The invention relates to a system and method for cutting stone.
Various stone materials such as granite are used for many diverse building and landscaping applications. Such materials are frequently desired in thin, flat and smooth pieces. Unfortunately, making such thin flat pieces is a time consuming process, and requires much manpower as well.
It is clear that the need exists for an improved method for making such stone pieces.
It is therefore the primary object of the present invention to provide such a system and method.
According to the invention, a system is provided which includes a rotary saw, and at least one workpiece support slidably mounted relative to the saw and rotatable around a vertical axis up to at least 180 degrees. This system allows a piece of stone to be firmly mounted on the workpiece support, and then cut with the saw using two passes. In the first pass, the stone is cut at least half way through the width of the starting material. The workpiece support is then returned to a starting position relative to the saw and prepared for a second pass to finish the cut. For the second pass, the workpiece support is rotated, preferably 180 degrees, to bring the non-cut side of the stone to face the saw. Before making the pass, it is preferred to place a shim or similar structure at roughly the mid-point of the stone, in the cut. By applying a weight or other force to the cut side of the stone, the shim will act as a lever and the weight will pivot the upper portion of the stone relative to the lower portion of the stone and thereby prevent the cut stone from pinching the saw blade.
With shim and weight in place, the stone is then moved through a second pass relative to the saw blade and the cut is finished.
According to the invention, more than one workpiece support can be positioned relative to the saw and, with this configuration, more than one workpiece can be cut at the same time, thereby increasing efficiency. Further, stone is cut in this method with a smaller blade, thereby conserving space and blade cost, and allowing a greater quantity of product to be made with a smaller blade.
In one embodiment, the saw blade itself is laterally stationary, and is rotated while the workpiece supports are moved, for example in guide tracks. In another embodiment, the workpiece support can be kept laterally stationary, and the blade moved past same. In this latter embodiment, while the workpiece support is preferably still rotatable at least 180 degrees to allow positioning for the second pass by positioning of the support, it is possible to relatively position the saw relative to the support by laterally moving the blade to the other side of the support.
In order to provide a consistent press of the workpiece against the saw, hydraulic or pneumatic cylinders, or electric motors, can be positioned to move the workpiece support relative to the saw.
A detailed description of preferred embodiments of the present invention follows, with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
The invention relates to a stone cutting system and method which allows for cutting of rough stone workpiece material into relatively thin, flat pieces in an efficient and reliable manner. According to the invention, a relatively small rotating saw blade can be used to cut a large quantity of stone, obtaining large output as compared to the size of the blade, and reducing the size of the system and manpower needed to operate same.
Saw 12 can be any readily available rotary saw, preferably having a blade suitable for cutting stone, for example having a diamond cutting edge. Of course, other suitable blades could be used as well. Saw 12 is preferably supported relative to table 14, for example on a support 20, and is rotatable to cut stone as will be further discussed below.
Supports 16, 18 are positioned in this embodiment to allow two pieces of stone to be cut at the same time. Supports 16, 18 are slidably mounted within table 14 so that they can be moved relative to saw 12 in cutting passes where a stone mounted on support 16, 18 is cut by saw 12, preferably to a depth into the rough stone which is slightly more than half way through same. This is further illustrated in
Supports 16, 18 are preferably mounted relative to table 14 and/or saw 12 so that they can be rotated at least about 180 degrees around a substantially vertical axis as schematically illustrated in
In order to increase versatility of system 10, it may be desired to mount saw 12 in such a way that it is vertically and/or laterally adjustable relative to supports 16, 18.
In the embodiment illustrated in the drawings, supports 16, 18 move laterally relative to saw 12 in slots 26 in table 14. Sliding of supports 16, 18 in slots 26 advantageously provides uniform and controlled motion of supports 16, 18 and the workpiece carried on same, relative to saw 12. This results in a reproducible, good quality cut. Supports 16, 18 can be moved along slots 26 using hydraulic, pneumatic and/or electric mechanisms, or in any other manner known to a person of ordinary skill in the art, preferably suitable for applying a consistent pressure on the slide mechanism. In the illustration of
Turning to
The slide mechanism for sliding relative to slots 26 can advantageously utilize lined bearings on chrome rods, tracks with V groove wheels, Teflon™ slides boxed in over box tubing and the like. Of course, other suitable slide structures would be apparent to a person of skill in the art as well, and such other mechanisms are well within the broad scope of the present invention.
After completion of the first pass, support 16, 18 and workpiece 42 positioned thereon are rotated 180 degrees to the position shown in the center illustration of
During the second cut, illustrated in the right illustration of
Returning to the illustration of
It should be appreciated that the system and method of the present invention will allow for greatly increased production as compared to systems cutting stone pieces in a single pass, and further that this is accomplished using a much smaller blade.
It should also be appreciated that, as mentioned above, the saw itself can move back and forth while the supports 16, 18 are held stationary, and this configuration is also within the broad scope of the present invention.
The use of a smaller diameter saw blade, and cutting deeper with the blade by going half way at a time, all result in reduced diamond wear and, thereby, greater blade life. The controlled pressure of the stone against the blade also helps to reduce wear on the blade, and with the present invention, plunge cut speed is set.
It should be appreciated that the system of the present invention is particularly well suited to bulk sawing projects and, particularly, to cutting of natural thin stone or any other building stone products. In further accordance with the invention, a plurality of saws can also be configured in side by side or in a series arrangement to further enhance production which is possible using the system of the present invention.
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the illustrations described and shown herein, which are deemed to be merely illustrative of the best modes of carrying out the invention, and which are susceptible of modification of form, size, arrangement of parts and details of operation. The invention rather is intended to encompass all such modifications which are within its spirit and scope as defined by the claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of provisional application Ser. No. 60/711,153 filed Aug. 24, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60711153 | Aug 2005 | US |