Patent Grant
10940555
Devices, systems, and methods consistent with the invention relate to welding work cells.
In the related art, work cells are used to produce welds or welded parts. There are at least two broad categories of work cells, including robotic work cells and semi-automatic work cells.
In robotic work cells, the scheduling and performing of welding operations is largely automated, with little operator involvement. Thus, these cells generally have a relatively low labor cost and a relatively high productivity. However, their repeating operations cannot easily adapt to varying welding conditions and/or sequences.
In contrast, semi-automatic work cells (i.e., work cells involving at least some operator welding) generally provide less automation vis-à-vis robotic work cells, and accordingly have a relatively higher labor cost and a relatively lower productivity. Nevertheless, there are many instances where using a semi-automatic welding work cell can actually be advantageous over robotic work cells. For example, a semi-automatic welding work cell can more easily adapt to varying welding conditions and/or sequences.
Unfortunately, when welding more complex assemblies in related art semi-automatic work cells, multiple different welding schedules are often required for different types of welds on different parts of an assembly. In many systems, when a different welding schedule must be utilized, the operator is required to stop welding operations and manually adjust the output of the semi-automatic equipment according to the new schedule. In some other systems, this manual adjustment is eliminated by storing particular schedules in the work cell. Nevertheless, even in such systems, the operator still needs to cease welding operations and push a button to select the new welding schedule before he may continue welding.
Neither of these practices for setting a different welding schedule is particularly efficient. Thus, in practice, the number of welding schedules used in a semi-automatic work cell is often reduced in order to eliminate the need for constant adjustment of the output of the semi-automatic equipment. While this reduction of welding schedules makes the overall operation easier for the welder, the forced simplification of this approach can lead to reduced productivity and lower overall quality.
Additionally, when abiding by strict quality control specifications, it is sometimes necessary to perform welds in a specific sequence, verify that each weld is performed with a given set of conditions, and monitor the output of the equipment during the welding operations. In a robotic work cell, these requirements are easily fulfilled. However, in a semi-automatic work cell, these requirements are susceptible to human error, since the operator must keep track of all of these aspects in addition to performing the welding operations themselves.
An illustrative example of the above problems is shown in the related art semi-automatic welding method diagrammatically represented in
Clearly, the method shown in
The above problems demand an improvement in the related art system.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a welding system is provided that includes a first component that is configured to identify an operator within a welding work cell to perform a first welding procedure on a workpiece and a second welding procedure on the workpiece. In the embodiment, the welding system further includes a welding job sequencer component that is configured to select one or more welding sequences based on the identification of the operator, wherein the welding sequence defines at least a parameter and a welding schedule for the first welding procedure to create a first weld on the workpiece and the second welding procedure to create a second weld on the workpiece. Within the embodiment, the welding job sequencer component is further configured to utilize the welding sequence in the welding work cell to facilitate performing the first welding procedure and the second welding procedure for the identified operator.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided that includes at least the following steps: receiving an input from an operator, the input is a portion of biometric data of the operator; verifying an identity of the operator by comparing the input to a system authenticated input for the user; identifying a welding sequence the operator is authorized to perform, wherein the welding sequence defines a first welding procedure that includes a first parameter to create a first weld on a workpiece and a second welding procedure that includes a second parameter to create a second weld on the workpiece; monitoring at least one fixture for a workpiece within the welding work cell; verifying a location of the at least one fixture for the workpiece based on a location indicated in the welding sequence; and utilizing the welding sequence to automatically modify a welding equipment within the welding work cell without intervention from the operator creating at least one of the first weld or the second weld.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a welding system is provided that includes at least the following: means for receiving an input from an operator, the input is a portion of biometric data of the operator; means for verifying an identity of the operator by comparing the input to a system authenticated input for the user; means for receiving a wireless signal from a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tag that is affixed to a workpiece, wherein the wireless signal includes a portion of data that is used to identify a welding sequence for the workpiece; means for identifying the welding sequence the operator is to perform based on the wireless signal, wherein the welding sequence defines a one or more welding procedures that includes one or more parameters to create one or more welds on the workpiece; means for monitoring at least one fixture for a workpiece within the welding work cell; means for verifying a location of the at least one fixture for the workpiece based on a location indicated in the welding sequence; and means for employing the welding sequence for the welding work cell to perform one or more welds to assemble the workpiece by automatically adjusting a setting on a welding equipment within the welding work cell.
These and other objects of this invention will be evident when viewed in light of the drawings, detailed description and appended claims.
The invention may take physical form in certain parts and arrangements of parts, a preferred embodiment of which will be described in detail in the specification and illustrated in the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and wherein:
Embodiments of the invention relate to methods and systems that relate to evaluating one or more conditions or preliminary weld condition (e.g., pre-weld condition) related to a welding system and/or method that utilizes a welding sequence to perform two or more welds with respective welding schedules. In an embodiment, an operator registration is provided that verifies the operator and identifies welding sequences to which the operator is authorized (e.g., trained, experienced, and the like) to perform. In another embodiment, one or more fixture locations are monitored to determine whether a workpiece is accurately configured prior to a welding operation. In still another embodiment, locations on a workpiece can be displayed to assist an operator in performing two or more welds utilizing a welding sequence. Moreover, a wireless system communications a data signal to a welding work cell in which such data is used to identify a welding sequence.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a semi-automatic welding work cell including a welding job sequencer that automatically selects a welding schedule for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of welding in a semi-automatic work cell, including automatically selecting a welding schedule for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a welding production line including at least one semi-automatic welding work cell, where the semi-automatic work cell includes a welding job sequencer that automatically selects a welding schedule for use by an operator therein.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of monitoring a welding production line, including automatically selecting a welding schedule for use by an operator in a semi-automatic welding work cell.
The term “component” as used herein can be defined as a portion of hardware, a portion of software, or a combination thereof. A portion of hardware can include at least a processor and a portion of memory, wherein the memory includes an instruction to execute.
The best mode for carrying out the invention will now be described for the purposes of illustrating the best mode known to the applicant at the time of the filing of this patent application. The examples and figures are illustrative only and not meant to limit the invention, which is measured by the scope and spirit of the claims. Referring now to the drawings, wherein the showings are for the purpose of illustrating an exemplary embodiment of the invention only and not for the purpose of limiting same,
More specifically, in an exemplary embodiment, the welding job sequencer automatically selects and implements a function of the welding work cell. An example of such a function includes a particular weld schedule to be used with the semi-automatic work cell. In other words, the welding job sequencer may select a weld schedule to be used for a particular weld, and modify the settings of the semi-automatic work cell in accordance with the selected weld schedule, automatically for the operator (i.e., without the operator's specific intervention).
Additionally, in the exemplary embodiment, the welding job sequencer may automatically indicate a sequence of operations that the operator should follow to create a final welded assembly. In conjunction with the automatic selection of welding schedules, this indicated sequence allows an operator to follow the sequence to create a final welded part, without having to spend time adjusting, selecting, or reviewing each individual weld schedule and/or sequence.
Accordingly, since the welding job sequencer sets up the welding equipment and organizes the workflow, and since the operator only performs the welding operations themselves, the chance for error in the welding operation is greatly reduced, and productivity and quality are improved.
The exemplary embodiment is diagrammatically represented in
Accordingly, as noted above, the sequencing and scheduling of welding operations is completed by the sequencer, and frees the operator to focus on performing welds according to instruction.
The welding job sequencer may select and implement a new function, such as the selection and implementation of weld schedules A, B and C shown in
Parameters of the selected weld schedule may include such variables as welding process, wire type, wire size, WFS, volts, trim, which wire feeder to use, or which feed head to use, but are not limited thereto.
While the above description focuses on the selection of a weld schedule as a function which is automatically selected and implemented, the welding job sequencer is not limited to using only this function.
For example, another possible function that may be selected and implemented by the welding job sequencer is a selection of one of multiple wire feeders on a single power source in accordance with the weld schedule. This function provides an even greater variability in welding jobs capable of being performed by the operator in the semi-automatic work cell, since different wire feeders can provide a great variance of, for example, wire sizes and types.
Another example of a function compatible with the welding job sequencer is a Quality Check function. This function performs a quality check of the weld (either during welding or after the weld is completed) before allowing the job sequence to continue. The quality check can monitor various welding parameters and can pause the welding operation and alert the operator if an abnormality is detected. An example of a welding parameter measurable by this function would be arc data.
Another example of such a function would be a Repeat function. This function would instruct the operator to repeat a particular weld or weld sequence. An example of the use of this function includes when the Quality Check function shows an abnormality, or when multiple instances of the same weld are required.
Another example of such a function would be a Notify Welder function, which communicates information to the welder. This function would display information, give an audible signal, or communicate with the welder by some other means. Examples of use of this function include an indication to the operator that he is free to begin welding, or an indication that the operator should check some portion of the welded part for quality purposes.
Another example of such a function would be a Enter Job Information function. This function will require the welder to enter information, such as the part serial number, a personal ID number, or other special conditions before the job sequencer can continue. This information could also be read from a part or inventory tag itself through Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), bar code scanning, or the like. The welding job sequencer could then utilize the entered information for the welding operations. An example of the use of this function would be as a predicate to the entire welding operation, so as to indicate to the welding job sequencer which schedules and/or sequences should be selected.
A further example of such a function would be a Job Report function. This function will create a report on the welding job, which could include information such as: the number of welds performed, total and individual arc timing, sequence interruptions, errors, faults, wire usage, arc data, and the like. An example of the use of this function would be to report to a manufacturing quality department on the efficiency and quality of the welding processes.
A still further example of such a function would be a System Check function. This function will establish whether the welding job can continue, and could monitor such parameters as: wire supply, gas supply, time left in the shift (as compared to the required time to finish the job), and the like. The function could then determine whether the parameters indicate that there is enough time and/or material for the welding job to continue. This function would prevent down-time due to material depletion, and would prevent work-in-process assemblies from being delayed, which can lead to quality problems due to thermal and scheduling issues.
Further, as mentioned above, the welding job sequencer may select and implement a new function, based upon various variables or inputs. These variables and inputs are not particularly limited, and can even be another function. For example, another function compatible with the welding job sequencer is a Perform Welding Operation function. This function is designed to detect the actual welding performed by the operator, and to report that welding so that the welding job sequencer can determine whether to proceed with further operations. For example, this function can operate by starting when the operator pulls the trigger to start the welding operation, and finishing when the operator releases the trigger after the welding is complete, or after a predetermined period of time after it starts. This function could end when the trigger is released or it could be configured to automatically turn off after a period of time, a quantity of wire, or an amount of energy is delivered. This function may be used to determine when to select a new function, such as a new weld schedule, as discussed above.
Still further, various semi-automatic and/or robotic work cells can be integrated together on a single network, and the sequencing of welding steps at a single work-cell can be fully integrated into a complete production schedule, which itself can be modified as needed to track variations in the production schedule. Sequencing and/or scheduling information can also be stored in a database, be stored by date as archival information, and be accessed to provide various production reports
In an embodiment, a semi-automatic welding work cell for welding an assembly defined by a plurality of welds can be provided, the plurality of welds being defined by at least two weld schedules can include welding equipment for use by a welding operator to perform said plurality of welds and complete the assembly with said welding equipment having a plurality of functions. In the embodiment, the work cell can include a welding job sequencer that automatically selects a welding schedule for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can select the welding schedule according to an elapsed time. In an embodiment, the welding job sequencer can detect when the operator is conducting a welding operation, and selects the welding schedule based upon that detection. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can detect when the operator is conducting a welding operation, and the welding job sequencer selects the welding schedule according to an amount of welding wire supplied for the welding operation. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can detect when the operator is conducting a welding operation, and the welding job sequencer selects the welding schedule according to an amount of energy supplied for the welding operation. In the embodiment, the welding schedule includes information about at least one of a welding process, wire type, wire size, WFS, volts, trim, wire feeder to use, or feed head to use.
In an embodiment, the welding work cell can include the welding job sequencer which select and implements at least one of a plurality of functions to define at least a first weld schedule and a second weld schedule from the at least two weld schedules so as to organize a workflow for creating the welded assembly and indicate to the welding operator a sequence of working operations for completing the assembly. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can automatically modify the welding equipment in accordance with the workflow and sequence of the welding operations without the welding operator intervening.
In the embodiment, the second weld schedule is defined according to an elapsed time of the first weld schedule. In the embodiment, the at least one function detects completion of said first weld schedule by said operator and automatically changes from said first weld schedule to said second weld schedule. In the embodiment, at least one function detects when the operator is conducting said first weld schedule, and said second weld schedule is defined according to an amount of welding wire supplied for said first weld schedule. In the embodiment, at least one function detects when the operator is conducting said first weld schedule, and said second weld schedule is defined according to an amount of energy supplied for said first weld schedule. In the embodiment, the at least one first weld set up parameter and said at least one second weld set up parameter comprise at least one of a welding process, wire type, wire size, WFS, volts, trim, wire feeder to use, or feed head to use. In the embodiment, at least one first weld set up parameter and said at least one second weld set up parameter comprise a feeder for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, at least one function monitors quality measurables of said weld assembly, wherein the quality measureables comprise at least information about an arc used to form the weld created by the operator In the embodiment, at least one function indicates information to the operator in the semiautomatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, at least one function accepts job information comprising at least a part ID number, operator ID number, or welding instructions. In the embodiment, at least one function produces a job report comprising at least one of a number of welds preformed, total arc time, individual arc time, sequence interruptions, errors, faults, wire usage, arc data. In the embodiment, at least one function includes a system check of said cell, the system check comprising at least a detection of wire supply, gas supply, and time.
In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can select a welding sequence for use by the operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can indicate the selected welding sequence to the operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can select a wire feeder for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can monitor quality measurables of a weld created by the operator, wherein the quality measureables comprise at least information about an arc used to form the weld created by the operator. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can indicate information to the operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can accept job information comprising at least a part ID number, operator ID number, or welding instructions. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can produce a job report comprising at least one of a number of welds preformed, total arc time, individual arc time, sequence interruptions, errors, faults, wire usage, arc data. In the embodiment, the welding job sequencer can perform a system check comprising at least a detection of wire supply, gas supply, and time.
In an embodiment, a method of welding in a semi-automatic work cell can be provided that includes automatically selecting a welding schedule for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the automatic selection can be performed after an elapsed time. In the embodiment, the method can include detecting when the operator is conducting a welding operation, wherein the automatic selection is performed based upon that detection. In the embodiment, the method can include detecting when the operator is conducting a welding operation, wherein the automatic selection is performed according to an amount of welding wire supplied for the welding operation. In the embodiment, the method can include detecting when the operator is conducting a welding operation, wherein the automatic selection is performed according to an amount of energy supplied for the welding operation. In the embodiment, the welding schedule can include information about at least one of a welding process, wire type, wire size, WFS, volts, trim, wire feeder to use, or feed head to use.
In the embodiment, the method can include selecting a welding sequence for use by the operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the method can include indicating the selected welding sequence to the operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the method can include selecting a wire feeder for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the method can include monitoring quality measurables of a weld created by the operator, wherein the quality measureables comprise at least information about an arc used to form the weld created by the operator. In the embodiment, the method can include indicating information to the operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the method can include accepting job information comprising at least a part ID number, operator ID number, or welding instructions. In the embodiment, the method can include producing a job report comprising at least one of a number of welds performed, total arc time, individual arc time, sequence interruptions, errors, faults, wire usage, arc data. In the embodiment, the method can include performing a system check comprising at least a detection of wire supply, gas supply, and time.
In an embodiment, a welding production line is provided with at least one semi-automatic welding work cell, wherein the semi-automatic work cell that includes a welding job sequencer that automatically selects a welding schedule for use by an operator therein. In the embodiment, the welding production line includes a monitoring system that communicates with the welding job sequencer to direct the welding job sequencer to automatically select the welding schedule for use by the operator therein.
In an embodiment, a method of monitoring a welding production line is provided that includes automatically selecting a welding schedule for use by an operator in a semi-automatic welding work cell. In the embodiment, the method can include directing the welding job sequencer to automatically select the welding schedule for use by the operator therein.
In an embodiment, a semi-automatic welding work cell is provided that includes a welding job sequencer that automatically selects a welding schedule for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. The automatic selection may be by way of elapsed time, a detection of welding operations, a detection of the amount of welding wire supplied for the welding operation, or a detection of the amount of energy supplied for the welding operation.
In an embodiment, a method of welding in a semi-automatic work cell having welding equipment and a welding job sequencer to complete an assembly defined by a plurality of welds can be provided in which the plurality of welds can be defined by at least two weld schedules. The embodiment can include at least the steps of the following: implementing a welding equipment function with the welding job sequencer to define from the at least two weld schedules a first weld schedule having at least one first weld set up parameter and at least one first weld instruction and a second weld schedule having at least one second weld set up parameter and at least one second weld instruction, at least one of the said second weld set up parameter and said second weld instruction is different from said first weld set up parameter and said first weld instruction; indicating to a welding operator a sequence of welding operations for completing the assembly based on said first and second weld schedules; and automatically modifying said welding equipment in accordance with said sequence of welding operations for completing the assembly based on said first and second weld schedules.
In the embodiment, the method can include defining said second weld schedule is performed after an elapsed time defined by said first weld schedule. In the embodiment, the method can include detecting when the operator is conducting said first weld schedule, wherein defining said second schedule is based upon that detection. In the embodiment, defining said first and second weld schedules can include defining an amount of welding wire supplied for the welding operation. In the embodiment, defining said second weld schedule is according to an amount of energy supplied for the welding operation for said first weld schedule. In the embodiment, defining at least one of the first and second weld schedules can include selecting at least one of a welding process, wire type, wire size, WFS, volts, trim, wire feeder to use, or feed bead to use. In an embodiment, defining at least one of the first and second weld schedules can include selecting a wire feeder for use by an operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In an embodiment, the method can include monitoring quality measurables of a weld created by the operator, wherein the quality measureables comprise at least information about an arc used to form the weld created by the operator. In an embodiment, the method can include indicating information to the operator in the semi-automatic welding work cell. In an embodiment, the method can include accepting job information comprising at least a part ID number, operator ID number, or welding instructions. In an embodiment, the method can include producing a job report comprising at least one of a number of welds performed, total arc time, individual arc time, sequence interruptions, errors, faults, wire usage, arc data performing a system check comprising at least a detection of wire supply, gas supply, and time.
In an embodiment, a welding production line is provided that includes at least one semi-automatic welding work cell for welding an assembly defined by a plurality of welds, the plurality of welds being defined by at least weld schedules, the semi-automatic welding work cell including welding equipment for use by a welding operator to perform the plurality of welds and complete the assembly, the welding equipment having a plurality of functions. In the embodiment, the production line can include a welding job sequencer which selects and implements at least one of the plurality of functions to define at least a first and a second weld schedule in a sequence of welding operations from the at least two weld schedules to be used by said welding operator for completing the weld assembly. In an embodiment, the production line can include said first weld schedule contains at least one first weld set up parameter and at least one first weld instruction for said welding operator and said second weld schedule contains at least one second weld set up parameter and at least one second weld instruction for said welding operator, at least one of said first weld set up parameter and said first weld instruction is different from said second weld set up parameter and said second weld instruction, said welding job sequencer automatically modifying said welding equipment in accordance with said sequence of operations without said welding operator intervention. In an embodiment, the production line can include a monitoring system in communication with the welding job sequencer to monitor completion of the at least one weld instruction of each of the first and second weld schedule.
In an embodiment, a method for monitoring a welding production line in at least one semi-automatic welding work cell for use by a welding operator to complete an assembly defined by a plurality of welds, the plurality of welds being defined by at least two weld schedules, the semi-automatic welding work cell including welding equipment and a welding job sequencer. The method can include at least the following steps: defining at least a first and a second weld schedule in a sequence of welding operations from the at least two weld schedules with the welding job sequencer said first weld schedule having at least one first weld set up parameter and at least one first weld instruction and said second weld schedule defining at least one second weld set up parameter and at least one second weld instruction with at least one of said second weld set up parameter and said second weld instruction being different from said first weld set up parameter and said first weld instruction; determining completion of said first weld schedule by said welding operator; automatically modifying the welding equipment in accordance with said second weld schedule without said welding operator intervention; and monitoring the welding operations. In the embodiment, the method can include automatically modifying the welding equipment in accordance with said second weld schedule is based on said completion of said first weld schedule.
In an embodiment, a semi-automatic welding work cell for use by an operator is provided. The embodiment can include welding equipment having a plurality of functions for performing welds by the operator and a welding job sequencer selecting from the plurality of functions to set up and organize the welding equipment for the operator. The embodiment can include the plurality of functions including: a weld schedule function defined by a sequence of weld operations; a notify function to instruct the operator to perform the weld schedule; and a quality check function to monitor at least one weld operation of the sequence of weld operations.
In the embodiment, the quality check function performs a quality check on a weld completed by the at least one weld operation. In the embodiment, the quality check function monitors the at least one weld operation during the at least one weld operation. In the embodiment, the quality check function monitors the at least one weld operation after completion of the at least one weld operation. In the embodiment, the weld schedule function defines a plurality of weld schedules, each weld schedule having a first weld operation and at least a second weld operation. In the embodiment, the quality check function monitors the at least one weld operation before allowing the sequence of weld operations to continue. In the embodiment, the quality check function detects an abnormality, the sequencer pauses the sequence of weld operations and the notify function alerts the operator of the abnormality.
Welding system 300 further includes check point component 306 that is configured to monitor a welding process and/or a welding operator in real time. For instance, the welding process is monitored in real time to detect at least one of a welding parameter (e.g., voltage, current, among others), a welding schedule parameter (e.g., welding process, wire type, wire size, WFS, volts, trim, wire feeder to use, feed head to use, among others), a weld on a workpiece as the weld is created, a movement of an operator, a position of a welding tool, a position or location of a welding equipment, a position or location of an operator, sensor data (e.g., video camera, image capture, thermal imaging device, heat sensing camera, temperature sensor, among others), and the like. Check point component 306 includes an alert system (not shown) that can communicate an alert or notification to indicate a status of the real time monitoring. In an embodiment, check point component 306 can utilize thresholds, ranges, limits, and the like for the real time monitoring to precisely identify a abnormality with welding system 300. Furthermore, check point component 306 can communicate an alert or notification to welding work cell 304 or the operator to at least one of stop the welding procedure, continue with the welding procedure, pause the welding procedure, terminate the welding procedure, or request approval of the welding procedure. In an embodiment, check point component 306 can store monitoring data (e.g., video, images, results, sensor data, and the like) in at least one of a server, a data store, a cloud, a combination thereof, among others.
Weld score component 308 is included with welding system 300 and is configured to evaluate a weld created by an operator within welding work cell 304 upon completion of such weld. Weld score component 308 provides a rating or score for the completed weld to facilitate implementing a quality control on the workpiece and/or assembly of the workpiece. For instance, weld score component 308 can alert a quality inspection upon completion, provide data collection of a job (e.g., assembly of workpiece, weld on workpiece, among others), and the like. In an embodiment, an in-person quality inspection can be performed upon completion of a portion of the assembly (e.g., completion of a weld, completion of two or more welds, completion of assembly, among others). In another embodiment, weld score component 308 can utilize a sensor to collect data (e.g., video camera, image capture, thermal imaging device, heat sensing camera, temperature sensor, among others) to determine approval of the job. For instance, a quality inspection can be performed remotely via video or image data collected upon completion of a job.
It is to be appreciated that welding job sequencer component 302 can be a stand-alone component (as depicted), incorporated into welding work cell 304, incorporated into check point component 306, incorporated into weld score component 308, or a suitable combination thereof. Additionally, as discussed below, welding job sequencer component 302 can be a distributed system, software-as-a-service (SaaS), a cloud-based system, or a combination thereof. Further, it is to be appreciated and understood that check point component 306 can be a stand-alone component (as depicted), incorporated into welding work cell 304, incorporated into welding job sequencer component 302, incorporated into weld score component 308, or a suitable combination thereof. Additionally, check point component 306 can be a distributed system, software-as-a-service (SaaS), a cloud-based system, or a combination thereof. Moreover, it is to be appreciated and understood that weld score component 308 can be a stand-alone component (as depicted), incorporated into welding work cell 304, incorporated into welding job sequencer component 302, incorporated into check point component 306, or a suitable combination thereof. Additionally, weld score component 308 can be a distributed system, software-as-a-service (SaaS), a cloud-based system, or a combination thereof.
Welding circuit path 405 runs from welder power source 410 through welding cable 420 to welding tool 430, through workpiece 440 and/or to workpiece connector 450, and back through welding cable 420 to welder power source 110. During operation, electrical current runs through welding circuit path 405 as a voltage is applied to welding circuit path 405. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, welding cable 420 comprises a coaxial cable assembly. In accordance with another embodiment, welding cable 420 comprises a first cable length running from welder power source 410 to welding tool 430, and a second cable length running from workpiece connector 450 to welder power source 410.
Welding system 400 includes welding job sequencer component 302 (as described above). Welding job sequencer component 302 is configured to interact with a portion of welding system 400. For instance, welding job sequencer component 302 can interact with at least the power source 410, a portion of welding circuit path 405, spool of wire 460, wire feeder 470, or a combination thereof. Welding job sequencer component 302 automatically adjusts one or more elements of welding system 400 based on a welding sequence, wherein the welding sequence is utilized to configure welding system 400 (or an element thereof) without operator intervention in order to perform two or more welding procedures with respective settings or configurations for each welding procedure.
In an embodiment, welding job sequencer component 302 employs a welding sequence to automatically configure welding equipment. It is to be appreciated that welding system 400 or welding work cell can employ a plurality of welding sequences for assembly of one or more workpieces. For instance, a workpiece can include three (3) welds to complete assembly in which a first welding sequence can be used for the first weld, a second welding sequence can be used for the second weld, and a third welding sequence can be used for the third weld. Moreover, in such example, the entire assembly of the workpiece including the three (3) welds can be referenced as a welding sequence. In an embodiment, a welding sequence that includes specific configurations or steps can further be included within a disparate welding sequence (e.g., nested welding sequence). A nested welding sequence can be a welding sequence that includes a welding sequence as part of the procedure. Moreover, the welding sequence can include at least one of a parameter, a welding schedule, a portion of a welding schedule, a step-by-step instruction, a portion of media (e.g., images, video, text, and the like), a tutorial, among others. In general, the welding sequence can be created and employed in order to guide an operator through welding procedure(s) for specific workpieces without the operator manually setting welding equipment to perform such welding procedures. The subject innovation relates to creating a welding sequence and/or modifying a welding sequence.
One or more welder power source(s) (e.g., welder power source 410) aggregates data respective to a respective welding process to which the welder power source is providing power to implement. Such collected data relates to each welder power source and is herein referred to as “weld data.” Weld data can include welding parameters and/or information specific to the particular welding process the welder power source is supplying power. For instance, weld data can be an output (e.g., a waveform, a signature, a voltage, a current, among others), a weld time, a power consumption, a welding parameter for a welding process, a welder power source output for the welding process, and the like. In an embodiment, weld data can be utilized with welding job sequencer component 302. For example, weld data can be set by a welding sequence. In another example, weld data can be used as a feedback or a feedforward loop to verify settings.
In one embodiment, welding job sequencer component 302 is a computer operable to execute the disclosed methodologies and processes, including methods 1100 and 1200 described herein. In order to provide additional context for various aspects of the present invention, the following discussion is intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which the various aspects of the present invention may be implemented. While the invention has been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions that may run on one or more computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention also may be implemented in combination with other program modules and/or as a combination of hardware and/or software. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the inventive methods may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including single-processor or multiprocessor computer systems, minicomputers, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, and the like, each of which may be operatively coupled to one or more associated devices. The illustrated aspects of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where certain tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices. For instance, a remote database, a local database, a cloud-computing platform, a cloud database, or a combination thereof can be utilized with welding job sequencer 302.
Welding job sequencer 302 can utilize an exemplary environment for implementing various aspects of the invention including a computer, wherein the computer includes a processing unit, a system memory and a system bus. The system bus couples system components including, but not limited to the system memory to the processing unit. The processing unit may be any of various commercially available processors. Dual microprocessors and other multi-processor architectures also can be employed as the processing unit.
The system bus can be any of several types of bus structure including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus and a local bus using any of a variety of commercially available bus architectures. The system memory can include read only memory (ROM) and random access memory (RAM). A basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within welding job sequencer 302, such as during start-up, is stored in the ROM.
Welding job sequencer 302 can further include a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk, and an optical disk drive, e.g., for reading a CD-ROM disk or to read from or write to other optical media. Welding job sequencer 302 can include at least some form of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by the computer. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by welding job sequencer 302.
Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, Radio Frequency (RF), Near Field Communications (NFC), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), infrared, and/or other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media.
A number of program modules may be stored in the drives and RAM, including an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. The operating system in welding job sequencer 302 can be any of a number of commercially available operating systems.
In addition, a user may enter commands and information into the computer through a keyboard and a pointing device, such as a mouse. Other input devices may include a microphone, an IR remote control, a track ball, a pen input device, a joystick, a game pad, a digitizing tablet, a satellite dish, a scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit through a serial port interface that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, a game port, a universal serial bus (“USB”), an IR interface, and/or various wireless technologies. A monitor (e.g., display 415), or other type of display device, may also be connected to the system bus via an interface, such as a video adapter. Visual output may also be accomplished through a remote display network protocol such as Remote Desktop Protocol, VNC, X-Window System, etc. In addition to visual output, a computer typically includes other peripheral output devices, such as speakers, printers, etc.
A display (in addition or in combination with display 415) can be employed with welding job sequencer 302 to present data that is electronically received from the processing unit. For example, the display can be an LCD, plasma, CRT, etc. monitor that presents data electronically. Alternatively or in addition, the display can present received data in a hard copy format such as a printer, facsimile, plotter etc. The display can present data in any color and can receive data from welding job sequencer 302 via any wireless or hard wire protocol and/or standard. In another example, welding job sequencer 302 and/or system 400 can be utilized with a mobile device such as a cellular phone, a smart phone, a tablet, a portable gaming device, a portable Internet browsing device, a Wi-Fi device, a Portable Digital Assistant (PDA), among others.
The computer can operate in a networked environment using logical and/or physical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer(s). The remote computer(s) can be a workstation, a server computer, a router, a personal computer, microprocessor based entertainment appliance, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer. The logical connections depicted include a local area network (LAN) and a wide area network (WAN). Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer is connected to the local network through a network interface or adapter. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer typically includes a modem, or is connected to a communications server on the LAN, or has other means for establishing communications over the WAN, such as the Internet. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that network connections described herein are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
Alternatively or in addition, a local or cloud (e.g., local, cloud, remote, among others) computing platform can be utilized for data aggregation, processing, and delivery. For this purpose, the cloud computing platform can include a plurality of processors, memory, and servers in a particular remote location. Under a software-as-a-service (SaaS) paradigm, a single application is employed by a plurality of users to access data resident in the cloud. In this manner, processing requirements at a local level are mitigated as data processing is generally done in the cloud, thereby relieving user network resources. The software-as-a-service application allows users to log into a web-based service (e.g., via a web browser) which hosts all the programs resident in the cloud.
Turning to
In an embodiment, each welding work cell further includes a local data store. For instance, first welding work cell 515 includes welding job sequencer component 535 and data store 550, second welding work cell 520 includes welding job sequencer component 540 and data store 555, and Nth welding work cell 530 includes welding job sequencer component 545 and data store 560. It is to be appreciated that system 500 includes welding job sequencer 302 hosted by computing platform 510 in which each welding work cell includes a distributed and respective welding job sequencer component. Yet, it is to be understood that welding job sequencer 302 (and distributed welding job sequencer components 535, 540, and 545) can be a stand-alone component in each welding work cell or a stand-alone component in the computing platform 510.
Each welding work cell can include a respective data store that stores a portion of at least one welding sequence. For instance, welding sequences related to a welding process A is employed at one or more welding work cell. The welding sequence is stored in a respective local data store (e.g., data stores 550, 555, and 560). Yet, it is to be appreciated and understood that each welding work cell can include a local data store (as depicted), a collective and shared remote data store, a collective and shared local data store, a cloud data store hosted by computing platform 510, or a combination thereof. A “data store” or “memory” can be, for example, either volatile memory or nonvolatile memory, or can include both volatile and nonvolatile memory. The data store of the subject systems and methods is intended to comprise, without being limited to, these and other suitable types of memory. In addition, the data store can be a server, a database, a hard drive, a flash drive, an external hard drive, a portable hard drive, a cloud-based storage, a solid-state drive, and the like.
For instance, welding job sequencer component 302 can manage each welding job sequencer component 535, 540, 545 in each welding work cell 515, 520, 530. In another embodiment, the communications can be transmitted from the welding job sequencer 302 to each welding work cell (e.g., each welding job sequencer component). In another embodiment, the communications can be received from each welding work cell (e.g., each welding job sequencer component) from the welding job sequencer component 302. For instance, a welding sequence can be used with 1st welding work cell 515 and communicated directly to a disparate welding work cell or via computing platform 510.
In an embodiment, welding job sequencer 302 communicates one or more welding sequence to a target welding work cell, wherein the target welding work cell is a welding work cell that is to utilize the communicated welding sequence. Yet, in another embodiment, welding job sequencer 302 utilizes memory 650 hosted by computing platform 510 in which one or more welding sequences are stored. Yet, the stored welding sequence can be related or targeted to one or more welding work cells regardless of a storage location (e.g., local, cloud, remote, among others).
By way of example and not limitation, the input can be data communicated from the operator or obtained from the operator, wherein such data can be verified by system 700 to ensure operator integrity (e.g., prevent unauthorized operators, verification of operator with credentials, and the like). For instance, the input can be at least one of a username, a password, employee identification, image identification, or a combination thereof. For example, the image identification can be a barcode, a Quick Response (QR) code, a portion of a graphic, a logo, a 3-dimensional (3D) barcode, among others. In an embodiment, an image can be displayed on a device for receipt to system 700 for authorization (e.g., device receives email at operator's work email account and email includes image that allows registration for a period of time). For instance, a unique logo can be submitted by an operator and registered as an identification to which system 700 verifies and corresponds to the operator. In such instance, the unique logo can be placed on equipment (e.g., glove, apron, jacket, visor, helmet, and the like) of the operator. In still another embodiment, an employee identification can be affixed to the operator's equipment, wherein register component 702 receives and/or collects such input in order to authorize such operator for welding equipment and/or welding sequence employment.
In still another embodiment, the input can be biometric data. By way of example, the biometric data can be a handprint, a fingerprint, a retinal scan of an eye, a portion of facial data of the operator, a height of the operator, a weight of the operator, body-shape of the operator, capacitance of operator based on body-mass index, among others. For instance, an operator can approach a welding work cell and register component 702 can receive biometric data such as, for instance, a handprint or palm print. Based on the biometric data, system 704 can authenticate the operator and identify at least one welding sequence via a welding sequence data store 706, wherein the authentication allows at least one of use of welding equipment within the welding work cell and/or use of the identified welding sequence. As discussed above, data store (here, welding sequence data store 706) can be, for example, either volatile memory or nonvolatile memory, or can include both volatile and nonvolatile memory. The data store (here, welding sequence data store 706) of system 700 is intended to comprise, without being limited to, these and other suitable types of memory. In addition, the data store can be a server, a database, a hard drive, a flash drive, an external hard drive, a portable hard drive, a cloud-based storage, a solid-state drive, and the like. It is to be appreciated that input data received or registered (discussed below) can be stored in a dedicated data store for such data, welding sequence data store, a remote data store, a cloud-based environment, a combination thereof, among others.
As discussed above, register component 702 can include any computing device and/or peripheral, among others. It is to be appreciated that any suitable device (e.g., smartphone, laptop, webcam, camera, digital device, portable electronic device, computing device, desktop, scanner, image grabber, barcode reader, and the like) that collects inputs described above is to be included in the subject disclosure. Moreover, register component 702 can be further configured to register input to an operator in which such input is used as a system authenticated input. The system authenticated input can be data to which later inputs are compared in order to authenticate or validate. It is to be appreciated that obtaining or collected system authenticated input can be referred to as registration of an operator.
System 700 allows registration and/or authorization to allow an operator to utilize one or more welding sequences to perform one or more welding operations for one or more workpieces. For instance, registration component 702 can authorize an operator to utilize more than one welding sequence. Moreover, registration component 702 can authorize an operator to employ a welding sequence on one or more workpieces or welding jobs. In other words, system 700 can be utilized to allow for a batch log in (e.g., registration and/or authorization) as well as a log in for each workpiece. For instance, system 700 can be used to allow an operator to log in for each part (e.g., workpiece, assembly of a workpiece(s), step or sequence in a welding sequence) and/or log in for a batch of parts (e.g., more than one part).
In an embodiment, the authorization of the operator is utilized as a condition to satisfy prior to access or use of a welding sequence via welding job sequencer component 704. For instance, a welding sequence can be utilized by an operator based on pre-defined criteria such as, but not limited to, training, experience, welding hours, welding courses completed, among others. In other words, welding job sequencer component 704 can restrict an operator from using a welding sequence based upon the operator being unauthorized. However, upon authorization of the operator, welding job sequencer component 704 identifies welding sequence(s) (via welding sequence data store 706) from which the operator can select and utilize to perform one or more welds.
It is to be appreciated that an operator authorization can be utilized in one or more environments. For instance, an operator can register in welding environment A and further submit input in a welding work cell in welding environment B for authorization. In other words, operator registration may originate at a first welding environment and authorization may be provided at a second welding environment. In still another embodiment, a registration environment can be used to which system authenticated data can be accessed or utilized to more than one welding environment. Moreover, welding sequences associated or authorized for use by an operator may extend across one or more welding environments. In an embodiment, a welding sequence may include an additional training or supervision before use in one environment compared to another.
In an example, a welding sequence can include a replenishment of a consumable. The welding sequence can be created or edited to include a replenishment of a consumable for at least one of a welding work cell, a welding equipment, among others. For instance, a replenishment of a consumable can be included with a welding sequence after a period of time, wherein the period of time is estimated based on the duration the welding equipment is used (e.g., estimate the use of consumables). Thus, a welding environment, welding system, and/or welding work cell can be evaluated in real time or from collected real time data and identify data to determine a replenishment of a consumable.
In another example, a welding sequence can include an inspection or a repair. The welding sequence can be created or edited to include an inspection request or a repair request based on a factor such as, but not limited to, a time, a duration, among others. A welding work cell can have a maintenance period for a particular time and if a welding sequence is created for such welding work cell, a repair or maintenance can be included with the created welding sequence. Thus, a welding environment, welding system, and/or welding work cell can be evaluated in real time or from collected real time data and identify data to determine inspections or repairs.
In another example, a welding sequence can include a pre-shift routine that is performed prior to a welding operation. For instance, a shift can be part of a scheduling of operators or employees, wherein the shift is a duration of time when operators are working. As an example, a shift can be from seven (7) am to three (3) pm. Based on gathered historic welding data or real time welding data, an estimation of welding time can be calculated to facilitate determining maintenance to perform on welding equipment. In an embodiment, at least one of gas flow, tip condition, tip replacement, nozzle inspection, nozzle replacement, among others can be included within a welding sequence based on the estimation of welding time.
Furthermore, it is to be appreciated and understood that register component 702 can be a stand-alone component (as depicted), incorporated into welding job sequencer component 704, incorporated into welding equipment (not shown), or a combination thereof. Additionally, welding job sequencer component 704 can be a stand-alone component (as depicted), incorporated into register component 704, incorporated into welding equipment (not shown), or a combination thereof. Further, welding sequence data store 706 can be a local data store, a remote data store, a cloud-based data store, a computing platform, and/or any other network or computing environment configuration discussed above in regards to the welding job sequencer component.
Data relating to a fixture (e.g., position, location, number of fixtures, among others) can be referred to as fixture data. Fixture data can be included within a welding sequence or associated with a welding sequence. Thus, prior to employing a welding sequence, monitor component 802 can verify fixture data (e.g., position of fixture, number of fixtures, pressure required for each fixture, among others). In another embodiment, fixture data can be associated with workpiece 808, job, client, or assembly. In general, an identification of workpiece 808 and/or welding sequence can be used to determine fixture data, wherein performance of a weld can be dependent upon validation of fixture data for quality control.
System 800 further includes identification component 810 that is configured to determine a welding sequence for workpiece 808. Identification component 810 can collect or receive data from workpiece 808 and identify at least one welding sequence that includes welding procedures to perform thereon. In an embodiment, identification component 810 leverages a data store (not shown but discussed above in
Monitor component 802 can leverage, for instance, image data (e.g., camera data), position sensors on fixtures, pressure sensors on fixtures, workpiece orientation, among others. Based on the validation of the one or more fixtures, welding equipment 806 may be activated (if position and/or location of fixtures are verified) or remain deactivated (if position and/or location of fixtures are not in accordance with standards).
Location component 902 can further generate a target (e.g., via a light, a hologram, an image, and the like) on operator equipment 908. For instance, the target can be generated and/or displayed onto a visor of an operator, a glass of a pair of glasses, among others. It is to be appreciated that the operator can selectively control whether the target is displayed or not displayed in order to minimize restriction of vision and/or improve safety. In another embodiment, location component 902 can interact with a video device that allows an operator to view workpiece 904 through the video device and have a target overlaid thereon via a display or viewfinder of the video device.
System 900 further includes ID display component 906 that is configured to project data onto workpiece 904 and/or onto a surface within a welding work cell, wherein the data relates to specify a welding operation being performed on workpiece 904. For instance, the data can be, but is not limited to, a job reference, a work order, a welding schedule, a barcode, a serial number, a reference identification, one or more numbers, one or more letters, a welding sequence identification, a client reference, and/or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, ID display component 906 can be configured to display additional information related to the one or more welding procedures performed such as, but not limited to, an operator identification, a timer illustrating a duration of time welding, a counter (e.g., counting a number of welds), a weld score (e.g., rating or score of welding performance), a date, a time, among others.
RFID tag 1004 can be an active tag (e.g., power source used to allow transmission from tag to reader) or a passive tag (e.g., a portion of a signal received from RFID reader or component 1002 is used to power transmission from the tag to RFID reader or component 1002). Moreover, it is to be appreciated that there can be any suitable number of RFID readers, corresponding sets of tags for each reader, and the like. RFID reader or component 1002 communicates wirelessly with at least one RFID tag 1004 based on a geographic range or distance therebetween. For instance, based on at least one of a frequency, power source (e.g., passive tag, active tag, amount of power from power source), among others, the geographic range or distance can vary. In any event, when the frequency and/or power source allow wireless communication between at least one tag and RFID reader or component 1002, data is communicated from at least one RFID tag to RFID reader or component 1002, wherein the data is information related to at least one of workpiece 1006, job, work order, weld operation, welding sequence to use, among others.
An RFID system (e.g., system 1000) consists of at least an RFID tag (e.g., RFID tag 1004) and an RFID transceiver (e.g., RFID component 1002). The RFID tag can contain an antenna that provides reception and/or transmission to radio frequency queries from the RFID transceiver. The RFID tag can be a small object, such as, for example, an adhesive sticker, a flexible label and integrated chip, etc. There are typically four different frequencies the RFID tags utilize: low frequency tags (between about 125 to 134 kilohertz), high frequency tags (about 13.56 megahertz), UHF tags (about 868 to 956 megahertz) and Microwave tags (about 2.45 gigahertz). In general, an RFID system can include multiple components: tags, tag readers (e.g., tag transceivers), tag writers, tag-programming stations, circulation readers, sorting equipment, tag inventory wands, among others.
In view of the exemplary devices and elements described supra, methodologies that may be implemented in accordance with the disclosed subject matter will be better appreciated with reference to the flow charts and/or methodologies of
Sequentially, the following occurs as illustrated in the decision tree flow diagram 1100 of
In an embodiment, method 1100 can further include receiving a wireless signal from a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tag associated with the workpiece and selecting the welding sequence for the workpiece based on the wireless signal. In the embodiment, method 1100 can further include projecting a weld location image onto at least one of an equipment of the operator or the workpiece, wherein the weld location image indicates where to perform at least one of the first weld or the second weld and projecting an identification image onto at least one of an equipment of the operator or the workpiece, wherein the identification image specifies the workpiece by at least one of a serial number, a number, a client, or a job reference.
The following occurs as illustrated in the flow diagram 1200 of
By way of example and not limitation, welding equipment (e.g., controller for a welder power source, wire feeder, welder power source, among others) can include one or more steps related to a particular welding process for a specific workpiece, wherein a step can include a respective setting or configuration for at least one welding equipment. For instance, a first workpiece can include steps A, B, C, and D based on welding parameters desired, the welding process used, and/or the workpiece. In another example, a second workpiece can include steps B, C, A, E, and F. With the employment of a welding sequence, the controller implementing the steps for the welding process via the welder power source and/or welding equipment can be managed and/or instructed. For instance, the welding sequence can indicate at least one of the following: which steps to perform, redo a step, skip a step, pause a sequence of steps, among others. Furthermore, a controller (e.g., or other suitable component) can control one or more welder power sources, parameters, welding schedules, among others associated with one or more welding processes, wherein each welding process can have a corresponding welding sequence(s).
In an embodiment, a welder system is provided that includes a weld score component that is configured to evaluate at least one of the first weld or the second weld performed on the workpiece based upon at least one of an image of the first weld or the second weld or a user inspection. In an embodiment, a welder system is provided that includes a check point component that is configured to monitor the creation of at least one of the first weld or the second weld in real time. In an embodiment, a welder system is provided in which a welding job sequencer component instructs an operator of the welding work cell to assemble the workpiece with the first welding procedure and the second welding procedure having two separate welding schedules.
In an embodiment, the first component is configured to identify the operator with a portion of biometric data. In the embodiment, the portion of biometric data is at least one of a handprint, a fingerprint, a retinal scan of an eye, a portion of facial data of the operator, a height of the operator, or a weight of the operator. In an embodiment, the first component identifies the operator by an image and the image is located on at least one of a helmet of the operator, a protective shield on a helmet, a glove, a welding gun, an identification badge, a welding jacket, a welding sleeve, a welding apron, or a pair of glasses. In the embodiment, the image is at least one of a barcode, an employee identification, a set of letters, a set of numbers, a graphic, a logo, a Quick Response (QR) code, or a three-dimensional (3D) barcode.
In an embodiment, a system can include a monitor component that is configured to detect a location of at least one fixture used with the workpiece within the welding work cell, wherein the at least one fixture secures the workpiece from movement during the first weld or the second weld and a monitor component that is configured to verify the location of the at least one fixture corresponds to a location indicated with the welding sequence. In the embodiment, the monitor component is at least one of a pressure sensor, an image capture device, or a video device. In the embodiment, the monitor component detects the location of the at least one fixture based on an orientation of the workpiece within the welding cell.
In an embodiment, a system can include a location component that is configured to navigate a weld location for the workpiece to the operator based upon the welding sequence. In the embodiment, the location component projects the weld location on at least one of the workpiece or an equipment of the operator. In the embodiment, the equipment of the operator is at least one of a helmet, a visor, a lens on a pair of glasses, or a display on a glove.
In an embodiment, a system can include a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) component that is configured to receive a wireless signal from an RFID tag affixed to the workpiece, wherein the wireless signal includes data to identify the workpiece and a select component that is configured to identify the welding sequence based on the identified workpiece.
The above examples are merely illustrative of several possible embodiments of various aspects of the present invention, wherein equivalent alterations and/or modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon reading and understanding this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components (assemblies, devices, systems, circuits, and the like), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component, such as hardware, software, or combinations thereof, which performs the specified function of the described component (e.g., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the illustrated implementations of the invention. In addition although a particular feature of the invention may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Also, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in the detailed description and/or in the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.”
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that are not different from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
The best mode for carrying out the invention has been described for purposes of illustrating the best mode known to the applicant at the time. The examples are illustrative only and not meant to limit the invention, as measured by the scope and merit of the claims. The invention has been described with reference to preferred and alternate embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon the reading and understanding of the specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/802,951, filed Mar. 14, 2013, and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF RECEIVING OR USING DATA FROM EXTERNAL SOURCES FOR A WELDING SEQUENCE,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/613,652, filed Dec. 20, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,195, issued Aug. 11, 2015, and entitled “WELDING JOB SEQUENCER.” The entirety of the aforementioned applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1159119 | Springer | Nov 1915 | A |
| D140630 | Garibay | Mar 1945 | S |
| D142377 | Dunn | Sep 1945 | S |
| D152049 | Alanson | Dec 1948 | S |
| 2681969 | Burke | Jun 1954 | A |
| D174208 | Abildgaard | Mar 1955 | S |
| 2728838 | Barnes | Dec 1955 | A |
| D176942 | Cross | Feb 1956 | S |
| 2894086 | Rizer | Jul 1959 | A |
| 3035155 | Hawk | May 1962 | A |
| 3059519 | Stanton | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3356823 | Waters et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3555239 | Kerth | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3581051 | Brown et al. | May 1971 | A |
| 3621177 | McPherson et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3654421 | Streetman et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3689734 | Burley et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3739140 | Rotilio | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3847584 | Houser | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3866011 | Cole | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3867769 | Schow et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3904845 | Minkiewicz | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3988913 | Metcalfe et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| D243459 | Bliss | Feb 1977 | S |
| 4024371 | Drake | May 1977 | A |
| 4041615 | Whitehill | Aug 1977 | A |
| D247421 | Driscoll | Mar 1978 | S |
| 4104724 | Dix et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4124944 | Blair | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4132014 | Schow | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4145593 | Merrick et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4153913 | Swift | May 1979 | A |
| 4237365 | Lambros et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4280041 | Kiessling et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4280137 | Ashida et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4314125 | Nakamura | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4324973 | Kirwan et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4359622 | Dostoomian et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4375026 | Kearney | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4380696 | Masaki | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4390954 | Manning | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4410787 | Kremers et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4419560 | Zurek | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4419562 | Jon et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4429266 | Tradt | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4452589 | Denison | Jun 1984 | A |
| D275292 | Bouman | Aug 1984 | S |
| 4477713 | Cook et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4484059 | Lillquist | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4497019 | Waber | Jan 1985 | A |
| D277761 | Korovin et al. | Feb 1985 | S |
| 4527045 | Nakajima | Jul 1985 | A |
| D280329 | Bouman | Aug 1985 | S |
| 4611111 | Baheti et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4616326 | Meier et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4629860 | Lindbom | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4631700 | Lapeyre | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4677277 | Cook et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4680014 | Paton et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4681999 | Hruska | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4689021 | Vasiliev et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4707582 | Beyer | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4716273 | Paton et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| D297704 | Bulow | Sep 1988 | S |
| 4785159 | Hruska | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4867685 | Brush et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4877940 | Bangs et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4881678 | Gaudin | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4897521 | Burr | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4907973 | Hon | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4920248 | Toyoda et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4931018 | Herbst et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4998050 | Nishiyama et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5034593 | Rice et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5061841 | Richardson | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5081338 | Dufrenne | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5089914 | Prescott | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5192845 | Kirmsse et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5206472 | Myking et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206474 | Fukuoka | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5265787 | Ishizaka et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5266930 | Ichikawa et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5278390 | Blankenship | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5285916 | Ross | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5305183 | Teynor | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306893 | Morris et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5320538 | Baum | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5337611 | Fleming et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5360156 | Ishizaka et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5360960 | Shirk | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5380978 | Pryor | Jan 1995 | A |
| D359296 | Witherspoon | Jun 1995 | S |
| 5424634 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5436638 | Bolas et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5449877 | Buda et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5450315 | Stefanski | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5464957 | Kidwell et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467957 | Gauger | Nov 1995 | A |
| D365583 | Viken | Dec 1995 | S |
| 5474225 | Geier et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5493093 | Cecil | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5533206 | Petrie et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5562843 | Yasumoto | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5651903 | Shirk | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5670071 | Ueyama et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5676503 | Lang | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5676867 | Van Allen | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5708253 | Bloch et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710405 | Solomon et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719369 | White et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| D392534 | Degen et al. | Mar 1998 | S |
| 5728991 | Takada et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734421 | Maguire, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751258 | Fergason et al. | May 1998 | A |
| D395296 | Kaye et al. | Jun 1998 | S |
| 5773779 | Morlock | Jun 1998 | A |
| D396238 | Schmitt | Jul 1998 | S |
| 5781258 | Dabral et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5823785 | Matheme, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835077 | Dao et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835277 | Hegg | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837968 | Rohrberg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845053 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850066 | Dew et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859847 | Dew et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866866 | Shimada | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5877468 | Morlock | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5910894 | Pryor | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5949388 | Atsumi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5963891 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6002104 | Hsu | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008470 | Zhang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6023044 | Kosaka et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6049059 | Kim | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051805 | Vaidya et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063458 | Robertson et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6087627 | Kramer | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6114645 | Burgess | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6115273 | Geisler | Sep 2000 | A |
| RE36926 | Austin | Oct 2000 | E |
| 6133545 | Okazaki et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151640 | Buda et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6155475 | Ekelöf et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6155928 | Burdick | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167328 | Takaoka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6230327 | Briand et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236013 | Delzenne | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236017 | Smartt | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6242711 | Cooper | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6271500 | Hirayama et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278074 | Molock et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292715 | Hsu | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6330938 | Hervé et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330966 | Eissfeller | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331848 | Stove et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| D456428 | Aronson, II et al. | Apr 2002 | S |
| 6373465 | Jolly et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| D456828 | Aronson, II et al. | May 2002 | S |
| 6399912 | Steenis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| D461383 | Blackburn | Aug 2002 | S |
| 6441342 | Hsu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444942 | Kawai et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6445964 | White et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6492618 | Flood et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6506997 | Matsuyama | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6548783 | Kilovsky et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6552303 | Blankenship et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6560029 | Dobbie et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6563489 | Latypov et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6568846 | Cote et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| D475726 | Suga et al. | Jun 2003 | S |
| 6572379 | Sears et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6583386 | Ivkovich | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6621049 | Suzuki | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6624388 | Blankenship et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6636776 | Barton et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| D482171 | Vui et al. | Nov 2003 | S |
| 6644645 | Bakodledis | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6647288 | Madill et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6649858 | Wakeman | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6655645 | Lu et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6660965 | Simpson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6697701 | Hillen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697770 | Nagetgaal | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6700097 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6703585 | Suzuki | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6708385 | Lemelson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6710298 | Eriksson | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6710299 | Blankenship et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6715502 | Rome et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6717108 | Hsu | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| D490347 | Meyers | May 2004 | S |
| 6730875 | Hsu | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6734393 | Friedl et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6734394 | Hsu | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6744011 | Hu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6747247 | Holverson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6750428 | Okamoto et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6768974 | Nakano et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6772802 | Few | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6788442 | Potin et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6795778 | Dodge et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798974 | Nakano et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6822195 | Kanodia et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6847956 | Manicke et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6857553 | Hartman et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6858817 | Blankenship et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6865926 | O'Brien et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| D504449 | Butchko | Apr 2005 | S |
| 6847922 | Wampter, II | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6912447 | Klimko et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6920371 | Hillen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6924459 | Spear et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6930280 | Zauner et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6940039 | Blankenship et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6995665 | Appelt et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7021937 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7028882 | Kilovsky et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7030334 | Ruiz et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7032814 | Blankenship | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7072774 | Houston | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7102098 | Rouault et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7126078 | Demers et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7132617 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7170032 | Flood | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7194447 | Harvey et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7247814 | Ott | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| D555446 | Picaza Ibarrondo | Nov 2007 | S |
| 7315241 | Daily et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| D561973 | Kinsley et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
| 7353715 | Myers | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7358458 | Daniel | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363137 | Brant et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7375304 | Kainec et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7381923 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7414595 | Muffler | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7465230 | LeMay et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7478108 | Townsend et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| D587975 | Aronson, II et al. | Mar 2009 | S |
| 7515972 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7516022 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7523069 | Friedl | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7534005 | Buckman | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7539603 | Subrahmanyam | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7575304 | Sugahara | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| D602057 | Osicki | Oct 2009 | S |
| 7603191 | Gross | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7617017 | Menassa et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7621171 | O'Brien | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| D606102 | Bender et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
| 7642486 | Fosbinde et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7643890 | Hillen et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7643907 | Fuhlbrigge et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7687741 | Kainec et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| D614217 | Peters et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
| D615573 | Peters et al. | May 2010 | S |
| 7772524 | Hillen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7809534 | Sturrock | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7817162 | Bolick et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7853645 | Brown et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| D631074 | Peters et al. | Jan 2011 | S |
| 7874921 | Baszucki et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7962967 | Becker et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970172 | Hendrickson | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7972129 | O'Donoghue | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7991587 | Ihn | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8049139 | Houston | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8069017 | Hallquist | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8115138 | Jacovetty et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8224881 | Spear | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8248324 | Nangle | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8265886 | Bisiaux et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8274013 | Wallace | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8287522 | Moses et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8312060 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8316462 | Becker et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8322591 | Diez et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8363048 | Gering | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8365603 | Lesage et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8502866 | Becker et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512043 | Choquet | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8569646 | Daniel et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8569655 | Cole | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8592723 | Davidson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8777629 | Kreindl et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| RE45062 | Maguire, Jr. | Aug 2014 | E |
| 8860760 | Chen et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8884177 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9089921 | Daniel et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9104195 | Daniel et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9323056 | Williams | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9937577 | Daniel et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 20010045808 | Hietmann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052893 | Jolly et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020032553 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046999 | Veikkolainen et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020050984 | Roberts | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085843 | Mann | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107825 | Manicke et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020117487 | Corby, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020175897 | Pelosi | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000931 | Ueda et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023592 | Modica et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030025884 | Hamana et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106787 | Santini | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111451 | Blankenship et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165180 | Weerasinghe et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172032 | Choquet | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030234885 | Pilu | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008157 | Brubaker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040020907 | Zauner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040035990 | Ackeret | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040050824 | Samler | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122550 | Klimko et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140301 | Blankenship et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040232128 | Niedereder et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040245227 | Grafton-Reed et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050007504 | Fergason | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050017152 | Fergason | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046584 | Breed | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050168 | Wen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101767 | Clapham et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103766 | Iizuka et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050103767 | Kainec et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109735 | Flood | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050127052 | Spencer | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128186 | Shahoian et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050133488 | Blankenship et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149210 | Britton | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159840 | Lin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189336 | Ku | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050199602 | Kaddani et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050230573 | Ligertwood | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050252897 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275913 | Vesely et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275914 | Vesely et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010551 | Bishop et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060014130 | Weinstein | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060070987 | Daniel | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060131291 | Kaufman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136183 | Choquet | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163227 | Hillen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163230 | Kaufman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060169682 | Kainec et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173619 | Brant et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178778 | Fuhlbrigge et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189260 | Sung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207980 | Jacovetty et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060213892 | Ott | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060214924 | Kawamoto et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060226137 | Huismann et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252543 | Van Noland et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258447 | Baszucki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070034611 | Dirus et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038400 | Lee et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039937 | Jang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045488 | Shin | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070056942 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070080153 | Albrecht | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088536 | Ishikawa | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112889 | Cook et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198105 | Britton | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198117 | Wajihuddin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211026 | Ohta | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070221797 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256503 | Wong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070262065 | Peters et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070277611 | Portzgen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291035 | Vesely et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080031774 | Magnant et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038702 | Choquet | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080078811 | Hillen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080078812 | Peters et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080117203 | Gering | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080128398 | Schneider | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080135533 | Earner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140815 | Brant et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080149686 | Daniel | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158502 | Becker | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080169277 | Achtner et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080203075 | Feldhausen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080233550 | Solomon | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080314887 | Stoger et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015585 | Klusza | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090021514 | Klusza | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090045183 | Artelsmair et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090057286 | Ihara et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094721 | Becker | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090107969 | Asai | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090152251 | Dantinne et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090173726 | Davidson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090184098 | Daniel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200281 | Hampton | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090200282 | Hampton | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090231423 | Becker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259444 | Dolansky et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090277893 | Spellman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298024 | Batzler | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313549 | Casner | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325699 | Delgiannidis | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100012017 | Miller | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012625 | Silk et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100012637 | Jaeger | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048273 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100062405 | Zboray | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100062406 | Zboray | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100096373 | Hillen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121472 | Babu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100133247 | Mazumder et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100133250 | Sardy et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169053 | Martis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100176107 | Bong | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201803 | Melikian | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217440 | Lindell | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100224610 | Wallace | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262468 | Blankenship | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100276396 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299101 | Shimada et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100307249 | Lesage et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110006047 | Penrod et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110009985 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060568 | Goldfine et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110083241 | Cole | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091846 | Kreindl et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110114615 | Daniel et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110116076 | Chantry et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110117527 | Conrardy et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110120978 | Takahashi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110122495 | Togashi | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172796 | Sohmshetty et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110183304 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110198329 | Davidson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246395 | Dolson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110248864 | Becker et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255259 | Weber | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110290765 | Albrecht et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110316516 | Schiefermüller et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120081564 | Kamiya | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120095941 | Dolson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122062 | Yang | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120145689 | Hillen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120189993 | Kindig et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291172 | Wills et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120298640 | Conrardy et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120325792 | Stein et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130008003 | Izutani et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130015169 | Marschke et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130026150 | Chantry et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130040270 | Albrecht | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130075380 | Albrech et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130119037 | Daniel | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189657 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189658 | Peters et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130206741 | Pfeifer et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130230832 | Peters et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242110 | Terre et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130264319 | Temby | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130277344 | Guymon | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282182 | Hideg | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130291271 | Becker et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140021184 | Daniel | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140027422 | Panelli | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140038143 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140042135 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140042136 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140042137 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140134579 | Becker | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140134580 | Becker | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263224 | Becker | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263225 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140263226 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140272836 | Becker | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140272837 | Becker | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140272838 | Becker | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140346158 | Matthews | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150056584 | Boulware et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150056585 | Boulware et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150056586 | Penrod et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150234189 | Lyons | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150268473 | Yjima et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160165220 | Fujimaki et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160188277 | Miyasaka et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160260261 | Hsu | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160331592 | Stewart | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160361774 | Daniel et al. | Dec 2016 | A9 |
| 20170045337 | Kim | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2698078 | Sep 2011 | CA |
| 688034 | Jan 1993 | CH |
| 1370654 | Sep 2002 | CN |
| 1469791 | Jan 2004 | CN |
| 101209512 | Jul 2008 | CN |
| 101214178 | Jul 2008 | CN |
| 201083660 | Jul 2008 | CN |
| 201229711 | Apr 2009 | CN |
| 101571887 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 101600532 | Dec 2009 | CN |
| 101419755 | Aug 2010 | CN |
| 101587659 | Feb 2011 | CN |
| 20219978 | Apr 2012 | CN |
| 102573720 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102596476 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 103871279 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 105209994 | Dec 2015 | CN |
| 105229545 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 106270941 | Jan 2017 | CN |
| 2833638 | Feb 1980 | DE |
| 3046634 | Jan 1983 | DE |
| 3244307 | May 1984 | DE |
| 3522581 | Jan 1987 | DE |
| 1037879 | Jun 1991 | DE |
| 19615069 | Oct 1997 | DE |
| 19739720 | Oct 1998 | DE |
| 19834205 | Feb 2000 | DE |
| 20009543 | Aug 2001 | DE |
| 102005047204 | Apr 2007 | DE |
| 102010023663 | Dec 2011 | DE |
| 102010038902 | Feb 2012 | DE |
| 202012013151 | Feb 2015 | DE |
| 0127299 | Dec 1984 | EP |
| 0145891 | Jun 1985 | EP |
| 108599 | Dec 1988 | EP |
| 319623 | Jun 1989 | EP |
| 0852986 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 1078707 | Feb 2001 | EP |
| 1170649 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1700667 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 1702707 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 1724676 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1750185 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 1527852 | Mar 2008 | EP |
| 1905533 | Apr 2008 | EP |
| 1905533 | Nov 2013 | EP |
| 2274736 | Mar 2008 | ES |
| 1456780 | Jul 1966 | FR |
| 2827066 | Apr 2005 | FR |
| 2926660 | Jun 2011 | FR |
| 1455972 | Nov 1976 | GB |
| 1511608 | May 1978 | GB |
| 2254172 | Dec 1992 | GB |
| 2435838 | Sep 2007 | GB |
| 2454232 | Apr 2012 | GB |
| 02224877 | Sep 1990 | JP |
| 03005083 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| 05329645 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 07047471 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 07232270 | Sep 1995 | JP |
| 08132274 | May 1996 | JP |
| 08150476 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 08505091 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 2000167666 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2001071140 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2001290518 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2002278670 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2003200372 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2003326362 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2006006604 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2006281270 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2007290025 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2009500178 | Jan 2009 | JP |
| 2009160636 | Jul 2009 | JP |
| 2010075954 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| 2011070539 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 2012024867 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 20090010693 | Jan 2009 | KR |
| 2008108601 | Sep 2009 | RU |
| 1038963 | Aug 1983 | SU |
| 9845078 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| 01012376 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| 0143910 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| 01058400 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 2002086656 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2005084867 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005102230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2006034571 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2007009131 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007039278 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| 2008031052 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| 2008079165 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2009060231 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009120921 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2009149740 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2010000003 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2010044982 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010091493 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010142858 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011045657 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| 2011058433 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011067447 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011100214 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2012004491 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2011097035 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012082105 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012143327 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| 2013014202 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| 2013114189 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013160745 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013175079 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014007830 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014019045 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014020386 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014140738 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014140743 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014140746 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014140747 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014140749 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014140766 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action from Korean Application No. 10-2014-7030446 with English Translation dated Nov. 29, 2018. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Dec. 19, 2018. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Dec. 31, 2018. |
| Amendment Filed with RCE from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Oct. 4, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Oct. 30, 2018. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Jan. 30, 2019. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Dec. 7, 2018. |
| Preliminary Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 16/131,827 dated Dec. 4, 2018. |
| Receive—definition from Dictionary.com downloaded Oct. 21, 2018. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB10/02913 dated Apr. 19, 2011. |
| Notice of Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated May 8, 2019. |
| Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Jul. 8, 2019. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Jun. 19, 2019. |
| Notice of Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Jun. 20, 2019. |
| Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Aug. 20, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Jul. 10, 2019. |
| United States Provisional Patent Application for “System for Characterizing Manual Welding Operations on Pipe and Other Curved Structures;” U.S. Appl. No. 62/055,724, filed Sep. 26, 2014; p. 1-35. |
| Abbas, et al.; “Code_Aster: Introduction to Code_Aster;” User Manual; Booket U1 .0-: Introduction to Code_Aster; Document: U1 .02.00; Version 7.4; Dated Jul. 22, 2005; pp. 1-14. |
| Abid, et al.; “Numerical simulation to study the effect of tack welds and root gap on welding deformations and residual stresses of a pipe-flange joint;” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 82 (2005); Dated Aug. 25, 2005; pp. 860-871. |
| Agren; “Sensor Integration for Robotic Arc Welding;” Lunds Universitet, vol. 5604C of Dissertations Abstracts International; Dated 1995; Printed Mar. 8, 2012; p. 1123. |
| Aidun, et al.; “Penetration in Spot GTA Welds during Centrifugation;” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance; vol. 7(5); Dated Oct. 1998; pp. 597-600. |
| Aiteanu et al., “A step forward in manual welding: demonstration of augmented reality helmet;” IEEE Xplore Abstract; Accessed Jan. 15, 2016; pp. 1-2. |
| ARS Electron ICA; “Fronius: High-speed video technology is applied to research on welding equipment, and the results are visualized in the CAVE;” Dated May 18, 1997; pp. 1-2. |
| asciencetutor.com; “VWL (Virtual Welding Lab);” Dated 2007; pp. 1-2. |
| ASME; “ASME Definitions, Consumables, Welding Positions;” http:l/www.gowelding.com/wp/asme4.htm; Dated Mar. 19, 2001; pp. 1-3. |
| Antonelli, et al.; “A Semi-Automated Welding Station Exploiting Human-Robot Interaction;” Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Technology; Dated Jun. 2011; pp. 249-260. |
| Balijepalli, et al.; “A Haptic Based Virtual Grinding Tool;” Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems; Dated Jul. 2003; pp. 1-7. |
| Borzecki, et al.; “Specialist Committee V.3: Fabrication Technology;” 16th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress; vol. 2; Dated Aug. 20, 2006; pp. 115-163. |
| Cayo, et al.; “A Non-Intrusive GMA Welding Process Quality Monitoring System Using Acoustic Sensing;” Sensors, vol. 9; Dated Sep. 9, 2009; pp. 7150-7166. |
| chemweb.com; “Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance (v.7, #5);” Printed Sep. 26, 2012; pp. 1-3. |
| Chen, et al.; “Self-Learning Fuzzy Neural Networks and Computer Vision for Control of Pulsed GTAW;” Welding Research Supplement; Dated May 1997; pp. 201-s-209-s. |
| Chironis et al., “Mechanisms and Mechanical Devices SourceBook;” McGraw Hill; 2nd Addition; Dated 1996; pp. 1-10. |
| Choquet; “ARC+: Today's Virtual Reality Solution for Welders;” 123 Certification Inc.; Dated Jan. 1, 2008; pp. 1-6. |
| CS WAVE; “The Virtual Welding Trainer;” Dated 2007; pp. 1-6. |
| Da Dalto, et al.; “CS WAVE: A Virtual learning tool for welding motion;” Dated Mar. 14, 2008; pp. 1-10. |
| Desroches “Code-Aster: Note of use for calculations of welding;” Instruction Manual U2.03 Booklet: Thermomechanical; Document: U2.03.05; Dated Oct. 1, 2003; pp. 1-13. |
| D'Huart, et al.; “Virtual Environment for Training;” 6th International Conference, ITS 20002; Dated Jun. 2002; pp. 1-6. |
| Dotson; “Augmented Reality Welding Helmet Prototypes How Awesome the Technology Can Get;” http://siliconangle.com/blog/2012/09/26/augmented-reality-welding-helmet-prototypes-how-awesome-the-technology-can-get/, Dated Sep. 26, 2012; pp. 1-3. |
| Edison Welding Institute, “E-Weld Predictor;” Dated 2008; pp. 1-3. |
| Eduwelding+, “Weld Into the Future;” Online Welding Seminar—A virtual training environment; www.123arc.com; Dated 2005; pp. 1-4. |
| Eduwelding+, “Training Activities with ARC+ Simulator; Weld Into the Future;” Online Welding Simulator—A virtual training environment; www.123arc.com; Dated May 2008; pp. 1-6. |
| EWI; “Virtual Reality Welder Training;” Cooperative Research Program; Summary Report SR 0512; Dated Jul. 19 2005; pp. 1-4. |
| Farber, “The next big thing in tech: Augmented reality;” Sci-Tech CNET; Dated Jun. 7, 2013; pp. 1-11. |
| Fast et al., “Virtual Training for Welding;” Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2004, ISMAR 2004, Third IEEE and CM International Symposium; Dated Nov. 2-5, 2004; pp. 1-2. |
| Garcia-Ellende et al., “Defect Detection in Arc-Welding Processes by Means of the Line-to-Continuum Method and Feature Selection;” www.mdpi.com/joumal/sensors; Sensors 2009, 9, 7753-7770; doi; 10.3390/591007753; Published Sep. 29, 2009; pp. 7754-7770. |
| “Getting Started with LabVIEW Virtual Instruments;” National Instruments Corporation; Accessed Mar. 2015; pp. 1-70 XP-002422858. |
| Graham; “Texture Mapping;” Carnegie Mellon University; Class 15-462 Computer Graphics; Lecture 10; Dated Feb. 13, 2003; pp. 1-53. |
| Guu, et al.; “Technique for Simultaneous Real-Time Measurements of Weld Pool Surface Geometry and Arc Force;” Welding Research Supplement; Dated Dec. 1992; pp. 473-s-482-s. |
| Heston, “Virtually welding;” thefabricator.com; Dated Mar. 11, 2008; pp. 1-4. |
| Hoff et al., “Computer vision-based registration techniques for augmented reality”; Proceedings of Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision XV; SPIE vol. 2904; Dated Nov. 18-22, 1996; pp. 538-548. |
| Hillers, et al. “Augmented Reality—The third way for new technologies in welding education;” GSI SLV Duisburg, Tech. Conf. “Welding Trainer 2010” 08-09; Dated Sep. 2010; pp. 1-4. |
| Hillis et al., “Data Parallel Algorithms;” Communications of the ACM; vol. 29, No. 12; Dated Dec. 1986; pp. 1170-1183. |
| Hirche, et al.; “Hardware Accelerated Per-Pixel Displacement Mapping;” Proceedings of Graphics Interface; Dated May 17, 2004; pp. 1-8. |
| Hu, et al.; “Heat and mass transfer in gas metal arc welding. Part 1: The arc;” http://www.web.mst.eduHsai/publications/HU-IJHMT-2007-1-60.pdf; International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer; vol. 50 (2007); Dated Oct. 24, 2006; pp. 833-846. |
| Joanneum, “Fronius—virtual welding;” Dated May 12, 2008; pp. 1-2. |
| Jonsson, et al.; “Simulation of Tack Welding Procedures in Butt Joint Welding of Plates;” Welding Research Supplement; Dated Oct. 1985; pp. 296-s-302-s. |
| Lim et al., “Automatic classification of weld defects using simulated data and an MLP neutral network;” Insight, vol. 19, No. 3; Dated Mar. 2007; pp. 154-159. |
| Lincoln Global, Inc.; “VRTEX 360: Virtual Reality Arc Welding Trainer;” Product Brochure; Dated 2015; pp. 1-4. |
| Lindholm et al., “NVIDIA Testla: A Unifired Graphics and Computing Architecture;” IEEE Computer Society; Dated 2008; pp. 39-55. |
| Office Action from Australian Patent Application No. 2007338858 dated Aug. 13, 2010. |
| Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2672717 dated Mar. 21, 2013. |
| Office Action from Canadian Patent Application No. 2672717 dated Sep. 2, 2010. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200780046777.X dated Jul. 3, 2012. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200780046777.X dated Jul. 30, 2013. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200780046777.X dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200780046777.X dated Jan. 15, 2014. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200780046777.X dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200780046777.X dated Jul. 20, 2011. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026618.3 dated Mar. 17, 2017. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026618.3 dated Jun. 27, 2018. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201480027935.7 dated Mar. 23, 2017. |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201480027935.7 dated May 11, 2018 (English Translation). |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480027966.2 dated Mar. 1, 2017 (15 pages) (English Translation). |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480027966.2 dated Aug. 28, 2017 (11 pages) (English Translation). |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480027966.2 dated Mar. 8, 2018 (5 pages) (English Translation). |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480026559.X dated Apr. 27, 2017 (English Translation). |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201610806381.1 dated Aug. 1, 2017 (English Translation). |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480049376.X dated Jan. 2, 2018. |
| Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480027580.1 dated Jan. 3, 2018 (English Translation). |
| IFW of (related by subject matter) U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,349, filed Sep. 15, 2005. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US07/15014 dated Mach 11, 2008. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patenability from PCT/US07/15014 dated Jun. 23, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/000313 dated Sep. 10, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/000319 dated Aug. 29, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/000323 dated Sep. 19, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/000324 dated Sep. 8, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/000326 dated Aug. 29, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/IB2014/000350 dated Sep. 4, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT/IB2014/000350 dated Sep. 15, 2015. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patenability from PCT/US15/001991 dated May 26, 2017. |
| Lincoln Electric Company Product Brochure for NA-3 and NA-4, Automatic Welding Systems with Solid State Controls, brochure, E9.10, May 1994. |
| Power Feed 10M, Publication E8.266, Aug. 2004 brochure. |
| Lincoln Electric Company Product Brochure for Power Wave 455 M & Power Wave 455 M/Sti, Publication E5.161, Aug. 2004, brochure. |
| Lincoln Electric Company Product Brochure for NA-5 Automatic Wedling System, brochure, Publication No. 9.30, Nov. 1999. |
| The Lincoln Company, Product Brochure for Waveform Control Technology, Publication No. NX-1.10, Nov. 2003. |
| “Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. Kappos,” 75 Fed. Reg. 43,922-43,928 (Jul. 27, 2010), 7 pages. |
| Echtler et al., “The Intelligent Welding Gun: Augmented Reality for Experimental Vehicle Construction;” In: Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing; Ong. S.K. and Nee A.Y.C. eds. Springer Verlag 2003. 28 pgs., Jan. 1, 2003. |
| Rubinovitz et al., Task Leevl Off-Line Programming System for Robotic Arc Welding—An Overview 8287 Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 7 (1988) No. 4, Dearborn, MI USA; pp. 293-305. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Aug. 21, 2008. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Nov. 20, 2008. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Jun. 9, 2009. |
| Amendment from from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Sep. 9, 2009. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Jan. 25, 2010. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Jun. 11, 2010. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Aug. 17, 2011. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Dec. 19, 2011. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Feb. 20, 2014. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated May 19, 2014. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Jun. 6, 2014. |
| Decision on Rejection from Chinese Patent Application No. 201480027935.7 dated Dec. 28, 2018 (English Summary). |
| Fourth Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480027580.1 dated Apr. 15, 2019. |
| Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201480026654.X dated May 28, 2018 (English Summary). |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Feb. 8, 2019. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Apr. 1, 2019. |
| Applicant Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Feb. 28, 2019. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Mar. 20, 2019. |
| Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Dec. 21, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance with Examiner Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Apr. 4, 2019. |
| What is Implementation—definition from whatis.com downloaded Feb. 22, 2019 (5 pages). |
| Microcontroller—https:/en.wikipedia/microcontroller—downloaded Feb. 22, 2019 (11 pages). |
| Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026618.3 dated Jan. 7, 2019 (English Summary). |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Sep. 29, 2016. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Dec. 29, 2016. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Jan. 27, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Jan. 30, 2017. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Feb. 23, 2017. |
| Amendment After Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated May 22, 2017. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Jun. 15, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Jun. 20, 2017. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Aug. 7, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Dec. 6, 2017. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Dec. 15, 2017. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated May 15, 2018. |
| Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Aug. 15, 2018. |
| Advisory Action, Applicant Initiated Interview Summary and After Final Consideration Program Decision from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Sep. 17, 2018. |
| Applicant Statement of Substance of Interview from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Oct. 17, 2018. |
| Response to Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Jul. 28, 2016. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Oct. 17, 2016. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Oct. 26 2016. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Feb. 8, 2017. |
| Response to Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Jun. 8, 2017. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Aug. 24, 2017. |
| Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Jan. 24, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Jun. 29, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Sep. 26, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Jan. 26, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated May 24, 2018. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Aug. 21, 2018. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Sep. 27, 2018. |
| Notice of Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,991 dated Oct. 23, 2018. |
| Mahrle et al., “The influence of fluid flow phenomena on the laser beam welding process;” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 23; Dated 2002; pp. 288-297. |
| Mann, et al., “Realtime HOR (High Dynamic Range) Video for Eyetap Wearable Computers, FPGA-Based Seeing Aids, and Glasseyes (Eyetaps); ” Univ. of Toledo, IIEEE Canadian Conf. on Electrical and Computer Eng., 2012; pp. 1-6. |
| Mantinband, et al.; “Autosteroscopic, field-sequential display with full freedom of movement OR Let the display were the shutter-glasses!;” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4660; Dated 2002; pp. 246-253. |
| Mavrikios et al., “A prototype virtual reality-based demonstrator for immersive and interactive simulation of welding processes;” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing; vol. 19, No. 3; Dated Apr. 1, 2006; pp. 294-300. |
| Miller Electric Mfg Co., “MIG Welding System features weld monitoring software;” NewsRoom 2010 (Dialog File 992); copyright 2011 Dialog 2010; http://www.dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?reg=1331233430487; Dated Mar. 8, 2012; pp. 1-3. |
| Miller Electric Mfg Co.; “LiveArc Welding Performance Management System;” Product Brochure; Dated Dec. 2014; pp. 1-4. |
| Miller Electric Mfg Co.; “LiveArc: Welding Performance Management System;” Owner's Manual; Dated Jul. 2014; pp. 1-64. |
| Morpha Style Guide compiled by: KUKA Roboter GmbH and Reis GmbH & Co Maschinenfabrik; BMBF Lead Project Anthropomorphe Assisenzsysteme (Morpha); Style Guide for Icon-based Programming; Accessed Mar. 2015; pp. 1-56. |
| Nasios; “Improving Chemical Plant Safety Training Using Virtual Reality;” University of Nottingham, School of Chemical, Environmental, and Mining Engineering; Dated Dec. 2001; pp. 1-313. |
| N. A. Tech.; “P/NA.3 Process Modeling and Optimization;” Dated Jun. 4, 2008; pp. 1-11. |
| NSRP ASE; “Low-Cost Virtual Reality Welder Training System;” Dated 2008; p. 1. |
| O'Brien; “Google's Project Glass gets some more details;” http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/27/googles-project-glass-gets-some-more-details/, Dated Jun. 27, 2012; pp. 1-4. |
| Porter et al., “Virtual Reality Welder Training;” Paper No. 2005-P19; Dated 2005; pp. 1-16. |
| Porter, et al.; “Virtual Reality Welder Training;” Session 5: Joining Technologies for Naval Applications; Dated Jul. 14, 2006; pp. 1-29. |
| Praxaire Technology, Inc.; “The RealWeld Trainer System: Real Weld Training Under Real Conditions;” Product Brochure; Dated 2013; pp. 1-2. |
| Reeves; “Particles Systems—A Technique for Modeling a Class of Fuzzy Objects;” Computer Graphics; vol. 17, No. 3; Dated Jul. 1983; pp. 359-376. |
| Rodjito; “Position tracking and motion prediction using Fuzzy Logic;” Colby College; Honors Thesis: Department of Computer Science; Paper 520; Dated 2006; pp. 1-81. |
| Russell et al., “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach;” Prentice-Hall; Copyright 1995; pp. 1-20. |
| Schoder, “Design and Implementation of a Video Sensor for Closed Loop Control of Back Bead Weld Puddle Width;” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering; Dated May 27, 1983; pp. 1-64. |
| Simfor/Cesol; ““RV-SOLD” Welding Simulator;” Accessed on Apr. 26, 2013; pp. 1-20. |
| Stone, et al. “Full Virtual Reality vs. Integrated Virtual Reality Training in Welding,” Supplement to the Welding Journal; Dated Jun. 2013; vol. 92; pp. 167-174-s. |
| Teeravarunyou, et al.; “Computer Based Welding Training System;” International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16(2); Dated Jan. 19, 2009; pp. 116-125. |
| The Lincoln Company, “CheckPoint Production Monitoring brochure;” http://www.lincolnelectric.com/assets/en_US/products/literature/s232.pdf; Publication S2.32; Dated Feb. 2012; pp. 1-4. |
| The Lincoln Company, “VRTEX Virtual Reality Arc Welding Trainer,” http://www.lincolnelectric.com/en-us/equipment/training-equipment/Pages/vrtex.aspx; Accessed Jul. 10, 2015; pp. 1-3. |
| The Lincoln Company, “Production Monitoring 2;” Dated May 2009; pp. 1-4. |
| Tschirner et al., “A Concept for the Application of Augmented Reality in Manual Gas Metal Arc Welding;” Proceeding of the international Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (SIMAR'02), IEEE Computer Society,; Dated 2002; pp. 1-2. |
| Veiga; “Simulation of a Work Cell in the IGRIP Program;” Master's Thesis; Master of Science Programme, Mechanical Engineering; Lulea University of Technology; Dated Apr. 2006; pp. 1-50. |
| Vizitech USA; “Changing the Way America Learns;” http://vizitechusa.com/; Retrieved on Mar. 27, 2014; pp. 1-2. |
| VJ Technologies; “Vi3 Imaging Software;” Dated May 2011; pp. 1-2. |
| VRSim; “SimWelder;” http://www.simwelder.com; Retrieved on Apr. 12, 2010; pp. 1-2. |
| Wade; “Human uses of ultrasound: ancient and modern;” Ultrasonics, vol. 38; Dated 2000; pp. 1-5. |
| Wang, et al.; “Numerical Analysis of Metal Transfer in Gas Metal Arc Welding under Modified Pulsed Current Conditions;” Metallurgical and Material Transactions B; vol. 35B; Dated Oct. 2004; pp. 857-865. |
| Wang et al.; “Study on Welder Training by Means of Haptic Guidance and Virtual Reality for Arc Welding;” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics; Dated Dec. 17, 2006; pp. 954-958. |
| White, et al.; “Virtual Welder Trainer;” IEEE Virtual Reality Conference; Dated 2009; pp. 303, 2009. |
| Wu; “Microcomputer-based welder training simulator;” Computers in Industry 20; Dated 1992; pp. 321-325. |
| Wuhan Onew Technology Co. Ltd.; “ONEW-360 Welding Training Simulator;” http://en.onew1ech.com/_d276479751.htm; Accessed Jul. 10, 2015; pp. 1-12. |
| “Yao, et al.; ““Development of a Robot System for Pipe Welding;”” 2010 International Conference on MeasuringTechnology and Mechatronics Automation; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5460347&tag=1; Dated 2010; pp. 1109-1112”. |
| English Translation of Third Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201611041486.9 dated Nov. 4, 2019. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Nov. 1, 2019. |
| Reply Brief from from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Dec. 30, 2019. |
| Notice of Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Aug. 30, 2019. |
| Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Oct. 29, 2019. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Dec. 16, 2019. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated May 30, 2019. |
| Notice of Appeal from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
| Applicant Summary of Interview With Examiner from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
| Applicant Summary of Interview With Examiner from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Oct. 2, 2014. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Oct. 9, 2014. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Oct. 27, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/613,652 dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
| Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Jan. 14, 2016. |
| Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Jan. 14, 2016. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Sep. 25, 2018. |
| Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Sep. 26, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,951 dated Nov. 2, 2015. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,951 dated Mar. 2, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,951 dated Dec. 7, 2017. |
| Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Jan. 15, 2016. |
| Response to Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
| Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Apr. 13, 2016. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Jun. 2, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Jul. 26, 2016. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Oct. 17, 2016. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Oct. 26, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Feb. 8, 2017. |
| Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Jun. 8, 2017. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Jul. 6, 2017. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Nov. 3, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated May 2, 2018. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated May 3, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,985 dated Sep. 20, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Jan. 5, 2016. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated May 4, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Aug. 11, 2016. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Nov. 2, 2016. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Dec. 7, 2016. |
| Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Feb. 24, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Jun. 20, 2017. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Oct. 5, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Mar. 5, 2018. |
| Amendment Filed with RCE from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Apr. 4, 2018. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Apr. 10, 2018. |
| Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Jan. 14, 2016. |
| Response to Restriction Requirement from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Dec. 16, 2016. |
| Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated May 9, 2017. |
| Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Sep. 8, 2017. |
| Amendment from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Mar. 8, 2018. |
| Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Mar. 13, 2018. |
| Supplemental Response from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Aug. 29, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Sep. 7, 2018. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Apr. 21, 2016. |
| Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,077 dated Jul. 14, 2016. |
| Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated Mar. 19, 2020. |
| Reply Brief from U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,032 dated May 19, 2020. |
| Response from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Mar. 10, 2020. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Jun. 12, 2020. |
| Applicant Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Mar. 12, 2020. |
| Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Sep. 11, 2020. |
| Board of Appeal Decision from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Aug. 27, 2020. |
| First Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201910567340.5 dated Sep. 30, 2020 with English Translation. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 16/131,827 dated Nov. 16, 2020. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,883 dated Dec. 16, 2020. |
| Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,918 dated Dec. 18, 2020. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180304392 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13802951 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 15948357 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11613652 | Dec 2006 | US |
| Child | 13802951 | US |
