This application relates generally to the identification of turbulence. More particularly, this application relates to the identification of levels of turbulence by hazard warning systems.
Hazardous weather generally includes turbulence. Hazard warning systems are often configured to detect turbulence and utilized in a variety of applications including vehicle weather warning systems, such as aircraft weather warning systems (e.g., aircraft weather radar systems). With the large amount of air traffic and rising fuel costs, pilots are interested in identifying levels of turbulence so they do not unnecessarily avoid flight routes through non-hazardous weather. Turbulence levels above certain thresholds can be dangerous to the aircraft, crew and passengers and/or cause significant discomfort, while lower levels of turbulence may only affect ride quality of the flight. Accordingly, accurate identification and display of turbulence and its levels are desirable.
Pilots generally rely upon avionic weather radar systems to detect turbulence. Weather radar systems generally include an antenna, a receiver/transmitter circuit, a processor, and display. The processor is coupled between the display and the receiver/transmitter circuit. The receiver/transmitter circuit is coupled between the processor and the antenna. The processor commands transmit signals through the receiver/transmitter circuit to the antenna to transmit radar beams. The processor receives radar return signals derived from radar returns received by the antenna. The radar return signals are provided to the processor via the receiver/transmitter circuit.
Conventionally, the radar return signals are processed to provide graphical images to a radar display. The radar display is typically a color display providing graphical images in color to represent the severity of weather. Some aircraft systems also include other hazard warning systems such as a turbulence detection system. The turbulence detection system can provide indications of the presence of turbulence or other hazards on the display and can be part of the weather radar system.
Conventional aircraft hazard weather radar systems, such as the WXR 2100 MultiScan™ radar system manufactured by Rockwell Collins, Inc., have Doppler capabilities and are capable of detecting at least four parameters: weather range, weather reflectivity, weather velocity, and weather spectral width or velocity variation. The weather reflectivity is typically scaled to and displayed as green, yellow, and red color levels that are related to rainfall rate. The radar-detected radial velocity variation or spectral width can be scaled to a turbulence level and displayed as magenta.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525 discloses the display of levels of turbulence on a weather radar display using speckled or dotted areas. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standard TSO C63d specifies that if two levels of turbulence are displayed, the severe turbulence area must be distinguished from the lighter level of turbulence.
Thus, there is a need for a system for and/or a method of more accurate display of turbulence. There is also need for a system that can display levels of turbulence in a readily identifiable fashion. There is also a need for ensuring that even small areas of high turbulence are displayed and identifiable. There is also a need to display small areas of higher turbulence when they are located in larger regions of ride quality turbulence. Yet further, there is a need for a aircraft hazard warning system optimized to highlight at least one higher level of turbulence.
It would be desirable to provide a system and/or method that provides one or more of these or other advantageous features. Other features and advantages will be made apparent from the present specification. The teachings disclosed extend to those embodiments which fall within the scope of the appended claims, regardless of whether they accomplish one or more of the aforementioned needs.
One embodiment of the disclosure relates to a method of displaying areas of turbulent weather. The method comprises processing data representative of weather, displaying the weather conditions on a display, and detecting turbulence. The method also comprises providing at least one first graphical element on the display. The first graphical element has a first size and a first location representing a size and a location of the turbulence at a first level, the first level being below a threshold. The method also comprises providing at least one second graphical element on the display. The second graphical element has a second size and second location representing a size and a location of the turbulence at a second level, the second level being above the threshold. The second size of the second graphical element has: 1. a minimal displayable size 2. is determined using an inflation factor, or 3. both has a minimal displayable size and is determined using an inflation factor.
Another embodiment of the disclosure relates to an avionics weather display system. The avionics weather display system comprises a processor for processing weather radar data representative of weather conditions, and an avionic display for displaying graphical elements representing the weather conditions in response to the processor. The processor detects turbulence and causes the display to provide at least one first graphical element. The first graphical element has a first size and a first location representing a size and a location of the turbulence at a first level, the first level being below a threshold. The processor causes the display to provide at least one second graphical element. The second graphical element has a second size and second location representing a size and a location of the turbulence at a second level, the second level being above the threshold. The second size of the second graphical element has a minimal displayable size or is determined using an inflation factor.
Another embodiment of the disclosure relates to a program for an avionics weather display system stored on a non-transitory medium. The program includes instructions for causing at least one electronic processor to:
The embodiments will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:
Before describing in detail the particular improved system and method, it should be observed that the invention includes, but is not limited to a novel structural combination of conventional data/signal processing components, and not in the particular detailed configurations thereof. Accordingly, the structure, methods, functions, control and arrangement of conventional components, software, and circuits have, for the most part, been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable block representations and schematic diagrams, in order not to obscure the disclosure with structural details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, having the benefit of the description herein. Further, the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments depicted in the exemplary diagrams, but should be construed in accordance with the language in the claims.
An aircraft hazard warning system or other avionic system may detect and/or infer turbulence and display levels of turbulence on a display in one embodiment. The hazard warning system can provide indications of levels of turbulence over indications of reflectivity in one embodiment. In one embodiment, lower levels of turbulence (e.g., ride through turbulence) are indicated by speckled or dotted regions of magenta superimposed over the display of weather; the speckled regions allow the underlying weather to be viewed in one embodiment. Advantageously, superimposition of speckled regions allows pilots to view underlying precipitation rates associated with the weather on the display in one embodiment. Higher levels of turbulence are shown by solid magenta and hide the underlying precipitation rates in one embodiment. Although specific types of indicators of levels of turbulence or graphical representations are described herein, other types of representations and symbols can be utilized without departing from the scope of the invention.
According to one embodiment, solid magenta regions representing a higher level of turbulence are increased in size if they are below a minimum size so that they are not mistaken for magenta speckles or dots associated with the regions of lower levels of turbulence. According to another embodiment, an inflation factor can be utilized for regions of graphical symbols of higher levels of turbulence. The inflation factor can be a function of peak turbulence within a given radius, turbulence detection density (e.g., the number of turbulence detections which exceed a threshold of any given radius), a filtered peak turbulence within a given region, or a combination of these as explained below. The inflation factor is used to increase the size of the turbulence area at the higher level by expanding the region according to any type of graphical expansion algorithm according to one embodiment.
As described below, turbulence areas may be determined by any number of algorithms and detection schemes including those described in the patents incorporated herein by reference. The specific method of turbulence detection does not limit the claims. Both inferred turbulence detection and actual turbulence detection using spectral width can utilize the principles of the present invention without departing from the scope of the claims.
Generally, a weather radar system or hazard warning system 10 can be configured to provide hazard warnings, such as turbulence warnings. Alternatively, other turbulence related parameters can be used to determine the level of turbulence. Further, more than two levels of turbulence can be determined and displayed.
The turbulence and the levels associated with the turbulence can be detected by processor 14 as described below. Processor 14 includes one or both of a direct turbulence detection module or detector 28 and an inferred turbulence detection module or detector 29. The calculation of the g load for turbulence can be calculated using a number of algorithms including algorithms which utilize aircraft weight, wing loading, altitude, and airspeed and other parameters as well as spectral width. An indication of a higher level of turbulence such as a solid magenta area on a display 16 corresponding to the size and location of the higher level of turbulence can be provided by processor 14 and a turbulence graphics module 30.
In one embodiment, processor 14 employs a radar turbulence detection algorithms as determined through regulatory guidance to provide detection and alerting of turbulence levels above 0.3 g RMS vertical load. A radar threshold for detection can correspond to about 0.2 g to 0.22 g which allows detections of 0.3 g events (i.e., probability of detection of about 85%). Setting the threshold to 0.2 g to 0.22 g also allows the radar to reject false alerts where true vertical load is less than 0.3 g (i.e., probability of false alert to be less than 20%). These statistics can be dictated by regulatory guidance.
Turbulence below the 0.2 or 0.22 g load threshold and above a nominal value (e.g., 0.1 g) are provided as magenta speckled or dotted regions on display 16 by processor 14 and module 30 in one embodiment. The magenta speckled regions correspond to the size and shape of the lower level turbulence regions. To avoid confusion of a solid magenta representation with a magenta speckle or dot of a speckled region, a minimum display size for a solid magenta representation can be utilized for detections of turbulence above the threshold in one embodiment. The minimum display size can be a fixed number of pixels (e.g., four or more, eight or more, etc.) or a number of pixels associated with a geographic area (e.g., a one-half nautical mile (nm), 1 mile, etc.). The speckle or dot in the speckled magenta region can be one pixel in one embodiment.
In addition, or alternatively, the graphical indication of the higher level of turbulence can be subjected to an inflation factor which increases the size of the solid magenta representation in other embodiments. The inflation factor can be computed by a number of algorithms within module 30. The algorithms can include one or more or a combination of a peak turbulence within a given radius algorithm, a turbulence detection density algorithm, a filtered peak turbulence within a given radius algorithm. The filter can be a spatial filter in range and azimuth or Cartesian coordinates. Alternatively, temporal filters are possible.
Referring to
Processor 14 is generally configured to process data received from sensor inputs 12 to determine turbulence levels and provide turbulence level indications on display 16. Processor 14 can include turbulence detector 28, inferred turbulence detector 29, and module 30 which cooperate to provide graphical indications of levels of turbulence on display 16 in one embodiment. Alternatively, processor 14 uses radar return signals from antenna 22 and detector 28 to detect size, level, and location of turbulence and does not include detector 29.
Processor 14 can generate a velocity parameter 32 or other Doppler data, a spectral width parameter 34, a reflectivity parameter 36, and a range parameter 38 based on return data from sensor inputs 12, data or commands from user input 18, or data or instructions from memory 20. According to various exemplary embodiments, processor 14 can be any hardware and/or software processor or processing architecture capable of executing instructions and operating on data related to hazard detection and display. According to various exemplary embodiments, memory 20 can be any volatile or non-volatile memory capable of storing data and/or instructions related to hazard warning system 10.
Direct turbulence detector 28 is configured to provide turbulence data based on a direct measurement of spectral width, for example spectral width parameter 34, from radar antenna 22. A large spectral width corresponds to turbulence. Direct turbulence detector 28 can provide a turbulence hazard indication on display 16. In one embodiment, turbulence is detected in accordance with TSO-C63d.
Inferred turbulence detector 29 is configured to provide inferred or unmeasured turbulence data using measured data. Inferred turbulence detector 29 can receive data inputs derived from one or more of spectral width parameter 34, reflectivity parameter 36, and/or range parameter 38.
Inferred turbulence detector 29 can also receive temperature data from temperature sensor 26 and data from lightning detector 24. Temperature data can include a local atmospheric temperature, local temperature variations with time, local temperature variations with altitude, a remotely determined temperature, and/or remotely determined temperature gradients in either range or altitude. Processor 14 can also include a cell tracking module.
Display 16 provides graphical representations of weather and hazards. The current regulatory environment as defined by governmental regulatory agencies supports display of basic radar sensor information as red, yellow, and green for radar reflectivity calibrated to rainfall rate and magenta as turbulence. Indications of turbulence levels are provided so that higher turbulence areas are readily ascertainable in one embodiment. The higher turbulence areas can be made larger than the area actually detected or inferred to distinguish from smaller lower levels of turbulence in one embodiment.
Display 16 can be any device for providing graphical representations of weather. Display 16 can be a multifunctional display of any technology, a stand alone display, a hand held display, etc. Display 16 can be a head down liquid crystal display, a head up display, a helmet display, etc. In one embodiment, display 16 is an avionic display.
With reference to
At a step 204, module 30 determines if each representation of higher turbulence is above a minimal display size. If so, module 30 advances to a display step 208. If not, module 30 advances to step 204 and makes the representation a minimal display size. The representation can be expanded by increasing its radius or increasing its perimeter. In one embodiment, radial expansion about a center of the regions can be utilized. Alternatively, expansion in one or more dimensions can be utilized.
At a step 208, module 30 causes display 16 to display the representation (such as by filling a graphic memory or frame buffer). After step 208, system 10 or processor 14 returns to step 202. Display 16 can display the representation increased in step 206 as well as other representations of lower levels of turbulence and representations of higher levels of turbulence that did not need an increase of size in step 206.
The minimal display size can be defined as a minimum number of pixels in one embodiment. In one embodiment, the minimum number of pixels is great enough to distinguish from the pixels used to provide a speckle in a speckled region indicating lower levels of turbulence. In one embodiment, the minimum number of pixels is 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, etc. According to another embodiment, the representation can be increased to represent minimum distance associated with a geographic distance such as a one-half nautical mile or one nautical mile radius. The minimum display size of the representation can be related to the size and/or resolution of display 16.
With reference to
According to an alternative embodiment, module 30 can employ filtering to reduce flashing on display 16 due to sudden changes in turbulence levels or density. A filtered peak turbulence within a given radius, or some combination of filtering with the above approaches can be utilized to create the inflation factor. The filtering can be a temporal or spatial filter (e.g., range and azimuth).
At a step 304, the region of higher turbulence is inflated using the inflation factor. The inflations factor may indicate a percentage increase in area (e.g., 110 percent, 200 percent, 300 percent, etc). A graphical expansion algorithm uses the inflation factor to increase the size of the representation of higher turbulence. The representation can be increased or augmented in a radial fashion, in an X and Y direction, or a unilateral direction. The representation can be increased in area according to various shapes (e.g., pie-shaped, square-shaped, rectangular, circular, oval-shaped, etc.). In one alternative embodiment the representation can be extended by connecting it to a neighboring representation if the density of higher turbulence is large.
At a step 308, module 30 determines if the region of higher turbulence is above a maximum display size. If so, module 30 advances to a step 310. If not, module advances to step 208. The maximum size can be selectable. At step 310, module 300 adjusts the inflation factor and resizes the representation with the new inflation factor in step 304. Steps 308 and 310 prevents erroneous augmentation of representations such that the turbulence region is not increased too large, such as filling an entire screen or large portions of the screen of display 16. Further, excessively large augmentation of turbulence regions may result in the pilot unnecessarily avoiding an area.
With reference to
According to various exemplary embodiments, the process flow of
With reference to
A graphical representation 606 can represent turbulence of a higher level. Representation 606 is shown as solid magenta which blocks the color of the weather regions underneath representation 606 in one embodiment. A graphical representation 614 of a ride through turbulence region is embodied as a speckled region and shows the color of weather region 602 beneath representation 614. A representation 624 is similar to representations 604 and 614. In order to distinguish between representation 606 and speckles of magenta in representation 614, module 40 ensures that representation 606 is of sufficient size to distinguish it from magenta speckles associated with symbol or representations 604, 614. and 624. Representations 604, 606, 614, and 624 are depicted in accordance with the size and location of their corresponding sensed turbulence regions, however, the size of representation 606 may adjusted as described herein to improve readability according to one embodiment.
With reference to
The weather depiction in
With reference to
With reference to
While the detailed drawings, specific examples, detailed algorithms and particular configurations given describe preferred and exemplary embodiments, they serve the purpose of illustration only. The inventions disclosed are not limited to the specific forms shown. For example, the methods may be performed in any of a variety of sequence of steps or according to any of a variety of mathematical formulas. The graphic representations shown are exemplary only. The hardware and software configurations shown and described may differ depending on the chosen performance characteristics and physical characteristics of the weather radar and processing devices. For example, the type of system components and their interconnections may differ. The systems and methods depicted and described are not limited to the precise details and conditions disclosed. The flow charts show preferred exemplary operations only. The specific data types, graphical symbols and operations are shown in a non-limiting fashion. Furthermore, other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/760,964, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,907,817, filed Feb. 6, 2013, entitled “SYSTEM FOR AND METHOD OF DISPLAYING LEVELS OF TURBULENCE” by Finley et al., and is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/075,103, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,902,100, filed on Mar. 7, 2008, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TURBULENCE DETECTION” by Woodell et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,087, U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,219, U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,902, U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525 (Rexam Control No. 95/001,860), and U.S. Pat. No. 7,129,885 which are all herein incorporated by reference in their entireties and assigned to the assignee of the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3251057 | Buehler et al. | May 1966 | A |
3359557 | Fow et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3404396 | Buchler et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3465339 | Marner | Sep 1969 | A |
3491358 | Hicks | Jan 1970 | A |
3508259 | Andrews | Apr 1970 | A |
3540829 | Collinson et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3567915 | Altshuler et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3646555 | Atlas | Feb 1972 | A |
3715748 | Hicks | Feb 1973 | A |
3764719 | Dell | Oct 1973 | A |
3781530 | Britland et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3781878 | Kirkpatrick | Dec 1973 | A |
3803609 | Lewis et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3885237 | Kirkpatrick | May 1975 | A |
3943511 | Evans et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3964064 | Brandao et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3968490 | Gostin | Jul 1976 | A |
4015257 | Fetter | Mar 1977 | A |
4043194 | Tanner | Aug 1977 | A |
4223309 | Payne | Sep 1980 | A |
4283715 | Choisnet | Aug 1981 | A |
4283725 | Chisholm | Aug 1981 | A |
4318100 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4346595 | Frosch et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4430654 | Kupfer | Feb 1984 | A |
4435707 | Clark | Mar 1984 | A |
4459592 | Long | Jul 1984 | A |
4533915 | Lucchi et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4555703 | Cantrell | Nov 1985 | A |
4600925 | Alitz et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4613938 | Hansen et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4649388 | Atlas | Mar 1987 | A |
4658255 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4684950 | Long | Aug 1987 | A |
4742353 | D'Addio et al. | May 1988 | A |
4761650 | Masuda et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4835536 | Piesinger et al. | May 1989 | A |
RE33152 | Atlas | Jan 1990 | E |
4914444 | Pifer et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4928131 | Onozawa | May 1990 | A |
4940987 | Frederick | Jul 1990 | A |
5028929 | Sand et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036334 | Henderson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5049886 | Seitz et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5059967 | Roos | Oct 1991 | A |
5077558 | Kuntman | Dec 1991 | A |
5111400 | Yoder | May 1992 | A |
5159407 | Churnside et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5164731 | Borden et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5173704 | Buehler et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177487 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5198819 | Susnjara | Mar 1993 | A |
5202690 | Frederick | Apr 1993 | A |
5208600 | Rubin | May 1993 | A |
5262773 | Gordon | Nov 1993 | A |
5291208 | Young | Mar 1994 | A |
5296865 | Lewis | Mar 1994 | A |
5311183 | Mathews et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311184 | Kuntman | May 1994 | A |
5331330 | Susnjara | Jul 1994 | A |
5396220 | Markson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5469168 | Anderson | Nov 1995 | A |
5479173 | Yoshioka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485157 | Long | Jan 1996 | A |
5517193 | Allison et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521603 | Young | May 1996 | A |
5534868 | Gjessing et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5568151 | Merritt | Oct 1996 | A |
5583972 | Miller | Dec 1996 | A |
5592171 | Jordan | Jan 1997 | A |
5602543 | Prata et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5648782 | Albo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654700 | Prata et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657009 | Gordon | Aug 1997 | A |
5686919 | Jordan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5726656 | Frankot | Mar 1998 | A |
5757322 | Ray et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771020 | Markson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5828332 | Frederick | Oct 1998 | A |
5839080 | Muller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5907568 | Reitan, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
5920276 | Frederick | Jul 1999 | A |
5945926 | Ammar et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973635 | Albo | Oct 1999 | A |
6081220 | Fujisaka et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6138060 | Conner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154151 | McElreath et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154169 | Kuntman | Nov 2000 | A |
6177873 | Cragun | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184816 | Zheng et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201494 | Kronfeld | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208284 | Woodell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236351 | Conner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240369 | Foust | May 2001 | B1 |
6246367 | Markson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6289277 | Feyereisen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297772 | Lewis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308122 | Nishizaki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340946 | Wolfson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6381538 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388607 | Woodell | May 2002 | B1 |
6388608 | Woodell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
RE37725 | Yamada | Jun 2002 | E |
6405134 | Smith et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424288 | Woodell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456226 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480142 | Rubin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489915 | Lines et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496252 | Whiteley | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512476 | Woodell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518914 | Peterson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549161 | Woodell | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560538 | Schwinn et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563452 | Zheng et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577947 | Kronfeld et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6590520 | Steele et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597305 | Szeto et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603425 | Woodell | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606564 | Schwinn et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614382 | Cannaday et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650275 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650972 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667710 | Cornell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670908 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677886 | Lok | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683609 | Baron et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690317 | Szeto et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703945 | Kuntman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720906 | Szeto et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738010 | Steele et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741203 | Woodell | May 2004 | B1 |
6744382 | Lapis et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771207 | Lang | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788043 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791311 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6828923 | Anderson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839018 | Szeto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850185 | Woodell | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856908 | Devarasetty et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6879280 | Bull et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882302 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6917860 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6977608 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7030805 | Ormesher et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042387 | Ridenour et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7082382 | Rose et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7109912 | Paramore et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109913 | Paramore et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7116266 | Vesel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7129885 | Woodell et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7132974 | Christianson | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139664 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145503 | Abramovich et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161525 | Finley et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7200491 | Rose et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7242343 | Woodell | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7259714 | Cataldo | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7292178 | Woodell et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7307576 | Koenigs | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307577 | Kronfeld et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307583 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7307756 | Walmsley | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7352317 | Finley et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7352929 | Hagen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372394 | Woodell et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7383131 | Wey et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7417579 | Woodell | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7486219 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7486220 | Kronfeld et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7492304 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7492305 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7515087 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7515088 | Woodell et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7528613 | Thompson et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7541971 | Woodell et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7576680 | Woodell | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7598901 | Tillotson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7598902 | Woodell et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7609200 | Woodell et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7616150 | Woodell | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7633431 | Wey et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7639175 | Woodell | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7696921 | Finley et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7714767 | Kronfeld et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7843380 | Woodell | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7859448 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7859449 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7889117 | Woodell et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7917255 | Finley | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7973698 | Woodell et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8072368 | Woodell | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8248274 | Christophe et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8515600 | McCusker | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8902100 | Woodell et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8907817 | Finley et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
20030001770 | Cornell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016156 | Szeto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050049789 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060036366 | Kelly et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070018974 | Fujiwara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090251356 | Margomenos | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100327068 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130207274 | Liu et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140145883 | Baks et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 329 738 | Jul 2003 | EP |
2658617 | Aug 1991 | FR |
WO-9807047 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO-9822834 | May 1998 | WO |
WO-03005060 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-2009137158 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Action Closing Prosecution (37 CFR 1.949) in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, mail date Nov. 15, 2012, 62 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 24, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/978,680 (3 pages). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, mail date Nov. 8, 2010, 3 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, mail date Oct. 15, 2010, 3 pages. |
AN/APG Active Electronically Scanned Array AESA, www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/an-apg-aesa.htm, retrieved on Feb. 26, 2013, 6 pages. |
Bovith et al., Detecting Weather Radar Clutter by Information Fusion with Satellite Images and Numerical Weather Prediction Model Output; Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2006, 4 pages. |
Burnham et al., Thunderstorm Turbulence and Its Relationship to Weather Radar Echoes, J. Aircraft, Sep.-Oct. 1969, 8 pages. |
Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS), www.ll.mit.edu/mission/aviation/faawxsystems/ciws.html, received on Aug. 19, 2009, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/183,314, filed Jul. 14, 2011, Sishtla et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/781,449, filed Feb. 28, 2013, West et al. |
Decision on Appeal for Inter Parties Reexamination Control No. 95/001,860, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 17 pages. |
Doviak et al., Doppler Radar and Weather Observations, 1984, 298 pages. |
Dupree et al.,FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting in the United States National Airspace, 29 pages. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, mail date Aug. 20, 2013, 3 pages. |
Exhibits Filed by Third Party in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, filed May 30, 2012, 7 pages. |
Goodman et al., LISDAD Lightning Observations during the Feb. 22-23, 1998 Central Florida Tornado Outbreak, http:www.srh.noaa.gov/topics/attach/html/ssd98-37.htm, Jun. 1, 1998, 5 pages. |
Hodanish, Integration of Lightning Detection Systems in a Modernized National Weather Service Office, http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mlb/hoepub.html, retrieved on Aug. 6, 2007, 5 pages. |
Honeywell, RDR-4B Forward Looking Windshear Detection/Weather Radar System User's Manual With Radar Operation Guidelines (Rev. 6) Jul. 2003, 106 pages. |
Keith, Transport Category Airplane Electronic Display Systems, Jul. 16, 1987, 34 pages. |
Klingle-Wilson et al., Description of Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS) Weather Products, Aug. 1, 2005, 120 pages. |
Kuntman et al., Turbulence Detection and Avoidance System, International Air Safety Seminar, Oct. 29, 2000, 13 pages. |
Kuntman, Daryal, “Airborne System to Address Leading Cause of Injuries in Non-Fatal Airline Accidents,” ICAO Journal, vol. 5, No. 2, Mar. 2000, 4 pages. |
Meteorological/KSC/L71557/Lighting Detection and Ranging (LDAR), Jan. 2002, 12 pages. |
Nathanson, Fred E., “Radar and Its Composite Environment,” Radar Design Principles, Signal Processing and the Environment, 1969, 5 pages, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York et al. |
Non-Final Office Action in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, mail date Mar. 2, 2012, 28 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, mail date Jul. 28, 2005, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, mail date May 27, 2009, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, mail date Dec. 30, 2008, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, mail date Nov. 4, 2008, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/515,642, mail date Jun. 24, 2010, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,651, mail date Sep. 23, 2011, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,091, mail date Mar. 19, 2012, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,196 mailed on Apr. 19, 2010. |
Notice of Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, dated Mar. 4, 2013, 2 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, mail date Aug. 21, 2007, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, mail date Jan. 14, 2004, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/631,253, mail date Jun. 30, 2004, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, mail date Dec. 5, 2006, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, mail date Jul. 28, 2008, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/256,845, mail date Jun. 22, 2006, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, mail date Aug. 15, 2007, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, mail date Dec. 4, 2007, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,085, mail date Oct. 9, 2008, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, mail date Jul. 17, 2008, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, mail date Mar. 29, 2007, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, mail date Oct. 26, 2006, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,434, mail date Sep. 20, 2007, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/515,642, mail date Dec. 22, 2008, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/515,642, mail date Feb. 12, 2008, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/515,642, mail date Jan. 5, 2010, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, mail date Feb. 26, 2010, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, mail date Jul. 29, 2010, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, mail date Jun. 20, 2012, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,103, mail date Nov. 29, 2012, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,091, mail date Aug. 18, 2011, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,091, mail date Feb. 25, 2011, 6 pages. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,964 Dated Apr. 23, 2014, 7 pages. |
Order Granting Request for Inter Parties Reexamination in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, mail date Mar. 2, 2012, 21 pages. |
Original Request for Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525 filed by Honeywell International Inc., and supporting exhibits in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, filed Dec. 21, 2011. |
Patent Owner's Response to Board Decision in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860 including Exhibits A, B, and C, filed Nov. 17, 2014, 65 pages. |
Patent Owner's Response to Office Action in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860 filed May 1, 2012, 57 pages. |
Pessi et al., On the Relationship Between Lightning and Convective Rainfall Over the Central Pacific Ocean, date unknown, 9 pages. |
Respondent's Brief in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, filed Jun. 21, 2013, 29 pages. |
Right of Appeal Notice in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, mail date Feb. 22, 2013, 63 pages. |
Third Party Requester Comments submitted by Honeywell International Inc. in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, 34 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Brief on Appeal in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, filed May 22, 2013, 46 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Rebuttal Brief in Inter Parties Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,161,525, control No. 95/001,860, filed Sep. 20, 2013, 21 pages. |
Waldvogel et al., The Kinetic Energy of Hailfalls. Part I: Hailstone Spectra, Journal of Applied Meteorology, Apr. 1978, 8 pages. |
Wilson et al., The Complementary Use of Titan-Derived Radar and Total Lightning Thunderstorm Cells, 10 pages. |
Zipser et al., The Vertical Profile of Radar Reflectivity and Convective Cells: A Strong Indicator of Storm Intensity and Lightning Probability? America Meteorological Society, 1994, 9 pages. |
Dupree et al.,FAA Tactical Weather Forecasting in the United States National Airspace, Proceedings from the World Weather Research Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short Term Forecasts, Toulouse, France, 2005, 29 pages. |
Ex-Parte Quayle Action Received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/781,449, dated Dec. 24, 2014, 6 pages. |
Wilson et al., The Complementary Use of Titan-Derived Radar and Total Lightning Thunderstorm Cells, paper presented on Oct. 16, 2005, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,934 dated Nov. 25, 2015, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13760964 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14549142 | US |