaces under hydrostatic pressure”, Soft Matter, vol. 7, No. 1, 2011, pp. 104-109. |
Lu, Hang, Martin A. Schmidt, and Klavs F. Jensen, “Photochemical reactions and on-line UV detection in microfabricated reactors”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 1, No. 1, 2001, pp. 22-28. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-513891, dated Jun. 24, 2021, 11 pages. |
Brazilian Office Action, Application No. BR112019004727-1, dated Jul. 6, 2021, 4 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2017323502, dated Jun. 28, 2021, 6 pages. |
China Office Action, Application No. 201780056064.5, dated Apr. 26, 2021, 8 pages. |
China Office Action, Application No. 201780056064.5, dated Nov. 4, 2020 11 pages. |
Europe Office Action, Application No. 17808998.3, dated Jul. 21, 2020. |
Pedreira Carlos E et al.: “Overview of clinical flow cytometry data analysis: recent advances and future challenges”, Trends in Biotechnology, Elsevier Publications, Cambridge, GB, vol. 31, No. 7, Jun. 5, 2013. |
China Patent Office, “The Third Office Action,” issued in connection with China Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Jul. 23, 2020, 23 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 3429/DELNP/2015, dated Mar. 26, 2018, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “ European Search Report,” issued in connection with patent application No. 20167363.9, dated Jul. 21, 2020, 9 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japan Patent Application No. 2018-220397, dated Aug. 5, 2020, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 16723498.8, dated Oct. 12, 2020, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 14168200.5, dated Mar. 20, 2015, 12 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 17172322.4, dated Aug. 24, 2017, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 15160613.4, dated Jul. 24, 2015, 14 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 17172322.4, dated Aug. 14, 2018, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 11193936.9, dated Dec. 11, 2015, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 15160613.4, dated Jul. 11, 2016, 4 pages. |
Hori et al., “Cell fusion by optical trapping with laser-involves contacting different cells with each other then imparting high voltage pulse to cells,” WPI/Thompson, Dec. 27, 1991, Abstract, 1 page. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notification of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-185743, dated Jul. 3, 2018, 7 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Final Notification of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-256171, dated Oct. 28, 2014, 5 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Decision for Grant,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-091320, dated May 6, 2017, 7 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Final Notification of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-091320, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 22 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notification of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-185743, dated Jul. 26, 2017, 2 pages. |
Smith et al., “Inexpensive Optical Tweezers for Undergraduate Laboratories,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 67, No. 1, Jan. 1999, 10 pages. |
Takayama et al., “Patterning Cells and Their Environments Using Multiple Laminar Fluid Flows in Capillary Networks,” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, vol. 96, 1999, 4 pages. |
Ts'O, Basic Principles in Nucleic Acid Chemistry, National Library of Medicine, 1974, pp. 311-387. |
Japan Patent Office; “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,”issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-088655, dated Feb. 18, 2020, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/050669, dated Jan. 28, 2016, 15 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,551, dated May 22, 2017, 12 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201380079634.4, dated Jun. 4, 2018, 14 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-168904, dated Jul. 6, 2018, 3 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Third Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201380079634.4, dated Nov. 1, 2018, 20 pages. |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2016-527978 dated Mar. 28, 2017, 8 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201380079634.4, dated Jul. 28, 2017, 18 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre-Grant Opposition, mailed Dec. 4, 2020, 138 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre-Grant Opposition, mailed Jul. 21, 2020, 59 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre-Grant Opposition, mailed Jul. 21, 2020, 96 pages. |
Indian Patent Application No. 3425/DELNP/2015 Pre- Grant Opposition, mailed Jul. 2, 2020, 137 pages. |
Sell, “Cellular Origin of Cancer: Dedifferentiation or Stem Cell Maturation Arrest?”, Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 101, Suppl. 5, 1993, p. 15-26. |
Shapiro et al., “Pratical Flow Cytometry,” Fourth Edition, New Jersey: John W. Wiley & Sons, 2003, 733 pages. |
Sharpe et al., “Advances in Flow Cytometry for Sperm Sexing,” Theriogenology, vol. 71, 2009, pp. 4-10. |
Short, “Raman Spectroscopy Detects Biochemical Changes Due to Proliferation in Mammalian Cell Cultures,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 88, Jun. 2005, pp. 4274-4288. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/226,899, dated Apr. 12, 2018, 14 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/226,899, dated Aug. 23, 2018, 5 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/226,899, dated Sep. 20, 2018, 6 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated Jan. 2, 2018, 15 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated Sep. 14, 2018, 17 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated May 4, 2017, 13 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 16 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,681, dated Nov. 27, 2018, 10 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Oct. 18, 2013, 46 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Feb. 5, 2013, 66 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Sep. 19, 2014, 9 pages. |
USPTO, “Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,148, dated Sep. 28, 2012, 5 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Sep. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Jun. 15, 2017, 19 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Dec. 23, 2014, 11 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Oct. 5, 2016, 17 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 8 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/894,831, dated Sep. 5, 2017, 9 pages. |
Wang et al., Detection of endogenous biomolecules in Barrett's esophagus by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, PNAS, vol. 104, No. 40, Oct. 2, 2007, p. 15864-15869. |
Webster, Merriam, “Definition of “successive,” Merriam Webster's Online Dictionary, accessed at http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/successive,” Jun. 18, 2013, 1 page. |
Weida et al., “Quantum Cascade Laser Based Replacement for FTIR Microscopy,” http://www.daylightsolutions. :: om/assets/003/5308.pdf, accessed online Aug. 2, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2017/001289, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application Serial No. PCT/IP2017/001289, dated Apr. 3, 2018, 21 pages. |
Mehrnoush Malek et al: flowDensity: reproducing manual gating of flow cytometry data by automated density-based cell population identification11 , Bioinformatics., vol. 31, No. 4, Oct. 16, 2014 (Oct. 16, 2014), pp. 606-607. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application Serial No. PCT/IB2018/001641, dated Jun. 25, 2020 4 pages. |
China Patent Office, “The Fourth Office Action,” issued in connection with China Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Jan. 3, 2021, 25 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Refusal,” issued in connection with Japan Patent Application No. 2019-088655, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 5 pages. |
Johnson LA et al., Flow sorting of X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa into two populations, Gamete Research. Jan. 1987. 16(1):1-9. (Johnson 1987). |
Paape et al., Flow Cytometry: A Versatile Tool for Studies on Cells From Domestic Animals, National Cytometry Symposium, Abstract Only, Dec. 14, 1997, https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=86408. |
Keij, J.F. et al., “High-Speed Photodamage Cell Selection Using a Frequency-Doubled Argon Ion Laser.” Cytometry 19 (1995): 209-216. (Keij 1995). |
Keij, J.F., “Introduction to High-Speed Flow Sorting.” Flow and Image Cytometry. Series H: Cell Biology, 95 (1996): 213-227. (Keij 1996). |
Johnson LA, Welch GR, Rens W. “The Beltsville sperm sexing technology: high-speed sperm sorting gives improved sperm output for in vitro fertilization and AI.” J Anim Sci 1999. 77:213-220. |
Counterclaim Defendants ABS Global Inc.'s And Genus PLC's Invalidity Contentions. ABS Global, Inc., v. Inguran, LLC D/B/A Sexing Technologies and. XY, LLC v. Genus PLC. Case No. 14-cv-503 United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin; pp. 1, 43-114, and 168-177. |
ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the '987 Patent Are Invalid for Lack of Enablement and, in the Alternative, for a New Trial. ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC & XY, LLC v. Genus PLC. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed on Jul. 3, 2020. |
Brief in Support of ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the '987 Patent Are Not Enabled. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Stgenetics, XY, LLC, and Cytonome/ST, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, v. ABS Global, Inc., Genus PLC, and Premium Genetics (UK) LTD, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. Case: 3:17-cv-00446 wmc. Filed Sep. 6, 2019. |
ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the 987 Patent Are Invalid for Lack of Enablement and, in the Alternative, for a New Trial. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Stgenetics, XY, LLC, and Cytonome/ST, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, v. ABS Global, Inc., Benus PLC, and Premium Genetics (UK) LTD, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. Case: 3:17-cv-00446-wmc. filed Jul. 3, 2020. |
ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Reply in Support of Their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the '987 Patent Are Invalid for Lack of Enablement and, in the Alternative, for a New Trial. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Stgenetics, XY, LLC, and Cytonome/ST, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, v. ABS Global, Inc., Genus PLC, and Premium Genetics (UK) LTD, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. Case: :17-cv-00446-wmc. Filed Aug. 17, 2020. |
ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That the Asserted Claims of the 987 and '092 Patents Are Invalid. ABS Global, Inc., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Genus PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed Aug. 9, 2016. |
ABS Global, Inc. and Genus PLC's Rule 50(8) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial. ABS Global, Inc., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, V. Benus PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed Sep. 2, 2016. |
Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Genus PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. filed Mar. 31, 2017. |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 14-CV-503. ABS Global, NC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and Genus PLC, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. Inguran, LLC, doing business as Sexing Technologies, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee, and XY, LLC, Intervening Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed: Mar. 8, 2019. |
Judge's Opinion & Order in Case No. 14-cv-503-wmc. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. Inguran, LLC dib/a Sexing Technologies, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, and XY, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Genus PLC, Counterclaim Defendant. Case: 3:14-cv-00503-wmc. Filed Jul. 21, 2016. |
ABS Global Inc. and Genus PLC's Reply in Support of Their Motion for Claim Construction and Partial Summary Judgment, ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies, Case No. 14-cv-503, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Mar. 7, 2016. |
Jun et al. “Detecting and estimating contamination of human DNA samples in sequencing and array-based genotype data.” The American Journal of Human Genetics 91.5 (2012): 839-848. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US21/56094, dated Mar. 16, 2022, 22 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201480071952.0, dated Mar. 21, 2022, 3 pages. |
Australian Office Action, Application No. 2021200818, dated Mar. 4, 2022, 3 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/864,514, dated Jan. 3, 2022, 24 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,756, dated Jan. 12, 2022, 16 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/458,947, dated Dec. 15, 2021, 9 pages. |
Di Carlo, “Inertial microfluidics.” Lab on a Chip 9.21 (2009): 3038-3046. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/741,608, dated Mar. 18, 2022, 12 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/412,789, dated Mar. 21, 2022, 30 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/458,947, dated Mar. 31, 2022, 30 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/496,469, dated May 10, 2022, 54 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 202147003036, dated Jan. 4, 2022, 5 pages. |
China Patent Office, “The Fifth Office Action,” issued in connection with China Patent Application No. 2014800719520, dated Oct. 20, 2021, 7 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Indian Patent Application No. 202017054203, dated Jan. 7, 2022, 5 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/403,642, dated Mar. 4, 2022, 14 pages. |
Kang, et al. “Effect of an osmotic differential on the efficiency of gene transfer by electroporation of fish spermatozoa.” Aquaculture 173.1-4 (1999): 297-307. (Year: 1999). |
Rieth et al. “Electroporation of bovine spermatozoa to carry DNA containing highly repetitive sequences into oocytes and detection of homologous recombination events.” Molecular Reproduction and Development: Incorporating Gamete Research 57.4 (2000): 338-345. |
Chamberland et al. “The effect of heparin on motility parameters and protein phosphorylation during bovine sperm capacitation. ”Theriogenology 55.3 (2001): 823-835. (Year: 2001). |
Chan, et al. “Luminescent quantum dots for multiplexed biological detection and imaging.” Current opinion in biotechnology 13.1 (2002): 40-46. (Year: 2002). |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/561,146, dated Jan. 21, 2022, 14 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/496,469, dated Jan. 28, 2022, 13 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/692,876, dated Sep. 19, 2022, 21 pages. |
USPTO, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/403,642, dated Sep. 29, 2022, 24 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/741,608, dated Jun. 13, 2022, 11 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/403,642, dated Jul. 13, 2022, 7 pages. |
CNIPA, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 202080028183.1, dated Jul. 6, 2022, 21 pages. |
New Zealand IP Office, “First Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 751869, dated Aug. 12, 2022, 3 pages. |
Canadian Office Action, Application No. 3,034,007, dated Aug. 25, 2022, 3 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/741,608, dated Oct. 19, 2022, 12 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/851,319, dated Nov. 2, 2022, 12 pages. |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/279,430, dated Dec. 6, 2022, 18 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 202080028183.1, dated Jan. 13, 2023, 23 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 22190948.4, dated Jan. 23, 2023, 10 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Intention to Grant Notice,” issued in connection with patent application No. 20167363.9, dated Dec. 15, 2022, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/851,319 dated Feb. 15, 2023, 52 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 20792020.8, dated Dec. 23, 2022, 10 pages. |
Brazilian Office Action, Application No. BR112020023607-1, dated Dec. 12, 2022, 5 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/496,614, dated Dec. 21, 2022, 9 pages. |
Ron Bardell et al. “Microfluidic disposables for cellular and chemical detection: CFD model results and fluidic verification experiments,” Proc. SPIE 4265, Biomedical Instrumentation Based on Micro- and Nanotechnology, May 21, 2001; doi: 10.1117/12.427961 Invited Paper: BiOS 2001 The International Symposium on Biomedical Optics, 2001, San Jose, CA, United States, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/692,876 dated Feb. 1, 2023, 24 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/741,608 dated Feb. 7, 2023, 22 pages. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/164,710, dated Jun. 26, 2023, 13 pages. |
National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) Argentina, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Argentina Patent Application No. 20190101378, dated Apr. 19, 2023, 8 pages. |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Decision of Rejection,” issue in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 202080028183.1, dated Jun. 7, 2023, 23 pages. |
Brazilian Office Action, Application No. BR112021020390-7, dated Oct. 31, 2023, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200329696 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62835676 | Apr 2019 | US |