The invention relates to digital data processing and, more particularly, to software development systems and methods. The invention has application, by way of non-limiting example, to accelerating the creation and modification of software applications that comprise one or more workflows.
The traditional way for creating a software application has required many skilled workers such as a database administrator, UI designer, programmers as well as the process architects and business users that understand the workflow. Months of work are usually required to develop, test, and deploy even the simplest of workflow automation applications.
Recently, model-driven development (MDD) tools have incrementally improved this process, allowing users to describe each step of a workflow explicitly in a diagramming tool such as Microsoft Visio or equivalent software program, and much of the coding and user interface development is automated. The MDD tools have sped development up incrementally, in some cases up to 70 percent faster than the aforementioned traditional method. Yet much of the development of a software application is redundant because an application's structure is constrained by the data the workflow is designed to capture and display.
In view of the foregoing, an object of the invention is to provide improved methods and system for digital data processing.
A related object is to provide such methods and apparatus as can be used to build new software applications as well as modify existing software applications.
A further related object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus as can be used by both skilled and unskilled users to rapidly build and modify software applications without even seeing a line of code.
Yet a still further object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus as can be implemented and operated at reduced expense on existing and new platforms.
The foregoing are among the objects attained by the invention which provides, in some aspects, a system comprising an App Generator (application generator). The App Generator further comprises executable program instructions that define one or more constraints, wherein said one or more constraints embody one or more rules for converting an information structure into one or more components of a software application. The system includes a digital data processor executing said executable program instructions to: i. provide a user interface; ii. accept input data that defines the information structure; iii. apply the one or more constraints to said input data to generate the one or more components of the software application. The one or more components for the software application may include any of one or more workflows, one or more user interfaces and one or more database tables and columns. The information structure may be a hierarchical data structure.
Such a system can include one or more elements of the systems described above.
In other aspects, the invention provides methods that parallel operation of the systems described above and can be used to create and/or modify software applications.
These and other aspects of the invention are evident in the drawings and in the description that follows.
A more complete understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which:
An insight of this invention is that by analyzing the structure of the information the application is intended to capture and process, a functional workflow can be effectively generated to capture that information, including all necessary user interface and database components.
Furthermore, the interface for capturing the information structure from the unskilled user who wants to build a software application also requires its own development process. Workflow automation and MDD companies go through the traditional software method described previously to update and maintain their software development environment.
The invention described herein allows for the rapid evolution of the information structure design workflow because it is itself generated from an information structure, which will be called the “meta-information structure” heretofore.
Automating the continued development of the data structure workflow can provide a significant advantage to a software company that employs the techniques described herein to its platform, allowing for the quick addition of new features.
The illustrated digital data processors 12a, 12b and 16 comprise personal computers, blade PCs, work stations, mainframes, personal digital assistants (PDAs), mobile phones, embedded processors and/or other digital data apparatus of the type known in the art, one or more of which can be adapted for operation in accord with the teachings hereof. Here, those digital data processors are of the type and configuration used in a thin client computing environment, i.e., with an application server (e.g., 16) providing a majority of the processing and other functionality to one or more client devices (e.g., 12a,12b) via network(s) 14; however, the invention may be practiced in any variety of other computing environments, networked or otherwise. By way of non-limiting example, the software development system 10 may be based on thick client principles where all of the functionality and resources utilizing the techniques described herein are provided and/or utilized by a single digital data processor (e.g., SD server 16) that is networked or otherwise. Examples of other well known computing environments include, but are not limited to, rich client environments where a networked digital data processor (e.g., 12a, 12b and 16) has some components and software installed locally but also uses resources and/or functionality distributed over a network. Still further examples of computing environments in which the invention may be practiced include cloud computing and other distributed and virtual computing environments.
The techniques set forth herein may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as a computer program product or program modules (collectively, “computer programs”), accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a digital data processor (e.g., 12a, 12b, 16) or any instruction execution mechanism. Generally, computer programs include routines, objects, components, data structures, and the like, that are designed to perform particular tasks. Typically the functionality of the computer programs may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium may include any apparatus that can store, communicate, propagate, or transport the computer program for use by or in connection with a digital data processor or instruction execution system.
The medium may be, but is not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, or electromagnetic. Examples of computer-readable mediums include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), EEPROM, flash memory, a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include CD-ROM, CD-R/W and DVD.
As illustrated in
The digital data processors 12a, 12b and 16 may be coupled to each other or external storage devices (e.g., system database 18) through intervening networks (e.g., 14) through the use of network adapters (not shown in
Described in more detail in following paragraphs and figures is processing that may be performed by computer programs executed by the computers 12a, 12b and SD server 16 in connection with using the techniques described herein. In the illustrated embodiment, digital data processors 12a, 12b are client computers which communicate with the SD server 16 over the network 14. The computers 12a, 12b may include a web browser or other software for use in connection with rendering a user interface (UI) that may be used in connection with viewing and performing other operations on data requested, and received from, the SD server 16. The web browser and UI may also be used to transmit data to SD server 16 for processing by the SD server 16. Each of the clients 12a, 12b may operate independently of each other in connection with performing different operations on data obtained from the server 16. The SD server 16 and client computers 12a, 12b may utilize the techniques described herein to create and/or modify software applications that comprise one or more workflows. In addition to the internal memory and storage of digital data processors 12a, 12b and 16, the software development system 10 may also utilize an external database system 18 to store and access data that is generated and/or processed by the digital data processors. Examples of external database systems that may be used include, but are not limited to, Microsoft Access, Microsoft SQL server, IBM DB2, Informix, Oracle and Sybase.
Once the meta-information structure is finalized, a user may signal (e.g., using the thin client interface of client 12a) SD server 16 to process the meta-information structure in step 120 to create an application generator (hereinafter, “App. Generator”) component (shown as element 40 in
Regardless of the specific technology employed by SD server 16 to process the meta-information structure in response to signaling by client 12a, the end result of such processing in step 120 is an executable computer program, the App Generator (shown as element 40 in
The App Generator may be implemented in a single computer program or a combination of multiple software modules. Though, in the illustrated embodiment in
In the illustrated embodiment, the information structure 200 is created and stored as an XML file at a location that is accessible from the SD server 16 (e.g., system database 18 or locally on SD server 16). In order to begin creating the XML file using the App Generator 40, a user may signal the SD server 16 (e.g., by way of HTTP/HTTPS requests) using a thin client interface (e.g., web browser) to execute the App Generator 40. Upon receiving the execution signal from client 12a, the SD server 16 executes the computer executable instructions of the computer program that implements the App. Generator 40. As a result of this execution, a user interface (e.g., see element 500 in
Once the information structure for the software application is defined and provided to the App. Generator 40 in step 140, the App. Generator parses the XML file to automatically generate the corresponding software application by constructing a model of a process in step 150. In the illustrated embodiment, the App. Generator 40 stores the process model as a Java object consisting of an array of steps (e.g., 211-215). A series of one or more steps may comprise a single workflow and the software application may include one or more workflows. Each step of a workflow comprises one or more data fields and process actions. A data field may be an attribute that is either input by the software application's end user through a user interface (e.g., input field on a web page) or its value may be set by a function/expression. A process action may be specification of a trigger event for process state transitions (e.g., moving from one state to another). Such events may include modifications to the values of data fields captured at each step (e.g., creating, reviewing, updating and deleting values of data instances), user actions with respect to the user interface displaying a particular step in a workflow (e.g., making a selection, clicking a button, tabbing in/out of fields etc.). Such process actions may be used by the App. Generator 40 to configure certain elements of the user interface for workflow steps (e.g., buttons 604 and 605 of screen 600 as shown in
As an example of how the App. Generator may parse the information structure to generate a process model of a software application, consider the following pseudo-code (A), in which tags with a type attribute set to “complex” generate workflow steps and each tag with a type attribute set to “simple” generates a data field to be captured as part of the parent step. Further, “simple” tags are always embedded within “complex” tags.
Such rules about the hierarchical layout of the “simple” and “complex” tags in an information structure for an application, and how such tags are converted into steps and data fields for the software application, are embodied in constraints that are specified in the meta-information structure. The App Generator 40 applies such rules when parsing information structures to generate software applications.
By way of non-limiting example, for pseudo-code (A) above, the process used by the App. Generator 40 to parse the XML begins at the highest level 0 (e.g., element 201) of the information structure, i.e., the ExpenseReport tag. Because the ExpenseReport tag is at the highest level and of type “complex”, the App. Generator 40 creates a process object (i.e. workflow), the first step of which captures the data fields related to the ExpenseReport step. The App. Generator 40 then traverses the children of ExpenseReport with a type attribute set to “simple,” Name, CreatedDate and CreatedBy. The App. Generator 40 converts these tags into data fields of the ExpenseReport step. Next, the App. Generator 40 traverses to the next complex data structure Expense at the next level (e.g., 202, 203) and generates the second step of the process. Applying the same constraints as those mentioned above, the App. Generator 40 traverses the “simple” tags embedded within the parent Expense tag i.e., Amount and Description. Again, applying the rules embodied in the constraints that are applied during this XML parsing, the App. Generator 40 converts these “simple” tags into data fields of the Expense step in the workflow. Additionally, the App. Generator 40 processes the Party tag, which is a child of the Expense tag at the same Level as elements 204, 205 in
In addition to creating the process model of the software application, in step 150 (and sub-step 220 as shown in
Again using the database structure for the ExpenseReport3 workflow as an example and assuming that a single instance of the ExpenseReport object has been created with a single instance of Expense and Party objects created within the ExpenseReport object. The additional column in database table for ExpenseReport instance will store the values for all 3 instances i.e. ExpenseReport, Expense and Party. The additional column in database table for Expense instance will store the values for the Expense and Party instance, whereas the table for the Party object will only store values for instances of the Party object. It will be appreciated that the overall database structure is illustrative only and by no means limits the methods and apparatus described herein with regard to the automatic generation of database components.
Referring now to
In response to the user request from client 12a, the SD server 16 retrieves the one or more code scripts that define user interface 500. These scripts are part of the computer program that implements the App Generator 40, and are either stored directly on the SD server 16 or at another location (e.g., system database 18) that is accessible to the SD server 16. The SD server 16 processes those code scripts to generate the markup language stream that is rendered in the browser of client 12a to display the user interface 500. It will be appreciated that the user interface 500 is illustrative only and the App. Generator 40 may utilize a variety of different user interfaces to allow users to interact with itself and/or the SD server 16.
Systems and methods according to the invention facilitate rapid development and/or modification of software applications without writing a single line of code.
This is depicted, by way of non-limiting example, in
By way of non-limiting example, if the user wants to modify the ExpenseReport3 workflow to add a new step to capture the full name and department of an Approving Manager as part of the workflow, the user will simply draw a box at the appropriate level (e.g., same level as Name, CreatedDate, CreatedBy) in section 501. The name and parent information for this new data layer will be Approving Manager and ExpenseReport, respectively. Within this new box for the Approving Manager data layer, the user will also draw two smaller boxes where the parent information for each box will be Approving Manager and the name of each box will be Full Name and Department. In other words, Approving Manager is added as a new ‘complex’ object type with two ‘simple’ embedded object types for Full Name and Department in the XML definition of the information structure for the ExpenseReport3 workflow. Once this information is captured and transmitted to SD server 16, the ExpenseReport3 workflow is automatically updated to create a new step for the Approving Manager object with data fields for Full Name and Department. Further details about individual workflow steps and related objects and data fields are provided below as part of the discussion for
Users can also interact with the App. Generator 40 through user interface 500 to rapidly build new applications. In the illustrated embodiment, a user can signal the App. Generator 40 executing on SD server 16 to build a new application by making the ‘New’ selection from drop-down 501. Upon making the selection, the user is presented with a pop-up menu to specify the name of the new application. Once the name is entered, screen 500 automatically displays a new box in the graphical display section 501 where the user can start creating the information structure graphically for the new application as described above.
In the illustrated embodiment, the graphical display section 501 is implemented using the <canvas> HTML element in the code scripts for user interface 500. This element allows users to do graphical manipulations (e.g., draw boxes) using scripting (e.g., JavaScript) that may also be embedded in the code scripts for the user interface. Furthermore, this scripting may contain the logic for converting data captured using the graphical user interface into the XML definition of the underlying information structure. It will be appreciated that the use of this HTML element and scripting is illustrative only and does not in any way limit the scope of the invention with regard to the input and manipulation of an information structure for an application using the methods and apparatus described herein. By way of non-limiting example, section 501 may be implemented using different technology (e.g., SVG, Flash etc.) in other embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, a graphical user interface such as section 501 may not be used at all to create and/or modify information structures for software applications. In certain computing environments for the software development system 10 described herein, a user may manually define and/or modify the information structure for an application in an XML or .txt file, which is in turn supplied to the SD server 16 through a file upload facility.
Referring now to
In this embodiment of the screen 600, a user of the ExpenseReport3 application can start creating specific instances of the ExpenseReport object that was defined using the App. Generator 40 user interface as shown in
The content displayed in the main panel 620 keeps changing as the user proceeds through the ExpenseReport3 workflow because the data fields for each step are displayed in the main panel 620. Furthermore, as the user creates instances of the ExpenseReport, Expense and Party objects at each step of the workflow, such instances can be listed in section 607 of the screen 600. Also, users have the option to sort the list of instances based upon the various data fields that are associated with each step in the flow. As shown in section 607 of
Users may also review a particular instance of an object by using the ‘Find’ section 606 of the screen 600. In the illustrated embodiment, a user can submit a query through the input field 611 by entering a value for any of the data fields and selecting (e.g., through a single-click selection or otherwise) the ‘Find’ button 612. Queries may be constructed using any unique identifier for any instance of the objects. Finally, user may end the use of the ExpenseReport3 application and log-off the system 10 by selecting (e.g., through a single-click selection or otherwise) the link 640.
In addition to supporting default user interface (UI) generation based on the information structure definition and the constraints specified in the meta-information structure, the methods and techniques described herein may also be used to override default (UI) generation by the App. Generator 40. By way of nonlimiting example, consider the following pseudo-code (B) where the definition of Name data field for the Expense step in the information structure definition for the ExpenseReport3 workflow has been changed to a drop-down list with a pre-defined list of values.
Based upon the updated definition for the Name field in the information structure and the constraint specified in the meta-information structure that select1 tag equates to a drop-down where only one value can be selected, the App Generator 40 would automatically generate screen 600 to show the Name data field as a drop-down as opposed to an input text field as shown in
It will be appreciated that the overall layout, configuration and functionality of screen 600 is exemplary and does not in any way limit the software development methods/techniques and apparatus described herein.
Described herein are methods and systems meeting the objects set forth above, among others. It will be appreciated that the illustrated embodiments and those otherwise discussed herein are merely examples of the invention and that other embodiments, incorporating changes thereto, fall within the scope of the invention, of which we claim.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/798,161 (pending), filed on Mar. 10, 2010, entitled SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE FOR CREATION AND MODIFICATION OF SOFTWARE, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/164,738, filed Mar. 30, 2009, entitled “A software system for creating a computer managed workflow,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4047059 | Rosenthal | Sep 1977 | A |
4344142 | Diehr, II et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4602168 | Single | Jul 1986 | A |
4607232 | Gill, Jr. | Aug 1986 | A |
4659944 | Miller, Sr. et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4701130 | Whitney et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4866634 | Reboh et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4884217 | Skeirik et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4895518 | Arnold et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4930071 | Tou et al. | May 1990 | A |
4953106 | Gansner et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5062060 | Kolnick | Oct 1991 | A |
5077491 | Heck et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5093794 | Howie et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5119465 | Jack et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129043 | Yue | Jul 1992 | A |
5136184 | Deevy | Aug 1992 | A |
5136523 | Landers | Aug 1992 | A |
5140671 | Hayes et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5193056 | Boes | Mar 1993 | A |
5199068 | Cox | Mar 1993 | A |
5204939 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5228116 | Harris et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5259766 | Sack et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262941 | Saladin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267175 | Hooper | Nov 1993 | A |
5267865 | Lee et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5270920 | Pearse et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276359 | Chiang | Jan 1994 | A |
5276885 | Milnes et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291394 | Chapman | Mar 1994 | A |
5291583 | Bapat | Mar 1994 | A |
5295256 | Bapat | Mar 1994 | A |
5297279 | Bannon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301270 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5310349 | Daniels et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311422 | Loftin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5326270 | Ostby et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333254 | Robertson | Jul 1994 | A |
5339390 | Robertson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5374932 | Wyschogrod et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5379366 | Noyes | Jan 1995 | A |
5379387 | Carlstedt et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381332 | Wood | Jan 1995 | A |
5386559 | Eisenberg et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5395243 | Lubin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5412756 | Bauman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421011 | Camillone et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421730 | Lasker, III et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5446397 | Yotsuyanagi | Aug 1995 | A |
5446885 | Moore et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450480 | Man et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5463682 | Fisher et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473732 | Chang | Dec 1995 | A |
5477170 | Yotsuyanagi | Dec 1995 | A |
5481647 | Brody et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499293 | Behram et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504879 | Eisenberg et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512849 | Wong | Apr 1996 | A |
5519618 | Kastner et al. | May 1996 | A |
5537590 | Amado | Jul 1996 | A |
5542024 | Balint et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542078 | Martel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548506 | Srinivasan | Aug 1996 | A |
5561740 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579223 | Raman | Nov 1996 | A |
5579486 | Oprescu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586311 | Davies et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596752 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597312 | Bloom et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608789 | Fisher et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611076 | Durflinger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627979 | Chang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630127 | Moore et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649192 | Stucky | Jul 1997 | A |
5655118 | Heindel et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664206 | Murow et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675753 | Hansen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678039 | Hinks et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689663 | Williams | Nov 1997 | A |
5715450 | Ambrose et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732192 | Malin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5754740 | Fukuoka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761063 | Jannette et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761673 | Bookman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765140 | Knudson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768480 | Crawford, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788504 | Rice et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795155 | Morrel-Samuels | Aug 1998 | A |
5809212 | Shasha | Sep 1998 | A |
5815415 | Bentley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819257 | Monge et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822780 | Schutzman | Oct 1998 | A |
5825260 | Ludwig et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826077 | Blakeley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826239 | Du et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826250 | Trefler | Oct 1998 | A |
5826252 | Wolters, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829983 | Koyama et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5831607 | Brooks | Nov 1998 | A |
5832483 | Barker | Nov 1998 | A |
5841435 | Dauerer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841673 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5864865 | Lakis | Jan 1999 | A |
5873096 | Lim et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875334 | Chow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875441 | Nakatsuyama | Feb 1999 | A |
5880614 | Zinke et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880742 | Rao et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886546 | Hwang | Mar 1999 | A |
5890146 | Wavish et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890166 | Eisenberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892512 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907490 | Oliver | May 1999 | A |
5907837 | Ferrel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910748 | Reffay et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911138 | Li et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918222 | Fukui et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920717 | Noda | Jul 1999 | A |
5930795 | Chen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5945852 | Kosiec | Aug 1999 | A |
5974441 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974443 | Jeske | Oct 1999 | A |
5978566 | Plank et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983267 | Shklar et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987415 | Breese et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990742 | Suzuki | Nov 1999 | A |
5995948 | Whitford et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995958 | Xu | Nov 1999 | A |
6008673 | Glass et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008808 | Almeida et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012098 | Bayeh et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020768 | Lim | Feb 2000 | A |
6023704 | Gerard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023714 | Hill et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023717 | Argyroudis | Feb 2000 | A |
6028457 | Tihanyi | Feb 2000 | A |
6037890 | Glass et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044373 | Gladney et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044466 | Anand et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6078982 | Du et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085188 | Bachmann et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085198 | Skinner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091226 | Amano | Jul 2000 | A |
6092036 | Hamann | Jul 2000 | A |
6092083 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094652 | Faisal | Jul 2000 | A |
6098172 | Coss et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105035 | Monge et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108004 | Medl | Aug 2000 | A |
6122632 | Botts et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125363 | Buzzeo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130679 | Chen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137797 | Bass et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144997 | Lamming et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151595 | Pirolli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151624 | Teare et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6167441 | Himmel | Dec 2000 | A |
6177932 | Galdes et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185516 | Hardin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185534 | Breese et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192371 | Schultz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194919 | Park | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212502 | Ball et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216135 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233332 | Anderson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233617 | Rothwein et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240417 | Eastwick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243713 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246320 | Monroe | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275073 | Tokuhiro | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275790 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281896 | Alimpich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282547 | Hirsch | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300947 | Kanevsky | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304259 | DeStefano | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308163 | Du et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313834 | Lau et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314415 | Mukherjee | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324693 | Brodersen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330554 | Altschuler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338074 | Poindexter et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341277 | Coden et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341293 | Hennessey | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344862 | Williams et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349238 | Gabbita et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351734 | Lautzenheiser et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356286 | Lawrence | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359633 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366299 | Lanning et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369819 | Pitkow et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370537 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380910 | Moustakas et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380947 | Stead | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381738 | Choi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389460 | Stewart et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389510 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393605 | Loomans | May 2002 | B1 |
6396885 | Ding et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405211 | Sokol et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405251 | Bullard et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415259 | Wolfinger et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415283 | Conklin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418448 | Sarkar | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421571 | Spriggs et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426723 | Smith et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429870 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430571 | Doan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430574 | Stead | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437799 | Shinomi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446065 | Nishioka et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446089 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446200 | Ball et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446256 | Hyman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448964 | Isaacs et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453038 | McFarlane et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463346 | Flockhart et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463440 | Hind et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469715 | Carter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469716 | Carter et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473467 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473748 | Archer | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493331 | Walton et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493399 | Xia et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493731 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493754 | Rosborough et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496812 | Campaigne et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496833 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502239 | Zgarba et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509898 | Chi et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6513018 | Culhane | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526440 | Bharat | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526457 | Birze | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529217 | Maguire, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529899 | Kraft et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529900 | Patterson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530079 | Choi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532474 | Iwamoto et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6539374 | Jung | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542912 | Meltzer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546381 | Subramanian et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546406 | DeRose et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549904 | Ortega et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556226 | Gould et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556983 | Altschuler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556985 | Karch | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559864 | Olin | May 2003 | B1 |
6560592 | Reid et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560649 | Mullen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567419 | Yarlagadda | May 2003 | B1 |
6571222 | Matsumoto et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577769 | Kenyon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583800 | Ridgley et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584464 | Warthen | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584569 | Reshef et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6594662 | Sieffert et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597381 | Eskridge et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597775 | Lawyer et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598043 | Baclawski | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606613 | Altschuler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625657 | Bullard | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629138 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636850 | Lepien | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636901 | Sudhakaran et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643638 | Xu | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6643652 | Helgeson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661889 | Flockhart et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661908 | Suchard et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678679 | Bradford | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678773 | Marietta et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678882 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684261 | Orton et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690788 | Bauer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691067 | Ding et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691230 | Bardon | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701314 | Conover et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711565 | Subramaniam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721747 | Lipkin | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728702 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728852 | Stoutamire | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732095 | Warshavsky et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732111 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748422 | Morin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750858 | Rosenstein | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751663 | Farrell et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754475 | Harrison et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6756994 | Tlaskal | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763351 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771706 | Ling et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772148 | Baclawski | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772350 | Belani et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778971 | Altschuler et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782091 | Dunning, III | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785341 | Walton et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788114 | Krenzke et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792420 | Stephen Chen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
RE38633 | Srinivasan | Oct 2004 | E |
6804330 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807632 | Carpentier et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810429 | Walsh et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6820082 | Cook et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829655 | Huang et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831668 | Cras et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839682 | Blume et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847982 | Parker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851089 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856575 | Jones | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856992 | Britton et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859787 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865546 | Song | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865566 | Serrano-Morales et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865575 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867789 | Allen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6918222 | Lat et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920615 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925457 | Britton et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6925609 | Lucke | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6927728 | Vook et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934702 | Faybishenko et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940917 | Menon et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944644 | Gideon | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954737 | Kalantar et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6956845 | Baker et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959432 | Crocker | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961725 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965889 | Serrano-Morales et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966033 | Gasser et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976144 | Trefler et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985912 | Mullins et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7020869 | Abrari et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028225 | Maso et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031901 | Abu El Ata | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035808 | Ford | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7058367 | Luo et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058637 | Britton et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064766 | Beda et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073177 | Foote et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076558 | Dunn | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7089193 | Newbold | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103173 | Rodenbusch et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124145 | Surasinghe | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139999 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143116 | Okitsu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7171145 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171415 | Kan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174514 | Subramaniam et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178109 | Hewson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194380 | Barrow et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7289793 | Norwood et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
RE39918 | Slemmer | Nov 2007 | E |
7302417 | Iyer | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7318020 | Kim | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7318066 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334039 | Majkut et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343295 | Pomerance | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353229 | Vilcauskas, Jr. et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398391 | Carpentier et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406475 | Dorne et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412388 | Dalal et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415731 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7505827 | Boddy et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7526481 | Cusson et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7536294 | Stanz et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7555645 | Vissapragada | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574494 | Mayernick et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7596504 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7640222 | Trefler | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647417 | Taneja | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7665063 | Hofmann et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7685013 | Gendler | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689447 | Aboujaoude et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7711919 | Trefler et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7779395 | Chotin et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7787609 | Flockhart et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7818506 | Shepstone et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7844594 | Holt et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7870244 | Chong et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7937690 | Casey | May 2011 | B2 |
7971180 | Kreamer et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7983895 | McEntee et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8001519 | Conallen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8037329 | Leech et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8073802 | Trefler | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8250525 | Khatutsky | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8335704 | Trefler et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8386960 | Eismann et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8468492 | Frenkel | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8479157 | Trefler et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8516193 | Clinton et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8843435 | Trefler et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8880487 | Clinton et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8924335 | Trefler et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8959480 | Trefler et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9026733 | Clinton et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9189361 | Khatutsky | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9195936 | Chase | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9270743 | Frenkel | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20010013799 | Wang | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010035777 | Wang et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047355 | Anwar | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049682 | Vincent et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052108 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054064 | Kannan | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010855 | Reshef et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013804 | Gideon | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029161 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042831 | Capone et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049603 | Mehra et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049715 | Serrano-Morales et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049788 | Lipkin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054152 | Palaniappan et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059566 | Delcambre et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070972 | Windl et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073337 | Ioele et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091677 | Sridhar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091678 | Miller et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091710 | Dunham et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091835 | Lentini et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093537 | Bocioned et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107684 | Gao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118688 | Jagannathan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120598 | Shadmon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120627 | Mankoff | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120762 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133502 | Rosenthal et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020177232 | Melker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178232 | Ferguson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181692 | Flockhart et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184610 | Chong et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001894 | Boykin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004934 | Qian | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004951 | Chokshi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009239 | Lombardo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014399 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037145 | Fagan | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050834 | Caplan | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050927 | Hussam | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050929 | Bookman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061209 | Raboczi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065544 | Elzinga et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066031 | Laane | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074352 | Raboczi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074369 | Scheutze et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084401 | Abel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109951 | Hsiung et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115281 | McHenry et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135358 | Lissauer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152212 | Burok et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154380 | Richmond et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030191626 | Al-Onaizan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198337 | Lenard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200254 | Wei | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200371 | Abujbara | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202617 | Casper | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222680 | Jaussi | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229529 | Mui et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229544 | Veres et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024603 | Mahoney et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034651 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049479 | Dorne et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049509 | Keller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054610 | Amstutz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064552 | Chong et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068517 | Scott | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088199 | Childress et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103014 | Teegan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117759 | Rippert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122652 | Andrews et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133416 | Fukuoka et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133876 | Sproule | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139021 | Reed et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145607 | Alderson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147138 | Vaartstra | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148586 | Gilboa | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162812 | Lane et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162822 | Papanyan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167765 | Abu Et Ata | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040205672 | Bates et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220792 | Gallanis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236566 | Simske | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243587 | Nuyens et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268221 | Wang | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268299 | Lei et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027563 | Fackler et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039191 | Hewson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044198 | Okitsu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050000 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055330 | Britton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059566 | Brown et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060372 | DeBettencourt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071211 | Flockhart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050104628 | Tanzawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125683 | Matsuyama et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132048 | Kogan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138162 | Byrnes | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144023 | Aboujaoude et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165823 | Ondrusek et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198021 | Wilcox et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216235 | Butt et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228875 | Monitzer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234882 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267770 | Banavar et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288920 | Green et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004845 | Kristiansen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015388 | Flockhart et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020783 | Fisher | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041861 | Trefler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053125 | Scott | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063138 | Loff et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064486 | Baron et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064667 | Freitas | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075360 | Bixler | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080082 | Ravindra et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080401 | Gill et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092467 | Dumitrescu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100847 | McEntee et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101386 | Gerken et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101393 | Gerken et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106846 | Schulz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060139312 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149751 | Jade et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167655 | Barrow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173724 | Trefler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173871 | Taniguchi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206303 | Kohlmeier et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206305 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218166 | Myers et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060271559 | Stavrakos et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271920 | Abouelsaadat | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288348 | Kawamoto et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005623 | Self et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010991 | Lei et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028225 | Whittaker et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038765 | Dunn | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055938 | Herring et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061789 | Kaneko et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094199 | Deshpande et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118497 | Katoh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130130 | Chan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136068 | Horvitz | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143163 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143851 | Nicodemus et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203756 | Sears et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208553 | Hastings et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226031 | Manson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233902 | Trefler et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239646 | Trefler | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245300 | Chan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260584 | Marti et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070294644 | Yost | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002823 | Fama et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046462 | Kaufman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077384 | Agapi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085502 | Allen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109467 | Brookins et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120593 | Keren | May 2008 | A1 |
20080163253 | Massmann et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184230 | Leech et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189679 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195377 | Kato et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080196003 | Gerken et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208785 | Trefler et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216055 | Khatutsky | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216060 | Vargas | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080263510 | Nerome et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090007084 | Conallen | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018998 | Patten, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090075634 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083697 | Zhang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090132232 | Trefler | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132996 | Eldridge | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138844 | Halberstadt et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150541 | Georgis | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158407 | Nicodemus et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164494 | Dodin | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171938 | Levin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090276206 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282384 | Keppler | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100011338 | Lewis | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100088266 | Trefler | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107137 | Trefler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100217737 | Shama | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110066486 | Bassin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120041921 | Canaday et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130007267 | Khatutsky | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130047165 | Goetz et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130231970 | Trefler et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254833 | Nicodemus et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130290249 | Merriman et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140019400 | Trefler et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140277164 | Ramsay et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150089406 | Trefler et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127736 | Clinton et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160070560 | Chase | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160098298 | Trefler et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105370 | Mellor et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19911098 | Dec 1999 | DE |
0 549 208 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0 669 717 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 996 916 | May 2000 | EP |
1 015 997 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 019 807 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 073 955 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 073 992 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 135 723 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1 163 604 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 183 636 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1 196 882 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 203 310 | May 2002 | EP |
1 208 482 | May 2002 | EP |
1 212 668 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1 240 592 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1 277 102 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 277 119 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 277 120 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 277 153 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 277 155 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 277 329 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 374 083 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 382 030 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 386 241 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1 393 172 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 393 188 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 402 336 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 407 384 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 430 396 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 438 649 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1 438 654 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1 438 672 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1 483 685 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 490 747 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 490 809 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 492 232 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 782 183 | May 2007 | EP |
1 830 312 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 840 803 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2 115 581 | Nov 2009 | EP |
9838564 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9840807 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9905632 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9945465 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9950784 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0033187 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0033217 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0033226 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0033235 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0033238 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0052553 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0052603 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0067194 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0140958 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0175610 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0175614 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0175747 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0175748 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0176206 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0177787 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0179994 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0221254 | Mar 2002 | WO |
0244947 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02056249 | Jul 2002 | WO |
02080006 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02080015 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02082300 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02084925 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02088869 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02091346 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02101517 | Dec 2002 | WO |
02103576 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03021393 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03029923 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03029955 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03030005 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03030013 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03030014 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03058504 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03069500 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03071380 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03071388 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03073319 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03077139 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03085503 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03085580 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004001613 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004003684 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004003766 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004003885 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004046882 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004061815 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004086197 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004086198 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004095207 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004095208 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004114147 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005001627 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005003888 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005010645 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005117549 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006081536 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007033922 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2008109441 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009097384 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alan Simpson et al.; Access 97 for Windows 95/NT; 1997 SYBEX; 16 pages; USPTO STIC—EIC 2100/2400. |
Dragos, A. Manolescu et al.; Dynamic Object Model and Adaptive Workflow; 1999 University of Illinois; 19 pages; <http://micro-workflow.com/PDF/domaw.pdf>. |
Wolfgang Schulze; Fitting the Workflow Management Facility into the Object Management Architecture; 1998 Springer; 9 pages; <http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4471-1286-0—12>. |
Stefan0 Ceri et al.; WIDE—A Distributed Architecture for Workflow Management; 1997 IEEE; pp. 76-79; <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=583705>. |
B. Surjanto et al.; XML Content Management based on Object-Relational Database Technology; 2000 IEEE; pp. 70-79; <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=882377>. |
Ewa Deelman et al.; Workflows and e-Science An overview of workflow system features and capabilities; 2009 Elsevier; pp. 528-540; <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X08000861>. |
G. Kappel; Active Object-Oriented Workflow Management; 1995 IEEE; pp. 727-736; <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=375484>. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US06/03160, mailed Jul. 21, 2008 (16 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US06/03160, dated Apr. 9, 2009 (14 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/US08/55503, mailed Jul. 28, 2008 (1 page). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2008/055503, mailed Sep. 17, 2009 (4 pages). |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US09/32341, mailed Mar. 11, 2009 (14 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2009/032341, mailed Aug. 12, 2010 (8 pages). |
Johnson et al., Sharing and resuing rules-a feature comparison of five expert system shells. IEEE Expert, IEEE Services Center, New York, NY, vol. 9, No. 3, Jun. 1, 1994, pp. 3-17. |
Jones et al., A user-centered approach to functions in excel. International Conference on Functional Programming, Uppsala, Jun. 30, 2003, pp. 1-12. |
Kim, W., Object-Oriented Databases: Definition and Research Directions, IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 2(3) pp. 327-341, Sep. 1990. |
Kuhn, H.W., The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2 (1955), pp. 83-97. |
Kuno, H.A., and E.A. Rundensteiner, Augmented Inherited Multi-Index Structure for Maintenance of Materialized Path Query Views, Proc. Sixth Int'l. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering, pp. 128-137, Feb. 1996. |
LaRue, J., Leveraging Integration and Workflow. Integrated Solutions, Accounting Today, SourceMedia, Aug. 2006, pp. 18-19. |
Lippert Eric, Adventures in Coding: Metaprogramming, Toast and the Future of Development Tools, Microsoft.com Blog, MSDN Home, published Mar. 4, 2004, 6 pgs. |
Mandal, et al., Integrating existing scientific workflow systems: The kepler/pegasus example. USC Information Sciences Institute, 2007, 8 pages. |
Manghi, Paolo, et. al., Hybrid Applications Over XML: Integrating the Procedural and Declarative Approaches, 2002 ACM, pp. 1-6. Retrieved Mar. 22, 2007. |
Markiewicz, M.E., et al., Object oriented framework development. ACM, 2001, 13 pages, <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=372771>. |
Markowitz, V.M., and A. Shoshani, Object Queries over Relational Databases: Language, Implementation, and Applications, IEEE Xplore, pp. 71-80, Apr. 1993. |
Marmel, Elaine, Microsoft Office Project 2007 Bible, ISBN 0470009926, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 2007, 961 pages. |
Maryanski, F., et al., The Data Model Compiler: A Tool for Generating Object-Oriented Database Systems, 1986 Int'l. Workshop on Object-Oriented Database Systems, IEEE, 73-84 (1986). |
McConnell, Steven C., Brooks' Law Repealed, IEEE Software, pp. 6-9, Nov./Dec. 1999. |
Mecca, G., et al., Cut and Paste, ACM, pp. 1-25 and Appendix I-IV (Jun. 1999). Retrieved Mar. 22, 2007. |
Mitchell, T.M., Machine Learning, Chapter 3, 1997, McGraw-Hill, pp. 52-80. |
Mitchell, T.M., Machine Learning, Chapter 6, 1997, McGraw-Hill, pp. 154-200. |
Morizet-Mahoudeaux, P., A Hierarchy of Network-Based Knowledge Systems, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 21(5), pp. 1184-1191, Sep./Oct. 1991. |
Pientka, B., et al., Programming with proofs and explicit contexts. International Symposium on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, ACM, 2008, pp. 163-173, <http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1390000/1389469/p163-pientka.pdf?>. |
Reinersten, Don, Is it Always a Bad Idea to Add Resources to a Late Project?, Oct. 30, 2000. Electronic Design. vol. 48, Issue 22, p. 70. |
Riccuiti, M., Oracle 8.0 on the way with objects: upgrade will also build in multidimensional engine. InfoWorld. Sep. 25, 1995;17(39):16. |
Richner, T., et al., Recovering high-level views of object-oriented applications from static and dynamic information. IEEE, 1999, 10 pages, <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=792487>. |
Salvini, S., and M.H. Williams, Knowledge Management for Expert Systems, IEEE Colloquium on ‘Knowledge Engineering’, 3 pages, May 1990. |
Schiefelbein, Mark, A Backbase Ajax Front-end for J2EE Applications, Internet Article, dev2dev <http://dev2dev.bea.com/1pt/a/433>, Aug. 29, 2005, 16 pages. |
Sellis, T., et al., Coupling Production Systems and Database Systems: A Homogeneous Approach, IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 5(2), pp. 240-256, Apr. 1993. |
Shyy Y.M., and S.Y.W. Su, Refinement Preservation for Rule Selection in Active Object-Oriented Database Systems, Proc. Fourth Int'l. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering, pp. 115-123, Feb. 1994. |
Singh, G., et al., Workflow task clustering for best effort systems with pegasus, Pegasus, 2008, 8 pages. |
Smedley, T.J. et al., “Expanding the Utility of Spreadsheets Through the Integration of Visual Programming and User Interface Objects,” School of Computer Science, Technical University of Nova Scotia, ACM, 1996; pp. 148-155. |
Srinivasan, V., et al., Object persistence in object-oriented applications. IBM Systems Journal, 1997, vol. 36, issue 1, pp. 66-87, <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber-5387186>. |
Stonebraker, M., The Integration of Rule Systems and Database Systems, IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 4(5), pp. 415-423, Oct. 1992. |
Sun, et al., “Supporting Inheritance in Relational Database Systems,” IEEE, pp. 511-518, Jun. 1992. |
Thuraisingham, “From Rules to Frames and Frames to Rules,” Al Expert, pp. 31-39, Oct. 1989. |
Vranes, S., et al., Integrating Multiple Paradigms within the Blackboard Framework, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 21, No. 3, Mar. 1995, pp. 244-262. |
Yang, Bibo; Geunes, Joseph; O'Brien, William J.; Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling: Past Work and New Directions, Apr. 2001, 28 pages, Research Report Jun. 2001, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida. |
[No Author Listed] About the Integrated Work Manager (IWM). Pegasystems, Inc., Apr. 30, 2009, 3 pages, <http://pdn-dev/DevNet/PRPCv5/KB/TMP9ad01zurnf.asp> . |
[No Author Listed] FreeBSD Project. “EDQUOTA(8)” in Free BSD System Manager's Manual. FreeBSD 8.2 Jun. 6, 1993. pp. 1-2. Retrieved from freebsd.org on Oct. 27, 2011. |
[No Author Listed] How SmartForms for Fair Blaze Advisor works, Fair Issac White Paper, http://www.FAIRISAAC.com/, Oct. 31, 2005, 8 pages (website no longer active). |
[No Author Listed] How to Configure and Customize the Universal Worklist. SAP Netweaver '04 and SAP Enterprise Portal 6.0. SAP AG. Version 1, May 2004, 65 pages. <http://www.erpgenie.com/sap/netweaver/ep/Configuring%20the%20UWL.pdf>. |
[No Author Listed] How to configure the IWM/IAC gateway. Pegasystems, Inc., Apr. 30, 2009, 4 pages, <http://pdn-dev/DevNet/PRPCv5/KB/TMP9cf8fzurq4.asp>. |
[No Author Listed] How to install the Integrated Work Manager (IWM). Pegasystems, Inc., Apr. 30, 2009, 6 pages, <http://pdn-dev/DevNet/PRPCv5/KB/TMP9br1ezurp8.asp>. |
[No Author Listed] HP Integrated Lights-Out 2, User Guide, Part No. 394326-004, HP, Aug. 2006, 189 pages. |
[No Author Listed] IP Prior Art Database, Options when returning work items in workflow management systems. IBM, IPCOM000027980D, 2004, 3 pages. |
[No Author Listed] IP Prior Art Database, Staff Queries and Assignments in Workflow Systems. IBM, IPCOM000142382D, 2006, 4 pages. |
[No Author Listed] IP Prior Art Database, Using work items to manage user interactions with adaptive business services. IBM TDB, IPCOM000015953D, 2003, 4 pages. |
[No Author Listed] Integrating with External Systems, PegaRULES Process Commander 5.2. Process Commander 5.2 reference. Pegasystems Inc, Cambridge, MA, 2006, 103 pages <http://pdn.pega.com/ProductSupport/Products/PegaRULESProcessCommander/documents/PRPC/V5/502/iwes/PRPC52—Integrating—with—External—Systems.pdf>. |
[No Author Listed] Localizing an Application, PegaRULES Process Commander. Process Commander 4.2 reference. Pegasystems Inc., Cambdrige, MA, 2006, 92 pages <http://pdn.pega.com/DevNet/PRPCv4/TechnologyPapers/documents/Localization0402.pdf>. |
[No Author Listed] Oracle Universal Work Queue: Implementation Guide. Release 11i for Windows NT. Oracle Corporation. Jul. 2001, 136 pages. <http://docs.oracle.com/cd/A85964—01/acrobat/ieu115ug.pdf>. |
[No Author Listed] Solaris 9 resource manager software. A technical white paper. Sun Microsystems, Inc., Palo Alto CA, 2002, 37 pages. XP-002291080. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2004 from <http://wwws.sun.com/software/whitepapers/solaris9/srm.pdf>. |
Bertino, E., and P. Foscoli, Index Organizations for Object-Oriented Database Systems, IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 7(2):193-209 (Apr. 1995). |
Bierbaum, A., et al., VR juggler: A virtual platform for virtual reality application development. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality 2001 Conference, IEEE, 2001, 8 pages, <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber-913774>. |
Breiman, L., Bagging predictors, Machine Learning, vol. 24, No. 2, Aug. 31, 1996, pp. 123-140, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. |
Brusilovsky, P., and De Bra, P., Editors, “Second Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia Proceedings,” Jun. 20-24, 1998. Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Hypertext'98. pp. 1-2. |
Burleson, D., Adding behaviors to relational databases, DBMS, 8(10): 68(5) (Sep. 1995). |
Busse, Ralph et al., Declarative and Procedural Object Oriented Views, IEEE, 1998, pp. 570-578, retrieved Mar. 22, 2007. |
Buyya et al., Economic Models for Resource Management and Scheduling in Grid Computing, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2002, vol. 14, pp. 1507-1542. |
Chan, T.W., and W. Hwang, Towards Integrating Logic, Object, Frame, and Production, Proc. Fourth Int'l. Conf. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, IEEE, pp. 463-469, Jun. 1992. |
Cheng, Cheng-Chung; Smith, Stephen F.; A Constraint Satisfaction Approach to Makespan Scheduling, AIPS 1996 Proceedings, pp. 45-52 (1996). |
Cheng, C.C. and Smith, Applying Constraint Satisfaction Techniques to Job Shop Scheduling, Annals of Operations Research, 70: 327-357 (1997). |
Cochrane, Roberta et al., Integrating Triggers and Declarative Constraints in SQL Database Systems, pp. 567-578, Proceedings of the 22nd VLDB Conference Mumbai (Bombay), India, 1996, retrieved Mar. 22, 2007. |
Damerau, F.J., Problems and some solutions in customization of natural language database front ends. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 3, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1985, pp. 165-184. |
Danforth, S., Integrating Object and Relational Technologies, Proc. Sixteenth Annual Int'l. Computer Software and Applications Conf., IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, pp. 225-226, Sep. 1992 (Abstract). |
Deelman, E., et al., Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems, submitted to Scientific Programming, Jan. 2005. Pre-journal publication, 22 pages. |
Deelman, E., et al., Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Scientific Programming, 13, pp. 219-237, 2005. |
DeMichiel, L.G., et al., Polyglot: Extensions to Relational Databases for Sharable Types and Functions in a Multi-Language Environment, Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf. on Data Engineering, IEEE, pp. 651-660, Apr. 1993. |
Devarakonda et al., Predictability of process resource usage: A measurement-based study on UNIX. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 1989;15(12):1579-1586. |
Communication for European Patent Application No. 05755530.2, dated Sep. 6, 2007 (2 pages). |
European Search Report for Application No. 05755530.2, dated Mar. 26, 2012 (3 Pages). |
European Office Action issued Aug. 31, 2012 for Application No. 05755530.2 (4 Pages). |
Communication for European Patent Application No. 07250844.3 enclosing European Search Report, dated Jul. 11, 2007 (6 pages). |
Communication for European Patent Application No. 07250844.3, dated Mar. 28, 2008 (1 page). |
European Office Action issued Jul. 9, 2012 for Application No. 07250844.3 (8 Pages). |
Communication for European Patent Application No. 07250848.4, dated Aug. 13, 2007 (EESR enclosed) (6 pages). |
Communication for European Patent Application No. 07250848.4, dated May 29, 2008 (1 page). |
Communication for European Patent Application No. 08731127.0, dated Oct. 13, 2009 (2 pages). |
Extended European Search Report issued Oct. 29, 2012 for Application No. 08731127.0 (8 pages). |
Fayad, M.E, et al., Object-oriented application frameworks. Communications of the ACM, Oct. 1997, vol. 40, issue 10, pp. 32-38, <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=262798>. |
Francisco, S., et al. Rule-Based Web Page Generation, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, Hypertext'98, Jun. 20-24, 1998, 9 pages. |
Gajos et al. SUPPLE: Automatically Generating User Interfaces. IUI 2004, 8 pages. |
Hague, Darren, Universal Worklist with SAP Netweaver Portal. Galileo Press, 2008, pp. 11-31. <http://www.sap-hefte.de/download/dateien/1461/146—leseprobe.pdf>. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/GB2004/000677, mailed Aug. 2, 2004 (15 pages). |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2004/020783, mailed Nov. 8, 2005 (2 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2004/020783, issued Feb. 13, 2006 (6 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/US05/018599, dated May 15, 2007 (1 page). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2005/018599, dated Jun. 5, 2007 (10 pages). |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15189385.6, issued Dec. 17, 2015 (9 pages). |
Eisenstein, et al., Adaptation in Automated User-Interface Design. IUI, 2000, pp. 74-81. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61164738 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12798161 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13897763 | US |