System for and methods of controlling user access to applications and/or programs of a computer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9465955
  • Patent Number
    9,465,955
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 16, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 11, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A system includes an application access manager driver and an operating system (OS) kernel module in a kernel-mode address space of an OS. The system also includes application modules, a public application whitelist, a public application whitelist manager, a user/group application whitelist, and a user/group application whitelist manager in a user-mode address space of the OS. A method includes receiving a request to launch an application, calling a “create process” function in the OS kernel module, calling a pre-registered “create process” callback function to the application access manager driver, and determining whether the application is allowed to execute based on whether the application access manager driver identifies the application as an allowable process in either public application whitelist or user/group application whitelist.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field


Various inventive embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to computer security applications. In particular, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a system for and methods of controlling user access to applications and/or programs of a computer.


2. Background


In a shared computing environment, multiple users are accessing a common computer, such as a server, either directly or remotely via a network connection. Often in a shared computing environment most of the computer's files, programs, processes, and resources may be accessed or browsed by the users. However, certain files, programs, processes, and resources may be sensitive in nature and it may be desired to restrict users' access. Therefore, security measures are implemented on shared computers that attempt to provide isolation between users and thereby prevent one user from accessing another user's data and/or from performing any unauthorized actions. Currently, computer operating systems provide security features by which an administrator of a shared computer may configure each user (i.e., grant permissions or specify restrictions). However, there may be a great deal of complexity associated with using these security features. Therefore, the process of configuring the security settings of multiple users may be very difficult and time consuming.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various inventive embodiments disclosed herein, both as to its organization and manner of operation, together with further objectives and advantages, may be best understood by reference to the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings as set forth below:



FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a computer that includes security features for controlling user access to applications and/or programs, according to the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 illustrates a flow diagram of a method of defining public access to computer applications and/or programs, according to the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of a method of defining user-specific and group-specific access to computer programs, according to the present disclosure;



FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a method of initializing public access to computer programs, according to the present disclosure;



FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a method of initializing user-specific and group-specific access to computer programs, according to the present disclosure; and



FIG. 6 illustrates a flow diagram of a method of enforcing access restrictions to computer applications and/or programs, according to the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The disclosure provides a system with improved security features for controlling user access to applications and/or programs, and more particularly to limiting or restricting user access to applications and/or programs of a computer. The system of the invention exhibits numerous advantages over existing systems. In various embodiments, the system and associated methods may provide a simple process by which an administrator may specify a list of allowable applications and/or programs. Further, in some embodiments, the system of the invention may be configured such that a data structure of allowable applications and/or programs are more readily available to an operating system kernel module. The system and methods of the invention provide isolation between different users and sessions, such that one user accessing a shared computer cannot access other user's data and/or perform any unauthorized actions.



FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a computer 100 that includes security features for controlling user access to applications and/or programs, and more particularly to limiting or restricting user access to applications and/or programs of computer 100. Computer 100 includes an operating system (OS) 110 such as Windows® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash., USA) or Linux. OS 110 segregates virtual memory into a kernel-mode address space 120 (i.e., kernel space) and a user-mode address space 150 (i.e., user space). In general terms, kernel space is reserved for running an OS kernel, kernel extensions, and most device drivers. In contrast, user space is the memory area in which user mode applications operate.


Although not explicitly shown in FIG. 1, those skilled in the art will recognize that computer 100 includes other components, such as input/output devices (e.g., mouse, keyboard, display, touch screen), primary and/or secondary storage medium or memory, a central processing unit (CPU), a communications bus, a network connection, and the like. Additionally, computer 100 may be accessed by one or more users/groups 190. In one example, computer 100 may be a host computer or centralized server that users/groups 190 may access remotely via a network (not shown). In other example, computer 100 may be a shared public computer that is accessed directly by one or more users/groups 190. In yet another example, computer 100 may be accessed either directly or via a remote connection. In any case, users/groups 190 may be granted access to computer 100 using a login and authentication process.


An operating system (OS) kernel module 124 and an application access manager driver 128 are loaded into kernel-mode address space 120. In embodiments in which OS 110 of computer 100 is the Microsoft Windows OS, OS kernel module 124 may be NTOSKRNL.EXE. Application access manager driver 128 may be implemented in the form of a kernel dynamic link library (DLL) or driver. OS kernel module 124 communicates with application access manager driver 128 using software calls referred to as callbacks, as will be further described herein.


This disclosure may relate to application publishing. The functionality of a server application shall be visible to and accessible by a client via a network. For example, server application may be a computer-aided design (CAD) application, such as AutoCAD (Autodesk, Inc., San Rafael, Calif., USA) or Cadence Virtuoso (Cadence Design Systems, San Jose, Calif.); a medical clinical workflow application such as Symbia.net (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany); an interactive mapping application such as Google Earth (Google, Inc.) or a 3D game. The functionality of the server application shall be visible to and accessible by the client via a network. For example, the functionality of a server application may be accessed from a client using a process herein known as application publishing, which is currently supported by products such as GraphOn GO-Global, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services and Citrix XenApp. Such application publishing may be performed in accordance with teachings of commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,609, filed Jun. 6, 1995, entitled “Method and system for dynamic translation between different graphical user interface systems,” which is incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.


User-mode address space 150 includes any number of application modules 154, a public application whitelist 158, an public application whitelist manager 162, a user/group application whitelist 170, and a user/group application whitelist manager 174. User/group application whitelist 170 and public application whitelist 158 are maintained in any data storage medium (not shown) of computer 100. The communication path between application modules 154 and OS kernel module 124 signifies that each application module is capable of passing information (e.g., the path to an application module) to OS kernel module 124 during operation. The communication paths from user/group application whitelist 170 to user/group application whitelist manager 174 and from public application whitelist 158 to public application whitelist manager 162 signify that both whitelists can be read from storage and information therein can be provided to application access manager driver 128 during operation.


When a process (parent process) running on computer 100 attempts to start another process (child process) while executing code in an application module 154, a request is sent to kernel address space 120, and more particularly to OS kernel module 124. For example, on Windows computers, when a user double-clicks a Microsoft Word icon on the desktop, the process running the Windows Desktop executable module (i.e., EXPLORER.EXE) executes a number of functions that eventually send a command to the OS kernel module 124 to start a new process running the Microsoft Word executable module (WINWORD.EXE). In this example, the process running EXPLORER.EXE is the parent process and the new process running WINWORD.EXE is the child process. By way of useful background, Windows Explorer is a Windows GUI shell that lets a user examine hard drives, folders, and files of computer 100.


When application access manager driver 128 receives notification of a request to run an application or process. Application access manager driver 128 processes the request and either allows the process to run or denies the request. That is, as access to a certain application is requested, application access manager driver 128 performs an application filtering function according to the invention. In this way, application access manager driver 128 is used to enforce access restrictions on the applications of computer 100.


Public application whitelist 158 is a resource (e.g., a file or files) for storing a list of applications that may be run by all users/groups 190 on computer 100. Such a resource is referred to in the art as a centralized whitelist. The contents of public application whitelist 158 are set up by an administrator.


Public application whitelist manager 162 starts when computer 100 boots up. Public application whitelist manager 162 is responsible for communicating public application whitelist 158 to application access manager driver 128 to be stored in global data 136 at application access manager driver 128, which can be accessed from any process. Public application whitelist manager 162 reads public application whitelist 158 from storage, adds to the whitelist any applications that an administrator has published to all users/groups 190, and then sends the whitelist to application access manager driver 128. As such, the act of publishing an application automatically grants all users/groups 190 rights to that application. Public application whitelist manager 162 sends public application whitelist 158 to application access manager driver 128 directly via a method that allows user-mode modules to send messages to kernel mode modules (drivers). On Windows computers this may be done using an IO Control.


User/group application whitelist 170 is a resource (e.g., a file or files) for storing a list of programs that are allowed to run on computer 100 by a specific user or group 190. User/group application whitelist 170 may include an association between programs and users or groups. It is further expressly contemplated that user/group application whitelist 170 may instead be a blacklist; that is, a resource storing only those programs that are not allowed to be run by each user or group 190. The contents of user/group application whitelist 170 are set up by an administrator. The administrator may make manual entries to user/group application whitelist 170 and/or automatically enable a user access to programs that an administrator has published to a user or group (e.g., programs that are referenced by shortcuts included in the user's profile.


User/group application whitelist manager 174 may be the program that manages initialization of the user's environment. User/group application whitelist manager 174 loads user/group application whitelist 170 from storage, adds to the whitelist programs that are published to the user (or groups to which the user belongs), and sends user/group application whitelist 170 to application access manager driver 128 to be stored in user data 132. Public application whitelist 158 can be edited by public application whitelist manager 162 or by the logon process at user/group application whitelist manager 174. By contrast, the user/group application whitelist 170 can only be edited by the logon process at user/group application whitelist manager 174. For the purposes of the invention, public application whitelist manager 162 and user/group application whitelist manager 174 may be implemented as separate processes or as a single process.



FIG. 2 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 200 of defining public access to applications and/or programs of computer 100, and more particularly of defining public application whitelist 158. Method 200 may include, but is not limited to, the following steps.


At step 210, an administrator (or other user with similar rights) uses an input device (not shown) of computer 100 to enter information regarding applications and/or programs that are required for users/groups 190 to access computer 100 and run the programs that are published to the user. On Windows computers, an example of one such program is ctfmon.exe, a Windows program that manages keyboard layouts.


At step 220, the administrator uses an input device (not shown) of computer 100 to enter information regarding applications and/or programs that may be invoked by all users/groups 190 of computer 100. That is, in the process of configuring computer 100, the administrator publishes a set of applications to all users/groups 190. For example, an administrator may publish Microsoft Word® by creating a shortcut to Microsoft Word® in the Public\Desktop folder of computer 100. The act of publishing an application to all users/groups 190 automatically grants all users/groups 190 rights to that application, as described in step 450 of method 400 of FIG. 4.


Step 220 provides a benefit over conventional systems in which there is no connection between the process of publishing applications to a user and restricting the user from running applications that are not published. For example, administrators can publish applications to users on Windows computers using Group Policy Preferences and grant/deny users access to applications using Group Policy. With these methods, however, administrators must publish the applications and then separately perform manual steps to grant the user the right to run the published applications and restrict the user from running applications that are not published. In step 220, administrators must only publish the applications; the system then automatically grants the user access to the published applications and denies the user access to all other applications that are not in public application whitelist 158.


At step 230, the administrator saves the set of processes defined at step 210 in the form of public application whitelist 158 to storage medium (not shown) of computer 100. Optionally, the administrator may also save the list of published applications defined at step 220 in public application whitelist 158 to storage medium of computer 100, but in order to avoid data duplication, published applications are typically added to public application whitelist 158 at step 450 of method 400 of FIG. 4. In one example, public application whitelist 158 is stored as an XML file in a default system directory to which all users are granted read access but only administrators are granted write access.



FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 300 of defining user-specific and group-specific access to programs of computer 100, and more particularly of defining user/group application whitelist 170. Method 300 may include, but is not limited to, the following steps.


At step 310, an administrator (or other user with similar rights) uses an input device (not shown) of computer 100 to enter information regarding the programs of computer 100 that specific users or groups are allowed to run. In one example, the administrator generates a user-specific or group-specific whitelist for each user or group 190. In another example, the administrator generates one whitelist in which each program entry includes a list of the users and groups 190 that are allowed to access the program.


At step 320, which may be in addition to or in place of step 310, the administrator publishes applications to specific users or groups 190. For example, on a Windows computer, an administrator may publish Microsoft Word® to a specific group of users using Group Policy Preferences. Like step 220 of method 200 of FIG. 2, the act of publishing the application automatically grants specific users 190 and/or specific groups 190 rights to that application. As such, step 320 provides a benefit over conventional systems in which there is no connection between the process of publishing applications to a user or group and automatically granting the user of group rights to run the applications. This process is managed by user/group application whitelist manager 174 at step 530 of method 500 of FIG. 5. Again, current methods use group policy to enforce process restrictions, in which an administrator must publish the applications and then separately perform manual steps to grant the user rights to certain applications and/or to restrict the user from running applications.


In one example, the administrator specifies an application path and executable name for each allowable program. In another example, a directory can be specified and all programs within the directory (and, if present, subdirectories of the directory) can be considered allowable programs. In yet another example, the administrator can specify that a hash code be generated and used to identify each allowable program. Hash codes may be derived using any conventional or novel hashing process known to one of skill.


At step 330, the administrator saves the allowable processes in the form of user/group application whitelist 170 to storage medium (not shown) of computer 100. In one example, each user/group application whitelist 170 is stored in an XML file in a user-specific or group-specific directory. Further, this file or directory can have read-only access properties for users or groups 190. The properties are enforced by OS 110 and prevent unauthorized modifications of user allowable processes.



FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 400 of initializing public access to programs of computer 100, and more particularly of passing public application whitelist 158 to application access manager driver 128. Method 400 may include, but is not limited to, the following steps.


At step 410, public application whitelist manager 162 is started on computer 100. In one example, public application whitelist manager 162 is started during the startup process of OS 110. Note that startup typically occurs prior to user authentication.


At step 420, public application whitelist manager 162 loads and initializes application access manager driver 128 if application access manager driver 128 is not already running (e.g., if application access manager driver 128 is not configured to load when OS 110 boots).


At step 430, application access manager driver 128 registers a “create process” callback function with OS kernel module 124. This involves passing a reference to a function of application access manager driver 128 to kernel module 124 that meets OS 110's requirements for “create process” callback functions. These requirements may include calling convention and parameter requirements.


At step 440, public application whitelist manager 162 loads public application whitelist 158 from storage medium (not shown) into primary memory (not shown) of computer 100.


At step 450, based on applications that are published in step 220 of method 200 of FIG. 2, public application whitelist manager 162 automatically adds the applications that are published to all users to the contents of public application whitelist 158. For example, on Windows computers, the list of published applications may be obtained by searching directories within the user's user profile for shortcuts to applications.


At step 460, public application whitelist manager 162 transmits the composite public application whitelist 158 to application access manager driver 128. In so doing, the list of public allowable programs crosses over from user-mode address space 150 to kernel-mode address space 120.


At step 470, application access manager driver 128 stores public application whitelist 158 in global data 136 of application access manager driver 128.


The benefits of performing method 400 of FIG. 4 include (1) bringing public application whitelist 158 into kernel space, where it may be accessed with high efficiency during user-specific program access enforcement methods and (2) creating a communication path from OS kernel module 124 to application access manager driver 128 that can be used to enforce the program restrictions defined in public application whitelist 158.



FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 500 of initializing user-specific and group-specific access to programs of computer 100, and more particularly of passing user/group application whitelist 170 to application access manager driver 128. Method 500 may include, but is not limited to, the following steps.


At step 510, a certain user 190 is authenticated with computer 100. This step may include a username and password check or other type of conventional or novel authentication known to one of skill. This step generally assumes that the list of allowable users has been predetermined for computer 100 and is accessible from storage.


At step 520, user/group application whitelist manager 174 reads into memory (not shown) of computer 100 the list of allowable programs contained in user/group application whitelist 170 that are associated with the authenticated user 190 and any groups of which the user belongs. The allowable programs may be read from a file into a data structure that can be quickly searched, such as an array list.


At step 530, based on applications that are published in step 310 of method 300 of FIG. 3, user/group application whitelist manager 174 automatically adds any applications that are published to the authenticated user 190 to the contents of user/group application whitelist 170. This also includes automatically adding applications that are published to any groups of which the authenticated user 190 is a member. For example, on Windows computers, the list of published applications may be obtained by searching directories within the user's user profile for shortcuts to applications.


At step 540, user/group application whitelist manager 174 transmits the composite user/group application whitelist 170, which contains the user-specific list of allowable programs, to application access manager driver 128. Thus, the user/group list of allowable programs exists in kernel-mode address space 120.


At step 550, application access manager driver 128 stores user/group application access whitelist 170 in user data 132 of the authenticated user 190. User data 132 resides at application access manager driver 128.


The benefits of initialization method 500 include bringing user/group application whitelist 170 into kernel-mode address space 120, where it can be accessed with high efficiency during user-specific application access enforcement methods.



FIG. 6 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 600 of enforcing access restrictions to applications and/or programs of computer 100. More particularly, method 600 is an example of a method of controlling user access to applications and/or programs of a computer. Method 600 may include, but is not limited to, the following steps.


At step 610, any process (parent process) executing application modules 154 attempts to launch a program of computer 100 and thereby create a child process. For example, the child process may be executing a word processing program such as Microsoft Word®, which is WINWORD.EXE, and the parent process of Microsoft Word® may be Windows Explorer, which is EXPLORER. EXE.


At step 620, parent process executing a specific application module 154 calls a “create process” function of OS kernel module 124. The “create process” function requests that OS kernel module 124 create a process and execute a specific application module 154.


At step 630, OS kernel module 124 prepares the process for execution. For example, OS kernel module 124 may set up an address space for the process, load the file containing the specific application module 154's code into memory, and/or set up a stack for the process.


At step 640, before starting the process, OS kernel module 124 calls application access manager driver 128's “create process” callback function, which was registered with OS kernel module 124 at step 430 of method 400 of FIG. 4.


At decision step 650, application access manager driver 128 determines whether the invoked program is present in public application whitelist 158. For example, application access manager driver 128 interrogates the contents of public application whitelist 158 for the requested program. If the program is present, method 600 proceeds to step 690. If the program is not present, method 600 proceeds to decision step 660.


At decision step 660, application access manager driver 128 determines whether the invoked program is present in user/group application whitelist 170. For example, application access manager driver 128 interrogates the contents of user/group application whitelist 170 for the requested program. If the program is present, method 600 proceeds to step 690. If the program is not present, method 600 proceeds to step 670.


According to one embodiment, public application whitelist 158 and user/group application whitelist 170 are both stored in kernel space memory. Decision steps 650 and 660 may include iterating through entries in both whitelists and, for each allowable process entry, checking as to whether the application matches the entry. In embodiments in which the list of allowable processes is stored in any one of a plurality of formats (e.g., a file name, a directory name, a hash), checking may include a format-specific step, such as comparing file name strings, iterating through a directory and comparing file name strings found therein, and/or calculating a file hash. The iteration may return a Boolean true if the allowable process is found, otherwise returning false.


At step 670, having determined that the invoked program is not present in any whitelist, application access manager driver 128 returns a failure indication to OS kernel module 124.


At step 680, OS kernel module 124 terminates the invoked program, which may include unloading any executable modules of application modules 154 that were prepared at step 630.


At step 690, having determined that the invoked program is in either the public application whitelist 158 or user/group application whitelist 170, application access manager driver 128 returns a success indication to OS kernel module 124.


At step 695, OS kernel module 124 starts the program, which may include starting an initial thread of the process that was prepared at step 630.

Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling user access to applications, the method comprising: setting up a kernel-mode address space in memory;identifying that a user is authorized to access the requested application when the user is a member of a select group of users by a hardware processor executing instructions out of the kernel-mode address space setup in the memory;receiving a list of required applications that the select group of users are allowed to access from a file, the list of required applications including information that associates one or more users of the select group of users with the required applications, and the file is stored in a user-mode address space;storing the information that associates the one or more users of the select group of users with the required applications in a data structure in the kernel-mode address space accessible by a hardware processor when executing program code of an operating system kernel,publishing the required applications to the select group of users by creating one or more shortcuts that identify the required applications;receiving a request to access an application of the required applications from a computer operated by the user of the select group of users over a network interface;identifying that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application when the requested application is in the list of required applications, wherein the identifying that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application includes the hardware processor executing the program code of the operating system kernel to search the data structure stored in the kernel-mode address space;accessing the requested application according to a shortcut of the one or more shortcuts, wherein the shortcut of the one or more shortcuts identifies a folder where the requested application resides, the requested application is accessed by the hardware processor executing the program code of the operating system kernel to access an application module stored in the user-mode address space, the user-mode address space is accessible to the required applications, and the application module includes program code that is associated with the requested application; andproviding access to data associated with the requested application to the computer operated by the authorized user over the network interface.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving an input from a system administrator identifying a new application to add to the list of required applications that the select group of users are allowed to access;creating a new shortcut that identifies a folder where the new application resides;receiving a request from another user of the select group of users to access the new application from a computer of the another user of the select group of users;identifying that the another user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application; accessing the new application according to the new shortcut; andproviding access to data associated with the new application to the computer of the another user of the select group of users.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the creating of the new shortcut allows all users of the select user group access to the new application.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising denying access to an application that is not in the list of required applications.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the list of required applications is stored in a group specific directory.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving authentication information input by the user of the select group of users from the computer associated with the user of the select group of users before identifying that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application.
  • 7. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having embodied thereon a program executable by a hardware processor to perform a method for controlling user access to applications, the method comprising: setting up a kernel-mode address space in memory;identifying that a user is authorized to access the requested application when the user is a member of a select group of users by a hardware processor executing instructions out of the kernel-mode address space setup in the memory;receiving a list of required applications that the select group of users are allowed to access from a file, the list of required applications including information that associates one or more users of the select group of users with the required applications, and the file is stored in a user-mode address space;storing the information that associates the one or more users of the select group of users with the required applications in a data structure in the kernel-mode address space accessible by the hardware processor when executing program code of an operating system kernel,publishing the required applications to the select group of users by creating one or more shortcuts that identify the required applications;receiving a request to access an application of the required applications from a computer operated by the user of the select group of users over a network interface;identifying that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application when the requested application is in the list of required applications, wherein the identifying that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application includes the hardware processor executing the program code of the operating system kernel to search the data structure stored in the kernel-mode address space;accessing the requested application according to a shortcut of the one or more shortcuts, wherein the shortcut of the one or more shortcuts identifies a folder where the requested application resides, the requested application is accessed by the hardware processor executing the program code of the operating system kernel to access an application module stored in the user-mode address space, the user-mode address space is accessible to the required, and the application module includes program code that is associated with the requested application; andproviding access to data associated with the requested application to the computer operated by the authorized user over the network interface.
  • 8. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, the program further executable to: receive an input from a system administrator identifying a new application to add to the list of required applications that the select group of users are allowed to access;create a new shortcut of the one or more shortcuts that identifies a folder where the new application resides;receive a request from another user of the select group of users to access the new application from a computer of the another user of the select group of users;identify that the another user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application;access the new application according to the new shortcut; andprovide access to data associated with the new application to the computer of the another user of the select group of users.
  • 9. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8, wherein the creating of the new shortcut allows all users of the select user group access to the new application.
  • 10. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, the program further executable to deny access to an application that is not in the list of required applications.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, wherein the list of required applications is stored in a group specific directory.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 7, the program further executable to receive authentication information input by the user of the select group of users from the computer associated with the user of the select group of users before identifying that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application.
  • 13. An apparatus for controlling user access to applications, the apparatus comprising: a user-mode data store that stores a file that includes a list of required applications that a select group of users are allowed to access, the list of required applications including information that associates one or more users of the select group of users with the required applications, and the file is stored in a user-mode address space;a memory;a hardware processor, wherein the hardware processor executing instructions out of the memory: sets up a kernel mode address space in the memory,identifies a user as being authorized to access the requested application when the user is a member of the select group of users by the hardware processor executing instructions out of the kernel mode memory address space setup in the memory,stores the information that associates the one or more users of the select group of users with the required applications in a data structure in the kernel-mode address space accessible by the hardware processor when executing program code of an operating system kernel,publishes the required applications to the select group of users by creating one or more shortcuts that identify the required applications; anda network interface that receives a request to access an application of the required applications from a computer operated by a user of the select group of users, wherein the hardware processor executing instructions out of the memory: identifies that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application when the requested application is in the list of required applications, wherein the identifying that the user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application includes the hardware processor executing the program code of the operating system kernel to search the data structure stored in the kernel-mode address space,accesses the requested application according to a shortcut of the one or more shortcuts, the shortcut of the one or more shortcuts identifies a folder where the requested application resides, wherein the requested application is accessed by the hardware processor executing the program code of the operating system kernel to access an application module stored in the user-mode address space, and the application module includes program code that is associated with the requested application, the user-mode address space is accessible to the required applications, andprovides access to data associated with the requested application to the computer operated by the authorized user, the data provided over the network interface to the computer operated by the user.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising an input device, wherein: the input device receives an input from a system administrator identifying a new application to add to the list of required applications that the select group of users are allowed to access, andthe hardware processor executing instructions out of the memory creates a new shortcut that identifies a folder where the new application resides,the network interface receives a request from another user of the select group of users to access the new application from a computer of the another user of the select group of users, and the hardware processor executing instructions out of the memory: identifies that the another user of the select group of users is authorized to access the requested application,accesses the new application according to the new shortcut, andprovides access to data associated with the new application to another computer operated by the another user of the select group of users, the data associated with the new application is provided over the network interface to the another computer operated by the another user of the select group of users.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the creating of the new shortcut allows all users of the select user group access to the new application.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein access to an application that is not in the list of required applications is denied.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the list of required applications is stored in a group specific directory.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/367,228 filed Feb. 6, 2012, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/439,765 filed Feb. 4, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (206)
Number Name Date Kind
5268962 Abadi Dec 1993 A
5809230 Pereira Sep 1998 A
5831609 London et al. Nov 1998 A
5898419 Liu Apr 1999 A
5978834 Simonoff et al. Nov 1999 A
6288702 Tachibana Sep 2001 B1
6393569 Orenshteyn May 2002 B1
6710790 Fagioli Mar 2004 B1
7051288 Bennett et al. May 2006 B2
7058461 Malizia Jun 2006 B2
7188181 Squier et al. Mar 2007 B1
7216298 Ballard et al. May 2007 B1
7222158 Wexelblat May 2007 B2
7249175 Donaldson Jul 2007 B1
7353252 Yang et al. Apr 2008 B1
7461134 Ambrose Dec 2008 B2
7526792 Ross Apr 2009 B2
7587459 Wewalaarachchi et al. Sep 2009 B2
7647411 Schiavone et al. Jan 2010 B1
7716302 Maze et al. May 2010 B2
7739693 Bernhard et al. Jun 2010 B2
7920528 Karaoguz et al. Apr 2011 B2
8073855 Nagoya Dec 2011 B2
8117554 Grechishkin et al. Feb 2012 B1
8219807 Danoyan et al. Jul 2012 B1
8281410 Sobel et al. Oct 2012 B1
8427445 Kennedy Apr 2013 B2
8438473 Mak et al. May 2013 B2
8527978 Sallam Sep 2013 B1
8688734 Tidd Apr 2014 B1
8694507 Meyerzon et al. Apr 2014 B2
8713658 Tidd Apr 2014 B1
8738814 Cronin May 2014 B1
8739074 Kinoshita May 2014 B2
8745505 Tam Jun 2014 B2
8769011 Baird et al. Jul 2014 B2
8799777 Lee Aug 2014 B1
8856907 Tidd Oct 2014 B1
8863232 Tidd Oct 2014 B1
8887132 Hunter Nov 2014 B1
8950007 Teal et al. Feb 2015 B1
8954887 Tseng Feb 2015 B1
9165160 Tidd Oct 2015 B1
9203791 Olomskiy Dec 2015 B1
9239812 Berlin Jan 2016 B1
9398001 Tidd Jul 2016 B1
9401909 Tidd Jul 2016 B2
20010023438 Ishida Sep 2001 A1
20020091697 Huang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020130900 Davis Sep 2002 A1
20020158921 Silverstein Oct 2002 A1
20030058277 Bowman-Amuah Mar 2003 A1
20030084112 Curray et al. May 2003 A1
20030163448 Kilemba et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040080771 Mihira et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040163046 Chu et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040190049 Itoh Sep 2004 A1
20050044483 Maze et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050093868 Hinckley May 2005 A1
20050102636 McKeon et al. May 2005 A1
20050114760 Arregui et al. May 2005 A1
20050138569 Baxter et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149857 Negishi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050177730 Davenport et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198299 Beck et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210418 Marvit et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050226192 Red et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060005187 Neil Jan 2006 A1
20060010433 Neil Jan 2006 A1
20060039012 Ferlitsch Feb 2006 A1
20060047780 Patnude Mar 2006 A1
20060059253 Goodman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075224 Tao Apr 2006 A1
20060150256 Fanton et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161846 Van Leeuwen Jul 2006 A1
20060230105 Shappir et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250578 Pohl et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253558 Acree et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070061264 Yeung et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078994 Wilson et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070089111 Robinson et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070101297 Forstall et al. May 2007 A1
20070113187 McMullen et al. May 2007 A1
20070121584 Qiu et al. May 2007 A1
20070174410 Croft et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070198950 Dodge Aug 2007 A1
20070280459 Yee et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070283446 Yami et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080016504 Cheng et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080071860 Dal Canto et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080091550 Zacarias et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080137131 Cavill et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080167005 Gilzean et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080209537 Wong et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080270516 Ragnet et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090013045 Maes et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090013273 Fuchs Jan 2009 A1
20090021387 Hosono Jan 2009 A1
20090024626 Takei Jan 2009 A1
20090027334 Foulk et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090037976 Teo et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070404 Mazzaferri Mar 2009 A1
20090083852 Kuo et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090132509 Nagoya May 2009 A1
20090144362 Richmond et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177791 Edelstein et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090180777 Bernard et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182501 Fyke Jul 2009 A1
20090187654 Raja et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187857 Tanaka Jul 2009 A1
20090204711 Binyamin Aug 2009 A1
20090231285 Duncan Sep 2009 A1
20090235347 Syed et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245176 Balasubramanian et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090300129 Golub Dec 2009 A1
20100005142 Xiao et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100020025 Lemort et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100058431 McCorkendale et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100088367 Brown et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100138780 Marano et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100146504 Tang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100153581 Nagarajan et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100162163 Wang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100214302 Melcher et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100228963 Kassab et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100268762 Pahlavan et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100269039 Pahlavan et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100269152 Pahlavan et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100293499 Young et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100295817 Nicholson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100321406 Iwase Dec 2010 A1
20100325716 Hong et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110010668 Feldstein Jan 2011 A1
20110029772 Fanton et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110099297 Hayton Apr 2011 A1
20110113427 Dotan May 2011 A1
20110137974 Momchilov Jun 2011 A1
20110138295 Momchilov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110138314 Mir et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110141031 McCullough et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145728 Bishop Jun 2011 A1
20110154212 Gharpure et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110191407 Fu et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110197051 Mullin et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110209064 Jorgensen et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110258271 Gaquin Oct 2011 A1
20110264463 Kincaid Oct 2011 A1
20110270936 Guthrie et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277027 Hayton et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110279829 Chang et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110302495 Pinto et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110307614 Bernardi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110314093 Sheu et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120011472 Ohkubo Jan 2012 A1
20120011578 Hinton et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120023593 Puder et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120030584 Bian Feb 2012 A1
20120054671 Thompson et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066607 Song et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066695 Berezansky et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120066762 Todorovic Mar 2012 A1
20120084713 Desai et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120092277 Momchilov Apr 2012 A1
20120096389 Flam et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120151374 Liu Jun 2012 A1
20120159482 Jeong et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159570 Reierson et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173673 Dietrich et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120173732 Sullivan Jul 2012 A1
20120185527 Jaudon et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185767 Schlegel Jul 2012 A1
20120226742 Momchilov et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120240054 Webber Sep 2012 A1
20120246645 Iikura et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120297471 Smithson Nov 2012 A1
20120304061 Hoover Nov 2012 A1
20120304168 Raj Seeniraj et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120311070 BianRosa et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120324365 Momchilov et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130024779 Bechtel et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024812 Reeves et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130060842 Grossman et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130097550 Grossman et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130110828 Meyerzon et al. May 2013 A1
20130132856 Binyamin et al. May 2013 A1
20130138810 Binyamin et al. May 2013 A1
20130198600 Lockhart et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130219338 VanBlon Aug 2013 A1
20130254675 de Andrade et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130254761 Reddy et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130275973 Greenfield et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130290856 Beveridge et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130305344 Alicherry et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130311990 Tang et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130318582 McCann et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130326583 Freihold et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140012574 Pasupalak et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140026057 Kimpton et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032644 Saxena et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140074881 Meyerzon et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140143846 Tidd May 2014 A1
20140143847 Tidd May 2014 A1
20140165176 Ow Jun 2014 A1
20140188977 Song et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140325054 Agrawal et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150074199 Lv Mar 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
WO 2010135127 Nov 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (69)
Entry
Park et al.; “Role-based access control on the web”; ACM transactions on information and system security; vol. 4, No. 1, Feb. 2001. p. 37-71, 35 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,228 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,228 Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,239 Final Office Action mailed Nov. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,239 Office Action mailed Jun. 24, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,742 Final Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,742 Office Action mailed May 9, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,746 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,746 Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,751 Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,752 Final Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,752 Office Action mailed May 9, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,474 Office Action mailed Jun. 11, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,474 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 6, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,474 Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,106 Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,108 Office Action mailed May 13, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,115 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 30, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,115 Office Action mailed Feb. 11, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,743 Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,751 Final Office Action mailed Sep. 3, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,474 Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,106 Final Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,108 Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,097 Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,100 Office Action mailed Sep. 10, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,475 Office Action mailed Apr. 24, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,476 Office Action mailed Apr. 22, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,103 Office Action mailed Apr. 24, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,115 Office Action mailed Jun. 19, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,097 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,100 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,745 Office Action mailed Feb. 10, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,474 Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,108 Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,110 Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,111 Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,113 Office Action mailed Apr. 3, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,746 Office Action mailed Sep. 15, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,751 Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,477 Office Action mailed Jul. 29, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,478 Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,479 Office Action mailed Aug. 12, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,105 Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/150,680 Office Action mailed Mar. 29, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/150,684 Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/151,222 Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,306 Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,475 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 3, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,476 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 2, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,478 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 29, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/753,479 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,097 Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,100 Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2016.
Damien, “How to Switch to Desktop Mode for Your Browser in Honeycomb Tablet [Android].” Oct. 4, 2011, http://www.maketecheasier.com/switch-to-desktop-mode-for-honeycomb-tablet-android/.
Kessler, How to use Safari's new ‘Reader’, Jun. 9, 2010, http://www.cnet.com/news/how-to-use-safaris-new-reader/.
Mobotap, “Add-on Digest: Desktop Toggle,” May 16, 2012, http://dolphin.com/add-on-digest-desktop-toggle/.
Sieber, “5 Must Have Add-Ons for the Dolphin Browser on Your Android Honeycomb Tablet,” Oct. 25, 2011, http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/5-addons-dolphin-browser-android-honeycomb-tablet/.
Xue, “Windows 8 How To: 1. Switch Between Metro UI and Desktop Mode,” Mar. 7, 2012, http://blogs.msdn.com/b/zxue/archive/2012/03/07win8-howto-1-switch-between-metro-ui-and-desktop.aspx.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,303 Office Action mailed Nov. 13, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,745 Final Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/445,319 Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,103 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 31, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,110 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,111 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,113 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,743 Office Action mailed Oct. 23, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,108 Final Office Action mailed Oct. 29, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,115 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2016.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61439765 Feb 2011 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13367228 Feb 2012 US
Child 14332660 US