The present invention relates to the field of denture manufacture and particularly the duplication of existing dentures.
Dentures are worn by a considerable number of individuals. The average life span of a denture is approximately seven years, although many individuals continue to wear dentures well beyond that time period. Additionally, dentures become ill-fitting over time due to changes in the patients anatomy. Dentures may also become damaged over time as well. Also, some individuals may want to have a spare denture in case of the loss of the original denture or in the event of an accidental fracture of their primary denture. The cost and time of creating a new denture can often be considerable. Thus, it is often desirable to make a new denture based on an existing denture, particularly if the patient is satisfied with their existing dentures.
The duplication of an existing denture is preferable in most circumstances as the transfer of the shape of the existing dentures maintain the neuromuscular control to the new dentures. Minor modifications are often necessary as well to compensate for worn teeth and denture bases and for changes in the patients anatomy.
There are a number of techniques currently available for providing a patient with a duplicate denture. Many times a temporary denture will be fabricated by the dentist for the patient while the new denture is being fabricated. However, these temporary dentures are usually ill-fitting, uncomfortable and not intended for continued use. Duplicate dentures are normally fabricated based on the prescription and information from the individual's original dentures, if available. Often, there may be a considerable amount of time that has elapsed and such information may not be available. So rather than create a new denture from scratch, it is often more sensible to duplicate a new denture from existing dentures.
There are a number of techniques currently available for duplicating existing dentures. These techniques involve producing a mold by inserting the existing denture into a rigid container such as a duplicating flask, dental flask or other container filled with an elastic material such as alginate or silicon putty. A wax or auto-polymerizing resin template is then fabricated from the mold. This template is tried in the patient's mouth and modifications are made if necessary. Then the final denture is made and provided to the patient. Other variations include forming a wax rim instead of the auto-polymerizing resin or using a silicon putty to create the denture base. These techniques require several try-ins to ensure the proper fit in the patient and the creation of initial templates or wax rims, then the actual denture. This entails considerable time and expense for the patient.
The present invention provides systems and processes for the precise duplication of dentures from existing dentures. The duplicate dentures can be ready for delivery to the patient in a relatively short time frame. The duplicate denture may even be manufactured in the dentist office.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention provides systems and processes for duplicating a denture from an existing denture. The denture is scanned and the scanned images are used to create a fully digitized denture. A denture base can be fabricated from this model and denture teeth can be designed or selected from a library that is the closest fit to the original denture. The teeth in the digital model are offset a preset distance. The teeth with offset are then subtracted from the digitized denture. The margins of the denture are then cleaned after subtracting the teeth. The denture base is then ready for manufacturing. The teeth are then installed onto the denture base.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the interior and exterior of the dentures can be scanned as discussed above. The dentist can also provide additional information regarding the dentures and the patient as well to ensure a proper fit. This additional information may be used to change the digitized model of the denture.
Another embodiment of the present invention may use the existing dentures to create bite impressions which are scanned along with the existing dentures. These scans are used to create a digital three dimensional image of the denture. This digital model is then used to fabricate a duplicate denture.
The digitized denture model in another preferred embodiment, may also be used to create a denture base. The teeth are subtracted from the model, and teeth are either selected from a library or the teeth may be directly fabricated from the denture information. The denture teeth are temporarily installed in the denture base. This temporary denture is then tried onto the patient. If the fit is not correct, then the denture is used as a secondary impression tray to create a set of bite impressions. These impressions are scanned and used to select or fabricate another denture base. The teeth are installed again and the denture is tried on the patient. This process is repeated until the patient is satisfied. At that point, the teeth are permanently installed, the denture is finally processed and delivered to the patient.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention creates a best fit for the duplicate denture that maintains the occlusal scheme of the existing denture. The occlusal scheme is maintained while allowing changes to the denture for anatomical, functional and aesthetic reasons.
The term anatomical landmarks refers to the structures on the anatomy of the wearer that define the periphery of the denture. Examples of anatomical landmarks include at least one of a vertical height relation to an upper and lower bite alignment, a lip support, a smile line, a centric relationship and a midline measurement.
These and other features of the claimed inventions will be evident from the ensuing detailed description of preferred embodiments, from the drawings and from the claims.
The present invention provides systems and process for the duplication of dentures. Descriptive embodiments are provided before for explanatory purposes. It is to be expressly understood that the present invention is not be limited to these descriptive embodiments. Other embodiments are considered to be within the scope of the present invention, including without limitation the use of the present invention for other applications, such as denture duplication, dental implants, and other dental and orthodontic applications. The descriptions below discuss the systems of the present invention as used in dental labs, but it is to be expressly understood that these systems could also be implemented in the dentist office or through a network allowing interaction between the dentist and the dental lab through the systems. The processes and systems of the present invention may also be used in combination with all or parts of the following applications, entitled System and Processes for Optimization for Dentures, Ser. No. 12/939,141; System and Process for Forming Anatomical Features in Dentures, Ser. No. 12/939,138; and Removable Handle for Use with Dentures, Ser. No. 12/939,143 all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The terms denture base generally refers to the part of a denture that fits the oral mucosa of the basal seat, restores the normal contours of the soft tissues of the edentulous or partly edentures mouth, and supports the artificial teeth. The term denture refers to the denture base with the artificial teeth attached.
Overview
A preferred embodiment of the present invention provides systems and processes for duplicating a denture from an existing denture. The denture is scanned and a best fit procedure is used to create a fully digitized denture. An offset is added to the overall dimension of the denture teeth. The denture teeth with the offset are then subtracted from the digitized denture model. The margins of the denture are then cleaned after subtracting the teeth. The denture base is then ready for manufacturing. The teeth are then installed onto the denture base.
Process
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is disclosed that allows new dentures to be created from an existing denture. The patient provides their existing dentures to the dentist for scanning. Digital scans 30, 32 are created from the inside and outside of the original denture 20 as shown in
This digitized denture model 40 is then digitally compared with denture teeth from a library to select the best fitting denture teeth 50 in the scanned model as shown in
The denture teeth may be either selected from a library or fabricated from the digital model in a number of process. In this preferred embodiment, the denture base is machined in acrylic based on the digital model 60. This can be done relatively quickly. Once the denture base 70 has been fabricated as shown in
This entire process can be done in a relatively fast time frame. In some instance, the duplication process can take place in the dentist offices. In other instances, the scanned images of the existing denture can be transmitted to a nearby dental lab where the denture is fabricated and courier to the dentist.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the interior and exterior of the dentures can be scanned as discussed above. The dentist can also provide additional information regarding the dentures and the patient as well. For example, the dentist may notice that the dentures are no longer properly fitting due to wear of the denture base or the teeth or due to changes in the patient's anatomy. This additional information may be used to change the digitized model of the denture.
In yet another alternative embodiment of the present invention, the dentist may provide additional information beyond the scanned images of the interior and exterior of the dentures. The dentist may use those existing dentures as an impression tray to take bite impressions of the patient. Those bite impressions are then scanned and used along with the scanned images of the interior and exterior of the dentures to create the digitized denture.
The occlusal scheme of the existing denture is maintained in the duplicate denture. The duplicate denture can be modified to accommodate anatomical, aesthetic and functional changes that might be necessary.
The digitized denture model 40, in another preferred embodiment, may also be used to create a model for a denture base. The teeth are subtracted from the model, and a denture base is directly fabricated from the denture base information. A denture base is then fabricated, the margins are cleaned and teeth are temporarily installed. This try-in denture is then tried onto the patient. If the fit is not correct, then the denture is used as a secondary impression tray to create a set of bite impressions. These impressions are scanned and used to select or fabricate another denture base. The teeth are installed again and the denture is tried on the patient. This process is repeated until the patient is satisfied. At that point, the teeth are permanently installed, the denture is finally processed and installed to the patient.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention may be implemented in a number of ways.
The above descriptions are intended for explanatory purposes and are not meant to the limit the scope of the claimed inventions. Other embodiments may be covered under the claims as well.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/059239 | 11/3/2011 | WO | 00 | 3/14/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/061659 | 5/10/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200445 | Fahnestock | Feb 1878 | A |
321847 | Peirce et al. | Jul 1885 | A |
711324 | Lacy | Oct 1902 | A |
1223450 | Van Allen | Apr 1917 | A |
1293627 | Bowers | Feb 1919 | A |
1585348 | Hick et al. | May 1926 | A |
1652910 | Psayla | Dec 1927 | A |
1714185 | Hugh | May 1929 | A |
1863591 | Crowell | Jun 1932 | A |
1914606 | Kinna et al. | Jun 1933 | A |
2107181 | Guyton | Feb 1938 | A |
2418833 | Harris et al. | Apr 1947 | A |
2472492 | Saffir | Jun 1949 | A |
2641835 | Greenmun | Jun 1953 | A |
2985961 | Schwartz | May 1961 | A |
2994957 | Mcleod | Aug 1961 | A |
3083459 | McMurry et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3241238 | Kertsten | Mar 1966 | A |
3644996 | Weinkle | Feb 1972 | A |
3667123 | Huey | Jun 1972 | A |
3727309 | Huey | Apr 1973 | A |
3748739 | Thibert | Jul 1973 | A |
3813777 | Van Handel et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3844702 | Dimmer et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4029632 | Gross et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4227877 | Tureaud et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4247287 | Gigante | Jan 1981 | A |
4299573 | Ricci | Nov 1981 | A |
4533325 | Blair | Aug 1985 | A |
4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
4634377 | Behrend | Jan 1987 | A |
4784608 | Mays | Nov 1988 | A |
4931016 | Sillard | Jun 1990 | A |
5098296 | Cullen | Mar 1992 | A |
5151044 | Rotsaert | Sep 1992 | A |
5188529 | Luth | Feb 1993 | A |
5427906 | Hansen | Jun 1995 | A |
5672305 | Kogure | Sep 1997 | A |
5711668 | Huestis | Jan 1998 | A |
5716214 | Lund | Feb 1998 | A |
5718584 | Wong | Feb 1998 | A |
5833461 | Wong | Nov 1998 | A |
5839900 | Billet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6056547 | Names | May 2000 | A |
6139322 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6149427 | Van Handel | Nov 2000 | A |
6224372 | Ibsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227851 | Chishti | May 2001 | B1 |
6384107 | Liu | May 2002 | B2 |
6422864 | Glatt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488503 | Lichkus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6616444 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6851949 | Sachdeva | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7021934 | Aravena | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7153135 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7234940 | Weissman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7433810 | Pavloskaia et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474932 | Geng | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7758345 | Christensen | Jul 2010 | B1 |
8043091 | Schmitt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8348669 | Schmitt | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8567408 | Roettger | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8641938 | Howe | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8801431 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875398 | Balshi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9055993 | Grobbee et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020015934 | Rubbert et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020180760 | Rubbert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108845 | Giovannone | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030162147 | Dequeker | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163291 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211444 | Andrews | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040005530 | Mullaly | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029068 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040219490 | Gartner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050175957 | Haje | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186539 | McLean et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050284489 | Ambis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040232 | Shoup | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040236 | Schmitt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060063135 | Mehl | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060210945 | Savic et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060286507 | Dequeker | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070154868 | Scharlack et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070231774 | Massad | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080085489 | Schmitt | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090207 | Rubbert | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080127698 | Luckey et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080206710 | Kruth et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206714 | Schmitt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209974 | Ewolski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300716 | Kopelman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090148813 | Sun et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162813 | Glor | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090287332 | Adusumilli et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291407 | Kuo | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090325125 | Diangelo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100015572 | Dierkes et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100062394 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086186 | Zug et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094446 | Baloch et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105011 | Karkar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100324875 | Kalili | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045442 | Adusimilli | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112804 | Chishti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129796 | Riggio | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110236856 | Kanazawa et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244417 | Hilsen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120058449 | Sklarski et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095732 | Fisker et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100500 | Gao | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120178045 | Massad | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179281 | Steingart et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120258426 | Boe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285019 | Schechner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329008 | Fishman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130108988 | Simoncic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130216978 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218532 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221554 | Jung et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249132 | Thompson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130280672 | Thompson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130316302 | Fisker | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140045967 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140272796 | Grobbee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010885 | Balshi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150037760 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150064653 | Grobbee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150134094 | Thompson et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150230891 | Grobbee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245891 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150245892 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2505892 | May 2004 | CA |
2008307281 | Dec 2008 | JP |
WO-0132096 | May 2001 | WO |
2009105661 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009105700 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010022479 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010058822 | May 2010 | WO |
2012041329 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012061652 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061655 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061659 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061660 | May 2012 | WO |
2014130536 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015031062 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO; Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059230. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059230. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059235. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059235. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 9, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059239. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059239. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059240. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059240. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,2100. |
EPO; European Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2014 in Application No. 11838839.6. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 25, 2014 in Application No. PCT/US2014/017136. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated dated Nov. 7, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 5, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
USPTO; Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 7, 2014 in Application No. PCT/US2014/023654. |
USPTO; Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,136. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 12, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,238. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Feb. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 2, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
EPO; European Search Report and Opinion dated Mar. 3, 2014 in Application No. 11838843.8. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,136. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,238. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 24, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,662. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 22, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130209962 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |