© 2005-2006 MusicStrands, Inc. A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. 37 CFR §1.71(d).
This invention relates generally to systems for assisting users to navigate media item catalogs with the ultimate goal of building mediasets and/or discover media items. More specifically, the present invention pertains to computer software methods and products to enable users to interactively browse through an electronic catalog by leveraging media item association metrics.
New technologies combining digital media item players with dedicated software, together with new media distribution channels through networks are quickly changing the way people organize and play media items. As a direct consequence of such evolution in the media industry, users are faced with a huge volume of available choices that clearly overwhelm them when choosing what item to play in a certain moment.
This overwhelming effect can be easily detected in the music arena, where people are faced with the problem of selecting music from very large collections of songs. However, in the future, we might detect similar effects in other domains like music videos, movies, news, etc.
In general, our invention is applicable to any kind of media item that can be grouped by users forming mediasets. For example, in the music domain, these mediasets could be playlists. Users put music together in playlists to overcome the problem of being overwhelmed when choosing a song from a large collection, or just to enjoy a set of songs in particular situations. For example, one might be interested in having a playlist for running, another for cooking, etc.
This invention addresses the problem of helping users navigate through a media item catalog based on a small set of selected media items. This set of selected media items can be seen as an initial set to build a starting point for the navigation experience.
Different approaches can be considered when building systems to help users navigate a media item catalog. The most commonly used is the keyword based search where the user specifies a set of keywords and the system retrieves the set of media items which contain the keywords in their descriptors. Another approach is to consider a search based on metadata. For example in the music arena, a user might be asking to retrieve rock songs from the 90s.
However, many times users do not know what they are looking for. They want to explore the catalog and find interesting items. This observation is especially relevant for media item catalogs with a clear entertainment focus.
Various approaches can be adopted to personalized recommendations. One kind of approach is about using human expertise to classify the media items and then use these classifications to infer recommendations to users based on an input mediaset. For instance, if in the input mediaset the item x appears and x belongs to the same classification as y, then a system could recommend item y based on the fact that both items are classified in a similar cluster. However, this approach requires an incredibly huge amount of human work and expertise. Another approach is to analyze the data of the items (audio signal for songs, video signal for video, etc) and then try to match users preferences with the extracted analysis. This class of approaches is yet to be shown effective from a technical point of view.
Hosken (U.S. Pat. No. 6,438,579) describes a system and method for recommending media items responsive to query media items based on the explicit and implicit user characterizations of the content of the media items. Dunning, et. al. (U.S. Patent Application Pubs 2002/0082901 and 2003/0229537) disclose a system and method for discovering relationships between media items based on explicit and implicit user associations between said items. The need remains for improved methods and systems to assist users in navigating through media item catalogs with the ultimate goal of helping them build mediasets and/or discover media items that they will enjoy.
In one embodiment the invention comprises a system, preferably implemented in computer software, for guiding users along an interactive, personalized path through a media item catalog beginning from an initial selection by the user of one or more media items. As explained below, “media items” as used herein includes, by way of example and not limitation, music tracks or songs, albums, movies, music videos, other video “clips,” news articles, other media, including text, graphics, multi-media presentations, etc. Preferably, the media items themselves, i.e. the actual content, is not part of the present system. Rather, each media item is identified by meta data.
The system requires a knowledge base consisting of a collection of mediasets. Mediasets are sets of media items that are naturally grouped by users. The mediasets of the knowledge base define metrics among items. Such metrics indicate how correlated media items are in the mediasets of the knowledge base. For each media item of the initial set, the system generates one list of media items for each metric of the system. The media items of these lists are the ones with highest metrics with respect to the associated media item. The user can then select any of the media items of the proposed lists, and the selected list becomes part of the initial set of media items, resulting in newly generated lists being proposed to the user. The process is interactive. Advantages of such interactivity include easier and more effective browsing through the catalog and/or building a new appropriate mediaset.
Additional aspects and advantages will be apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Reference is now made to the figures in which like reference numerals refer to like elements. For clarity, the first digit of a reference numeral indicates the figure number in which the corresponding element is first used.
In the following description, certain specific details of programming, software modules, user selections, network transactions, database queries, database structures, etc. are omitted to avoid obscuring the invention. Those of ordinary skill in computer sciences will comprehend many ways to implement the invention in various embodiments, the details of which can be determined using known technologies.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In general, the methodologies of the present invention are advantageously carried out using one or more digital processors, for example the types of microprocessors that are commonly found in servers, PC's, laptops, PDA's and all manner of desktop or portable electronic appliances.
The system comprises a knowledge base which is a collection of mediasets. A mediaset is a list of media items that a user has grouped together. A media item can be of different nature, e.g. a song, a book, a newspaper, a movie, a piece of a radio program, etc. If a mediaset is composed of the same type of media items it is called a homogeneous mediaset, otherwise it is called a heterogeneous mediaset. A mediaset can be ordered or unordered. An ordered mediaset implies a certain order with respect to the sequence in which the items are used1 by the user. 1 Depending on the nature of the item, it will be played, viewed, read, etc.
In general, mediasets are based on the assumption that users group media items together following some logic or reasoning. For example, in the music domain, a user may be selecting a set of songs for driving, hence that is a homogeneous mediaset of songs. In this invention, we also consider other kinds of media items such as books, movies, newspapers, and so on. For example, if we consider books, a user may have a list of books for the summer, a list of books for work, and another list of books for the weekends. A user may be interested in expressing a heterogeneous mediaset with a mix of books and music, expressing the music that goes well with certain books.
A set of media items is not considered the same as a mediaset. The difference is mainly about the intention of the user in grouping the items together. In the case of a mediaset the user is expressing that the items in the mediaset go well, in some sense, with his personal preferences. On the other hand, a set of media items does not express necessarily the preferences of a user. We use the term set of media items to refer to the input of the system of the invention as well as to the output of the system.
A metric M between a pair of media items i and l for a given knowledge base k expresses some degree of relation between i and j with respect to k. A metric may be expressed as a distance, where smaller distance values represent stronger association values, or as a similarity, where larger similarity values represent stronger association values. The most immediate metric is the co-concurrency (i, j) that indicates how many times item i and item j appear together in any of the mediasets of k. The metric pre-concurrency (i, j) indicates how many times item i and item j appear together but i before j in any of the mediasets of k. The metric post-concurrency (i, j) indicates how many times item i and item j appear together but i after j in any of the mediasets of k. The previous defined metrics can also be considered considering immediate sequence of i and j. So, the system might be considering co/pre/post-concurrencies metrics but only if items i and j are consecutive in the mediasets (only available if the mediasets are ordered). Other metrics can be considered and also new ones can be defined by combining the previous ones.
A metric may be computed based on any of the above metrics and applying transitivity. For instance, consider co-concurrency between item i and j, co(i,j), and between j and k, co(j,k), and consider that co(i,k)=0. We could create another metric to include transitivity, for example d(i,k)=1/co(i,j)+1/co(j,k). These type of transitivity metrics may be efficiently computed using standard branch and bound search algorithms.
A matrix representation of metric M, (
A graph representation for a given knowledge base k, (
As a preliminary matter, in a presently preferred embodiment, a pre-processing step is carried out to analyze the contents of an existing knowledge base. This can be done in advance of receiving any input items. As noted above, the knowledge base comprises an existing collection of mediasets. This is illustrated in
The present invention requires a knowledge base of mediasets, or at least access to metrics derived from a knowledge base. A knowledge base can be analyzed based on any selected metric. In general, for present purposes, such metrics reflect and indeed quantify some association between pairs of media items in a given knowledge base. The analysis process is described by way of example using the co-concurrency metric mentioned earlier. A similar process can be used for other metrics. Referring still to
Next, for each pair of media items, a co-concurrency metric is incremented for each additional occurrence of the same pair of items in the same knowledge base. For example, if a pair of media items, say the song “Uptown Girl” by Billy Joel and “Hallelujah” by Jeff Buckley, appear together in 42 different mediasets in the knowledge base (not necessarily adjacent one another), then the co-concurrency metric might be 42 (or some other figure depending on the scaling selected, normalization, etc. In some embodiments, this figure or co-concurrency “weight” may be normalized to a number between zero and one.)
Referring now to
Referring now to
The system displays or otherwise communicates the generated lists to the user, and from these the user can select any item. Referring now to
Continuing with reference to
In this way, the user is interactively guided through the catalog as he or she continues to add new items. The user may edit the navigation set at any moment by deleting items from, or adding items to, the generated lists. Every time the users interacts with the navigation set, its associated lists are updated as the system reacts to each edit of the navigation set. The previously described process has various advantageous uses, including assisting users to (a) navigate through a media item catalog, or (b) create new mediasets in a convenient way. A new mediaset can be saved by storing the current input set, or any navigation list, at any time during the interaction.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
For example, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that, while the above system and methods were described as embodied in a media item catalog system, it should be understood that the inventive system could be used in any system that implements a catalog for items that can be grouped by users following some selected criteria. Although specific terms are employed herein, there are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
It will further be apparent to those having skill in the art that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the invention. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/106,752, filed on May 12, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/984,259, filed on Jan. 4, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,945,568, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/858,229, filed on Aug. 17, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/349,370, filed on Feb. 6, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,797,321, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/649,945 filed Feb. 4, 2005, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4996642 | Hey | Feb 1991 | A |
5355302 | Martin | Oct 1994 | A |
5375235 | Berry | Dec 1994 | A |
5464946 | Lewis | Nov 1995 | A |
5483278 | Strubbe | Jan 1996 | A |
5583763 | Atcheson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613097 | Bates et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5749081 | Whiteis | May 1998 | A |
5752031 | Cutler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754939 | Herz | May 1998 | A |
5758257 | Herz | May 1998 | A |
5765144 | Larche | Jun 1998 | A |
5848421 | Brichta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5890152 | Rapaport | Mar 1999 | A |
5918014 | Robinson | Jun 1999 | A |
5950176 | Keiser | Sep 1999 | A |
5963746 | Barker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6000044 | Chrysos | Dec 1999 | A |
6041311 | Chislenko et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047311 | Ueno | Apr 2000 | A |
6072481 | Matsushita et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076091 | Fohn et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6112186 | Bergh | Aug 2000 | A |
6134532 | Lazarus | Oct 2000 | A |
6266649 | Linden et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345288 | Reed | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346951 | Mastronardi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347313 | Ma | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349339 | Williams | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6381575 | Martin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6430539 | Lazarus | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434621 | Pezzillo | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438579 | Hosken | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6480855 | Siefert | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487539 | Aggarwal | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526411 | Ward | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532469 | Feldman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6577716 | Minter | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578030 | Wilmsen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587127 | Leeke | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615208 | Behrens | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6647371 | Shinohara | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6687696 | Hofmann et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690918 | Evans | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704576 | Brachman | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6727914 | Gutta | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728729 | Jawa et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748395 | Picker | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751574 | Shinohara | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763345 | Hempleman et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766363 | Rothschild | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785688 | Abajjan | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6842761 | Diamond | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6914891 | Ha | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931454 | Deshpande | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933433 | Porteus | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938209 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941324 | Plastina | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947922 | Glance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950804 | Strietzel | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6987221 | Platt | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990497 | O'Rourke | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993532 | Platt | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7013238 | Weare | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020637 | Bratton | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021836 | Anderson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043479 | Ireton | May 2006 | B2 |
7051352 | Schaffer | May 2006 | B1 |
7072846 | Robinson | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7082407 | Bezos | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7096234 | Plastina | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111240 | Crow | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113917 | Jacobi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113999 | Pestoni | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120619 | Drucker | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127143 | Elkins | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136866 | Springer, Jr. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139723 | Conkwright | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7159174 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174126 | McElhatten | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180473 | Horie | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194421 | Conkwright | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196258 | Platt | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197472 | Conkwright | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200627 | Stickler | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224282 | Terauchi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236941 | Conkwright | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246041 | Fukuda | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246104 | Stickler | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256341 | Plastina | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277870 | Mourad et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302419 | Conkwright | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302468 | Wijeratne | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7358434 | Plastina | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363314 | Picker | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7392212 | Hancock | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7403769 | Kopra | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415181 | Greenwood | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7434247 | Dudkiewicz | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7457852 | O'Rourke et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457862 | Hepworth | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478323 | Dowdy | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487107 | Blanchard et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490775 | Biderman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493572 | Card et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499630 | Koch | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505959 | Kaiser | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7546254 | Bednarek | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568213 | Carhart | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571121 | Bezos | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7571183 | Renshaw et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574422 | Guan | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574434 | Galuten | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574513 | Dunning | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580932 | Plastina | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7599847 | Block | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7599906 | Kashiwagi | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7599950 | Walther | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7644077 | Picker | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647613 | Drakoulis | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650570 | Torrens et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657224 | Goldberg | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657493 | Meijer | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680849 | Heller | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680959 | Svendsen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685204 | Rogers | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693887 | McLaughlin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707603 | Abanami | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712113 | Yoon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720871 | Rogers et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725494 | Rogers et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734569 | Martin | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743009 | Hangartner | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7797321 | Martin | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7826444 | Irvin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831199 | Ng | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840570 | Cervera et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844498 | Robbin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853712 | Amidon et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7875788 | Benyamin | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7889724 | Irvin | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20010007099 | Rau | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010021914 | Jacobi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010056434 | Kaplan | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002899 | Gjerdingen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020042912 | Iilima | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059094 | Hosea | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082901 | Dunning et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129002 | Alberts et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138481 | Aggarwal et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147628 | Specter et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152117 | Cristofalo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178223 | Bushkin | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178276 | McCartney | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194215 | Cantrell | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030022953 | Zampini et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033321 | Schrempp | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051095 | Artigalas et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055516 | Gang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055689 | Block | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030097379 | Ireton | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120630 | Tunkelang | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130991 | Reijerse et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163211 | Van Der Meulen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182254 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182270 | Kuno et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182315 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030204620 | Cheng | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212710 | Guy | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220894 | Russon | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229537 | Dunning et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002993 | Toussaint | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003392 | Trajkovic | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040068552 | Kotz | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070538 | Horie et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073924 | Pendakur | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040122656 | Abir | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128286 | Yasushita | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139064 | Chevallier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148424 | Berkson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158860 | Crow | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162738 | Sanders | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167895 | Carro | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040194128 | McIntyre | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210600 | Chand | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215657 | Drucker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040255340 | Logan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263337 | Terauchi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267715 | Polson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005246 | Card et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021470 | Martin | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027687 | Nowitz et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050079 | Plastina et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060350 | Baum | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075908 | Stevens | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091146 | Levinson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102610 | Jie | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114357 | Chengalvarayan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131752 | Gracie | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141709 | Bratton | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154608 | Paulson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160458 | Baumgartner | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193014 | Prince | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193054 | Wilson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195696 | Rekimoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198075 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203807 | Bezos | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210009 | Tran | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210101 | Janik | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216855 | Kopra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216859 | Paek | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222989 | Haveliwala | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223039 | Kim | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234891 | Walther | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235811 | Dukane | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251440 | Bednarek | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256867 | Walther | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050276570 | Reed | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015571 | Fukuda | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015904 | Marcus | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018208 | Nathan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018209 | Drakoulis et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020062 | Bloom | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020662 | Robinson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026263 | Raghaven | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060032363 | Platt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053077 | Mourad | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062094 | Nathan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067296 | Bershad | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074750 | Clark | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080251 | Fried | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080356 | Burges et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060091203 | Bakker | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095516 | Wijeratne | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100978 | Heller | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112098 | Renshaw et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123052 | Robbin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136344 | Jones | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143236 | Wu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165571 | Seon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168616 | Candelore | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173910 | McLaughlin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173916 | Verbeck Sibley et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174008 | Abanami | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179414 | Martin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184558 | Martin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195438 | Galuten | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195462 | Rogers | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195512 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195513 | Rogers | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195514 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195515 | Beaupre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195516 | Beaupre | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195521 | New | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195789 | Rogers | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195790 | Beaupre | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206478 | Glaser | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206811 | Dowdy | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212494 | Ito | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224259 | Buil et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253874 | Stark et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259889 | Crosetto | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265421 | Ranasinghe et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277098 | Chung | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282304 | Bedard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282311 | Jiang | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288044 | Kashiwagi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288367 | Swix et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016507 | Tzara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043829 | Dua | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061487 | Moore et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073596 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100690 | Hopkins | May 2007 | A1 |
20070101373 | Bodlanender et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118546 | Acharya | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136264 | Tran | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156677 | Szabo | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156732 | Surendran et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161402 | Ng | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162546 | McLaughlin | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203790 | Torrens | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214133 | Liberty et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244880 | Martin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250402 | Blanchard et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250429 | Walser | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250761 | Bradley | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265979 | Hangartner | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271286 | Purang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271287 | Acharya et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288310 | Boos | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294096 | Randall | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004948 | Flake | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080004990 | Flake | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021851 | Alcalde | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027881 | Bisse | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033897 | Lloyd | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040326 | Chang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046317 | Christianson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065471 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065659 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071136 | Oohashi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077264 | Irvin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082467 | Meijer | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109378 | Papadimitriou | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120339 | Guan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127121 | Fenton et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133601 | Cerera | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154942 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155057 | Khedouri | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155588 | Roberts | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080195438 | Manfredi | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215173 | Hicken | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220855 | Chen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256106 | Whitman | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270221 | Clemens | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090006353 | Vignoli | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024504 | Lerman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024510 | Chen | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048957 | Celano | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070267 | Hangartner | Mar 2009 | A9 |
20090073174 | Berg | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076939 | Berg | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076974 | Berg | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083307 | Cervera | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089222 | Ferreira De Castro et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106085 | Raimbeault | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090164641 | Rogers | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210415 | Martin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090276368 | Martin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100161595 | Martin | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169328 | Hangartner | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110119127 | Hangartner | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 050 833 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 231 788 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1420388 | May 2004 | EP |
1 548 741 | Jun 2005 | EP |
11-052965 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2002-108351 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-320203 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-255958 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-221999 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005-027337 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2002-025579 | Apr 2002 | KR |
WO 03036541 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03051051 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO2004070538 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2005013114 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005115107 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006052837 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006075032 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2006114451 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007038806 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007134193 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007075622 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007092053 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2009149046 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Canada—Examiner's Report for App. No. 2713507 mailed on Sep. 21, 2011. |
Extended European Search Report in EP 06 82 5435 dated Nov. 2, 2009. |
UK Search Examination Report, App. No. GB1014954.0, mailed Dec. 16, 2010. |
“Communication from the Examining Division dated Jul. 22, 2011”, European Patent Application No. 09169573.4 (8 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Jan. 1, 2012”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,728 (15 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,768 (10 pages). |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2012”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,758. |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2012”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,916 (13 pages). |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2012”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/242,735 (12 pages). |
“PCT International Search Report dated Jan. 12, 2006”, PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/000213, Jan. 12, 2006. |
NA, , Australia Examiner's 1st Report on patent application No. 2010212503 mailed Jun. 27, 2011. |
NA, , EP Search, App. No. EP 10175868.8, mailed. |
NA, , “PCT/US 10/47955 International Search Report”, mailed Nov. 8, 2010. |
Torrens, M et al., “Visualizing and Exploring Personal Music Libraries”, Torrens, M. et al.: “Visualizing and Exploring Personal Music Libraries” Proceedings Annual International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, XX, XX; Oct. 10, 2004; whole document. |
PCT/US2006/034218; International Search Authority; PCT International Search Report Feb. 9, 2007; 3 pages. |
PCT/US06/38769; International Search Report Mar. 25, 2008. |
PCT/US06/48330; International Bureau; PCT Search Report and Written Opinion; Mar. 20, 2008; 10 pages. |
PCT/US09/42002; Filed Apr. 28, 2009; International Search Report and Written Opinion; Jun. 2009. |
PCT/US09/45911; Filed Jun. 2, 2009; International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2007/068708; International Search Report; May 10, 2007. |
Hofmann, T. “Latent Semantic Models for Collaborative Filtering”. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22:89-115, 2004. |
Lie, “The Electronic Broadsheet—All the News That Fits the Display,” MIT Master's Thesis, pp. 1-96 (Jun. 1991). |
www.roweinternational.com/jukeboxes—dia.html, Web Page, Digital Internet Access Jukeboxes, Rowe International. |
Jacucci, et al., Integrated Project on Interaction and Presence in Urban Environments. Feb. 9, 2007. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://ipcity.eu/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/D7.1%20-%20Demonstrator%20of%20Large-Scale%20Events%20Application.pdf> see p. 20. |
PCT/US07/068708; Filed May 10, 2007; International Search Report; WO 2007/134193; Dec. 7, 2007. |
Tom Bunzel, “Easy Digital Music,” QUE Publisher, Aug. 18, 2004, Chapters 5 and 8. |
Chao-Ming et al. (Chao-Ming), Design and Evaluation and mProducer: a Mobile Authoring Tool for Personal Experience Computing [online], MUM 2004, College Park, Maryland, USA, Oct. 27-29, 2004 [retrieved on Dec. 17, 2010]. [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.131.2933&rep=rep1&type=pdf]. |
PCT/US2006/003795; International Search Report for International Application, dated May 28, 2008. |
Apple: iTunes 4.2 User Guide for Windows; Dec. 2003; retrieved from the internet: URL: http://www2.austin.cc.tx.us/tcm/projects/itunes.pdf; pp. 10, 17-19. |
International Search Authority/US; PCT Search Report; Date Mar. 25, 2008; 3 Pages. |
PCT/US2006/003795; International Search Report and Written Opinion; May 28, 2008. |
Alvear, Jose, “Risk-Free Trial Streaming Media Delivery Tools,” Streaming Media.com; www.streamingmedia.com/article.ap?id=5768, Jun. 30, 2000. |
Deshpande, Mukund, et al., “Item-Based Top-N Recommendation Algoriths,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22:1 (Jan. 2004), pp. 143-177. |
Pachet, Francois, A Taxonomy of Musical Genres, Content-Based Multimedia Information Access Conference (RIAO), Paris, Apr. 2000, 8 pages. Not Submitted in IDS. |
Platt, John C. et al., “Learning a Gaussian Process Prior for Automatically Generating Music Playlists,” Microsoft Corporation {platt, cburgess, sswenson, chriswea}@microsoft.com, alcez@cs.berkeley,edu, pp. 1-9. |
Platt, John S., “Fasting Embedding of Sparse Music Similarity Graphs,” Microsoft Corporation, {jplatt@microsoft.com}. |
Smart Computing, “The Scoop on File-Sharing Services,” Dec. 2000, vol. 11, Issue 12; pp. 30-33 in printed issue. Available at www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2F2000%Fs1112%2F08s12.asp. |
www.akoo.com/Akoo/, Web Page, Akoo, Pick the Music, Waiting in the line at the Theme Park, Introducing the m-Venue™ platform. |
www.axcessnews.com/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=8327, Web Page, Feb. 24, 2006, Maintenance Fees, Digital Music Sales Triple to $1.1 Billion in 2005. |
www.bmi.com/news/200403/20040324b.asp, Web Page, BMI™ Figures Don't Lie, Mar. 24, 2004, Touch Tunes Signs License Agreement for BMI Music in Digital Jukeboxes. |
www.ecastinc.com/music—licensing.html, Web Page, ECAST Network, interactive entertainment network, Music/Licensing. |
www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1619/1/1, Web Page, RFID brings messages to Seattle side walks on RFID system being deployed next week will send marketing and assistive information to users carrying active RFID tags, RFID Journal (pp. 1-4). |
www.touchtunes.com, Web Page, Touchtunes, Turn your ROWE 100A's and 100B's into touch tunes Digital Jukeboxes—BOSE. |
www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=P12663 0 37 0 C, Web Page, Not Your Average Jukebox, On Hollywood 1000 contender Ecast uses broadbank to being the digital media experience to your watering hole. |
Cano, Pedro et al., On the Use of FastMap for Audio Retrieval and Browsing, The International Conference on Music Information Retrieval and Related Activities (ISMIR 2002), Paris, France, Oct. 2002, 2 pages. |
Connell, Iain et al., Ontological Sketch Models: Highlighting User-System Misfits, in P. Palanque, E. O'Neill and P. Johnson, editors, Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) Bath, England, Sep. 2003, London Springer, pp. 1-16. |
The Trustees of Indiana University, Varlations2, The Indiana University Digital Music Library, http://dml.indiana.edu/, last updated May 11, 2005, 1 page. |
Logan, Beth, Content-Based Playlist Generation: Exploratory Experiments, The International Conference on Music information Retrieval and Related Activities (ISMIR 2002), Paris, France, Oct. 2002, 2 pages. |
Logan, Beth et al., A Music Similarity Function Based on Signal Analysis, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Tokyo, Japan, Aug. 2001, IEEE Press, pp, 952-955. |
Maidin, Donncha O et al., The Best of Two Worlds: Retrieving and Browsing, Proceedings of the COST G-6 Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-00), Verona, Italy, Dec. 7-9, 2000, 4 pages. |
Notess, Mark et al., Variations2: Toward Visual Interface for Digital Music Libraries, Second International Workshop on Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, 2002, 6 pages. |
Pampalk, Elias et al., Content-based Organization and Visualization of Music Archives, ACM Multimedia, Juan les Pins, France, Dec. 2002, pp. 570-579. |
Pauws, Steffen et al., PATS: Realization and User Evaluation of an Automatic Playlist Generator, The international Conferences on Music Information Retrieval and Related Activities (ISMIR 2002), Paris, France, Oct. 2002, 9 pages. |
Rauber, Andreas et al., The SOM-enhanced JukeBox: Organization and Visualization of Music Collections Based on Perceptual Models, Journal of New Music Research, Vol, 32, Nov. 2, 2003, pp. 193-210. |
Shneiderman, Ben, Tree Visualization with Tree-Maps: 2-d Space-Filling Approach, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 92-99. |
Treemap, University of Maryland, http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/treemap/, last udpated Aug. 5, 2003, 4 pages. |
Shneiderman, Ben, Treemaps for Space-Contrained Visualization of Hierarchies, http://www.sc.umd.edu/heil/treemap-history/, last updated Apr. 28, 2006, 16 pages. |
Tzanetakis, George et al., MARSYAS3D: A Prototype Audio Browser-Editor Using a Large Scale Immersive Visual and Audio Display, Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Auditory Display, Espoo, Finland, Jul./Aug. 2001, 5 pages. |
“New Music Recommendation System is Based on FOAF Personal Profiling,” www.masternewmedia.org/music—recommendation/music—recommendation—system—FOAF, Oct. 1, 2005. |
“Social Networking Meets Music Listening: Mecora Launches Radio 2.0,” www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/04/13/social—networking—meets—music—listening.htm, Apr. 13, 2006. |
Strands Business Solutions. “Integration Document v.2.0”; Published May 2008; [online retrieved on Jan. 21, 2010] Retrieved from the internet <URL: http://recommender.strands.com/doc/SBS-Integration-Document.pdf>: entire document—18 pages. |
PCT/US09/68604 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; dated Feb. 17, 2010. |
John Thompson, “A Graphic Representation of Interaction With the NEXIS News Database,” MIT Thesis (May 1983). |
Lippman, et al., “News and Movies in the 50 Megabit Living Room,” IEEE/IEICE, Global Telecommunications Conference, pp. 1976-1981 (Nov. 15, 1987). |
Bender, et al., “Newspace: Mass Media and Personal Computing,” Proceedings of USENIX, Conference, pp. 329-348 (Summer 1991). |
Jonathan L. Orwant, “Doppelgänger: A User Modeling System,” MIT Bachelor's Thesis (Jun. 1991). |
“Lessons from LyricTimeTM: A Prototype Multimedia System” 4th IEEE ComSoc International Workshop on Multimedia Communications (Apr. 1992). |
Belkins, et al., “Information Filtering and Information Retrieval: Two Sides of the Same Coin?”, Communications of the ACM (Dec. 1992). |
Architecting Personalized Delivery of Multimedia Information,: Communications of the ACM (Dec. 1992). |
Jonathan L. Orwant, “Doppelgänger Goes to School: Machine Learning for User Modeling,” MIT Master of Science Thesis (Sep. 1993). |
Jon Orwant, “Appraising the User of User Models: Doppelgänger's Interface,” in: A. Kobsa and D. Litman (eds.), Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on User Modeling (1994). |
Bender, “Twenty Years of Personalization: All about the Daily Me,” Educause Review (Sep./Oct. 2002). |
PCT/ES2005/00003 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Report dated Jun. 10, 2005. |
PCT/ES2005/000213 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 12, 2006. |
PCT/ES2005/00003 Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority dated Mar. 19, 2007. |
PCT/ES2005/00003 International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Ch II) Report dated May 22, 2007. |
PCT/ES2005/000213 International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Ch II) Report Dated Nov. 15, 2007. |
ShopSmart: Product Recommendations through Technical Specifications and User Reviews; Alexander Yates et al. Temple University; CIKM; Oct. 26-30, 2008, Napa Valley, CA, USA; 2 pages. |
“Communications of the ACM” Dec. 1992, vol. 35, No. 12 at pp. 26-28 (Introduction to special issue regarding Workshop on High Performance Information Filtering, Morristown, N.J. Nov. 1991). |
Delivering Interactive Multimedia Documents over Networks; Shoshana Loeb; IEEE Communications Magazine; May 1992; 8 pages. |
PolyLens: A Recommender System for Groups of Users; M. O'Connor, D. Cosley, J.A. Konstan, J. Riedl; European Conference on Computer Supported Co-Operative Work at Bonn, Germany; Published 2001; pp. 199-218. |
Toward alernative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data, Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, Joan Smith, Rick Luce, Google.com, 2005, pp. 1-2. |
Incremental tensor analysis: theory and applications, Jimeng Sun, Dacheng Tao, Spiros Papadimitriou, Philip Yu, Christos Faloutsos, ACM, Oct. 2008, pp. 1-37. |
IEEE, no matched results, Nov. 11, 2009, 1 page. |
Augmenting the Social Space of an Academic Conference; McCarthy, et al. Information School, University of Washington and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota; pp. 1-10; Nov. 6-10, 2004. |
Baluja, S., Seth, R., Sivakumar, D., Jing, Y., Yagnik, J., Kumar, S., Ravichandran, D., and Aly, M. “Video Suggestion and Discovery for YouTube: Taking Random Walks Through the View Graph”. In WWW '08: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 895-904, Beijing, China, 2008. ACM Press. |
Carson et al. “Internet Banking Market Developments and Regulartory Issues in the New Ecomomy: what Changed, and the Challenges for Ecemonic Policy . . . ”; May 2001; http://www.occ.gov/netbank/SGEC2000.pdf. |
Co-Construction of Hybrid Spaces; Asa Rudstronn; A Dissertation submitted to the University of Stockholm in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy; Department of Computer and Systems Sciences Stockholm University and Royal Institute of Technology; pp. 1-69; Nov. 2005. |
Das,A., Datar,M., Garg,A., and Rajaram,S. “Google News Personalization: Scalable Online Collaborative Filtering”. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 271-280, New York; NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. |
Dean, J. and Ghemawat, S. “MapReduce: Simplied Data Processing on Large Clusters”. Commun. ACM, 51(1):107-113, 2008. |
Dempster, Y., Laird, N., and Rubin, D. “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm”. Jour. of the Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. B., 39:1047-1053, 1977. |
Hofmann, T. “Unsupervised Learning by Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis”. Mach. Learn., 42:177-196, 2001. |
http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2F2000%2Fs1112%2F08s12%2F08s12.asp. |
Industry Standard, The, Help FAQs for Standard Prediction Market, http://www.thestandard.com/help, downloaded Jun. 29, 2009. |
Indyk, P. and Matousek, J. “Low-Distortion Embeddings of Finite Metric Spaces”. In Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, pp. 177-196. CRC Press, 2004. |
International Search Report PCT/US2009/051233; Sep. 4, 2009; Strands, Inc. |
IP City, Integrated Project on Interaction and Presence on Urban Environments—Demonstrators on Large-Scale Events Applications; ipcity.eu; Giulio Jacucci, John Evans, Tommi Ilmonen; pp. 1-37; Feb. 9, 2007. |
Lazar, N.A.; Bayesian Empirical Likelihood; Technical Report, Carnegi Mellon University, Department of Statistics, 2000; 26 pages. |
MobiLenin—Combining A Multi-Track Music Video, Personal Mobile Phones and a Public Display into Multi-User Interactive Entertainment; Jurgen Scheible, et al. Media Lab, Univeristy of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland; pp. 1-10; Nov. 6-10, 2005. |
PCT/US07/068708; Filed May 10, 2007; International Search Report and Written Opinion; WO 2007/134193; Dec. 7, 2007. |
Scihira, I. “A Characterization of Singular Graphs”. Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra, 16:451-462, 2007. |
Toward University Mobile Interaction for Shared Displays; Tim Paek, et al.; Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA; pp. 1-4; Nov. 6-10, 2004. |
Trustees of Indiana University, Variations2, The Indiana University Digital Music Library, http://dmi.indiana.edu/, last updated May 11, 2005. |
Wolfers, Justin and Zitzewitz, Eric, Prediction Markets, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Spring 2004, pp. 107-126, vol. 18, No. 2. |
Yen, Yi-Wyn, Apple announces a 32GB iPhone 3G by Jun. 15, 2009, The Industry Standard, Apr. 2, 2009, http://www.thestandard.com/preditions/channel/hardware, downloaded Apr. 8, 2009. |
Apple: iTunes 4.2 User Guide for Windows; Dec. 2003; retrieved from the intemet: URL: http://www2.austin.cc.tx.us/tcm/projects/itunes.pdf; pp. 10, 17-19. |
PCT/US2007/09/45725; International Search Report—WO; Jul. 15, 2009. |
PCT/US2006/004257 European Search Report Oct. 23, 2009. |
N.A. Lazar; Bayesian Empirical Likelihood; Technical Report, Carnegi Mellon University, Department of Statistics, 2000; 26 pages. |
S. Baluja, R. Seth, D. Sivakumar, Y. Jing, J. Yagnik, S. Kumar, D. Ravichandran, and M. Aly, “Video Suggestion and Discovery for YouTube: Taking Random Walks Through the View Graph”. In WWW '08: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 895-904, Beijing, China, 2008. ACM Press. |
A. Das, M. Datar, A. Garg, and S. Rajaram. “Google News Personalization: Scalable Online Collaborative Filtering”. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 271-280, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. |
J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, “MapReduce: Simplied Data Processing on Large Clusters”. Commun. ACM, 51 (1):107-113, 2008. |
Y. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. “Maximum Likelihood fom Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm”. Jour. of the Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. B., 39:1047-1053, 1977. |
T. Hofmann. “Unsupervised Learning by Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis”. Mach. Learn., 42:177-196, 2001. |
T. Hofmann. “Latent Semantic Models for Collaborative Filtering”. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22:89-115, 2004. |
P. lndyk and J. Matousek. “Low-Distortion Embeddings of Finite Metric Spaces”. In Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, pp. 177-196, CRC Press, 2004. |
I. Scihira. “A Characterization of Singular Graphs”. Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra, 16:451-462, 2007. |
Mukund Deshpande et al., “Item-Based Top-N Recommendation Algorithms,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22:1 (Jan. 2004) pp. 143-177. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120233193 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60649945 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13106752 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 13476977 | US | |
Parent | 12984259 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13106752 | US | |
Parent | 12858229 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 12984259 | US | |
Parent | 11349370 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 12858229 | US |