Patent Application
20220186072
The technical field relates generally to the coatings. More particularly, the technical field relates to coatings for granular materials, such as granular fertilizer materials or the like, granular materials with coatings, and methods for coating granular materials. In one example, a coating may be added to granules of fertilizer to control the release of a component(s) and/or improve the mechanical properties of the granules.
Polymer coatings may be applied to granular materials such as fertilizers or the like. The substituent parts of the polymer may be applied in a reaction vessel and allowed to mix and cure on the granules. Polymer coated fertilizers typically release (e.g., nutrients and/or the like) at a slower rate than uncoated fertilizer which provides many economic and environmental benefits. Polymer coatings may also be applied to other granular substances for reasons such as reducing degradation or preventing contamination.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure or its application or uses.
Various embodiments contemplated herein include applying a coating to a granular material which may include but is not limited to any nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium (NPK) fertilizer. Non-limiting examples of such granular materials include mineral fertilizers or mineral salt fertilizers. Examples of such fertilizers may include fertilizers that include nitrate ions or ammonium ions. A non-limiting example list of granular materials may include urea, calcium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, potassium chloride, monoammonium phosphate, diammonium phosphate, and other fertilizers as well. In an exemplary embodiment, the coating includes a wax, a diisocyanate in either pure form or polymerized to some degree, and a polyol or a polyol mix.
The polyol may be a polyester or a polyether, or a mix thereof. In some examples, the polyol may be, for example, any combination of an aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol with a molecular weight (weight average) from about 500 to about 1200 Daltons such as a reaction product of glycerine and propylene oxide such as Polyol D (shown in Tables 1 and 2 of Polyol Properties), an aliphatic amine initiated trifunctional polyol such as Polyol B (shown in Tables 1 and 2 of Polyol Properties), castor oil or castor oil derivative such as Polyol A (shown in Tables 1 and 2 of Polyol Properties) and ethylene diamine that has been propoxylated and/or ethoxylated to an average molecular weight (weight average) from about 227 to about 282 Daltons, such as Polyol C (shown in Tables 1 and 2 of Polyol Properties). For each of the molecular weights described in this paragraph, the word “about” means +/−50 Daltons. The wax may be present or omitted in some embodiments. The coating is reacted on the surface of the granular material. Thus, a coated granular material may be produced.
In some examples, the coating may include between about 1% and about 20%, inclusively, where “about” is +/−0.5%, by weight of the coated granular material. Alternatively or in addition, in some examples, the coated granular material may have an average diameter of between about 0.8 mm and about 4 mm, inclusively, where “about” is +/−0.5 mm. In some examples, the coating process of the granular material with the coating may be conducted at a temperature of between about 120° F. and about 180 .I , inclusively, where “about” is +/−2° F.
The coating process may occur with the application of several layers of coating. In some examples, the layers may be the same polyol or polyol mix. Alternatively or in addition, different polyol or polyol mixes may be applied at different layers during the coating process. For example, one or more first layers of coating including a first polyol or polyol mix may be reacted onto the granular material followed by a second layer including a second polyol or polyol mix may be reacted onto the first layer. In some examples, as described in the examples herein, each coating layer may be applied to the granular material in a rotating drum. A residence time for the application of each layer, in some examples, may be between about 2 minutes and about 10 minutes, where “about” is +/−1 minute. The residence time for the application of each layer may vary, even to outside the stated range in some examples, depending on temperature, granular material, coating weight percentage, and number of layers.
In some examples, the coated granular material may be coated with only a single layer of coating. Alternatively, in some examples, the coated granular material may be coated with as many as 15 layers of coating, or more. In some examples, a final coating layer (outer coating) may be applied in 1.5 to 2 times the period of time in which the other coating layers are applied in order to allow the granular material to cure before being discharged to cooling.
Referring now to the drawings,
In one embodiment (referred to hereinafter as embodiment 1), the polyol is applied in the coating vessel 10 and includes from about 1% to about 99% alkoxylated ethylene diamine (e.g, Polyol C) and from about 1% to about 99% Castor Oil (e.g., Polyol A) or from about 1% to about 99% polyether polyol (e.g., Polyol D), where “about” is +/−1% for each of the ranges described. An isocyanate is applied which may be, for example, a partially polymerized methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI). Unless stated otherwise, all percentages (%) provided herein are on a weight percentage basis. Illustrations of embodiment 1 are described herein in at least
In another embodiment (referred to hereinafter as embodiment 2), the polyol is applied in the coating vessel 10 and includes from about 5% to about 100% of an about 500 to about 1200 Daltons molecular weight (weight average) glycerine initiated polyether polyol such as Polyol D and from 0% to 95% ethoxylated and/or propoxylated ethylene diamine such as Polyol C. The isocyanate applied may be a partially polymerized methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. A wax is applied which may be, for example, a high alpha (HA) olefin. When considering weight percentages, the word “about” as used in this paragraph, refers to +/−1%. When considering molecular weights, the word “about” as used in this paragraph, refers to +/−50 Daltons. Illustrations of embodiment 2 are described herein in at least Example 1, Example 2, and Example 12.
In another embodiment (referred to hereinafter as embodiment 3), the polyol is applied in the coating vessel 10 and includes from about 5% to about 100% Castor oil or Castor oil derivative (e.g., Polyol A), or about 500 to about 1000 Daltons (e.g., 700 Daltons) molecular weight (weight average) glycerine initiated polyether polyol (e.g., Polyol D), and from about 0% to about 100% ethoxylated and/or propoxylated aliphatic amine (e.g., Polyol B). When considering weight percentages, the word “about” as used in this paragraph, refers to +/−1%. When considering molecular weights, the word “about” as used in this paragraph, refers to +/−50 Daltons. An illustration of embodiment 3 is described herein in at least Example 11.
In embodiments 1, 2, and 3, the granules 6 enter a continuous coating drum 10 and are coated with a polyol or polyol mix, an isocyanate or isocyanate mix, which may be a polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI), and a wax, with repeating layers of polyol and isocyanate or isocyanate mix and/or wax as desired. The wax may be, for example, a petroleum or petrolatum wax, a microcrystalline wax, a paraffin wax or olefin wax. In one embodiment, the wax is a high alpha olefin wax with from 16 to 40 carbons in average chain length and has more than about 90% by weight chains of 30 or more carbons. Each layer may not necessarily contain a wax, isocyanate or isocyanate mix, polyol or polyol mix component. Each layer may include a different portion of wax. For example, a total amount of wax used may be split between a first layer and a third layer. The first layer may include, for example, about 60% of the total wax used in all layers of the coating and the third layer may include, for example, about 40% of the total wax used in all layers of the coating, where “about” means +/−5%. Proportions of the total wax used in the coatings may be adjusted as desired. The coating chemicals 9 may also be mixed before application to the granules 6.
The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to limit the various embodiments of coatings of granular materials, coated granular materials, and methods for coating granular materials in any way. In all of the examples described herein, a liquid precursor or precursor may be described. The precursor refers, generally, to ingredients that form the coating. The precursors may be the polyols, the wax, or the isocyanate used the coating, and the liquid precursors may be the precursors in liquid form.
A 3% total batch coating of granular urea (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 3 weight percent (wt. %) of the coated product (coated granular urea)), with a nominal size range of −5+10 (herein understood to mean minimal size of granules will pass through a 5 Tyler mesh sieve/screen (opening size of mesh sieve is about 0.157 inches (4.0 mm) but will be retained on a 10 Tyler mesh sieve/screen (opening size of mesh sieve is about 0.0661 inches (1.7 mm)), was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular urea for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 14.41 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 21.66 g of Polyol D and 6.01 g C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was about 0.665:1, where “about” includes mass ratios between 0.575:1 and 0.725:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% +/−0.2% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 3 lbs of granular urea and run at 8.3 RPM. The urea was maintained at a temperature of 160±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular urea in three substantially similar layers with the exception of wax. The wax was split 60:40 and placed on the first and third layers respectively. In other examples, the wax may be split into other proportions, or alternatively or in addition, the wax may be placed on layers other than the first or third layer. There were five minutes between the pMDI additions which allowed the precursor materials time to mix and fully react. In other examples, the time between the pMDI additions may be greater, for example 10 minutes, to allow the precursor materials time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular urea, the liquid precursors and granular urea were allowed to cure and roll in the drum for 8 minutes +/−1 minute. A cooling apparatus, such as a fan, may supply a cooling fluid, such as air, to cool the liquid precursors on the granular urea. In Example 1, a fan was set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular urea, resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 125° F. +/−5° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below:
A continuous coating of granular urea, with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The rotating drum dimensions were 2′×5′ for the coating section, 2′×9″ for the cooling section, and 2′×6.5″ for the screener section, however larger or smaller drums may be used. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), Polyol D and C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 0.665:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% +/−0.2% of the total coating weight. The coating apparatus was run at 6 RPM's with the urea feed rate set at 561 PPH. The coating apparatus had a 5″ end dam ring installed for to facilitate achieving a retention weight of 180 lbs and a total retention time of 20 minutes. The urea was introduced into the coating apparatus at 160° F. Substrate temperature was maintained at 160±2° F. through the entirety of the coating apparatus. Three pairs of nozzles (8 total nozzles) were placed above the surface of the rolling bed of urea. The first and third pair of nozzles includes a pMDI, polyol, and wax nozzle. The second pair includes a pMDI and polyol nozzle. Each nozzle pair was spaced to achieve approximately 5 minutes of retention between each for curing. Each liquid was metered in specific quantities to achieve a total product coating of 3.25% +/−0.5%. The wax was split 60:40 on the first and third nozzle pairs, respectively. After the final nozzle pair there was 8.5 minutes +/−1 minute of retention for curing and cooling. After the coated granules were cooled, the cooled coated granules entered the rotary screener and were then bagged. This coating test was performed for 2 hours and 25 minutes.
A 3% total batch coating of granular urea (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 3 wt. % of the coated product (coated granular urea)), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular urea for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 19.26 g +/−0.5 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 16.8 g +/−0.5 g of a 60/40 mixture of Polyol A and C, and 6.01 gC30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was about 1.15:1, where “about” include mass ratios from 1:1 to 1.3:1 pMDI:Polyol. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% +/−0.2% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 3 lbs of granular urea and run at 8.3 RPM. The urea was maintained at a temperature of 160±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular urea in three identical layers with the exception of wax. The wax was split 60:40 and placed on the first and third layers respectively. There were five minutes +/−1 minute between the polyol additions which allowed the precursors time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular urea, the liquid precursors and granular urea were allowed to cure and roll for 8 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular urea, resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 125° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below.
A 2.15% total batch coating of granular urea (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 2.15 wt. % of the coated product (coated granular urea)), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular urea for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 13.77 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 11.88 g of a 60/40 mixture of Polyol A and C, and 4.27 g C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 1.15:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 3 lbs of granular urea and run at 8.3 RPM. The urea was maintained at a temperature of 160±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular urea in three identical layers with the exception of wax. The wax was split 60:40 and placed on the first and third layers, respectively. There were five minutes between the polyol additions which allowed the precursors time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular urea, the liquid precursors and granular urea were allowed to cure and roll for 8 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular urea, resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 125° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below.
A 5.00% total batch coating of granular calcium nitrate (CN) (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 5 wt. % of the coated product (coated granular CN)), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular CN for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 45.16 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 36.68 g of a 60/40 mixture of Polyol A and C, and 13.64 g of a 50/50 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 1.23:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 4 lbs of granular CN and run at 8.3 RPM. The CN was maintained at a temperature of 130±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular CN in four identical layers with the exception of wax. The wax was placed on the first layer. There were five minutes between the polyol additions which allowed the precursors time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular CN, the liquid precursors and granular CN were allowed to cure and roll for 6 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular CN, resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 110° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below
EXAMPLE 6
A 5.00% total batch coating of granular calcium nitrate (CN) (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 5 wt. % of the coated product (coated granular CN)), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular CN for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 37.56 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 44.28 g of a 75/25 mixture of Polyol A and C, and 13.64 g of a 50/50 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 0.848:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 4 lbs of granular CN and run at 8.3 RPM. The CN was maintained at a temperature of 130±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular CN in three identical layers with the exception of wax. The wax was split 60:40 and placed on the first and third layers, respectively. There were four minutes between the polyol additions which allowed the precursors time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular CN, the liquid precursors and granular CN were allowed to cure and roll for 8 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular CN resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 110° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below
A 5.00% total batch coating of granular calcium nitrate (CN) (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 5 wt. % of the coated product (coated granular CN)), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular CN for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 45.75 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 36.09 g of a 50/50 mixture of Polyol A and C, and 13.64 g of a 50/50 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 1.27:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 4 lbs of granular CN and run at 8.3 RPM. The CN was maintained at a temperature of 130±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular CN in three identical layers with the exception of wax. The wax was split 60:40 and placed on the first and third layers, respectively. There were four minutes between the polyol additions which allowed the precursors time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular CN, the liquid precursors and granular CN were allowed to cure and roll for 8 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular CN resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 110° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below
A 5.00% total batch coating of granular calcium nitrate (CN) (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 5 wt. % of the coated product (coated granular CN)), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular CN for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 43.04 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 38.84 g of a 60/40 mixture of Polyol A and C, and 13.64 g of a 50/50 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 1.11:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 4 lbs of granular CN and run at 8.3 RPM. The CN was maintained at a temperature of 130±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular CN in three identical layers with the exception of wax. The wax was split 60:20:20 and placed on the first, third, and fourth layers respectively. There were five minutes between the polyol additions which allowed the precursors time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular CN, the liquid precursors and granular CN were allowed to cure and roll for 10 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular CN resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 110° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below
A 10.00% total batch coating of granular calcium nitrate (CN) (e.g., total coating in an amount of about 10 wt. % of the coated product (coated granular CN)), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. The drum dimensions were 14″×4″. The drum was equipped with a removable front dam and had a 6″ hole for easy access to the granular CN for liquids addition. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were 90.84 g of pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), 81.96 g of a 60/40 mixture of Polyol A and C, and 28.80 g of a 50/50 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ alpha olefin wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 1.11:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% of the total coating weight. The coating drum was filled with 4 lbs of granular CN and run at 8.3 RPM. The CN was maintained at a temperature of 130±2° F. for the entirety of the coating test. The coating was placed onto the granular CN in six identical layers with the exception of wax. The wax was split 30:20:30:20 and placed on the first, third, fourth, and sixth layers, respectively. There were four and a half minutes between the polyol additions which allowed the precursors time to mix and fully react. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular CN, the liquid precursors and granular CN were allowed to cure and roll for 9 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular CN resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 110° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below
A continuous coating of granular calcium nitrate (CN), with a nominal size range of −5+10, was performed in a rotating drum. Its dimensions were 2′×5′ for the coating section, 2′×9″ for the cooling section, and 2′×6.5″ for the screener section. The liquid precursors used to create the coating were pMDI (4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate), a 60/40 mixture of Polyol A and C, and a 50:50 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ HA wax. The pMDI:Polyol mass ratio used was 1.11:1. The total wax overcoat was 14.28% of the total coating weight. The coating apparatus was run at 6 RPM with the CN feed rate set at 400 PPH. The coating apparatus had a 5″ end dam ring installed which facilitated achieving a retention weight of 155 lbs and a total retention time of 23.5 minutes. The CN was introduced into the coating apparatus at 140° F. Substrate temperature was maintained at 140±3° F. through the entirety of the coating apparatus. Three pairs of nozzles (8 total nozzles) are placed above the surface of the rolling bed of CN. The first and third pair of nozzles includes a pMDI, polyol, and wax nozzle. The second pair includes a pMDI and polyol nozzle. Each nozzle pair was spaced to achieve approximately 5 minutes of retention between each for curing. Each liquid was metered in specific quantities to achieve a total product coating of 5.00% (wt. %). The wax was split 40:60 on the first and third nozzle pairs, respectively. After the final nozzle pair there was 8.5 minutes +/−1 minute of retention for curing and cooling. After the coated granules were cooled they entered the rotary screener and were then bagged. This coating test was performed for 1 hour and 20 minutes.
A 5% total batch coating of granular Calcium Nitrate with nominal size range of −5+10 Tyler Mesh was performed at in a 14″ diameter rotating drum with a depth of 4″ as described in the previous examples. The liquid precursors employed to create this coating were 46.40 g of pMDI, 35.44 g of a 1:3 mixture of Polyol A:Polyol B and 13.64 g of a 1:1 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ alpha olefin waxes. The coating drum was charged with 4 lbs of granular Calcium Nitrate and rotated at a speed of 8.3 RPM. The drum and contents were maintained at 130+/−2 ° F. for the duration of the liquid application times. The coating was applied in 3 equally split layers except all wax was split 40:60 between layers 1 and 3. There were 5 minutes between pMDI applications and 30 seconds between individual layer components. The final layer was allowed to cure for 10 minutes. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular CN, the liquid precursors and granular CN were allowed to cure and roll for 15 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular CN resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 109° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table is shown below:
A 5% total batch coating of granular Calcium Nitrate with nominal size range of −5+10 Tyler Mesh was performed at in a 14″ diameter rotating drum with a depth of 4″ as described in the previous examples. The liquid precursors employed to create this coating were 46.40 g of pMDI, 35.44 g of a 60:40 mixture of Polyol D:Polyol C and 13.64 g of a 50:50 mixture of C20-C24 and C30+ alpha olefin waxes. The coating drum was charged with 4 lbs of granular Calcium Nitrate and rotated at a speed of 8.3 RPM. The drum and contents were maintained at 130+/−2 ° F. for the duration of the liquid application times. The coating was applied in 4 equally split layers except all wax was applied in a single layer. There were 5 minutes between pMDI applications and 30 seconds between individual layer components. The final layer was allowed to cure for 10 minutes. After all liquid precursors were placed onto the granular CN, the liquid precursors and granular CN were allowed to cure and roll for 15 minutes +/−1 minute. A fan was then set up and blown on top of the rolling bed to cool the liquid precursors and granular CN resulting in the coated granular material. The coated granular material reached a final temperature of 109° F. +/−2° F.
An example of a coating schedule table and dissolution data are shown below:
As shown in Table 1 and Table 2 below, the polyester polyol may be, for example, castor oil or castor oil derivatives. Alternatively or in addition, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2, the polyether polyol may be, for example, aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol, aliphatic amine initiated trifunctional polol, or ethylene diamine having been propoxylated, ethoxylated, or combinations thereof.
Table 1 of Polyol Properties including example Values:
Table 2 of Polyol Properties including example Ranges:
To clarify the use of and to hereby provide notice to the public, the phrases “at least one of <A>, <B>, . . . and <N>” or “at least one of <A>, <B>, <N>, or combinations thereof” or “<A>, <B>, . . . and/or <N>” are defined by the Applicant in the broadest sense, superseding any other implied definitions hereinbefore or hereinafter unless expressly asserted by the Applicant to the contrary, to mean one or more elements selected from the group comprising A, B, . . . and N. In other words, the phrases mean any combination of one or more of the elements A, B, . . . or N including any one element alone or the one element in combination with one or more of the other elements which may also include, in combination, additional elements not listed.
While various embodiments have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible. Accordingly, the embodiments described herein are examples, not the only possible embodiments and implementations.
The subject-matter of the disclosure may also relate, among others, to the following aspects:
1. A method for coating a granular material, the method comprising:
2. The method according to aspect 1, wherein the polyester polyol comprises at least one of a castor oil or a castor oil derivative, and the polyether polyol comprises at least one of an aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol, an aliphatic amine initiated trifunctional polyol, or an ethylene diamine, the ethylene diamine having been propoxylated or ethoxylated.
3. The method according to any of aspects 1 to 2, further comprising applying the one or more layers of the coating on the granular material at a temperature of between 120° F. and 170° F.
4. The method according to any of aspects 1 to 3, wherein the coating is a first coating, the polyester polyol is a first polyester polyol, and the polyether polyol is a first polyether polyol, and
5. The method of any of aspects 1 to 4, wherein the applying one or more layers of the coating on the granular material comprises a residence time of between 2 and 7 minutes per layer.
6. The method of any of aspects 1 to 5, wherein the coated granular material comprises the coating in an amount between 1% and 20% by weight of the coated granular material, inclusively.
7. A coating for a granular material, the coating comprising:
8. The coating of aspect 7, wherein the polyester polyol comprises a castor oil or a castor oil derivative, and the polyether polyol comprises an aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol, an aliphatic amine initiated trifunctional polyol, or an ethylene diamine, the ethylene diamine having been propoxylated or ethoxylated.
9. The coating of aspect 8, wherein the coating comprises the polyol mix, the polyol mix comprising the ethylene diamine and a composition selected from the group consisting of the castor oil, the castor oil derivatives, the aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol, and mixtures thereof.
10. The coating of aspect 9, wherein the polyol mix comprises the aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol.
11. The coating of any of aspects 9 to 10, wherein the polyol mix comprises at least one of the castor oil or the castor oil derivative.
12. The coating of any of aspects 8 to 11, wherein the coating comprises the polyol mix, and the polyol mix comprises the aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol and the ethylene diamine.
13. The coating of any of aspects 8 to 12, wherein the coating comprises the polyol mix, and the polyol mix comprises the aliphatic amine initiated trifunctional polyol and at least one of the castor oil or the castor oil derivative.
14. The coating of any of aspects 8 to 13, wherein the coating comprises the polyol mix, and the polyol mix comprises the aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol and the aliphatic amine initiated trifunctional polyol.
15. A coated granular material comprising:
16. The coated granular material according to aspect 15, wherein the polyester polyol comprises castor oil or castor oil derivative and the polyether polyol comprises an aliphatic glycerine initiated polyether polyol, an aliphatic amine initiated trifunctional polyol, or an ethylene diamine, the ethylene diamine having been propoxylated or ethoxylated.
17. The coated granular material according to any of aspects 15 to 16, wherein the coated granular material comprises the reaction product in an amount between 1% and 20% by weight of the coated granular material, inclusively.
18. The coated granular material according to any of aspects 15 to 17, wherein the granular material comprises a mineral fertilizer or a mineral salt fertilizer.
19. The coated granular material according to aspect 18, wherein the granular material comprises ammonium ions or nitrate ions.
20. The coated granular material according to any of aspects 15 to 20, wherein the coated granular material has an average diameter between 0.8 mm and 4 mm.
As a person skilled in the art will readily appreciate, the above description is meant as an illustration of the implementation of the principles of this invention. This description is not intended to limit the scope or application of this invention in that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation, and change, without departing from the spirit of this invention as defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/786,987 filed Feb. 10, 2020, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/725,684 filed Oct. 5, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/404,254, filed Oct. 5, 2016, all of which are entirely incorporated by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62404254 | Oct 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16786987 | Feb 2020 | US |
| Child | 17687528 | US | |
| Parent | 15725684 | Oct 2017 | US |
| Child | 16786987 | US |
