The present invention relates to an orthopedic plate and fastener system for fixation of bone, and further in particular to an orthopedic plate and fastener system which can selectably be used without substantial modification to surgical procedure to achieve fixed angle and variable locking of the fasteners, as well as variable angle non-locking of the fasteners, all within the same fastener opening of the plate.
The use of ORIF (Open Reduction, Internal Fixation) has become a mainstay in the treatment of a variety of medical conditions. The corresponding design of orthopedic implants used to achieve this fixation has progressed through the development of plates or other stabilization means, including for example rods and or mesh, intended for application to specific bones, and for use with characteristic types of medical conditions. These plates are optimally designed to correspond to a generalized shape of the bone. The systems that use these plates include fixation means or fasteners, which are usually screws or pegs, that hold the plate to the bone, and further hold fragments of the bone to the plate in association with other fragments so that the fragments will fuse together.
In position on the bone, the plate, fasteners and bone form a “construct” that accepts dynamic loading. The interaction of the fasteners, which are typically screws or pegs, with the bone, and with the plate is a complex matter. Typically, screws include a threaded shaft and pegs may include a threaded shaft or may simply be cylindrical and be devoid of threads about the shaft. Bone has a hard cortical surface and a porous cancellous internal portion and the variable nature of bone must be taken into consideration in the design of an implant system. Further, as bone lives, it reacts to loading and to motion of the fasteners so that threads can loose purchase over time as the bone shifts away from the threads. Further loading between fragments influences fusion of the fragments. Thus, the design of the plate/fastener interface includes considerations of loading as well as accommodation of typical patterns of fragmentation and the intention to capture cortical surfaces and to avoid surrounding soft tissue.
The use of fixation plates generally falls into two categories, the repair of fractures and the reconstruction of degenerative bone pathology. Over time, the sophistication of the implants used to treat these conditions has increased dramatically. Initially, a fixation plate and its associated fasteners were not mechanically fixed to one another. In these early plate and fastener systems the trajectory of the fastener tended to be defined by the trajectory of the fastener hole with in the plate since this would be used to guide the fastener, or drill guide to form the fastener hole within the bone. In this type of fixation, the fasteners pass though the plate and into the bone. Fixation in this type of system is achieved by friction between the bone and the plate/fastener construct, and the construct is referred to as having “non-locking” fixation.
In contrast, fixation plates have developed in which the fasteners are mechanically locked at a predetermined and fixed angle relative to the plate, often through the use of a fastener having a threaded head which mates with internal threads in the fastener holes of the plate. This type of fixation is referred to as “locking fixation.” Locking fasteners have the advantage of being less likely to back out of the plate, or to provide proud surfaces that can result in irritation to surrounding soft tissue. Moreover, in locking plate systems, the angle of the fastener axis relative to the plate, and the length of the screw is determined to account for capture of bone fragments for typical injury or deformation. In some ways this makes the surgeon's job easier in deciding on fastener placement. Often in this mode of fixation, a drill guide is used in conjunction with the fastener hole to drill the fastener hole within the bone.
In the locking plate construct, fixation strength does not rely on the bone and plate interaction. This facilitates the creating of a “bridge” construct that was once only possible by using a large external frame. The majority of internal fixation plates used today are the locking variety. This type of plate is especially useful in patients with low density bone, often the elderly or diabetic, where the necessary screw purchase for a non-locking construct is not present. While these types of plates, known as “locking plates”, have become the standard of care in both reconstructive and trauma plating, there is evidence within the medical community, that there are some potential problems with overly stiff locking constructs. There is growing evidence that some locking constructs have become too stiff to allow for proper bone healing. There is evidence that non-union rates trend higher with extremely rigid stainless steel locking plates when compared to more flexible titanium plates. There have been published studies that suggest that a less rigid but strong construct may be optimal to provide stability while not interfering with the normal fracture healing mechanics and physiology.
“Variable angle” locking technology, often described as “poly-axial”, refers to the ability to choose the angle of the fastener axis relative to the fastener hole within the plate and to lock the fastener at that angle in the plate. This mode of fixation provides the surgeon with the ability to create a rigid construct while allowing the flexibility to place the fixation screws at the optimal trajectory. In this type of fixation, the angle is determined through the use of a drill guide, which sets the angle in the bone. Current solutions on the market do provide the ability to vary the angle of the locking screws, but they do so by significantly compromising the strength of the interaction between the plate and the screw. This creates a greatly weakened overall construct when compared to a traditional fixed angle locking construct. Additionally, the current variable angle locking designs modify both the plate and screw in every, non-compression, hole within the plate. This leaves all of the plate holes compromised even if the nominal angle of the screw hole would have been appropriate.
The present invention addresses the weaknesses of the systems currently on the market. It increases the strength of the variable angle locking mechanism so as to make it more clinically effective. Further, increasing the strength reduces the chance of construct failure and resultant non-union of the fixed bones. This has serious consequences for both the surgeon and the patient being treated. A stronger mechanism will also allow the technology to be deployed beyond the current scope of the prior art products due to this inherent relative weakness. Additionally, initial testing of the present variable locking mechanism demonstrates that the system provides fixation that is stronger but less rigid and the current literature suggests that this may provide a significantly positive impact on fracture union rates.
The variable locking mechanism of the present invention can be used with existing threaded locking plates without change to the plates or the addition of steps to the surgical procedure. The present invention enables three modes of fixation within a single threaded hole, and does not even require any modification to present locking plates or any significant modification to the current surgical procedure used to achieve fixed angle locking. This is accomplished by installing a locking ring into the plate with an installation tool that resembles a traditional locking screw drill guide. This ring will be installed such as by a friction fit on the drill guide, and at the surgeon's discretion the ring driver is used in place of the traditional drill guide. In a further embodiment, the drill guide has a conical opening and a scalloped edge. The ability to add function to an existing system without adding steps or altering the typical flow of the surgical procedure is a critical user need for almost any surgical product and greatly enhances the acceptance and ease with which a new product is adopted.
The present invention also provides a variable angle non-locking fastener, which can similarly be used in the threaded locking holes of existing plates. Fasteners are provided within the same system (and in particular in the same surgical tray), which have a rounded smooth head that is sized to ride on the threads of the fastener hole so as to provide for a variable angle non-locking relationship with the plate. The drill guide is used to set the angle in the bone, which in turn sets the angle relative to the plate. Thus, the present invention provides the surgeon with three modes of fixation (locking fixed angle, locking variable angle and non-locking variable angle) using virtually the same plate, instruments and surgical procedure that the surgeon has become used to for fixed angle locking fixation. The present invention provides the surgeon with the ability in his or her discretion to select the mode of fixation in the operating room as the needs of the patient dictate. Without any significant change to inventory (the plate inventory remains the same, and the change is simply the addition of two types of screws, the locking inserts, the locking insert driver, and a drill guide for the non-locking screws.) The present invention allows the surgeon to decide once he has had a chance to view the open surgical site whether to utilize the strength of a fixed angle lock at a pre-selected angle or to alter the trajectory of the fastener the strength of the relation between the plate and the fastener.
The present invention can be used in any number of surgical applications, including for example, for any orthopedic implant application such as for example for cranio facial plates, trauma plates, small bone plates, long bone plates, and for the spine or pelvis.
The present invention provides a system of orthopedic plates and fasteners which provides for selectable fixation between three modes of fixation, i.e. fixed angle locking fixation, variable angle locking fixation, and non-locking fixation all within a single fastener opening. One aspect of the present invention includes a variable locking assembly that has a locking insert that is threaded into, and thus mechanically seated in, the internally threaded opening in an implant. The locking insert has an annular flange or shoulder that surrounds the opening in the implant on the superior surface, and also has a central through opening that is preferably smooth and hexagonal in cross section to allow the insert to be screwed into the plate opening. The locking insert is made from a biocompatible material that can be deformed by the threads of the fastener head, (i.e. a screw or peg,) so that the fixator is inserted through the locking insert and into the adjacent bone to the point where the proximal head threads interact with the internal opening of the locking insert to cause the material to flow and accept the head of the fastener at any angle (up to ˜20°) while maintaining a rigid construct. Both the minor diameter and the major diameter of the screw head include a taper to improve the locking within the locking insert. Preferably, the major diameter of the threads taper out at a larger angle than the minor diameter, i.e. by a difference of from about 2° to about 20°, preferably from about 5° to about 15°, and preferably about 8° to about 12° degrees of difference so that the threads widen at a greater rate than the head does to improve the strength of the fixation when the fastener is locked into the insert. The invention further includes a tool for insertion of the locking insert into the plate. The insert can be provided on the tool, which has a friction fit, such as a tapered head split that compresses to hold the insert and allow the insert to be threaded into the screw hole of the plate. The tool is advantageously made of plastic, and is a single use device.
The present invention relates to a system of orthopedic plates that also provide for fixed angle locking using the same plate holes as for the variable angle locking. In this case, the fastener includes a threaded head that corresponds to the internal threads of the fastener hole in the plate. In this case, the fixed angle is defined by the angle of the hole in the plate, and the hole and the fastener are co-axial. The system also provides for variable angle non-locking. Thus, the system also includes fasteners that could be used in the same threaded plate holes to hold the plate relative to the bone, but which do not lock the plate to the fastener. Advantageously, these fasteners have convexly rounded heads that are sized to fit within the threaded hole at a variable angle providing for about 20° of conical rotation relative to the longitudinal axis of the fastener hole. Thus, the invention relates to a surgical tray or caddy that includes orthopedic plates which have internally threaded fastener holes, a variable locking insert which threads into the threaded fastener hole and which has a through opening and an externally threaded fastener that can be inserted into the locking insert to deform the surface of the through opening to lock the fastener at a selected angle relative to the fastener hole, and at least one of a fastener having a head with threads that are capable of mating with the threads of the fastener hole or a fastener that has a convexly rounded surface that is sized to fit with the fastener hole and hold the plate but also to allow for a variable angle position of the fastener within the fastener hole.
The plate generally has a top side, or side which faces away from the bone in use, with a generally constant through thickness to a bottom side, or side that faces toward the bone in use. The plate can be planar, or have another topography, according to the application, although the through hole portion 22 must have a topography that allows the through hole of being capable of receiving the locking insert 16 and the threads 24 of the hole are capable of mating with the external threads 32 of the body 34 of the locking insert or the head of a fastener designed for fixed angle locking (or alternatively of mating with the external threads 132 on the head 134 of a locking screw 120.) As illustrated in
The locking insert is made from a biocompatible material such as PEEK polymer (i.e., polyether ether ketone) or other suitable biocompatible polymer, that is softer than the screw so that when the screw head is screwed into the locking insert, the external threads will cause the surface of the internal opening 38 to flow or deform to form threads in the locking insert, causing the screw to lock into position relative to the plate in the locking insert. Also advantageously, the locking insert 16 is provided in the surgical tray pre-mounted on a locking insert driver tool 160 shown in
The present invention is novel in providing a surgical caddy that includes a plate with threaded hole and a variable locking assembly that has a threaded deformable locking insert and a fastener having a threaded head that can be inserted in the locking insert to lock it into position, and either or both a locking fastener that has a threaded head that locks into the threaded hole to lock the fastener at a fixed angle, or a variable locking fastener that has a convexly rounded head that is sized to fit within the threaded hole so that the non-locking fastener can be inserted at a variable angle, but which secures the plate to the bone, but is not mechanically coupled to the plate. Thus, the surgeon is provided with a single plate, basically a single surgical procedure with very little change to provide selectable fixation by choosing the fastener.
Testing was performed on the variable locking mechanism of the present invention showing cyclic loading of the variable locking assembly of the present invention at an applied load of 35, 55, and 67.5 Newtons at a run cycle to failure or one million cycles. Only one of the assemblies of the present invention failed below the test end, i.e. at more than 300,000 cycles, while the majority of the comparative product failed at an average of 22,000 with loading at 55 N. The test results are shown below in Table 1.
While in accordance with the patent statutes the best mode and preferred embodiment have been set forth, the scope of the invention is not limited thereto, but rather by the scope of the attached claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/827,940, filed Aug. 17, 2015, which is a Divisional Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/932,970, filed Mar. 10, 2011, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/339,857, filed on Mar. 10, 2010, herein fully incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4456010 | Reimels et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
5134909 | Sasaki | Aug 1992 | A |
5531746 | Errico et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5876402 | Errico et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5954722 | Bono | Sep 1999 | A |
6022350 | Ganem | Feb 2000 | A |
6030389 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6206881 | Frigg et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6322562 | Wolter | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331179 | Freid et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6454760 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6485520 | Hubach et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6623486 | Weaver et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6679883 | Hawkes et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6902567 | Del Medico | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6955677 | Dahners | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964664 | Fried et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7052499 | Steger | May 2006 | B2 |
7141051 | Janowski et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175624 | Konieczynski et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7179260 | Gerlach et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201753 | Sclapfer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7229443 | Eberlein et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7325470 | Steger et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7914561 | Konieczynski et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8460306 | Schaffran et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020058939 | Wagner et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062127 | Schumacher et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020128654 | Steger et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040073218 | Dahners | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040153073 | Orbay | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050033298 | Hawkes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050080421 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050143742 | Porcher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149040 | Haines et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050277937 | Leung et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060106398 | Lauryssen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116678 | Impellizzeri | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149265 | James et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189990 | Farris et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200148 | Matthys | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235400 | Schneider | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241618 | Gasser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070083207 | Ziolo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088360 | Orbay et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070162016 | Matityahu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162147 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070233116 | Olerud | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080009870 | Lombardo et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058817 | Eberlein et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080114359 | Murner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119895 | Manceau | May 2008 | A1 |
20080234677 | Dahners et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234749 | Forstein | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080306550 | Matityahu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018557 | Pisharodi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018588 | Eckhof et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036932 | Rouyer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048605 | Yurek | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090192549 | Sanders | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248087 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292318 | White et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299369 | Orbay et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312803 | Austin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030277 | Haidukewych et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057138 | Murner et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069969 | Ampuero et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082070 | Diez | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110098754 | Hulliger et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004096067 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2004096067 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2006102110 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006103245 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2010138260 | Dec 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190059962 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61339857 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12932970 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14827940 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14827940 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 16170184 | US |