System, computing device, and method for document detection and deposit processing

Description

BACKGROUND

Electronic check image detection and remote check depositing are part of technological improvements to the manual process of check depositing known as remote deposit. In general, checks provide a convenient method for an individual such as a payor to transfer funds to a payee. To use a check, an individual usually opens a checking account, or other similar account, at a financial institution and deposits funds, which are then available for later withdrawal. To transfer funds with a check, the payor usually designates a payee and an amount payable on the check. In addition, the payor often signs the check. Once the check has been signed, it is usually deemed negotiable, meaning the check may be validly transferred to the payee upon delivery. By signing and transferring the check to the payee, the payor authorizes funds to be withdrawn from the payor's account on behalf of the payee.

While a check may provide a payor with a convenient and secure form of payment, receiving a check may put certain burdens on the payee, such as the time and effort required to deposit the check. For example, depositing a check typically involves going to a local bank branch and physically presenting the check to a bank teller.

To reduce such burdens for the payee, as well as the payor, remote deposit technology has been developed to include systems and methods that enable the remote deposit of checks that overcome the need for some of the manual processes in prior check deposit procedures. However, existing remote deposit systems typically utilize specific, deterministic algorithms to analyze the various features of digital images of checks that are captured by remote devices of account holders and transmitted to financial institutions for deposit. The deterministic algorithms, while typically a good tool for handling digital images having a fixed set of characteristics, may not be as accurate as desired in identifying features or qualities of captured images over a wider variation of characteristics, and thus may lead to delays or failures in the processing of remote deposits.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. Non-limiting and non-exhaustive descriptions are described with reference to the following drawings. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating principles. In the figures, like referenced numerals may refer to like parts throughout the different figures unless otherwise specified.

FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system for implementing remote deposit.

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary digital image depicting a check and a background.

FIG. 3 shows an exemplary modified digital image depicting a check and a background including edge coordinates.

FIG. 4 shows an exemplary segmented digital image depicting a check and a background.

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary grayscale histogram of a digital image.

FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a set of machine learning models that may be stored in the machine learning model repository illustrated in FIG. 1

FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram of a model training technique for training a ML model to identify bounding corners and crop an image of a check.

FIG. 8 shows a dewarping machine learning model.

FIG. 9 shows a denoising machine learning model.

FIG. 10 shows a duplicate check detection process.

FIG. 11 shows a duplicate check detection machine learning model training diagram.

FIG. 12 shows a block diagram of an exemplary computer architecture of a computing device or institution computer.

FIG. 13 shows a flow diagram of an image processing feature.

FIG. 14 shows a flow diagram of an image processing feature.

FIG. 15 shows a flow diagram of a method of determining suitability of a computing device for including machine learning models and deterministic algorithms for image processing tasks.

FIG. 16 shows a flow diagram of a method of determining which machine learning model or deterministic algorithm for image processing tasks to select for a particular remote deposit transaction.

FIG. 17 shows a flow diagram of a method of using a first machine learning model to select or download a second machine learning model or deterministic model for processing a check image.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The methods, devices, and systems discussed below may be embodied in a number of different forms. Not all of the depicted components may be required, however, and some implementations may include additional, different, or fewer components from those expressly described in this disclosure. Variations in the arrangement and type of the components may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the claims as set forth herein.

Within the technological field of remote deposit, a payor may present a check, either in paper or electronic versions, to a payee for deposit. To deposit the check with a financial account at a financial institution associated with the payee, the payee may scan a check in a digital image using a scanner, digital camera, or other imaging device in communication with a computing device. A financial institution may then receive from the payee the digital image of the check. The financial institution may then use the digital image to credit funds to the payee. Such remote deposit techniques utilize the efficient and accurate detection of a check depicted within a digital image, where part of the check image detection includes detecting and extracting the check image from background portions included in the digital image that are not part of the check image.

Traditional, deterministic, image processing algorithms can fail to clearly and reliably detect the border of a check. Such a failure can prevent successful processing of check contents and the failure of traditional algorithms can often be the result of insufficient contrast between the background portions and the check in a captured image. Another common challenge for successful image processing to find a check in an image with traditional algorithms is the presence of reflections or shadows in the image. As described herein, a machine learning model that may be more resilient over a range of color and lighting conditions than any single deterministic technique can be trained to identify a check from the background by, for example, identifying the bounding box coordinates (corners).

Yet another challenge presented by processing images captured of checks is that of de-morphing or de-warping a check image. Distortions in an image can occur when there is a large angle between the camera and the check, or where portions of the check are folded and appear at a different angle than another portion of the check in the image. Again, traditional, deterministic algorithms exist that can address certain of these distortions, however a deep learning (also referred to herein as machine learning) model is disclosed herein that may be trained to learn and apply the necessary translation, scaling, rotation and shearing of an image in a more robust manner that stand-alone algorithms.

Issues with identifying information within a check image may also be a challenge for systems that capture and process check images. For example, the printed text on a check often cannot be read correctly due to background noise. Traditional systems and deterministic algorithms can have difficulty consistently removing noise from the printed text. This noise may be in the form of the overlap of a signature or other handwritten notes on the printed text, reflections or shadows that are present in the image, creases or wrinkles in the check, and so on. Here again, a machine learning model may be generated and trained to identify and remove background noise so that a clean image is left for processing.

Yet another check processing task that institutions perform is duplicate check detection. Members of a bank or other financial institution may attempt to deposit the same check multiple times, either fraudulently or by accident. Existing techniques and systems for handling duplicate check detection typically involve a database of check numbers with a limited lookback window, or simply involve manual check reviews. These existing techniques are often subject to missed detection opportunities, and are ultimately susceptible to fraud losses. As also described herein, a machine learning model may be trained to recognize duplicate checks in a greater range of conditions than may be available in current techniques. In one implementation, a perceptual hash of an image may be encoded from the image that allows for an efficient image similarity check on a large scale that can handle many lighting and shadow variations.

The image processing steps for detecting and extracting the check image from the background portions may be implemented in whole, or in parts, on either a user device having captured the digital image, a remote server running an application for remote deposit, or both. Implementing these image processing steps are known to expend significant computing resources on a computing device, and so there are benefits to offloading, or sharing, some or all of the image processing between the user device and the remote server. However, with the improvements to the computing capabilities of mobile computing devices, it is within the scope of this disclosure for one or more, or all, of the image processing features to be implemented directly on the mobile computing device (e.g., user device). For example, the ability to select between existing deterministic algorithm and trained machine learning models may be implemented at the initial remote deposit application download stage, where the mobile computing device and/or remote server device communicate to exchange mobile computing device capabilities.

In one implementation, only a limited set of total available deterministic or machine learning enables techniques that the mobile computing device can efficiently be expected to execute will be transferred to the mobile device with the remote deposit application. In other implementations, the complete set of deterministic and trained machine learning models for image processing may be included in the downloaded app and the mobile computing device may select which of the algorithms or machine learning models to apply for a given image capture and processing session. Alternatively, the machine learning model need not be persistent on the mobile device and may be temporarily downloaded, on an as-needed basis, via a web interface or a previously downloaded application programming interface (API). Additionally, the download of the machine learning model(s) to the phone or other mobile device need not be directly from the financial institution or third party remote check deposit handling service. Instead, the model(s) or deterministic algorithms may be downloaded to the phone or mobile device from a local network inside a user's home.

In the disclosed embodiments, features are disclosed for dedicating image processing from the remote server to the user device, as well as for dedicating image processing from the user device to the remote server. The determination of where the image processing will be implemented may be determined, for example, according to detected attributes of the captured digital image depicting the check, computing capabilities of the mobile device including the image capture device, and/or environmental conditions (e.g., ambient light levels) detected when the digital image was captured. Given the processing advantage typically afforded a server-based system as compared to a remote device, such as a handheld tablet or smart phone, the bulk of the processing may be described below as primarily taking place on a server of an institution rather than on the remote device of a user. However, some or all of the functionality and circuitry may be included on the user device in different implementations. Also, with respect to the training of deep learning (machine learning) models, the processing power of a remote server is generally used, regardless of the location of the processing that later implements the trained model. In some alternative implementations, training for one or more of the models discussed herein may be performed at the user device. The training of a machine learning model can be updated with localized data from end users. The end user data may be transmitted back to a central server periodically or in real-time for periodic or real-time training updates to better optimize the model.

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an implementation of a system 100 in which example embodiments may be implemented. A user 105 is shown along with an institution system 205. The institution system 205 may be affiliated with an institution 200, which may be any type of entity capable of processing a transaction involving a negotiable instrument, such as processing checks and/or providing funds associated with checks. For example, the institution 200 may be a financial services institution such as a retail bank, an investment bank, an investment company, a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, a clearinghouse bank and/or a correspondent bank. A representative 185 of the institution 200 may provide assistance, via a representative computing device 187, during any one or more of the processes described herein.

A negotiable instrument typically includes a type of contract that obligates one party to pay a specified sum of money to another party. Negotiable instruments may include checks, money orders, cashier's checks, drafts, bills of exchange, promissory notes, and the like. A check instructs a financial institution to pay an amount of money from a specific account held in the payor's name with that financial institution to an account held in the payee's name. A money order is a trusted financial instrument that is a payment order for a pre-specified amount of money. It is a more trusted method of payment than a personal check because the funds for the amount shown on the money order must be prepaid. A cashier's check (also known as a bank check, official check, teller's check, bank draft or treasurer's check) is a check guaranteed by a bank and may be purchased from a bank. Cashier's checks are usually treated as cash since most banks clear them instantly.

For example, the computing device 109 may be a personal computer (PC), a laptop computer, a handheld computing device, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile phone, or a smartphone, for example. The computing device 109 includes an image capture device 115 for capturing an image of the check, where the image capture device 115 may be a digital camera, image scanner, or other device in which the image of the check 107 may be obtained. In some embodiments, the image capture device 115 may be camera with multiple different lenses, or multiple separate cameras each with its own lens. Each camera or camera lens of a multiple lens image capture device 115 may be controlled individually or concurrently to capture one or more images of a check at the same time or in sequence. Each camera lens may be the same or different to capture the image of a check from differing angles or offsets from each other camera lens. Alternatively or additionally, the lenses and/or the associated camera sensor or circuitry in a multiple camera embodiment of an image capture device 115 may be configured to capture a different portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, for example each lens or camera sensor may be calibrated to a respective one of visible frequencies, infrared frequencies or ultraviolet frequencies.

The user 105 may be an individual or entity who has an account 165 held at the institution 200 and is accessible via the institution system 205. The account 165 may be any type of account for depositing funds, such as a savings account, a checking account, a brokerage account, and the like. Although only one account 165 is shown, it is contemplated that the user 105 may have any number of accounts held at the institution 200. The user 105 may deposit a check 107 or other negotiable instrument document into the account 165 either electronically or physically. The institution 200 may process and/or clear the check 107, as well as other types of negotiable instruments.

The user 105 may remotely electronically deposit the check 107 at the institution 200 via the computing device 109 being operated by the user 105. For example, an application (sometimes referred to herein as an “app”) for remotely electronically depositing checks may be downloaded, from a third party provider such as the APPLE App Store or from the institution system 205, and installed on the computing device 109, where running the application on the computing device 109 enables the user 105 to remotely electronically deposit the check 107. It is noted that although examples and implementations described herein may refer to a check, the techniques and systems described herein are contemplated for, and may be used for, any negotiable instrument, such as a money order, a cashier's check, a check guaranteed by a bank, or the like. Similarly, the techniques and systems described herein are contemplated for and may be used with any form or document whose image may be captured with a scanner, camera, or other imaging device for subsequent storage and/or processing.

The user 105 may access the institution 200 via the institution system 205 by opening a communication pathway via a communications network 140 using the computing device 109. The communications network 140 may be representative of an intranet, the Internet, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) network, a public switched telephone network (PSTN), a cellular network, a voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) network, or the like. The user 105 may also communicate with the institution 200 or the institution system 205 by phone, email, instant messaging, text messaging, web chat, facsimile, postal mail, and the like.

There may be several ways in which the communication pathway may be established, including, but not limited to, an Internet connection via a website 218 of the institution system 205, where the website 218 includes content 219 for accepting remote deposits. The user 105 may access the website 218 and log into the website 218 using credentials, such as, but not limited to, a username and a password.

The user 105 may operate the image capture device 115 installed on the computing device 109 to generate a digital check image of the check 107. The digital check image may be used to create a digital image file 135 that is sent to the institution system 205 and used by the institution 200, in conjunction with the institution system 205, to process a deposit of the check 107 whose image is depicted within the digital image file 135. In an implementation, the digital image file 135 may be augmented by secondary data which may be information relating to the deposit of the check 107, such as an account number and a deposit amount, for example.

When capturing the digital check image, the check 107 may be placed on a background, such that the digital check image that is captured by the image capture device 115 comprises an image of the check (e.g., a check image) and a portion of the background (e.g., a background image). Any background may be used, although a dark background or a consistently colored background may provide more optimal results for distinguishing the check image from the background image within the overall initial image. In an implementation, white and yellow backgrounds may not be used. It is noted that although examples and implementations described herein may refer to a check image and check data, the term “check image” may refer to the check in a digital image (as opposed to the background image) and the term “check data” may refer to any data in a digital check image (as opposed to background data). Thus, “check image” and “check data” may refer to the non-background portion of the image and data from the non-background portion of the image in implementations involving any negotiable instrument, form, or document.

In an implementation, the digital check image generated by the image capture device 115 comprises check data and background data. The check data pertains to the check image in the digital check image and the background data pertains to the background in the digital check image on which the image of the check 107 is disposed. An example of such a digital check image 201 is further described with respect to FIG. 2. The digital check image 201 illustrated in FIG. 2 is comprised of a check image 210 and a background image 250 surrounding the check image 210. The check image 210 is shown to include check data such as name, address, date, payment instructions, payment amount, memo, signature line, and Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) line information. The background image 250 includes image data for the surface, or whatever other environment, is behind the check 107 when the image capture device 115 captured the digital check image 201. Between the check image 210 and the background image 250, are edges of the check 107. An edge separates the check image 210 from the background image 250, and edge detection techniques will be described in more detail herein.

In an implementation, a minimum ratio of check image size (or area) to background image size (or area) may be provided in the digital check image generated by the image capture device 115. Examples include, and are not limited to, at least a minimum portion (e.g., five percent) of the digital check image may comprise a check image. Other examples of check image to background size include at least a minimum portion (e.g., 1 percent) of the digital check image may comprise a background image, and the check image may be surrounded by at least one pixel of background all the way around the check image, or other predetermined requirements.

Referring back to the computing device 109 shown in FIG. 1, the computing device 109 may comprise an image processing engine 120 that executes image processing features used during the remote deposit process. The image processing engine 120 shown in FIG. 1 includes background processor circuitry 121, a chroma key analyzer 122, an image comparator 123, a grayscale converter 124, an image segmenter 125, segment processor circuitry 126, a segment recombiner 127, and image processor circuitry 128. Additionally, one or more machine learning models may be included in a model repository 129 of the image processing engine 120 that can be executed by the image processor circuitry 128 to handle one or more image processing tasks described herein rather than use a discrete, deterministic algorithm.

When a deterministic algorithm is selected for processing the digital check image 201 depicting the check 107, the background processor circuitry 121 may perform various tasks with respect to the background image 250 included on the digital check image 201. The background image 250 may be a surface on which the check 107 is placed when the digital check image 201 is captured by the image capture device 115. In conjunction with the image capture device 115, the background processor circuitry 121 detects portions of the digital check image 201 corresponding to the background image 250, and distinguishes the background image 250 from the check image 210. The background processor circuitry 121 may further generate a modified digital check image that replaces the background image with a replacement background image. The replacement background image may be selected from one or a plurality of predetermined background images. For example, a predetermined background image may be comprised of a solid color. In an implementation, the background processor circuitry 121 may store the background image 250 and/or the modified digital check image in a storage memory associated with the computing device 109.

Based on the background image 250 being separately detected from the check image 210 according to the techniques applied by the background processor circuitry 121, the image processing engine 120 may identify specific edge coordinates of the check image 210, such as edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 illustrated in FIG. 3. A modified digital check image 300 may be generated by the image processing engine 120 that includes the edge coordinates, where the modified digital check image 300 is included in the digital image file 135 transmitted to the institution system.

An example of an existing deterministic algorithm, as compared to the machine learning model developed from deep learning approaches discussed in greater detail below, is first discussed. In an implementation, the deterministic approach to finding edges of a check may utilize chroma key technology to detect edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 of the check image 210, and/or provide a uniform or consistent replacement background for the check image 210 in the digital check image 201. Chroma key is a technique for mixing two images together, in which a color or color range from one image is removed (or made transparent), revealing another image behind it. This technique is also known as color keying, green screen, and bluescreen. The chroma key analyzer 122 may use any known chroma key technique for removing the original background image 250 and replacing it with (e.g., revealing) a replacement background image. Based on the background image 250 being separately detected from the check image 210 according to the chroma key technique(s) applied by the chroma key analyzer 122, the image processing engine 120 may identify specific edge coordinates for the check image 210, such as the edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 illustrated in FIG. 3. The modified digital check image 300 may be generated by the image processing engine 120 that includes the edge coordinates, where the modified digital check image 300 is included in the digital image file 135 transmitted to the institution system. Although the edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 are illustrated to correspond to corners of the check image, other edge coordinates may correspond to non-corner edge portions that comprise an outer perimeter of the check.

Alternatively or additionally to the deterministic chroma key approach, the background image 250 may be separately distinguished from the check image 210 within the digital check image 201 based on a difference in image characteristics between the background image 250 and the check image 210 analyzed by the image comparator 123. After generating a modified digital check image that replaces the background image 250 with a predetermined replacement background image, the image comparator 123 may compare the modified digital check image with the predetermined replacement background image. By making this known image comparison, the image comparator 123 determines that overlapping the overlapping image portions correspond to a background portion, and the remaining image portions correspond to the check image 210. The image comparator 123 may then determine this difference and subtract the background portion from the modified digital check image to result in obtaining the check image 210 alone without background portions. Based on the check image 210 being separately extracted from the digital check image 201 according to the image comparison technique(s) applied by the image comparator 123, the image processing engine 120 may identify specific edge coordinates for the check image 210, such as the edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 illustrated in FIG. 3. The modified digital check image 300 may be generated by the image processing engine 120 that includes the edge coordinates, where the modified digital check image 300 is included in the digital image file 135 transmitted to the institution system.

In addition, or alternatively, edge detection for the check image may be implemented by comparing the digital check image 201 to a predetermined rectangular shape that represents an outline of the check. This way, the check image 210 may be separately distinguished from the background image 250 within the digital check image 201 based on a matching of the predetermined rectangular shape with edge outlines of the check image 210 analyzed by the image comparator 123. After matching the predetermined rectangular shape to the edge outlines of the check image 210, the image comparator 123 may identify the edge coordinates of the check image 210. Based on the check image 210 being separately identified from the digital check image 201 according to the image comparison technique(s) applied by the image comparator 123, the image processing engine 120 may identify specific edge coordinates for the check image 210, such as the edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 illustrated in FIG. 3. The modified digital check image 300 may be generated by the image processing engine 120 that includes the edge coordinates, where the modified digital check image 300 is included in the digital image file 135 transmitted to the institution system.

According to some embodiments, image processing, such as the edge detection, may be applied to segmented pieces of the digital check image 201. The grayscale converter 124 may convert the digital check image 201 generated by the image capture device 115 to grayscale using known techniques. In photography and computing, a grayscale digital image is an image in which the value of each pixel is a single sample, that is, it carries only intensity information. Images of this sort are composed exclusively of shades of gray, varying from black at the weakest intensity to white at the strongest. Conversion of a color image to grayscale is well known and any known technique(s) may be used.

The grayscale image generated by the grayscale converter 124 may be provided to the image segmenter 125, where the image segmenter 125 divides the image into a predetermined number of segments, such as 4 segments, 6 segments, 8 segments, or other predetermined number. Each segment may comprise a portion of the check image 210 (i.e., the check data) and a portion of the background image 250 (i.e., the background data) and an edge between the two portions. The segments may be equal in size or may differ in size. An example of a segmented image 400 divided into four segments is shown in FIG. 4.

The segment processor circuitry 126 may process each of the segments to identify and/or remove background data. In an implementation, histograms may be used to detect or identify background data and check data. The histogram of each segment can be used to determine an edge of the check image 210 from the background image 250 within the segment, so that the background image 250 may be removed or disregarded for subsequent processing.

A histogram is a well-known graph and may be used to display where all of the brightness levels contained in an image are found, from the darkest to the brightest. These values may be provided across the bottom of the graph from left (darkest) to right (brightest). The vertical axis (the height of points on the graph) shows how much of the image is found at any particular brightness level. An example of a histogram 500 for a segment of an image comprising check data and background data is further described with respect to FIG. 5. An edge between the check image 210 and the background image 250 may be identified to be those points on the digital check image corresponding to the threshold point (i.e., low point) reflected on the histogram 500 shown in FIG. 5.

The segment recombiner 127 recombines the processed segments to generate a recombined image comprising a depiction of the check 107. Based on the recombined image, the image processing engine 120 may identify specific edge coordinates for the check depicted in the recombined image, such as the edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 illustrated in FIG. 3. The segment recombiner 127 may process the recombined image (including the edge coordinates) to be included with the digital image file 135 transmitted to the institution system 205 for deposit of the check 107 depicted in the modified digital check image.

In addition to, or instead of, the deterministic techniques for various image processing tasks, such as the edge detection and corner identification noted above, the image processing engine 120 may include a machine learning model repository 129 containing one or more trained machine learning models for each desired image processing task. Referring to FIG. 6, which illustrates one example of a machine learning model repository 129, several different trained machine learning models (ML models 1 through N) 602 may be included. Each of the ML models 602 in the model repository 129 may consist of a model parameter set 604 and the functional relationship component 606. As described below, the parameter set 604 contains the parameter data, that was achieved by training the model 602, and the parameter set 604 is used to process the input data (e.g. check image data from the captured image depicting the check) according to the functional relationship component 606. The functional relationship component 606 may include the type of matrix manipulation or convolution algorithm to be applied to the model parameter set 604 and the input data, and the basic instructions for how the input data and model parameters 604 are to be applied to the input data by the image processing circuitry 128. The model parameter set 604 is data that has been trained in a separate model training process prior to being made available for download to, and storage on, the computing device 109. For example, each ML model 602 may be trained at a central location and then downloaded as part of the remote deposit app from a 3rd party app store or the institution.

In order to improve on standard algorithmic/deterministic techniques for identifying the check 210 from the background and finding the corners or edges of the check, an ML model, such as an image cropping model 700 (See FIG. 7), may instead be implemented. In other words, rather than use one or more of the deterministic algorithm techniques discussed above for finding the corners and/or edges (e.g., via the chroma key, image comparator with background replacement and document segmentation described above) an image cropping model having been separately trained using deep learning techniques such as discussed in FIG. 7 may be downloaded as part of a downloadable app or software executable by the computing device 109. The final trained model may include the parameter set 604 that results from the training process and the relationship components 606 for the image cropping model. The relationship components may include the functions to be applied to the model parameters and digital image file, such as convolutions and/or matrices for manipulating and applying the parameters to the digital image of the check captured by, and being remotely deposited by, the computing device 109.

Referring to FIG. 7, one embodiment of an image cropping model 701 may be trained using an efficient binarized convolutional network (XNOR-Net) to accurately identify bounding box coordinates for cropping the check in the digital check image. Each of a plurality of test check images, where the correct bounding box coordinates 702 of the check 210 inside the image 201 are already known, may be processed using the binarized convolutional network to “train” or converge on system parameters for the model that may then be applied to any random check to accurately identify the bounding box coordinates of that random check. The robustness of the image cropping model 700 be strengthened by using a large number of training checks that represent a very large variety of conditions, including different shadows, colors, lighting, creases and fold lines, and so on. The binarized convolutional network technique trains this model by taking a feature and performing a convolution across the test check. A predetermined number of features are each processed via convolution to create a plurality of feature maps, one for each feature.

In one implementation of training this image cropping model 700, a feature may be a two dimensional array of pixels (for example a 3×3 array of 9 total pixels) with a particular pattern. The pattern may be, for example, a specific number and location in the 3×3 array of dark pixels. That feature is then convolved with different 3×3 windows 704 of pixels of the test check and the result is stored in the first level feature map 706 for that feature. Essentially, the 3×3 window 704 of a feature is shifted by one pixel and convolved with the test check pixels at that location until the window has been scrolled through the entire test check image. This process of convolution is repeated for each feature (each different 3×3 pixel pattern in this example) until all of the predetermined features have had a respective feature map 706 generated of a plurality of features. Although the feature sets used in this step may include every possible permutation of numbers dark pixel and patterns for a 3×3 array, the computational power and time necessary to handle all permutations may be unnecessarily large and so only a fixed number of patterns, which may be predefined by the particular machine learning model, are typically convoluted with the test check into respective feature maps.

After creating the initial feature maps 706, the process of training the image cropping model illustrated in FIG. 7 next proceeds with a subsampling step 708 to achieve resolution reduction and more global feature mapping. The subsampling step 708 automatically reduces each region of the first feature map, for example taking each 50×50 portion of the each feature map and reducing it to a 5×5 array. A new set of features for that 5×5 array are then put through convolutions resulting in a new set of feature maps 710 for each of those new features, and this process of subsampling and then processing new feature convolutions is repeated a predetermined number of times set for the model. The output of the image cropping model for the test check is a set of bounding box coordinates 702 that are then compared to the known bounding box coordinates for that test check. When the coordinates of the model in training do not match the actual known coordinates, the processor of the computer system training the model will adjust one or more features (e.g., swap out a feature originally used with a different feature at one or more of the different convolution stages), and reprocess the test check to see if the next result is closer to the known correct result for the bounding box coordinates. Which feature is selected, and the amount and magnitude of the changes the computer system training the model applies to that particular feature, may be accomplished using a variety of algorithms. In one implementation, a gradient descent algorithm may be used to make changes and iterate until the parameters of the model converge to most accurately match the known output of the test check. This process is then repeated for each of the test checks used to train the model 700. The final feature set 712 achieved at the end of the training of the model 700 is then fixed and form the parameter set of a trained model that is stored with the functional relationship information on how to apply the model parameters to future check image information.

Similarly, rather than use a discrete, deterministic algorithm to de-skew or de-warp check images, the model repository 129 of the image processing engine 120 may also include a trained demorphing transformation machine learning model 800. Referring to FIG. 8, the demorphing model 800 may be trained by providing training data consisting of images of checks 802 with skew or warp issues and known de-skewed, de-warped results. Any of a number of base algorithms for the training of this particular deep learning model may be implemented. As one example of a suitable candidate base algorithm for use in training the demorphing model 800, a spatial transformation network algorithm, such as described in Max Jaderberg et al. “Spatial Transformation Networks” June 2015 (available from https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02025v1) may be used. As with the edge and corner detection of the image cropping model described above, the demorphing model may be trained with many different examples of training data inputs: differing warp or skew inputs and combined with different lighting, noise or other features. The resulting output may be a spatial transformation matrix 804 to apply to the digital image of the check to achieve the final image, or even a final de-skewed/de-warped image 806 in more sophisticated trained models.

As illustrated in FIG. 9, another trained model that may be included in the model repository 129 of the image processing engine 120 is a denoising and binarization model 900. In order to recognize printed material on a check, an optical character recognition (OCR) process is typically applied during check processing. A challenge in the remote deposit of checks is the fact that, in many instances, there exists information that has been handwritten on the check that may obscure important printed information. For example, a signature or a memo line entry on a check may overlap the MICR information (which contains routing or account number information). This may, in turn, cause errors or general failure of an OCR process and thus cause a remote deposit attempt to fail. Other types of image noise that may cause an OCR process to fail include reflections or shadows across the text, or a crease or wrinkle crossing printed text. Instead of using typical determinative algorithms, a machine learning model may be trained to identify and remove this background noise.

As illustrated in FIG. 9, an example 902 of handwriting “noise” obscuring MICR text is shown, along with the desired output 904 of a denoising process prior to OCR being applied. Deterministic algorithms may be attempted to identify and remove specific types of noise, however a deep learning model may be trained and disseminated that may handle a wider variety of input noise variations in a faster and more effective manner.

As shown in FIG. 9, a server or other computing device may train a suitable denoising model 900 by using training data and processing that training data through one or more of convolutional auto-encoders, cycle-consistent adversarial networks and capsule networks 906. The training checks used for this particular machine learning model 900 may include checks with different parts of the printed data obscured and the known correct printed data available to adjust the parameters during the training.

Yet another trained model that may be included in the model repository 129 of the image processing engine 120 is a duplicate check detection model 1000. Unlike the image cropping model 700, the demorphing model 800 and the denoising and binarization model 900, the duplicate check detection model 1000 is trained determine if a currently processed check is similar enough to be flagged as a duplicate of a previously deposited check. As illustrated in FIG. 10, a new check image 1002 processed in the computing device 120 is essentially compared to prior images of previously deposited checks 1004 and, if the new check image is very close to a prior deposited check image, then the remote deposit process may be stopped, or the transaction flagged 1006 for future closer inspection. Unlike a deterministic algorithm, which might simply compare MICR numbers of prior checks and the new check, the duplicate check detection model 1000 may be trained to analyze a large number of feature similarities, for a large number of different lighting or other differences, in addition to being able to recognize MICR information.

As shown in FIG. 11, the duplicate check detection model 1000 may be trained using deep auto encoders. The encoding process may be a perceptual hash (or pHash) technique 1100 that transforms original check image 1102 into a hashed representation that allows for a family of slight variations in the appearance of a check (e.g., different lighting, folds, tears, etc.) to be clustered in a node representing the variations of a learnt check 1104 that allows for a more robust comparison of an input check to prior check information. Application of the duplicate check detection model 1000 will allow the remote server receiving the check image for the mobile computing device to cease check processing and send a rejection message to the mobile computing device for display on the mobile computing device, or to flag the transaction for later review, when the new check image 1002 is determined to be a duplicate of a previously deposited check image 1004. If implemented on the mobile computing device, rather than the institution server or other central computing device, then the transmission of the device may alert the user to a potential problem and avoid sending the check information to the institution or other central server, automatically prevent transmission of the image or check information from the mobile device, or send an alert to the institution or central server to cease processing, when the trained model indicates that the new check image is identified as associated with a duplicate check.

As noted earlier with respect to FIG. 1, in an implementation, some or all of the image processing described as being implemented by one or more components of the image processing engine 120, may be performed by the institution system 205 after the institution system 205 receives the digital image file 135 from the computing device 109.

The image processor circuitry 128 of the computing device 109, alone or in combination with other of the components comprising the image processing engine 120, may operate to implement one or more image processing features such as to remove warping or de-warp a digital image, to crop a digital image, to de-skew a digital image (e.g., rotate the image to horizontal or vertical alignments), to identify the corners/edges within a digital image, or adjust brightness, tint, contrast, or other image attribute of a digital image, or other known digital image processing capability. In one implementation, the image processor circuitry 128 may include a single processing element, or multiple separate processing elements, such as embedded processors including specialized graphics processors known as graphics processing units (GPUs) available from NVIDIA Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif.

The user 105 may thus generate a digital check image of the check 107 using the image capture device 115 on the computing device 109. For example, after endorsing the check 107, the user 105 may operate the image capture device 115 to capture a digital image of the front sides and/or back sides of the check 107 and store the digital image(s) as a digital image file on a storage memory of the computing device 109. The images of the front side and the back side of the check 107 may be processed using the techniques described herein. The images may be processed as separate files or as images in a single file. The images of the front side and the back side of the check 107 may be captured sequentially, e.g., pursuant to the user 105 flipping the check 107 over after an image of the front of the check 107 has been captured.

The digital image file 135 comprising the digital image depicting the check 107 may be transmitted to the institution system 205. The digital image may be the original digital image captured by the image capture device 115, or a modified digital image having one or more image processing techniques applied. For example, the modified digital image may include the edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 described herein. The computing device 109 transmits the digital image file 135, which may include secondary data, to the institution system 205 along with a request to deposit the check 107 into an account, such as the account 165. In an implementation, the user 105 may attach the digital image file 135 to an email, short message service (SMS) text, or other form of electronic message, and send the digital image file 135 to the institution system 205 using the computing device 109. However, other techniques for sending a digital image file 135 to the institution system 205 may be used, such as providing a digital image file 135 from storage to the website 218 associated with the institution system 205.

The institution 200 in conjunction with the institution system 205 may process the deposit request according to the digital image and any secondary data included in the digital image file 135. Thus, the institution 200 in conjunction with the institution system 205 may process the digital image file 135 comprising the digital image depicting the check 107 for deposit.

In an implementation, the institution system 205 may extract the check image 210 from the digital image file 135 and process the check 107 from the digital image for deposit, according to any one or more of the image processing techniques described herein. The institution system 205 may use only machine learning models, such as described in FIGS. 7-11, to process the check. The institution system may alternatively use a mix of deterministic algorithm and machine learning models, may selectively use deterministic or machine learning models that differ from those used at the computing device, or may utilize a mixture of machine learning models for some processing functions and deterministic algorithms for other functions. Any image processing technology, software, or other application(s) may be used to retrieve the digital image of the check 107 from the digital image file 135 and to obtain the relevant data of the check 107 from the digital image file 135. The institution system 205 may determine whether the financial information associated with the check 107 is valid. Also, because of the dynamic nature of prior check deposit information, in one embodiment only the institution system may apply the machine learning model for checking duplicate check detection.

Upon receipt and processing of the digital image file 135 and approval of the check 107 associated therewith, the institution 200 may credit the funds of the check 107 to the account 165. It will be appreciated that the examples herein are for purposes of illustration and explanation only, and that an embodiment is not limited to such examples.

In an implementation, the computing device 109 may be a mobile device that comprises a digital camera which can capture a digital image of the check 107 by taking a picture of the front and/or back of the check 107. The back of the check may provide endorsement verification, such as the signature of the person or party the check is made out to. The user 105 may send the digital image file 135, including the check image, to the institution system 205 using the mobile device. An exemplary computing device 109 is described with respect to FIG. 6. It is contemplated that any device that is capable of generating a digital image may be used to make a digital image of the check 107 which may be processed for sending to the institution system 205 as a digital image file 135. Additional devices that may be used in the generation and/or transmission of a digital image include a digital camera, a photocopier, a fax machine, and the like, for example.

The institution system 205 may include any combination of systems and subsystems such as electronic devices including, but not limited to, computers, servers, databases, or the like. The electronic devices may include any combination of hardware components such as processors, databases, storage drives, registers, cache, random access memory (RAM) chips, data buses, or the like and/or software components such as operating systems, database management applications, or the like. According to an embodiment, the electronic devices may include a network-based server that may process the financial information and may receive the digital image file 135 from the computing device 109.

The electronic devices may receive the digital image file 135 and may perform an initial analysis on the quality of the image of the check 107 in the digital image file 135, the readability of the data contained therein, or the like. For example, the electronic devices may determine whether the amount payable and other information may be readable such that it may be obtained and processed by the institution system 205 to credit the account 165 associated with the user 105.

The institution system 205 may include a user interface circuitry 220, an image processor 222, and a data source access engine 227. The user interface circuitry 220 may generate and format one or more pages of content 219 as a unified graphical presentation that may be provided to the computing device 109 or a representative computing device 187. In an implementation, the page(s) of content 219 may be provided to the computing device 109 and/or the representative computing device 187 via a secure website 218 associated with the institution system 205.

In an implementation, the institution system 205 may use the image processor 222 to process the digital image file 135 comprising the image(s) 137 of the check 107 received from the user 105 for use by the institution 200 in the processing and/or clearance of the check 107. The image processor 222 may process multiple frames of the image if the image is comprised of multiple frames (e.g., the front side and the back side of a check).

FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary computer architecture 1200 for a computing device such as any one of the computing device 109, institution system 205, or another computing device. The computer architecture 1200 includes system circuitry 1202, display circuitry 1204, input/output (I/O) interface circuitry 1206, and communication interfaces 1208. The graphical user interfaces (GUIs) 1205 displayed by the display circuitry 1204 may be representative of GUIs generated by the application for remote deposit. The GUIs may be displayed locally using the display circuitry 1204, or for remote visualization, e.g., as HTML, JavaScript, audio, and video output for a web browser running on a local or remote machine such as the computing device 109 or institution system 205.

The GUIs 1205 and the I/O interface circuitry 1206 may include touch sensitive displays, voice or facial recognition inputs, buttons, switches, speakers and other user interface elements. Additional examples of the I/O interface circuitry 1206 includes microphones, video and still image cameras, headset and microphone input/output jacks, Universal Serial Bus (USB) connectors, memory card slots, and other types of inputs. The I/O interface circuitry 1206 may further include magnetic or optical media interfaces (e.g., a CDROM or DVD drive), serial and parallel bus interfaces, and keyboard and mouse interfaces.

The communication interfaces 1208 may include wireless transmitters and receivers (“transceivers”) 1210 and any antennas 1212 used by the circuitry of the transceivers 1210. The transceivers 1210 and antennas 1212 may support Wi-Fi network communications, for instance, under any version of IEEE 802.11, e.g., 802.11n or 802.11ac, or other wireless protocols such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, WLAN, cellular (4G, LTE/A). The communication interfaces 1208 may also include serial interfaces, such as universal serial bus (USB), serial ATA, IEEE 1394, lighting port, I2C, slimBus, or other serial interfaces. The communication interfaces 1208 may also include wireline transceivers 1214 to support wired communication protocols. The wireline transceivers 1214 may provide physical layer interfaces for any of a wide range of communication protocols, such as any type of Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet, optical networking protocols, data over cable service interface specification (DOCSIS), digital subscriber line (DSL), Synchronous Optical Network (SONET), or other protocol. The communication interfaces 1208 may communicate with remote computing devices via a network, such as the communications network 140.

The system circuitry 1202 may be representative of any combination of hardware, software, firmware, application programming interface, or other circuitry for implementing the features of the remote deposit application described herein. For example, the system circuitry 1202 may be implemented with one or more systems on a chip (SoC), application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), microprocessors, discrete analog and digital circuits, and other circuitry. The system circuitry 1202 may implement any of the image processing features described herein. As an example, the system circuitry 1202 may include one or more processors 1216 and memory 1220.

The memory 1220 stores, for example, control instructions 1223 for executing the features of the remote deposit application running on the computing device 109, and/or institution system 205, as well as an operating system 1221. In one implementation, the processors 1216 execute the control instructions 1223 and the operating system 1221 to carry out any of the features for the remote deposit application. For example, the control instructions 1223 for the remote deposit application includes instructions that, when executed by the processors 1216, implement the features corresponding to the image processing engine 120, which may include the deterministic image processing algorithms and or the ML models discussed previously. The memory 620 also includes control parameters 1222 that provide and specify configuration and operating options for the control instructions 1223 (such as the image processing technique selection instructions discussed herein), operating system 1221, and other functionality of the computer architecture 1200.

FIG. 13 shows a flow diagram 1300 describing one implementation of image processing features by the image processing engine 120 as part of a remote deposit solution. The image processing features described by the flow diagram 1300 includes those relating to edge/corner detection for determining coordinates of the edges of a check depicted in a digital image.

At 1301, an account owner (e.g., payee to an amount written on a check document, referred to herein as a user) may receive a check from a third party (e.g., payor of the check), and may endorse the check by signing the back of the check in the designated field. If the user wishes to deposit the check into an account, such as a savings and/or checking account, the user may also write in an account number below the signature on the back of the check.

At 1302, the user may operate the computing device 109 to open a communication pathway with the institution system 205 associated with an account of the user for depositing funds. The communication pathway may be implemented by logging into a website operating within the institution system 205, for example. In addition to, or alternatively, a remote deposit application may be downloaded onto the computing device 109. Executing the remote deposit application to run on the computing device 109 may initiate opening of the communication pathway. The communication pathway may be established after the user authenticates access to the institution system 205 using user specific authentication credentials such as, but not limited to, a username and a password, or biometric information such as fingerprints, voice recognition, or facial recognition information.

At 1303, a digital check image of the check may be captured by the image capture device 115. The user may manually operate the image capture device 115 to capture the digital check image to include the check and a background portion. According to some embodiments, the remote deposit application running on the computing device may automatically capture the digital check image when a set of predetermined criteria is determined to be satisfied. For example, the remote deposit application may control the image capture device 115 to capture the digital check image after detecting the check is aligned within an alignment guide displayed on a display screen of the computing device 109, where the display screen displays a field of view of the image capture device 115. According to another example, the remote deposit application may control the image capture device 115 to capture the digital check image after detecting the check is in focus for the digital image capture by the image capture device 115. According to another example, the remote deposit application may control the image capture device 115 to capture the digital check image after detecting the check comprises at least a predetermined portion of the digital check image to be captured by the image capture device 115.

Also at 1303, a deposit request is initiated. The deposit request may include selecting an account in which to deposit the check. In an implementation, the user may select a “deposit check” option provided on a graphical user interface (GUI) displayed on the computing device 109. The user may also input one or more of the following check information through the GUI: check amount, date, the account the check funds should be deposited in, comments, routing number, or other check data.

At 1304, edge detection and corner identification is executed by the image processing engine 120 according to any one or more of the edge detection processes described herein. In one implementation, the cropping machine learning model 700 is executed by processing the captured digital image using the trained model. The edge detection process includes distinguishing the check image from the background image that comprises the overall digital check image captured by the image capture device 115. By executing the edge detection on the digital check image, edge coordinates for the check image are determined. For example, the edge detection may determine the edge coordinates 702 as shown in FIG. 7.

According to some other embodiments, deterministic algorithms may be used instead of applying the machine learning model. In those other embodiments, the edge detection implemented at 1304 may include one or more of the following processes: scaling down the digital check image for faster processing (scale factor depends on image size), converting the digital check image to grayscale, using close and/or open morphs on the digital check image to eliminate noise, binarizing the digital check image using a dynamic threshold algorithm (e.g., Otsu algorithm), running through multiple cropping logic algorithms, e.g., using OpenCV, until a “check” is found within the digital check image (e.g., 4 predetermined algorithms may be applied). To determine if a crop was successful, the crop result may be run through a crop validator that checks aspect ratio, area, skew, zoom, and/or other image analysis for validating a successful crop. The resulting digital check image may be run through focus detection to determine if the digital check image is blurry, and a refocusing process may be applied if blurriness is detected within a predetermined range. After multiple “successful” digital check images have been processed, the final digital check image is ready (e.g., considered a modified digital check image), along with four corner check coordinates and/or an image size of the modified digital check image.

At 1305, a modified digital check image (e.g., modified digital check image 300) is generated that includes the edge coordinates (e.g., bounding box coordinates 702 from the cropping model as shown in FIG. 7 or edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 from a deterministic model as shown in FIG. 3).

At 1306, the modified digital check image may undergo one or more further image processing steps. The image processing steps may include any one or more of the image processing functions attributed to the image processor 128, as described herein. These one or more additional image processing steps may include only processing the modified image via machine learning models such as those described above, only processing the image using techniques based on deterministic algorithms, or a mixture of both.

At 1307, the resulting processed image is stored within a digital image file. According to some embodiments, the digital image file may also include supplemental information, as described herein. At 1308, the digital image file is transmitted to the institution system 205. After receipt by the institution system 205, the institution system may further process the digital image file, and deposit the funds corresponding to the check depicted in the digital image file. The digital image file may include the digital check image in a known digital image format (e.g., a JPEG digital image file). According to some embodiments, the digital image file may further include edge coordinate information for edges detected within the digital check image by the image processing engine 120 at the computing device 109. The edge coordinate information may be in the following exemplary formats (exemplary coordinates are provided):

{

“frontImageCoordinates”: [

- 186.0,
- 282.0,
- 1368.0,
- 294.0,
- 1374.0,
  - 828.0
  - 174.0,
  - 798.0

“frontImageWidth”: “1440”,

“backImageWidth”: “1500”,

“frontImageHeight”: “1080”,

“backImageHeight”: “1000”

}

Further description of the processes that may be implemented on the digital image file by the institution system is described with reference to the flow diagram 800 shown in FIG. 14. According to the flow diagram 1400 shown in FIG. 14, the institution system 205 receives the digital image file from the computing device 109 at 801.

At 1402, edge detection is executed by the institution system 205 according to any one or more of the edge detection processes described herein. The edge detection process results in distinguishing the check image from the background image that comprises the overall digital check image captured by the image capture device 115. By executing the edge detection on the digital check image, edge coordinates for the check image are determined. For example, the edge detection may determine bounding box coordinates 702 from the trained machine learning cropping model as shown in FIG. 7 or edge coordinates 301, 302, 303, 304 from a deterministic model as shown in FIG. 3.

According to some embodiments, the edge detection executed by the institution system 205 may be different from the edge detection executed by the image processing engine 120 of the computing device 109. In one implementation, the edge detection at the institution system may be a machine learning model such as discussed above, while the edge detection at the computing device may be a deterministic algorithm version. In other implementations, the computing device and the institution system may both use different trained machine learning models, or may each use different deterministic algorithm edge detection techniques.

For example, with respect to the deterministic techniques of edge detection, the edge detection at 1402 at the institution system 205 may include one or more of the following: scaling the digital check image by a predetermined amount (e.g., scale down the digital check image by a half (½)), converting the digital check image to a gray scale image, using close and/or open morphs on the digital check image to eliminate noise, binarizing the digital check image using a dynamic threshold algorithm (e.g., Otsu's method), and/or applying Hough transform algorithm to identify lines in the digital check image. The edge detection at 1402 may further include iterating through all the identified lines from the digital check image, and discarding away any lines that do not correspond to a check edge, where a check edge may be determined according to one or more of the following rules: vertical lines must be angled between 95 and 85 degrees or between 275 and 265 degrees, horizontal lines must be angled between 195 and 175 degrees or between 360 and 355 degrees, discard away lines that lie completely in the top fourth or bottom fourth of the image as these lines have a high likelihood of being image noise data, discard away lines that lie completely in the right fourth or left fourth of the image as these lines have a high likelihood of being image noise data, and/or find the average distance between every line and the center of the digital check image and throw away any outlier lines that are more than a predetermined distance from the center of the digital check image. The edge detection at 1402 may further include creating a bounding box around remaining lines after the line removal process, as the remaining lines have a high likelihood of actually corresponding from the check depicted in the digital check image. If creating the bounding box around the remaining lines does not produce a check21 valid image, then another attempt to create a bounding box around contours of the digital check image may be implemented. The contours may be detected according to a contour detection algorithm such as the Suzuki85 algorithm.

At 1403, conditions detected during the edge detection implemented by the image processing engine 120 may be compared to conditions detected during edge detection implemented by the institution system 205. The conditions may include any environmental conditions (e.g., brightness levels) that may have affected the quality of the digital check image captured by the image capturing device 115. In addition or alternatively, as the edge detection implemented by the institution system 205 may be different from the edge detection implemented by the image processing engine 120 of the computing device 109, an accuracy of the edge detection implemented by the image processing engine 120 may be compared to an accuracy of the edge detection implemented by the institution system 205.

At 1404, the institution system 205 selects one of the edge coordinates from the edge coordinates included in the digital image file received from the computing device 109, or the edge coordinates determined by the institution system 205. The institution system 205 may select the edge coordinates based on predetermined criteria such as, for example, related to the detected conditions, or related to the determined accuracy of the edge coordinates. When the selection is based on the detected conditions, the institution system 205 may select the edge coordinates determined by the image processing engine 120 on the computing device 109 when the conditions indicate the edge detection processes implemented by the image processing engine 120 would result in a greater accuracy than the edge detection processes implemented by the institution system 205. When the selection is based on the accuracy of the edge detection, the institution system 205 may select the edge coordinates determined to be more accurate.

At 1405, the institution system 205 identifies the check image from the digital image file based on the selected edge coordinates. From the identified check image, the check data contained within the check image may be extracted.

At 1406, the institution system 205 processes the check depicted in the check image to extract the check data contained therein. Processing of the digital image file may include retrieving financial information regarding the check. The financial information may comprise the MICR number, the routing number, a check amount, or other information found on the check. The processing step may include implementation of one of more of ML models such as the dewarping 800, or denoising 900, models discussed above, or may implement deterministic techniques using known algorithms, before extracting financial information from the image.

At 1407, after retrieving the financial information from the check in an electronic data representation form, the institution system 205 determines whether the financial information is valid. For example, the institution system 205 may perform an initial analysis on the quality of the data representation, the readability of the data representation, or the like. For example, the electronic devices may determine whether the account number, amount payable, or the like may be readable such that they may be parsed and processed by the institution to credit an account associated with the user. If the financial information is determined to be valid, the electronic data representation may be processed by the institution system 205, thereby depositing the money in the user's account 165. If the financial information is determined to be invalid, then the user may be advised. For example, the institution system 205 may transmit an email, a web message, an instant message, or the like to the user indicating that the financial information associated with the electronic data representation may be invalid. The user may determine how to proceed by selecting an option on the web message, replying to the email, or the like.

The remote deposit software application, or app, that a user computing device 109 downloads from a third party or institution may be customized by the third party or institution. In one embodiment, the ability for a computing device 109 that is user operated, such as a smartphone, tablet or other computing device, to handle certain machine language models for image processing or duplicate check detection may be determined when the app is requested, such that the computing device is only provided those features or types of image processing software that the computing device can properly execute. For example, the hardware and operating system information for the computing device 109 may be provided to the third party or institution system 205 and the computing device 109 capabilities assessed by the third party app provider or institution. Referring to FIG. 15, when the third party app provider or institution is queried by the computing device for a remote deposit app, or for an update to an existing remote deposit app, the information on the computing device capabilities may be looked up in a database at the third party or institution (at 1502). Alternatively, the query may include the processor of the computing device 109 automatically generating the computing device capabilities in a message that is provided to, or requested by, the third party or institution system 205. The data may include model information, processor information, operating system, memory availability and so on.

Upon receipt of the information, the institution system 205 may determine if the computing device of the user is capable of handling the processing and memory requirements for each machine learning model that the institution system 205 or third party app store can include in the downloadable remote deposit app (at 1504). The institution system 205 may, for example, be able to select from one or more machine learning models and deterministic models and match the computing device capabilities with only machine learning models, in type or number, that the computing device can effectively handle (at 1506). Alternatively, or in addition, to the computing device capability check, the institution system 205 may selectively include machine learning models or deterministic models in the remote deposit app that will differ from any machine learning or deterministic algorithm techniques the institution system 205 will itself be using on check images sent via the app during a remote deposit process.

After selecting the machine learning modes and/or deterministic technique instructions the computing device 109 can best utilize, the downloadable app may be configured to include those models or techniques and the institution system 205 may transmit them over the network connection to the computing device (at 1508). In yet other implementations, the downloadable app may be configured by the institution server 205 with a plurality of machine learning models and/or deterministic algorithm instructions at the time the app is first downloaded, and the institution server 205 may dynamically select which of the machine learning models or deterministic techniques to activate at the computing device 109 at the time a remote deposit query is initiated by the computing device.

In another embodiment illustrated in FIG. 16, when the downloaded app stored on the computing device already includes more than one ML model and/or deterministic algorithm technique for a given image processing task, for example a ML model and a deterministic technique are included in the app that are each capable of separately handling background detection and cropping, the computing device may select which particular method to use. The process may start when the computing device receives user input to initiate the remote deposit app for depositing a new check (at 1602). The remote deposit app would then be executed by the processor of the computing device to provide instructions, which may be text and/or graphics, to the user to properly locate and align the check in the viewing arear of a camera or other image capture mechanism associated with the computing device (at 1604). The image that is then captured by manual input from the user or automated capture by the device is received in memory at the computing device (at 1606). The computing device 109 may then determine the state of the captured image, such as the amount of contrast, lighting variations and so on (at 1608). Based on the determined state, the computing device 109 may select which of the two or more image processing techniques available for a particular image processing task should be selected (at 1610). For example, a quality measurement below a predetermined threshold would automatically cause the computing device to utilize a machine learning model for the task and a quality at or above the predetermined threshold would trigger use of a deterministic algorithm for the task. This may take place for only one of the typical image processing tasks, such as edge detection/cropping, or for more than one of the image processing tasks for which there are more than one ML model or deterministic algorithm available in the downloaded app. The captured image may then be processed at the computing device using the selected image processing too (ML model or deterministic algorithm) (at 1612).

In an alternative embodiment, the process of FIG. 16 may be modified to both select the optimal machine learning model and to adjust the settings of the computing device to default to a particular set-up configuration. Referring to FIG. 17, the computing device 109 may download a remote capture application that includes a first machine learning model trained to select the optimal one of a plurality of trained image processing machine learning models (at 1702). This first trained model that recognizes the optimal second machine learning model may be part of a previously downloaded application, but the second machine learning model may be one that is selected from a plurality of trained models and later downloaded once the first machine learning model identifies the optimal second machine learning model. The first machine learning model may be one that has been trained to recognize the current environment the computing device 109 and check to be scanned are in, and for then selecting the second machine learning model that is best suited for handling image processing in view of the recognized environment. The environmental factors may include lighting and shadow detected, the type computing device used to capture the check image, and so on. This first machine learning model may also be trained to recognize specific check type (personal check, bank check, etc.) and check design type (e.g. striped, solid, personalized patterns, logos, cartoon characters and so on) and to factor in selection of the optimal second machine learning model for image processing not only optimized for the recognized environment, but for the specific type and design of the check.

The first trained machine learning model may be executed on the computing device 109 to capture an initial image of the check and automatically determine the image capture environment (for example, lighting, shadows, skew and/or noise) for the check that is captured, and may also may determine the type of check and the check design in the image (at 1704). Based on the information it has been trained to look for regarding image capture environment and check type and design, the first machine learning model may determine if there is an optimal trained second machine learning model that may be used to handle image processing and extract the check information (at 1706). The determination of whether a second model is “optimal” may be a comparison of percentage success rates, for the determined environment and check type/design, for a known plurality of specialized second machine learning models (each trained more rigorously for particular different environment or check type/design) in comparison to a default second trained model or deterministic technique that already may be part of the earlier downloaded application. If there is no second trained model that matches the determined environment and/or check type/design such that it would be more optimal than a more generalized default second machine learning model already present on the computing device 109, then the default second machine learning model may be used (at 1712). If there is a better match to the environment or check type/design in a second machine learning model known to the first machine learning model, then that optimal second machine learning model may be downloaded to the computing device 109 and used to process the captured image (at 1708, 1710).

In yet other embodiments, alone or in combination with any of the above, it is further contemplated that a trained machine learning model may also output computing device specific instructions to alter one or more settings of the computing device 109. Referring to the example of FIG. 17, the first trained machine learning model may not only identify the remote capture environment to select a second trained machine learning model for the image processing and data extraction, it may also instruct the computing device to adjust its image capture settings for a next image capture session, after the current one, based on the current determined image capture environment. As one example, the machine learning model may prepare the operating settings of the computing device 109 for a low light or other determined environmental condition based on the currently detected environmental conditions. The setting that may be automatically changed by the model may include the type of light capture. In one embodiment, the machine learning model may instruct the device to capture the check image in infrared light, or to change a charge coupled device (CCD) setting of a sensor in the image capture device associated with the computing device. In alternative embodiments, the machine learning model can not only automatically adjust current operating setting of the image capture device of the computing device, it may also change a default operating setting for a similar environmental setting (e.g. a low light environment) for a future image capture session.

In embodiments where the image capture device consists of a camera with multiple lenses or multiple cameras as noted previously, the processor of the user's computing device 109 may execute downloaded instructions to assist with check edge detection/corner identification, via a trained machine learning model or a discrete algorithm, by adding in the factor of depth perception available from simultaneously captured images from the multiple cameras that are separately positioned as the image capture device.

The use of multiple camera lenses/multiple cameras as the image capture device on a single computing device 109 can not only increase the detail provided on the checks themselves to improve the processing and accuracy of data pulled from the images, but can enhance security. In one implementation, the computing device 109 can use different information acquired by each lens of the same check to better identify/authenticate the user of the user device. As one example, the rotational angle and distance of each lens to the check during image capture of the check maybe used to determine a more precise angle of the user device to the check. This information may then, in turn be used in a deterministic algorithm or a machine learning model to compare to prior measurements of user device angle of rotation and distance from a check typically measured for that user. The multiple camera lens image capture device information may be used in combination with, or separately from, other user identifiable information entered into or gathered by the computing device. User entered data may include name, password, biometric, token or other direct verification information. This information may be combined with Global Positioning System (GPS) location information and sensed user information, such as how the computing device is being held via the multiple camera lenses, to modify a confidence level that the user is who he or she claims to be.

Deposit suspension actions, or additional verification tasks, may be triggered at the computing device when one of more of the verification criteria do not match expectations of the system for a given user. If one of more the rotational angle or distance measurements do not result in the computing device being held in a manner expected for that particular user, then an additional authentication step may be triggered at the computing device 109 and any further deposit processing stopped. For example, the processing circuitry may execute an application running on the computing device 109 that suspends check processing for that image until an additional authentication step (e.g. user is presented with an additional authentication challenge question, or an additional biometric assessment or measurement is requested) is successfully completed. Alternatively, a machine learning user verification model may be implemented that has been trained to assess all of the available user-entered and device-sensed parameters and automatically allow a deposit transaction to proceed when enough of the parameters provide a threshold confidence level of user authenticity.

The machine learning model may implement different levels of verification according to predetermined transaction risk levels. For example, the computing device may only utilize the rotational angle and/or distance measurements from each lens to recognize a particular user's usage pattern of the computing device when an amount of the check deposit is above a minimum amount. In this manner higher fraud risk transactions will trigger the user device usage pattern measurement and lower fraud risk (e.g. lower transaction amounts) will not trigger the elevated user verification mechanism. Computing device 109 processing resources and power usage may thus be reduced except for when higher risk transactions are involved.

Other implementations of a multiple camera lens image capture device may include examining details of the check the user plans to deposit to verify user-specific features. In this embodiment, the user-specific aspects of the check to be deposited may can be relied on alone, or in combination with other user verification methods, such as the device orientation pattern noted above, to verify a user or strengthen the collection of user verification parameters used to verify the user of the computing device. Rather than utilizing the various different perspectives of the multiple lenses to identify a way a user is holding the user device, the multiple camera lenses can take a more critical look at the check to be deposited to identify bends, creases, folds or tears in the check that match a pattern of those parameters found in prior checks deposited by that user. As one example, a machine learning model may be trained from past deposits from the user to look for a location of creases in a check representing a fold pattern in checks that the particular user puts in checks he or she deposits (e.g. from a habit of folding a check in a certain way, placing it in a wallet, and then later unfolding it for a remote deposit operation). As another example of check condition parameters that may be used to identify the user via a trained machine learning model, the multiple lens image capture device may be used to acquire information on the depth of the indentations made by the user's signature endorsing the check, the color and content of the ink used in the signature, the positioning of the endorsement signature and the endorse, endorsement signature itself. One or more of these pieces of information may be applied to a trained machine learning that will either permit a deposit transaction to move forward, or will interrupt and pause the deposit process for additionally authentication instructions to be displayed to the user and acted on before further processing is permitted.

In addition to the computing device usage and distinguishing check characteristics that may be tracked to determine or verify the user of the computing device, the background surrounding the check in the captured image may be used to verify authenticity of a user and raise the confidence level that a transaction is not fraudulent. Assuming a user typically deposits checks from a limited number of locations (e.g. kitchen counter or desk at home), then a same background or set of different backgrounds surrounding the check can be expected for deposits from the user. In one implementation, the image processing engine 120 of the computing device 109 may include in its machine learning model repository 129, or download from a remote server, a trained machine learning user verification model that identifies one or more of the device usage patterns, check feature patterns or background patterns of image capture transactions for a particular user. With respect to use of background patterns to verify user identity, a multi-camera lens image capture device may not only capture the overall pattern of the background, but may determine texture (e.g., wood grain, surface roughness or carpet fiber texture) and finer light quality details (content of light spectrum of lighting in area where image is being captured, amount or direction of types of lighting that may be analyzed in the trained machine learning model to verify a user or at least a trusted location that is being used for the user's deposit activities. This background determination, via a trained machine learning model established from that user's past deposits, may provide another layer of verification that the deposit transaction is from a legitimate source.

The features of how a computing device is being held or operated, where the computing device is located, and of the user treatment of the check to be deposited, may be the focus of separate of combined trained machine learning models that execute on the computing device or remotely via data provided by the computing device. Each user may have a separate account stored locally on the user computing device, at a financial institution server, or in cloud storage that stores previously captured checks and images from that user that is used to build a history for that user and that may be used to train a machine learning/artificial intelligence-type model to profile the user for authentication and fraud prevention in future remote deposit transactions.

In alternative embodiments, the computing device may also use the trained machine learning model(s) related to user verification to switch transaction modes from a check deposit transaction to a different transfer format. In one implementation, the computing device may search for the availability of another funds transfer mechanism to substitute for the more rigorous check deposit process. As one example, a person-to-person (P2P) transaction that bypasses typical check clearance and other check deposit procedures may be automatically investigated by the computing device. For example, if enough of the authentication/verification parameters have been satisfied in a predetermined number of transactions for the user, the computing device may automatically use the data gathered from the current check image to trigger a P2P transaction from the payor bank to the payee bank rather than proceed with a check deposit transaction. In this embodiment, the current image captured by the computing device may use the heightened authenticity scrutiny available from processing the check image captured (e.g. via the multiple camera lens image capture device) through the one or more machine learning models trained with user specific data on device usage, check features and/or background parameters. If the current image meets the authenticity and user verification threshold, and the user has met a threshold number of prior check deposit transactions also satisfying the authenticity and user verification tests, then the computing device may either automatically contact the payor and payee banks to initiate a P2P transaction, or it may interrupt the current check deposit operation to query the user, via the display of the computing device, regarding whether to proceed with a check deposit or to instead switch the transaction to a P2P transaction.

It should be understood that the various techniques described herein may be implemented in connection with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the presently disclosed subject matter, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium. When the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the presently disclosed subject matter. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computing device generally includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. One or more programs may implement or use the processes described in connection with the presently disclosed subject matter, e.g., through the use of an API, reusable controls, or the like. Such programs may be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language and it may be combined with hardware implementations.

Although exemplary embodiments may refer to using aspects of the presently disclosed subject matter in the context of one or more stand-alone computer systems, the subject matter is not so limited, but rather may be implemented in connection with any computing environment, such as a network or distributed computing environment. Still further, aspects of the presently disclosed subject matter may be implemented in or across a plurality of processing chips or devices, and storage may similarly be spread across a plurality of devices. Such devices might include personal computers, network servers, and handheld devices, for example.

Various implementations have been specifically described. However, other implementations that include a fewer, or greater, number of features for each of the apparatuses, methods, or other embodiments described herein are also possible.

Claims

1. A portable computing device, comprising: a processor;memory; andinstructions stored on the computer-readable medium, the instructions configured to, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: capture a digital check image depicting a check;input the data from the captured digital check image into a trained machine learning image cropping model to determine a plurality of edge coordinates corresponding to the check depicted in the digital check image;detect a check image included in the digital check image based on the plurality of edge coordinates;generate a digital image file including the digital check image and the edge coordinates; andtransmit the digital image file to a remote server for deposit.
2. The computing device of claim 1, wherein the instructions are configured to, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to: remove the background image from the digital check image by cropping the digital check image based on the edge coordinates determined by the trained machine learning model.
3. The computing device of claim 1, wherein the instructions are configured to, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to generate the digital image file to include check data received via user input.
4. The computing device of claim 1, wherein the instructions are configured to, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to: input the data from the captured digital check image into a trained machine learning image denoising model;remove handwriting from printed text on the check depicted in the digital check image based on an output of the trained machine learning image denoising model.
5. The computing device of claim 1, wherein the instructions are configured to, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to: input the data from the captured digital check image into a trained machine learning image dewarping model;obtain a coordinate conversion map for dewarping the check depicted in the digital check image based on an output of the trained machine learning image dewarping model.
6. The computing device of claim 5, wherein the instructions are configured to, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to: input the data from the captured digital check image into a trained machine learning duplicate model, wherein the trained machine learning duplicate check model comprises a perceptual hash trained model;when the trained machine learning duplicate model is stored on the portable computing device, prevent transmission of the data from the captured check to the remote server in response to a determination by the trained machine learning duplicate model that the check depicted in the digital check image based is a duplicate check.
7. The computing device of claim 4, wherein the instructions are configured to, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to: input the data from the captured digital check image, after removing the handwriting from the printed text based on an output of the trained machine learning image denoising model, into a trained machine learning image dewarping model;obtain a coordinate conversion map for dewarping the check depicted in the digital check image based on an output of the trained machine learning image dewarping model.
8. A portable computing device, comprising: a processor;a memory; andwherein the processor is configured to: download an app for performing image processing on, and remotely depositing to an institution, a digital check image of a check, wherein the downloaded app comprises a trained machine learning model for executing a first image processing task:control, using the downloaded app, an image capture device associated with the portable computing device to capture the digital check image;input, using the downloaded app, the captured digital check image into the trained machine learning model to modify the digital check image in accordance with the first image processing task;process the modified digital check image, using the downloaded app, with a deterministic algorithm to execute a second image processing task that is different from the first image processing task;transmit the modified and processed digital check file to a remote server for deposit.
9. The portable computing device of claim 8, wherein the trained machine learning model for executing the first image processing task comprises an image cropping model configured to cause the processor of the portable computing device to remove a background image from the digital check image by cropping the digital check image based on edge coordinates determined by the trained machine learning model.
10. The portable computing device of claim 8, wherein the trained machine learning model for executing the first image processing task comprises an image demorphing model configured to cause the processor of the portable computing device to remove a skew from the digital check image.
11. The portable computing device of claim 10, wherein the image demorphing model causes the processor to generate a spatial transformation matrix to apply to the digital check image.
12. The portable computing device of claim 8, wherein the trained machine learning model for executing the first image processing task comprises a denoising model configured to cause the processor of the portable computing device to remove handwritten marks from overlapping printed text in the digital check image.
13. The portable computing device of claim 8, wherein the portable computing device comprises a smart phone and image capture device associated with the portable computing device comprises a digital camera.
14. The portable computing device of claim 8, wherein the downloaded app comprises a plurality of trained machine learning models and the processor is configured by the downloaded app to select between two or more trained machine learning models for use in a particular image processing task after determining a state of the captured digital check image.
15. A portable computing device, comprising: a processor;a memory; andwherein the processor is configured to: download an app for performing image processing on, and remotely depositing to an institution, a digital check image of a check, wherein the downloaded app comprises a first trained machine learning model;control, using the downloaded app, an image capture device associated with the portable computing device to capture the digital check image;input, using the downloaded app, the captured digital check image into the first trained machine learning model to identify which of a plurality of second trained machine learning models is a best match for handling an image processing task; andbased on the determined best match for handling the image processing task, select and execute a second trained machine learning model to modify the captured digital check image.
16. The portable computing device of claim 15, wherein the first trained machine learning model is trained to cause the processor to: recognize one of a specific check type or check design type of the captured digital check image; andselect one of the plurality of second trained machine learning models that is a best match for handling the image processing task based on the check type or check design type.
17. The portable computing device of claim 16, wherein the first trained machine learning model is further trained to cause the processor to: recognize at least one environmental factor associated with the captured digital check image, wherein the environmental factor comprises one of a lighting or shadow detection in the captured digital check image; andcause the processor to select the one of the plurality of second trained machine learning models based on the recognized environmental factor.
18. The portable computing device of claim 16, wherein the processor is configured to, when the second trained machine learning model determined as the best match for handling the image processing task is not stored in the memory on the portable computing device, download the second trained machine learning model from a remote computer.
19. The portable computing device of claim 15, wherein the first trained machine learning model is further configured to cause the processor to alter a device setting of the portable computing device for an capture operation based on a currently detected environmental condition.
20. The portable computing device of claim 15, wherein the first trained machine learning model is further configured to cause the processor to alter a default device setting of the portable computing device for a future image capture operation after a current image capture operation based on a currently detected environmental condition.

US Referenced Citations (1322)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
1748489	McCarthy et al.	Feb 1930	A
2292825	Dilks et al.	Aug 1942	A
3005282	Christiansen	Oct 1961	A
3341820	Grillmeier, Jr. et al.	Sep 1967	A
3576972	Wood	May 1971	A
3593913	Bremer	Jul 1971	A
3620553	Donovan	Nov 1971	A
3648242	Grosbard	Mar 1972	A
3800124	Walsh	Mar 1974	A
3816943	Henry	Jun 1974	A
4002356	Weidmann	Jan 1977	A
4027142	Paup et al.	May 1977	A
4060711	Buros	Nov 1977	A
4070649	Wright, Jr. et al.	Jan 1978	A
4128202	Buros	Dec 1978	A
4136471	Austin	Jan 1979	A
4205780	Burns	Jun 1980	A
4264808	Owens	Apr 1981	A
4305216	Skelton	Dec 1981	A
4321672	Braun	Mar 1982	A
4346442	Musmanno	Aug 1982	A
4417136	Rushby et al.	Nov 1983	A
4433436	Carnes	Feb 1984	A
4454610	Sziklai	Jun 1984	A
RE31692	Tyburski et al.	Oct 1984	E
4523330	Cain	Jun 1985	A
4636099	Goldston	Jan 1987	A
4640413	Kaplan	Feb 1987	A
4644144	Chandek	Feb 1987	A
4722444	Murphy et al.	Feb 1988	A
4722544	Weber	Feb 1988	A
4727435	Otani	Feb 1988	A
4737911	Freeman	Apr 1988	A
4739411	Bolton	Apr 1988	A
4774574	Daly et al.	Sep 1988	A
4774663	Musmanno	Sep 1988	A
4790475	Griffin	Dec 1988	A
4806780	Yamamoto	Feb 1989	A
4837693	Schotz	Jun 1989	A
4890228	Longfield	Dec 1989	A
4896363	Taylor et al.	Jan 1990	A
4927071	Wood	May 1990	A
4934587	McNabb	Jun 1990	A
4960981	Benton	Oct 1990	A
4975735	Bright	Dec 1990	A
5022683	Barbour	Jun 1991	A
5053607	Carlson	Oct 1991	A
5077805	Tan	Dec 1991	A
5091968	Higgins et al.	Feb 1992	A
5122950	Benton et al.	Jun 1992	A
5134564	Dunn et al.	Jul 1992	A
5146606	Grondalski	Sep 1992	A
5157620	Shaar	Oct 1992	A
5159548	Caslavka	Oct 1992	A
5164833	Aoki	Nov 1992	A
5175682	Higashiyama et al.	Dec 1992	A
5187750	Behera	Feb 1993	A
5191525	LeBrun	Mar 1993	A
5193121	Elischer et al.	Mar 1993	A
5220501	Lawlor	Jun 1993	A
5227863	Bilbrey et al.	Jul 1993	A
5229589	Schneider	Jul 1993	A
5233547	Kapp et al.	Aug 1993	A
5237158	Kern et al.	Aug 1993	A
5237159	Stephens	Aug 1993	A
5237620	Deaton et al.	Aug 1993	A
5257320	Etherington et al.	Oct 1993	A
5265008	Benton	Nov 1993	A
5268968	Yoshida	Dec 1993	A
5283829	Anderson	Feb 1994	A
5321816	Rogan	Jun 1994	A
5345090	Hludzinski	Sep 1994	A
5347302	Simonoff	Sep 1994	A
5350906	Brody	Sep 1994	A
5373550	Campbell	Dec 1994	A
5383113	Kight et al.	Jan 1995	A
5419588	Wood	May 1995	A
5422467	Graef	Jun 1995	A
5444616	Nair et al.	Aug 1995	A
5444794	Uhland, Sr.	Aug 1995	A
5455875	Chevion et al.	Oct 1995	A
5475403	Havlovick et al.	Dec 1995	A
5504538	Tsujihara	Apr 1996	A
5504677	Pollin	Apr 1996	A
5528387	Kelly et al.	Jun 1996	A
5530773	Thompson	Jun 1996	A
5577179	Blank	Nov 1996	A
5583759	Geer	Dec 1996	A
5590196	Moreau	Dec 1996	A
5594225	Botvin	Jan 1997	A
5598969	Ong	Feb 1997	A
5602936	Green	Feb 1997	A
5610726	Nonoshita	Mar 1997	A
5611028	Shibasaki	Mar 1997	A
5630073	Nolan	May 1997	A
5631984	Graf et al.	May 1997	A
5664027	Ittner	Sep 1997	A
5668897	Stolfo	Sep 1997	A
5673320	Ray et al.	Sep 1997	A
5677955	Doggett	Oct 1997	A
5678046	Cahill et al.	Oct 1997	A
5679938	Templeton	Oct 1997	A
5680611	Rail	Oct 1997	A
5691524	Josephson	Nov 1997	A
5699452	Vaidyanathan	Dec 1997	A
5734747	Vaidyanathan	Mar 1998	A
5737440	Kunkler	Apr 1998	A
5748780	Stolfo	May 1998	A
5751842	Riach	May 1998	A
5761686	Bloomberg	Jun 1998	A
5784503	Bleecker, III et al.	Jul 1998	A
5830609	Warner	Nov 1998	A
5832463	Funk	Nov 1998	A
5838814	Moore	Nov 1998	A
5848185	Koga et al.	Dec 1998	A
5859935	Johnson et al.	Jan 1999	A
5863075	Rich	Jan 1999	A
5870456	Rogers	Feb 1999	A
5870724	Lawlor	Feb 1999	A
5870725	Bellinger et al.	Feb 1999	A
5878337	Joao	Mar 1999	A
5889884	Hashimoto et al.	Mar 1999	A
5890141	Carney et al.	Mar 1999	A
5893101	Balogh et al.	Apr 1999	A
5897625	Gustin	Apr 1999	A
5898157	Mangili et al.	Apr 1999	A
5901253	Tretter	May 1999	A
5903878	Talati	May 1999	A
5903881	Schrader	May 1999	A
5903904	Peairs	May 1999	A
5910988	Ballard	Jun 1999	A
5917931	Kunkler	Jun 1999	A
5924737	Schrupp	Jul 1999	A
5926548	Okamoto	Jul 1999	A
5930501	Neil	Jul 1999	A
5930778	Geer	Jul 1999	A
5937396	Konya	Aug 1999	A
5940844	Cahill	Aug 1999	A
5982918	Mennie	Nov 1999	A
5987439	Gustin et al.	Nov 1999	A
6005623	Takahashi	Dec 1999	A
6012048	Gustin et al.	Jan 2000	A
6014454	Kunkler	Jan 2000	A
6021202	Anderson	Feb 2000	A
6021397	Jones	Feb 2000	A
6023705	Bellinger et al.	Feb 2000	A
6029887	Furuhashi	Feb 2000	A
6030000	Diamond	Feb 2000	A
6032137	Ballard	Feb 2000	A
6038553	Hyde	Mar 2000	A
6053405	Irwin, Jr. et al.	Apr 2000	A
6059185	Funk et al.	May 2000	A
6064753	Bolle et al.	May 2000	A
6064762	Haenel	May 2000	A
6072941	Suzuki et al.	Jun 2000	A
6073119	Borenmisza-Wahr	Jun 2000	A
6073121	Ramzy	Jun 2000	A
6085168	Mori	Jul 2000	A
6086708	Colgate	Jul 2000	A
6089450	Koeple	Jul 2000	A
6089610	Greene	Jul 2000	A
6092047	Hyman et al.	Jul 2000	A
6097834	Krouse	Aug 2000	A
6097845	Ng et al.	Aug 2000	A
6097885	Rayner	Aug 2000	A
6105865	Hardesty	Aug 2000	A
6128603	Dent et al.	Oct 2000	A
6141339	Kaplan et al.	Oct 2000	A
6145738	Stinson et al.	Nov 2000	A
6148102	Stolin	Nov 2000	A
6149056	Stinson et al.	Nov 2000	A
6151409	Chen et al.	Nov 2000	A
6151423	Melen	Nov 2000	A
6151426	Lee	Nov 2000	A
6159585	Rittenhouse	Dec 2000	A
6170744	Lee	Jan 2001	B1
6178270	Taylor et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6178409	Weber et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6181837	Cahill et al.	Jan 2001	B1
6188506	Kaiserman	Feb 2001	B1
6189785	Lowery	Feb 2001	B1
6192165	Irons	Feb 2001	B1
6195452	Royer	Feb 2001	B1
6195694	Chen et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6199055	Kara	Mar 2001	B1
6236009	Emigh et al.	May 2001	B1
6243689	Norton	Jun 2001	B1
6278983	Ball	Aug 2001	B1
6282523	Tedesco et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6282826	Richards	Sep 2001	B1
6289178	Kazami	Sep 2001	B1
6293469	Masson et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6304860	Martin	Oct 2001	B1
6310647	Parulski et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6314452	Dekel	Nov 2001	B1
6315195	Ramachandrun	Nov 2001	B1
6317727	May	Nov 2001	B1
6328207	Gregoire et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6330546	Gopinathan et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6339658	Moccagatta	Jan 2002	B1
6339766	Gephart	Jan 2002	B1
6351553	Hayosh	Feb 2002	B1
6351735	Deaton et al.	Feb 2002	B1
6354490	Weiss et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6363162	Moed et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6363164	Jones et al.	Mar 2002	B1
6390362	Martin	May 2002	B1
6397196	Kravetz	May 2002	B1
6408084	Foley	Jun 2002	B1
6411725	Rhoads	Jun 2002	B1
6411737	Wesolkowski et al.	Jun 2002	B2
6411938	Gates et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6413305	Mehta	Jul 2002	B1
6417869	Do	Jul 2002	B1
6425017	Dievendorff	Jul 2002	B1
6429952	Olbricht	Aug 2002	B1
6439454	Masson et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6449397	Che-Chu	Sep 2002	B1
6450403	Martens et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6463220	Dance et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6464134	Page	Oct 2002	B1
6469745	Yamada et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6470325	Leemhuis	Oct 2002	B1
6473519	Pidhirny et al.	Oct 2002	B1
6502747	Stoutenburg et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6505178	Flenley	Jan 2003	B1
6546119	Ciolli et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6564380	Murphy	May 2003	B1
6574377	Cahill et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6574609	Downs	Jun 2003	B1
6578760	Otto	Jun 2003	B1
6587837	Spagna	Jul 2003	B1
6606117	Windle	Aug 2003	B1
6609200	Anderson	Aug 2003	B2
6611598	Hayosh	Aug 2003	B1
6614930	Agnihotri et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6643416	Daniels	Nov 2003	B1
6647136	Jones et al.	Nov 2003	B2
6654487	Downs, Jr.	Nov 2003	B1
6661910	Jones et al.	Dec 2003	B2
6668372	Wu	Dec 2003	B1
6669086	Abdi et al.	Dec 2003	B2
6672452	Alves	Jan 2004	B1
6682452	Quintus	Jan 2004	B2
6695204	Stinson	Feb 2004	B1
6697091	Rzepkowski et al.	Feb 2004	B1
6704039	Pena	Mar 2004	B2
6711474	Treyz et al.	Mar 2004	B1
6726097	Graef	Apr 2004	B2
6728397	McNeal	Apr 2004	B2
6738087	Belkin et al.	May 2004	B2
6738496	Van Hall	May 2004	B1
6742128	Joiner	May 2004	B1
6745186	Testa et al.	Jun 2004	B1
6754640	Bozeman	Jun 2004	B2
6755340	Voss et al.	Jun 2004	B1
6760414	Schurko et al.	Jul 2004	B1
6760470	Bogosian et al.	Jul 2004	B1
6763226	McZeal	Jul 2004	B1
6781962	Williams	Aug 2004	B1
6786398	Stinson et al.	Sep 2004	B1
6789054	Makhlouf	Sep 2004	B1
6796489	Slater et al.	Sep 2004	B2
6796491	Nakajima	Sep 2004	B2
6806903	Okisu et al.	Oct 2004	B1
6807294	Yamazaki	Oct 2004	B2
6813733	Li	Nov 2004	B1
6829704	Zhang	Dec 2004	B2
6844885	Anderson	Jan 2005	B2
6856965	Stinson	Feb 2005	B1
6863214	Garner et al.	Mar 2005	B2
6870947	Kelland	Mar 2005	B2
6873728	Bernstein et al.	Mar 2005	B2
6883140	Acker	Apr 2005	B1
6898314	Kung et al.	May 2005	B2
6902105	Koakutsu	Jun 2005	B2
6910023	Schibi	Jun 2005	B1
6913188	Wong	Jul 2005	B2
6922487	Dance et al.	Jul 2005	B2
6930718	Parulski et al.	Aug 2005	B2
6931255	Mekuria	Aug 2005	B2
6931591	Brown	Aug 2005	B1
6934719	Nally	Aug 2005	B2
6044773	Abrahams	Sep 2005	A1
6944773	Abrahams	Sep 2005	B1
6947610	Sun	Sep 2005	B2
6957770	Robinson	Oct 2005	B1
6961689	Greenberg	Nov 2005	B1
6970843	Forte	Nov 2005	B1
6973589	Wright	Dec 2005	B2
6983886	Natsukari et al.	Jan 2006	B2
6993507	Meyer	Jan 2006	B2
6996263	Jones et al.	Feb 2006	B2
6999943	Johnson	Feb 2006	B1
7003040	Yi	Feb 2006	B2
7004382	Sandru	Feb 2006	B2
7010155	Koakutsu et al.	Mar 2006	B2
7010507	Anderson	Mar 2006	B1
7016704	Pallakoff	Mar 2006	B2
7027171	Watanabe	Apr 2006	B1
7028886	Maloney	Apr 2006	B1
7039048	Monta	May 2006	B1
7046991	Little	May 2006	B2
7051001	Slater	May 2006	B1
7058036	Yu	Jun 2006	B1
7062099	Li et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7062456	Riehl et al.	Jun 2006	B1
7062768	Kubo	Jun 2006	B2
7072862	Wilson	Jul 2006	B1
7076458	Lawlor et al.	Jul 2006	B2
7086003	Demsky	Aug 2006	B2
7092561	Downs, Jr.	Aug 2006	B2
7104443	Paul et al.	Sep 2006	B1
7113925	Waserstein	Sep 2006	B2
7114649	Nelson	Oct 2006	B2
7116446	Maurer	Oct 2006	B2
7117171	Pollin	Oct 2006	B1
7120461	Cho	Oct 2006	B2
7131571	Swift et al.	Nov 2006	B2
7139594	Nagatomo	Nov 2006	B2
7140539	Crews	Nov 2006	B1
7163347	Lugg	Jan 2007	B2
7178721	Maloney	Feb 2007	B2
7181430	Buchanan et al.	Feb 2007	B1
7184980	Allen-Rouman et al.	Feb 2007	B2
7185805	McShirley	Mar 2007	B1
7197173	Jones et al.	Mar 2007	B2
7200255	Jones	Apr 2007	B2
7204412	Foss, Jr.	Apr 2007	B2
7207478	Blackson et al.	Apr 2007	B1
7216106	Buchanan	May 2007	B1
7219082	Forte	May 2007	B2
7219831	Murata	May 2007	B2
7240336	Baker	Jul 2007	B1
7245765	Myers et al.	Jul 2007	B2
7249076	Pendleton	Jul 2007	B1
7252224	Verma	Aug 2007	B2
7257246	Brodie et al.	Aug 2007	B1
7266230	Doran	Sep 2007	B2
7277191	Metcalfe et al.	Oct 2007	B2
7290034	Budd	Oct 2007	B2
7296734	Pliha	Nov 2007	B2
7299970	Ching	Nov 2007	B1
7299979	Phillips	Nov 2007	B2
7313543	Crane	Dec 2007	B1
7314163	Crews et al.	Jan 2008	B1
7321874	Dilip	Jan 2008	B2
7321875	Dilip	Jan 2008	B2
7325725	Foss, Jr.	Feb 2008	B2
7328190	Smith et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7330604	Wu et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7331523	Meier et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7336813	Prakash et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7343320	Treyz	Mar 2008	B1
7349566	Jones et al.	Mar 2008	B2
7349585	Li	Mar 2008	B2
7350697	Swift et al.	Apr 2008	B2
7356505	March	Apr 2008	B2
7369713	Suino	May 2008	B2
7377425	Ma	May 2008	B1
7379978	Anderson	May 2008	B2
7383227	Weinflash et al.	Jun 2008	B2
7385631	Maeno	Jun 2008	B2
7386511	Buchanan	Jun 2008	B2
7388683	Rodriguez et al.	Jun 2008	B2
7389912	Starrs	Jun 2008	B2
7391897	Jones et al.	Jun 2008	B2
7391934	Goodall et al.	Jun 2008	B2
7392935	Byrne	Jul 2008	B2
7401048	Rosedale	Jul 2008	B2
7403917	Larsen	Jul 2008	B1
7406198	Aoki et al.	Jul 2008	B2
7419093	Blackson et al.	Sep 2008	B1
7421107	Lugg	Sep 2008	B2
7421410	Schechtman et al.	Sep 2008	B1
7427016	Chimento	Sep 2008	B2
7433098	Klein et al.	Oct 2008	B2
7437327	Lam	Oct 2008	B2
7440924	Buchanan	Oct 2008	B2
7447347	Weber	Nov 2008	B2
7455220	Phillips	Nov 2008	B2
7455221	Sheaffer	Nov 2008	B2
7460108	Tamura	Dec 2008	B2
7460700	Tsunachima et al.	Dec 2008	B2
7461779	Ramachandran	Dec 2008	B2
7461780	Potts	Dec 2008	B2
7464859	Hawkins	Dec 2008	B1
7471818	Price	Dec 2008	B1
7475040	Buchanan	Jan 2009	B2
7477923	Wallmark	Jan 2009	B2
7480382	Dunbar	Jan 2009	B2
7480422	Ackley et al.	Jan 2009	B2
7489953	Griffin	Feb 2009	B2
7490242	Torres	Feb 2009	B2
7497429	Reynders	Mar 2009	B2
7503486	Ahles	Mar 2009	B2
7505759	Rahman	Mar 2009	B1
7506261	Statou	Mar 2009	B2
7509287	Nutahara	Mar 2009	B2
7512564	Geer	Mar 2009	B1
7519560	Lam	Apr 2009	B2
7520420	Phillips	Apr 2009	B2
7520422	Robinson et al.	Apr 2009	B1
7536354	deGroeve et al.	May 2009	B1
7536440	Budd	May 2009	B2
7539646	Gilder	May 2009	B2
7540408	Levine	Jun 2009	B2
7542598	Jones	Jun 2009	B2
7545529	Borrey et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7548641	Gilson et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7566002	Love et al.	Jul 2009	B2
7568615	Corona et al.	Aug 2009	B2
7571848	Cohen	Aug 2009	B2
7577614	Warren et al.	Aug 2009	B1
7587066	Cordery et al.	Sep 2009	B2
7587363	Cataline	Sep 2009	B2
7590275	Clarke et al.	Sep 2009	B2
7599543	Jones	Oct 2009	B2
7599888	Manfre	Oct 2009	B2
7602956	Jones	Oct 2009	B2
7606762	Heit	Oct 2009	B1
7609873	Foth et al.	Oct 2009	B2
7609889	Guo et al.	Oct 2009	B2
7619721	Jones	Nov 2009	B2
7620231	Jones	Nov 2009	B2
7620604	Bueche, Jr.	Nov 2009	B1
7630518	Frew et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7644037	Ostrovsky	Jan 2010	B1
7644043	Minowa	Jan 2010	B2
7647275	Jones	Jan 2010	B2
7647897	Jones	Jan 2010	B2
7668363	Price	Feb 2010	B2
7672022	Fan	Mar 2010	B1
7672940	Viola	Mar 2010	B2
7676409	Ahmad	Mar 2010	B1
7680732	Davies et al.	Mar 2010	B1
7680735	Loy	Mar 2010	B1
7689482	Lam	Mar 2010	B2
7697776	Wu et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7698222	Bueche, Jr.	Apr 2010	B1
7702588	Gilder et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7714778	Dupray	May 2010	B2
7720735	Anderson et al.	May 2010	B2
7734545	Fogliano	Jun 2010	B1
7743979	Fredman	Jun 2010	B2
7753268	Robinson et al.	Jul 2010	B1
7761358	Craig et al.	Jul 2010	B2
7766223	Mello	Aug 2010	B1
7766244	Field	Aug 2010	B1
7769650	Bleunven	Aug 2010	B2
7778457	Nepomniachtchi et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7792752	Kay	Sep 2010	B1
7792753	Slater et al.	Sep 2010	B1
7793833	Yoon et al.	Sep 2010	B2
7810714	Murata	Oct 2010	B2
7812986	Graham et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7818245	Prakash et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7831458	Neumann	Nov 2010	B2
7856402	Kay	Dec 2010	B1
7865384	Anderson et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7865425	Waelbroeck	Jan 2011	B2
7873200	Oakes, III et al.	Jan 2011	B1
7873556	Dolan	Jan 2011	B1
7876949	Oakes, III et al.	Jan 2011	B1
7885451	Walls et al.	Feb 2011	B1
7885880	Prasad et al.	Feb 2011	B1
7894094	Nacman et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7895054	Slen et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7896232	Prasad et al.	Mar 2011	B1
7900822	Prasad et al.	Mar 2011	B1
7903863	Jones et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7904386	Kalra et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7912785	Kay	Mar 2011	B1
7935441	Tononishi	May 2011	B2
7949587	Morris et al.	May 2011	B1
7950698	Popadic et al.	May 2011	B2
7953441	Lors	May 2011	B2
7958053	Stone	Jun 2011	B2
7962411	Prasad et al.	Jun 2011	B1
7970677	Oakes, III et al.	Jun 2011	B1
7974869	Sharma	Jul 2011	B1
7974899	Prasad et al.	Jul 2011	B1
7978900	Nepomniachtchi et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7979326	Kurushima	Jul 2011	B2
7987231	Karkanias	Jul 2011	B2
7996312	Beck et al.	Aug 2011	B1
7996314	Smith et al.	Aug 2011	B1
7996315	Smith et al.	Aug 2011	B1
7996316	Smith et al.	Aug 2011	B1
8000514	Nepomniachtchi et al.	Aug 2011	B2
8001051	Smith et al.	Aug 2011	B1
8009931	Li	Aug 2011	B2
8045784	Price et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8046301	Smith et al.	Oct 2011	B1
8051453	Arseneau et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8060442	Hecht et al.	Nov 2011	B1
8064729	Li	Nov 2011	B2
8065307	Haslam et al.	Nov 2011	B2
8091778	Block et al.	Jan 2012	B1
8106956	Nikkanen	Jan 2012	B2
8116533	Kiplinger et al.	Feb 2012	B2
8118654	Nicolas	Feb 2012	B1
8131636	Viera et al.	Mar 2012	B1
8159520	Dhanoa	Apr 2012	B1
8203640	Kim et al.	Jun 2012	B2
8204293	Csulits et al.	Jun 2012	B2
8235284	Prasad et al.	Aug 2012	B1
8266076	Lopez et al.	Sep 2012	B2
8271385	Emerson et al.	Sep 2012	B2
8290237	Burks et al.	Oct 2012	B1
8313020	Ramachandran	Nov 2012	B2
8320657	Burks et al.	Nov 2012	B1
8332329	Thiele	Dec 2012	B1
8341077	Nichols et al.	Dec 2012	B1
8351677	Oakes, III et al.	Jan 2013	B1
8351678	Medina, III	Jan 2013	B1
8358826	Medina et al.	Jan 2013	B1
8364563	Choiniere, Sr.	Jan 2013	B2
8369650	Zamfir et al.	Feb 2013	B2
8374963	Billman	Feb 2013	B1
8391599	Medina, III	Mar 2013	B1
8392332	Oakes et al.	Mar 2013	B1
8396623	Maeda et al.	Mar 2013	B2
8401962	Bent et al.	Mar 2013	B1
8422758	Bueche, Jr.	Apr 2013	B1
8433127	Harpel et al.	Apr 2013	B1
8433647	Yarbrough	Apr 2013	B1
8452689	Medina, III	May 2013	B1
RE44274	Popadic et al.	Jun 2013	E
8464933	Prasad et al.	Jun 2013	B1
8483473	Roach	Jul 2013	B2
8531518	Zomet	Sep 2013	B1
8538124	Harpel et al.	Sep 2013	B1
8542921	Medina	Sep 2013	B1
8548267	Yacoub et al.	Oct 2013	B1
8559766	Tilt et al.	Oct 2013	B2
8582862	Nepomniachtchi et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8611635	Medina, III	Dec 2013	B1
8660952	Viera et al.	Feb 2014	B1
8688579	Ethington et al.	Apr 2014	B1
8699779	Prasad et al.	Apr 2014	B1
8708227	Oakes, III et al.	Apr 2014	B1
8731321	Fujiwara et al.	May 2014	B2
8732081	Oakes, III et al.	May 2014	B1
8751345	Borzych et al.	Jun 2014	B1
8751356	Garcia	Jun 2014	B1
8751379	Bueche, Jr.	Jun 2014	B1
8768038	Sherman et al.	Jul 2014	B1
8768836	Acharya	Jul 2014	B1
8799147	Walls et al.	Aug 2014	B1
8818033	Liu	Aug 2014	B1
8824772	Viera	Sep 2014	B2
8837806	Ethington et al.	Sep 2014	B1
8843405	Hartman et al.	Sep 2014	B1
8929640	Mennie et al.	Jan 2015	B1
8959033	Oakes, III et al.	Feb 2015	B1
8977571	Bueche, Jr. et al.	Mar 2015	B1
8990862	Smith	Mar 2015	B1
9009071	Watson et al.	Apr 2015	B1
9036040	Danko	May 2015	B1
9058512	Medina, III	Jun 2015	B1
9064284	Janiszeski et al.	Jun 2015	B1
9129340	Medina, III et al.	Sep 2015	B1
9159101	Pollack et al.	Oct 2015	B1
9177197	Prasad et al.	Nov 2015	B1
9177198	Prasad et al.	Nov 2015	B1
9195986	Christy et al.	Nov 2015	B2
9224136	Oakes, III et al.	Dec 2015	B1
9235860	Boucher et al.	Jan 2016	B1
9270804	Dees et al.	Feb 2016	B2
9286514	Newman	Mar 2016	B1
9311634	Hildebrand	Apr 2016	B1
9336517	Prasad et al.	May 2016	B1
9384409	Ming	Jul 2016	B1
9387813	Moeller et al.	Jul 2016	B1
9390339	Danko	Jul 2016	B1
9401011	Medina, III et al.	Jul 2016	B2
9424569	Sherman et al.	Aug 2016	B1
9524269	Brinkmann et al.	Dec 2016	B1
9569756	Bueche, Jr. et al.	Feb 2017	B1
9613467	Roberts et al.	Apr 2017	B2
9613469	Fish et al.	Apr 2017	B2
9619872	Medina, III et al.	Apr 2017	B1
9626183	Smith et al.	Apr 2017	B1
9626662	Prasad et al.	Apr 2017	B1
9779392	Prasad et al.	Oct 2017	B1
9779452	Medina et al.	Oct 2017	B1
9785929	Watson et al.	Oct 2017	B1
9792654	Limas et al.	Oct 2017	B1
9818090	Bueche, Jr. et al.	Nov 2017	B1
9824453	Collins	Nov 2017	B1
9886642	Danko	Feb 2018	B1
9892454	Pollack et al.	Feb 2018	B1
9898778	Pollack et al.	Feb 2018	B1
9898808	Medina, III et al.	Feb 2018	B1
9904848	Newman	Feb 2018	B1
9946923	Medina	Apr 2018	B1
10013605	Oakes, III et al.	Jul 2018	B1
10013681	Oakes, III et al.	Jul 2018	B1
10157326	Long et al.	Dec 2018	B2
10181087	Danko	Jan 2019	B1
10210767	Johansen	Feb 2019	B2
10217375	Waldron	Feb 2019	B2
10235660	Bueche, Jr. et al.	Mar 2019	B1
10325420	Moon	Jun 2019	B1
10354235	Medina	Jul 2019	B1
10360448	Newman	Jul 2019	B1
10373136	Pollack et al.	Aug 2019	B1
10380559	Oakes, III et al.	Aug 2019	B1
10380562	Prasad et al.	Aug 2019	B1
10380565	Prasad	Aug 2019	B1
10380683	Voutour et al.	Aug 2019	B1
10380993	Clauer Salyers	Aug 2019	B1
10402638	Oakes, III et al.	Sep 2019	B1
10402790	Clark et al.	Sep 2019	B1
10402944	Pribble et al.	Sep 2019	B1
10460295	Oakes, III et al.	Oct 2019	B1
10460381	Pollack et al.	Oct 2019	B1
10482432	Oakes, III et al.	Nov 2019	B1
10504185	Buentello	Dec 2019	B1
10521781	Singfield	Dec 2019	B1
10552810	Ethington et al.	Feb 2020	B1
10574879	Prasad et al.	Feb 2020	B1
10621559	Oakes, III et al.	Apr 2020	B1
10621660	Medina et al.	Apr 2020	B1
10706466	Ethington et al.	Jul 2020	B1
10713629	Medina, III	Jul 2020	B1
10719815	Oakes, III et al.	Jul 2020	B1
10769598	Oakes, III et al.	Sep 2020	B1
10769603	Prasad	Sep 2020	B1
10810561	Pollack et al.	Oct 2020	B1
10818282	Clauer Salyers	Oct 2020	B1
10839358	Prasad et al.	Nov 2020	B1
10846667	Hecht	Nov 2020	B1
10848665	Prasad et al.	Nov 2020	B1
10855914	Prasad et al.	Dec 2020	B1
10896408	Prasad et al.	Jan 2021	B1
10915879	Pollack et al.	Feb 2021	B1
10956728	Voutour	Mar 2021	B1
10956879	Eidson et al.	Mar 2021	B1
11030752	Backlund	Jun 2021	B1
11042940	Limas	Jun 2021	B1
11042941	Limas	Jun 2021	B1
11062130	Medina, III	Jul 2021	B1
11062131	Medina, III	Jul 2021	B1
11062283	Prasad	Jul 2021	B1
11064111	Prasad	Jul 2021	B1
11068976	Voutour	Jul 2021	B1
11070868	Mortensen	Jul 2021	B1
11121989	Castinado	Sep 2021	B1
11182753	Oakes, III et al.	Nov 2021	B1
11222315	Prasad et al.	Jan 2022	B1
11232517	Medina et al.	Jan 2022	B1
11250398	Prasad et al.	Feb 2022	B1
11288898	Moon	Mar 2022	B1
11328267	Medina, III	May 2022	B1
20010004235	Maloney	Jun 2001	A1
20010014881	Drummond	Aug 2001	A1
20010016084	Pollard et al.	Aug 2001	A1
20010018739	Anderson	Aug 2001	A1
20010020949	Gong et al.	Sep 2001	A1
20010027994	Hayashida	Oct 2001	A1
20010030695	Prabhu et al.	Oct 2001	A1
20010037299	Nichols et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20010042171	Vermeulen	Nov 2001	A1
20010042785	Walker	Nov 2001	A1
20010043748	Wesolkowski et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20010047330	Gephart	Nov 2001	A1
20010051965	Guillevic	Dec 2001	A1
20010054020	Barth et al.	Dec 2001	A1
20020001393	Jones	Jan 2002	A1
20020013767	Katz	Jan 2002	A1
20020016763	March	Feb 2002	A1
20020016769	Barbara et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020023055	Antognini et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020025085	Gustafson et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020026418	Koppel et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020032656	Chen	Mar 2002	A1
20020038289	Lawlor et al.	Mar 2002	A1
20020040340	Yoshida	Apr 2002	A1
20020052841	Guthrie	May 2002	A1
20020052853	Munoz	May 2002	A1
20020065786	Martens et al.	May 2002	A1
20020072974	Pugliese	Jun 2002	A1
20020075380	Seeger et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020075524	Blair	Jun 2002	A1
20020084321	Martens	Jul 2002	A1
20020087467	Mascavage, III et al.	Jul 2002	A1
20020107767	McClair et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020107809	Biddle et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020116329	Serbetcioglu	Aug 2002	A1
20020116335	Star	Aug 2002	A1
20020118891	Rudd	Aug 2002	A1
20020120562	Opiela	Aug 2002	A1
20020120582	Elston et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020120846	Stewart et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020129249	Maillard et al.	Sep 2002	A1
20020130868	Smith	Sep 2002	A1
20020133409	Sawano et al.	Sep 2002	A1
20020138445	Laage	Sep 2002	A1
20020138522	Muralidhar	Sep 2002	A1
20020145035	Jones	Oct 2002	A1
20020147798	Huang	Oct 2002	A1
20020150279	Scott	Oct 2002	A1
20020150311	Lynn	Oct 2002	A1
20020152160	Allen-Rouman et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020152161	Aoike	Oct 2002	A1
20020152164	Dutta	Oct 2002	A1
20020152165	Dutta et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020152169	Dutta et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020152170	Dutta et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020153414	Stoutenburg et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020154127	Vienneau et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020154815	Mizutani	Oct 2002	A1
20020159648	Alderson et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020169715	Ruth et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020171820	Okamura	Nov 2002	A1
20020172516	Aoyama	Nov 2002	A1
20020178112	Goeller	Nov 2002	A1
20020186881	Li	Dec 2002	A1
20020188564	Star	Dec 2002	A1
20020195485	Pomerleau et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20030005326	Flemming	Jan 2003	A1
20030009420	Jones	Jan 2003	A1
20030015583	Abdi et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030018897	Bellis, Jr. et al.	Jan 2003	A1
20030023557	Moore	Jan 2003	A1
20030026609	Parulski	Feb 2003	A1
20030038227	Sesek	Feb 2003	A1
20030046223	Crawford	Mar 2003	A1
20030050889	Burke	Mar 2003	A1
20030051138	Maeda et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030053692	Hong et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030055756	Allan	Mar 2003	A1
20030055776	Samuelson	Mar 2003	A1
20030072568	Lin et al.	Apr 2003	A1
20030074315	Lam	Apr 2003	A1
20030075596	Koakutsu	Apr 2003	A1
20030075916	Gorski	Apr 2003	A1
20030078883	Stewart et al.	Apr 2003	A1
20030081121	Swan	May 2003	A1
20030081824	Mennie	May 2003	A1
20030086615	Dance et al.	May 2003	A1
20030093367	Allen-Rouman et al.	May 2003	A1
20030093369	Ijichi et al.	May 2003	A1
20030097592	Adusumilli	May 2003	A1
20030102714	Rhodes et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030105688	Brown et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030105714	Alarcon-Luther et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030119478	Nagy et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030126078	Vihinen	Jul 2003	A1
20030126082	Omura et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030130940	Hansen et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030130958	Narayanan et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030132384	Sugiyama et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030133608	Bernstein et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030133610	Nagarajan et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030135457	Stewart et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030139999	Rowe	Jul 2003	A1
20030159046	Choi et al.	Aug 2003	A1
20030167225	Adams	Sep 2003	A1
20030177448	Levine et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030187790	Swift et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030191615	Bailey	Oct 2003	A1
20030191869	Williams	Oct 2003	A1
20030200107	Allen et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030200174	Star	Oct 2003	A1
20030202690	Jones et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030212904	Randle et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030213841	Josephson et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030217005	Drummond et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030218061	Filatov	Nov 2003	A1
20030225705	Park et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030231285	Ferguson	Dec 2003	A1
20030233278	Marshall	Dec 2003	A1
20030233318	King et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040010466	Anderson	Jan 2004	A1
20040010803	Berstis	Jan 2004	A1
20040012496	De Souza	Jan 2004	A1
20040012679	Fan	Jan 2004	A1
20040013284	Yu	Jan 2004	A1
20040017482	Weitman	Jan 2004	A1
20040024626	Bruijning	Feb 2004	A1
20040024708	Masuda	Feb 2004	A1
20040029591	Chapman et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040030741	Wolton et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040044606	Buttridge et al.	Mar 2004	A1
20040057697	Renzi	Mar 2004	A1
20040058705	Morgan	Mar 2004	A1
20040061913	Takiguchi	Apr 2004	A1
20040066031	Wong	Apr 2004	A1
20040066419	Pyhalammi	Apr 2004	A1
20040069841	Wong	Apr 2004	A1
20040071333	Douglas et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040075754	Nakajima et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040076320	Downs, Jr.	Apr 2004	A1
20040078299	Down-Logan	Apr 2004	A1
20040080795	Bean et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040089711	Sandru	May 2004	A1
20040093303	Picciallo	May 2004	A1
20040093305	Kight	May 2004	A1
20040103057	Melbert et al.	May 2004	A1
20040103296	Harp	May 2004	A1
20040109596	Doran	Jun 2004	A1
20040110975	Osinski et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040111371	Friedman	Jun 2004	A1
20040117302	Weichert	Jun 2004	A1
20040122754	Stevens	Jun 2004	A1
20040133511	Smith et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040133516	Buchanan et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040136586	Okamura	Jul 2004	A1
20040138974	Shimamura	Jul 2004	A1
20040148235	Craig et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040158549	Matena	Aug 2004	A1
20040165096	Maeno	Aug 2004	A1
20040170259	Park	Sep 2004	A1
20040171371	Paul	Sep 2004	A1
20040184766	Kim et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040193878	Dillinger et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040201695	Inasaka	Oct 2004	A1
20040201741	Ban	Oct 2004	A1
20040202349	Erol et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040205459	Green	Oct 2004	A1
20040210515	Hughes	Oct 2004	A1
20040210523	Gains et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040217170	Takiguchi et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040225604	Foss, Jr. et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040228277	Williams	Nov 2004	A1
20040236647	Acharya	Nov 2004	A1
20040236688	Bozeman	Nov 2004	A1
20040238619	Nagasaka et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040240722	Tsuji et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040245324	Chen	Dec 2004	A1
20040247199	Murai et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040248600	Kim	Dec 2004	A1
20040252679	Williams	Dec 2004	A1
20040260636	Marceau	Dec 2004	A1
20040267665	Nam et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040267666	Minami	Dec 2004	A1
20050001421	Luth et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050001924	Honda	Jan 2005	A1
20050010108	Rahn et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050015332	Chen	Jan 2005	A1
20050015341	Jackson	Jan 2005	A1
20050015342	Murata	Jan 2005	A1
20050021466	Buchanan et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050030388	Stavely et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050033645	Duphily	Feb 2005	A1
20050033685	Reyes	Feb 2005	A1
20050033690	Antognini et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050033695	Minowa	Feb 2005	A1
20050034046	Berkmann	Feb 2005	A1
20050035193	Gustin et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050038746	Latimer et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050038754	Geist	Feb 2005	A1
20050044042	Mendiola	Feb 2005	A1
20050044577	Jerding	Feb 2005	A1
20050049950	Johnson	Mar 2005	A1
20050071283	Randle et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050075969	Nielson et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050075974	Turgeon	Apr 2005	A1
20050077351	De Jong	Apr 2005	A1
20050078192	Sakurai	Apr 2005	A1
20050078336	Ferlitsch	Apr 2005	A1
20050080725	Pick	Apr 2005	A1
20050082364	Alvarez et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050086140	Ireland	Apr 2005	A1
20050086168	Alvarez	Apr 2005	A1
20050089209	Stefanuk	Apr 2005	A1
20050091161	Gustin	Apr 2005	A1
20050096992	Geisel	May 2005	A1
20050097019	Jacobs	May 2005	A1
20050097046	Singfield	May 2005	A1
20050097050	Orcutt	May 2005	A1
20050100216	Myers et al.	May 2005	A1
20050102208	Gudgeon	May 2005	A1
20050108164	Salafia	May 2005	A1
20050108168	Halpin	May 2005	A1
20050115110	Dinkins	Jun 2005	A1
20050125338	Tidwell et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050125360	Tidwell et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050127160	Fujikawa	Jun 2005	A1
20050128333	Park	Jun 2005	A1
20050131820	Rodriguez	Jun 2005	A1
20050133586	Rekeweg et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050143136	Lev et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050144131	Aziz	Jun 2005	A1
20050149436	Elterich	Jul 2005	A1
20050157174	Kitamura et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20050165641	Chu	Jul 2005	A1
20050168566	Tada	Aug 2005	A1
20050171899	Dunn	Aug 2005	A1
20050171907	Lewis	Aug 2005	A1
20050177494	Kelly et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050177499	Thomas	Aug 2005	A1
20050177510	Hilt et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050177518	Brown	Aug 2005	A1
20050182710	Andersson et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050188306	Mackenzie	Aug 2005	A1
20050190269	Grignani	Sep 2005	A1
20050198364	David del Val et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050203430	Williams et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050205660	Munte	Sep 2005	A1
20050205661	Taylor	Sep 2005	A1
20050209961	Michelsen	Sep 2005	A1
20050213805	Blake et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050216409	McMonagle et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050216410	Davis et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050218209	Heilper et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050220324	Klein et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050228733	Bent et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050238257	Kaneda et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050244035	Klein et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050252955	Sugai	Nov 2005	A1
20050267843	Acharya et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050268107	Harris et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050269412	Chiu	Dec 2005	A1
20050273368	Hutten et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050273430	Pliha	Dec 2005	A1
20050278250	Zair	Dec 2005	A1
20050281448	Lugg	Dec 2005	A1
20050281450	Richardson	Dec 2005	A1
20050281471	LeComte	Dec 2005	A1
20050281474	Huang	Dec 2005	A1
20050289030	Smith	Dec 2005	A1
20050289059	Brewington et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050289182	Pandian et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060002426	Madour	Jan 2006	A1
20060004660	Pranger	Jan 2006	A1
20060015450	Guck et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060015733	O'Malley et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060017752	Kurzweil et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060025697	Kurzweil	Feb 2006	A1
20060026140	King	Feb 2006	A1
20060039628	Li et al.	Feb 2006	A1
20060039629	Li et al.	Feb 2006	A1
20060041506	Mason et al.	Feb 2006	A1
20060171697	Nijima	Feb 2006	A1
20060004537	Kim et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060045321	Yu	Mar 2006	A1
20060045379	Heaney, Jr. et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060047593	Naratil	Mar 2006	A1
20060049242	Mejias et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060053056	Alspach-Goss	Mar 2006	A1
20060059085	Tucker	Mar 2006	A1
20060064368	Forte	Mar 2006	A1
20060071950	Kurzweil et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060077941	Alagappan et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060080245	Bahl	Apr 2006	A1
20060085357	Pizarro	Apr 2006	A1
20060085516	Farr et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060102704	Reynders	May 2006	A1
20060103893	Azimi et al.	May 2006	A1
20060106691	Sheaffer	May 2006	A1
20060106717	Randle	May 2006	A1
20060108168	Fischer et al.	May 2006	A1
20060110063	Weiss	May 2006	A1
20060112013	Maloney	May 2006	A1
20060115110	Rodriguez	Jun 2006	A1
20060115141	Koakutsu et al.	Jun 2006	A1
20060118613	McMann	Jun 2006	A1
20060124728	Kotovich et al.	Jun 2006	A1
20060124730	Maloney	Jun 2006	A1
20060144924	Stover	Jul 2006	A1
20060144937	Heilper et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060144950	Johnson	Jul 2006	A1
20060152576	Kiessling et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060159367	Zeineh et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060161499	Rich et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060161501	Waserstein	Jul 2006	A1
20060164682	Lev	Jul 2006	A1
20060166178	Driedijk	Jul 2006	A1
20060167818	Wentker et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060181614	Yen et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060182331	Gilson et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060182332	Weber	Aug 2006	A1
20060186194	Richardson et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060202014	VanKirk et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060206506	Fitzpatrick	Sep 2006	A1
20060208059	Cable et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060210138	Hilton et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060210192	Orhun	Sep 2006	A1
20060212391	Norman et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060212393	Brown	Sep 2006	A1
20060214940	Kinoshita	Sep 2006	A1
20060215204	Miyamoto et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060215230	Borrey et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060221198	Fry et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060221415	Kawamoto	Oct 2006	A1
20060222260	Sambongi et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060229976	Jung	Oct 2006	A1
20060229986	Corder	Oct 2006	A1
20060229987	Leekley	Oct 2006	A1
20060238503	Smith	Oct 2006	A1
20060242062	Peterson	Oct 2006	A1
20060242063	Peterson	Oct 2006	A1
20060248009	Hicks et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060249567	Byrne	Nov 2006	A1
20060255124	Hoch	Nov 2006	A1
20060270421	Phillips	Nov 2006	A1
20060273165	Swift et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20060274164	Kimura et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20060279628	Fleming	Dec 2006	A1
20060282383	Doran	Dec 2006	A1
20060289630	Updike et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20060291744	Ikeda et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20070002157	Shintani et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070005467	Haigh et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070013721	Vau et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070016796	Singhal	Jan 2007	A1
20070019243	Sato	Jan 2007	A1
20070022053	Waserstein	Jan 2007	A1
20070027802	VanDeburg et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070030357	Levien et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070030363	Cheatle et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070031022	Frew	Feb 2007	A1
20070038561	Vancini et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070041629	Prakash et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070050292	Yarbrough	Mar 2007	A1
20070053574	Verma et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070058851	Quine	Mar 2007	A1
20070058874	Sunao et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070063016	Myatt	Mar 2007	A1
20070064991	Douglas et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070065143	Didow et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070075772	Kokubo	Apr 2007	A1
20070076940	Goodall et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070076941	Carreon et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070077921	Hayashi	Apr 2007	A1
20070080207	Williams	Apr 2007	A1
20070082700	Landschaft	Apr 2007	A1
20070084911	Crowell	Apr 2007	A1
20070086642	Foth	Apr 2007	A1
20070086643	Spier	Apr 2007	A1
20070094088	Mastie	Apr 2007	A1
20070094140	Riney et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070100748	Dheer	May 2007	A1
20070110277	Hayduchok et al.	May 2007	A1
20070116364	Kleihorst et al.	May 2007	A1
20070118472	Allen-Rouman et al.	May 2007	A1
20070118747	Pintsov et al.	May 2007	A1
20070122024	Haas et al.	May 2007	A1
20070124241	Newton	May 2007	A1
20070127805	Foth et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070129955	Dalmia	Jun 2007	A1
20070130063	Jindia	Jun 2007	A1
20070131758	Mejias et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070136078	Plante	Jun 2007	A1
20070136198	Foth et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070138255	Carreon et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070140545	Rossignoli	Jun 2007	A1
20070140594	Franklin	Jun 2007	A1
20070143208	Varga	Jun 2007	A1
20070150337	Hawkins et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070154098	Geva et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070156438	Popadic et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070168265	Rosenberger	Jul 2007	A1
20070168283	Alvarez et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070171288	Inoue	Jul 2007	A1
20070172107	Jones et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070172148	Hawley	Jul 2007	A1
20070175977	Bauer et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070179883	Questembert	Aug 2007	A1
20070183000	Eisen et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070183652	Backstrom et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070183741	Lerman et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070194102	Cohen	Aug 2007	A1
20070198432	Pitroda et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070203708	Polyon et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070206877	Wu et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070208816	Baldwin et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070214086	Homoki	Sep 2007	A1
20070217669	Swift et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070233525	Boyle	Oct 2007	A1
20070233585	Simon et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070235518	Mueller et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070235520	Smith et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070241179	Davis	Oct 2007	A1
20070244782	Chimento	Oct 2007	A1
20070244811	Tumminaro	Oct 2007	A1
20070246525	Smith et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070251992	Sharma et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070255652	Tumminaro	Nov 2007	A1
20070255653	Tumminaro	Nov 2007	A1
20070255662	Tumminaro	Nov 2007	A1
20070258634	Simonoff	Nov 2007	A1
20070262137	Brown	Nov 2007	A1
20070262148	Yoon	Nov 2007	A1
20070268540	Gaspardo et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070271182	Prakash et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070278286	Crowell et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070288380	Starrs	Dec 2007	A1
20070288382	Narayanan et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070295803	Levine et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070299928	Kohli et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080002911	Eisen	Jan 2008	A1
20080010204	Rackley III et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080013831	Aoki	Jan 2008	A1
20080021802	Pendelton	Jan 2008	A1
20080040280	Davis et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080046362	Easterly	Feb 2008	A1
20080052182	Marshall	Feb 2008	A1
20080059376	Davis	Mar 2008	A1
20080062437	Rizzo	Mar 2008	A1
20080063253	Wood	Mar 2008	A1
20080065524	Matthews et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080068674	McIntyre	Mar 2008	A1
20080069427	Liu	Mar 2008	A1
20080071679	Foley	Mar 2008	A1
20080071721	Wang	Mar 2008	A1
20080073423	Heit et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080080760	Ronca	Apr 2008	A1
20080086420	Gilder et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080086421	Gilder	Apr 2008	A1
20080086770	Kulkarni et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080091599	Foss, Jr.	Apr 2008	A1
20080097899	Jackson et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080097907	Till et al.	Apr 2008	A1
20080103790	Abernethy	May 2008	A1
20080103967	Ackert et al.	May 2008	A1
20080113674	Baig	May 2008	A1
20080114739	Hayes	May 2008	A1
20080115066	Pavley et al.	May 2008	A1
20080116257	Fickling	May 2008	A1
20080117991	Peddireddy	May 2008	A1
20080119178	Peddireddy	May 2008	A1
20080133411	Jones et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080140552	Blaikie	Jun 2008	A1
20080140579	Sanjiv	Jun 2008	A1
20080147549	Rathbun et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080155672	v	Jun 2008	A1
20080156438	Stumphauzer et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080162319	Breeden et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080162320	Mueller et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080162350	Allen-Rouman et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080162371	Rampell et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080177659	Lacey et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080180750	Feldman	Jul 2008	A1
20080192129	Walker	Aug 2008	A1
20080205751	Mischler	Aug 2008	A1
20080208727	McLaughlin et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080214180	Cunningham et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080219543	Csulits	Sep 2008	A1
20080245869	Berkun et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080247629	Gilder	Oct 2008	A1
20080247655	Yano	Oct 2008	A1
20080249931	Gilder et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080249951	Gilder et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080250196	Mori	Oct 2008	A1
20080262950	Christensen et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080262953	Anderson	Oct 2008	A1
20080275821	Bishop et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20080301441	Calman et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20080304769	Hollander et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20080316542	Mindrum et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20090024520	Drory et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090046938	Yoder	Feb 2009	A1
20090060396	Blessan et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090066987	Inokuchi	Mar 2009	A1
20090076921	Nelson et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090092309	Calman et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090094148	Gilder et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090108080	Meyer	Apr 2009	A1
20090110281	Hirabayashi	Apr 2009	A1
20090114716	Ramachandran	May 2009	A1
20090132813	Schibuk	May 2009	A1
20090141962	Borgia et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090164350	Sorbe et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090164370	Sorbe et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090166406	Pigg et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090167870	Caleca et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090171723	Jenkins	Jul 2009	A1
20090171795	Clouthier et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090171819	Emde et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090171825	Roman	Jul 2009	A1
20090173781	Ramachadran	Jul 2009	A1
20090176511	Morrison	Jul 2009	A1
20090185241	Nepomniachtchi	Jul 2009	A1
20090185737	Nepomniachtchi	Jul 2009	A1
20090185738	Nepomniachtchi	Jul 2009	A1
20090190823	Walters	Jul 2009	A1
20090192938	Amos	Jul 2009	A1
20090212929	Drory et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090222347	Whitten	Sep 2009	A1
20090236413	Mueller et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090240574	Carpenter	Sep 2009	A1
20090240620	Kendrick et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090252437	Li	Oct 2009	A1
20090254447	Blades	Oct 2009	A1
20090257641	Liu et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090263019	Tzadok et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090271287	Halpern	Oct 2009	A1
20090281904	Pharris	Nov 2009	A1
20090284637	Parulski et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090290751	Ferman et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090292628	Dryer et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090313167	Dujari et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090319425	Tumminaro et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090327129	Collas et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20100007899	Lay	Jan 2010	A1
20100008579	Smimov	Jan 2010	A1
20100016016	Brundage et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100027679	Sunahara et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100030687	Panthaki et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100038839	DeWitt et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100047000	Park et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100057578	Blair et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100061446	Hands et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100069093	Morrison	Mar 2010	A1
20100069155	Schwartz	Mar 2010	A1
20100076890	Low	Mar 2010	A1
20100078471	Lin et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100078472	Lin et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100082468	Low et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100082470	Walach	Apr 2010	A1
20100112975	Sennett	May 2010	A1
20100128131	Tenchio et al.	May 2010	A1
20100150424	Nepomniachtchi et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100161408	Karson	Jun 2010	A1
20100165015	Barkley et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100198733	Gantman et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100201711	Fillion et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100225773	Lee	Sep 2010	A1
20100226559	Najari et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100260408	Prakash et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100262522	Anderson et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100262607	Vassilvitskii	Oct 2010	A1
20100274693	Bause et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100287250	Carlson	Nov 2010	A1
20100312705	Caruso et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110015963	Chafle	Jan 2011	A1
20110016084	Mundy et al.	Jan 2011	A1
20110016109	Vassilvitskii	Jan 2011	A1
20110054780	Dhanani	Mar 2011	A1
20110069180	Nijemcevic et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110082747	Khan	Apr 2011	A1
20110083101	Sharon	Apr 2011	A1
20110105092	Felt	May 2011	A1
20110106675	Perlman	May 2011	A1
20110112967	Anderson et al.	May 2011	A1
20110112985	Kocmond	May 2011	A1
20110170740	Coleman	Jul 2011	A1
20110191161	Dai	Aug 2011	A1
20110251956	Cantley et al.	Oct 2011	A1
20110276483	Saegert et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110280450	Nepomniachtchi et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110285874	Showering et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110310442	Popadic et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20120036014	Sunkada	Feb 2012	A1
20120045112	Lundblad et al.	Feb 2012	A1
20120047070	Pharris	Feb 2012	A1
20120052874	Kumar	Mar 2012	A1
20120062732	Marman et al.	Mar 2012	A1
20120089514	Kraemling et al.	Apr 2012	A1
20120098705	Yost	Apr 2012	A1
20120099792	Chevion et al.	Apr 2012	A1
20120109793	Abeles	May 2012	A1
20120113489	Heit et al.	May 2012	A1
20120150767	Chacko	Jun 2012	A1
20120185388	Pranger	Jul 2012	A1
20120185393	Atsmon et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20120229872	Dolev	Sep 2012	A1
20120230577	Calman et al.	Sep 2012	A1
20120296768	Fremont-Smith	Nov 2012	A1
20130021651	Popadic et al.	Jan 2013	A9
20130120595	Roach et al.	May 2013	A1
20130155474	Roach et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20130159183	Lopez	Jun 2013	A1
20130191261	Chandler	Jul 2013	A1
20130198071	Jurss	Aug 2013	A1
20130201534	Carlen	Aug 2013	A1
20130223721	Nepomniachtchi et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130297353	Strange et al.	Nov 2013	A1
20130324160	Sabatellil	Dec 2013	A1
20130332004	Gompert et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20130332219	Clark	Dec 2013	A1
20130346306	Kopp	Dec 2013	A1
20130346307	Kopp	Dec 2013	A1
20140010467	Mochizuki et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140032406	Roach et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140037183	Gorski et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140067661	Elischer	Mar 2014	A1
20140156501	Howe	Jun 2014	A1
20140197922	Stanwood et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140203508	Pedde	Jul 2014	A1
20140207673	Jeffries	Jul 2014	A1
20140207674	Schroeder	Jul 2014	A1
20140236820	Carlton et al.	Aug 2014	A1
20140244476	Shvarts	Aug 2014	A1
20140258169	Wong et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140279453	Belchee et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140313335	Koravadi	Oct 2014	A1
20140351137	Chisholm	Nov 2014	A1
20140374486	Collins, Jr.	Dec 2014	A1
20150039528	Minogue et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150090782	Dent et al.	Apr 2015	A1
20150134517	Cosgray	May 2015	A1
20150235484	Kraeling et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150244994	Jang et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150294523	Smith	Oct 2015	A1
20150348591	Kaps et al.	Dec 2015	A1
20160026866	Sundaresan	Jan 2016	A1
20160034590	Endras et al.	Feb 2016	A1
20160142625	Weksler et al.	May 2016	A1
20160189500	Kim et al.	Jun 2016	A1
20160307388	Williams	Oct 2016	A1
20160335816	Thoppae et al.	Nov 2016	A1
20170039637	Wandelmer	Feb 2017	A1
20170068421	Carlson	Mar 2017	A1
20170132583	Nair	May 2017	A1
20170146602	Samp et al.	May 2017	A1
20170229149	Rothschild et al.	Aug 2017	A1
20170263120	Durie, Jr. et al.	Sep 2017	A1
20170337610	Beguesse	Nov 2017	A1
20180025251	Welinder	Jan 2018	A1
20180108252	Pividori	Apr 2018	A1
20180197118	McLaughlin	Jul 2018	A1
20190026577	Hall et al.	Jan 2019	A1
20190122222	Uechi	Apr 2019	A1
20190311227	Kriegman	Oct 2019	A1
20200311844	Luo	Oct 2020	A1
20210097615	Gunn, Jr.	Apr 2021	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (21)

Number	Date	Country
2619884	Mar 2007	CA
1897644	Jan 2007	CN
1967565	May 2007	CN
0 984 410	Mar 2000	EP
1 855 459	Nov 2007	EP
2004-23158	Jan 2004	JP
2004-23158	Jan 2004	JP
3708807	Oct 2005	JP
2006-174105	Jun 2006	JP
20040076131	Aug 2004	KR
WO 9614707	May 1996	WO
WO 9837655	Aug 1998	WO
WO 0161436	Aug 2001	WO
WO 0161436	Aug 2001	WO
WO 2004008350	Jan 2004	WO
WO 2005043857	May 2005	WO
WO 2005124657	Dec 2005	WO
WO 2006075967	Jul 2006	WO
WO 2006086768	Aug 2006	WO
WO 2006136958	Dec 2006	WO
WO 2007024889	Mar 2007	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (494)

Entry
“Accept “Customer Not Present”Checks,” Accept Check Online, http://checksoftware.com, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Adjusting Brightness and Contrast”, www.eaglesoftware.com/adjustin.htm, retrieved on May 4, 2009 (4 pgs).
“Best practices for producing quality digital image files,” Digital Images Guidelines, http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40247/1/Images-Best_Practice.pdf, downloaded 2007 (2 pgs).
“Chapter 7 Payroll Programs,” Uniform Staff Payroll System, http://www2.oecn.k12.oh.us/www/ssdt/usps/usps_user_guide_005.html, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (9 pgs).
“Check 21—The check is not in the post”, RedTitan Technology 2004 http://www.redtitan.com/check21/htm (3 pgs).
“Check 21 Solutions,” Columbia Financial International, Inc. http://www.columbiafinancial.us/check21/solutions.htm, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).
“Check Fraud: A Guide to Avoiding Losses”, All Net, http://all.net/books/audit/checkfraud/security.htm, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Clearing House Electronic Check Clearing System (CHECCS) Operating Rules,” An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, Jul. 29, 2015 (35 pgs).
“Compliance with Regulation CC”, http./www/federalreserve.gov/Pubs/regcc/regcc.htm, Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pgs).
“Custom Personalized Bank Checks and Address Labels” Checks Your Way Inc., http://www.checksyourway.com/htm/web_pages/faq.htm, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (6 pgs).
“Deposit Now: Quick Start User Guide,” BankServ, 2007, 29 pages.
“Direct Deposit Application for Payroll”, Purdue University, Business Office From 0003, http://purdue.edu/payroll/pdf/dierctdepositapplication.pdf, Jul. 2007 (2 pgs).
“Direct Deposit Authorization Form”, www.umass.edu/humres/library/DDForm.pdf, May 2003 (3 pgs).
“Direct Deposit,” University of Washington, http://www.washington.edu/admin/payroll/directdeposit.html, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“Electronic Billing Problem: The E-check is in the mail” American Banker—vol. 168, No. 95, May 19, 2003 (4 pgs).
“First Wireless Handheld Check and Credit Card Processing Solution Launched by Commerciant®, MobileScape® 5000 Eliminates Bounced Checks, Enables Payments Everywhere,” Business Wire, Mar. 13, 2016, 3 pages.
“Frequently Asked Questions” Bank of America, http://www.bankofamerica.com/deposits/checksave/index.cfm?template-lc_faq_bymail, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (2 pgs).
“Full Service Direct Deposit”, www.nonprofitstaffing.com/images/upload/ditdepform.pdf. cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2001, (2 pgs).
“How to Digitally Deposit a Check Image”, Smart Money Daily, Copyright 2008 (5 pgs).
“ImageNet Mobile Deposit Provides Convenient Check Deposit and Bill Pay to Mobile Consumers,” Miltek Systems, 2008 (2 pgs).
“It's the easiest way to Switch banks”, LNB, http://www.inkby.com/pdf/LNBswitch-kit10-07.pdf cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,996,316, as dated 2007 (7 pgs).
“Lesson 38—More Bank Transactions”, Turtle Soft, http://www.turtlesoft.com/goldenseal-software-manual.lesson38.htm, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).
“Middleware”, David E. Bakken, Encyclopedia of Distributed Computing, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001 (6 pgs).
“Mitek Systems Announces Mobile Deposit Application for Apple iPhone,” http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories/pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-01- . . . , Nov. 25, 2008 (2 pgs).
“NOVA Enhances Electronic Check Service to Benefit Multi-Lane Retailers,” Business Wire, Nov. 28, 2006, 2 pages.
“Personal Finance”, PNC, http://www.pnc.com/webapp/unsec/productsandservice.do?sitearea=/PNC/home/personal/account+services/quick+switch/quick+switch+faqs, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).
“Quicken Bill Pay”, Retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 27, 2007 at: <URL:http://quicken intuit.com/quicken-bill-pay-jhtml>, 2 pgs.
“Refractive Index” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org./wiki/refractiveindex.com Oct. 16, 2007 (4 pgs).
“Remote check deposit is the answer to a company's banking problem,” Daily Breeze, Torrance, CA, Nov. 17, 2006, 2 pgs.
“Remote Deposit Capture”, Plante & Moran, http://plantemoran.com/industries/fincial/institutions/bank/resources/community+bank+advisor/2007+summer+issue/remote+deposit+capture.htm, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“Remote Deposit” National City, http://www.nationalcity.com/smallbusiness/cashmanagement/remotedeposit/default.asp; cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).
“Save on ATM Fees”, RedEye Edition, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, IL Jun. 30, 2007 (2 pgs).
“SNB Check Capture: SmartClient User's Guide,” Nov. 2006, 21 pgs.
“Start to Simplify with Check Imaging a Smarter Way to Bank”, Retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 27, 2007, at <URL:http://www.midnatbank.com/Internet%20Banking/Internet_Banking.html>, 3 pgs.
“Switching Made Easy,” Bank of North Georgia, http://www.banknorthgeorgia.com/cmsmaster/documents/286/documents616.pdf, 2007 (7 pgs).
“Two Words Every Business Should Know: Remote Deposit,” Canon, http://www.rpsolutions.com/rpweb/pdfs/canon_rdc.pdf, 2005 (7 pgs).
“Virtual Bank Checks”, Morebusiness.com, http://www.morebusiness.com/running_yourbusiness/businessbits/d908484987.brc, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).
“WallStreetGrapevine.com” Stocks on the Rise: JADG, BKYI, MITK; Mar. 3, 2008 (4 pgs).
“What is check Fraud”, National Check Fraud Center, http://www.ckfraud.org/ckfraud.html, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).
“Exchangeable image file format for digital still cameras: Exif Version 2.2,” Standard of Electronics and Information Technology Industries Associate, JEITA CP-3451, Technical Standardization Committee on AV & IT Stroage Systems and Equpments, Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association, Apr. 2002 (154 pgs). (retrieved from: http://www.exif.org/Exif2-2.PDF).
“Getting Started with ICLs aka X9.37 Files”, All My Papers, May 2, 2006, 39 pgs.
“Machine Accepts Bank Deposits”, New York Times, Apr. 12, 1961, 1 pg.
“Sprint PCS Vision Guide”, 2005, 86 pgs.
“Vodafone calls on moviles to go live!”, 2002, 8 pgs.
12 CFR § 229.51 and Appendix D to Part 229 (Jan. 1, 2005 edition), 3 pgs.
149 Cong. Rec. H9289, Oct. 8, 2003, 6 pgs.
ABA Routing System Transit Number, Wikipedia, dated Sep. 27, 2006, 3 pgs.
About Network Servers, GlobalSpec (retrieved from https://webarchive.org/web/20051019130842/http://globalspec.com80/LearnMore/Networking_Communication_Equipment/Networking_Equipment/Network_Servers_(“GlobalSpec”).
Accredited Standards Committee Technical Report TR 33-2006, dated Aug. 28, 2006, 75 pgs.
Affinity Federal Credit Union, “Affinity Announces Online Deposit,” Aug. 4, 2005 (1 pg).
Albrecht, W. Steve, “Check Kiting: Detection, Prosecution and Prevention,” The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Nov. 1, 1993 (6 pgs).
Alves, Vander and Borba, Paulo; “Distributed Adapters Pattern: A Design for Object-Oriented Distributed Applications”; First Latin American Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming; Oct. 2001; pp. 132-142; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (11 pgs).
Amber Avalona-Butler/Paraglide, “At Your Service: Best iPhone Apps for Military Lifestyle,” Jul. 9, 2010 (2 pgs).
Anderson, Milton M. “FSML and Echeck”, Financial Services Technology Consortium, 1999 (17 pgs).
Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Modern Operating Systems, Second Edition (2001).
ANS X9.100-140-2004, “Specification for an Image Replacement document—IRD”, American Standard for Financial Services, Oct. 1, 2004, 15 pgs.
ANSI News, Check 21 Goes Into Effect Oct. 28, 2004, dated Oct. 25, 2004, 1 pg.
ANSI X9.7-1999(R2007), Bank Check Background and Convenience Amount Field Specification, dated Jul. 11, 2007, 86 pgs.
ANSI, “Return Reasons for Check Image Exchange of IRDS”, dated May 6, 2016, 23 pgs.
ANSI, “Specifications For Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data”, dated Jul. 11, 2006, 230 pgs.
Apple Announces the New iPhone 3GS—The Fastest, Most Powerful iPhone Yet, Jun. 8, 2009, located on the Internet at: http://www.apple.com.rensroom/2009/06/08Apple-Announces-the-New-iPhone-3GS-The Fastest-Most-Powerful-iPhone-Yet, 4 pgs.
Apple Reinvents the Phone with iPhone, Jan. 2007, located on the Internet at: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2007/01/09Apple-Reinvents-the-Phone-with-iPhone/, 4 pgs.
Aradhye, Hrishikesh B., “A Generic Method for Determining Up/Down Orientation of Text in Roman and Non-Roman Scripts,” Pattern Recognition Society, Dec. 13, 2014, 18 pages.
Archive Index Systems; Panini My Vision X-30 or VX30 or X30 © 1994-2008 Archive Systems, Inc. P./O. Box 40135 Bellevue, WA USA 98015 (2 pgs).
Arnold et al, The Java Programming Language, Fourth Edition (2005).
ASCX9, “Specification for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data”, date Mar. 31, 2003, 156 pgs.
Askey, Canon EOS 40D Review (pts. 1,4,10), Digital Photography Review, located on the Internet at: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos40d, 24 pgs.
Askey, Leica Digilux 2 Review (pts. 1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, May 20, 2004, located on the Internet at: : https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/leicadigilux2, 20 pgs.
Askey, Nikon D300 In-depth Review (pts. 1,3,9), Digital Photography Review, Mar. 12, 2008, located on the Internet at: : https://www.preview.com/reviews/nikond300, 24 pgs.
Askey, Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 Review (pts. 1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, Apr. 11, 2007, located on the Internet at: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmc11, 24 pgs.
Askey, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 Review (pts, 1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, Dec. 6, 2005, located on the Internet at: http://www.dpreview.com.reviews/sonydscr1, 24 pgs.
Associate of German Banks, SEPA 2008: Uniform PAyment Instruments for Europe, Berlin, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Jul. 2007, Bundesverbankd deutscher banken ev, (42 pgs).
Automated Clearing Houses (ACHs), Federal Reserve Bank of New York (May 2000) available at: https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed31.html, (attached as Exhibit 12 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 4 pgs.
Automated Merchant Systems, Inc., “Electornic Check Conversion,” http://www.automatedmerchant.com/electronic_check_conversion.cfm, 2006, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).
Bank Systems & Technology, United Article, May 1, 2006, http://www.banktech.com/showarticle.jhtml?articleID=187003126, “Are you Winning in the Payment World?” (4 pgs).
Bankers' Online, “Training Page: Learning the Bank Numbering System”, Copyright 2004, 2 pgs.
BankServ, “DepositNow: What's the difference?” cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (4 pgs).
BankServ, Product Overview, http://www.bankserv.com/products/remotedeposit.htm, cited in patent No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (3 pgs).
Berman, How Hitchcock Turned a Small Budget Into a Great Triumph, Time.com, Apr. 29, 2015, located on the Internet at: http://time.com/3823112/alfred-hitchcock-shadow-of-a-doubt, 1 pg.
Big Red Book, Adobe Systems Incorporated, copyright 2000, (attached as Exhibit 27 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A's Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 45 pgs.
Bills, Steve, “Automated Amount Scanning Is Trend in Remote-Deposit,” American Banker, New York, NY, Aug. 30, 2005, (3 pgs).
Blafore, Bonnie “Lower Commissions, Fewer Amenities”, Better Investing Madison Heights: Feb. 2003, vol. 52, Iss. 6, (4 pgs).
BLM Technologies, “Case Study: Addressing Check 21 and RDC Error and Fraud Threats,”Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jun. 11, 2007, Retrieved from http://www.remotedepositcapture.com/News/june_11_2007.htm on Feb. 19, 2008 (5 pgs).
Blue Mountain Consulting, from URL: www.bluemontainconsulting.com, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Apr. 26, 2006 (3 pgs).
Board of Governors of the federal reserve system, “Report to the Congress on the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003” Apr. 2007, Submitted to Congress pursuant to section 16 of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003, (59 pgs).
BrainJar Validation Algorithms, archived on Mar. 16, 2016 from BrainJar.com, 2 pgs.
Braun, Tim, “Camdesk—Towards Portable and Easy Document Capture,” Image Understanding and Pattern Recognition Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Technical Report, Mar. 29, 2005 (64 pgs). (Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/93b2/ea0d12f24c91f3c46fa1c0d58a76bb132bd2.pdf).
Bruene, Jim; “Check Free to Enable In-Home Remote Check Deposit for Consumers and Small Business”, NetBanker.com, Financial Insite, Inc., http://www.netbanker.com/2008/02/checkfree_to_enableinhome_rem.html, Feb. 5, 2008 (3 pgs).
Bruene, Jim; “Digital Federal Credit Union and Four Others Offer Consumer Remote Deposit Capture Through EasCorp”, NetBanker—Tracking Online Finance, www.netbanker.com/2008/04/digital_federal_credit_union_a.html, Apr. 13, 2008 (3 pgs).
Bruno, M., “Instant Messaging,” Bank Technology News, Dec. 2002 (3 pgs).
Burnett, J. “Depository Bank Edorsement Requirements,” BankersOnline.com, http://www.bankersonline.com/cgi-bin/printview/printview.pl, Jan. 6, 2003 (3 pgs).
Callahan, J., “The first camera phone was sold 20 years ago, and it's not what you expect”, Adroid Authority, 2019, 5 pgs.
Canon EOS 40D Digital Camera Instruction Manual, located on the Internet at: http://gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/6/0900008236/01/EOS40D_HG_EN.pdf (attached as Exhibit 6 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 38 pgs.
Canon White Paper, “Two Words Every Business Should Know—Remote Deposit”, dated 2005, 7 pgs.
Canon, ImageFormula CR-25/CR-55, “Improve Your Bottom Line with Front-Line Efficiencies”, 0117W117, 1207-55/25-1 OM-BSP, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,587 as dated 2007. (4 pgs).
Caplan, J. et al., “Most Influential Gadgets and Gizmos 2002: Sanyo SCP-5300”, 2002, 1 pg.
Carrubba, P. et al., “Remote Deposit Capture: A White Paper Addressing Regulatory, Operational and Risk Issues,” NetDeposit, Inc., 2006 (11 pgs).
CBM 2019-00027, Declaration of Bharat Prasad, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 32 pgs.
CBM 2019-00027, Patent Owner Preliminary Response and Exhibits 2001-1042, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 91 pgs.
CBM 2019-00028, “Motorola, Palm collaborate on smart phone”, Copyright 2000 by Crin Communications, Inc., 1 pg.
CBM 2019-00028, Aspire 9800 Series User Guide, Copyright 2006 by Acer International, 122 pgs.
CBM 2019-00028, Dell XPS M1210 Owner's Manual Copyright 2006 by Dell Inc., 192 pgs.
CBM 2019-00028, Estridge, Bonnie “Is your phone smart enough?: The series that cute through the technobabble to bring you the best advice on the latest gadgets”, Copyright 2006 by XPRESS—A1 Nsr Media, 3 pgs.
CBM 2019-00028, Lawler, Ryan “Apple shows Intel-based Macs, surge revenue”, Copyright 2006 by The Yomiuri Shimbun, 2 pgs.
CBM 2019-00028, Nasaw, Daniel “Viruses Pose threat to “Smart”Cellphones—Computer Programs Could Cripple Devices and Shut Down Wireless Networks”, Copyright 2004 by Factiva, 2 pgs.
CBM 2019-00028, Seitz, Patrick “Multifunction Trend Shaking Up The Handheld Device Industry; Solid Sales Expected in 2004; PDA, handset, camera—one single, small product can fill a variety of role”, Copyright 2004 Investor's Business Daily, Inc., 3 pgs.
CBM 2019-00028, United Services Automobile Associates (“USAA”)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 73 pgs.
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Decision Dismissing Petition and Terminating Proceeding 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a) and 42.71(a), dated Apr. 26, 2019, 5 pgs.
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Matthew Calman In Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 14 pgs.
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Tim Crews In Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 8 pgs.
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs.
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs.
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 75 pgs.
CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List, dated Mar. 19, 2019, 2 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Declaration of Matthew Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 15 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.208, dated Jun. 3, 2019, 28 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper No. 14, dated Apr. 10, 2019, 10 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Petitioner's Updated Exhibits List, dated May 14, 2019, 7 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 91 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List Pursuant to 37 CFR 42.63(e), dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs.
CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.208, dated May 15, 2019, 33 pgs.
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Declaration of Matthew Calman In Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 14 pgs.
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Declaration of Tim Crews In Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 8 pgs.
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Defendant's Claim Construction Brief and supporting exhibits, United Services Autombile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Apr. 25, 2019, 36 pgs.
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper 14, dated Apr. 30, 2019, 7 pgs.
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, United Services Autombile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 99 pgs.
CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, United Services Autombile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List Pursuant to 37 CFR 43.63(e), dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs.
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779 Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs.
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.208, dated Jun. 3, 2019, 27 pgs.
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs.
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper No. 15, dated May 1, 2019, 7 pgs.
CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, United Services Autombile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 103 pgs.
CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 147 pgs.
CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 3 pgs.
CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Petition For Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-16 and 18 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 93 pgs.
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 94 pgs.
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Notice of Filing Date Accorded To Petition and Time For Filing Patent owner Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 3 pgs.
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Petition For Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-30 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 99 pgs.
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List (as of Apr. 1, 2019) for U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Apr. 1, 2019, 5 pgs.
CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Preliminary Claim Constructions And Extrinsic Evidence, dated Mar. 15, 2019, 74 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, “64 Million Smart Phones Shipped Worldwide in 2006” Canalys Newsroom, 2006, 3 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, “Smarter Than Your Average Phone”, Copyright 2006 by Factiva, 4 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, 00000 C720w User Manual for Windows Mobile Smart Phone, Copyright 2006, 352 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, 17-Inch MacBook Pro User's Guide, Copyright 2006 by Apple Computer, Inc., 144 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, Burney, Brett “MacBook Pro with Intel processor is fast, innovative”, Copyright 2006 by Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 2 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, Declaration of Matthew A. Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 8, 28 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, Jewell, Mark “Cell Phone Shipments Reach Record 208M” Copyright 2005 by Associated Press, 1 pg.
CBM2019-00028, Malykhina, Elena “Get Smart”, Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company, 6 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, Nokia 9500 Communicator user Guide, Copyright 2006 by Nokia Corporation, 112 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, Palm Treo 700W Smartphone manual, Copyright 2005 by Palm, Inc., 96 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, Robinson, Daniel, “Client Week—Handsets advance at 3GSM”, Copyright 2004 by VNU Business Publications Ltd., 2 pgs.
CBM2019-00028, Wong, May “HP unveils new mobile computers”, Copyright 2006 by The Buffalo News, 2 pgs.
CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 76 pgs.
CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Petition For Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-3, 5-14, 16-29 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 88 pgs.
CBM2019-00029, “Dynamism.com: Take tomorrow's tech home today with Dynamism.com: Latest gadgets merge next generation technology with high style design”, Copyright 2006 Normans Media Limited, 2 pgs.
CBM2019-00029, Declaration of Matthew A. Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 29 pgs.
CBM2019-00029, Defendant's Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 31, 2019, 28 pgs.
CBM2019-00029, Hp User Guide, Additional Product Information, Copyright 2006 by Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., 204 pgs.
CBM2019-00029, Palenchar, Joseph, “PDA Phone Adds WIFI VolP, Turn-By- Turn GPS Navigation”, Copyright 2006 by Reed Business Information, 2 pgs.
CBM2019-00029, Pocket PC User Manual, Version 1, dated May 2006 by Microsoft, 225 pgs.
CBM2019-00029, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 76 pgs.
CBR online, “Diebold launches ATM depository technology”, Oct. 4, 2007, 5 pgs.
Century Remote Deposit High-Speed Scanner User's Manual Release 2006, (Century Manual), Century Bank, 2006, (32 pgs).
Certificate of Accuracy related to Article entitled, “Deposit checks by mobile” on webpage: https://www.elmundo.es/navegante/2005/07/21/empresas/1121957427.html signed by Christian Paul Scrogum (translator) on Sep. 9, 2021.
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act Foundation for Check 21 Compliance Training, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, (Oct. 16, 2004), available on the Internet at: https://web.archive.org/web/20041016100648/https://www.ffiec.gov/exam/ch eck21/check21foundationdoc.htm, (excerpts attached as Exhibit 20 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 11 pgs.
Chen, Brian et al., iPhone 3GS Trounces Predecessors, Rivals in Web Browser Speed Test, Wired, Jun. 24, 2009, located on the Internet at: www.wired.com/2009.3gs-speed/, 10 pgs.
Cheq Information Technology White Paper, “Teller Scanner Performance and Scanner Design: Camera Position Relative to the Feeder”, dated 2005, 7 pgs.
Chiang, Chuck, The Bulletin, “Remote banking offered”, http://bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060201/BIZ0102/602010327&templ . . . , May 23, 2008 (2 pgs).
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 13, 2019, 48 pgs.
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 36 pgs.
CNN.com/technology, “Scan, deposit checks from home”, www.cnn.com/2008ITECH/biztech/02/07/check.scanning.ap/index.html, Feb. 7, 2008 (3 pgs).
Constanzo, Chris, “Remote Check Deposit: Wells Captures A New Checking Twist”, Bank Technology News Article—May 2005, www.americanbanker.com/btn_article.html?id=20050502YQ50FSYG (2 pgs).
Consumer Assistance & Information—Check 21 https://www.fdic.gov/consumers/assistance/protection/check21.html (FDIC).
Cormac Herley, “Recursive Method to Extract Rectangular Objects From Scans”, 4 pages, Oct. 2003.
Craig Vaream, “Image Deposit Solutions” Emerging Solutions for More Efficient Check Processing, Nov. 2005, 16 pages.
Craig, Ben, “Resisting Electronic Payment Systems: Burning Down the House?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Jul. 1999 (4 pgs).
Creativepaymentsolutions.com, “Creative Payment Solutions—Websolution,” www.creativepaymentsolution.com/cps/financialservices/websolution/default.html, Copyright 2008, Creative Payment Solutions, Inc. (1 pg).
Credit Union Journal, “The Ramifications of Remote Deposit Capture Success”, www.cuiournal.com/orintthis.html?id=20080411 EODZT57G, Apr. 14, 2008 (1 pg).
Credit Union Journal, “AFCU Averaging 80 DepositHome Transactions Per Day”, Credit Union Journal, Aug. 15, 2005 (1 pg).
Credit Union Management, “When You wish Upon an Imaging System . . . the Right Selection Process can be the Shining Star,” Credit Union Management, Aug. 1993, printed from the Internet at <http://search.proquest.com/docview/227756409/14138420743684F7722/15?accountid=14 . . . >, on Oct. 19, 2013 (11 pgs).
DCU Member's Monthly—Jan. 2008, “PC Deposit—Deposit Checks from Home!”, http://www.mycreditunionnewsletter.com/dcu/01 08/page1.html, Copyright 2008 Digital Federal Credit Union (2 pgs).
De Jesus, A. et al., “Distributed Check Processing in a Check 21 Environment: An educational overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with implementing distributed check imaging and processing solutions,” Panini, 2004, pp. 1-22.
De Queiroz, Ricardo et al., “Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Model for Compound Image Compression”, 1998 (14 pgs).
Debello, James et al., “RDM and Mitek Systems to Provide Mobile Check Deposit,” Mitek Systems, Inc., San Diego, California and Waterloo, Ontario, (Feb. 24, 2009), 2 pgs.
Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., CBM2019-0004, Nov. 8, 2018, 180 pgs.
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 75 pgs.
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 12, 2019, 32 pgs.
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 72 pgs.
Defendant's Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 31, 2019, 111 pgs.
Defendant's Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 31, 2019, 28 pgs.
DeYoung, Robert; “The Financial Performance of Pure Play Internet Banks”; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicsago Economic Perspectives; 2001; pp. 60-75; vol. 25, No. 1 (16 pgs).
Dhandra, B.V. et al., “Skew Detection in Binary Image Documents Based on Image Dilation and Region labeling Approach”, IEEE, The 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06), 2006, 4 pgs.
Dias, Danilo et al., “A Model for the Electronic Representation of Bank Check”, Brasilia Univ. Oct. 2006 (5 pgs).
Digital Transactions News, “An ACH-Image Proposal For Check Roils Banks and Networks” May 26, 2006 (3 pgs).
Dinan, R.F. et al., “Image Plus High Performance Transaction System”, IBM Systems Journal, 1990 vol. 29, No. 3 (14 pgs).
Doermann, D. et al., “The function of documents”, Image and Vision Computing, vol. 16, 1998, pp. 799-814.
Doermann, David et al., “Progress in Camera-Based Document Image Analysis,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (IDCAR 2003) 0-7695-1960-1/03, 2003, IEEE Computer Society, 11 pages.
Duvall, Mel, “Remote Deposit Capture,” Baseline, vol. 1, Issue 70, Mar. 2007, 2 pgs.
eCU Technologies, “Upost Remote Deposit Solution,” Retrieved from the Internet https://www.eutechnologies.com/products/upost.html, downloaded 2009 (1 pg).
EFT Network Unveils FAXTellerPlus, EFT Network, Inc., www.eftnetwork.com, Jan. 13, 2009 (2 pgs).
ElectronicPaymentProviders, Inc., “FAQs: ACH/ARC, CheckVerification/Conversion/Guarantee, RCK Check Re-Presentment,” http://www.useapp.com/faw.htm, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).
Excerpts from American National Standard for Financial Services, ANS, X9.100-140-2004-Specifications for an Image Replacement Document—IRD, Oct. 1, 2004, 16 pgs.
FDIC—Remote Capture: A Primer, 2009, 3 pgs.
FDIC: Check Clearing for the 21st Century act (Check21), FED, Deposit Ins. Corp., Apr. 25, 2016 (retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20161005124304/https://www.fdic.gov/consumers/assistance/protection/check21.html (“FDIC”).
Federal Check 21 Act, “New Check 21 Act effective Oct. 28, 2004: Bank No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks,” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org.initiatives/content/check21_content.html, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,873,200, as dated Dec. 2005 (20 pgs).
Federal Reserve Adoption of DSTU X9.37-2003, Image Cash Letter Customer Documentation Version 1.8, dated Oct. 1, 2008, 48 pgs.
Federal Reserve Bank, “Reserve Banks to Adopt DSTU X9.37-2003 Format for Check 21 Image Services”, 2004, 2 pgs.
Federal Reserve Banks Plan Black-and-White Image Standard and Quality Check, May 2004, 2 pgs.
Federal Reserve Board, “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, FRB, http://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/trucation/, Mar. 1, 2006 (1 pg).
Federal Reserve System, “12 CFR, Part 229 [Regulation CC; Docket No. R- 0926]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks,” Federal Registrar, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 1-50.
Federal Reserve System, “Part IV, 12 CFR Part 229 [Regulation CC; Docket No. R-1176]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks; Final Rule,” Federal Registrar, vol. 69, No. 149, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 47290-47328.
Fest, Glen., “Patently Unaware” Bank Technology News, Apr. 2006, Retrieved from the internet at URL:http://banktechnews.com/article.html?id=2006403T7612618 (6 pgs).
Fidelity Information Services, “Strategic Vision Embraces Major Changes in Financial Services Solutions: Fidelity's long-term product strategy ushers in new era of application design and processing,” Insight, 2004, pp. 1-14.
Fielding, R. et al., “RFC-2616—Hypertext Transfer Protocol”, Network Working Group, The Internet Society copyright 1999, 177 pgs.
Fisher, Dan M., “Home Banking in the 21st Century: Remote Capture Has Gone Retail”, May 2008 (4 pgs).
Fletcher, Lloyd A., and Rangachar Kasturi, “A robust algorithm for text string separation from mixed text/graphics images”, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 10.6 (1988), 910-918 (1988).
Fujisawa, H. et al., “Information Capturing Camera and Developmental Issues”, IEEE Xplore, downloaded on Aug. 18, 2020, 4 pgs.
Furst, Karen et al., “Internet Banking: Developments and Prospects”, Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper 2000-9, Sep. 2000 (60 pgs).
Garry, M., “Checking Options: Retailers face an evolving landscape for electronic check processing that will require them to choose among several scenarios,” Supermarket News, vol. 53, No. 49, 2005 (3 pgs).
Gates, A History of Wireless Standards, Wi-Fi Back to Basics, Aerohive Blog, Jul. 2015, located on the Internet at: http://blog.aerohive.com/a-history-of-wireless-standards, 5 pgs.
German Shegalov, Diplom-Informatiker, “Integrated Data, Message, and Process Recovery for Failure Masking in Web Services”, Dissertation Jul. 2005 (146 pgs).
Guidelines for Evaluation of Radio Transmission Technologies for IMT-2000, dated 1997, ITU-R-M.1225, located on the Internet at: https://www.itu.int/dmspubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M, 1225-0-199702-l!!PDF-E.pdf, 60 pgs.
Gupta, Amar et al., “An Integrated Architecture for Recognition of Totally Unconstrained Handwritten Numerals”, WP#3765, Jan. 1993, Productivity from Information Technology “Profit” Research Initiative Sloan School of Management (20 pgs).
Gupta, Maya R. et al., “OCR binarization and image pre-processing for searching historical documents,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, No. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 389-397.
Gutierrez, L., “Innovation: From Campus to Startup”, Business Watch, 2008, 2 pgs.
Hale, J., “Picture this: Check 21 uses digital technology to speed check processing and shorten lag time,” Columbus Business First, http://columbus.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2005/03/14focus1.html, downloaded 2007 (3 pgs).
Halonen et al., GSM, GPRS, and EDGE Performance: Evolution Towards 3G/UMTS, Second Edition (2003).
Hartly, Thomas, “Banks Check Out New Image”, Business First, Buffalo: Jul. 19, 2004, vol. 20, Issure 43, (3 pgs).
Heckenberg, D. “Using Mac OS X for Real-Time Image Processing” Oct. 8, 2003 (15 pgs).
Hello Ocean User Manual, located on the Internet at: https://standupwireless.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Manual_PAN-TECH_OCEAN.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 10 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018) 76 pgs.
Herley, Cormac, “Efficient Inscribing of Noisy Rectangular Objects in Scanned Images,” 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 4 pages.
Heron, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), 12 Network Security 8 (2009).
Higgins, Ray et al., “Working With Image Cash Letters (ISLs) X9.37, 180 or 187 files”, All My Papers, 2009, 36 pgs.
Hildebrand, C. et al., “Electronic Money,” Oracle, http://www.oracle.com/oramag/profit/05-feb/p15financial.html, 2005, downloaded Oct. 18, 2005 (5 pgs).
Hill, “From J-Phone to Lumina 1020: A complete history of the camera phone”, Digital Trends, 2020, 9 pgs.
Hill, Simon, “From J-Phone to Lumina 1020: A Complete History of the Camera Phone”, dated Aug. 11, 2013, 19 pgs.
Hillebrand, G., “Questions and Answers About the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, 'Check 21,” ConsumersUnion.org, http://www.consumersunion.org/finance/ckclear1002.htm, Jul. 27, 2004, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (6 pgs).
Hoffman, J., “Before there Were Smartphones, There was I-Mode”, 1999, 5 pgs.
HTC Touch Diamond Manual, copyright 2008, (attached as Exhibit 11 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 257 pgs.
Humphrey, David B. and Hunt, Robert, “Getting Rid of Paper: Savings From Check 21”, Working Paper No. 12-12, Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, (May 2012), available on the Internet at: https://philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-and-data/publications/working-papers/2012/wp12-12.pdf, (attached as Exhibit 14 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 29 pgs.
Iida, Jeanne, “The Back Office: Systems—Image Processing Rolls on as Banks ReapBenefits,” American Banker, Jul. 19, 1993, printed from the Internet at <http://search.proquest.com/docview/292903245/14138420743684F7722/14?accountid=14 . . . >, on Oct. 19, 2013 (3 pgs).
Image Master, “Photo Restoration: We specialize in digital photo restoration and photograph repair of family pictures”, http://www.imphotorepair.com, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as downloaded Apr. 2007 (1 pg).
Immich et al., Performance Analysis of Five Interprocess CommunicAtion Mechanisms Across UNIX Operating Systems, 68 J. Syss. & Sofware 27 (2003).
Instrument—Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, dated Mar. 2, 2019, 1 pg.
Instrument—Definition of Instrument from the Oxford Dictionaries (British & World English), dated Jul. 2, 2017, 44 pgs.
Investment Systems Company, “Portfolio Accounting System,” 2000, 34 pgs.
iPhone App Store Downloads Top 10 Million in First Weekend, Jul. 14, 2008, located on the Internet at: iPhone Store Downloads Top 10 Million in First Weekend, Jul. 14, 2008, located on the Internet at: https://wwwapple.com/newsroom/2008/07/14iPhone-App-Store-Downloads-Top-10-Million-in-First-Weekend, 4 pgs.
iPhone Application Programming Guide Device Support, dated Apr. 26, 2009, 7 pgs.
IPR2022-00049 filed Oct. 22, 2021 on behalf of PNC Bank N.A., 70 pages.
IPR2022-00050 filed Oct. 22, 2021 on behalf of PNC Bank N.A., 126 pages.
IPR2022-00075 filed Nov. 5, 2021 on behalf of PNC Bank N.A., 90 pages.
IPR2022-00076 filed Nov. 17, 2021 on behalf of PNC Bank N.A., 98 pages.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Parties Review, dated Aug. 26, 2019, 28 pgs.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Peter Alexander, PhD, as filed in the IPR on Mar. 20, 2019, 99 pgs.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Exhibit B Proposed Claim Constructions for the '571, '090, '779 and '517 Patents, filed on Feb. 28, 2019, 10 pgs.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Pwner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 27, 2019, 5 pgs.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Petition For Inter Parties Review of Claims 1-19 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, dated Mar. 20, 2019, 56 pgs.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant To Authorization Provided In Paper No. 13, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 9 pgs.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Petitioner's Supplement Exhibit List, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 5 pgs.
IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”)'s Sur-Reply In Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Aug. 8, 2019, 8 pgs.
IPR2019-00815, Declaration of Matthew A. Calman In Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 25 pgs.
IPR2019-00815, Federal Reserve Financial Services Retired: DSTU X9.37-2003, Specifications for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data, Copyright 2006 by Accredited Standards Committee X9, Inc., dated Mar. 31, 2003, 157 pgs.
IPR2019-00815, Invalidity Chart, uploaded on Jun. 27, 2019, 94 pgs.
IPR2019-00815, Supplementary Invalidity Chart, dated on Jun. 27, 2019, 16 pgs.
IPR2019-00815, United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 66 pgs.
IPR2019-01081—exhibit USAA Ex 2044-p 1 Wells Fargo v USAA, titled “Mitek Introduces ImageNet Mobile Deposit”, copyright 2007 by Mitek Systems, 4 pgs.
IPR2019-01081—U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517 B1, Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314; 37 C.F.R. § 42.4, dated Jan. 13, 2020, 60 pgs.
IPR2019-01081 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Petition For Inter Parties Review of Claims 1, 5-10, 12-14, 17-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 78 pgs.
IPR2019-01081, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 135 pgs.
IPR2019-01082—U.S. 8,977,571 B1, Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314; 37 C.F.R. § 42.4, dated Dec. 13, 2019, 56 pgs.
IPR2019-01082 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Petition for Inter Parties Review of Claims 1-13 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 75 pgs.
IPR2019-01082—U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571 B1, Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, dated Jan. 9, 2020, 58 pgs.
IPR2019-01083 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Petition for Inter Parties Review of Claims 1-18 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 74 pgs.
IPR2020-00091, U.S. Pat. No. 9,177,198, Petition for Inter Parties Review of Claims 1-3 and 5-20 U.S. Pat. No. 9,177,198, dated Nov. 7, 2019, 72 pgs.
IPR2020-00882—Mitek Systems, Inc. v. United Services Automobile Association, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, dated Apr. 30, 2020, 102 ps.
IPR2020-00976—Mitek Systems, Inc. v. United Services Automobile Association, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, dated May 22, 2020, 87 pgs.
IPR2020-01101—Mitek Systems, Inc. v. United Services Automobile Association, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, dated Jun. 12, 2020, 91 pgs.
JBC, “What is a MICR Line?,” eHow.com, retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about_4684793_what-micr-line.html on May 4, 2009 (2 pgs).
Johnson, Jennifer J., Secretary of the Board; Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 229, Regulation CC; Docket No. R 1176, “Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks”. cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2009, (89 pgs).
Joinson et al., Olympus E-30 Review (pts. 1,4,8), Digital Photography Review, Mar. 24, 2009, located on the internet at: www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympus30, 26 pgs.
Jung et al, “Rectangle Detection based on a Windowed Hough Transform”, IEEE Xplore, 2004, 8 pgs.
Kendrick, Kevin B., “Check Kiting, Float for Purposes of Profit,” Bank Security & Fraud Prevention, vol. 1, No. 2, 1994 (3 pgs).
Kiser, Elizabeth K.; “Modeling the Whole Firm: The Effect of Multiple Inputs and Financial Intermediation on Bank Deposit Rates;” FEDS Working Paper No. 2004-07; Jun. 3, 2003; pp. 1-46 (46 pgs).
Klein, Robert, Financial Services Technology, “Image Quality and Usability Assurance: Phase 1 Project”, dated Jul. 23, 2004, 67 pgs.
Knerr et al., The A2iA Intercheque System: Courtesy Amount and Legal Amount Recognition for French Checks in Automated Bancheck Processing 43-86, Impedove et al. eds., 1997, 50 pgs.
Knestout, Brian P. et al., “Banking Made Easy” Kiplinger's Personal Finance Washington, Jul. 2003, vol. 57, Iss 7 (5 pgs).
Koga, M. et al., Camera-based Kanji OCR for Mobile-phones: Peactical Issues, IEEE, 2005, 5 pgs.
Kornal Andras et al., “Recognition of Cursive Writing on Personal Checks”, Proceedings of International Workshop on the Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Sep. 1996, (6 pgs).
Lacker, Jeffrey M., “Payment System Disruptions and the Federal Reserve Following Sep. 11, 2001”, The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, (Dec. 23, 2003) (attached as Exhibit 19 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 55 pgs.
Laine, M. et al., “A Standalone OCR System For Mobile Cameraphones”, IEEE, 2006, 5 pgs.
Lampert, Christoph et al., “Oblivious Document Capture and Real-Time Retrieval,” International Workshop on Camera Based Document Analysis and Recognition (CBDAR), 2005 (8 pgs). (Retrieved from: http://www-cs.ccny.cuny.edu/˜wolberg/capstone/bookwarp/LampertCBDAR05.pdf).
Lange, Bill, “Combining Remote Capture and IRD Printing, A Check 21 Strategy For Community and Regional Banks”, dated 2005, 25 pgs.
Leach, et al., A Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) URN Namespace, (Jul. 2005) retrieved from https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt.
Lee, Jeanne, “Mobile Check Deposits: Pro Tips to Ensure They Go Smoothly”, dated Feb. 19, 2016, 6 pgs.
Leica Digilux 2 Instructions located on the Internet: http://www.overgaard.dk/pdf/d2_manual.pdf (attached as Exhibit 2 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 95 pgs.
Levitin, Adam J., Remote Deposit Capture: A Legal and Transactional Overview, Banking Law Journal, p. 115, 2009 (RDC), 8 pgs.
Liang, J et al., “Camera-based analysis of text and documents: a survey”, IJDAR, vol. 7, 2005, pp. 84-104, 21, pgs.
Liang, Jian et al., Camera-Based Analysis of Text and Documents: A Survey, International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Jun. 21, 2005, 21 pages.
Luo, Xi-Peng et al., “Design and Implementation of a Card Reader Based on Build-In Camera,” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004, 4 pages.
MacKenzie, E., Photography Made Easy, copyright 1845, 80 pgs.
Magid, L., “A baby girl and the camera phone were born 20 years ago”, Mercury News, 2017, 3 pgs.
Masonson, L., “Check Truncation and ACH Trends—Automated Clearing Houses”, healthcare financial management associate, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mLm3276/is_n7_v47/ai_14466034/prin t, 1993 (2 pgs).
Matthews, Deborah, “Advanced Technology Makes Remote Deposit Capture Less Risky,” Indiana Bankers Association, Apr. 2008 (2 pgs).
Meara, Bob, “State of Remote Deposit Capture 2015 Mobile Is the New Scanner”, dated May 2015, 56 pgs.
Meara, Bob, “USAA's Mobile Remote Deposit Capture”, Dated Jun. 26, 2009, 2 pgs.
Metro 1 Credit Union, “Remote Banking Services,” hltp://ww\\i.metro1cu.org/metro1cu/remote.html, downloaded Apr. 17, 2007 (4 pgs).
Microsoft Mobile Devices Buyer's Guide, 2012, 4 pgs.
Microsoft Mobile Devices Smartphone, 2003, 2 pgs.
Mirmehdi, M. et al., “Extracting Low Resolution Text with an Active Camera for OCR”, in Proccedings of the IX Spanish Symposium on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing (pp. 43-48), 2001, 6pgs.
Mirmehdi, M. et al., “Towards Optimal Zoom for Automatic Target Recognition”, in Proceedings of the Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, 1:447-454, 1997, 7 pgs.
Mitek Systems, “Imagenet Mobile Deposit”, San Diego, CA, downloaded 2009 (2 pgs).
Mitek Systems: Mitek Systems Launches First Mobile Check Deposit and Bill Pay Application, San Diego, CA, Jan. 22, 2008 (3 pgs).
Mitek Video titled “Mobile Deposit Tour”, Published on Jul. 2, 2009 by Mitek Systems, duration 2 minutes and 13 seconds, located on the Internet at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGD49ybxS2Q, 25 pgs.
Mitek, “Video Release—Mitek MiSnap ™ Mobile Auto Capture Improves Mobile Deposit® User Experience at Ten Leading Financial Institutions”, dated Jul. 15, 2014, 2 pgs.
Mitek's Mobile Deposit Processes More Than Two Billion Checks, $1.5 Trillion in Cumulative Check Value, dated Mar. 8, 2018, 2 pgs.
Mohl, Bruce, “Banks Reimbursing ATM Fee to Compete With Larger Rivals”, Boston Globe, Boston, MA, Sep. 19, 2004 (3 pgs).
Moreau, T., “Payment by Authenticated Facsimile Transmission: a Check Replacement Technology for Small and Medium Enterprises,” Connotech Experts-conseils, Inc., Apr. 1995 (31 pgs).
Motomanual for Motorazr, located on the Internet at: https://www.cellphones.ca/downloads/phones/manuals/motorola-razr-v3xx- manual.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 8 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 34 pgs.
Motomanual, MOTOROKR-E6-GSM-English for wireless phone, copyright 2006, 144 pgs.
Motorola RAZR MAXX V6 User Manual, located on the Internet at: https://www.phonearena.com/phones/Motorola-RAZR-MAXX-V6_id1680, (attached as Exhibit 7 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 36 pgs.
N. Ritter & M. Ruth, The Geo Tiff Data Interchange Standard for Raster Geographic Images, 18 Int. J. Remote Sensing 1637 (1997).
NCR, Mobile Remote Deposit Capture (RDC), copyright 2011, 8 pgs.
Nelson, B. et al., “Remote deposit capture changes the retail landscape,” Northwestern Financial Review, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/miqa3799/is 200607/ai_n16537250, 2006 (3 pgs).
NetBank, Inc., “Branch Out: Annual Report 2004,” 2004 (150 pgs).
NetBank, Inc., “Quick Post: Deposit and Payment Forwarding Service,” 2005 (1 pg).
NetDeposit Awarded Two Patents for Electronic Check Process, NetDeposit, Jun. 18, 2007, (1 pg).
Nikon Digital Camera D300 User's Manual, located on the Internet at: http://download.nikonimglib.com/archive2/iBuJv00Aj97i01y8BrK49XX0Ts69/ D300,EU(En)04.pdf (attached as Exhibit 5 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 195 pgs.
Nixon, Julie et al., “Fiserv Research Finds Banks are Interested in Offering Mobile Deposit Capture as an,” Fiserv, Inc. Brookfield, Wis., (Business Wire), (Feb. 20, 2009), 2 pgs.
Nokia N90 Phone Features, 2005, 4 pgs.
Nokia N90 Review Digital Trends, dated Feb. 11, 2019, obtained from the Internet at: https://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/nokia-n90- review/, 11 pgs.
Nokia N90 User Guide, 2005, 132 pgs.
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 1 of 3, 67 pgs.
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 2 of 3, 60 pgs.
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 3 of 3, 53 pgs.
Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, located on the Internet at: https://www.nokia.com/en_int/phones/sites/default/files/user-guides/Nokia_N95_8GB_Extended_UG_en.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 9 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 77 pgs.
Online Deposit: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.depositnow.com/faq.html, Copyright 2008 (1 pg).
Onlinecheck.com/Merchant Advisors, “Real-Time Check Debit”, Merchant Advisors: Retail Check Processing Check Conversion, http://www.onlinecheck/wach/rcareal.htm, cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (3 pgs).
Oxley, Michael G., from committee on Financial Services: “Check Clearing For the 21st Century Act, 108th Congress, 1st Session House of Representatives report 108-132”, Jun. 2003 (20 pgs).
Oxley, Michael G., from committee of conference: “Check Clearing For the 21st Century Act” 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-291, Oct. 1, 2003 (20 pgs).
P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statment, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 5, 2019, 190 pgs.
Palacios, Rafael et al., “Automatic Processing of Brazilian Bank Checks”, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2002 (28 pgs).
Panasonic Operating Instructions for Digital Camera/Lens Kit Model No. DMC-L1K, https://www.panasonic.com/content/dam/Panasonic/support_manual/Digital_Still_Camera/English_01-vqt0-vqt2/vqt0w95_L1_oi.pdf (attached as Exhibit 4 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Back N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 129 pgs.
Panini My Vision X Operator Manual, Panini, 2004, (cited in IPR2020-00093, U.S. Pat. No. 9,892,454), 51 pgs.
Pappas, A., “Taking Sharper Pictures Is Now a Snap as Sprint Launches First 1.3-Megapixal Camera Phone in the United States”, 2004, 2 pgs.
Parikh, T., “Mobile Phones and Paper Documents: Evaluating a New Approach for Capturing Microfinance Data in Rural India”, CHI 2006 Proceedings, 2006, 10 pgs.
Parikh, T., “Using Mobile Phones for Secure, Distributed Document Processing in the Developing World”, IEE Persuasive Computing, vol. 4, No. 2, 2009, 9 pgs.
Parties'P.R.4-5(D) Joint Claim Construciton Chart, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 14, 2019, 28 pgs.
Parties'P.R.4-5(D) Joint Claim Construciton Chart, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated Jun. 18, 2019, 27 pgs.
Parties'P.R.4-5(D) Joint Claim Construciton Chart, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2;18-cv-245, dated May 9, 2019, 25 pgs.
Patent Dislaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, filed on Mar. 4, 2019, 2 pgs.
Patent Dislaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, filed on Feb. 20, 2019, 2 pgs.
Patent Dislaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, filed on Mar. 4, 2019, 2 pgs.
Patent Dislaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, filed on Feb. 20, 2019, 2 pgs.
Patterson, Scott “USAA Deposit@Home—Another WOW moment for Net Banking”, NextCU.com, Jan. 26, 2007 (5 pgs).
Pbmplus—image file format conversion package, retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20040202224728/https:/www.acme.com/software/pbmplus/.
Petition filed by PNC Bank N.A. for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-18 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,621,559, dated Jul. 21, 2021, IPR2021-01076, 111 pages.
Petition filed by PNC Bank N.A. for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-18 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,621,559, dated Jul. 21, 2021, IPR2021-01077, 100 pages.
Petition filed by PNC Bank N.A. for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-23 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,482,432, dated Jul. 14, 2021, IPR2021-01071, 106 pages.
Petition filed by PNC Bank N.A. for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-30 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, filed Aug. 27, 2021, IPR2021-01381, 127 pages.
Petition filed by PNC Bank N.A. for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-7, 10-21 and 23 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,482,432, dated Jul. 14, 2021, IPR2021-01074.
Petition filed by PNC Bank N.A. for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, filed Aug. 27, 2021, IPR2021-01399, 113 pages.
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 98 pgs.
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 90 pgs.
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 95 pgs.
Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-23 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 101 pgs.
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant's Answer to Defendant and Counterclaims Plaintiff's Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, & Counterclaims, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 36 pgs.
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant's Answer to Defendant and Counterclaims Plaintiff's Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, & Counterclaims, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 26, 2019, 18 pgs.
Plaintiff's Notice of Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated May 15, 2019, 36 pgs.
Plaintiff's Notice of Decisions Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 6, 2019, 61 pgs.
Plaintiff's Notice of Filing Claim Construction Presentation, filled in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated May 23, 2019, 106 pgs.
PNC Bank to Offer Ease of Online Deposit Service Integrated with QuickBooks to Small Business, RemoteDepositCapture.com, Jul. 24, 2006, 2 pgs.
POP, ARC and BOC—A Comparison, Federal Reserve Banks, at 1(Jan. 7, 2009), available on the Internet at: https://web.archive.org/web/20090107101808/https://www.frbservices.org/fil es/eventseducation/ pdf/pop_arc_boc_comparison.pdf (attached as Exhibit 13 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 3 pgs.
Provisional patent application filed by Wells Fargo Bank, dated Jan. 29, 2008, 134 pgs.
Public Law 108-100, 108 Congress; “An Act Check Clearing For the 21st Century Act”, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 STAT. 1177 (18 pgs).
Quinn and Roberds, The Evolution of the Check as a Means of Payment: A Historical Survey, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Economic Review, 2008, 30 pgs.
Rao, Bharat; “The Internet And The Revolution in Distribution: A Cross—Industry Examination”; Technology in Society; 1999; pp. 287-306; vol. 21, No. 3 (20 pgs).
Readdle, Why Scanner Pro is Way Better Than Your Camera? (Jun. 27, 2016) retrieved from https://readdle.com/blog/why-scanner-pro-is-way- better-than-your-camera.
Remote Deposit Capture Basic Requirements, dated Aug. 22, 2009, 1 pg.
Remote Deposit Capture.com Scanner Matrix, dated Oct. 21, 2011, 3 pgs.
Remotedepositcapture, URL:www.remotedepositcapture.com, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (5 pgs).
RemoteDepositCapture.com, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 6, 2006, “BankServ Announces New Remote Deposit Product Integrated with QuickBooks” (3 pgs).
Remotedepsitcapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” ROC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/overview/RDC_overview.htm, Cited in Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Mar. 12, 2007 (4 pgs).
Richey, J. C. et al., “EE 4530 Check Imaging,” Nov. 18, 2008 (10 pgs).
Ritzer, J.R. “Hinky Dinky helped spearhead POS, remote banking movement”, Bank Systems and Equipment, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 1984 (1 pg).
Rivlin, Alice M. et al., Chair, Vice Chair—Board of Governors, Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism—Federal Reserve System, “ The Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism”, Jan. 1998 (41 pgs).
Rockwell, The Megapixel Myth, KenRickwell.com, 2008, located on the Internet at: http://kewrockwell.com.tech/mpmyth.htm, 6 pgs.
Rohs, M. et al., “A Conceptual Framework for Camera Phone-based Interaction Techniques”, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, 19 pgs.
Rose, Sarah et al., “Best of the We: The Top 50 Financial Websites”, Money, New York, Dec. 1999, vol. 28, Iss. 12 (8 pgs).
Rowles, Tony, USAA-v. Wells Fargo No. 2:16-cv-245-JRGL e-mail correspondence dated Jan. 24, 2019, 2 pgs.
Santomero, The Evolution of Payments in the U.S.: Paper vs. Electronic (2005) retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20051210185509/https://www.philadelphiafed.org/publicaffairs/speeches/2005_santomero9.html.
SCH0i910 Portable Dualmode Smartphone User Guide by Samsung, Copyright 2009 Samsung Electronics Canada, downloadable from www.manualslib.com, 168 pgs.
Schindler, Scanner Pro Review (Dec. 27, 2016) retrieved from https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/scAnner-pro.
Sechrest, Stuart et al., “Windows XP Performance”, Microsoft, dated Jun. 1, 2001, 20 pgs.
Shah, Moore's Law, Continuous Everywhere But Differentiable Nowhere, Feb. 12, 2009, located on the Internet at: http://samjshah.com/2009/02/24/morres-law/, 5 pgs.
Shelby, Hon. Richard C. (Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs); “Check Truncation Act of 2003”, calendar No. 168, 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-79, Jun. 2003 (27 pgs).
Sing Li & Jonathan Knudsen, Beginning J2ME: From Novice to Professional, Third Edition (2005), ISBN (pbk): 1-59059-479-7, 468 pages.
Sony Digital Camera User's Guide/ Trouble Shooting Operating Instrucitons, copyright 2005, located on the Internet at: https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/support/res/manuals/2654/26544941M.pdf (attached as Exhibit 3 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 136 pgs.
Sony Ericsson K800i—Product Overview, 2006, 2 pgs.
Sony Ericsson K800i, User Manual, Part 1, 2006, 98 pgs.
SoyBank Anywhere, “Consumer Internet Banking Service Agreement,” Dec. 6, 2004 (6 pgs).
Spencer, Harvey, “White Paper Check 21 Controlling Image Quality At The Point of Capture”, dated 2004, 7 pgs.
Sprint PCS Vision Picture Phone, PM-8920 by Audiovox, User's Manual, Part 1, 2004, 103 pgs.
Stellin, Susan, “Bank Will Allow Customers to Direct Deposit by iPhone”, the New York Times article dated Aug. 9, 2009, obtained from the Internet at: www.nytimes.com/2009/08/10/technology/10check.html, 3 pgs.
Sumits, Major Mobile Milestones—The Last 15 Years, and the Next Five, Cisco Blogs, Feb. 3, 2016, located on the Internet at: https://blogs.cisco.com/sp/mobile-vni-major-mobile-milesrones-the-last15-years-and-the-next-five, 12 pgs.
Teixeira, D., “Comment: Time to Overhaul Deposit Processing Systems,” American Banker, Dec. 10, 1998, vol. 163, No. 235, p. 15 (3 pgs).
Thailandguru.com: How and where to Pay Bills @ www.thailandguru.com/paying-bills.html, © 1999-2007 (2 pgs).
The Automated Clearinghouse, “Retail Payment Systems; Payment Instruments Clearing and Settlement: The Automated Clearinghouse (ACH)”, www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/booklets/retailretail_02d.html, Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Dec. 2005 (3 pgs).
The Green Sheet 2.0: Newswire, “CO-OP adds home deposit capabilities to suite of check imaging products”, www.greensheet.com/newswire.php?newswire_id=8799, Mar. 5, 2008 (2 pgs).
Timothy R. Crews list of Patents, printed from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Feb. 13, 2019, 7 pgs.
Tochip, E. et al., “Camera Phone Color Appearance Utility—Finding a Way to Identify Camera Phone Picture Color”, 25 pages, 2007.
Tygar, J.D., Atomicity in Electronic Commerce, In ACM Networker, 2:2, Apr./May 1998 (12 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 61/022,279, dated Jan. 18, 2008, (cited in IPR2020-00090, U.S. Pat. No. 9,177,197), 35 pgs.
USAA's Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 6 pgs.
USAA's Objections To Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Aug. 12, 2019, 10 pgs.
USAA's Opening Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 17, 2019, 32 pgs.
USAA's Opening Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Apr. 11, 2019, 32 pgs.
USAA's Reply Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 2, 2019, 227 pgs.
USAA's Reply to Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 2, 2019, 15 pgs.
USAA's Reply Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated Jun. 7, 2019, 14 pgs.
Valentine, Lisa, “Remote Deposit Capture Hot Just Got Hotter,” ABA Banking Journal, Mar. 2006, p. 1-9.
Van Dyke, Jim, “2017 Mitek Mobile Deposit Benchmark Report”, copyright 2017, 25 pgs.
Vaream, Craig, “Image Deposit Solutions: Emerging Solutions for More Efficient Check Processing,” JP Morgan Chase, Nov. 2005 (16 pgs).
Wade, Will, “Early Debate on Remote-Capture Risk,” American Banker, New York, NY, May 26, 2004 (3 pgs).
Wade, Will, “Early Notes: Updating Consumers on Check 21” American Banker Aug. 10, 2004 (3 pgs).
Wallison, Peter J., “Wal-Mart Case Exposes Flaws in Banking-Commerce Split”, American Banker, vol. 167. No. 8, Jan. 11, 2002 (3 pgs).
Wang, Ching-Lin et al. “Chinese document image retrieval system based on proportion of black pixel area in a character image”, the 6th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 2004, vol. 1, IEEE, 2004.
Wausau Financial Systems, Understanding Image Quality & Usability Within a New Environment, 2006, 22 pgs.
Wausau, “Understanding Image Quality & Usability Within a New Environment”, copyright 2019, 1 pg.
Wells Fargo 2005 News Releases, “The New Wells Fargo Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries In The Age of Check 21”, San Francisco Mar. 28, 2005, www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005_check21Year=2005 (1 pg).
Wells Fargo Commercial, “Remote Deposit”, www.wellsfargo.com/com/treasury mgmtlreceivables/electronic/remotedeposit, Copyright 2008 (1 pg).
Wells Fargo's Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum and Order, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 7 pgs.
Wells Fargo's Objections To Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Aug. 12, 2019, 7 pgs.
White, J.M. et al., “Image Thresholding for Optical Character Recognition and Other Applications Requiring Character Image Extraction”, IBM J. Res. Development, Jul. 1983, vol. 27, No. 4 (12 pgs).
Whitney, Steve et al., “A Framework For Exchanging Image Returns”, dated Jul. 2001, 129 pgs.
Wikipedia ®, “Remote Deposit,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_deposit, 2007 (3 pgs).
Windowsfordevices.com, “Software lets camera phone users deposit checks, pay bills”, www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS3934956670.html, Jan. 29, 2008 (3 pgs).
Wolfe, Daniel, “Check Image Group Outlines Agenda,” American Banker, New York, N.Y.: Feb. 13, 2009, vol. 174, Iss. 30, p. 12. (2 pgs).
Woody Baird Associated Press, “Pastor's Wife got Scammed—She Apparently Fell for Overseas Money Scheme,” The Commercial Appeal, Jul. 1, 2006, p. A. 1.
X9.100-180, “The New ICL Standard is Published”, All My Papers, 2006, 3 pgs.
X9.37 Specifications \| X9Ware LLC, dated 2018, 3 pgs.
Yeo, L.H. et al., “Submission of transaction from mobile workstations in a cooperative multidatabase environment”, IEEE, 1994, (cited in IPR2020-00097, U.S. Pat. No. 7,885,880), 10 pgs.
Zandifar, A. et al., “A Video Based Interface To Textual Information For The Visually Impaired”, IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 1-5, 2002, 6 pgs.
Zandifar, A., “A Video-Based Framework for the Analysis of Presentations/Posters,” International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Feb. 2, 2005, 10 pages.
Zaw, Kyi Pyar and Zin Mar Kyu, “Character Extraction and Recognition for Myanmar Script Signboard Images using Block based Pixel Count and Chain Codes” 2018 IEEE/ACIS 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (CS), IEEE, 2018.
Zhang, C.Y., “Robust Estimation and Image Combining” Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ASP Conference Series, 1995 (5 pgs).
Zions Bancorporation, “Moneytech, the technology of money in our world: Remote Deposit,” http://www.bankjunior.com/pground/moneytech/remote_deposit.jsp, 2007 (2 pgs).
Bruno-Britz, Maria “Mitek Launches Mobile Phone Check Capture Solution,” Bank Systems and Technologies Information Week (Jan. 24, 2008).
V User Guide, https://www.lg.com/us/support/manualsdocuments?customerModelCode=% 20LGVX9800&csSalesCode=LGVX9800, select“VERISON(USA) en”; The V_UG_051125.pdf.
MING Phone User Manual, 2006.
Patel, Kunur, “How Mobile Technology is Changing Banking's Future” AdAge, Sep. 21, 2009, 4 pages.
Spencer, Harvey, “Controlling Image Quality at the Point of Capture” Check 21, Digital Check Corporation & HSA 2004.
Moseik, Celeste K., “Customer Adoption of Online Restaurant Services: A Multi-Channel Approach”, Order No. 1444649 University of Delaware, 2007, Ann Arbor: ProQuest., Web. Jan. 10, 2022 (Year: 2007).
Bieniecki, Wojciech et al. “Image Preprocessing for Improving OCR Accuracy”, Computer Engineering Department, Technical University of Lodz, al. Politechniki 11, Lodz Poland.
Shaikh, Aijaz Ahmed et al., “Auto Teller Machine (ATM) Fraud—Case Study of Commercial Bank in Pakistan”, Department of Business Administration, Sukkur Institute of Business Administration, Sukkur, Pakistan.
Tiwari, Rajnish et al., “Mobile Banking as Business Strategy”, IEEE Xplore, Jul. 2006.
Lyn C. Thomas, “A survey of credit and behavioural scoring: forecasting financial risk of lending to consumers”, International Journal of Forecasting, (Risk) (2000).
Non-Final Office Action issued on U.S. Appl. No. 14/293,159 dated Aug. 11, 2022.
Non-Final Office Action issued on U.S. Appl. No. 16/455,024 dated Sep. 7, 2022.
Non-Final Office Action issued on U.S. Appl. No. 17/071,678 dated Sep. 14, 2022.
Non-Final Office Action issued on U.S. Appl. No. 17/180,075 dated Oct. 4, 2022.
Non-Final Office Action issue on U.S. Appl. No. 17/511,822 dated Sep. 16, 2022.
Non-Final Office Action issued on U.S. Appl. No. 17/568,849 dated Oct. 4, 2022.
Yong Gu Ji et al., “A Usability Checklist for the Usability Evaluation of Mobile Phone User Interface”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(3), 207-231 (2006).
Printout of news article dated Feb. 13, 2008, announcing a Nokia phone providing audio cues for capturing a document image.
IPR Petition 2022-01593, Truist Bank v. United Services Automobile Association filed Oct. 11, 2022.
Final Written Decision, IPR2021-01070, dated Jan. 19, 2023.
Final Written Decision, IPR2021-01073, dated Jan. 19, 2023.
Publication of U.S. Appl. No. 60/727,533, filed Oct. 17, 2005, related to U.S. Appl. No. 60/727,533, filed Oct. 17, 2005.
Ans X9.100-160-1-2004, Part 1: Placement and Location of Magnetic Ink Printing (MICR), American National Standard for Financial Services, approved Oct. 15, 2004.
Clancy, Heather, “Turning cellphones into scanners”, The New York Times, Feb. 12, 2005: https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/12/busienss/worldbusiness/turning-cellphones-into-scanners.html.
Consumer Guide to Check 21 and Substitute Checks, The Federal Reserve Board, The Wayback Machine—Oct. 28, 2004: https://web.archive.org/web/20041102233724/http://www.federalreserve.gov.
Curtin, Denis P., A Short Course in Digital Photography Chapter 7 Graphic File Formats.
Dance, Christopher, “Mobile Document Imaging”, Xerox, Research Centre Europe, XRCE Image Processing Area, Nov. 2004.
Digital Photography Now, Nokia N73 Review, Oct. 28, 2006.
Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 229, Regulation CC: Docket No. R-1176, Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Final rule.
Financial Services Policy Committee, Federal Reserve Banks Plan Black-and-White Image Standard and Quality Check, May 18, 2004.
MICR-Line Issues Associated With The Check 21 Act and the Board's Proposed Rule, Prepared by Federal Reserve Board Staff, Apr. 27, 2004.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary Fifth Edition—Copyright 2002.
HTTP Over TLS, Network Working Group, May 2000, Memo.
Nokia N73—Full phone specifications.
Ranjan, Amit, “Using a Camera with Windows Mobile 5”, Jul. 21, 2006.
Reed, John, “FT.com site: Mobile users branch out”, ProQuest, Trade Journal, Oct. 6, 2005.
Weiqui Luo et al., “Robust Detection of Region-Duplication Forgery in Digital Image” Guoping Qui, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK—Jan. 2006.
Final Written Decision relating to U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, IPR2021-01070, dated Jan. 19, 2023.
Final Written Decision relating to U.S. Pat. No. 8,877,571, IPR2021-01073, dated Jan. 19, 2023.
Final Written Decision relating to U.S. Pat. No. 10,621,559, IPR2021-01077, dated Jan. 20, 2023.
IPR2023-00829 filed Apr. 13, 2023, Truist Bank vs. United Services Autombile Association, 97 pgs.
“Reserve Banks to Adopt DSTU X9.37-2003 Format for Check 21 Image Services,” Fed. Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Fin. Serv. Policy Comm., May 18, 2004.
“Camera Phone Shoot-Out”, Phone Scoop, Dec. 18, 2002.
Shirai, K. et al., “Removal of Background Patterns and Signatures for Magnetic Ink Character Recognition of Checks,” 2012 10th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, Gold Coast, QLD. Australia, 2012, pp. 190-194.
Ding, Y. et al., “Background removal for check processing using morphology in Two-and Three-Dimensional Vision Systems for Inspection, Control, and Metrology”. vol. 5606, pp. 19-26, SPIE 2004.
Haskell, B.G. et al, “Image and video coding-emerging standards and beyond,” in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 8 No. 7, pp. 814-837, Nov. 1998.

System, computing device, and method for document detection and deposit processing

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

CPC

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (1322)

Foreign Referenced Citations (21)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (494)