The present invention relates generally to agricultural machinery for use with crop harvesting devices. It relates more particularly to a monitoring method and system for detecting bale wrapping errors.
For many years, agricultural balers have been used to consolidate and package crop material so as to facilitate the storage and handling of the crop material for later use. Usually, a mower-conditioner cuts and conditions the crop material for windrow drying in the sun. When the cut crop material is properly dried, a baler is pulled along the windrows to pick up the crop material and form it into densified packages, otherwise known as bales, which would be cylindrically-shaped round bales in the case of a round baler. More specifically, the pickup of the baler gathers the cut and windrowed crop material from the ground then conveys the cut crop material with a conveyor, such as a rotating conveying rotor into a bale-forming chamber within the baler. The pickup assembly has a drive mechanism that operates to power both the pickup and the conveying rotor, and the pickup drive mechanism is operably connected to and driven by the main drive mechanism of the baler. The baling chamber comprises a pair of opposing sidewalls with a series of belts that rotate and compress the crop material into a cylindrical shape. When the bale has achieved a desired size and density the operator wraps the bale to ensure that the bale maintains its shape and density. The operator raises the tailgate of the baler and ejects the bale onto the ground. The tailgate is then closed and the cycle repeated as necessary and desired to manage the field of cut crop material.
Common practice has the baler wrap the bales with twine, net-like or continuous plastic sheeting. With twine, the bale is wrapped back and forth from side-to-side as the bale is turned, from a single dispensing mechanism, or back and forth from middle-to-side from as the bale is turned, from dual dispensing mechanisms with twine numerous time, the twine “gripping” the crop material and prior wrappings of twine adequately to hold the package together in a process is often referred to as “tying” or “wrapping”. Net wrap is typically made of a woven plastic sheet, generally equal in width to the bale being formed, with regular openings there through and is over-lapped on itself to hold the package together. An adhesive may be used to improve the holding power of the net wrap. Plastic wrap, or film, is a generally continuous sheet of plastic, also generally the width of the bale being formed, with a somewhat adhesive surface that drips itself when overlapped and the crop material to form the package.
Once the bale is formed and tied or wrapped, it is ejected through the rear of the baler onto the field where it may sit until use, or may be collected into a central location for longer term storage. The tying and wrapping processes are subject to a number of failures or defaults. More particularly, the baler obviously carries a limited supply of packaging materials, so on occasion, the supplies run out and could result in the ejection of a bale that has been neither tied nor wrapped. Also, rips or tears do occur in the net wrap and plastic wrap materials, resulting in only partial coverage of the bale before ejection. Round bales are created under considerable pressure, so a tear or rip in the wrapping material is magnified with undesirable consequences in bale shape and rigidity.
In addition, the bale wrap or tie may become caught on a baler component such that the wrap or tie is wrapped onto the baler component instead of the bale. Without a method of detecting this error, an unwrapped or misshaped bale may be ejected from the bale chamber.
Practically, it is the operator's responsibility to look over his shoulder and try to monitor the progress of bale formation, its tying or wrapping, and its ejection all while driving the tractor. Not only is this a difficult responsibility to meet, it is impossible in some cases because many balers have components on the front thereof blocking a reasonable view of the bale.
What is needed is a baler that includes a system to detect bale forming and wrapping errors and to monitor bale forming and wrapping operations to avoid ejecting an improperly formed and/or wrapped bale from the baler.
The present disclosure is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems as set forth above.
The present disclosure relates to an agricultural baling system including a baler, and a bale monitoring system. The bale monitoring system includes an imaging system mounted on the baler for imaging a bale surface, and a warning device to indicate to an operator if a bale wrapped by the baler has been wrapped incorrectly.
The present disclosure relates to an agricultural baling system including a baler an a bale visual imaging system. The bale visual imaging system includes one or more imaging devices mounted on the baler for producing one or more visual image data sets of one or more surfaces of a bale. The bale visual imaging system further includes a control system configured to process the visual image data and to provide a bale status signal to an operator. The bale status signal is a bale wrap indication signal or a bale shape indication signal.
The present disclosure further relates to a bale imaging system including one or more imaging devices for producing one or more visual image data sets of one or more surfaces of a bale, and a control system configured to process the visual image data sets and to provide a bale status signal to an operator. The bale status signal is a bale wrap indication signal or a bale shape indication signal.
The present disclosure further related to a method of monitoring a baling operation including visually imaging a portion of a bale to produce visual image data of the bale, processing the visual image data to provide a bale status signal, and providing the bale status signal to an operator.
One advantage of the present disclosure is to provide a system and method for detecting a wrapping or tying error that results in an unwrapped or partially wrapped bale that provides a warning to the operator before ejecting the bale.
Another advantage of the present disclosure is to provide a system and method for detecting a bale shaping error that provides a warning to the operator before ejecting the bale.
Another advantage of the present disclosure is to provide a system and method that improves the efficiency of bale wrap operations.
Another advantage of the present disclosure is to provide a system and method for detecting bale wrapping or tying errors that can be retrofitted to an existing baler or part of a new bailer design.
Another advantage of the present disclosure is to verify the bale has completely ejected from the baler.
Another advantage of the present disclosure is to determine probable cause and/or location of a bale wrapping error.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
The present disclosure relates to a system and method for detecting a wrapping or tying error that results in an unwrapped or partially wrapped bale. The present disclosure further relates to a system and method of detecting a properly or improperly wrapped bale shape. The system and method provides information of the bale wrap tying and shaping operations to an operator before ejecting the bale.
Baler 20 includes a front section 20A, a top section 20B, a rear section 20C, and a bottom section 20D. Baler 20 further includes a bale forming mechanism 122 having a crop pickup 124 for moving a crop material from a field along and into a stuffer assembly 202 (not shown). The stuffer assembly 202 pushes the crop material into a bale chamber, which is a three-dimensional area between the side walls 126 and the changing volume generally within the bale-forming belts 128, a floor roll 202 and a starter roll 204, shown occupied by bale 212 (
Bale 130 is shown to be covered by a net wrap 132 that has been applied to the bale 130 by a net wrapping device 210 (
The bale monitoring system 100 includes a control system 102 and an imaging system 214 (
The control unit 104 controls operation of the bale monitoring system 100, including, but not limited to power to the bale monitoring system components, movement and control of the one or more imaging devices 218 (
The control unit 104 includes a display device 106 displays a visual image generated by the one or more imaging devices 218 (
The warning device 105 may provide a bale wrapping and/or shaping alarm to an operator to indicate if a bale has been wrapped and/or shaped correctly and/or incorrectly. The warning device 105 may be a visual or audible alarm device, such as, but not limited to, a light or audible alarm emitter. In another embodiment, the warning device 105 may be part of the control unit 104. In another embodiment, the warning device 105 may include one or more visual or/or audible alarm devices. In yet another embodiment, the warning device 105 may be mounted on the vehicle 10 and/or bailer 20. In this exemplary embodiment, the warning device 105 is dedicated to the bale wrapping alarm. In another embodiment, the warning device 105 may be integrated into a vehicle operations display/audible system of a vehicle operations system (not shown).
The control system 102 provides a bale status signal to the operator. The bale status signal may be one or more visual images of the bale surface and/or one or more error/pass signals indicating an improperly/properly wrapped bale and/or an improperly/properly shaped bale. The one or more visual images may be one or more still or video images of the bale surface.
In one embodiment, the control system 102 provides a visual image display of one or more surfaces of the bale 130 from visual image data provided by one or more imaging devices 218 (
In determining if the bale is wrapped correctly and/or if the bale is shaped correctly, the control system 102 may identify one or more target areas in the image (bale surface and circumferential profile for wrapping, and bale circumferential profile for bale shape). In an embodiment, the control system 102 may identifying the area of the image by an image identification technique such as, but not limited to pattern recognition, where the general shape of the object to be analyzed is known from a provided data base, and an acceptable image is searched for in the image database. In an embodiment where the position of the one or more imaging devices 218 is fixed, the target region of the image for analysis based on input data may be known. In an embodiment, information from a bale size sensor may be used to modify the target analysis area in the image as the bale grows.
The control system 102 may analyze the targeted area of the image for the bale wrap detection using techniques such as analysing the texture of the target area in the image, where texture may be defined as the determining the graininess of the images and grain size through analysis of colour and contrast. For the bale shape detection, the control system 102 may analyse the circumferential profile of the bale and compare it to a data base of circumferential profiles. An acceptable circumferential profile may be, over a small portion of the circumference, estimated as a ‘straight line’, the straight line being the target profile shape. Mapping of the ‘straight line’ based on information on the focal length of the camera would probably be required if the camera was using a lens other than 50 mm. In an embodiment, an imaging device 218 may be used, such as a camera with a wide angle lens such that the ‘straight line’ appears as a curve line in the generated image. The degree of curvature may be determined by how far the line is from the center of the image, and this degree of curvature may be used to determine if the bale has a proper or improper bale shape.
The control system 102 includes a computer program product including a computational logic and/or algorithm for calculating a proper and/or improper bale wrap and/or bale shape. The computational logic is embedded on a non-transitory computer readable medium and executable by a microprocessor 103. The microprocessor generates an bale wrap and/or shape analysis, which may be in the form of a transitory display to the operator.
In one embodiment, the microprocessor is a computer, central processing unit (CPU), or electronic circuit board capable of executing command functions. The computer may be a portable computer, such as, but not limited to, a laptop computer. The microprocessor may include input devices, such as, but not limited to USB ports, ethernet ports, and disk drives. In another embodiment, the input device may include a wireless system for receiving data input for the control system 108. The microprocessor may also include a keyboard or other manual data entry device to manually receive a data input or commands. The microprocessor 103 may include a memory module 107. The memory module may include an internal and/or external memory module. For example, the memory module may be RAM, ROM or other memory for receiving and storing coded programs for executing the method of the present disclosure. The microprocessor may be included in the control unit 104, imaging system 214, one or more imaging devices 218, a separate CPU or microprocessor, or any combination thereof.
The control system 102 processes the visual image data and provides a system status signal to the display device 106 and/or warning device 105. In an embodiment, the control system 102 may indicate if the bale is wrapped correctly and/or incorrectly and/or if the bale has a correct or incorrect shape. In an embodiment, the control system 102 may provide a system status signal to the display device 106 and/or warning device 105 to display a green and/or red light indicating a proper/improper bale wrap and/or shape.
In this embodiment, the imaging system 214 includes two imaging devices 218. In another embodiment, the imaging system 214 includes one or more imaging devices 218. Each imaging device 218 produces visual image data of the bale surface 216 and provides visual image data to the control system 102.
In this exemplary embodiment, the imaging device 218 is a photoelectric device, such as, but not limited to charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. In another embodiment, the imaging device 218 may be any electro-optical device capable of providing a digital data field representative of a visual image of the bale surface 216. As used and defined herein, the terms “visual image” means a pictorial image as perceived by the human eye, and “visual imaging” means producing a pictorial image as perceived by the human eye and composed of light of wavelengths in the visual spectrum. The imaging device 218 may capture the visual image in wavelengths above and below the visual light spectrum. In an embodiment, the imaging device 218 may capture the visual image in the infra-red spectrum. The visual image may be a still image and/or a continuous or live image. In an embodiment, the still image may be updated at a predetermined time interval.
The imaging devices 218 provides visual image data to the control system 102, which displays a real time image of the bale surface 216 to an operator. In an embodiment, a CCD camera may provide image data to a display device. In another embodiment, the visual image data produced by the imaging device 218 is also provided to the control system 102, where the visual image data is processed by an process algorithm to determine if the visual image of the bale surface 216 indicates if the bale has been properly or improperly wrapped and/or if the bale has a proper or improper bale shape. As used herein, improperly wrapped is intended to mean that the net wrap is missing, partially missing, missed aligned, and/or any combination thereof. Also as used herein, improper bale shape is determined by comparing the circumferential arc of the bale shape to a predetermined arc deviation standard to provide bale shape status, such as, but not limited to size, shape and shape errors.
A first imaging device 218a is mounted to view a portion of the bale circumferential surface 216 from a location “A” downstream of the point of application of the net wrap 132. Location A may be referred to as a baler throat position. In this location, the first imaging device 218a may view the portion of the bale circumferential surface 216 to determine if the wrap net 132 has been properly applied to the bale 130. The first imaging device 218a may be mounted on a sidewall 126 (
A second imaging device 218b is mounted to view a portion of the bale circumferential profile 217 from a location “B” downstream of the point of application of the net wrap 132. Location B may be referred to as a rear bale position. In this location, the second imaging device 218b may view a portion of the bale circumferential profile 217 to determine if the bale 130 has an acceptable shape. The second imaging device 218b may be mounted on a sidewall 126 (
In this exemplary embodiment, the bale monitoring system 100 has been initially designed into the vehicle 10 and baler 20 during fabrication of the baler. In another embodiment, the bale monitoring system 100 may be installed into an existing vehicle 10 and/or baler 20.
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4228638 | Rabe et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4509075 | Simms et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4624179 | Yves et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4674403 | Bryant et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4748802 | Strosser et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4765235 | Schrag et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4850271 | White et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4855924 | Strosser et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4885991 | Borba | Dec 1989 | A |
4924405 | Strosser et al. | May 1990 | A |
4936810 | Strong et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4998961 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5103106 | Golberstein | Apr 1992 | A |
5137362 | LeBeau | Aug 1992 | A |
5152123 | Viaud et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5182987 | Viaud | Feb 1993 | A |
5192245 | Francis et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5231828 | Swearingen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5340259 | Flaskey | Aug 1994 | A |
5380366 | Becker et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388504 | Kluver | Feb 1995 | A |
5408817 | Wagstaff | Apr 1995 | A |
5551218 | Henderson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5631826 | Chow | May 1997 | A |
5749783 | Pollklas | May 1998 | A |
5842920 | Siepker | Dec 1998 | A |
5887076 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5913801 | Bottinger et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5964391 | Cain et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5988053 | Leupe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
H1819 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1999 | H |
6035773 | Rempe | Mar 2000 | A |
6050074 | Clostermeyer | Apr 2000 | A |
6130438 | Torai | Oct 2000 | A |
6209450 | Naaktgeboren et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264553 | Neumann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295797 | Naaktgeboren et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6370852 | Ohlemeyer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6543341 | Lopez | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557336 | Lucand et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6587772 | Behnke | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591875 | Zaun et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6943824 | Alexia et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966162 | Viaud et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981352 | Chow et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7063614 | Vogelgesang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7152634 | Peters et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7400957 | Hofer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404355 | Viaud et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7437866 | Smith et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448316 | Posselius | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8028499 | Viaud | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8200399 | Madsen | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8733242 | Viaud | May 2014 | B2 |
20010018821 | Chow | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020029542 | Davis et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030089081 | Platon | May 2003 | A1 |
20040016204 | Chow et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040182043 | Viaud et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060048654 | Biziorek | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070028579 | Posselius | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070056258 | Behnke | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070186530 | Meier et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070280501 | Walton | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080087177 | Olander et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080171582 | Hoskinson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090107102 | Biziorek | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090201379 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211073 | Pienta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090286582 | Kormann | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100288140 | Smith et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100310129 | Hopfner | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130112094 | Smith et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19753704 | Jun 1999 | DE |
1749437 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1813146 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1935233 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2250875 | Nov 2010 | EP |
403022914 | Jan 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120266763 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |