The present invention relates generally to exhaust treatment for an internal combustion engine and more particularly, but not exclusively, to a method, system, and software utilized to trigger desulfurization (“de-SOx”) to regenerate a NOx adsorber.
The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is working aggressively to reduce pollution from new, heavy-duty diesel trucks and buses by requiring them to meet tougher emission standards that will make new heavy-duty vehicles up to 95% cleaner than older vehicles. Emission filters in the exhaust gas systems of internal combustion engines are used to remove unburned soot particles from the exhaust gas and to convert harmful pollutants such as hydrocarbons (“HC”), carbon monoxide (“CO”), oxides of nitrogen (“NOx”), and oxides of sulfur (“SOx”) into harmless gases.
Exhaust gas is passed through a catalytic converter that is typically located between the engine and the muffler. In operation, the exhaust gases pass over one or more large surface areas that may be coated with a particular type of catalyst. A catalyst is a material that causes a chemical reaction to proceed at a usually faster rate without becoming part of the reaction process. The catalyst is not changed during the reaction process but rather converts the harmful pollutants into substances or gases that are not harmful to the environment.
NOx storage catalyst units or adsorbers are used to purify exhaust gases of combustion engines. These NOx storage catalyst units, in addition to storing or trapping NOx, also trap and store unwanted SOx in the form of sulfates. The adsorption of SOx in the converter reduces the storage capacity of the adsorber and the catalytically active surface area of the catalyst. As such, NOx storage catalyst units must be regenerated to remove both NOx and SOx. The process of regenerating NOx adsorbers varies depending on whether operating in a de-NOx mode (in which NOx is converted and removed from the unit) or a de-SOx mode (in which the unit is ran through a de-SOx process). Accordingly, there is a need for methods, systems and software for determining when to regenerate a NOx adsorber.
One embodiment according to the present invention discloses a unique system for determining when to regenerate a NOx adsorber. Other embodiments include unique apparatuses, systems, devices, hardware, software, methods, and combinations of these for determining when to de-SOx an adsorber utilized to convert harmful pollutants formed as a byproduct of the combustion process in an internal combustion engine into non-harmful substances. Further embodiments, forms, objects, features, advantages, aspects, and benefits of the present invention shall become apparent from the following description and drawings.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the invention is illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
With reference to
The DOC unit 16 is a flow through device that consists of a canister that may contain a honey-comb like structure or substrate. The substrate has a large surface area that is coated with an active catalyst layer. This layer may contain a small, well dispersed amount of precious metals such as, for example, platinum or palladium. As exhaust gas from the engine 12 traverses the catalyst, CO, gaseous HC and liquid HC particles (unburned fuel and oil) are oxidized, thereby reducing harmful emissions. The result of this process is that these pollutants are converted to carbon dioxide and water. In order to function properly, the DOC unit 16 must be heated to a minimum temperature value.
The NOx adsorber 18 is operable to absorb NOx created during the combustion process of the engine 12, thereby dramatically reducing the amount of NOx released into the atmosphere. The NOx adsorber 18 contains a catalyst that allows NOx to adsorb onto the catalyst. A byproduct of running the engine 12 in a lean mode is the production of harmful NOx. The NOx adsorber 18 stores or absorbs NOx under lean engine operating conditions (lambda>1) and releases and catalytically reduces the stored NOx under rich engine operating conditions (lambda<1).
Under NOx regeneration, when the engine is operating under a rich condition at a predetermined temperature range, a catalytic reaction occurs. The stored NOx is catalytically converted to nitrogen (“N2”) and released from the NOx adsorber 18 thereby regenerating the NOx adsorber 18. The NOx adsorber 18 also has a high affinity for trapping sulfur and desulfation or de-SOx, the process for the removal of stored sulfur from the NOx adsorber 18, also requires rich engine operation, but for a longer period of time and at much higher temperatures.
The DPF 20 may comprise one of several type of particle filters known and used in the art. The DPF 20 is utilized to capture unwanted diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) from the flow of exhaust gas exiting the engine 12. DPM is sub-micron size particles found in diesel exhaust. DPM is composed of both solid and liquid particles and is generally classified into three fractions: (1) inorganic carbon (soot), (2) organic fraction (often referred to as SOF or VOF), and (3) sulfate fraction (hydrated sulfuric acid). The DPF 20 may be regenerated at regular intervals by combusting the particulates collected in the DPF 20 through exhaust manipulation or the like. Those skilled in the art would appreciate that, as it relates to the present invention, several different types of DPFs may be utilized in the present invention.
During engine operation, ambient air is inducted from the atmosphere and compressed by a compressor 22 of a turbocharger 23 before being supplied to the engine 12. The compressed air is supplied to the engine 12 through an intake manifold 24 that is connected with the engine 12. An air intake throttle valve 26 is positioned between the compressor 22 and the engine 12 that is operable to control the amount of charge air that reaches the engine 12 from the compressor 22. The air intake throttle valve 26 may be connected with, and controlled by, an electronic control unit (“ECU”) 28, but may be controlled by other means as well. For the purpose of the present invention, it is important to note that the air intake throttle valve 26 is operable to control the amount of charge air entering the intake manifold 24 via the compressor 22.
An air intake sensor 30 is included either before or after the compressor 22 to monitor the amount of ambient air or charge air being supplied to the intake manifold 24. The air intake sensor 30 may be connected with the ECU 28 and generates electric signals indicative of the amount of charge air flow. An intake manifold pressure sensor 32 is connected with the intake manifold 24. The intake manifold pressure sensor 32 is operative to sense the amount of air pressure in the intake manifold 24, which is indicative of the amount of air flowing or provided to the engine 12. The intake manifold pressure sensor 32 is connected with the ECU 28 and generates electric signals indicative of the pressure value that are sent to the ECU 28.
The system 10 may also include a fuel injection system 34 that is connected with, and controlled by, the ECU 28. The purpose of the fuel injection system 30 is to deliver fuel into the cylinders of the engine 12, while precisely controlling the timing of the fuel injection, fuel atomization, the amount of fuel injected, as well as other parameters. Fuel is injected into the cylinders of the engine 12 through one or more fuel injectors 36 and is burned with charge air received from the intake manifold 24. Various types of fuel injection systems may be utilized in the present invention, including, but not limited to, pump-line-nozzle injection systems, unit injector and unit pump systems, common rail fuel injection systems and so forth.
Exhaust gases produced in each cylinder during combustion leaves the engine 12 through an exhaust manifold 38 connected with the engine 12. A portion of the exhaust gas is communicated to an exhaust gas recirculation (“EGR”) system 40 and a portion of the exhaust gas is supplied to a turbine 42. The turbocharger 23 may be a variable geometry turbocharger 23, but other turbochargers may be utilized as well. The EGR system 34 is used to cool down the combustion process by providing a predetermined amount of exhaust gas to the charge air being supplied by the compressor 22. Cooling down the combustion process reduces the amount of NOx produced during the combustion process. An EGR cooler 41 may be included to further cool the exhaust gas before being supplied to the air intake manifold 22 in combination with the compressed air passing through the air intake throttle valve 26.
The EGR system 40 includes an EGR valve 44 this is positioned in fluid communication with the outlet of the exhaust manifold 38 and the air intake manifold 24. The EGR valve 44 may also be connected to the ECU 28, which is capable of selectively opening and closing the EGR valve 44. The EGR valve 44 may also have incorporated therewith a differential pressure sensor that is operable to sense a pressure change, or delta pressure, across the EGR valve 44. A pressure signal 46 may also be sent to the ECU 44 indicative of the change in pressure across the EGR valve 44. The air intake throttle valve 26 and the EGR system 40, in conjunction with the fuel injection system 34, may be controlled to run the engine 12 in either a rich or lean mode.
As set forth above, the portion of the exhaust gas not communicated to the EGR system 40 is communicated to the turbine 42, which rotates by expansion of gases flowing through the turbine 42. The turbine 42 is connected to the compressor 22 and provides the driving force for the compressor 22 that generates charge air supplied to the air intake manifold 24. Some temperature loss in the exhaust gas typically occurs as the exhaust gas passes through the turbine 42. As the exhaust gas leaves the turbine 42, it is directed to the exhaust filtration system 14, where it is treated before exiting the system 10.
A cooling system 48 may be connected with the engine 12. The cooling system 48 is a liquid cooling system that transfers waste heat out of the block and other internal components of the engine 12. Typically, the cooling system 48 consists of a closed loop similar to that of an automobile engine. Major components of the cooling system include a water pump, radiator or heat exchanger, water jacket (which consists of coolant passages in the block and heads), and a thermostat. As it relates to the present invention, the thermostat 50, which is the only component illustrated in
The system 10 includes a doser 52 that may be located in the exhaust manifold 38 and/or located downstream of the exhaust manifold 38. The doser 52 may comprise an injector mounted in an exhaust conduit 54. For the depicted embodiment, the agent introduced through the doser 52 is diesel fuel; however, other embodiments are contemplated in which one or more different dosing agents are used in addition to or in lieu of diesel fuel. Additionally, dosing could occur at a different location from that illustrated. For example, a fuel-rich setting could be provided by appropriate activation of injectors (not shown) that provide fuel to the engine in such a manner that engine 12 produces exhaust including a controlled amount of un-combusted (or incompletely combusted) fuel (in-cylinder dosing). Doser 52 is in fluid communication with a fuel line coupled to the same or a different fuel source (not shown) than that used to fuel engine 12 and is also connected with the ECU 28, which controls operation of the doser 52.
The system 10 also includes a number of sensors and sensing systems for providing the ECU 28 with information relating to the system 10. An engine speed sensor 56 may be included in or associated with the engine 12 and is connected with the ECU 28. The engine speed sensor 56 is operable to produce an engine speed signal indicative of engine rotation speed (“RPM”) that is provided to the ECU 28. A pressure sensor 58 may be connected with the exhaust conduit 54 for measuring the pressure of the exhaust before it enters the exhaust filtration system 14. The pressure sensor 58 may be connected with the ECU 28. If pressure becomes too high, this may indicate that a problem exists with the exhaust filtration system 14, which may be communicated to the ECU 28.
At least one temperature sensor 60 may be connected with the DOC unit 16 for measuring the temperature of the exhaust gas as it enters the DOC unit 16. In other embodiments, two temperature sensors 60 may be used, one at the entrance or upstream from the DOC unit 16 and another at the exit or downstream from the DOC unit 60. These temperature sensors are used to calculate the temperature of the DOC unit 16. In this alternative, an average temperature may be determined, using an algorithm, from the two respective temperature readings of the temperature sensors 60 to arrive at an operating temperature of the DOC unit 60.
Referring to
A first universal exhaust gas oxygen (“UEGO”) sensor or lambda sensor 66 may be positioned in fluid communication with the flow of exhaust gas entering or upstream from the NOx adsorber 18 and a second UEGO sensor 68 may be positioned in fluid communication with the flow of exhaust gas exiting or downstream of the NOx adsorber 18. The UEGO sensors 66, 68 are connected with the ECU 28 and generate electric signals that are indicative of the amount of oxygen contained in the flow of exhaust gas. The UEGO sensors 66, 68 allow the ECU 28 to accurately monitor air-fuel ratios (“AFR”) also over a wide range thereby allowing the ECU 28 to determine a lambda value associated with the exhaust gas entering and exiting the NOx adsorber 18. In alternative embodiments, the UEGO sensors 66, 68 may comprise NOx sensors 66, 68 that are used to monitor NOx levels entering and leaving the NOx adsorber 18.
Referring back to
Referring to
The after-treatment manager module 100 instructs the combustion manager module 102 to control the engine 12 such that the air fuel ratio value or exhaust lambda value at the inlet 69 of the NOx adsorber 18 is selectively cycled to provide reductant to regenerate the NOx adsorber 18. At the inlet 69, the exhaust lambda is controlled through engine management to switch or cycle at a controlled frequency between lean and rich lambda values. In one embodiment, the exhaust has a lean lambda target value of approximately 1.20 and a rich lambda target value of approximately 0.95. The combustion manager module 102 controls the duty cycle of the exhaust lambda at the inlet 69 of the NOx adsorber 18 to a lean lambda value for a first predetermined period of time and a rich lambda value for a second predetermined period of time to regenerate the NOx adsorber 18. The UEGO sensor 66 at the inlet 69 of the NOx adsorber 18 is used by the ECU 28 to monitor the exhaust lambda value entering the NOx adsorber 18.
Referring to
As illustrated, the desulfation trigger module 110 includes an exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 that is operable to generate an estimate of a sulfur accumulation rate associated with the NOx adsorber 18 as a function of a flow of fuel. Starting in 2007, the diesel market in North America shall provide diesel fuel with 15 parts per million (“ppm”) sulfur concentration by weight. With this known sulfur concentration, the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 is operable to calculate an exhaust sulfur flow rate estimation. In one embodiment, the exhaust sulfur flow rate is modeled by the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 as follows:
MSOx=MSOx(fuel)*MSOx(oil)
As such, the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 makes a calculation of the amount of sulfur accumulated in the NOx adsorber 18 as a function of an amount of SOx deposited by fuel consumption or a flow of fuel and an amount of SOx deposited by oil.
In another embodiment, the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 may be modeled by the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 as follows:
MSOx=(fuel*15 ppm*10−6)*scale
wherein fuel flow (“fuel”) is calculated as follows:
fuel=total_fueling*RPM*number of engine cylinders/2/540476.19
The total_fueling variable is a variable that is determined by the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 by obtaining a total amount of fuel injected into the cylinders of the engine 12. The combustion manager module 102 keeps track of the total amount of fuel injected into the cylinders of the engine 12 as it controls the fuel system 34. The RPM or engine speed variable is obtained by the ECU 28 for use by the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 from the speed sensor 56.
The result of the total fueling value being multiplied by the engine speed and the number of engine cylinders is divided by two (2) because there are two revolutions per cycle. The “scale” variable is a predetermined calibrated value that consists of a multiplication factor relating to the amount of SOx deposited by the consumption of engine oil.
Referring to
total fuel flow=(total_fueling/540476.19)*engine speed*number of cylinders/2
In order to get the total fuel flow in grams per second, the following calculation occurs once the total fuel flow value is obtained:
total fuel flow(grams/second)=total fuel flow*453.59/60
As such, the fuel flow calculation module 140 generates a total fuel flow value per second.
The exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 also includes a sulfur fuel flow calculator module 142 that is operable to take the total fuel flow value per second generated by the fuel flow calculation module 140 and generate a sulfur accumulation value as a function of the total fuel flow value. As illustrated, in this embodiment, the sulfur accumulation value from fuel flow is calculated by taking the total fuel flow value per second and converting that value into a grams per frame value with a conversion module 143. The sulfur accumulation value from fuel flow is then calculated as follows:
MSOx(fuel)=Fuel Grams Per Frame*10−6*15 ppm
As previously set forth, starting in 2007 diesel fuel in North America will contain 15 ppm sulfur concentration by weight. As such, the sulfur accumulation value from fuel flow is calculated as a function of the grams of fuel that flow per frame and the amount of sulfur contained in a gram of fuel. The amount of sulfur contained in fuel may vary in other regions and as such, other values other than 15 ppm may be used in other embodiments of the invention.
The sulfur accumulation value from fuel flow that is determined by the sulfur fuel flow calculator module 142 is provided as an input to a total sulfur calculator 144. A sulfur accumulation value from oil 146 is also provided as an input to the total sulfur calculator 144. As previously set forth, the sulfur deposited from engine oil is counted as a multiplication factor acting on the sulfur accumulation rate due to fuel in one embodiment of the invention. The total sulfur calculator 144 is operable to generate a SOx accumulation rate value due to fuel flow or consumption and oil, which is represented as element 148.
The exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 also includes a sulfur accumulation model reset module 150. The sulfur accumulation model reset module 150 causes the exhaust sulfur flow rate module 120 to estimate the sulfur loading rate on the NOx adsorber 18 more aggressively. This higher sulfur load estimation causes the system 10 to execute sulfur regeneration longer to deep clean the NOx adsorber 18. The sulfur accumulation model reset module 150 operates as a function of the following equation:
Mfuel=∫fuel flow*dt>threshold—1 & MSOx>threshold—2
Whenever a total consumed fuel mass exceeds a predetermined threshold and the accumulated sulfur estimate exceeds a second predetermined threshold, the sulfur accumulation model reset module 150 shall estimate sulfur loading more aggressively to thereby cause the combustion manager module 102 to deep clean the NOx adsorber 18. In one embodiment, this causes the counter to increase to a higher level or value, which causes the regeneration process to go longer. The regeneration process occurs until the counter reaches a predetermined low threshold value.
Referring back to
M.SOx=f(MSOx, Catalyst_Bed_Temperature, O2%<0)
where the Catalyst_Bed_Temperature is estimated by obtaining readings from the first and second NOx temperature sensors 62, 64 and the oxygen percentage is obtained from reading the first UEGO or lambda sensor 66. As such, during desulfation, the sulfur removal rate module 122 is operable to generate an estimate of the sulfur removal rate that is utilized by a accumulated sulfur loading module 124.
Referring to
During desulfation mode, the counter module 150 decreases the value of the counter or counts down as a function of an estimated SOx removal rate value 154 generated by the sulfur removal rate module 122. The higher the SOx removal rate, the faster the counter module 150 counts down. Once the counter reaches a predetermined low threshold value, the counter module 150 disables the desulfation mode trigger 152. An adsorber replacement module 156 is included so that the value of the counter may be reset back to zero, or another predetermined starting point, in the event that a new NOx adsorber 18 is placed in the system 10.
Referring back to
Referring to
Referring back to
If a refill is detected and the efficiency of the NOx adsorber 18 noticeably decreases, the tail pipe emission sensor module 130 may trigger an alarm or indication 132 that indicates that a wrong fuel type with a high sulfur concentration may have been used to fill the fuel tank 34. This may require the driver to send the vehicle to a distributor for a lab test of the fuel. The NOx adsorber 18 conversion efficiency is calculated by the tail pipe emission sensor module 130 as follows:
NOxeff=1−CatOutNOx/CatInNox<c
where the catalyst inlet NOx is measured by the first NOx sensor 66, the catalyst outlet NOx is measured by the second NOx sensor 68 and “c” is a calibrated efficiency value.
Another function performed by the tail pipe emission sensor module 130 is, as set forth above, to monitor the efficiency of the NOx adsorber 18 during normal operation. If a drop in efficiency is detected, a signal may be sent to the desulfation mode module 126 that causes it to have the combustion manager module 102 to enter into the desulfation mode. As such, the present invention may control desulfation by using both a sulfur loading model and a tail pipe emission sensor.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the modules described herein may comprise software modules or routines that are executable by the ECV 28. In alternative embodiments of the present invention some of the modules described herein may be replaced by electronic circuits, which may comprise analog and digital circuitry. In other embodiments, the modules may comprise a combination of electronic circuits and microprocessor based components. As such, use of the term module herein should be broadly construed to include one or more of these combinations as well as software designed to provide the functionality described herein.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the inventions are desired to be protected. It should be understood that while the use of words such as preferable, preferably, preferred or more preferred utilized in the description above indicate that the feature so described may be more desirable, it nonetheless may not be necessary and embodiments lacking the same may be contemplated as within the scope of the invention, the scope being defined by the claims that follow. In reading the claims, it is intended that when words such as “a,” “an,” “at least one,” or “at least one portion” are used there is no intention to limit the claim to only one item unless specifically stated to the contrary in the claim. When the language “at least a portion” and/or “a portion” is used the item can include a portion and/or the entire item unless specifically stated to the contrary.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4222236 | Hegedus et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
5473887 | Takeshima et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5529048 | Kurihara et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531203 | Komatsuda et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5600947 | Cullen | Feb 1997 | A |
5635142 | Ichiki et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5743084 | Hepburn | Apr 1998 | A |
5784879 | Dohta et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5878567 | Adamezyk, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894725 | Cullen et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5915359 | Meyer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6185935 | Dickers et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199372 | Wakamoto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202406 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205773 | Suzuki | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212884 | Ohuchi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216449 | Strehlau et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6244046 | Yamashita | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266957 | Nozawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272848 | Okude et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308515 | Bidner et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311482 | Yamashita | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318075 | Gunther et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327847 | Surnilla et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327848 | Poggio et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345498 | Yonekura et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6360530 | Robichaux et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370868 | Kolmanovsky et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374597 | Bidner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389802 | Berger et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401454 | Takano et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408620 | Boegner et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6422003 | Ament et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427439 | Xu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434928 | Manaka | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438944 | Bidner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451602 | Popoff et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453663 | Orzel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453664 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6463733 | Asik et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467259 | Surnilla et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477832 | Surnilla et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481199 | Bidner et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487849 | Bidner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6487850 | Bidner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490858 | Barrett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6490860 | Farmer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497092 | Theis | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502387 | Asik et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6502391 | Hirota et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513319 | Nozawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6513322 | Ohuchi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531099 | Held | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6562753 | Miyoshi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568177 | Surnilla | May 2003 | B1 |
6588205 | Kumagai et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594990 | Kuenstler et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6615577 | Meyer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6644021 | Okada et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651422 | LeGare | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6684627 | Mizuno et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6688101 | Isobe et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6766642 | Binder et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6792346 | Takebayashi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6813879 | Watner et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6813882 | Hepburn et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823658 | Kuroda et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823664 | Nakatani et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823665 | Hirota et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829888 | Kuenstler et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6871492 | Huynh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889497 | Schnaibel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901749 | Hashimoto | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941748 | Pott et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962045 | Kitahara et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6988360 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990799 | Bidner et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7036304 | Sakai | May 2006 | B2 |
7121086 | Nishii et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134274 | Asanuma | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7165394 | Toshioka et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7191590 | Nagaoka et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20010007191 | Ohuchi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010010149 | Ishii et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010013223 | Boegner et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032456 | Yonekura et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010035008 | Nozawa et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020056268 | Isobe et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073696 | Kuenstler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020141908 | Miyoshi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170287 | Hirota et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178716 | Hepburn et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189235 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189580 | Surnilla et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030000205 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037541 | Farmer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030056497 | Kuenstler et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056499 | Binder et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030101713 | Dalla Betta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030106306 | Nakatani et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030106307 | Okada et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131591 | Pott et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134425 | Ceccarini et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177761 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212484 | Takebayashi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213235 | Kitahara et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003587 | Sakai | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060137327 | Shirakawa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080104947 A1 | May 2008 | US |