Patent Grant
11183023
This invention relates to the field of entertainment and more particularly to a system to administer massive multi-player games of skill for traditional gaming formats where the number of players who can typically play is limited.
Games of skill typically rely upon the knowledge and/or ability of the players in determining the outcome. However, almost all games of skill possess some level of randomness or chance.
A game of skill depends, at least somewhat, upon each player's skills, but being a game, there is still some level of randomness, otherwise, the most skillful player will always win. Typically, operators of games of skill establish rules and scoring criteria that are fair with completely objective standards that are outside the control of the players and the game operator.
Some games of skill, because of physical and practical limitations, only enable a relatively small number of players to play at any given time.
One example of a widely played game of skill of this type is poker. Millions of people play poker each week. Traditionally, poker is played in a table setting with a single deck of cards. A single deck of cards has 52 individual cards. In traditional formats of poker, each player will have a certain number of cards that are exclusive to them. As such, the number of people who can play in a single game of poker is limited. For example, in the poker game of Texas Hold'em, each player is dealt two cards face down, known as “hole cards”, and then five community cards are dealt face down, then exposed in three sequential stages (three first, then another one, and then the last one). Hole cards are exclusive to each player, whereas the community cards are not exclusive and are available to all players to incorporate into their hands. Each player seeks the best five card poker hand from any combination of the seven cards of the five community cards and their own two hole cards. Therefore, after accounting for the five community cards, a single game or table of Texas Hold'em can only accommodate 23 players at most (each player receiving two hole cards, or 46 cards hole cards total plus the five Community Cards, which totals 51 cards of the 52 cards in the deck).
A further physical limitation relates to the number of seats at a given table. Although up to 23 people could conceivably play Texas Hold'em at a single table, physically accommodating 23 people is highly-impracticable due to space limitations. This is not only true of Texas Hold'em when played with real cards in an actual physical location, but also when played online either through a browser or mobile interface because screen real estate is limited. As such, most operators of Texas Hold'em limit the number of players in a single game to ten or less at any given time.
Another practical limitation is time. Poker games, including Texas Hold'em, utilize what is commonly referred to as “table wagering” where wagering is performed sequentially by each player in various rounds. Table wagering can be complicated and time consuming. For example, Texas Hold'em has three stages when additional community cards are dealt or revealed to the players. In the first stage, commonly referred to as “the flop”, a series of three cards are revealed to the players. In the next stage, an additional single card, commonly referred to as “the turn” is dealt, and then in the third stage, a final card, commonly referred to as “the river” is dealt. Rounds of sequential betting take place before and after the flop and then after each subsequent stage. During each round of betting, players make wagering decisions sequentially and have the option to check, call, raise, or fold. Betting order typically flows clockwise around the table of play for at least one rotation. However, several full rotations might occur before a given round is concluded. Normally, players have a limited time to make their betting decisions (i.e. 30 seconds or less to submit a decision or a forced fold is imposed). A single round of wagering might last a single rotation and end in a matter of seconds, or multiple rotations might occur, which can take several minutes to conclude. When more players are playing in a given game, more sequential player decisions are required and the game will usually take much longer. At some point, the duration of a game becomes impracticable and certainly less enjoyable for the players. This is another reason why many operators limit the number of players in a single game to ten or less.
A final consideration relates to the way traditional poker games are scored and the number of players who win at the end of a given game. In Texas Hold'em, each player seeks the best five card poker hand from any combination of the seven cards of the five community cards and their own two hole cards. Traditionally, poker hands are measured based on a standard set of rules. For example, three-of-a-kind beats two of a kind, and a full house beats a flush, and so on. These rules provide an adequate level of granularity for games with a limited number of players; however, further granularity is needed for games where thousands or even hundreds of thousands of entrants are playing. In poker or Texas Hold'em, after the final round of table wagering has concluded, the remaining players reveal their hands and the player with the best hand wins the entire pot. Although this winner-takes-all formulation works well when the number of players of a given game is limited, it becomes less attractive as when larger numbers of people play. For example, if ten people play and there is one winner, the winning hand is in the top ten percent. However, if a thousand people play, and one person wins, that same winning hand represents 1/10th of one percent. Although the prize pool would be considerably larger, the odds of winning fall significantly leaving 999 players with no payout at all. For many players, this result would be less attractive.
What is needed are new game formats of traditional games, such as poker, that (1) enable larger numbers of players to play in a single game, (2) employ simpler betting mechanics, (3) can be played in shorter durations, (4) employ a scoring system that provides greater granularity and differentiation amongst the players, and (5) utilize payout schemes that are more appropriate for games with larger numbers of players where a greater number or percentage of players have the potential to win at the game's conclusion.
People are typically more likely to participate in games where their knowledge and skill gives them an edge, particularly when the winners of a given game have paid an entry fee to participate and/or could win money based on the outcome.
Additionally, people are more likely to participate in games of skill that enable more players to play, are easier to play, shorter in duration, offer a higher level of scoring differentiation and a greater chance of winning.
This is especially true for games that require an entry fee or wagering and offer a progressive prize pool because the potential for winning larger prizes increases with the number of players.
In one embodiment, a gaming system is disclosed including a server and a plurality of player client devices. Each player client device is associated with a player. There is a software representation of a deck of cards and the server randomly selects and removes a set of community cards from the deck of cards. The server requests a first wager from each player client device and each player client device that makes the first wager is declared as playing. For each player client device that is playing, the server randomly selects a non-exclusive set of hole cards from the deck of cards. After the server collects the first wager and adds the wager to a pot, the server displays the set of community cards on all player client devices that are playing and requests a second wager from each player client device that is playing. Until all hole cards are presented, for each player client device that is playing, the server presents a next subset of the hole cards, requests a subsequent wager from each player client device, for each player client device that makes the subsequent wager, the subsequent wager is added to the pot; and each player client device that does not make the subsequent wager is declared as not playing. After all hole cards are presented, one or more winners are declared based upon a rank of hands, the hands include the hole cards of each player and the community cards.
In another embodiment, a method of gaming by a set of players is disclosed including randomly selecting and removing a set of community cards from a deck of cards. Next, requesting a first wager from each player and each player making the first wager is added to the set of players that are in. For each player in the set of playing players that are in, randomly selecting a non-exclusive set of hole cards from the deck of cards then displaying the set of community cards to all players in the set of players that are in. Next, requesting a second wager from each player that is in the set of players that are in and until all hole cards are presented, for each player in the set of players that are in, presenting a next subset of the hole cards and requesting a subsequent wager from each player in the set of players that are in. Each player that does not make the subsequent wager is removed from the set of players that are in. After all hole cards are presented, the hand of each player in the set of players that are in is ranked, and one or more winners is/are declared based upon the rank. The hands include the hole cards of each player and the community cards.
In another embodiment, program instructions tangibly embodied in a non-transitory storage medium comprising at least one instruction configured to implement a system for gaming between a set of players is disclosed in which at least one instruction includes computer readable instructions executed by a processor causing the system for gaming to randomly select and remove a set of community cards from a deck of cards and to request a first wager from each player of the set of players. The computer readable instructions executed by the processor causing the system for gaming to add each player that makes the first wager to a set of in players. For each player in the set of in players, the computer readable instructions executed by the processor causing the system for gaming to randomly select a non-exclusive set of hole cards from the deck of cards and to assign that non-exclusive set of hole cards to the each player in the set of in players. Next, the computer readable instructions executed by the processor causing the system for gaming to display the set of community cards to all players in the set of in players and to request a second wager from each player that is in the set of in players. Until all hole cards are presented, for each player in the set of players that are in, the computer readable instructions executed by the processor causing the system for gaming to present a next subset of the hole cards and to request a subsequent wager from each player in the set of in players. The computer readable instructions executed by the processor causing the system for gaming to remove each player from the set of in players that does not make the subsequent wager and after all hole cards are presented, the computer readable instructions executed by the processor causing the system for gaming to rank a hand of each player in the set of in players, and to declare one or more winners based upon the rank, the hands comprising the hole cards of each player and the community cards.
In some embodiments, a game format for poker is disclosed where the number of players is theoretically unlimited; where staged wagering is employed as opposed to traditional table wagering; where an enhanced method for measuring player poker hands is employed; and where a method that enables a variety of payout schemes (other than just winner-takes-all) is utilized. First, players elect to enter the game, which, in some embodiments, is subject to an entry deadline. In some embodiments an entry fee or “ante” is required as a precondition to playing. Next, a sub-set of playing cards (the “community cards”) are randomly selected from a plurality of playing cards (the “deck”). The number of community cards may vary, but will typically range from two to five. Community Cards are then removed from the deck and displayed face down with the remaining cards in the deck constituting a second plurality of cards (the “unallocated deck”). The community cards are not revealed to the players at this time. Next, each player is randomly assigned a sub-set of playing cards (“hole cards”) from the unallocated deck. Any number of hole cards is assigned to each player, but this number is typically between two and five. The assignment of cards from the unallocated deck is not mutually exclusive. In other words, any number of players will each have the same card or set of cards as their hole cards. However, no single player will be allotted two of the same card. For example, a given player will not have two jacks of clubs in their hand, though it is anticipated that many jacks of clubs are allocated across several players. During play, the player's hole cards are revealed at various stages only to that player with no other player having visibility to that player's hole cards. Next, the community cards are exposed to all players and the first round of staged wagering is implemented whereby players are offered a limited time to elect and submit an additional wager of real or virtual currency to stay in the game. Otherwise, the player folds and exits the game. Once all players have made a declaration (or have folded by default due to the expiration of time), a portion of each player's hole cards are revealed and a subsequent round of staged wagering is implemented. This process continues for successive rounds until all of the player's hole cards have been revealed. After all hole cards have been revealed and a final round of staged wagering has concluded, the remaining players' hands are objectively measured, for example, using a scoring methodology that provides for greater granularity and differentiation than the traditional rules of poker as, for example, there will be multiple jacks of clubs, etc. Next each player's hand is ranked with the highest-ranking player(s) awarded a payout or a prize based on a pre-set schedule or formula that may include various formulations in addition the winner-takes-all formula employed in traditional poker. In some embodiments, payout is made by place (i.e. 1st wins X, 2nd wins Y . . . ), tier (1st through 10th wins X, 11th through 201th wins Y . . . ), or percentile (top 10% win X, >10% to 20% win Y . . . ).
In another embodiment, a gaming system is disclosed where the number of entrants is theoretically unlimited. This embodiment includes a server; where staged wagering is employed as opposed to traditional table wagering; where an enhanced method for measuring player poker hands is employed; and where a method that enables a variety of payout schemes (other than just winner-takes-all) is utilized. There are several player devices connected to the server. Through their devices, players access a user-interface and enter a game or contest. In some embodiments, players are required to pay an entry fee or “ante” as a precondition of play. The player devices then transmit player entries to the server where they are recorded. Once the entry deadline expires and all entries have been transmitted and recorded, the server initiates the game. First, the server randomly selects a sub-set of playing cards (the “community cards”) from a plurality of playing cards (the “deck”). The number of community cards is any number, typically ranging from two to five cards. The community cards are removed from the deck and displayed face down in the user-interface, with the remaining cards in the deck constituting a second plurality of cards (the “unallocated deck”). Next, the server randomly assigns each player a sub-set of playing cards (“hole cards”) from the unallocated deck. The number of hole cards assigned to each player can vary, but will typically be between two and five. The assignment of cards from the unallocated deck is not mutually exclusive and it is anticipated that multiple players will each have the same card or set of cards as their hold cards. However, no single player will be allotted two of the same card. The server then reveals to all players the community cards (e.g. turns face up). At this time, a player's hole cards are revealed sequentially intermixed with rounds of betting. Each player's hole cards are revealed only to that player with no other player having the ability to see other player's hole cards. Next, the server initiates the first round of staged wagering whereby players, through the user-interface, have a limited time to submit an additional wager of real or virtual currency and stay in the game or fold and exit the game. Player devices, through the user-interface, accept player submissions and then transmit the submissions to the server where they are recorded. Once all players have entered a submission (or have folded by default by failing to enter a submission before the expiration of the time limit), the server reveals a portion of the hole cards to each of the remaining players and a subsequent round of staged wagering is implemented. This process continues for successive rounds until all of the hole cards have been revealed. After all hole cards have been revealed and a final round of staged wagering has concluded, the server analyzes and objectively scores the hands of the remaining players using, for example, an enhanced method for measuring player poker hands to provide greater granularity and differentiation than provided for by the traditional rules of poker as there are many duplicate cards having the same value. The server then ranks the hands of the players and utilizes a payout engine whereby players with the highest-ranking hands are awarded a payout or a prize based on a pre-set schedule or formula that, in some embodiments, includes various formulations in addition the winner-takes-all formula employed in traditional poker. In some embodiments, the payout includes, but is not limited to, payout by place (i.e. 1st wins X, 2nd wins Y . . . ), tier (1st through 10th wins X, 11th through 201th wins Y . . . ), or percentile (top 10% win X, >10% to 20% win Y . . . ). In this, the betting, and hence, outcome of the game is influenced by the skill and knowledge of the users.
In one embodiment, a game format for poker is disclosed where the number of players is theoretically unlimited; where staged wagering is employed as opposed to traditional table wagering; where an enhanced method for measuring player poker hands is employed; and where a method that enables a variety of payout schemes (other than just winner-takes-all) is utilized. First, players elect to enter the game, which is anticipated to be subject to an entry deadline. In some embodiments, the players are required to pay an entry fee or “ante” as a precondition. Next, a sub-set of playing cards (the “community cards”) are randomly selected from a plurality of playing cards (the “deck”). Any number of community cards is anticipated, typically ranging from two to five cards. Community cards are then removed from the deck and displayed face down with the remaining cards in the deck constituting a second plurality of cards (the “unallocated deck”). The community cards are not revealed to the players at this time. Next, the each player is randomly assigned a sub-set of playing cards (“hole cards”) from the unallocated deck. The number of hole cards assigned to each player can vary, but will typically be between two and five. The assignment of cards from the unallocated deck is not mutually exclusive as multiple players will each have the same card or set of cards for their hole cards. However, no single player will be allotted two of the same card. For example, a player will not have two Jacks of Clubs in their hand.
Each player's hole cards are revealed sequentially intermixed with rounds of betting. Each player's hole cards are visible only to that player with no other player having the ability to see other player's hole cards. Staged wagering is implemented whereby players are offered a limited time to fold and exit the game or stay in the game by submitting an additional wager, if required. If a player does not affirmatively elect to fold or submit the additional requisite wager in time, then by default, when the time deadline has elapsed, in some embodiments, the requisite wager is automatically submitted and they stay in the game while in other embodiments, the player is automatically folded. Once all players have made a declaration (or have folded), a portion of the hole cards are revealed and a subsequent round of staged wagering is implemented. This process continues for successive rounds until all of the hole cards have been revealed. After all hole cards have been revealed and a final round of staged wagering has concluded, the remaining players' hands are objectively measured using, for example, a scoring methodology that provides for greater granularity and differentiation than the traditional rules of poker (as the hands will include multiples of each card of the unallocated deck). Next each player's hand is ranked with the highest-ranking player's hand awarded a payout or a prize based on a pre-set schedule or formula that, in some embodiments, includes various formulations in addition the winner-takes-all formula as employed in traditional poker. In some embodiments, payout is made by place (i.e. 1st wins X, 2nd wins Y . . . ), tier (1st through 10th wins X, 11th through 201th wins Y . . . ), or percentile (top 10% win X, >10% to 20% win Y . . . ).
In another embodiment, a gaming system is disclosed where the number of entrants is theoretically unlimited that includes a server; where staged wagering is employed as opposed to traditional table wagering; where an enhanced method for measuring player poker hands is employed; and where a method that enables a variety of payout schemes (other than just winner-takes-all) is utilized. There are several player devices connected to the server. Through their devices, players access a user-interface and enter a game or contest. Entry may or may not require an entry fee or “ante” as a precondition. The player devices then transmit player entries to the server where they are recorded. Once the entry deadline expires and all entries have been transmitted and recorded, the server initiates the game. First, the server randomly selects a sub-set of playing cards (the “community cards”) from a plurality of playing cards (the “deck”). The number of community cards may vary, but will typically range from two to five. The community cards are removed from the deck and displayed face down in the user-interface, with the remaining cards in the Deck constituting a second plurality of cards (the “unallocated deck”). Next, the server randomly assigns each player a sub-set of playing cards (“hole cards”) from the unallocated deck. The number of hole cards assigned to each player can vary, but will typically be between two and five. The assignment of cards from the unallocated deck is not mutually exclusive and multiple players are anticipated to have the same card or set of cards as their hole cards. However, no single player will be allotted two of the same card. The server then reveals to all players the community cards face up. A subset of each of the player's hole cards are revealed only to that player with no other player having the ability to see other player's hole cards. Next, the server initiates the first round of staged wagering whereby players, through the user-interface, have a limited amount of time to fold and exit the game, or stay in the game by submitting an additional wager, if required. In some embodiments, if a player does not affirmatively elect to fold before the time deadline or submit the additional requisite wager and stay in the game, then by default, when the time deadline has elapsed, the requisite wager is automatically submitted and they stay in the game. Player devices, through the user-interface, accept player submissions (affirmative or by default) and then transmit the submissions to the server where they are recorded. Once all players have entered a submission (or have folded by default by failing to enter a submission before the expiration of the time limit), the server reveals a portion of each of the remaining player's hole cards to those players only and a subsequent round of staged wagering is implemented. This process continues for successive rounds until all of the hole cards have been revealed. After all hole cards have been revealed and a final round of staged wagering has concluded, the server analyzes and objectively scores the hands of the remaining players, for example, using an enhanced method for measuring player poker hands to provide greater granularity and differentiation than provided for by the traditional rules of poker. The server then ranks the hands of the players and utilizes a payout engine whereby players with the highest-ranking hand(s) are awarded a payout or a prize based on a pre-set schedule or formula that may include various formulations such as the winner-takes-all formula employed in traditional poker or other payout formulae such as payout by place (i.e. 1st wins X, 2nd wins Y . . . ), tier (1st through 10th wins X, 11th through 201th wins Y . . . ), or percentile (top 10% win X, >10% to 20% win Y . . . ). In this, the outcome of the game is influenced by the betting skills and knowledge of the players.
The invention can be best understood by those having ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Throughout the following detailed description, the same reference numerals refer to the same elements in all figures.
Throughout this description, an example is made using a gaming system that is similar to the well-known game of poker. It is fully anticipated to implement the same or similar gaming system using solitaire, trivia, board games, etc., having multiple rounds of betting in which each player makes bets based upon how that player did during the current round, before executing the next round.
Referring to
Game details and settings are stored in a game storage area 42 that is accessible by the game server 40, such as, the deck, community cards, each player's hands, number of players, total amount in the pot, etc. User data storage that is accessible by the game server 40 includes data such as login credentials, preferences, available funds, name, picture, etc., are stored in a user data area 44.
Referring to
In general, the persistent storage 88 is used to store programs, executable code and data such as user financial data in a persistent manner. The removable storage 90 is used to load/store programs, executable code, images and data onto the persistent storage 88.
These peripherals are examples of persistent storage 88 and other examples of persistent storage devices 88 include core memory, FRAM, flash memory, etc. Other examples of removable media storage 90 include CDRW, DVD, DVD writeable, Blu-ray, SD cards, other removable flash media, floppy disk, etc. In some embodiments, other devices are connected to the system through the system bus 82 or with other input-output connections/arrangements as known in the industry. Examples of these devices include printers; graphics tablets; joysticks; and communications adapters such as modems and Ethernet adapters.
The network interface 80 connects the computer-based system to the network 10 through a link 78 which is, preferably, a high speed link such as a cable broadband connection, a Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) broadband connection, fiber optics, a T1 line, or a T3 line.
The server 50 maintains a representation of a deck of cards 45 (e.g. a set of cards from a standard poker deck, represented electronically) and during a game, software running on the server 50 randomly selects the community cards 132 from the deck of cards 45, eliminating the community cards 132 from the deck of cards 45. Then, the software running on the server 50 randomly selects each player's hole cards 130 from the remaining cards in the deck of cards 45. As the game progresses, the server 50 presents user interfaces a described later showing the community cards 132, collects bets from the player client devices 20, maintains the pot, etc. As each round of the game is made, the software running on the server 50 delivers one or more of the player's hole cards 130 to the player client devices 20 for display to the player for making decisions as to whether to remain in the game (pay more) or fold, etc.
The player's current score 120 is displayed, which is zero since the game has yet to start. The player's current rank 126 is displayed, which shows as “N/A”, again because the game has yet to start. The player's best hand 124 is displayed, which will be the best five card combination of their hole cards when combined with the visible community cards, again, no hand since the game has not commenced. Also, a projected payout table 128 is shown that displays the projected payouts based on the size of the pot 100, the number of players who played the game and the number of players that are currently in the game 102. As such, the projected payout table 128 is shown representing a pot of $260, as 260 players were in the game at the beginning of the game.
There are no changes yet to the player's current score 120, the player's current rank 126 and the player's best hand 124 as the player does not yet see any of their hole cards 130. Now, the projected payout table 128 reflects a payout schedule based on a pot 100 of $660, 260 players at the start of the game and currently 200 players still in the game (e.g. 260*$1+200*$2=$660). All of the hole cards 130 are shown face down. The three community cards 132 are shown face up to all players.
The player's current score 120 is now 1,323 based upon five cards (the three community cards 132 and the two hole cards 130). The player's current rank 126 remains as “N/A” and the player's best hand 124 at this time now shows the player's best hand combination from the five visible cards (e.g., a pair of kings, A, 10, 9 high). The projected payout table 128 reflects a payout schedule based on a pot 100 that is now $980. The hole cards 130 shows the faces of the first two hole cards 130 with the other two hole cards 130 remaining face down.
The player's current score 120 is now 1,325 based upon six cards (the three hold cards and the three community cards). The player's current rank 126 remains as “N/A” and the player's best hand 124 at this time now shows the player's best hand combination from the five visible cards (e.g., a pair of kings, A, 10, 9 high). The projected payout table 128 reflects a payout schedule based on a pot 100 that is now $1,180. The hole cards 130 shows the faces of the first three hole cards 130 with the final hole card 130 remaining face down.
The player's current score 120 is now 8675 based upon seven cards (the three community cards 132 and the four hole cards 130). The player's current rank 126 remains as “N/A” and the player's best hand 124 at this time now shows the player's best hand combination from the seven cards (e.g., three kings, A, 10 high). The projected payout table 128 reflects a payout schedule based on a pot 100 that is now $1,280. The faces of the all four hole cards 130 are shown.
The player's current score 120 is 8675 based upon seven cards (the three community cards 132 and the four hole cards 130). The player's current rank 126 now shows their rank as fifth (e.g. three kings tanks as fifth out of all of the remaining players) and the player's best hand 124 at this time now shows the player's best hand combination from the five visible cards (e.g., three kings, A, 10 high). The projected payout table 128 reflects a payout schedule based on a pot 100 of $1,280. The faces of all hole cards 130 are shown to the player. The amount won 125 by the player 142 is shown based on player's current score 120 (e.g. 8,675) and the player's current rank 126 (e.g. fifth) dividing a portion of the pot 100 (e.g. the pot 100 minus a fixed amount or percentage retained by the house) between some number of the highest ranking players (in this example, 50).
It is fully anticipated to provide different variations of the gaming system with more or less rounds of betting. For example, in some embodiments, betting is performed only after the player sees one or more of the player's hole cards 130. In some embodiments, the bet changes for each round, increasing or decreasing. In some embodiments, there are more or less hole cards 130 and the hole cards are exposed in the same or different sequences such as one hole card 130 at a time; two hole cards 130, one and one; three hole cards 130, one and one, etc. In some embodiments, there are more or less community cards 132, for example, two community cards 132 or four community cards 132.
In general, ranking of hands in poker is well known (e.g. a royal flush, a straight flush, four of a kind, a full-house . . . ) and is generally ranked between the best five cards (e.g. a pair of aces, king, ten, three high). As the disclosed system is intended for a large number of concurrent players, it is anticipated that more granularity will be needed to break ties, as, for example, it is possible that several players have the same best five cards (e.g. four kings, ace high). In such, it is anticipated to utilize all cards (e.g. four hole cards and three community cards) and, therefore, the hand four kings, ace, seven, four will beat the hand four kings, ace, seven two. In some embodiments, it is anticipated that suits will be given differentiating value (e.g. spades highest, then hearts, diamonds, and clubs). With such, if two hands have the same run (A, K, Q, J, 10), then the hand with the ace of spades will beat the hand with the ace of hearts. In some embodiments, a combination of both the suit and more than five cards is considered in ranking the hands.
Although the above examples describe an initial showing of the community cards followed by sequential betting and showing of a player's hole cards, it is equally anticipated that there be an initial showing of the player's hole cards (the player is only able to see their own hole cards) along with sequential betting and showing of the community cards.
Equivalent elements can be substituted for the ones set forth above such that they perform in substantially the same manner in substantially the same way for achieving substantially the same result.
It is believed that the system and method as described and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the foregoing description. It is also believed that it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the components thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form herein before described being merely exemplary and explanatory embodiment thereof. It is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 62/664,347 filed on Apr. 30, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020185816 | Moody et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20050032563 | Sines | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050040601 | Yoseloff et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20090250875 | Matanky | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20140087804 | Snow | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140357335 | Baker | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20180158285 | Mahasuverachai | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2008021264 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190333337 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62664347 | Apr 2018 | US |
