System for consolidating powders

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6612826
  • Patent Number
    6,612,826
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 15, 1997
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 2, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
This invention relates to a system and method for consolidating particulate material, such as particulate material, in order to achieve at least ninety-five percent (95%) or even ninety-eight percent (98%) of its maximum theoretical density using a relatively long duration, relatively low current density current flow through the material. In one embodiment, the consolidation system includes a feedback control for monitoring various characteristics associated with the particulate material being consolidated and providing feedback information to a power supply which controls the amount of current supplied to the particulate material in order to achieve the desired density. The consolidation system and method is characterized in that the duration of the current is greater than 0.1 second, but typically less than about 1 second, while the current is less than about 10KA/cm2.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to a method and apparatus for consolidating particulate material, such as powders, and more particularly, to a system and method for consolidating particulate material by applying relatively long duration current flow at relatively low current densities to the particulate material in order to achieve densities in excess of ninety percent (90%) of the theoretical maximum density for the particulate material.




2. Description of Related Art




The consolidation of particulate material under relatively high compaction pressure using molds and dies to manufacture parts has become a frequently used industrial process. One of the major limitations of the powder material compaction process is that, with most materials, less than full densification is achieved during the compaction process. Typically, powder material consolidation results in less than ninety-three percent (93%) of its full theoretical density for many powders and for difficult to compact materials (such as stainless steel) less than eighty-five percent (85%) of theoretical density is achieved. Less than full density, results in degraded material properties, such as strength, stiffness, magnetisity and the like. High density is required to enable particulate material consolidation to make higher performance parts, such as gears, for example, for use in automobiles because high strength is often required.




U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,929,415; 4,975,412; 5,084,088; 5,529,746; 5,380,473 are examples of consolidation techniques of the type used in the past. For example, Okazaki discloses a method for sintering and forming powder. This method uses a high voltage of 3 KV or more which is applied to a mold filled with the powder using an electrode which maintains a high current of 50 KAcm


−2


or greater for a period of time from 10 to 500 microseconds.




Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,412 also discloses a method of processing superconducting materials which utilizes, again, a high voltage and current density to provide sharp bonding between or among the particulate material.




Still another example is U.S. Pat. No. 5,529,746 issued to Knoss which discloses processing the powders using one to three electric current pulses from 5×10


−5


to 5×10


−2


second duration and high electric power applied to the punches of the press.




Thus, the typical technique for consolidating the particulate material is to use a relatively high current pulse of fairly short duration to cause consolidation of the powder. A problem with this approach has been, that under these conditions electrical arcing may occur at the interface between the powder and the current-conducting punches. This arcing will severely limit the useful life of the punches and, therefore, must be overcome in order to make this technique commercially viable.




Still another problem of the prior art is that the walls of the molds or dies used during the consolidation process required an insulator, such as ceramic. One significant problem with this approach is that the ceramic used for insulating the walls were not suitable for generating parts having shapes which require intricate details because when the intricate details are machined into the ceramic insulators and the insulators in the die, the ceramic would sometimes crack or chip upon use during the consolidation process.




Another problem with prior art techniques is that they did not permit tailoring of the power input to the powder mass to allow controlled power input. This resulted in inconsistent densification of parts manufactured using the consolidation process.




What is needed, therefore, is a system and method for consolidating powders which will avoid the problems encountered by the techniques used in the past.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is, therefore, a primary object to provide a system and method for using relatively long duration, relatively low current density, proximately constant voltage electrical current flow through the particulate material during the consolidation process.




Another object of the invention is to provide a system and method for consolidating particulate material using relatively long duration, relatively low current density in a manner that will permit achievement of ninety-eight percent (98%) or greater of the material's theoretical density, even when used with materials which traditionally have been very difficult to consolidate, such as stainless steel, Sendust, 4405 and the like.




Another object of the invention is to provide a system and method for avoiding undesired arcing at the interface between the punch and particulate material, thereby improving the useful life of the punches.




Another object of the invention is to provide a consolidation system and method which may utilize either a DC voltage source or a near constant AC voltage source while the current density is kept below about 10 KA/cm


2


and the duration of the current discharge maintained longer than 0.1 second, depending on the powder being consolidated.




Still another object of the invention is to provide a consolidation system and method which realizes only modest temperature rises in the powder during the consolidation process.




Yet another object of the invention is to provide a consolidation system and method which utilizes active feedback control of the power input during the consolidation process, thereby permitting tailoring of the power input to the particulate material being consolidated.




Still another object of the invention is to provide an active feedback control for controlling the power input which facilitates realizing controlled densification.




Yet another object of the invention is to provide a system and method for providing a non-ceramic insulator which facilitates developing intricate molds or dies which have not been realized in the past so that intricate details, such as gear teeth on an outer periphery of a gear may be easily manufactured.




In one aspect, this invention comprises a powder consolidation system comprising a powder die for receiving a powder to be consolidated, a first punch and a second punch which cooperate with the powder die to compress the powder, a power source coupled to the first and second punches to energize the powder to a predetermined energy level when the powder is being consolidated, and a feedback control coupled to the punches and the power source for monitoring a characteristic of the powder when it is being consolidated and generating a feedback signal in response thereto, the power source adjusting the predetermined energy level in response to the feedback signal while the powder is being consolidated such that the powder achieves at least ninety-eight percent (98%) of its maximum theoretical density.




In another aspect, this invention comprises a method for consolidating a powder comprising the steps of situating a powder in a powder die, compressing the powder in the powder die using a first punch and a second punch, energizing the powder to a predetermined energy level during the compressing step, monitoring a characteristic of the powder during the compressing step and generating a feedback signal in response thereto, and adjusting the predetermined energy level in response to the feedback signal during the compressing step.











Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the appended claims.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a sectional-schematic view of a system according to one embodiment of the invention, showing at least one punch in an open position;





FIG. 2

is a view of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, showing the punches in a generally closed position;





FIG. 3

is a sectional-schematic illustration of another embodiment of the invention showing a die liner coating used to line a die used in the consolidation process;





FIG. 4

is a sectional-schematic view illustrating another embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 5

is a sectional, plan view illustrating various components of the die arrangement illustrated in

FIG. 1

; and





FIG. 6

is a schematic view of a process or procedure according to an embodiment of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, a particulate material consolidation system


10


is shown comprising a die


12


for receiving a particulate material


14


, such as a powder. In the embodiment being described, the die


12


comprises a ceramic liner


16


and ceramic rod


18


which cooperate to define an aperture


20


for receiving the particulate material


14


. For ease of illustration, the die


12


and ceramic components


16


and


18


are shown to define a tubular aperture


20


for receiving particulate material which is consolidated to provide a tubular-shaped part after the consolidation process is complete in the manner described below.




As illustrated in

FIG. 5

, the die


12


comprises a steel die member


12




a


comprising the insulative liner


16


which, in the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, is a ceramic. liner. Notice in

FIG. 1

that an inner surface


16




a


of insulator


16


cooperates with an outer surface


18




a


of insulator


18


to define the aperture


20


which receives the particulate material


14


. It should be appreciated that while the embodiment shown and described herein illustrates the consolidation of a tubular part, the features of this invention may be used to consolidate many different types of parts having different shapes and dimensions. For example, it is envisioned that this consolidation system and method may be utilized to manufacture various industrial and automotive parts, such as gear members, compressor members, flanges, clamps, magnets, as well as other parts as may be desired.




The consolidation system


10


comprises a hydraulic press


22


which is coupled to and under the operation of a controller


24


, but it could be a mechanical, electrical or other suitable press as desired. The hydraulic press


22


comprises a hydraulic accumulator


22




a


for facilitating providing a substantially constant or linear hydraulic pressure during the consolidation process in coordination with electrical power flow. The press


22


comprises a sensor


22




b


coupled to controller


24


for sensing a hydraulic pressure. The press


22


comprises a plurality of punches


26


and


28


which cooperate such that their engaging ends


26




a


and


28




a


are received in aperture


20


and apply a consolidating or compressive force against particulate material


14


to produce the part (not shown).




In the embodiment being described, the controller


24


is a programmable logic controller (“PLC”) program to function in a manner described later herein. Controller


24


is also coupled to a power source


30


which, in turn, is coupled to punches


26


and


28


and which provide a predetermined energy level, under control of controller


24


, to said particulate material


14


in the manner described later herein.




The particulate material consolidation system


10


further comprises feedback control


32


or feedback control means for monitoring a characteristic of the particulate material


14


during the consolidation process and for generating feedback information, such as a feedback signal, in response thereto. In the embodiment being described, the feedback control


32


comprises a plurality of sensors, including a current sensor


34


which senses a current on line


36


between punch


26


and power supply


30


. The feedback control


32


further comprises a voltage sensor


38


situated between control


24


and punch


26


for sensing a voltage drop across particulate material


14


.




The feedback control


32


further comprises a punch position sensor


40


coupled to controller


24


which senses a position of the punch


26


relative to punch


28


and provides position information regarding when the punches


26


and


28


are in an open position (illustrated in

FIG. 1

) or a closed position (illustrated in FIG.


2


), as well as all positions in between.




In the embodiment being illustrated in

FIG. 1

, it should be appreciated that it may be desired to first actuate punch


28


into aperture


20


which seals or closes an end of the aperture


20


such that it can receive particulate material


14


before punch


26


is actuated into the closed position illustrated in FIG.


2


.




In the embodiment being described, feedback control


32


utilizes current sensor


34


to sense the current passing between punches


26


and


28


. Feedback control


32


also generates a punch position signal using punch sensor,


40


and a voltage signal using voltage sensor


38


. This sensed information is fed back to controller


24


which, in turn, is coupled to power supply


30


and which controls the amount of power supplied to punches


26


and


28


while the particulate material


14


is being consolidated. It has been found empirically that controlling the power supply has facilitated accommodating or tailoring the power supply


30


to the particular characteristics of the particulate material


14


being consolidated. The feedback control


32


also permits controlled power input which is coordinated with the actuation of punches


26


and


28


to achieve a particulate material density which is more uniform than techniques used in the past and which facilitates achieving at least ninety-five percent (95%) or even ninety-eight percent (98%) or greater of the maximum theoretical density for the particulate material


14


being consolidated.




The close-looped control system facilitates providing uniform part-to-part power delivery. In this regard, feedback control


32


uses sensor


40


to sense a punch position in die


12


so that when punches


26


and


28


are in die


12


, the controller


24


causes power source


30


to provide an initial predetermined energy level to punches


26


and


28


.




Controller


24


utilizes sensor


38


to measure a voltage across the particulate material


14


and current sensor


34


of feedback control


32


to provide a current measurement for the particulate material


14


.




Controller


24


continuously computes the energy supplied to the particulate material


14


during the consolidation process. When a predetermined energy level for particulate material is achieved (such as 150 kJ/kg for Fe), then controller


24


turns power supply


30


off and energizes press


22


to drive punches


26


and


28


to an open position (

FIG. 1

) where the consolidated part may be removed from die


12


.




It is envisioned that the PLC controller


24


may be programmed to cause the voltage and current supplied by power source


30


to vary. For example, controller


24


may use position sensor


40


to automatically initiate current flow, at the low levels described herein, just as punches


26


and


28


begin compressing or consolidating the particulate material


14


. Thereafter, controller


24


may cause power supply


30


to ramp up or increase voltage and current as pressure or particulate material


14


increases during advance of the punches


26


and


28


.




This power supply


30


ramp-up will offset the natural drop in resistance of the particulate material


14


and the drop in power delivered to the particulate material


14


when using a simple constant voltage course. Once again, measurement of the voltage drop across the particulate material


14


and the current through the particulate material


14


provides means for monitoring the power and energy delivered to the powder, so that the control system will cause a reliable-repeatable level of powder heating/consolidation.




It should also be appreciated that the feedback control


32


may control pressure supplied by the punches


26


and


28


or the punch


26


and


28


position to achieve the desired consolidation pressure throughout the electrical discharge.




A unique feature of the invention described herein is that it uses relatively long duration energization with low current densities which provides approximately constant voltage electrical current flow through the particulate material


14


as it is being consolidated. In the embodiment being described, the predetermined energy level comprises a duration of typically less than about one second and usually greater than or equal to about 0.1 seconds. Moreover, the power supply


30


provides a current density of less than about ten KA/cm


2


during the relatively long energizing period.




In the embodiment being described, the punches


26


and


28


comprise a punch resistivity of less than about 25×10


−8


Ohm-meter.




A method of operation of the particulate material consolidation system


10


shown in

FIG. 1

will now be described relative to

FIG. 6

where the procedure begins at block


42


by loading the particulate material


14


into aperture


20


. At block


44


, controller


24


energizes hydraulic press


22


to actuate punches


26


and


28


into the closed position (illustrated in

FIG. 2

) to consolidate or compress particulate material


14


. During the consolidation process, controller


24


energizes power supply


30


to provide current flow (block


46


in

FIG. 6

) to punches


26


and


28


which, in turn, energizes the compressed particulate material


24


. During this consolidation process, feedback control


32


monitors the current, voltage and punch position using sensors


34


,


38


and


40


, respectively, to provide feedback information to controller


24


(block


48


in

FIG. 6

) which, in turn, may adjust power supply


30


to alter or adjust the current supplied to punches


26


and


28


. Typically, adjustment is required to compensate for powder fill variations and temperature variations.




During consolidation, hydraulic accumulator


22




a


may apply additional pressure to stabilize or provide a substantially linear pressure to the particulate material


14


.




Once the consolidation process is complete, controller


24


energizes hydraulic press


22


to move punches


26


and


28


to the open position (illustrated in FIG.


1


and shown at block


50


in

FIG. 6

) such that the consolidated part (not shown) may be ejected (block


52


in FIG.


6


). Thereafter, the routine is complete, whereupon the procedure would proceed back to block


42


in order to produce another part.




Advantageously, this system and method provide means for densifying the particulate material to in excess of ninety-five percent (95%) or even ninety-eight percent (98%) of its theoretical maximum density using relatively low current density for relatively long periods. A plurality of tests were conducted and the following results are summarized in Tables I-III described later herein were realized. In this regard, the hydraulic press


22


comprised a one hundred ton hydraulic press which was fitted with the hydraulic accumulator


22




a


to provide additional hydraulic pressure during the application of current. The press was also integrated with a fifty (50) KA battery power supply


30


and the controller


24


mentioned earlier herein.




The current from the power supply


30


was applied to the punches


26


and


28


such that it passed through the particulate material


14


which is compacted to an initial pressure by punches


26


and


28


under influence of the hydraulic press


22


.




The current passing through the particulate material


14


during the consolidation process causes the particulate material


14


to be resistively heated causing it to become more compressible. The hydraulic accumulator


22




a


associated with hydraulic press


22


stores extra hydraulic fluid to allow follow up pressure to be applied to punches


26


and


28


to further consolidate or compress particulate material


14


therebetween.




The following tables I-III illustrate a few of the particulate materials that were consolidated by the method and a system of the present invention including pure iron (Fe); Fe-45P iron powder; and 410 SS powder. The tests were performed while hydraulic press


22


caused punches


26


and


28


to apply compaction pressures of 30, 40 and 50 tsi, while the power source


30


provided the current mentioned above for 0.5, 0.75 and one second for each sample. For stainless steel specimens, the times were lowered to less than 0.75 seconds in order to avoid excessive heating of punches


26


and


28


. The densities were measured at each compaction pressure level and current application time. Associated base line data was acquired by measuring the density of each specimen at each compaction pressure where no current was applied during the compaction.




The following tables I-III summarize the results for each of the particulate materials tested:












TABLE I











(Fe)





















Sample






Pulse




Bus




Punch





Actual




Theoretical







Mass





Load




Time




Volt




Voltage




Peak I




Density




Density






Sample No.




(g)




Material




(tsi)




(s)




(mv)




(volts)




(AMPS)




(g/cc)




(g/cc)









Baseline




38.293




Fe




30




0  







6.82




7.86 g/cc






1




37.404




Fe




30




0.5 




160




7.03




26446




7.16




7.86 g/cc






2




33.463




Fe




30




0.75




160




7.5 




26446




7.25




7.86 g/cc






3




33.66 




Fe




30




1  




160




7.67




26446




7.38




7.86 g/cc






Baseline




37.854




Fe




40




0  







7.12




7.86 g/cc






1




34.319




Fe




40




0.5 




152




7.09




25124




7.38




7.86 g/cc






2




34.222




Fe




40




0.75




152




7.19




25124




7.42




7.86 g/cc






3




31.364




Fe




40




1  




152




7.19




25124




7.63




7.86 g/cc






Baseline




37.503




Fe




50




0  







7.33




7.86 g/cc






1





Fe




50




0.5 




152




7.09




25124




7.55




7.86 g/cc






2




34.336




Fe




50




0.75




152




7.09




25124




7.58




7.86 g/cc






3




35.21 




Fe




50




1  




152




7.09




25124




7.61




7.86 g/cc






















TABLE II











Fe - 45P Powder













Material




Fe-45P







Punch R




1.80E − 04




ohm






Cp




450




J/kg-C






























Punch




Punch











Sample






Pulse




Samp




Bus




Voltage




Voltage










Mass





Load




Time




Temp




Volt




P1




P2




Peak I




Energy




dT






Test No.




(g)




Material




(tsi)




(s)




(F.)




(mv)




(V)




(V)




(AMPS)




(J)




(C)




Density









BASELINE




41.363




Fe-45P




30




0  











6.71






BAT838




40.075




Fe-45P




30




0.5 




387




152




8.24




6.92




25124




30120




1670




7.13






BAT839




38.455




Fe-45P




30




0.75




436




152




8.4 




7  




25124




46687




2698




7.3 






BAT840




38.906




Fe-45P




30




1  




371




144




8.24




6.68




23802




57022




3257




7.36






BASELINE




40.005




Fe-45P




40




0  











7.02






BAT841




40.074




Fe-45P




40




0.5 




206




144




8  




6.6 




23802




27559




1528




7.37






BAT842




37.945




Fe-45P




40




0.75




NA




144




8.04




6.48




23802




39196




2295




7.5 






BAT843




39.696




Fe-45P




40




1  




NA




144




8  




6.52




23802




53213




2979




7.52






BASELINE




39.859




Fe-45P




50




0  











7.22






BAT844




40.762




Fe-45P




50




0.5 




270




160




7.68




6.2 




26446




19037




1038




7.47






BAT845




40.148




Fe-45P




50




0.75




365




168




7.76




6.12




27769




23360




1293




7.59






BAT846




40.189




Fe-45P




50




1  




312




160




7.64




6  




26446




32785




1813




7.59






















TABLE III











410 SS Powder












Material




410 SS






Punch R




1.80E − 04




















Sample






Pulse




Samp




Bus









Mass





Load




Time




Temp




Volt




Peak I




Density






Test No.




(g)




Material




(tsi)




(s)




(F.)




(mv)




(AMPS)




(g/cc)









BASELINE




36.402




410 SS




30




0  







5.85






BAT850




34.344




410 SS




30




0.25




216




56




9256




5.93






BAT851




35.374




410 SS




30




0.5 




412




48




7934




7.26






BAT852




34.225




410 SS




30




0.75




550




56




9256




7.47








410 SS





1  




540




56




9256




7.59






BASELINE




34.941




410 SS




40




0  







6.19






BASELINE




33.709




410 SS




50




0  







6.49














Notice that densities near or in excess of ninety percent (90%) of the maximum theoretical density, which for iron Fe is 7.86 g/cc as defined in the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 68th ed.; WEAST, R. C., ED; CRC Press: Boca Roton, Fla., 1987, were achieved while applying very low current levels for relatively long periods of time (i.e., where the current was applied for a timed T, where 0.1≦T≦1 second).




For example, the actual density for Sample No. 3 (Table I) having a sample mass of 33.66 grams, 30 tsi, for a pulse time of 1 second, bus volt of 160, punch voltage of 7.67 with a peak amps of 26446 had an actual density of 7.38 g/cc. Comparing this to the theoretical density of 7.76 g/cc for Fe, it can be seen that the density is 97.58% (7.67÷7.86) which is in excess of 90%.




It should be appreciated that other current levels and durations may be used. For example, other, lower currents may be applied for longer duration, for example, depending on the material being consolidated.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, another embodiment of the invention is illustrated. In this embodiment parts which have similar or some functions as parts in

FIG. 1

have been identified with the same numerals as shown, except that a double prime label “″” has been added thereto. In this embodiment, notice the steel die container


12


″ comprises an insulative coating


54


″ which becomes integrally formed onto an interior surface or wall


12




a


″ of die


12


″. In the embodiment being described, the insulative coating


54


″ comprises a natural oxide and may be applied such that it comprises a thickness of about 6×10


−6


meter to 100×10


6


meter.




Advantageously, the insulative coating


54


″ facilitates eliminating the ceramic liner


16


(FIGS.


1


and


5


). The coating


54


″ also facilitates increasing the useful life of die


12


, as well as the manufacture of intricate parts which are difficult to consolidate using thick ceramic liners. Moreover, this system and method are simple and typically require tooling which is less expensive than approaches of the past.




The coating


54


″ may be applied by, for example, steam heat treatment or other oxide and phosphate coating techniques. For example, the coating


54


″ may comprise an oxide or a diamond film.





FIG. 4

illustrates still another embodiment of the invention showing another arrangement of the invention. Parts which have the same or similar function as the parts in

FIG. 1

are identified with the same part numbers with, except that a triple prime label (“′″”) has been added thereto.




In this embodiment, power supply


30


′″ applies current through die


12


′″. Note that this embodiment comprises a pair of punches


60


′″ and


62


′″ which define an aperture


64


′″ in which a conductive rod


66


′″ is situated. It should be appreciated that the punches


60


′″ and


62


′″ comprise an insulative lining


60




a


′″ and


62




a


′″ which insulates the conductive rod


66


′″ from the punches


60


′″ and


62


″′, respectively. In a manner similar to the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 1 and 3

, power supply


30


′″ applies the current through die


12


′″ which passes through the material


14


′″ to rod


66


′″ where it returns along lines


67




a


′″ and


67




b


″′, as shown in FIG.


4


. Similar to the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, the feedback control


32


′″ comprises a plurality of sensors


34


″′,


38


′″ and


40


′″ which are coupled as shown and which provide the feedback information mentioned earlier herein.




Advantageously, this embodiment facilitates providing a system and method for consolidating particulate materials


14


′″ using a radial current flow particularly in situations or configurations which require the use of sizable core rods. Such configurations may be encountered when making parts with central holes.




Advantageously, these embodiments illustrate means and apparatus for consolidating particulate material to achieve densities in excess of ninety-five percent (95%) or even ninety-eight percent (98%) of the theoretical density of the material being consolidated. In the embodiments being described and illustrated in Tables I-III, the inventors have been able to achieve densities in excess of ninety-five percent (95%) of theoretical densities by using electrical discharges of relatively long duration, but relatively low current densities.




While the methods herein described, and the forms of apparatus for carrying these methods into effect, constitute preferred embodiments of this invention, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these precise methods and forms of apparatus, and that changes may be made in either without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A particulate materials consolidation system comprising:a particulate material die for receiving a particulate material to be consolidated; a first punch and a second punch which cooperate with said particulate material die to compress the particulate material; a power source coupled to said first and second punches to energize said particulate material to a predetermined energy level for a duration of at least 0.1 second at a current of less than about 10 KA/cm2 when said particulate material is being consolidated; and a feedback control coupled to said punches and said power source for monitoring a characteristic of said particulate material when it is being consolidated and generating a feedback signal in response thereto; said power source adjusting said predetermined energy level in response to said feedback signal while said particulate material is being consolidated such that said particulate material achieves at least 95 percent of its maximum theoretical density.
  • 2. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 1 wherein said power source comprises a power supply which energizes said particulate material for a duration of less than 1 second.
  • 3. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 2 wherein said first and second punches comprise a punch resistivity of less than about 25×10−8 ohm-meter.
  • 4. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim e wherein said first and second punches comprise a punch resistivity of less than about 25×10−8 ohm-meter.
  • 5. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 1 wherein said particulate material die comprises a die surface having an insulator thereon.
  • 6. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 5 wherein said insulator is ceramic.
  • 7. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 5 wherein said insulator is a coating integral with said die surface.
  • 8. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 5 wherein said insulator is a coating comprises a thickness of less than about 6×10−6 meter to 100×10−6 meter.
  • 9. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 7 wherein said coating comprises an oxide or a diamond film.
  • 10. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 1 wherein said power source comprises a DC power source.
  • 11. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 1 wherein said power source comprises an AC power supply.
  • 12. The particulate material consolidation system as recited in claim 1 wherein said feedback control comprises a voltage sensor coupled to said first and second punches for measuring a voltage across said particulate material and for generating a voltage signal which defines said feedback signal.
US Referenced Citations (19)
Number Name Date Kind
2562876 Baeza Aug 1951 A
3069261 Kilby et al. Dec 1962 A
3143413 Krapf Aug 1964 A
3250892 Inoue May 1966 A
3508029 Inoue Apr 1970 A
3873805 Inoue Mar 1975 A
3883278 Hass May 1975 A
4062914 Hinzpeter Dec 1977 A
4929415 Okazaki May 1990 A
4989153 Bonvini Jan 1991 A
5084088 Okazaki Jan 1992 A
5394721 Iwayama et al. Mar 1995 A
5405574 Chelluri et al. Apr 1995 A
5529746 Knoss et al. Jun 1996 A
5547360 Yokoyama Aug 1996 A
5580586 Yokoyama Dec 1996 A
5611139 Chelluri et al. Mar 1997 A
5611230 Chelluri et al. Mar 1997 A
5689797 Chelluri et al. Nov 1997 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
08041507 Feb 1996 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
International Search Report completed Feb. 5, 1999 for International Application No. PCT/US98/21725.
“High-Energy, High-Rate Materials Processing”, H. L. Marcus et al., University of Texas at Austin, Journal of Metals, Dec. 1987.