Aspects of the invention are directed to a system for boiler control.
Today's state-of-the-art boiler controllers are designed and tuned to run at or above a given quantity of exhaust gas O2. This is done for reasons of safety (carbon monoxide, flame stability), emission regulations and operational robustness but results in an efficiency penalty. Since CO is not measured, conservative margins are built into boiler systems in order to avoid violation of operational constraints. These conservative margins further erode efficiency.
A system for boiler control is provided. The system includes supply units to provide supplies of combustion materials for combustion thereof, a vessel coupled to the supply units in which the combustion materials are combusted, a carbon monoxide (CO) sensor disposed at an outlet of the vessel to sense a quantity of exhaust CO output from the vessel as a product of combustion therein and a control unit. The control unit is coupled to the supply units and the sensor and configured to issue a main servo command and a pulse servo command to one or more of the supply units to control operations of the one or more supply units in accordance with the sensed quantity of the exhaust CO.
Issuance of the main servo command provides baseline amounts of the combustion materials for combustion for baseline amounts of time. Issuance of the pulse servo command increases the amount of the combustion materials provided for combustion beyond the baseline amounts for short times that are shorter than the baseline amounts of time.
A method of boiler control is provided. The method includes issuing a main servo command to one or more supply units coupled to a vessel for providing baseline amounts of the combustion materials to the vessel for combustion thereof within the vessel for baseline amounts of time and issuing a pulse servo command to the one or more supply units to increase the amount of the combustion materials provided for combustion thereof beyond the baseline amounts for short times that are shorter than the baseline amounts of time. The method further includes sensing a quantity of carbon monoxide (CO) produced by combustion within the vessel and controlling the issuing of the main and pulse servo commands in accordance with at least the sensed quantity of the CO.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
With reference to
Typically, fuel flow in a boiler is scheduled (statically) based on a ‘firing rate’ (a controller internal variable that another controller dynamically computes, based, e.g., on water temperature or steam pressure). In some systems, air flow is also scheduled based on the firing rate, while in other systems air flow is controlled to a firing rate dependant setpoint. For CO based control, this setpoint can be dynamically adjusted based on measurements of the sensed quantity of the exhaust CO. The pulse servo command 502 (or a ‘MicroPulse’) enables CO based control while limiting large CO excursions.
All boilers run ‘lean’ (as opposed to stoichiometric like in a typical gasoline driven internal combustion engine) meaning there is always a surplus of air being flown into the boiler. An air-fuel ratio of 1.1 means that 10% more air than is stoichiometrically necessary is present. An objective of the pulse servo command 502 (i.e., the ‘MicroPulse’) is to temporarily lean-out the mixture to, for example, a ratio of 1.07. This can be achieved in various manners including, but not limited to, adding more fuel or flowing less air. These operations are functionally nearly equivalent and interchangeable and the choice between them depends on engineering considerations (e.g. actuator speed).
In accordance with embodiments, the vessel 30 may be a combustor of, for example, a gas turbine engine. In this and other similar cases, the first supply unit 20 provides a supply of air for combustion thereof to the interior 31 of the vessel 30 and the second supply unit 21 provides a supply of fuel for combustion thereof to the interior 31 of the vessel 30. The vessel 30 further includes a mixing 301 section in which the combustion materials (i.e., the air and fuel) are mixed and a combustion section 302. The combustion section 302 is disposed downstream from the mixing section 301 and is formed to define the interior 31 where combustion of the combustion materials occurs. The combustion section 302 is further formed to define the outlet 32 where the sensor 40 is disposed.
With reference to
The pulse servo command 502 includes one or both of a first additional command 5020 to be issued to the first supply unit 20 and a second additional command 5021 to be issued to the second supply unit 21. The first additional command 5020 instructs the first supply unit 20 to decrease the amount of air provided to the interior 31 of the vessel 30 for combustion thereof beyond the baseline amount of the air for a short time that is shorter than the baseline amount of time. The second additional command 5021 instructs the second supply unit 21 to increase the amount of fuel provided to the interior 31 of the vessel 30 for combustion thereof beyond the baseline amount of the fuel for a short time that is shorter than the baseline amount of time.
As shown in
In particular, from time t0 to time tn, the control unit 50 issues the main servo command 501 to one or more of the first and second supply units 20, 21. The main servo command 501 instructs the one or more of the first and second supply units 20, 21 to steadily decrease/increase the corresponding supply(ies) of the air and/or fuel to interior 31 of the vessel 30. From time t0 to time tx, the control unit 50 issues the pulse servo command 502 on top of the main servo command 501 as an instruction to decrease/increase the corresponding supply(ies) of the air and/or fuel for time t0 to time tx. At time tx, the pulse servo command 502 ceases and the main servo command 501 continues to be issued and steadily decreased/increased by the control unit 50. The period from time tx to time ty is set to be sufficiently long relative to transport delays in the vessel 30 such that CO produced by the combustion therein can be sensed by the sensor 40 whereby the sensor 40 is able to determine whether the critical air and fuel ratio at which the quantity of exhaust CO starts to rise sharply has been or is soon to be reached without the apparatus 10 spending a significant amount of time in that air and fuel ratio range. If the sensor 40 determines that the critical air and fuel ratio has not been and will not soon be reached, the process continues with the control unit 50 again issuing the pulse servo command 502 on top of the main servo command from time ty to time tz. At time tz, the pulse servo command 502 ceases and the main servo command 501 continues to be issued and steadily increased by the control unit 50 until the sensor 40 determines that the critical air and fuel ratio has been or will soon be increased. Once that occurs, the pulse servo command 502 is no longer issued and the main servo command 501 is no longer increased at a significant rate by the control unit 50.
With the control unit 50 coupled to the first and second supply units 20, 21 and the sensor 40, the control unit 50 is able to vary both the main servo command 501 and the pulse servo command 502 over time in accordance with at least the sensed quantity of the exhaust CO (and possibly other sensed properties, such as O2). That is, while the main servo command 501 can be steadily increased over time as described above, the pulse servo command 502 may be constant relative to the main servo command over time or decreased relative to the main servo command 501 over time. That is, a magnitude of 502a may be substantially similar to or different from a magnitude of 502b. For the latter case where 502a and 502b are different, the probing of the critical air and fuel ratio by the issuance of the pulse servo command 502 can therefore be achieved to an increasingly limited degree with an associated increased limitation of CO emissions. The degree to which the pulse servo command 502 is decreased relative to the main servo command 501 over time can be based on sensor 40 readings and/or historical CO emissions data for the apparatus 10.
As mentioned above, the control unit 50 is able to cease issuance of the pulse servo command 502 in accordance with the sensed quantity of the exhaust CO. Still further, the control unit 50 may cease issuance of the pulse servo command 502 when the sensed quantity of the exhaust CO indicates that the main servo command 501 has been reached, will soon be reached or substantially approximates the critical air and fuel ratio (or an acceptable range thereof). The pulse servo command 502 may later resume as soon as the sensed quantity of the exhaust CO indicates a sufficiently large margin from the critical region.
With reference to
While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
This invention was made with government support under W912HQ-10-C-0073 awarded by the U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Command. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/037536 | 5/23/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/22/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/161687 | 11/29/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4362269 | Rastogi | Dec 1982 | A |
20020101212 | Okai | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20070099137 | Donnelly et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111148 | Wells | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119349 | Widmer | May 2007 | A1 |
20090223466 | Knorr, Jr. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1855053 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2008241092 | Oct 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2011/037536 dated Dec. 5, 2013, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 11866244.4; Mar. 4, 2015; 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140114483 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |