System for concentrating magnetic flux of a multi-pole magnetic structure

Abstract

An improved system for concentrating magnetic flux of a multi-pole magnetic structure at the surface of a ferromagnetic target uses pole pieces having a magnet-to-pole piece interface with a first area and a pole piece-to-target interface with a second area substantially smaller than the first area, where the target can be a ferromagnetic material or a complementary pole pieces. The multi-pole magnetic structure can be a coded magnetic structure or an alternating polarity structure comprising two polarity directions, or can be a hybrid structure comprising more than two polarity directions. A magnetic structure can be made up of discrete magnets or can be a printed magnetic structure.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to a system for concentrating magnetic flux of a multi-pole magnetic structure. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system for concentrating magnetic flux of a multi-pole magnetic structure using pole pieces having a magnet-to-pole piece interface with a first area and a pole piece-to-target interface with a second area substantially smaller than the first area, where the target can be a ferromagnetic material or complementary pole pieces.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the invention includes a system for concentrating magnetic flux including a multi-pole magnetic structure comprising one or more pieces of a magnetizable material having a plurality of polarity regions for providing a magnetic flux, the magnetizable material having a first saturation flux density, the plurality of polarity regions being magnetized in a plurality of magnetization directions and a plurality of pole pieces of a ferromagnetic material for integrating the magnetic flux across the plurality of polarity regions and directing the magnetic flux at right angles to at least one target, the ferromagnetic material having a second saturation flux density, each pole piece of the plurality of pole pieces having a magnet-to-pole piece interface with a corresponding polarity region and a pole piece-to-target interface with the at least one target, and having an amount of the ferromagnetic material sufficient to achieve the second saturation flux density at the pole piece-to-target interface when in a closed magnetic circuit, the magnet-to-pole piece interface having a first area, the pole piece-to-target interface having a second area, the magnetic flux being routed into the pole piece via the magnet-to-pole interface and out of the pole piece via the pole piece-to-target interface, the routing of said magnetic flux through the pole piece resulting in an amount of concentration of the magnetic flux at the pole piece-to-target interface corresponding to the ratio of the first area divided by the second area, the amount of concentration of said magnetic flux corresponding to a maximum force density.

The polarity regions can be separate magnets, printed magnetic regions on a single piece of magnetizable material, or a combination thereof.

Printed magnetic regions can be stripes, which can be groups of printed maxels. Printed magnetic regions can be separated by non-magnetized regions.

The polarity regions can have a substantially uniformly alternating polarity pattern.

The polarity regions can have a polarity pattern in accordance with a code having a code length greater than 2 such as a Barker code.

The target can be a ferromagnetic material and can be a complementary pole piece.

The system may also include a shunt plate for producing a magnetic flux circuit between at least two polarity regions of said plurality of polarity regions.

Each of the plurality of polarity regions can have one of a first magnetization direction or a second magnetization direction that is opposite to said first magnetization direction.

Each of the plurality of polarity regions can have one of a first magnetization direction, a second magnetization direction that is opposite to said first magnetization direction, a third magnetization direction that is perpendicular to said first magnetization direction, or a fourth magnetization direction that is opposite to said third magnetization direction.

The thickness of the one or more pieces of magnetizable material can be sufficient to just provide the magnetic flux having the first flux density at the magnet-to-pole interface as required to achieve the maximum force density at the pole piece-to-target interface.

The length of at least one pole piece of the plurality of pole pieces can be substantially equal to a length of at least one polarity region of the plurality of polarity regions.

The length of at least one pole piece of the plurality of pole pieces can be less than a length of at least one polarity region of the plurality of polarity regions.

The length of at least one pole piece of the plurality of pole pieces can be greater than a length of at least one polarity region of the plurality of polarity regions.

At least one pole piece of the plurality of pole pieces and the at least one target can have a male-female type interface.

At least one pole piece of the plurality of pole pieces can be tapered.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Additionally, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.

FIG. 1A depicts an exemplary magnetic field of a magnet.

FIG. 1B depicts the magnet of FIG. 1A with a pole piece on one side.

FIG. 1C depicts the magnet of FIG. 1A having pole pieces on opposite sides of the magnet.

FIGS. 2A and 2B depict portions of exemplary magnetic fields between two adjacent magnets having an opposite polarity relationship and pole pieces on one side of each magnet.

FIGS. 3A and 3B depict portions of exemplary magnetic fields between two adjacent magnets having an opposite polarity relationship and pole pieces on opposite sides of each magnet.

FIG. 4A depicts an exemplary magnetic structure comprising two spaced magnets having an opposite (or alternating) polarity relationship attached by a shunt plate and attached to a target such as a piece of iron.

FIG. 4B depicts an exemplary magnetic flux circuit created by the shunt plate and the target.

FIG. 4C depicts an exemplary magnetic structure comprising four magnets having an alternating polarity relationship having a shunt plate and attached to a target.

FIG. 4D depicts an oblique projection of the magnetic structure of FIG. 4C approaching the target.

FIG. 5A depicts an exemplary flux concentrator device in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5B depicts an exemplary magnetic flux circuit produced using a shunt plate and one side of the magnets and a target that spans two pole pieces on the opposite side of the magnets.

FIG. 5C depicts three exemplary magnetic flux circuits produced by the exemplary flux concentrator device of FIG. 5A and a target.

FIG. 6A shows an exemplary flux concentrator device similar to the device of FIG. 5A except the pole pieces extend both above and below the magnetic structure.

FIG. 6B shows an exemplary flux concentrator device similar to the device of FIG. 5A except the pole pieces are the full length of the magnets making of the magnetic structure and do not extend above or below the magnetic structure.

FIG. 6C shows an exemplary flux concentrator device similar to the device of FIG. 5A except the pole pieces are shorter than the magnets of the magnetic structure where the pole pieces are configured to accept targets at the top of the device.

FIG. 6D shows an exemplary flux concentrator device similar to the device of FIG. 5A except the pole pieces are shorter than the magnets of the magnetic structure where the pole pieces are configured to accept targets at the top and bottom of the device.

FIG. 6E depicts additional pole pieces having been added to the upper portions of the magnets in the device of FIG. 6C in order to provide protection to the surfaces of the magnets.

FIGS. 7A-7E depict various exemplary flux concentrator devices having pole pieces on both sides of the magnetic structures.

FIG. 8A depicts an exemplary flux concentrating device comprising three magnetic structures like those of FIG. 7A except the magnets in the middle structure are each rotated 180° compared to the magnets in the two outer most structures.

FIG. 8B depicts an exemplary flux concentrating device like that of FIG. 8A except the pole pieces in the inside of the device are configured to accept targets the recess into the device.

FIGS. 9A-9G depict various exemplary male-female type interfaces.

FIG. 10A depicts an exemplary flux concentrator device like that shown previously in FIG. 5A, where the magnetic structure has a polarity pattern in accordance with a Barker 4 code.

FIG. 10B depicts another exemplary flux concentrator device like that of FIG. 10A, where the magnetic structure has a polarity pattern that is complementary to the magnetic structure of FIG. 10A.

FIGS. 11A and 11B depict complementary Barker-4 coded flux concentrator devices that like those of FIGS. 10A and 10B.

FIG. 12 depicts four Barker-4 coded flux concentrator devices oriented in an array.

FIGS. 13A and 13B depict two variations of self-complementary Barker4-2 coded flux concentrator devices.

FIG. 14 depicts exemplary tapered pole pieces.

FIG. 15A-15D depict and exemplary printed magnetic structure comprises alternating polarity spaced maxel stripes.

FIG. 16A depicts an oblique view of an exemplary prior art Halbach array.

FIG. 16B depicts a top down view of the same exemplary Halbach array of FIG. 16A.

FIGS. 17A and 17B depict side and oblique views of an exemplary hybrid magnet-pole piece structure in accordance with one aspect of the invention.

FIG. 17C depicts a target on top of the exemplary hybrid magnet-pole piece structure of FIGS. 17A and 17B where flux lines are shown moving in a clockwise direction.

FIG. 17D depicts a target on bottom of the exemplary hybrid magnet-pole piece structure of FIGS. 17A and 17B where flux lines are shown moving in a counter-clockwise direction.

FIG. 17E depicts separated complementary three magnet-two pole piece arrays.

FIG. 17F depicts the complementary arrays of FIG. 17E in contact.

FIG. 17G depicts an exemplary lateral magnet hybrid structure.

FIG. 17H depicts the exemplary lateral magnet hybrid structure of FIG. 17G with a target attached on a first side such that flux lines move in a clockwise manner.

FIG. 17I depicts the exemplary lateral magnet hybrid structure of FIG. 17G with a target attached on a second side such that flux lines move in a counter-clockwise manner.

FIG. 17J depicts separated complementary lateral magnet hybrid structures like depicted in FIG. 17G.

FIG. 17K depicts complementary lateral magnet hybrid structures like depicted in FIG. 17G in contact.

FIGS. 18A and 18B depict a prior art magnet structure where the magnets in the four corners are magnetized vertically and the side magnets between the corner magnets are magnetized horizontally.

FIGS. 19A and 19B depict a four magnet-four pole piece hybrid structure.

FIGS. 19C and 19D depict magnetic circuits produced by placing a target on the top and on the bottom of hybrid structures of FIGS. 19A and 19B.

FIGS. 19L and 19M depict lateral magnet hybrid structures that are similar to the hybrid structures of FIGS. 19A and 19B.

FIG. 19E depicts a twelve magnet-four pole piece hybrid structure that corresponds to a two-dimensional version of hybrid structure of FIGS. 17A-17F.

FIG. 19F depicts a twelve lateral magnet-four pole piece hybrid structure that corresponds to a two-dimensional version of the lateral magnet hybrid structure of FIGS. 17G-17K.

FIG. 19G depicts use of beveled magnets in a hybrid structure similar to the hybrid structure of FIG. 19E.

FIG. 19H depicts use of different sized magnets in one dimension versus another dimension in a hybrid structure similar to the hybrid structures of FIGS. 19E and 19G.

FIGS. 19I-19K depict movement of the rows of magnets versus the pole pieces and vertical magnets so as to control the flux that is available at the ends of the pole pieces.

FIG. 20 depicts a prior art magnetic structure that directs flux to the top of the structure.

FIGS. 21A and 21B depict a hybrid structure and a lateral magnet hybrid structure each having a pole piece surrounded by eight magnets in the same magnet pattern as the magnetic structure of FIG. 20.

FIG. 22A depicts an exemplary hybrid rotor in accordance with the invention.

FIG. 22B provides an enlarged segment of the rotor of FIG. 22A.

FIGS. 22C and 22D depict exemplary stator coils.

FIG. 22E depicts a first exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement.

FIG. 22F depicts a second exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement

FIG. 22G depicts a third exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement.

FIG. 22H depicts a fourth exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement.

FIG. 22I depicts an exemplary saddle core type stator-rotor interface.

FIG. 22J depicts a fifth exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement.

FIG. 23A-C depict various views of an exemplary metal separator lateral magnet hybrid structure.

FIGS. 24A and 24C depict assemblies having magnets arranged in accordance with complementary cyclic Barker 4 codes.

FIGS. 25A and 25B depict cyclic lateral magnet assemblies similar to those of FIGS. 24A-24C except lateral magnets are combined with conventional magnets.

FIGS. 26A and 26B depict exemplary cyclic lateral magnet assemblies similar to those of FIGS. 25A and 25B where the individual conventional magnets are each replaced with four conventional magnets having polarities in accordance with a cyclic Barker 4 code.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention will now be described more fully in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention should not, however, be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, they are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.

Certain described embodiments may relate, by way of example but not limitation, to systems and/or apparatuses comprising magnetic structures, magnetic and non-magnetic materials, methods for using magnetic structures, magnetic structures having magnetic elements produced via magnetic printing, magnetic structures comprising arrays of discrete magnetic elements, combinations thereof, and so forth. Example realizations for such embodiments may be facilitated, at least in part, by the use of an emerging, revolutionary technology that may be termed correlated magnetics. This revolutionary technology referred to herein as correlated magnetics was first fully described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,800,471 issued on Sep. 21, 2010, and entitled “A Field Emission System and Method”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated herein by reference. A second generation of a correlated magnetic technology is described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,868,721 issued on Jan. 11, 2011, and entitled “A Field Emission System and Method”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated herein by reference. A third generation of a correlated magnetic technology is described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,219 issued on May 15, 2012, and entitled “A Field Emission System and Method”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated herein by reference. Another technology known as correlated inductance, which is related to correlated magnetics, has been described and enabled in the co-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 8,115,581 issued on Feb. 14, 2012, and entitled “A System and Method for Producing an Electric Pulse”. The contents of this document are hereby incorporated by reference.

Material presented herein may relate to and/or be implemented in conjunction with multilevel correlated magnetic systems and methods for producing a multilevel correlated magnetic system such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,568 issued Jul. 19, 2011 which is all incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Material presented herein may relate to and/or be implemented in conjunction with energy generation systems and methods such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,222,986 issued on Jul. 17, 2012, which is all incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Such systems and methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,681,256 issued Mar. 23, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,750,781 issued Jul. 6, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,755,462 issued Jul. 13, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,812,698 issued Oct. 12, 2010, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,817,002, 7,817,003, 7,817,004, 7,817,005, and 7,817,006 issued Oct. 19, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,821,367 issued Oct. 26, 2010, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,823,300 and 7,824,083 issued Nov. 2, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,834,729 issued Nov. 16, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,839,247 issued Nov. 23, 2010, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,843,295, 7,843,296, and 7,843,297 issued Nov. 30, 2010, U.S. Pat. No. 7,893,803 issued Feb. 22, 2011, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,956,711 and 7,956,712 issued Jun. 7, 2011, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,958,575, 7,961,068 and 7,961,069 issued Jun. 14, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,963,818 issued Jun. 21, 2011, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,015,752 and 8,016,330 issued Sep. 13, 2011, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,035,260 issued Oct. 11, 2011 are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

Material presented herein may relate to and/or be implemented in conjunction with systems and methods described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/640,979, filed May 1, 2012 titled “System for Detaching a Magnetic Structure from a Ferromagnetic Material”, which is incorporated herein by reference. Material may also relate to systems and methods described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/796,253, filed Nov. 5, 2012 titled “System for Controlling Magnetic Flux of a Multi-pole Magnetic Structure”, which is incorporated herein by reference. Material may also relate to systems and methods described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/735,460 filed Dec. 10, 2012 titled “An Intelligent Magnetic System”, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The present invention relates to a system for concentrating magnetic flux of a multi-pole magnetic structure having rectangular or striped polarity regions having either a positive or negative polarity that are separated by non-magnetic regions, where the polarity regions may have an alternating polarity pattern or have a polarity pattern in accordance with a code, where herein an alternating polarity pattern corresponds to polarity regions having substantially the same size such that produced magnetic fields alternate in polarity substantially uniformly. In contrast, a coded polarity pattern may comprise adjacent regions having the same polarity (e.g., two North polarity stripes separated by a non-magnetized region) and adjacent regions having opposite polarity or may comprise alternating polarity regions that have different sizes (e.g., a North polarity region of width 2X next to a South polarity region of width X). As described in patents referenced above, coded magnetic structures have at least three code elements and produce peak forces when aligned with a complementary coded magnetic structure but have forces that substantially cancel when such structures are misaligned, whereas complementary (uniformly) alternating polarity magnetic structures produce either all attract forces or all repel forces when their respective magnetic regions are in various alignments. Several examples of coded magnetic structures based on Barker 4 codes are provided herein but one skilled in the art will understand that other Barker codes and other types of codes can be employed such as those described in the patents referenced above.

In accordance with the invention, polarity regions can be separated magnets or can be printed magnetic regions on a single piece of magnetizable material. Such printed regions can be stripes made up of groups of printed maxels such as described in patents referenced above. Pole pieces are magnetically attached to the magnets or (maxel stripes) using a magnet-to-pole piece interface with a first area. The pole pieces can then be attached to a target such as a piece of ferromagnetic material or to complementary pole pieces using a pole piece-to-target interface that has a second area substantially smaller than the first area. As such, flux provided by the magnetic structure is routed into the pole piece via the magnet-to-pole interface and out of the pole piece using the pole piece-to-target interface, where the amount of flux concentration corresponds to the ratio of the first area divided by the second area.

Although the subject of this invention is the concentration of flux, the goal and methods are quite different than prior art. Prior art methods produce regions of flux concentration somewhere on a surface of magnetic material, where most of the area required to concentrate the flux has low flux density such that when it is taken into account the average flux density across the whole surface is only modestly higher, or may be even lower, than the density that can be achieved with the surface of an ordinary magnet. Thus the force density across the surface of the structure, or the achieved pounds per square inch (psi), is not improved. The primary object of this invention is to produce a surface that when taken as a whole achieves a substantial increase in total flux and therefore force density when in proximity to a ferromagnetic material or another magnet. This is achieved by integrating the flux across a magnetic surface at right angles to the working surface, and then conducting it to the working surface. In this regard, a maximum force density or maximum force produced over an area (e.g., psi) is achieved when the cross section of the pole pieces where they interface with the working surface of a target are just in saturation when in a closed magnetic circuit, where the maximum force density, is not achieved when the cross section of the pole pieces where they interface with the working surface of a target is over or under saturated. Furthermore, it is preferable that the magnetic material that sources the flux be as thin as possible but still provide magnetic flux at the flux saturation density of the magnetic material since a larger cross sectional area would act to dilute the force density since no flux emerges from its area. This ‘lateral magnet’ technique relies on the fact that the saturation flux density of known magnetic materials is substantially lower than the saturation flux density of materials such as low carbon steel or iron, where a saturation flux density corresponds to the maximum amount of flux that can be achieved for a given unit of area. Using this technique, force densities of four or more times the density of the strongest magnetic materials are possible. When inexpensive magnetic materials are used to supply the flux, the multiplication factor can be twenty or more permitting very strong magnetic structures to be constructed very inexpensively.

FIG. 1A depicts an exemplary magnet field 100 of a magnet 102, where the magnetic flux lines pass from the South (−) pole to the North (+) pole and then wrap around the magnet to the South pole in a symmetrical manner. When a rectangular pole piece 104 having sufficient ferromagnetic material to achieve saturation is placed onto one side of the magnet 102 as shown in FIG. 1B, the magnetic flux passing from the South pole to the North pole is redirected substantially perpendicular to the magnet 102 by the pole piece 104 such that it exits the top and bottom of the pole piece 104 and again wraps around to the South pole of the magnet 102. As shown the pole piece 104 contacts the magnet 102 using a magnet-to-pole piece interface 106 that is substantially larger than the area of the ends 108 of the pole piece 104 from which the magnetic flux is shown exiting the pole piece 104.

FIG. 1C depicts a magnet 102 having two such rectangularpole pieces 104, where there is a pole piece 104 on each side of the magnet 102. As shown the flux is shown being primarily above and below the magnet 102 such that it's attachment interface has been fully rotated 90°.

FIGS. 2A and 2B depict portions of exemplary magnetic fields 100 between two adjacent magnets 102 having an opposite polarity relationship, where each magnet 102 has a pole piece 104 on one side.

FIGS. 3A and 3B depict portions of exemplary magnetic fields 100 between two adjacent magnets 102 having an opposite polarity relationship, where each magnet 102 has pole pieces 104 on both sides of the magnet 102. Exemplary magnetic fields between the bottom of the pole pieces 104 and the magnets 102, and between the bottoms of the pole pieces 104 are not shown in FIG. 3A.

FIG. 4A depicts an exemplary magnetic structure 400 comprising two spaced magnets 102 having an opposite (or alternating) polarity relationship attached by a shunt plate 402 and attached to a target 404 such as a piece of iron.

FIG. 4B depicts an exemplary magnetic flux circuit created by the shunt plate 402 and the target 404 as indicated by the dotted oval shape. Note that the spacing between magnets 102 can be air or it can be any form of non-magnetic material such as plastic, Aluminum, or the like.

FIG. 4C depicts an exemplary magnetic structure 406 comprising four magnets 102 having an alternating polarity relationship having a shunt plate 402 and attached to a target 404 such that three magnetic flux circuits are created.

FIG. 4D depicts an oblique projection of the magnetic structure 406 of FIG. 4C approaching the target 404, where the target interface area 408 of each magnet 102 has an area equal to the magnet's height (h) multiplied by the magnet's width (d₁).

FIG. 5A depicts an exemplary flux concentrator device 500 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, which corresponds to the magnetic structure and shunt plate of FIG. 4C with four rectangularpole pieces 104 that each have magnet-to-pole piece interface 502 that interface fully with the target interface surfaces 408 of each of the four magnets 102 of the magnetic structure. The pole pieces 104 are each shown to have a pole piece-to-target interface 504 having an area equal to each pole piece's width (d1) to the pole piece's thickness (d2), where each pole piece width may be equal to the width of the magnet 102 to which it is attached. As such, the flux that is directed to the target 404 is concentrated from a first surface area (d1×h) of the magnet-to-pole piece interface 502 to the second surface area (d1×d2), of the pole piece-to-target interface 504 where the amount of flux concentration corresponds to the ratio of the two areas. Generally, a flux concentrator device 500 may include a magnetic structure comprising a plurality of discrete magnets separated by spacings or may include a printed magnetic structure with maxel stripes separated by spacings (i.e., non-magnetized regions or stripes) and pole pieces 104 that interface with the discrete magnets 102 or the maxel stripes. Maxel stripes are depicted in FIGS. 15A-15D. The pole pieces may extend at least the height of the magnet structure (or beyond) with the purpose of directing flux 90 degrees thereby achieving a greater (pounds force per square inch) psi at the top and/or bottom of the pole pieces 104 than can be achieved at the sides of the magnets 102 to which they are interfacing. Optional shunt plates 402 are shown on the sides of the magnets 102 opposite the pole pieces 104.

FIG. 5B depicts an exemplary magnetic flux circuit 506, where on one side of the magnets 102 the circuit is made using a shunt plate 402 and on the other side of the magnets 102 the circuit is made using two pole pieces 104 attached to a target 404 that spans the two pole pieces 102.

FIG. 5C depicts the exemplary flux concentrator device 500 of FIG. 5A that has been attached to a target 404 that spans the four pole pieces 104 of the device 500. As such, FIG. 5C depicts the three magnetic flux circuits resulting from the use of the shunt plate 402, the pole pieces 104, and the target 404 with the magnets 102.

FIG. 6A shows an exemplary flux concentrator device 500 similar to the device 500 of FIG. 5A except the pole pieces 104 extend both above and below the magnetic structure made up of magnets 102. In FIG. 6B, the pole pieces 104 are the full length of the magnets 102 making up the magnetic structure but do not otherwise extend above or below the magnetic structure. In FIG. 6C, the pole pieces 104 are shorter than the magnets 102 of the magnetic structure where it is intended that the target 404 (not shown) interface with both the magnets 102 and the pole pieces 104. Similarly, in FIG. 6D, the pole pieces 104 are configured to accept targets 404 bottom that interface with the magnets 102 and the pole pieces 104 at the top of the device pole pieces 104.

FIG. 6E depicts additional pole pieces 602 having been added to the upper portions of the magnets 102 in the device 500 of FIG. 6C in order to provide protection to the surfaces of the magnets 102.

FIGS. 7A-7E depict various exemplary flux concentrator devices 700 having pole pieces on both sides of the magnetic structures. FIG. 7A depicts a magnetic structure comprising four alternating polarity magnets 102, which could be four alternating polarity maxel stripes (i.e., a printed magnetic structure), sandwiched between pole pieces 104 that extend from the bottom of the magnets 102 and then slightly above the magnets 102. FIG. 7B depicts pole pieces 104 that extend both above and below the magnets 102. FIG. 7C depicts pole pieces 104 that are the same height and are attached flush with the magnets 102. FIG. 7D depict pole pieces 104 that are shorter than the magnets 102 for receiving a target 404 (not shown) having a corresponding shape (e.g., an elongated C or U shape) or two bar shaped targets 404. FIG. 7E depicts pole pieces 104 configured for receiving two targets 404 having a corresponding shape or four bar shaped targets 404.

FIG. 8A depicts an exemplary flux concentrating device 800 comprising three magnetic structures like those of FIG. 7A except the magnets 102 in the middle structure are each rotated 180° compared to the magnets 102 in the two outer most structures. Because the eight pole pieces 104 in the inside of the device 800 are receiving twice the flux as the eight pole pieces 104 on the outside of the device 800, those pole pieces on the outside are reduced by half such that their PSI is substantially the same as those inside the device 800. FIG. 8B depicts an exemplary flux concentrating device 800 like that of FIG. 8A except the pole pieces 104 in the inside of the device are configured to accept targets 404 (not shown) that recess into the device 800. Such recessing into the device 800 provides a male-female type connection that can provide mechanical strength in addition to magnetic forces.

The concept of male-female type interfaces is further depicted in FIGS. 9A-9G where various shapes are shown, where one skilled in the art will recognize that all sorts of interfaces are possible other than flat interfaces between pole pieces 104 of flux concentrator devices 500/700/800 and targets 404, which may be pole pieces 104 of another flux concentrator device 500/700/800.

FIG. 10A depicts an exemplary flux concentrator device 1000 like that shown previously in FIG. 5A, where the magnetic structure comprises four spaced magnets 102 (or maxel stripes) having a polarity pattern in accordance with a Barker 4 code. FIG. 10B depicts another exemplary flux concentrator device 1000 like that of FIG. 10A, where the magnets 102 of the magnetic structure have a polarity pattern that is complementary to the magnets 102 of the magnetic structure of FIG. 10A. As such, either of the flux concentrator devices 800 of FIGS. 10A and 10B can be turned upside down where the pole pieces 104 of one of the flux concentrator devices 800 is attached to the pole pieces 104 of the other flux concentrator device 800 in accordance with the Barker 4 correlation function.

FIGS. 11A and 11B depict complementary Barker-4 coded flux concentrator devices 1100 that like those of FIGS. 10A and 10B that can be turned upside down and aligned with the other device 1100 so as to produce a peak attractive force. It should be noted that if either structure is placed on top of a duplicate of itself that a peak repel force can be produced, which is effectively inverting the correlation function of the Barker 4 code.

FIG. 12 depicts four Barker-4 coded flux concentrator devices 1000 oriented in an array where they are spaced apart that produce a Barker-4 by Barker-4 coded composite flux concentrator device 1200.

FIGS. 13A and 13B depict two variations of self-complementary Barker4-2 coded flux concentrator devices 1300, where each device can be placed on top of a duplicate device 1300 and aligned to produce a peak attract force and where the devices will align in the direction perpendicular to the code because each Barker-4 code element is represented by a ‘+−’ or ‘−+’ symbol implemented perpendicular to the code.

FIG. 14 depicts exemplary tapered pole pieces 104. In FIG. 14 the pole pieces 104 are tapered such that they are thinner at the bottom of the magnets 102 and grow thicker and thicker towards the pole piece-to-target interface 504. By tapering the pole pieces 104, there can be less flux leakage between adjacent pole pieces 104.

FIGS. 15A and 15B depict and exemplary printed magnetic structure 1500 that comprises alternating polarity spaced maxel stripes 15021504, where each of the overlapping circles represents a printed positive polarity maxel 1506 or negative polarity maxel 1508. FIGS. 15C and 15D depicts an exemplary printed magnetic structure 1510 comprising spaced maxel stripes 15021504 having a polarity pattern in accordance with a Barker 4 pattern.

In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a magnetic structure is moveable relative to one or more pole pieces enabling force at a pole piece-to-target interface to be turned on, turned off, or controlled between some minimum and maximum value. One skilled in the art will recognize that the magnetic structure may be tilted relative to pole pieces or may be moved such that the pole pieces span between opposite polarity magnets (or stripes) so as to substantially prevent the magnetic flux from being provided to the pole piece-to-target interface. Systems and methods for moving pole pieces relative to a magnetic structure are described in patent filings previously referenced.

FIG. 16A depicts an oblique view of an exemplary prior art Halbach array 1600 constructed of five discreet magnets 102 having magnetization directions in accordance with the directions of the arrows, where X represents the back end (or tail) of an arrow and the circle with a dot in the middle represents the front end (or tip) of an arrow. Such an array causes the magnetic flux to be concentrated beneath the structure as shown. FIG. 16B depicts a top down view of the same exemplary Halbach array 1600 of FIG. 16A.

FIGS. 17A and 17B depict side and oblique views of an exemplary hybrid magnet-pole piece structure 1700 in accordance with one aspect of the invention. The hybrid magnet-pole piece structure 1700 comprises three magnets 102 sandwiching two pole pieces 104, where the magnets 104 have a polarity arrangement like those of the first, third, and fifth magnets of the Halbach array 1600 of FIGS. 16A and 16B. The magnetic behavior however, is substantially different. With the Halbach array of magnets 102, the field is always concentrated on one side of the magnetic structure 1600. With the hybrid magnet-pole piece structure (or hybrid structure) 1700, when a target material 404 such as a ferromagnetic material is not present to complete a circuit between the two pole pieces 104, the opposite polarity fields emitted by the pole pieces are emitted on all sides of the poles substantially equally. But, when a target material 404 is placed on any of the four sides of the hybrid structure, a magnetic circuit is closed, where the direction of the fields through the pole pieces depends on which side the target 404 is placed. For example, in FIG. 17C the flux lines are shown moving in a clockwise direction, whereas in FIG. 17D the flux lines are shown moving in a clockwise direction, where the flux through the magnet 102 and target 404 is the same in both instances but the flux direction through the poles 104 is reversed. Similarly, the targets could be placed on the front or back of the hybrid structure 1700 and the flux lines going through the pole pieces 104 would rotate plus or minus ninety degrees.

Similarly, as shown in FIGS. 17J and 17K, two complementary hybrid structures 1700 can be near each other but separated and they will not substantially react magnetically until the pole pieces 104 of the hybrid structures 1700 are substantially close or they come in contact at which time a circuit is completed between them and the flux is concentrated at the ends of the contacting pole pieces 104.

FIG. 17G depicts a lateral magnet hybrid structure 1702 where without a target 404 the fields emitted at the ends of the poles pieces 104 are substantially the same and are not concentrated. Like with the hybrid structure 1700 shown in FIGS. 17A-17D, the flux direction through the pole pieces 104 depends on which ends of the pole pieces 104 that the target 404 is placed. In FIG. 17H, the flux is shown moving in a clockwise manner but in FIG. 17I, the flux is shown moving in a counter-clockwise direction.

Similarly, as shown in FIGS. 17J and 17K, two complementary lateral magnet hybrid structures 1702 can be near each other but separated and they will not substantially react magnetically until the pole pieces 104 of the hybrid structures 1702 are substantially close or they come in contact at which time a circuit is completed between them and the flux is concentrated at the ends of the contacting pole pieces 104.

FIGS. 18A and 18B depict a prior art magnet structure 1800 where the magnets in the four corners are magnetized vertically and the side magnets between the corner magnets are magnetized horizontally. The side magnets are oriented such that flux moves towards the corner magnets where the flux is moving downwards and away from the corner magnets where the flux is moving upwards. The resulting effect is that flux is always concentrated beneath the structure.

FIGS. 19A and 19B depict a four magnet-four pole piece hybrid structure 1900 similar to the magnetic structures 1800 of FIGS. 18A and 18B where the corner magnets 102 are replaced with pole pieces 104. In a manner similar to the hybrid structures 1700 of FIGS. 17A and 17B, when a target material 404 such as a ferromagnetic material is not present to complete a circuit between any two pole pieces 104 of adjacent corners, the pole pieces 104 of the hybrid structure 1900 of FIGS. 19A and 19B will emit opposite polarity fields on all sides of the poles substantially equally. However, when a target 404 is placed on top of the hybrid structure 1900, magnetic circuits are produced between poles 104 of adjacent corners where the direction of the flux passing through the poles 104 depends on where the target 404 is placed. As shown, the flux changes direction through the pole pieces 104 when the target 404 is moved from the top of the hybrid structure 1900, as depicted in FIG. 19C, to the bottom of the hybrid structure 1900, as depicted in FIG. 19D.

FIGS. 19L and 19M depict lateral magnet hybrid structures 1902 that are similar to the hybrid structures 1900 of FIGS. 19A and 19B.

FIG. 19E depicts a twelve magnet-four pole piece hybrid structure 1904 that corresponds to a two-dimensional version of the hybrid structure 1700 of FIGS. 17A-17F.

FIG. 19F depicts a twelve lateral magnet-four pole piece hybrid structure 1906 that corresponds to a two-dimensional version of the lateral magnet hybrid structure 1702 of FIGS. 17G-17K.

FIG. 19G depicts use of beveled magnets 102 in a hybrid structure 1908 similar to the hybrid structure 1904 of FIG. 19E.

FIG. 19H depicts use of different sized magnets 102 in one dimension versus another dimension in a hybrid structure 1910 similar to the hybrid structures 19041908 of FIGS. 19E and 19G.

FIGS. 19I-19K depict movement of the rows of magnets versus the pole pieces 104 and vertical magnets 102 so as to control the flux that is available at the ends of the pole pieces 104.

FIG. 20 depicts a prior art magnetic structure that directs flux to the top of the structure.

FIGS. 21A and 21B depict a hybrid structure and a lateral magnet hybrid structure each having a pole piece surrounded by eight magnets in the same magnet pattern as the magnetic structure of FIG. 20, where the direction of the flux through the pole piece will depend on which end a target is placed.

FIG. 22A depicts an exemplary hybrid rotor 2200 in accordance with the invention where lateral magnets 102 on either side of pole pieces 104 alternate such that their magnetization is as depicted with the arrows shown. FIG. 22B provides an enlarged segment 2202 of the rotor 2200. Stator coils 2204 having cores 2206 such as depicted in FIGS. 22C and 22D would be placed on a corresponding stator (not shown), where there could be a one-to-one relationship between the number of stator coils 2204 and pole pieces 104 on a rotor 2200 or there could be less stator coils 2204 by some desired ratio of stator coils 2204 to pole pieces 104. The pole pieces 104 and the cores 2206 of each stator coil 2204 are configured such that flux from the pole piece 104 can traverse a small gap between a given pole piece 104 and a given core 2206 of a given stator coil 2204. One skilled in the art will recognize that this arrangement corresponds to a pole piece 104 to stator coil 2204 interface that can be used to enable motors, generators, actuators, and the like based on the use of lateral magnet arrangements.

FIG. 22E depicts an exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement 2210 where the cores 2206 of paired stator coils 2204 have shunts plates 402 that join the cores 2206.

FIG. 22F depicts an exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement 2212 where the cores 2206 of paired stator coils 2204 are all joined by a single shunt plate 402.

FIG. 22G depicts an exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement 2214 where two stator coils 2204 are used with one rotor where the cores 2206 of the paired stator coils 2204 have shunts plates 402 that join the cores 2206. One skilled in the art will understand that when flux from the lateral magnets 102 is being routed to both ends of the pole pieces 104, the material making up the pole pieces 104 can be made thinner.

FIG. 22H depicts an exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement 2216 where two stator coils 2204 are used with one rotor 2200 where the cores 2206 of the paired stator coils 2204 are all joined by a single shunt plate 402.

FIG. 22I depicts an exemplary saddle core type stator-rotor interface 2220 where core material 2206 wraps around from one side of the pole piece 104 to the other side providing a complete circuit. A coil 2204 can be placed around the core material 2206 anywhere along the core material 2206 to include the entire core material 2206. This saddle core arrangement is similar to that described in U.S. Non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/236,413, filed Sep. 19, 2011, titled “An Electromagnetic Structure Having A Core Element That Extends Magnetic Coupling Around Opposing Surfaces Of A Circular Magnetic Structure”, which is incorporated by reference herein.

FIG. 22J depicts an exemplary hybrid rotor and stator coil arrangement 2222 involving two rotors 2200 that are either side of a stator coil array where the opposing pole pieces of the two rotors have opposite polarities.

FIG. 23A depicts an exemplary metal separator lateral magnet hybrid structure 2300 comprising long pole pieces 104 sandwiched between magnets 1021 having magnetizations as shown in FIG. 23B. A target 404 placed on top can be used to separate metal from material striking it. Under one arrangement the pole pieces 104 and the target would be shaped to provide a rounded upper surface.

Cyclic lateral magnet assemblies can be arranged to correspond to cyclic codes. FIGS. 24A and 24B depict assemblies 2400 having magnetic structures made up of magnets arranged in accordance with complementary cyclic Barker 4 codes. As shown in FIG. 24C, the two complementary cyclic lateral magnet assemblies 2400 can be brought together such that their magnetic structures correlate. Either assembly 2400 can then be turned to de-correlate the magnetic structures. A sleeve 2404 is shown that can be used to constrain the relative movement of the two assemblies 2400 relative to each other to rotational movement while allowing the two assemblies 2400 to be brought together or pulled apart.

FIGS. 25A and 25B depict cyclic lateral magnet assemblies 2500 similar to those of FIGS. 24A-24C except lateral magnets around the perimeter 102a/104 are combined with conventional magnets 102b in the center. As such, when the complementary lateral magnet assemblies 2500 begin to approach each other, the opposite polarity magnets 102b in the center of the assemblies 2500, which will have a farther reach than the lateral magnets 102a/104, begin to attract each other so to bring the two assemblies 2500 together and, once together, either lateral magnet assembly 2500 can be rotated relative to the other to achieve a correlated peak attract force position. One skilled in the art will recognize that for the cyclic Barker 4 code also requires physical constraint of the two assemblies 2500 so that they can only rotate relative to each other such that the two ends of the assemblies 2500 are always fully facing each other. Various types of mechanisms can be employed such as an outer cylinder or sleeve 2404 that would provide for a male-female connector type attachment.

FIGS. 26A and 26B depict exemplary cyclic lateral magnet assemblies 2600 similar to those of FIGS. 25A and 25B where the individual conventional magnets 102b are each replaced with four conventional magnets 102b having polarities in accordance with a cyclic Barker 4 code. Whereas the conventional magnets 102b of FIGS. 25A and 25B would provide an attract force regardless of rotational alignment, the conventional magnets 102b of FIGS. 26A and 26B have a correlation function where there is a peak attract force and substantially zero off peak forces.

Lateral magnet assemblies as described herein can be used for attachment of any two objects such as electronics devices to walls or vehicle dashes. In particular, anywhere that there is room for a magnet to recess into an object the present invention enables a small external attachment point to be provided. One such application could involve a screw-like lateral magnet device that would screw into a sheet rock wall and provide a very strong attachment point for metal or for a complementary lateral magnet device associated with another object (e.g., a picture frame).

Moreover, a coded magnetic structure comprising conventional magnets or which is a piece of magnet material having had maxels printed onto it can also interact with lateral magnet structures to included complementary coded magnetic and lateral magnet structures.

While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood, however, that the invention is not limited thereto, since modifications may be made by those skilled in the art, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.

Claims

1. A system for concentrating magnetic flux, comprising: a multi-pole magnetic structure comprising one or more pieces of a magnetizable material having a plurality of polarity regions for providing a magnetic flux, said magnetizable material having a first saturation flux density, said plurality of polarity regions being magnetized in a plurality of magnetization directions; anda plurality of pole pieces of a ferromagnetic material for integrating said magnetic flux across said plurality of polarity regions and directing said magnetic flux at right angles to at least one target, said ferromagnetic material having a second saturation flux density, each pole piece of said plurality of pole pieces having a magnet-to-pole piece interface with a corresponding polarity region and a pole piece-to-target interface with said at least one target, and having an amount of said ferromagnetic material sufficient to achieve said second saturation flux density at the pole piece-to-target interface when in a closed magnetic circuit, said magnet-to-pole piece interface having a first area, said pole piece-to-target interface having a second area, said magnetic flux being routed into said pole piece via said magnet-to-pole interface and out of said pole piece via said pole piece-to-target interface, said routing of said magnetic flux through said pole piece resulting in an amount of concentration of said magnetic flux at said pole piece-to-target interface corresponding to the ratio of the first area divided by the second area, said amount of concentration of said magnetic flux corresponding to a maximum force density.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein said polarity regions are separate magnets.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein said polarity regions have a substantially uniformly alternating polarity pattern.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein said polarity regions have a polarity pattern in accordance with a code having a code length greater than 2.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein said code is a Barker code.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein said polarity regions are printed magnetic regions on a single piece of magnetizable material.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein said printed magnetic regions are separated by non-magnetized regions.

8. The system of claim 6, wherein said printed magnetic regions are stripes.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein said stripes are groups of printed maxels.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein said target is a ferromagnetic material.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein said target is a complementary pole piece.

12. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a shunt plate for producing a magnetic flux circuit between at least two polarity regions of said plurality of polarity regions.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein each of said plurality of polarity regions has one of a first magnetization direction or a second magnetization direction that is opposite to said first magnetization direction.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein each of said plurality of polarity regions has one of a first magnetization direction, a second magnetization direction that is opposite to said first magnetization direction, a third magnetization direction that is perpendicular to said first magnetization direction, or a fourth magnetization direction that is opposite to said third magnetization direction.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein a thickness of said one or more pieces of magnetizable material is sufficient to just provide said magnetic flux having said first flux density at said magnet-to-pole interface as required to achieve said maximum force density at said pole piece-to-target interface.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein a length of at least one pole piece of said plurality of pole pieces is substantially equal to a length of at least one polarity region of said plurality of polarity regions.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein a length of at least one pole piece of said plurality of pole pieces is less than a length of at least one polarity region of said plurality of polarity regions.

18. The system of claim 1, wherein a length of at least one pole piece of said plurality of pole pieces is greater than a length of at least one polarity region of said plurality of polarity regions.

19. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one pole piece of said plurality of pole pieces and said at least one target have a male-female type interface.

20. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one pole piece of said plurality of pole pieces is tapered.