Quantum microwave transmission is a requirement of modular superconducting quantum computers and distributed quantum networks. Realizing large-scale quantum computers with thousands (or millions) of qubits requires coherent quantum transmission between distant quantum nodes.
This architecture of remotely connecting quantum modules, also known as the modular quantum computer, is believed to overcome the current challenges that obstacle scaling up quantum computers, such as cross talks, input/output coupling limitations, and bound space. Quantum sensing and networks require coherent quantum transmissions with applicable implementation of superconducting based quantum circuits (which have shown exceptional potential for quantum signal processing and computation). However, the superconducting signals are fragile against the thermal energy as they operate at the microwave frequency spectrum. Therefore, superconducting circuits are typically housed in cryostats-refrigeration.
One existing approach is based on entangling distant superconducting circuits using coaxial cables carrying microwave photons or acoustic channels carrying phonons. The reported transmission lengths using this technique is between one and two meters. Another existing approach uses a cooled microwave waveguide at cryogenic temperature. Where a five meters coherent microwave transmission was reported. The above two approaches require housing the transmission channels in dilution refrigerators, which require substantial financial and logistical investments.
Adding qubit for a superconducting quantum computer requires connecting considerable number of cables, and related components, which imposes an overwhelming heating load. For example, the cost per qubit is estimated to be about $10,000 to maintain the required cryogenic refrigeration while handling the pertinent cabling connections. It then follows that the cost of a scaled quantum computer that utilizes a giant dilution refrigerator is expected to be in the billions of dollars. Currently, there is no system or method for transmitting coherent quantum microwave fields at room temperature.
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings may identify the same or similar elements.
Systems, devices, and/or methods described herein may provide for coherent microwave transmission using a microwave waveguide at room temperature. In embodiments, the systems, devices, and/or methods described herein, include two cryogenic nodes (e.g., transmitter and receiver) connected by a room temperature microwave waveguide. In embodiments, at the receiver side, a cryogenic loop antenna coupled to an LC harmonic oscillator (with L representing an inductor and C representing a capacitor) is implemented inside an output port of the waveguide, while the LC harmonic oscillator is located outside the waveguide. In embodiments, the loop antenna converts quantum microwave fields (which include both signal and thermal noise photons) to quantum voltage across the coupled LC harmonic oscillator.
Accordingly, the loop antenna can be designed so that (1) the number of detected noise photons can be significantly made less than one, and (2) the detected signal photons can be maintained sufficiently greater than one by transmitting large enough number of photons at an input port of the waveguide. In a non-limiting example, we have shown that for a 10 GHz microwave signal, coherent photons are received using meters room temperature waveguide by transmitting 8×104 signal photons at the waveguide input. In this non-limiting example, the number of the noise photons is maintained as small as 2.6×10′, while 8 coherent signal photons are received.
In embodiments, by further providing a level of cooling for the connecting waveguide, the proposed coherent transmission system can be extended to larger distances (e.g., the distance being the length of the waveguide). In a non-limiting example, by cooling the transmission waveguide to the liquid air temperature to 78 K, the same number of 8 coherent signal photons can be achieved with 5.4×10−3 noise photons for a 35 meters waveguide length by transmitting 8×104 photons. Accordingly, these example designs can allow modular quantum computers with a much simpler architecture.
In embodiments, conducted by the principle of Faraday's Law of Induction, the loop antenna converts the microwave fields to microwave voltages across LC harmonic oscillator 106. In embodiments, the induced voltages in LC harmonic oscillator 106 include both a transmitted signal and a thermally generated noise. Furthermore, by designing the loop antenna at particular dimensions, the number of induced noise photons in LC harmonic oscillator 106 can be made significantly smaller than one.
However, in embodiments, the number of induced signal photons in LC harmonic oscillator 106 can be maintained by transmitting a particular number of photons at the input port 104 of the waveguide (e.g., by using a cryogenic per-amplifications). Accordingly, as shown in
As described in
In embodiments, a motion equation of the propagating TE10 mode in the microwave waveguide is
where û is an annihilation operator of the TE10 mode, is a decay coefficient, {circumflex over (n)}(t) is a quantum Langevin noise operator that obeys the relation
In embodiments, the expression of the field operator û(t) at the output of the rectangular waveguide is given by equation (1):
In embodiments,
is the interaction propagation time, l is a waveguide length, and vg is a group velocity of the TE10 mode. In embodiments, by using the system in
û(t)†û(t)=û(0)†û(0)e−Γt+nth(1−e−Γt),
Where the first term û(0)†û(0)e−Γt is the number of TE10 signal photons (herein denoted as Ms) while the second term is the number of thermally generated noise photons (herein denoted as Mn).
In embodiments, for suppressing noise photons and achieve coherent signal transmission, a superconducting loop antenna is implemented inside a waveguide output port and subjected to the TE10 mode flux. In embodiments, an LC harmonic oscillator (e.g., LC harmonic oscillator 102) placed outside the waveguide is coupled to the loop antenna (as shown in
{circumflex over (b)}†{circumflex over (b)}=ηû(0)†û(0)e−Γt+ηnth(1−e−Γt)
In embodiments, the first term, ηû(0)†û(0)e−Γt is the number of induced signal photons (herein denoted as Ns) while the second term, ηnth(1−e−Γt), is the number of induced noise photons (herein denoted as Nn). In embodiments,
where C is capacitance, Wr and hr are width and height, respectively, of the loop antenna. In embodiments, the dimensions of the loop antenna can be designed (by controlling the η parameter) to eliminate the induced noise by determining the number of the induced noise photons to be less than one (1). In embodiments, at the same time, the number of signal photons can be maintained by having a particular number of transmitted photons. In embodiments, this can be achieved by a cryogenic pre-amplification.
In embodiments, the entire waveguide is operating at the room temperature. In embodiments, there is an over estimation for the generated noise photons as the two terminals of the waveguide are cooled by their physical contacts with the cryostats (e.g., 108 and 110 as shown in
In embodiments, connecting separated quantum nodes (or processors) by coherent signaling is an efficient approach for efficient scaled quantum computation. As described in the various figures and examples, a direct coherent microwave transmission is occurring without refrigeration. In embodiments, modular quantum computer using waveguides are placed outside the dilution refrigerators with a coherent transmission of a microwave signal of frequency 10 GHz over five (5) meters can be achieved at room temperature by transmitting 8×104 signal photons at the input of the waveguide. In this non-limiting example, eight (8) coherent photons are received while the number of the noise photons is significantly less than one (6.3×10−3 photons). In embodiments, cryogenic pre-amplification can be utilized at a waveguide input to allow for the needed number of photons.
In embodiments, by providing a mild cooling for the transmission waveguide, the described systems, devices, and methods can be extended to longer transmission distances. In a non-limiting example, by using a liquid nitrogen cooling system, the transmission waveguide temperature can be maintained at 78K temperature. In addition, in this non-limiting example, the transmission length canbe extended to 35 meters with the same number of received coherent signal photons and suppressed noise photons. Accordingly, modular superconducting quantum computer can be designed with the potential of thousands, or millions, of qubits.
In a non-limiting example, consider a microwave waveguide with a rectangular cross-sectional sectional geometry of width W along thex-axis, and a height h along the y-axis. In this non-limiting example, electric and magnetic fields expressions associated witha fundamental TE10 mode of this waveguide is given by equations (4) and (5):
where A is the complex amplitude of the TE10 mode,
is the impedance of a filing material and
In embodiments, ω is a microwave signal frequency,
is a cutoff frequency, and μr and ϵr are the relative permeability and permittivity of the filing material, respectively, β is the propagation constant, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum.
In embodiments, the classical Hamiltonian of the TE10 mode is given by H=½∈0∈eff|A|2ZF2ΩZVol+½μ0μeff|A|2Ω2Vol, where Vol=W×h×l is a waveguide volume and l is a waveguide length. In embodiments, the propagating microwave field can be quantized through the following relationship in equation (6):
In embodiments, â is an annihilation operator of the TE10 mode,
is an effective permittivity of the waveguide. Accordingly, =hωâ†â. In embodiments, the motion equation can be found by substituting the quantum Hamiltonian into the Heisenberg equation,
resulting in
In embodiments, by implementing a rotation approximation by setting â=ûe(−iωt), the motion equation is equation (7) as follows:
In embodiments, γ=α/vg is a decay time coefficient, with
as the attenuation coefficient,
is the group velocity, and {circumflex over (n)} is the quantum Langevin noise operator. In embodiments, Rs is the surface impedance of the waveguide metal material.
In embodiments, a superconducting loop antenna of width Wr along the x-axis and height hr along the y-axis is implemented at the output port of the waveguide and is subjected to a TE10 flux. In embodiments, the loop antenna (e.g., using a NbTi) is coupled to a LC harmonic oscillator. In embodiments, classically, the induced voltage across the LC circuit can be described by Faraday's law of induction, and given by equation (8) as follows:
In embodiments, ψ=∫0W
VI=iμ0μrAhrWr
In embodiments, the voltage across the LC circuit can be quantized through the following equation as shown in equation (10):
In embodiments, {circumflex over (b)} is the annihilation operator of the voltage in the LC harmonic oscillator, C is the capacitance,
and L is the inductance. In embodiments, by using equation (6) and equation (10), a direct relation between the annihilation operators of the TE10 mode and the LC voltage can be established by equation (11) as follows:
As shown in
Bus 510 may include a path that permits communications among the components of device 500. Processor 520 may include one or more processors, microprocessors, or processing logic (e.g., a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)) that interprets and executes instructions. Memory 530 may include any type of dynamic storage device that stores information and instructions, for execution by processor 520, and/or any type of non-volatile storage device that stores information for use by processor 520. Input component 540 may include a mechanism that permits a user to input information to device 500, such as a keyboard, a keypad, a button, a switch, voice command, etc. Output component 550 may include a mechanism that outputs information to the user, such as a display, a speaker, one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs), etc.
Communications interface 560 may include any transceiver-like mechanism that enables device 500 to communicate with other devices and/or systems. For example, communications interface 560 may include an Ethernet interface, an optical interface, a coaxial interface, a wireless interface, or the like.
In another implementation, communications interface 560 may include, for example, a transmitter that may convert baseband signals from processor 520 to radio frequency (RF) signals and/or a receiver that may convert RF signals to baseband signals. Alternatively, communications interface 560 may include a transceiver to perform functions of both a transmitter and a receiver of wireless communications (e.g., radio frequency, infrared, visual optics, etc.), wired communications (e.g., conductive wire, twisted pair cable, coaxial cable, transmission line, fiber optic cable, waveguide, etc.), or a combination of wireless and wired communications.
Communications interface 560 may connect to an antenna assembly (not shown in
As will be described in detail below, device 500 may perform certain operations. Device 500 may perform these operations in response to processor 520 executing software instructions (e.g., computer program(s)) contained in a computer-readable medium, such as memory 530, a secondary storage device (e.g., hard disk, CD-ROM, etc.), or other forms of RAM or ROM. A computer-readable medium may be defined as a non-transitory memory device. A memory device may include space within a single physical memory device or spread across multiple physical memory devices. The software instructions may be read into memory 530 from another computer-readable medium or from another device. The software instructions contained in memory 530 may cause processor 520 to perform processes described herein. Alternatively, hardwired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement processes described herein. Thus, implementations described herein are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
In embodiments, device 600 may receive communication 602 and, based on one or more of equations (1) to (11), as described above, that generate output 604 that includes information about waveguide length, loop design features, and/or other information associated with equations (1) to (11).
In embodiments, various analysis and computerized simulation tools can be used to investigate temperature distribution as well as the microwave propagation along the waveguide. In a non-limiting example, an aluminum waveguide of five (5) meters in length and 5 centimeters (cm) by 2.5 cm cross sectional area of the waveguide is considered. In this non-limiting example, the boundary conditions are 3 mK at the two waveguide ends while the ambient along the waveguide is considered at room temperature (e.g., around 20 degrees Celsius). Furthermore, in this non-limited example, estimations for the added noise of pre-amplifiers are made to show that the thermally generated noise during transmission is substantially dominating the noise generation at the receiver side.
As shown in
In a non-limiting example, the microwave propagation is simulated under the temperature distributions shown in
In embodiments, superconducting quantum circuits, placed in dilution refrigerators, the signal amplification is composed of two stages. In embodiments, the first stage is conducted at few milli-Kelvin cryogenic temperature using a traveling wave parametric (TWPA) amplifier. In embodiments, the second stage is conducted at a Kelvin cryogenic temperature (e.g., 3 Kelvin) using a cryogenic low-noise amplifier. In embodiments, in an example transmission system, as described in one or more figures, the contribution of the noise generated by the cryogenic pre-amplifiers (named hereafter as the amplification-noise) to the detected noise level at the receiver is negligibly small as compared to the thermally generated photons during transmission.
In a non-limiting example, for a quantum signal of 10 photons and 10′ noise photons (such as generated by a source processor at the transmitter), the launched noise to the waveguide input port is 8.101 amplification noise photons (for an amplified signal of 8×104 photons). In this non-limiting example, a TWPA amplifier of 10 dB gain occurs, and an off-the-shelf commercially available cryogenic amplifier of 29 dB gain and 0.055 dB Noise-Figure. Accordingly, it follows that the number of the amplification-noise photons at the output port of 5 meters waveguide is 7.792. As such, the number of the induced amplification-noise photons across the LC circuit at the receiver is 2.24×10′. Thus, this number of induced amplification-noise photons across the LC circuit is a negligible contribution as compared to the thermally generated noise photons during transmission (such as 8.8%).
Even though particular combinations of features are recited in the claims and/or disclosed in the specification, these combinations are not intended to limit the disclosure of the possible implementations. In fact, many of these features may be combined in ways not specifically recited in the claims and/or disclosed in the specification. Although each dependent claim listed below may directly depend on only one other claim, the disclosure of the possible implementations includes each dependent claim in combination with every other claim in the claim set.
While various actions are described as selecting, displaying, transferring, sending, receiving, generating, notifying, and storing, it will be understood that these example actions are occurring within an electronic computing and/or electronic networking environment and may require one or more computing devices, as described in
No element, act, or instruction used in the present application should be construed as critical or essential unless explicitly described as such. Also, as used herein, the article “a” is intended to include one or more items and may be used interchangeably with “one or more.” Where only one item is intended, the term “one” or similar language is used. Further, the phrase “based on” is intended to mean “based, at least in part, on” unless explicitly stated otherwise.
In the preceding specification, various preferred embodiments have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8213476 | Wanke | Jul 2012 | B1 |
10483610 | U-Yen | Nov 2019 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
Severin Dias, et al., A Quantum Logic Gate between Distant Quantum Network Modules, Science, Feb. 5, 2021, pp. 614-617, vol. 371, AAAS, Washington DC, USA. |
Youpeng Zhong, et al, Deterministic Multi-Qubit Entanglement in a Quantum Network, Nature, Feb. 25, 2021, pp. 571-575, vol. 590, Macmillan Publishers Limited, New York, USA. |
P. Magnard, et al., Microwave Quantum Link between Superconducting Circuits Housed in Spatially Separated Cryogenic Systems, Physical Review Letters, Dec. 20, 2020, pp. 260502-1 to 260502-7, vol. 125, American Physical Society, College Park, USA. |
John G. Bartholomew, et al., On-Chip Coherent Microwave-to-Optical Transduction Meditated by Ytterbium in YVO4, Nature Communications, Jun. 29, 2020, pp. 1-6, vol. 11-3266, Macmillan Publishers Limited, New York, USA. |
Daniel Gottesman and Isaac L. Chuang, Demonstrating the Viability of Universal Quantum Computation Using Teleportation and Single Qubit Operations, Nature, Nov. 25, 1999, pp. 390-393, vol. 402, MacMillan Magazines, New York, USA. |
T.E. Northrup and R. Blatt, Quantum Information Transfer Using Photons, Nature Photonics, Apr. 25, 2014, pp. 356-363, vol. 8, Macmillan Publishers Limited, New York, USA. |
Liang Jang, et al., Distributed Quantum Computation Based on Small Quantum Registers, Physical Review A, Dec. 26, 2007, pp. 062323-1 to 062323-22, vol. 76, American Physical Society, College Park, USA. |
C. Monroe, et al.., Large-Scale Modular Quantum-Computer Architecture with Atomic Memory and Photonic Interconnects, Physical Review A, Feb. 13, 2014, pp. 022317-1 to 022317-16, vol. 89, American Physical Society, College Park, USA. |
S. Krinner et al., Engineering Cryogenic Setups for 100-Qubit Scale Superconducting Circuit Systems, EPJ Quantum Technology, May 28, 2019, pp. 1-29, vol. 6:2, Springer, New York, USA. |
T.D. Ladd, et al., Quantum Computers, Nature, Mar. 4, 2010, pp. 45-53, vol. 464, Macmillan Publishers Limited, New York, USA. |
David Awschalom, et al., Development of Quantum Interconnects (QuICs) for Next Generation information Technologies, PRX Quantum, Feb. 24, 2021, pp. 017002-1 to 017002-21, vol. 2, American Physical Society, College Park, USA. |
H.J. Kimble, The Quantum Internet, Nature, Jun. 19, 2008, pp. 1023-1030, vol. 453, Macmillan Publishers Limited, New York, USA. |
Stephanie Wehner and David Elkouss and Ronald Hanson, Quantum Internet: A Vision for the Road Ahead, Science, Oct. 19, 2018, pp. 1-9, vol. 362, AAAS, Washington DC, USA. |
L.J. Stephenson, et al., High-Rate, High Fidelity Entanglement of Qubits Across an Elementary Quantum Network, Physical Review Letters, Mar. 16, 2020, pp. 110501-1 to 110501-6, vol. 124, American Physical Society, College Park, USA. |
Zheshan Zhang, et al., Entanglement-Enhanced Sensing in a Lossy and Noisy Environment, Physical Review Letters, Mar. 20, 2015, pp. 110506-1 to 110506-6, vol. 114, American Physical Society, College Park, USA. |
J.E. Mooji, et al., Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit, Science, Aug. 13, 1999, pp. 1036-1039, vol. 285, AAAS, Washington, DC, USA. |
Frank Arute, et al., Quantum Supremacy using a Programmable Superconducting Processor, Nature, Oct. 24, 2019, pp. 505-511, vol. 574, Springer Nature Limited, London, United Kingdom. |
Christopher J. Axline, et al., On-Demand Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Between Remote Microwave Cavity Memories, Nature Physics, 2018, pp. 1-8, no volume cited, Macmillan Publishers Limited, New York, USA. |
P. Kurpiers, et al., Deterministic Quantum State Transfer and Remote Entanglement using Microwave Photons, Nature, Jun. 14, 2018, pp. 1-17, vol. 558, Macmillan Publishers Limited, New York, USA. |
Youpeng Zhong, et al., Deterministic Multi-Qubit Entanglement in a Quantum Network, Nature, Feb. 25, 2021, pp. 1-6, vol. 590, Springer Nature Limited, London, United Kingdom. |
A. Bienfait, et al., Phonon-Mediated Quantum State Transfer and Remote Qubit Entanglement, Science, Apr. 26, 2019, pp. 368-371, vol. 364 (6438), AAAS, Washington DC, USA. |
J. Gambetta, IBM's Roadmap for Scaling Quantum Technology, IBM Research Blog, Sep. 15, 2020, pp. 1-7, no volume cited, IBM, Armonk, USA. |
Montasir Qasymeh and Hichem El Euch, Quantum Microwave-to-Optical Conversion in Electrically Driven Multilayer Graphene, Optics Express, Mar. 4, 2019, pp. 5945-5960, vol. 27, No. 5, Optica, Washington DC, USA. |
Mohammad Mirhosseini, et al., Superconducting Qubit to Optical Photon Transduction, Nature, Dec. 23, 2020, pp. 599-612, vol. 588, Springer Nature Limited, London, United Kingdom. |
Ming Gong, et al., Quantum Walks on a Programmable Two-Dimensional 62-Qubit Superconducting Processor, Science, May 28, 2021, pp. 948-952, vol. 372, AAAS, Washington DC, USA. |
Gideon Lichfield, Inside the Race to Build the Best Quantum Computer on Earth, MIT Technology Review, Feb. 26, 2020, pp. 1-19, vol. Mar./Apr. 2020, MIT, Cambridge, USA. |
John Levy, 1 Million Qubit Computers: Moving Beyond the Current “Brute Force” Strategy, SEEQC, 2020, pp. 1-4, no volume cited, SEEQC, Elmsford, NY, USA. |
C. Macklin, et al., A Near Quantum-Limited Josephson Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifier, Sciencexpress/Science, Sep. 3, 2015, pp. 1-8, vol. 350, AAAS, Washington, DC, USA. |
Udson C. Mendes, et al., Parametric Amplification and Squeezing with an AC- and DC-Voltage Biased Superconducting Junction, Physical Review Applied, Mar. 14, 2019, pp. 034035-1 to 034035-13, vol. 11, American Physical Society, College Park, USA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220407201 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |