The present invention relates to the field of manufacturing dentures. More particularly, the present invention relates to manufacturing of dentures having multiple material layers.
Dentures have been manufactured for centuries to replace all or part of an individual's dentition. Dentures have been manufactured by molding the denture from casts made of the patient's edentulous or partially edentulous ridges. The manufacturing process may begin with a preliminary impression of the patient's mouth, which is usually done in silicone or alginate. This impression may be used to prepare a diagnostic cast. While making the impression, the dentist applies pressure to the soft tissues to simulate biting force and extends the borders of the mold to adjacent toothless areas to allow the dentures to better adapt to the gums. A final cast may then be formed from gypsum based on the diagnostic cast. The final cast may be filled or “waxed up” to form the denture. The denture teeth will be set in the wax. The cast with the waxed denture will be placed in a mold and injected or packed with acrylic. Once the resin has cured, the cast may be broken apart and the denture may be removed.
More recently, dentures have been manufactured by machining a void in a block of denture base material formed to match the contour of natural teeth as arranged on a maxilla or on a mandible; filling the void with a synthetic tooth material; removing a portion of the synthetic tooth material; and potentially filling the void and removing a portion of material a second time in order to create denture having teeth made of one or potentially two or more layers.
While machining has been used to form the basic shapes of dentures and denture teeth, prior innovations fail to adequately address the aesthetics and function of the denture, particularly the aesthetics at and below the gum line. For example, in a traditional denture the denture teeth mimic the appearance of a natural tooth only above the gum line because traditional denture teeth adhere to a denture baseplate rather than extending into the baseplate with roots, as would real teeth. Traditional denture teeth are made in standard shapes using injection molding or pressure molding techniques. Anatomical roots are not incorporated in these teeth because of manufacturing difficulties. Currently, a dental technician may festoon root structures in the denture base and use different coloring techniques to paint the dental base to simulate the roots. This requires additional cost, delay, and expense and does not aesthetically mimic a natural tooth as completely as an anatomical root would. Thus there is a need for a denture having a more natural structure that will exhibit an improved aesthetic appearance.
Prior innovations also fail to adequately address the function of traditional dentures with traditional denture teeth. Dentures need to be balanced to avoid the patient's denture becoming loose or unstable during the protrusive and lateral movement of the mandible. This often requires grinding the occlusal surface of the denture teeth until the dentures remain in contact on at least three points throughout much of the movement of the mandible. Traditionally, a denture technician will set up the denture in an articulator and grind the teeth until the occlusive design of the denture is balanced. However, grinding the teeth will take away the enamel layer of the teeth, diminishing the aesthetic appearance of the teeth and functionally weakening the teeth. Thus there is a also need for a denture which is balanced, yet with unground occlusal surface (enamel) so that the denture has a more natural structure that will exhibit an improved aesthetic appearance and will not suffer from weakening of the enamel due to grinding.
Furthermore, in many dentures, a metal bar often sits beneath the denture base to enhance stability and strength. Often if the denture is implant supported, the denture is installed without the bar structure until such time as the patient has healed from the surgery enough so that the inflammation or swelling of the patient's soft tissue has receded to allow the bar structure to fit beneath the denture base. Then a modified denture must be reinstalled, with the bar structure. Furthermore, denture acrylics are often not strong enough to sustain bite forces, thus the base is often mounted on a bar to distribute the forces. This bar can be undesirable due to the associated bulk, cost, weight, and production delay and expense. Thus there is yet another need for a denture having a reinforcement structure but without the bulk, cost, weight, production delay and expense associated with the bar structure.
Accordingly, there remains a need for a denture that more closely simulates natural mouth structures, providing both structural and aesthetical improvements and which, in the case of implant-supported dentures, does not require a follow up procedure to insert a separate bar beneath the denture.
In accordance with various aspects of the present invention, an improved layered denture is provided. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a layered denture comprises a base comprising a first material having a first pocket and a second pocket; an artificial dentition structure in said first pocket wherein said first pocket is configured to support said artificial dentition structure; a reinforcement material wherein said reinforcement material may be filled into a second pocket and machined to provide a support layer; and a second material wherein said second material may be filled into said second pocket and machined to form a covering layer.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a layered denture may be manufactured by iteratively adding layers to cavities or pockets in the denture base and then removing portions of the layers to create portions of the teeth, roots of teeth, reinforcement structures, or other features of the denture. Different layers can be formed from different materials having different strengths, colors, translucency and other material properties. Furthermore, a layered denture may be manufactured according to electronic models, such as three-dimensional digital images, wherein the design of the dentition is adjusted to achieve balanced occlusion.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, the material removing operations can be performed in accordance with three-dimensional digital images to create realistic dentures. The three-dimensional digital images can be created from the patient using combinations of digital scanning and bite impressions.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, a layered denture may be configured to approximate roots of teeth. The base may have pockets configured to simulate roots when filled with a material. For example a material may be filled in a pocket resulting in a root approximating structure so that the denture has a more realistic appearance.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the Figures, where like reference numbers refer to similar elements throughout the Figures, and:
The following description is of various exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present disclosure in any way. Rather, the following description is intended to provide a convenient illustration for implementing various embodiments including the best mode. As will become apparent, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements described in these embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques for manufacturing and construction may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in various figures contained herein are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical method of construction.
Now, with reference to
In one example embodiment, said base 210 comprises a hardened polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) material. However, said base may comprise any material having sufficiently low porosity so as to be hygienic for extended placement in a wearer's mouth. For example, said base may be made of a plastic, ceramic, metal, or acrylic, including for instance, a polymer, monomer, composite, or alloy.
Furthermore, said base and any other components of a layered denture 200 may be formed according to a process and system for molding or forming products from thermosetting plastics. Such a system may utilize a deformable container that is placed within the cavity of a housing of a mold with resins and initiator mixed therein. As a piston slides into the cavity, the upper edges of the container may engage between the housing and the piston to seal the housing from leakage. The pressure of the piston along with heat on the housing may enable the curing process to be controlled to maximize compression and minimize porosity. Exemplary processes and systems disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,238, PROCESSES AND SYSTEMS FOR MOLDING THERMOSETTING PLASTICS are incorporated by reference.
Furthermore, said base 210 comprising a first material may have a first pocket and a second pocket. Said first pocket and said second pocket may be machined by a CAD/CAM machining device, although any process suited for accurate forming of the material maybe utilized. For example, said first pocket and said second pocket may be formed by machining, etching, waterjet, laser cutting, 3D printing, or chemical mask processes.
In one example embodiment, a layered denture 200 may have an artificial dentition structure 220. In one example embodiment, this structure may be at least one tooth. Said tooth may be constructed according to the principles described herein wherein a first tooth dentition material is filled into the first pocket of base 210 and machined to form a dentin layer 260 and a second tooth dentition material is filled into said first pocket of base 210 and machined to provide an enamel layer 250. The dentin layer 260 may comprise acrylic though any suitable material may be used. The enamel layer 250 may comprise high impact acrylic though any material adapted to be wear and abrasion resistant may be used. In some example embodiments, the dentin layer 260 and/or the enamel layer 250 comprise materials processed by exemplary processes and systems disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,238, PROCESSES AND SYSTEMS FOR MOLDING THERMOSETTING PLASTICS, which are incorporated by reference. In some example embodiments these exemplary processes and system enhance the durability of the acrylic or other materials comprising the dentin layer 260 and/or enamel layer 250. In some example embodiments, said artificial dentition structure 220 is electronically defined to achieve balanced occlusion, in accordance with the principles disclosed herein. For example, at least one layer of said artificial dentition structure may be offset to accommodate an enamel layer.
Now, with reference to
As discussed in the background, a metal reinforcement bar may be used to provide reinforcement support to a denture; however, in accordance with the principles disclosed herein, a layered denture 200 may instead comprise a support layer 230 to provide reinforcement support to a layered denture. Said support layer 230 may comprise carbon fiber, though it may alternatively comprise numerous other materials configured to provide support, such as, for example, a Kevlar-brand material, Dynema-brand material, Aramid-brand material, alloy, glass, binder, epoxy, polyester, acrylic, or any material or combination of materials having a desired strength, stiffness, or flexibility sufficient to reinforce said denture. In still other embodiments, layered denture 200 may comprise a plurality of support layers.
In some embodiments, support layer 230 may lie generally parallel to the mandibular or maxillary plane. In other embodiments, support layer 230 may lie generally normal to the mandibular or maxillary ridge, or at any angle with respect to the mandibular ridge or the maxillary ridge. Furthermore, support layer 230 may be non-continuous along the denture. Some embodiments may combine features of various exemplary embodiments.
In some embodiments, a support layer 230 may comprise multiple materials, or any material configuration suitable to enhance or reinforce the resiliency and/or support of the layered denture when subjected to wear in a wearer's mouth or to satisfy other desired chemical, physical, or biological properties. Furthermore, a support layer may comprise materials with differing grain structures or grain direction or with similar grain structures or grain direction or any grain structure or direction suitable for achieving desired properties in the layered denture 200; for example, resiliency under torsional loads. In some embodiments, a support layer 230 may be comprised of carbon, a Kevlar-brand material, Dynema-brand material, Aramid-brand material, alloy, glass, binder, epoxy, polyester, acrylic, or any material or combination of materials suitable for achieving desired properties in the layered denture 200.
A support layer 230 may also be made of materials with differing or similar visual and aesthetic features, such as color, translucency, or gloss, or any visual or aesthetic feature to simulate natural dentition of the patient.
In some example embodiments, the materials comprising a support layer may be self cured, heat-cured, radiation-cured, or illumination-cured, or otherwise rendered solid by any other method. In some example embodiments, the materials comprising a support layer may be cured in accordance with exemplary processes and systems disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,238, PROCESSES AND SYSTEMS FOR MOLDING THERMOSETTING PLASTICS are incorporated by reference.
Now, with reference to
In one example embodiment, said machining is in accordance with a three-dimensional file of the patient's anatomy. For example, in one example embodiment, a layered denture 200 may be manufactured with consideration for balanced occlusion of the layered denture when used by a denture user. In one embodiment, artificial dentition structure 220 is electronically defined by computer modeling wherein each layer is designed by defining the motion envelope of the user's mandible and each layer is shaped to accommodate that motion while remaining in contact through much or all of the motion. In one example embodiment, each layer may be defined by prismatic or other geometry. Furthermore, with reference to
With reference to
An exemplary manufacturing process may proceed by iterative steps of machining pockets, then filling the machined pockets with a material, then machining the filled material to create a layer. In other exemplary manufacturing processes, multiple steps of machining and filling may occur in parallel, for example, at different locations or surfaces of the layered denture. In some example embodiments, at least one of dentin portion 260 and enamel layer 250 may be formed by machining or by 3D printing. In some example embodiments, additional material, for example, bonding material, is filled over a layer and machined, although any manufacturing process causing adhesion or bonding between layers may be utilized. In some embodiments, a layered denture may comprise multiple layers, although any number of layers suitable to form the denture as desired may be implemented.
The process for manufacturing layered dentures may be implemented by an apparatus as describing below. Moreover, it is to be expressly understood that any other systems or apparatus may also implement the process of the present invention.
In one instance, a fixture for holding the layered denture during manufacturing may be located adjacent to a material removing device. In some instances, the material removing device is a CNC or a CAD/CAM mill, although the material removing device can be a mill, grinder, laser cutter, or any other suitable device for forming the structures of the layered denture. In some instances, the material removing device and the fixture are movable relative to one another. In some instances, adjacent to the fixture may be at least one material delivery device to deliver raw material for the filling process described herein. Now, having discussed manufacturing of the reinforcement aspects, a layered denture may be further improved by adding a simulated root structure.
With reference to
In some example embodiments, said simulated root material 710 provides a surface upon which artificial dentition structure 220 may be mounted. In other example embodiments, said simulated root material is machined to form part of a dentin portion 260 of an artificial dentition structure 220. For example, in some example embodiments (
In some example embodiments (
With reference to
With reference to
Furthermore, with reference to
In addition, it should be noted that exemplary embodiments of a layered denture may include one of a simulated root structure, a support layer and a consideration for balanced occlusion, or any combination of such features. For example, a layered denture may include a support layer with balance occlusion (and without simulated root structure), a support layer with a simulated root structure (without balanced occlusion), a simulated root structure with balanced occlusion (without a support layer, and/or with a convention metal band configuration) or any other arrangement of such features individually or in combination. For purposes of describing the present invention, machining is used to describe the process of removing material from a part. This term, for purposes of the present invention includes but is not limited to milling, 3D printing, grinding, water jetting, laser cutting, electric discharge machining, CNC machining, ultrasonic machining, and any other type of mechanical, chemical, electrical, or other process suitable to conform filled material into to a layer.
The present disclosure has been described with reference to various embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Likewise, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to various embodiments. However, benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Also, as used herein, the terms “proximate,” “proximately,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a physical connection, an electrical connection, a magnetic connection, an optical connection, a communicative connection, a functional connection, and/or any other connection. When language similar to “at least one of A, B, or C” is used, the phrase is intended to mean any of the following: (1) at least one of A; (2) at least one of B; (3) at least one of C; (4) at least one of A and at least one of B; (5) at least one of B and at least one of C; (6) at least one of A and at least one of C; or (7) at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200445 | Fahnestock et al. | Feb 1878 | A |
321847 | Peirce et al. | Jul 1885 | A |
711324 | Lacy | Oct 1902 | A |
1223450 | Van Allen | Apr 1917 | A |
1293627 | Bowers | Feb 1919 | A |
1585348 | Hick et al. | May 1926 | A |
1652910 | Psayla | Dec 1927 | A |
1714185 | Morgan | May 1929 | A |
1863591 | Crowell | Jun 1932 | A |
1914606 | Kinna et al. | Jun 1933 | A |
2107181 | Guyton | Feb 1938 | A |
2418833 | Harris | Apr 1947 | A |
2472492 | Saffir | Jun 1949 | A |
2641835 | Greenmun | Jun 1953 | A |
2985961 | Schwartz | May 1961 | A |
2994957 | Mcleod | Aug 1961 | A |
3083459 | McMurry et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3241238 | Kertsten | Mar 1966 | A |
3644996 | Weinkle | Feb 1972 | A |
3667123 | Huey | Jun 1972 | A |
3727309 | Huey | Apr 1973 | A |
3748739 | Thibert | Jul 1973 | A |
3813777 | Van Handel et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3844702 | Dimmer et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4029632 | Gross et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4227877 | Tureaud et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4247287 | Gigante | Jan 1981 | A |
4299573 | Ricci | Nov 1981 | A |
4533325 | Blair et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
4634377 | Behrend | Jan 1987 | A |
4784608 | Mays | Nov 1988 | A |
4931016 | Sillard | Jun 1990 | A |
5098296 | Cullen | Mar 1992 | A |
5151044 | Rotsaert | Sep 1992 | A |
5188529 | Luth | Feb 1993 | A |
5340309 | Robertson | Aug 1994 | A |
5427906 | Hansen | Jun 1995 | A |
5672305 | Kogure | Jul 1997 | A |
5711668 | Huestis | Jan 1998 | A |
5716214 | Lund | Feb 1998 | A |
5718584 | Wong | Feb 1998 | A |
5833461 | Wong | Nov 1998 | A |
5839900 | Billet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6056547 | Names | May 2000 | A |
6139322 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6149427 | Van Handel | Nov 2000 | A |
6224372 | Ibsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227851 | Chishti et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6384107 | Liu | May 2002 | B2 |
6422864 | Glatt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488503 | Lichkus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6616444 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6851949 | Sachdeva | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7021934 | Aravena | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7153135 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7234940 | Weissman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7433810 | Pavloskaia et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474932 | Geng | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7758345 | Christensen | Jul 2010 | B1 |
8043091 | Schmitt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8348669 | Schmitt | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8567408 | Roettger et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8641938 | Howe | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8801431 | Thompson | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9055993 | Grobbee et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020015934 | Rubbert et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020180760 | Rubbert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108845 | Giovannone | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030162147 | Dequeker | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163291 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211444 | Andrews | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040005530 | Mullaly | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029068 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040219490 | Gartner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050175957 | Haje | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186539 | McLean et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050284489 | Ambis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040232 | Shoup | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040236 | Schmitt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060063135 | Mehl | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060210945 | Savic et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060286507 | Dequeker | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070154868 | Scharlack et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070231774 | Massad | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080085489 | Schmitt | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090207 | Rubbert | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080127698 | Luckey et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080206710 | Kruth et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206714 | Schmitt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209974 | Ewolski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300716 | Kopelman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090148813 | Sun et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162813 | Glor | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090287332 | Adusumilli et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291407 | Kuo | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090325125 | Diangelo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100015572 | Dierkes et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100062394 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086186 | Zug et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094446 | Baloch et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105011 | Karkar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100324875 | Kalili | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045442 | Adusumilli | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112804 | Chishti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129796 | Riggio | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110236856 | Kanazawa | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244417 | Hilsen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120058449 | Sklarski et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095732 | Fisker et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100500 | Gao | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120178045 | Massad | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179281 | Steingart et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120258426 | Boe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285019 | Schechner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329008 | Fishman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130108988 | Simoncic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130209962 | Thompson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216978 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218532 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221554 | Jung et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249132 | Thompson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130280672 | Thompson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130316302 | Fisker | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140045967 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140242539 | Fisker | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140272796 | Grobbee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150037760 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150064653 | Grobbee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150134094 | Thompson et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150230891 | Grobbee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245891 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150245892 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2505892 | May 2004 | CA |
2008307281 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2001032096 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2009105661 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009105700 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010022479 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2012041329 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012061652 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061655 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061659 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061660 | May 2012 | WO |
2014130536 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015031062 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059230. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059230. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059235. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059235. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 9, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059239. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059239. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059240. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059240. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,466. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 2, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
EPO; European Search Report and Opinion dated Mar. 3, 2014 in Application No. 11838843.8. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 25, 2014 in Application No. PCT/US2014/017136. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 5, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 7, 2014 in Application No. PCT/US2014/023654. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/768,742, filed Aug. 18, 2013, Removable System and Method for Dentures and Surgical Guides. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138, filed Nov. 3, 2010, Systems and Process for Forming Anatomical Features in Dentures. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/798,717, filed Jul. 14, 2015, Systems and Process for Forming Anatomical Features in Dentures. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,141, filed Nov. 3, 2010, System and Process for Optimization of Dentures. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,238, filed Feb. 8, 2012, Process and Syystems for Molding Thermosetting Plastics. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295, filed Aug. 29, 2013, Improved Denture Reference and Registration System, now U.S. Appl. No. 9,055,993, Jun. 16, 2015, Grobbee et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963, filed Apr. 28, 2015, Denture Reference and Registration System. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,097, filed Aug. 7, 2015, System and Method for Manufacturing Layered Dentures. |
USPTO; Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,466, filed Mar. 14, 2013, System and Process for Duplication of Dentures. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Systems and Process for Forming Anatomical Features in Dentures. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,662, filed Mar. 14, 2013, System and Process for Optimization of Dentures. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210, filed Sep. 29, 2011, Combination Tool for Anatomical Measurement for Denture Manufacture. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,238, filed Feb. 8, 2012, Process and Systems for Molding Thermosetting Plastics. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295, filed Aug. 29, 2013, Improved Denture Reference and Registration System. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348, filed Mar. 3, 2014, System and Method for Manufacturing Layered Dentures. |
USPTO; Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,136, filed Nov. 3, 2010, System and Process for Duplication of Dentures. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210, filed Sep. 29, 2011, Combination Tool for Anatomical Measurement for Denture Manufacture, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,431, Aug. 12, 2014, Thompson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,338, filed Oct. 3, 2014, System and Method for Manufacturing Layered Dentures. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,466. |
EPO; European Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2014 in Application No. 11838839.6. |
USPTO; Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,136. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 12, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,238. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,466. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,136. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,238. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 24, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,662. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140272796 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |