The present disclosure relates to the field of wireless communication, and more particularly, to a mechanism for enabling robust signal detection and service discovery in broadcast networks.
The broadcast spectrum is divided up into different frequencies and allocated among different broadcasters for various uses in different geographic regions. The frequencies of the spectrum are allocated based on licenses granted to the broadcasters. Based on the allocations, a broadcaster may be limited to broadcasting a specific type of content, such a television signal, on a certain frequency within a certain geographic radius. Broadcasting outside of an allocated spectrum could be a violation for the broadcaster.
If a broadcaster wishes to transmit another type of content within that geographic radius, the broadcaster may be required to obtain an additional spectrum license and in turn be allocated an additional frequency within that frequency. Similarly, if a broadcaster wishes to transmit content within another geographic radius, the broadcaster may be required to obtain an additional spectrum license for that region. Obtaining additional spectrum licenses, however, may be difficult, time consuming, expensive, and impractical.
In addition, a broadcaster may not always fully utilize an entire portion of spectrum for which it has been granted a license. This may create inefficiencies in the utilization of the broadcast spectrum.
Moreover, the anticipated use of the broadcast spectrum may be changing. For example, current broadcast television solutions are monolithic and designed for a primary singular service. However, broadcasters may anticipate providing multiple wireless-based types of content, in addition to broadcast television in the future, including mobile broadcasting and IoT services. In particular, there are many scenarios where a large number of devices may all wish to receive identical data from a common source beyond broadcast television. One such example is mobile communication services, where a large number of mobile communication devices in various geographic locations may all need to receive a common broadcast signal conveying the same content, such as a software update or an emergency alert, for example. In such scenarios, it is significantly more efficient to broadcast or multicast the data to such devices rather than individually signaling the same data to each device. Thus, a hybrid solution may be desirable.
To more efficiently utilize the broadcast spectrum, different types of content may be time-multiplexed together within a single RF channel. Further, different sets of transmitted content may need to be transmitted with different encoding and transmission parameters, either simultaneously, in a time division-multiplexed fashion (TDM), in a frequency division—multiplexed (FDM), layer division-multiplexed (LDM) or a combination. The amount of content to be transmitted may vary with time and/or frequency.
In addition, content with different quality levels (e.g. high definition video, standard definition video, etc.) may need to be transmitted to different groups of devices with different propagation channel characteristics and different receiving environments. In other scenarios, it may be desirable to transmit device-specific data to a particular device, and the parameters used to encode and transmit that data may depend upon the device's location and/or propagation channel conditions.
At the same time, the demand for high-speed wireless data continues to increase, and it is desirable to make the most efficient use possible of the available wireless resources (such as a certain portion of the wireless spectrum) on a potentially time-varying basis.
An example extensible communication system is described herein. The system includes a first module for receiving a root index value and for generating a constant amplitude zero auto-correlation sequence based on the root value. The system further includes a second module for receiving a seed value and for generating a Pseudo-Noise sequence based on the seed value. The system further includes a third module for modulating the constant amplitude zero auto-correlation sequence by the Pseudo-Noise sequence and for generating a complex sequence. The system further includes a fourth module for translating the complex sequence to a time domain sequence, wherein the fourth module applies a cyclic shift to the time domain sequence to obtain a shifted time domain sequence.
An example extensible communication method is described herein. The method comprises the step of receiving a root index value and generating a constant amplitude zero auto-correlation sequence based on the root value. The method further comprises the step of receiving a seed value and generating a Pseudo-Noise sequence based on the seed value. The method further comprises the step of modulating the constant amplitude zero auto-correlation sequence by the Pseudo-Noise sequence and generating a complex sequence. The method further comprises the step of translating the complex sequence to a time domain sequence and applying a cyclic shift to the time domain sequence to obtain a shifted time domain sequence.
In the accompanying drawings, structures are illustrated that, together with the detailed description provided below, describe exemplary embodiments of the claimed invention. Like elements are identified with the same reference numerals. It should be understood that elements shown as a single component may be replaced with multiple components, and elements shown as multiple components may be replaced with a single component. The drawings are not to scale and the proportion of certain elements may be exaggerated for the purpose of illustration.
Described herein is a robust and extensible signaling framework, and, in particular, a bootstrap signal designed to enable robust detection and service discovery, system synchronization, and receiver configuration. The bootstrap provides two primary functions: synchronization and the signaling to discover the waveform being emitted via low level signaling to start decoding a waveform that follows. It is a robust waveform that provides extensibility to evolve over time. In particular, the bootstrap signal works for current broadcasting system but also allows for support of new services, including mobile broadcasting and IoT services.
A robust signaling system enables a signal to be discovered in high noise, low ‘carrier to noise ratio’ (CNR), and high Doppler environments. It should be appreciated that it is possible that only the bootstrap signal may be robust, while the actual waveform following bootstrap may not be as robust. Having a robust bootstrap signal allows synchronization by receivers to achieve and maintain a lock to the signal they are picking up in less than ideal environments. When noise conditions worsen and the receiver can no longer discern the payload from noise, it may still remain locked to the channel through the bootstrap. When noise conditions improve, the receiver does not need to go through the entire re-acquisition process since it already knows where to find the channel.
With an extensible signaling system, many different waveforms can be signaled, one for each of the types of services that is going to be transmitted in the future. Thus, new waveforms that don't exist today that may need to be used can also be signaled through the bootstrap.
It should be appreciated that the following acronyms and abbreviations may be used herein:
The content 104 is time-multiplexed, at the gateway 108, into a single RF channel 110. The broadcast receivers 112A, 112B, and 112C (hereinafter broadcast receiver 112) are configured to identify and receive the broadcast signals 114 via the RF channel 110. It should be appreciated that although three different types of broadcast receivers 112 are illustrated (a laptop computer 112A, a mobile telephone 112B, and a television 112C), system 100 may include any suitable number and type of broadcast receivers 112.
A bootstrap (not shown) indicates, at a low level, the type or form of a signal 114 that is being transmitted during a particular time period, so that the broadcast receiver 112 can discover and identify the signal 114, which in to indicates how to receive the services that are available via that signal 114. Thus, the bootstrap is relied on as an integral part of every transmit frame to allow for sync/detection and system configuration. As will be described, the bootstrap design includes a flexible signaling approach to convey frame configuration and content control information to the broadcast receiver 112. The signal design describes the mechanism by which signal parameters are modulated on the physical medium. The signaling protocol describes the specific encoding used to communicate parameter selections governing the transmit frame configuration. This enables reliable service discovery while providing extensibility to accommodate evolving signaling needs from a common frame structure. Specifically, the design of the bootstrap enables universal signal discovery independent of channel bandwidth.
The bootstrap also enables reliable detection in the presence of a variety of channel impairments such as time dispersion and multipath fading, Doppler shift, and carrier frequency offset. In addition, multiple service contexts are accessible based on mode detection during signal discovery enabling broad flexibility in system configuration. The bootstrap also facilitates extensibility to accommodate ongoing evolution in service capability based on a hierarchical signaling structure. Thus, new signal types not yet conceived, could be provided by a content provider 102 and identified within a transmitted signal 114 through the use of a bootstrap signal. Moreover, reusable bit-fields interpreted based on the detected service mode/type enable bit-efficient signaling despite the level of extensibility afforded. In one example, the bootstrap is configured to be a robust signal and detectable even at low signal levels. As a result, individual signaling bits within the bootstrap may be comparatively expensive in terms of physical resources that they occupy for transmission. Thus, the bootstrap may be intended to signal only the minimum amount of information required for system discovery and for initial decoding of the following signal.
General Bootstrap Overview
Described herein is a bootstrap, independent of an implementation example to be described later. As will be described further, ATSC 3.0 is one example implementation of the bootstrap capability and sets certain constraints to general bootstrap capability. An appreciation of these general concepts in bootstrap construction will help those skilled in art see the wide applicability of this technology in future communications systems of various bandwidths and frequency bands in RF spectrum.
Described herein is the bootstrap signal. The baseband sampling rate (BSR) is denoted by the following equation:
BSR=Fs=(N+16)×(M) or Time domain: Ts=1/Fs Equ (1)
where Fs is the Frequency Sampling, N is the Operational Variable to scale over bandwidth chosen, and M is Factor (MHz) to Choose Bandwidth.
The OFDM subcarrier spacing (in Hz) is defined as:
ΔF=Fs/FFT(size) Equ (2)
Where the FTT size is some power of 2 (e.g. 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192 . . . ).
In one example (ATSC 3.0) design process for the 6 MHz broadcast television bandwidth in USA, the equation, M=0.384 is chosen because of an existing relationship to LTE (based on WCDMA). Other relationships may be chosen. Thus, in this one example:
Fs=(0+16)×(0.384 MHz)=6.144 MHz;
Fs=6.144 MHz, FFT(size)=2048; and
ΔF=6.144 MHz/2048=3000 Hz Equ (3)
A Zadoff Chu sequence length N(ZC) is then selected (based on a prime number) to be mapped over a portion of the FFT(size) to support the bandwidth chosen. Thus,
Bandwidth=ΔF×(N(ZC)+1); Equ (4)
wherein the NZC is mapped to center of FFT (1500 sub-carriers including DC) and zero padding is used on remaining sub-carriers. In the ATSC 3.0 example, N(ZC)=1499 was chosen. Thus,
Bandwidth=3000(Hz)×(1499+1)=4.5 MHz
As a result, in the example ATSC 3.0 implementation described, the design consumes a 4.5 MHz bandwidth and has ΔF=3000 Hz which will give adequate Doppler performance (MPH) for broadcast band in mobile environment.
It should be appreciated other selections for parameters in the above general equations could enable wider bandwidths or frequency bands (Doppler), etc. In particular, although the value (N) is specified in ATSC 3.0 as 0, the full range of (0-127) is available for N. In the example illustrated, N is constrained to N=0 to achieve 6 MHz. However, it should be appreciated that, by substituting N=127, a bandwidth greater than 50 MHz can be supported. This is illustrative of the extensibility of the bootstrap.
Referring again to
ZC Sequence=e−jπq[k(k+1)/N
It should be appreciated that another theoretical property of (ZC) is that different cyclically shifted versions of root sequence can be imposed on a signal and can result in ideal zero autocorrelation. A generated Zadoff-Chu sequence that has not been shifted is known as a “Root Sequence.” Referring again to
As a result of this basic design requirement, the need of a large number of cyclic shifts with theoretic ideal autocorrelation was foreseen, something not natural to (ZC) alone. Then, through simulation and experiments, it was discovered and developed that by introducing a Pseudo-Noise (PN) sequence, in addition to ZC, all cyclic shifts can be enabled to approach near theoretic ideal autocorrelation.
Referring again to
The signal is then sent to an IFFT module 212 and converted from frequency domain to the time domain. The signal then is processed in time domain. The signal exiting IFFT is termed “A” which then has pre-fix and post-fix sections derived from “A” known as “B” and “C”. The symbol #0 has a time sequence “CAB” while all other symbols have a time sequence of “BCA”. It should be appreciated that the purpose of this is to add robustness and discriminate symbol #0 which is used for synchronization and versioning.
The length of bootstrap symbols is defined by:
Tsymbol=[C+A+B]×Ts Equ (6)
In one example (ATSC 3.0), the symbol length is 500 s.
To enable capability to extend the number of symbols, a mechanism of inversion of (ZC) on the last symbol in bootstrap sequence is used, as illustrated in
It should be appreciated that the receiver will gracefully ignore a Major version (Root) that it doesn't understand. This ensures extensibility without disrupting legacy receivers in future. In fact, one such signaling method is provided by ATSC 3.0 to be discussed later and is illustrated by Table 2 herein.
It should be appreciated that having a flexible or variable sampling defined in the bootstrap offers flexibility previously unavailable. In particular, rather than designing a solution for a specific service having a fixed or defined sampling rate as a function of bandwidth, a flexible sampling rate enable scaling for a variety of different bandwidths in order to accommodate diverse services with different requirements and constraints. Thus, the same system for synchronization and discovery can be used for a large range of bandwidths and can serve a large band, since different sections of a band may be better suited for different types of services.
The bootstrap 602 may consist of a number of symbols. For example, the bootstrap 202 may begin with a synchronization symbol 606 positioned at the start of each waveform to enable service discovery, coarse synchronization, frequency offset estimation, and initial channel estimation. The remainder 608 of the bootstrap 602 may contain sufficient control signaling to permit the reception and decoding of the remainder of the signal waveform 114 to begin.
The bootstrap 602 is configured to exhibit flexibility, scalability, and extensibility. For example, the bootstrap 602 may implement versioning for increased flexibility. Specifically, bootstrap 602 design may enable a major version number (corresponding to a particular service type or mode) and a minor version (within a particular major version). In one example, the versioning may be signaled (as will be described) via appropriate selection of a Zadoff-Chu root (major version) a Pseudo-Noise sequence seed (minor version) used for generating the base encoding sequence for bootstrap symbol contents. The decoding of signaling fields within the bootstrap 602 can be performed with regard to the detected service version, enabling hierarchical signaling where each assigned bit-field is reusable and is configured based on the indicated service version. The syntax and semantics of signaling fields within the bootstrap 612 may be specified, for example, within standards to which the major and minor version refers.
In order to further exhibit scalability and extensibility, the number of bits signaled per bootstrap 602 symbol can be defined, up to a maximum, for a particular major/minor version. The maximum number of bits per symbol defined by the equation:
(Nbps=└log2(NFFT|CyclicShiftTol)┘) Equ (7)
where is dependent on the desired cyclic shift tolerance which in turn is dependent on expected channel deployment scenarios and environments. If available, additional new signaling bits can be added to existing symbols in a backward compatible manner without requiring a change to the service version.
As a result, the bootstrap 602 signal duration is extensible in whole symbol periods, with each new symbol carrying up to Nbps additional signaling bits. Bootstrap 602 signal capacity may thus be dynamically increased until field termination is reached.
It should be further appreciated that modulating a ZC sequence with a pseudo-noise sequence in particular, gives the waveform different characteristics that makes it easily discoverable. In particular, modulating with a PN sequence results in near ideal correlation with less uncertainty. Such a combination was discovered through simulation after testing many combinations of algorithms and sequences. In particular, modulating a ZC sequence with a PN sequence produced the unexpected result of producing a signal that is easy to correlate to with no spurious signals created during correlation. This leads to a signal which is easily discoverable, meaning a receiver may correlate with the signal even in high noise settings.
Bootstrap—Implementation (ATSC 3.0 Example)
Described herein is an example implementation of the example bootstrap 602. It should be appreciated that although the examples described herein may refer to a specific implementation of as bootstrap, it is contemplated that the bootstrap 602 will have broader applications beyond the example illustrated below.
Bootstrap Specification—Dimensions
In one example, the bootstrap 602 structure is intended to remain fixed even as version numbers and/or the other information signaled by the bootstrap 602 evolves. In one example, the bootstrap 602 uses a fixed sampling rate of 6.144 Msamples/second and a fixed bandwidth of 4.5 MHz, regardless of the channel bandwidth used for the remainder of the waveform 604. The time length of each sample is also fixed by the sampling rate. Thus,
fs=6.144 Ms/sec
Ts=1/fs
BWBootstrap=4.5 MHz Equ (8)
An FFT size of 2048 results in a subcarrier spacing of 3 kHz.
NFFT=2048
fΔ=fs/NFFT=3 kHz Equ (9)
In this example, each bootstrap 602 symbol has a time duration of ˜333.33 μs. When processed in time domain to be discussed later using (CAB or BCA) the exact length of Tsymbol is 500 s. The overall time duration of the bootstrap 602 depends on the number of bootstrap 602 symbols, which is specified as Ns. A fixed number of bootstrap 602 symbols shall not be assumed.
Tsymbol=500 μs Equ (10)
It should be appreciated that a 4.5 MHz bandwidth may be selected based on current industry consensus, which also covers 5 MHz as a lowest bandwidth in common use and smaller than 6 MHz broadcast in this example. Thus, the baseband sampling rate can be calculated using:
(N+16)×0.384 MHz=6.144 MS/sec. (N=0 bootstrap) Equ (11)
Selecting a 2048 FFT length, which has good gain, results in a Δf of 3 KHz which gives good Doppler performance. It should be appreciated that a similar system can be implemented for other sections of the band. For example, variation of the same formula, in which the formula and N value would be optimized for that specific bandwidth could be used for other bandwidths such as 20 MHz.
It should be appreciated that basing the BSR formula on a 0.384 MHz factor, which is related to LTE systems (and a relationship to WCDMA), a new system may be able to work off of oscillator(s) used for other implementations. In addition, all 3GPP LTE baseband sampling rates for all current bandwidths described in standards today can also be calculated from the formula by inserting value (N). Thus, adopting the formula allows for future versions of equipment that contain some sort variation of LTE variation to still work. However, it should be appreciated that the BSR formula may similarly be based on other suitable factors.
It should be further appreciated that although examples described herein utilize a selected FFT size of 2048, other suitable FFT sizes may similarly be used. A receiver must first synchronize and identify an incoming signal so that it can begin decoding its information. A longer signaling sequence however, such as an FFT size of 2048, has a higher gain and is therefore easier to discover since the amount of information the receiver has available to find, or correlate to, is larger.
In existing cellular communication, the gain may not be a factor since communication occurs in a unicast nature and primary synchronization signal (PSS) is frequently inserted for random access by multiple users. Moreover, broadcasters may not have been concerned about gain in the past since broadcast may have been generally intended for static receivers that were on high grounds. However, when broadcasting to mobile device or to locations with poor reception, higher gain may become more important. A mobile device, however, may not have an optimal antenna shape to rely on for gain and may not be ideally positioned for best reception and therefore mathematical gain may be relied on.
Therefore, longer signal lengths, such as the example FFT=2048, provides longer sequences to correlate to and therefore results in more robust reception. For example, with a longer signal, the bootstrap may be discoverable in underground locations, below the noise floor. In addition, longer signal lengths also enable more unique sequences. For example, each transmitter can be assigned unique sequence and receivers can then search for sequences independently. This information can be used, by Global Positioning System (GPS) systems for example, to calculate a position of the receiver using TDOA techniques, is not discussed herein.
It should be appreciated that, although other suitable signal lengths may be chosen, a signal length of 2048 has been identified herein in order to optimize performance. In particular, choosing a different signal length may result in tradeoffs between different parameters, including the amount of gain which could impact performance.
Bootstrap Specification—Frequency Domain Sequence
In one example, the Zadoff-Chu (ZC) sequence has length NZC=1499, where this is the largest prime number that results in a channel bandwidth no greater than 4.5 MHz with a subcarrier spacing of fΔ=3 kHz. The ZC sequence is parameterized by a root q, which corresponds to a major version number:
The use of a pseudo-noise sequence to modulate the ZC sequence has allowed for the relaxation of constrains on the ZC root. While previous signaling methods that utilized ZC (e.g. LTE Primary Synchronization Sequence) were limited to selecting prime roots to assure good autocorrelation properties, in this system, the PN modulation allows for good autocorrelation even when non-prime roots are selected for ZC. Having non-prime roots for ZC allows for the creation of more waveforms, allowing the system to signal more types of services, i.e. creating a more extensible system.
The PN sequence generator registers 802 are re-initialized with the initial state from the seed prior to the generation of the first symbol in a new bootstrap 602. The PN sequence generator 708 continues to sequence from one symbol to the next within a bootstrap 602 and is not re-initialized for successive symbols within the same bootstrap 602.
The output of the PN sequence generator 708 is defined as p(k) which will have a value of either 0 or 1. p(0) shall be equal to the PN sequence generator output after the PN sequence generator 708 has been initialized with the appropriate seed value and before any clocking of the shift register 802. A new output p(k) shall subsequently be generated every time the shift register 802 is clocked on position to the right. Thus, in one example, the generator polynomial 804 for the PN sequence generator 708 shall be defined as:
g={g1, . . . ,g0}={1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1} Equ (13)
where
p(x)=x16+x15+x14+x+1
The product of the ZC and the PN sequences has reflective symmetry about the DC subcarrier. The ZC sequence has a natural reflective symmetry about the DC subcarrier. A reflective symmetry of the PN sequence about the DC subcarrier is introduced by mirror-reflecting the PN sequence values assigned to subcarriers below the DC subcarrier to the subcarriers above the DC subcarrier. For example, as illustrated the PN sequence values at subcarriers −1 and +1 are identical, as are the PN sequence values at subcarriers −2 and +2. As a result, the product of the ZC and PN sequences also has reflective symmetry about the DC subcarrier.
It should be appreciated that the symmetry described herein enables a more robust signal, making it easier to discover. In particular, the symmetry acts as an additional aid for discovery (i.e. additional gain). This is an additional feature of the signal that the receiver can look for, making it easier to find. Thus, it is one of the elements that allows the bootstrap to be recognized even below the noise floor.
As the mapping 900 illustrates, the subcarrier values for the n-th symbol of the bootstrap (0≤n<Ns) may be expressed as:
with c(k) having either the value +1 or −1. It should be appreciated that the ZC sequence is the same for each symbol, while the PN sequence advances with each symbol.
In one example, the final symbol in the bootstrap is indicated by a phase inversion (i.e. a rotation of 180°) of the subcarrier values for that particular symbol. This bootstrap termination signaling enables extensibility by allowing the number of symbols in the bootstrap to be increased for additional signaling capacity in a backwards compatible manner without requiring the major or minor version numbers to be changed. The phase inversion simply involves multiplying each subcarrier value by ejπ=−1:
This phase inversion enables receivers to correctly determine the end point of the bootstrap. For example, a receiver may determine the endpoint of a bootstrap for a minor version that is later than the minor version for which the receiver was designed and that has been extended by one or more bootstrap symbols. As a result, receivers do not need to assume a fixed number of bootstrap symbols. In addition, receivers may ignore the signaling bit contents of a bootstrap symbol that the receiver has not been provisioned to decode but still detect the presence of the bootstrap symbol itself.
Once mapped, the frequency domain sequence is then translated to the time domain via a NFFT=2048 point IFFT:
Bootstrap Specification—Symbol Signaling
Information is signaled via the bootstrap symbols through the use of cyclic shifts in the time domain of the An(t) time domain sequence. This sequence has a length of NFFT=2048 and thus 2048 distinct cyclic shifts are possible (from 0 to 2047, inclusive). With 2048 possible cyclic shifts, up to log 2(2048)=11 log 2(2048)=11 bits can be signaled. It should be appreciate that not all of these bits will actually be used. In particular, Nb represents the number of signaling bits that are used for the n-th bootstrap symbol (1≤n<Ns), and bon, . . . bN
The number of active signaling bits in a received bootstrap symbol may be greater than the number of signaling bits Nbn expected by a receiver. To facilitate future signaling expansion while maintaining backwards compatibility, a receiver shall not assume that the number of active signaling bits in a received bootstrap symbol is no greater than the number of signaling bits Nbn expected by that receiver. For example, Nbn for one or more specific bootstrap symbols may be increased when defining a new minor version within the same major version in order to make use of previously unused signaling bits while still maintaining backward compatibility. Thus, a receiver provisioned to decode the signaling bits for a particular major/minor version may ignore any new additional signaling bits that may be used in a later minor version within the same major version.
It should be appreciated that, in the examples described herein, the distance between correlation peaks between a symbol's bootstrap in the time domain is what encodes signaling information. In particular, the symbol #0 is the reference point (absolute shift) and the distance between that and the subsequent peaks (relative to the first one) carries information. The meaning of that distance can be determined from a defined lookup table, for example. Thus, the receiver is not trying to decode bits but is instead trying to identify correlation peaks. Once the receiver finds a peak, it waits for the next one, and the time between those holds signaling information. This creates a more robust system since time difference between peaks is easier to discover in high noise conditions, even though using 256 cyclic shifts, for example, to represent 8 bits of binary information may be relatively expensive. Actual signaling for the payload following the bootstrap, however, may still include a modulation scheme with actual bits that carry information.
In one example, a cyclic shift is represented as {tilde over (M)}n (0≤{tilde over (M)}n<NFFT) for the nth bootstrap symbol (1≤n<Ns) relative to the cyclic shift for the previous bootstrap symbol. {tilde over (M)}n is calculated from the signaling bit values for the n-th bootstrap symbol using a Gray code method. {tilde over (M)}n is represented in binary form as a set of bits m10n m9n . . . m1n m0n. Each bit of {tilde over (M)}n be computed as follows:
where the summation of the signaling bits followed by the modulo operation effectively performs a logical exclusive OR operation on the signaling bits in question.
This equation ensures that the relative cyclic shift {tilde over (M)}n is calculated to provide the maximum tolerance to any errors at the receiver when estimating the relative cyclic shift for a received bootstrap symbol. If the number of valid signaling bits Nb for a specific bootstrap symbol is increased in a future minor version within the same major version, the equation also ensures that the relative cyclic shifts for that future minor version bootstrap symbol will be calculated in such a manner that will still allow a receiver provisioned for an earlier minor version to correctly decode the signaling bit values that it is provisioned to decode, and hence backward compatibility will be maintained.
It should be appreciated that in general, the expected robustness of signaling bit btn will be greater than that of bkn if i<k.
In one example, the first bootstrap symbol is used for initial time synchronization and signals the major and minor version numbers via the ZC-root and PN-seed parameters. This symbol does not signal any additional information and hence always has a cyclic shift of 0.
The differentially-encoded absolute cyclic shift, Mn (0≤Mn≤NFFT), applied to the nth bootstrap symbol is calculated by summing the absolute cyclic shift for bootstrap symbol n−1 and the relative cyclic shift for bootstrap symbol n, modulo the length of the time domain sequence:
The absolute cyclic shift is then applied to obtain the shifted time domain sequence from the output of the IFFT operation:
An(t)=Ãn((t+Mn)mod NFFT) Equ (19)
Bootstrap Specification—Time Domain Structure
Each bootstrap symbol is composed of three parts: A, B, and C, where each of these parts consists of a sequence of complex-valued time domain samples. Part A is derived as the IFFT of the frequency domain structure with an appropriate cyclic shift applied, while B and C are composed of samples taken from A with a frequency shift of ±fΔ (equal to the subcarrier spacing) and a possible phase shift of e−jπ introduced to the frequency domain sequences axed for calculating the samples of part B. Parts A, B, and C include NA=NFFT=2048, NB=504, and NC=520 samples, respectively. Each bootstrap symbol consequently contains NA+NB+NC=3072 samples for an equivalent time length of 500 s.
In one example, a time domain structure includes two variants: CAB and BCA. The initial symbol of the bootstrap (i.e. bootstrap symbol 0), provided for sync detection, employs the C-A-B variant. The remaining bootstrap symbols (i.e. bootstrap symbol n where 1≤n<Ns) conforms to the B-C-A variant up to and including the bootstrap symbol that indicates field termination.
It should be appreciated that repeating a portion of the bootstrap allows for improved initial synchronization and discovery since the receiver knows to expect this repetition in a particular order and there makes the signal easier to discover and lock onto, even in high noise conditions.
It should be appreciated that the samples for part B 1016 may be taken from slightly different sections of part A 1014 for each of the CAB structure 1010 and the BCA structure 1020.
Bootstrap Signal Structure
An example bootstrap signal structure is described herein. A signaling set or structure includes configuration parameter values, a list of control information fields, and an assignment of those values and fields to specific signaling bits. It should be appreciated that a bootstrap signal structure may take other suitable forms, different than the example described herein.
The example bootstrap signal structure described herein may apply when a major version number is equal to 0. The corresponding ZC sequence root (q) is 137. The base number of symbols (including the initial synchronization symbol) in the bootstrap shall be Ns=4. It should be appreciated that Ns=4 represents the minimum number of symbols that can be transmitted. Thus, to enable the transmission of additional signaling bits, Ns=4 represents the minimum number of symbols (but not necessarily the maximum) that shall be transmitted within a bootstrap signal.
In one example, the generator polynomial for the Pseudo-Noise sequence generator is defined as:
={g1, . . . ,g0}={1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1}=[16 15 14 10]
p(x)=x16+x15+x14+x+1 Equ (22)
and the initial register state for the Pseudo-Noise sequence generator is defined as:
rinit={rt-1, . . . ,r0}={0,0, . . . ,0,1} Equ (23)
In one example, the initial register state of the PN sequence generator for a selected bootstrap minor version within a given major version is set to a value from a predefined list of values in order to signal the corresponding minor version that is in use. Table 1 illustrates example initial register states of a PN sequence generator for respective minor versions.
The bootstrap signal structure may include additional signaling fields following the major and minor version signals. For example, the signal structure may include a wake up bit. This can be an emergency alert wake up bit, for example. This is a 1 bit field that is either on (1) or off (0).
The signal structure may further include a Minimum Time Interval to Next Frame of Same Major and Minor Version field. This is defined as the time period measured from the start of the bootstrap for frame A to the earliest possible occurrence of the start of the bootstrap for frame B. Bootstrap B is guaranteed to lie within the time window beginning at the signaled minimum time interval value ending at the next-higher minimum time interval value that could have been signaled. If the highest-possible minimum time interval value is signaled, then this time window is unterminated. An example signal mapping formulas can be defined as:
Thus, an example signaled value of X=10 would indicate that bootstrap B lies somewhere in a time window that begins 700 ms from the start of bootstrap A and ends 800 ms from the start of bootstrap A.
The quantity is signaled via a sliding scale with increasing granularities as the signaled minimum time interval value increases. X represents the 5-bit value that is signaled and T represents the minimum time interval in milliseconds to the next frame that matches the same version number as the current frame. Table 2 illustrates example values.
The signal structure may further include a System Bandwidth field. This field signals the system bandwidth used for the post-bootstrap portion of the current frame. Values include 00=6 MHz, 01=7 MHz, 10=8 MHz, 11=Greater than 8 MHz. It should be appreciated that the “greater than 8 MHz” option facilitates future operation using a system bandwidth greater than 8 MHz. Receivers that are not provisioned to handle a system bandwidth greater than 8 MHz could ignore frames where this field is equal to 11.
Table 3 illustrates bootstrap signaling fields are mapped to specific signaling bits and bootstrap symbols, in one example. The most significant to least significant bits of each signaling field are mapped to the specified signaling bits in the given order from left to right. It should be appreciated that bin refers to the ith signaling bit of the nth bootstrap symbol, and that bootstrap symbol 0 does not carry any specific signaling bits.
Any of the various embodiments described herein may be realized in any of various forms, e.g., as a computer-implemented method, as a computer-readable memory medium, as a computer system, etc. A system may be realized by one or more custom-designed hardware devices such as Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), by one or more programmable hardware elements such as Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), by one or more processors executing stored program instructions, or by any combination of the foregoing.
In some embodiments, a non-transitory computer-readable memory medium may be configured so that it stores program instructions and/or data, where the program instructions, if executed by a computer system, cause the computer system to perform a method, e.g., any of the method embodiments described herein, or, any combination of the method embodiments described herein, or, any subset of any of the method embodiments described herein, or, any combination of such subsets.
In some embodiments, a computer system may be configured to include a processor (or a set of processors) and a memory medium, where the memory medium stores program instructions, where the processor is configured to read and execute the program instructions from the memory medium, where the program instructions are executable to implement any of the various method embodiments described herein (or, any combination of the method embodiments described herein, or, any subset of any of the method embodiments described herein, or, any combination of such subsets). The computer system may be realized in any of various forms. For example, the computer system may be a personal computer (in any of its various realizations), a workstation, a computer on a card, an application-specific computer in a box, a server computer, a client computer, a hand-held device, a mobile device, a wearable computer, a sensing device, a television, a video acquisition device, a computer embedded in a living organism, etc. The computer system may include one or more display devices. Any of the various computational results disclosed herein may be displayed via a display device or otherwise presented as output via a user interface device.
To the extent that the term “includes” or “including” is used in the specification or the claims, it is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as that term is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “or” is employed (e.g., A or B) it is intended to mean “A or B or both.” When the applicants intend to indicate “only A or B but not both” then the term “only A or B but not both” will be employed. Thus, use of the term “or” herein is the inclusive, and not the exclusive use. See, Bryan A. Garner, A Dictionary of Modem Legal Usage 624 (2d. Ed. 1995). Also, to the extent that the terms “in” or “into” are used in the specification or the claims, it is intended to additionally mean “on” or “onto.” Furthermore, to the extent the term “connect” is used in the specification or claims, it is intended to mean not only “directly connected to,” but also “indirectly connected to” such as connected through another component or components.
While the present application has been illustrated by the description of embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the application, in its broader aspects, is not limited to the specific details, the representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the applicants general inventive concept.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/236,206 filed on Apr. 21, 2021, now pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/219,054 filed on Dec. 13, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,012,282, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/648,978 filed on Jul. 13, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,158,518, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/065,427 filed on Mar. 9, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,079,708, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/130,365 filed on Mar. 9, 2015, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6052411 | Mueller et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6289000 | Yonge, III | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6961388 | Ling et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7623467 | Sun et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7778151 | Bertrand et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7920884 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8223908 | Gaal et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8503485 | Malladi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8577299 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8619540 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8644397 | Gaal et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8804675 | Gutierrez et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9036567 | Krishnmoorthi et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9043687 | Ko et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9179440 | Gutierrez et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9253428 | Allison, III et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9258800 | Kwak et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9300327 | Ko et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9307273 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9363040 | Ko et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9369325 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9386562 | Gutierrez et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9762347 | Shelby et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10079708 | Simon et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10158518 | Simon et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10574494 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10630411 | Shelby et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10778484 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10833789 | Shelby et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11012282 | Simon et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11627030 | Simon et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
20020118727 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20060221810 | Vrcelj et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070183386 | Muharemovic et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080051125 | Muharemovic et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075184 | Muharemovic et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080095254 | Muharemovic | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101507 | Oketani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080168114 | Han et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080240285 | Han et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273582 | Gaal et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090073944 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090103651 | Lahtonen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090186625 | Qu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090245222 | Sampath et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323855 | Han et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325513 | Iwai et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100040129 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067461 | Kwak et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074343 | Gaal et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091904 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111224 | Lim et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100182898 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100220664 | Hooli et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290557 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309861 | Gorokhov et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110013718 | Ko et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019622 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110044401 | Ko et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110105135 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110182328 | Imamura et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110211488 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120008577 | Han et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120033647 | Moon et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057664 | Knutson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120163348 | Han et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120213176 | Kwak et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120213193 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120294273 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130003879 | Balleste et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016801 | Xia et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018934 | Kim et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044828 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130157667 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130208679 | Joung et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223389 | Papasakellariou et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130286996 | Takeda et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130322563 | Van Zelst et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336273 | Takeda et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140112274 | Moon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140140358 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140169488 | Varanese et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140211837 | Bakin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219329 | Seller et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233379 | Chu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233469 | Seo et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140269982 | Asjadi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286298 | Yoshimoto et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140321397 | Shen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323126 | Ro et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140362804 | Han et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006586 | Mourad et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036607 | Park et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150043491 | Eng et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049642 | Eng et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055727 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150181281 | Ko et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150195067 | Kim et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236884 | Suh et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150304070 | Baek et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304074 | Seo et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150350945 | Chae et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358106 | Limberg et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150365224 | Waheed et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160020884 | Chae et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160056910 | Shelby et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057504 | Shelby et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160065343 | Kim et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094895 | Stadelmeier et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094970 | Oh et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105223 | Baek et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119908 | Kwak et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160142898 | Poitau | May 2016 | A1 |
20160164541 | Ko et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160164637 | Suh et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165273 | Moon et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165274 | Moon et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173312 | Moon et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191288 | Baek et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160198217 | Ko et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160226689 | Kim | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160241358 | Ko et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160241365 | Bae et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160269980 | Simon et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160286558 | Chae et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170207873 | Shelby et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170207945 | Shelby et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170310523 | Simon et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20190116079 | Simon et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20210143929 | Shelby et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210258199 | Simon et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101166166 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101599946 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101601221 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101720531 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101854227 | Oct 2010 | CN |
101884202 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102413091 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102449920 | May 2012 | CN |
102932307 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103081425 | May 2013 | CN |
103281282 | Sep 2013 | CN |
103428143 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103532898 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103825859 | May 2014 | CN |
103888400 | Jun 2014 | CN |
104506271 | Apr 2015 | CN |
105007145 | Oct 2015 | CN |
105007146 | Oct 2015 | CN |
105024791 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105024952 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105024963 | Nov 2015 | CN |
105245479 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105282076 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105282078 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105323048 | Feb 2016 | CN |
105743624 | Jul 2016 | CN |
105991266 | Oct 2016 | CN |
105991495 | Oct 2016 | CN |
105991498 | Oct 2016 | CN |
105991500 | Oct 2016 | CN |
105991501 | Oct 2016 | CN |
105991502 | Oct 2016 | CN |
106797264 | May 2017 | CN |
2398200 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2 153 606 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2009-542040 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-536297 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2012-114835 | Jun 2012 | JP |
2013-219501 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2013-541898 | Nov 2013 | JP |
10-2007-0106913 | Nov 2007 | KR |
10-2009-0106412 | Oct 2009 | KR |
10-2011-0056302 | May 2011 | KR |
10-2013-0040956 | Apr 2013 | KR |
10-2015-0006319 | Jan 2015 | KR |
102113130 | May 2020 | KR |
201119272 | Jun 2011 | TW |
I465084 | Dec 2014 | TW |
WO 2007122828 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008044629 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008114983 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008152819 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2008155909 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009060183 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2011126246 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2015005656 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO-2015069092 | May 2015 | WO |
WO-2015072791 | May 2015 | WO |
WO-2015076638 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2014082679 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2016154386 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 202011011767.6, 2 pages, dated May 4, 2023, 4 pages with translation. |
A/321 Part 1: ATSC Candidate Standard: System Discovery and Signaling, pp. i-iv and 1-16, May 6, 2015. |
ATSC Standard: ATSC 3.0 System, Doc. A/300:219, Sep. 17, 2019, pp. i-v and 1-147. |
Ericsson, “Scheduling Request in E-UTRAN,” 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 #47bis, R1-070471, Agenda Item 6.9.1, Sorrento, Italy, pp. 1-11, Jan. 15-19, 2007. |
LG Electronics, “S-Sch sequence design,” 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #47bis, R1-070231, Agenda Item 6.5.2, Sorrento, Italy, pp. 1-10, Jan. 15-19, 2007. |
Lge et al., “Correction of PUCCH index generation formula,” 3GPP TSG-RAN Meeting #54, R1-082915, Current Version 8.3.0, Jeju, Island, South Korea, 2 pages, Aug. 18-22, 2008. |
Silva C., Eric M. et al., “Synchronization Algorithms based on Weighted CAZAC Preambles for OFDM Systems,” 2013 13th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), Sep. 4, 2013, pp. 192-197. |
Wang, Han et al., A Novel Synchronization Algorithm for OFDM Systems with Weighted CAZAC Sequence, Journal of Computational Information Systems, Binary Information Press, 2012, vol. 8, pp. 2275-2283, http://www.jofcis.com/publishedpapers/2012_8_6_2275_2283.pdf. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/046719; Date of mailing: Nov. 19, 2015. |
English Translation of First Official Action, dated Mar. 27, 2018, for Chinese Patent Application 201580045920.8, 9 pages. |
Search Report, dated Mar. 16, 2018, for Chinese Patent Application 201580045920.8, 2 pages. |
English Translation of Notice Of Reasons For Rejection, mailed Oct. 24, 2017, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-508042, 6 pages. |
English Translation of Notice Of Reasons For Rejection, dated May 10, 2018, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-508042, 3 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report, dated Mar. 20, 2018, for European Patent Application No. 15836979.3, 11 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report, dated Oct. 15, 2018, for European Patent Application No. 16762422.0, 8 pages. |
Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2018, for Canadian Patent Appl. No. 2957573. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2018, for Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201680014736.1. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US16/21547, filed Mar. 9, 2016, 6 pages, mailed May 27, 2016. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105007145 A, published Oct. 28, 2015, 25 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105007146 A, published Oct. 28, 2015, 25 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105024791 A, published Nov. 4, 2015, 21 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105024952 A, published Nov. 4, 2015, 32 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105024963 A, published Nov. 4, 2015, 35 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105245479 A, published Jan. 13, 2016, 40 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105282076 A, published Jan. 27, 2016, 31 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105282078 A, published Jan. 27, 2016, 43 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105323048 A, published Feb. 10, 2016, 39 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105743624 A, published Jul. 6, 2016, 54 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105991266 A, published Oct. 5, 2016, 44 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105991495 A, published Oct. 5, 2016, 32 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105991498 A, published Oct. 5, 2016, 93 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105991500 A, published Oct. 5, 2016, 76 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105991501 A, published Oct. 5, 2016, 80 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English translation for Chinese patent publication No. CN 105991502 A, published Oct. 5, 2016, 39 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English Translation of Chinese Patent Publication No. CN 101601221 A, published Dec. 9, 2009, 14 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
English Translation for Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2010-536297 A, published Nov. 25, 2010, 9 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com/patent/JP2010536297A/en. |
English Translation for Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2012-114835 A, published Jun. 14, 2012, 12 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com/patent/JP2012114835A/en. |
English Translation for Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2013-541898 A, published Nov. 14, 2013, 8 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com/patent/JP2013541898A/en. |
English Translation for Chinese Patent Publication No. CN 1038258598 A, published May 28, 2014, 16 pages, translated by Google at https://patents.google.com. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection, mailed Feb. 4, 2020, from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2018-215215, with English translation, 11 pages total. |
Decision to Grant a Patent, drafted Jan. 15, 2020, from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2017-542135, with English translation, 5 pages. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201910501171.5, 5 pages, dated Jun. 9, 2020. |
Search Report from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201910501171.5, 2 pages, dated Apr. 27, 2020. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201910879452.4, 10 pages, dated Sep. 1, 2020. |
Search Report from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201910879452.4, 2 pages, dated Jul. 20, 2020. |
Notification of the First Office Action, dated Jun. 9, 2020, for Chinese Patent Appl. No. 2019105011715, 14 pages (including translation). |
Preliminary Office Action, dated Jun. 23, 2020, for Brazilian Patent Appl. No. BR112017018486-9, 5 pages (including translation). |
First Examination Report, dated Jun. 30, 2020, for Indian Patent Appl. No. 201717009854, 7 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action, dated Sep. 1, 2020, for Chinese Patent Appl. No. 2019108794524, 23 pages (including translation). |
Decision of Rejection, mailed Sep. 16, 2020, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-215215, 7 pages (including translation). |
First Examination Report, dated Oct. 23, 2020, for Indian Patent Appl. No. 201717028323, 6 pages. |
Office Action, mailed Sep. 27, 2019, from Taiwanese Patent Appl. No. 105107248, 3 pages. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection, mailed Mar. 11, 2021, from KR Patent Appl. No. 10-2020-7008031, 9 pages including translation. |
Office Action of the Intellectual Property Office, Taiwan Patent Appl. No. 110117872, dated Oct. 29, 2021, 6 pages with translation. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 202011011767.6, 3 pages, dated Dec. 1, 2022. |
Search Report from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 202011011767.6, 2 pages, dated Nov. 18, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230269123 A1 | Aug 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62130365 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17236206 | Apr 2021 | US |
Child | 18192992 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16219054 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 17236206 | US | |
Parent | 15648978 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16219054 | US | |
Parent | 15065427 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 15648978 | US |