System for delivery of medication in treatment of disorders of the pelvis

Abstract
A system for delivery of medication in treatment of disorders of the pelvis is disclosed. The system includes a medicament applied to an implantable device and an insertion tool. The implantable device has a first end opposite from a second end, with the first end of the implantable device insertable into tissue within the pelvis. A retrieval string is coupled to the second end of the implantable device. The insertion tool includes a shaft extending between a proximal end and a distal end, with a handle coupled to the proximal end of the insertion tool and the distal end of the insertion tool is adapted to couple with the implantable device. The handle includes a notch adapted to releasably secure the retrieval string.
Description

This invention relates to a medicament delivery device and a method of delivering a medicament. In particular, but not exclusively the present invention relates to a device and a method for providing an implant in the uterine myometrium (in females) or prostate gland (in males) and the delivery of medicament to the pelvic area and organs thereof, for example the bladder, peritoneum, and in females the vulva, vagina, fallopian tubes, ovaries and uterus and then into the bloodstream.


There are many drugs which may be administered to the human and animal body for the prevention or treatment of disease. Different types of drugs call for different ways of administering the drug to the human or animal body.


Currently, most benign gynaecological conditions, for example endometriosis or fibroids, are treated using traditional methods of medicament or drug delivery, primarily oral and intravenous administration. Where possible, drugs are provided in pill, capsule, powder or liquid form for oral administration to a human or animal. The drug is then absorbed by the digestive system and will usually enter the blood stream via the liver to take effect. However, far from all drugs are suitable for such administration. For example, many drugs are broken down by the digestion process and destroyed before they can enter the blood stream. This problem is caused by what is commonly referred to as the “first pass liver metabolism” of the human or animal body, i.e. the process by which all substances absorbed by the digestive system must pass through the liver into the blood stream. Therefore, to provide sufficient drug to the female reproductive organs, relatively large doses of a drug are required. These large doses can cause side effects.


To avoid or minimise the problem of the first pass liver metabolism, drugs can be provided by injection, for example drugs desired to take an instant effect in the blood stream of a human or animal body may be injected into a vein, i.e. intravenously. Alternatively, drugs may be injected into muscle tissue from which the drug is absorbed more slowly into the blood stream. Drugs for injection into muscle tissue may, for example, be provided in an oily base which helps to regulate the rate of absorption. However, injections can be painful and difficult, particularly injections into muscle tissue, and can lead to tissue damage where frequent injections are required on a long term basis, e.g. of insulin for diabetics.


Other types of drug delivery include nasal sprays for administration of drugs to the nasal tissues and lungs; patches, such as the Nicorette® patch, for the application of Nicotine, or Ortho Evra, a contraceptive patch which releases oestrogen/progesterone through the skin; and lotions or ointments for topical application, i.e. directly to an affected part of the body.


However, these alternative types of drug delivery means can suffer from disadvantages. For example, skin patches can cause skin irritation, suffer from disattachment and cause cosmetic issues.


Although the above drug delivery methods are useful for particular types of drugs and medicines, with the exception of intramuscular depot injections, they are unable to provide therapeutic levels of drugs over a long term, e.g. weeks, months and years rather than days, without repeated application by the patient, a carer, physician or general practitioner.


For application of drugs on a long term basis, various implants have been developed. One such type of implant may be inserted under the skin and have a mechanism for slowly releasing a drug into the blood stream of the human or animal in which it is implanted. For example, Norplant® or Implanon® comprise an implant having small capsules or rods which slowly release levonorgestrel or etonorgestrel into the blood stream to provide a contraceptive effect for women. Norplant® can be effective for up to five years.


However, these implants inserted under the skin suffer from a number of disadvantages. In particular the insertion of such an implant is painful, can cause significant bruising and discomfort at the implant site and requires local anaesthesia on both insertion and removal. In addition, as such implants are placed under the skin in for example the arm, they can be visible and cause discolouration of the skin. Furthermore, as the arm contains many different types of tissue and planes of tissue, movement of the implant along or through these tissue planes can occur. This can mean the implant moves to locations other than where it was placed during insertion which can lead to complications for the patient, in particular during removal of the implant. Difficulties with the Norplant® implant has led to it being withdrawn from clinical use.


For gynaecological conditions, long term local drug delivery through the vagina or endometrium is useful to deliver drugs to the pelvic region and organs thereof for example to the bladder, peritoneum, vulva, vagina, ovaries and uterus.


Current delivery means include vaginal creams, gels, intrauterine devices (contraceptive coils, IUD or IUCD) and vaginal rings or tampons.


Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are placed in the endometrial cavity typically to provide a contraceptive effect. For example, Leiras (Schering AG) market an intrauterine device called Mirena which releases 20 mcg of levonorgestrel, to reduce the thickening of the endometrium of the uterus, each day for up to 5 years.


Vaginal rings, comprising soft plastic rings of around 4 cm to 5 cm in diameter impregnated with a desired drug, are placed in the vagina around the cervix where they slowly release a drug into the bloodstream through the soft tissue of the cervix. Organon's Nuvaring releases oestrogen/progesterone.


Although the above provide long term local drug delivery to the pelvic region, for various reasons, they tend to suffer from low levels of patient compliance.


Typically creams and gels are considered by patients to be messy and unhygienic while vaginal rings can be uncomfortable, particularly during sexual intercourse, and may cause discharge. Intrauterine devices require inconvenient regular visits to the clinic for physician fitting and can cause severe discomfort such as stomach cramps due to the direct application of levonorgestrel to the endometrium of the uterus. In addition, such intrauterine devices may cause discharge, menstrual disturbance and fertility effects.


It is an aim of the present invention to provide means to deliver medicaments to the pelvic region which minimises the above difficulties.


According to the present invention there is provided an implantable medicament delivery device which is insertable into the myometrium or prostate comprising means capable of providing controlled delivery of a medicament over a period of time.


A medicament may be any pharmaceutical, neutraceutical, prophylactic or therapeutic agent wherein a therapeutic agent includes, but is not limited to, means for radiotherapy such as radioactive sources for example caesium, iridium, radioactive iodine, radioactive strontium or radioactive phosphorus.


The term “medicament” herein also includes energy sources which may be delivered to the myometrium by targeting the delivery device. Such energy sources include electromagnetic radiation, heating and cooling energies such as to selectively destroy tissues.


Preferably the medicament delivery device is an implant which can be insertable into the myometrium, or prostate and retainable therein for a defined period of time.


The retention of the implantable delivery device in the myometrium (in females) or prostate (in males) provides for direct and local delivery of a medicament to the pelvic region and organs thereof for example the bladder, peritoneum, bloodstream and in females the vulva, vagina, ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus over a determined period of time.


Preferably the implantable delivery device is capable of being insertable in and retainable in the smooth muscle myometrial tissue of the cervix.


Insertion and retention of the implantable medicament delivery device in the myometrium of the cervix enables the implant to be checked and monitored by speculum examination or other visualisation or palpation following implantation.


Alternatively the implantable delivery device may be inserted in any suitable location in the myometrium, usually of the body of the uterus. The implant may be placed in the myometrium of the body of the uterus, or other positions not accessible by access via the vagina.


Preferably the implantable medicament delivery device comprises a body having an outer surface and opposing first and second ends said body comprising a medicament wherein the first end of the body is a semi-sharp point.


A semi-sharp point enables the tissue to be sufficiently disrupted to allow insertion of the implantable device, but causes minimal tissue damage.


In one preferred arrangement the body of the device is elongate and the second end of the body includes a head portion wherein the head portion is a lateral extension from the longitudinal axis of the elongate body.


Preferably the head portion is a substantially flat plate which extends in all radial directions from the second end of the body of the device.


The provision of a semi-sharp point at a first end of the delivery device is advantageous as it allows the device to be easily inserted into the smooth muscle of the myometrium or the tissue of the prostate.


Preferably the means capable of providing the controlled delivery of a medicament over a period of time is a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier such as at least one of a hydrogel, a silicone based material, elastomer, proteinaceous material, polyethylene glycol (PEG) material, polysaccharide or other carbohydrate material, microspheres, polymeric material or plastics material which may comprise, be contained by, or coated onto the device, or other means known to those skilled in the art.


Preferably the means capable of providing the controlled delivery of a medicament are present in the body of the device.


Alternatively, in those embodiments wherein there is a head, the means capable of providing the controlled delivery of a medicament may be present in the head of the device.


In particular embodiments the means are present in both the body and the head of the device.


In embodiments where the means capable of providing the controlled delivery of a medicament are provided in the body of the device, medicament delivery is substantially through the myometrium to the tissues and organs of the pelvic region.


In embodiments where the means capable of providing the controlled delivery of a medicament are provided in the head of the device, medicament delivery is substantially to the vaginal cavity and tissues and organs of the pelvic region.


Preferably the second end of the device includes retrieval means.


Retrieval means are advantageous as they allow the implant to be removed from the myometrium or prostate tissue after a determined period of time. Thus the delivery device can be easily removed from the body and does not require to be retained in the body forever. Removal of the implantable device provides a means of control over the length of time an active agent of a medicament is delivered.


The retrieval means can be any means which allow the removal of the implantable device from the myometrium or the prostate following a determined period of time.


In arrangements of the device which are insertable and retainable in the myometrium, preferably the retrieval means comprises an elongate flexible member, for example a thin length of cord, twine or fibre or string.


Preferably the elongate flexible member can be left outside the myometrium and soft tissue surrounding the uterus and/or vaginal cavity without causing irritation to a patient, nor affecting sexual intercourse. When it is desired to remove the implantable delivery device from the tissues in which the implant is inserted, for example the myometrium, the flexible member can be manipulated to pull the implant out of the tissue.


Preferably the second end of the device for example the head and/or retrieval means remain visible or palpable during examination by a physician when, in use, the delivery device is inserted into the myometrium or prostate.


This is advantageous as the location of the implantable delivery device can be easily monitored and checked by visual or physical inspection.


Preferably, the overall implantable device of the present invention is significantly smaller than the overall size of coils, IUD or vaginal rings. This is advantageous as there will be less discomfort to the person in which the drug delivery device is implanted and less likelihood of rejection of the implant by the body or responses such as inflammation.


Preferably the device has an axial length in the range 5 mm to 45 mm.


More preferably the device has an axial length in the range 10 mm to 45 mm.


Preferably the device has a diameter of from 0.5 mm to 4 mm.


Preferably the body has a large surface area to volume ratio. This has the advantage of providing maximal absorption of the drug into the surrounding tissues and/or smooth muscle.


The device of the present invention may be used to deliver a wide range of active agents for example, but not limited to, steroids, hormones such as a progestin, agents which promote a contraceptive effect, for example levonorgestrel or etonorgestrel, agents for treating disorders of the pelvis, for example, GnRH analogues, NSAIDs, COX-II inhibitors and aromatase inhibitors, vagina and organs and tissues thereof, cytotoxic agents for killing cancer cells or treating cancer, particularly cancer cells of the bladder, prostate or cervix or other pelvic malignancies and agents for the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy, impotence, erectile dysfunction and the like. Further, the device may be used to deliver agents for the treatment of an over active bladder, such drugs including anti-cholinergic drugs or calcium antagonists, or agents for radiotherapy.


Preferably the medicament of the device is chosen from the group consisting of, but not limited to, anti-infectives, antimicrobials, antivirals, antibiotics, anti-allergenics, anti-inflammatories, anti-fungals, anti-cholinesterases, nutritional agents such as essential amino-acids, fats and vitamins, prebiotics, probiotics and acidifiers, cardiovascular agents, anti-hypertensive agents and chemotherapeutic agents.


Preferably the medicament is a therapy for oestrogen dependent proliferative disorders of the pelvis, for example endometriosis and/or fibroids and other pelvic disorders as would be known to those skilled in the art for example functional cysts and polycystic ovary syndrome.


Preferably said therapy for endometriosis includes progestins, GnRH agonists and antagonists, NSAIDs, COX-II inhibitors, combined oral contraceptives, Danazol, smooth muscle relaxants or aromatase inhibitors. The skilled person would also appreciate other similar therapies which could be used in relation to such disorders and the suitable dosage that would be required.


A drug delivered by the present invention may additionally or alternatively include a microbicide. A microbicide is any agent detrimental to, or destructive of, the life of microbes, viruses or bacterial organisms. Such a microbicide could be used to destroy organisms responsible for sexually transmitted diseases such as gonorrhoea, chlamydia, genital herpes, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Human Papilloma Virus or bacterial vaginosis.


The concentration and the time period over which the above active agents and those described below should be provided will be as determined by those skilled in the art. Those skilled in the art can determine these parameters, which depend on for example the potency (the amount required to effect the desired change), toxicity and in vivo diffusion of the active agent using standard procedures.


Preferably, in use, the cumulative release of therapeutic agent is in an amount selected from 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 99% and 100% relative to the total amount of medicament in the device after implantation for a period of 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years or 5 years.


According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a kit for implanting a device of the first aspect of the invention comprising

    • a device according to the first aspect of the invention and an insertion tool, said tool comprising an elongate shaft, said shaft having handle means at a first end thereof and device mounting means at a second opposite end wherein the medicament delivery device of the first aspect of the invention is mountable on the insertion tool.


According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of providing a medicament to a female mammal comprising the step of inserting a device according to a first aspect of the invention into the myometrium.


The implantable delivery device is capable of being inserted into the smooth muscle myometrial tissue of the cervix via the vagina, into the myometrium of the uterine body through serosa surrounding the myometrium during open or laparoscopic surgery or into the myometrium through the endometrial cavity.


Preferably the method of the third aspect of the invention comprises the steps of

    • a) providing the implantable medicament delivery device of the first aspect of the invention,
    • b) introducing the medicament delivery device into the body via the vagina,
    • c) penetrating the myometrium with the medicament delivery device, and
    • d) inserting the medicament delivery device into the myometrium.


Preferably the method further comprises the step of mounting the implantable medicament delivery device on an insertion tool.


Particular embodiments of the medicament delivery device are implantable in the prostate. The prostate is a gland in males which surrounds the urethra below the bladder.


Preferably the implant is insertable into the prostate by a transrectal route. Alternatively the implant can be inserted into the prostate by a trans-perineal route.


Preferably the medicament delivery device is insertable into the prostate using ultrasound.


Provision of an implantable medicament delivery device in the prostate has the advantage that drugs can be delivered to the tissue of the prostate, tissue surrounding the prostate, and the bloodstream. Further, delivery of drugs directly to the prostate means the drugs are not subjected to liver metabolism as would be the case for drugs provided orally.


Preferably the prostate implantable medicament delivery device provides for the cumulative release of a therapeutic agent in an amount selected from 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 99% and 100% relative to the total amount of medicament in the device after implantation for a period of 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years or 5 years.


According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided the use of a delivery device according to the first aspect of the invention to provide long term local delivery, for example 3 months to 5 years, of medicaments to the pelvic region and organs thereof, for example to the bladder, peritoneum, vulva, vagina, ovaries and uterus.


In one preferred embodiment of the fourth aspect of the invention a device according to the first aspect of the present invention is used to deliver medicament(s) to treat gynaecological conditions, for example endometriosis, fibroids, cervical cancer or overactive bladder.


In a second preferred embodiment of the fourth aspect of the invention a device according to the first aspect of the present invention is used to treat male conditions for example benign prostatic hypertrophy, impotence, erectile dysfunction and the like.


The medicament delivery device and method of the present invention promote smooth, controlled release of drugs to the pelvic region, which allows absorption of drugs without subjecting drugs to liver metabolism.





Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is an illustration of an implantable medicament delivery device according to the invention for delivery of medicament to the tissues of the myometrium and pelvic region;



FIG. 2 is an illustration of an implantable medicament delivery device according to the invention for delivery of medicament to the tissues of the vaginal cavity and pelvic region;



FIGS. 3, 4, 5 and 6 are illustrations of embodiments of the medicament delivery device according to the invention;



FIG. 7 is a saggital illustration of the female pelvic region of a medicament delivery device of FIG. 1 in use;



FIG. 8 is an end view of the illustration in FIG. 4 along the line A-A illustrating the placement of the device;



FIG. 9 is a coronal view of the illustration in FIG. 4 along line B-B;



FIG. 10 shows an illustration of the embodiment of a medicament delivery device as shown in FIG. 1 mounted on an insertion tool;



FIG. 11 shows an illustration of the embodiment of a medicament delivery device as shown in FIG. 2 mounted on an insertion tool;



FIG. 12 shows an illustration of an embodiment of device mounting means wherein the mounting means are formed by a stepped protrusion on the insertion tool capable of cooperating with a depression provided on the delivery device;



FIG. 13 shows an embodiment of a handle means of an insertion tool; and



FIG. 14 is an illustration of an embodiment of an implant of the present invention inserted in the prostate.





Referring to FIG. 1, in one embodiment, the implantable medicament delivery device comprises an elongate cylindrical body 2 with a first end 4 and a second end 6. In this embodiment head portion 8 extends laterally from the second end 6 of the body 2 such that a flange is provided around the circumference of the body 2 at the second end. A semi-sharp point 10 is provided at the first end 4 of the body 2. In the embodiment shown the head portion 8 is a substantially flat plate which includes a depression 12. When, in use, the body of the device is implanted in the tissues of the myometrium, the head portion 8 minimises the likelihood of the tissue of the implant being pushed too far into the tissue during insertion of the implant or the myometrium tissue growing over the implant. It also provides means by which the position of the implant can be checked by visual or physical means.


In the embodiment described which is insertable into the myometrium, retrieval means 14 are provided by a cord. The cord extends substantially from the centre point of the depression 12 in the head portion 8. In use, the cord extends from the second end of the implant and allows the device to be removed from the tissue after suitable delivery of the medicament or if the patient requests removal. The device is typically retained in the body for at least a day, a few weeks, months or up to 5 years. It may be removed at any point during this period. In embodiments wherein the device is comprised of biodegradable material the device may not need to be removed at a later time point and thus will not require a head portion or retrieval means.


In this embodiment the means capable of providing controlled delivery of the medicament is located in or on the elongate body 2 of the device. Delivery of the medicament is substantially through the myometrium and into pelvic organs and tissues. This embodiment of the device is particularly advantageous for the delivery of medicament for the treatment of endometriosis and or fibroids.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of the present in invention wherein the elongate body 2 may be shorter in length, approximately 5 mm to 20 mm in length and in which the head portion 8 is larger typically around 12 mm in width. In such an embodiment the means capable of providing controlled delivery of a medicament over a period of time is located in or on the head portion.


In use, the body 2 is inserted in the tissues of the myometrium and the head portion remains in the vaginal cavity. This embodiment of the device substantially delivers medicament to the vaginal cavity, mucosa thereof and pelvic tissues, such an embodiment is particularly advantageous for delivery of medicaments suitable for treating bacterial vaginosis.


Alternative embodiments of the implantable device are illustrated by FIGS. 3 to 6. In these embodiments the body of the implant may be spiral or corkscrew shaped (FIG. 3), generally J or U shaped such that the second end of the implant forms a loop or hook (FIGS. 4 and 6) or an elongate mesh cylinder (FIG. 5). As shown in FIG. 4 a semi-sharp point may not be required at the first end of the body 4 to allow insertion into the tissues.


The body may be any suitable shape which allows the implant to be inserted into the myometrium or prostate. Indeed the cross section of the body can be of any preferred shape, which allows insertion of the implant into the myometrium or prostate, or that influences the drug delivery characteristics of the implantable delivery device. For example the body of the device may be cross-shaped to increase the surface area of the delivery device exposed to the surrounding tissue. Further, the body may be formed by a mesh or other method to increase the surface area of the implant in contact with the myometrial or prostate tissue. The amount of surface area of the implant in contact with surrounding tissue or muscle can influence the drug delivery characteristics of the implant.


As shown in FIGS. 4 and 6 the retrieval means may comprise a hook at the second end of the implantable device wherein the second end of the body 2 is bent toward the first end to provide a hook. In this embodiment the retrieval means restricts the body 2 from becoming buried in the soft tissue enabling retrieval of the implant from soft tissue and the smooth muscle of the myometrium or the prostate. In addition, the hook provides means by which the location of the implant can be checked by a physician by visual or physical means.


Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 3, the retrieval means can be a slot capable of accepting a screwdriver or other means for rotating the implantable delivery device in the tissue to insert or remove the device from the tissue.


In the embodiment illustrated by FIG. 1 the body 2 comprises the medicament delivery means. In particular embodiments, not shown in FIG. 1, a length of the body 2 between the point 4 and retrieval means 14 may have a reduced diameter relative to the diameter of the body 2 at the first 4 and second ends 6. In such embodiments the drug delivery means may comprise a cylinder of material formed around the reduced diameter portion of the body 2. The medicament delivery means can be any suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for example, a hydrogel carrying the active agent to be delivered by the medicament delivery device. In another example, the delivery means is a silicone based material, elastomer, proteinaceous material, polyethylene glycol (PEG) material, polysaccharide or carbohydrate material, microspheres, polymeric material or plastics material which may comprise, be contained by, or coated onto the device. The above drug delivery devices may also comprise, be contained by, or coat the head 8 of the device. This allows, as discussed in relation to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, for delivery of medicament to the vaginal cavity.


In a preferred embodiment, the body of the implant which may be porous, non-porous or microporous, can be dipped into a solution of the selected drug delivery medium containing a solution or slurry of drug, such that a thin layer of drug and drug delivery medium is coated onto the body of the implant and bonds securely in the dry state to the body of the implant via a mechanical or adhesive hold.


Alternatively, the medicament can be impregnated, or absorbed by or into the device and allow the medicament to be released over time. As a further alternative the medicament may be applied to the device using any suitable means that allow the medicament to be attached or bonded to the device and which allow the medicament to be available for absorption/release into the surrounding tissues, for example the myometrium or vaginal cavity.


The drug delivery medium may be capable of slowly releasing the active agent of the medicament into the myometrium, vaginal cavity or the prostate, and thus providing drugs to the pelvic region and organs thereof the surrounding soft tissues and blood vessels.


Hydrogel releases drug by diffusion or via microcracks in the hydrogel. An alternative biodegradable hydrogel system releases drug via an erosion or degradation mechanism. Varying release rates of drugs can be achieved, as can continuous dosing with small levels of drugs, and flexibility of drug release may depend on different drugs being utilised


Depending of the release characteristics of the hydrogel and the chemical composition of the active agent; release of the active agent will typically occur up to 5 years from implantation of the delivery device.


The medicament delivery device may be formed by any biocompatible material, for example the medicament delivery device can be formed from plastics or biocompatible metals. Suitable materials include, but are not limited to, high density polyethylene (HDPE), ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyethyleneterephthalate (PET), polytetra-fluoroethylene (PTFE), polycarbonate (PC), styrene-butadine-styrene (SBS), stainless steel (361/316L/317), nickel free stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloy (CoCrMo), titanium (specifically Ti6Al4V) and Liquid Metal.


In one particular embodiment of the delivery device, the delivery device is formed from the medium carrying the drug. In this example, if the medium carrying the drug is absorbable, the complete delivery device may be absorbed by the body over the period of time that the drug is administered.


Wherein the implant itself is the medium by which the drug to be administered is carried it can be envisaged that an insertion device for example a trocar containing the implant may be used to deliver the implant. In this embodiment the delivery device may be pushed out of or injected from the trocar into the myometrium 44. The use of an implant comprising the medium in which the drug to be administrated is included, would allow insertion of the implant into the myometrium 44 and delivery of the drug to be limited to a shorter time scale for example 1 day, 3 months to 12 months. The implant would not require to be removed at a later date as it may degrade over time and be absorbed by the body.


The drug may be delivered to the myometrium 44 and be absorbed within a few minutes, hours, days or weeks depending on the medium. It can be appreciated that where the implant comprises the drug delivery medium, removal of the implant is not required. An absorbable implant therefore does not require retrieval means.


The uterine myometrium has few or no somatic pain fibres and thus insertion, provision and withdrawal of the implant in the myometrium will cause minimal pain and discomfort to the patient.


A device of the present invention capable of being implanted into the myometrium tissue is advantageous over subcutaneous delivery devices previously known in the art, such as Norplant® which are inserted under the skin which has somatic sensory (pain) nerves.


As there is little tissue or muscle movement in the myometrium compared with for example the tissues of the arm or the leg and the myometrium does not comprise as many layers or planes of tissue as in the arm or leg, there is little likelihood of the implant moving to a different location following insertion.


As shown in FIG. 7, the female human genital area comprises a bladder 30, urethra 32, vaginal cavity 34, cervix 36, uterus 38 and anus 40. In particular, the cervix 36, at a position between the vaginal cavity 34 and uterus 38, comprises the cervical canal 42 leading from the vaginal cavity 34 into the uterus 38 and surrounding smooth muscle known as the myometrium 44. The myometrium is defined by the serosa 46 (an epithelial layer of cells) and the endometrium 48. An end view of the cervix along line A-A is shown in FIG. 8.


In use, an embodiment of the implant can be inserted into the myometrium via the vagina and then through the cervix or alternatively may be inserted into the myometrium during open or laproscopic surgery.


The myometrium of the cervix is in a convenient location, at the top of the vaginal cavity, for insertion and removal of the implant via vaginal access. Further insertion of the device by this route has the advantage that the implant can be suitably located using a speculum in an outpatient setting. The insertion of the implant in the myometrium would be similar in both the time taken and the discomfort to the patient as the taking of a smear.


Insertion of the implantable medicament delivery device during open or laproscopic surgery has the advantage of allowing the implant to be placed at any suitable location in the myometrium, usually in the body of the uterus. The implant may thus be placed in the myometrium of the body of the uterus, or other positions which would not be accessible by access via the vagina.


Location of the implant within the smooth muscle myometrial tissue of the cervix and uterus provides a novel means of drug delivery to the pelvic region and organs thereof for example to the bladder, peritoneum, vulva, vagina, ovaries and uterus. Local delivery of active agents of a medicament via insertion of the implant in the uterine myometrium promotes rapid, efficient absorption of the active agent directly into these organs the surrounding tissue and then the bloodstream. Further, delivery of medicaments in this way avoids the first pass liver effect.


The active insertion of the implantable delivery device into the smooth muscle of the cervix of the uterine body means that the present invention differs from an IUD or a vaginal ring as an IUD is located in the cavity of the uterus (endometrium) and vaginal rings are placed at the top of the vagina around the cervix.


While inserted in the myometrium the device will not be felt by the patient. As previously discussed, this provides a further advantage of the present invention over intrauterine devices and vaginal rings. Furthermore, the device of the present invention will not cause menstrual or fertility disturbances and will be acceptable to women of a range of religious faiths.


Moreover, drug delivery by means placed around tissues or in cavities such as vaginal rings and intrauterine devices can suffer from decreased absorption as the active agents have to pass through epethelial layers overlying the surrounding tissues before they enter the tissue. For example, drugs released from a vaginal ring must pass through the vaginal epithelium before being absorbed into the vaginal wall and passing into the blood stream.


Locating medicament delivery means and delivery of the medicament in the myometrium minimises the risk of poor absorption as the active agents are not required to pass through epithelium. Medicament absorption is facilitated by high local blood flow.


In particular embodiments locating medicament delivery means in the myometrium and delivery of the medicament into the vaginal cavity enables delivery to the epithelium lining the vagina and the local tissues thereof.


Therefore drug delivery directly into the myometrium or vagina will likely require smaller amounts of a drug to achieve significant clinical affect, substantially reducing the risk of side effects.


In specific embodiments of the medicament delivery devices, suitable for delivery of drugs to the tissues of the myometrium, for example FIG. 1, the body 2 of the medicament delivery device typically has a diameter of 2 mm and a length of 20 mm. These diameters and lengths are, of, course, for guidance only and other suitable dimensions will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example depending of the amount of drug to be delivered the length of the body may be 20 mm or 30 mm.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of the device for delivery of drugs to the vaginal cavity. In this embodiment, the body is preferably around 5 to 10 mm in length and the head is around 8 to 15 mm in width.


The implant may have any structure suitable for insertion and retention in the smooth muscle of the myometrium or the tissue of the prostate. For example the implant may comprise barbed portions or surface patterns to promote retention of the implant in the myometrium or prostate. This may be advantageous if movement of the tissue in which the implant is inserted is likely to cause the implant to work loose and move from its intended position.


To aid insertion of the medicament delivery device into the myometrium by a vaginal route an insertion tool may be used.


An embodiment of an insertion tool is shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 with the implantable devices illustrated by FIGS. 1 and 2 respectively mounted thereon. In the embodiment shown, the insertion tool comprises a curved stainless steel shaft 60 of approximately 20 to 25 cm in length and around 2 mm in diameter. A handle element 62 of around 2 to 4 cm may be provided on the shaft. A particular embodiment of a handle element is illustrated in FIG. 13.


A first end of the shaft is provided with device mounting means 74 and a second end is provided with handle means 62. In the example shown the device mounting means, illustrated more clearly in FIG. 12, comprises a stepped protrusion 66 which provides a surface 68 against which the second end of the implantable device can abut. In particular, as shown in FIG. 12 a protruding portion 70 of the device mounting means is received by the depression 12 provided on the head portion 8 of the implantable device. The cord 14 of the implantable device is pulled along the length of the shaft 60 and is releasably fixable in a notch 72 provided in the handle means 62 of the insertion tool. The fixing of the cord 14 in the notch 72 aids the mounting of the device on the shaft of the insertion tool.


The device is mounted on the first end of the insertion tool and then the device is introduced into the body via the vagina. Using the insertion tool the device is advanced into the vagina 34 towards the cervix 36 and inserted into the myometrium 44. The point 4 of the implant facilitates the easy insertion into the smooth muscle of the myometrium 44.


The device is inserted into the myometrium until only the head portion of the device or retrieval means remain outside.


After a determined period of time, the implant can be removed from the myometrium. Removal may be due to the implant reaching the end of its useful life, i.e. the drug has been administered for the intended length of time or the patient requesting removal of the implant. The implantable delivery device can be removed by pulling on the retrieval means 14, for example a cord or hook to withdraw the implant from the myometrium 44. Again, this is a straightforward procedure without routine need for local anaesthetic.


The delivery device is typically removed from the tissue after it has released a therapeutic agent in an amount selected from 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 99% and 100% relative to the total amount of medicament in the device after implantation for a period of 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years or 5 years.


Alternative insertion tools may be used to insert the device.


For example if the implant has a blunt first end 4, as illustrated in FIG. 4, an insertion tool with a semi-sharp point may be used to penetrate the myometrium or prostate tissue and enable insertion of the implant.


This may be advantageous, as the implant which is retained in the tissue does not then require to have a semi-sharp portion.


In further embodiments of the insertion tool, instead of or in addition to device mounting means, the insertion tool may comprise means for releasably containing the implant within the tool. This embodiment of the insertion tool is driven into the myometrium, the implantable device is released into the myometrium and the tool is then withdrawn leaving the implant in place. For example, the insertion tool may comprise a collar for releasably retaining the medicament delivery device.


During insertion, use and removal the implantable device may be manipulated using any suitable surgical tool, such as forceps or the like.


As discussed above, the implantable medicament delivery device can be provided with medicament for release into the surrounding tissues in a number of ways.


Where the medium carrying the active agent of the medicament is provided by the body of the delivery device, the agent is released from the medium and passes through drug delivery means present in the delivery device to enter the surrounding tissue, for example the myometrial tissues. Drug delivery means may be provided along the entire length, at least part of the body, the head, or the body and head of the implantable device.


When inserted in the myometrium the body of the medicament delivery device is surrounded by smooth muscle and soft tissue. As smooth muscle of the cervix is highly vascularised, drug delivery to these tissues show good pharmacokinetics.


These drugs are able to pass through the highly vascularised tissues of the myometrium and target the pelvic region and organs thereof, for example, the bladder, peritoneum, and in females the vulva, vagina, ovaries and uterus. The drugs may further enter the bloodstream without being subjected to first pass liver metabolism.


Alternatively, drug delivery means may be provided at the head portion at the second end of the delivery device. When, in use, the implant is inserted into myometrial tissue, the head portion protrudes from the myometrial tissue into the vagina. In this particular embodiment, the implant provides a means of targeting drug delivery to the tissues of the vagina.


The implantable delivery device may be retained in the myometrium or the prostate and drug delivered over a period of at least, 1 day, 1 to 3 months, 1 to 6 months, 1 to 12 months, 1 to 2 years, 1 to 3 years or 1 to 5 years.


The implant of the present invention may be used to deliver a wide range of drugs. In particular, the implant can be used to deliver drugs which cannot be delivered orally.


Examples of conditions which can be treated using the drug delivery device will now be provided.


Endometriosis


Endometriosis is a painful condition caused by the endometrium (cells lining the uterus) migrating to other parts of the body. This can cause functional and hormonally responsive endometrial lesions. Typically lesions are found on the uterine muscles, ovary, peritoneum and intestine. Symptoms of endometriosis include excessive bleeding, dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain and infertility (up to 60% of women suffering from endometriosis become infertile).


Fibroids


Fibroids or myoma are benign encapsulated tumours of the smooth muscle and/or fibrous tissue elements of the uterine myometrium. They are usually asymptomatic, but may give rise to menstrual and/or fertility problems.


At present, an oral treatment (Danazol) is one of the most effective drugs to treat endometriosis, but the androgenic side effects of this drug limits treatment to 6 months. Endometriosis can also be treated using subcutaneous depot injections or nasal sprays of GnRH analogues. However, these treatments also have unpleasant side effects such as bone density loss, hot flushes and nausea.


The present implantable medicament delivery device provides pharmacokinetic advantages over the above for the treatment of endometriosis and fibroids. In particular the present delivery system provides long term delivery of a drug locally to the pelvic region, without the disadvantage of current local delivery systems such as vaginal rings or intrauterine devices.


A number of active agents may be provided using the device of the present invention for treatment of endometriosis.


Progestin


Progestins have advantages over Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonists in that they are cheaper with an improved side effect profile. In addition, Progestin therapy is most effective in controlling the symptoms associated with endometriosis, more specifically dysmenorrhea.


Progestin refers to synthetic progestogens wherein Progestogen is a generic term for all substances with progesterone like activity. Progesterone refers to the natural progesterone molecule.


There are two main groups of progestogen, progesterone and its analogues (dydrogesterone, gestrinone and medroxyprogesterone) and testosterone analogues (norethisterone and norgestrel). The newer progestogens (desogestrel, megestrol, norelgestromin, norgestimate, etonogestrol, etynodiol or ethynodiol and gestodene) are all derivatives of norgestrel; levonorgestrel is the active isomer of norgestrel and has twice its potency. Progesterone and its analogues are less androgenic than the testosterone derivatives. Testosterone analogues are the norethindrone family (estranes)—including norethindrone, norethindrone acetate, ethynodiol diacetate, lynestrenol, and norethisterone acetate; and the levonorgestrel family (gonanes)—including levonorgestrel, norgestrel, desogestrel, norgestimate, gestodene, megestrol, norelgestromin, and etonogestrol.


Common progestins include medroxyprogesterone and levonorgestrel.


Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDS)


Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drug (NSAIDs) have good efficacy, low cost and comparatively mild side effect profile, and offer immediate pain management. They are most effective in controlling the symptoms associated with endometriosis. Common NSAID's include mefenamic acid, diclofenac or piroxicam.


GnRH Analogues


The main therapy shown to improve the severity of endometriosis is the gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists.


However, this class suffers two main drawbacks, these being cost and severe side effects profile primarily bone density loss associated with inducing a temporary chemical menopause. Common GnRH agonists include leuprolide, goserelin and nafarelin.


In addition to the above sole therapies the device of the present invention can also be used to deliver a number of combination therapies. For example,


Progestin/NSAID,


Progestin/GnRH analogues,


GnRH/NSAID or,


GnRH add back therapy (tibolone)


GnRH with Add Back Therapy


Add-back therapy in conjunction with a GnRH agonist does not eradicate bone loss, however it does reduce the rate of bone demineralization and hence, enable longer use of GnRH agonists. The progestin tibolone is of particular interest for use as add back therapy, particularly for osteoporosis prophylaxis.


Owing to the poor solubility of all proposed drugs in water, a hydrogel (flooded with water, thus low driving farce only required to release drugs) is ideally used as the drug carrier on the implant. The porous but permeable active drug/carrier can be coated onto the body of the implant via mechanical/adhesive hold. In such an embodiment a microporous implant may be necessary. This exterior coating of hydrogel/active drug may be biodegradable and should be a highly concentrated but thin layer (high drug reservoir/low distance to travel) to obtain maximum rate of drug release via an erosion mechanism.


The amount of drug required to elicit effect can be determined by those skilled in the art, using conventional means. However, estimates of the amount of a drug which may be provided based on preliminary results which should not be considered limiting in any way on the device of the present invention are given below by way of example only.


Levonorgestrel


Currently, oral daily doses for levonorgestrel are 60 mcg. Using vaginal delivery analogy of 10% drug required compared to oral doses, daily myometrial doses would be 6 mcg for levonorgestrel


A mare feasible daily dose to enable drug delivery via a hydrogel would likely be 20 mcg for levonorgestrel (33% of oral dose)


Assuming 50% w/w of drug to hydrogel, the total weight of the drug/carrier layer could be in the range of 3 to 15 mg.


The body of the implant could accommodate 3, 6 or 12 month or longer doses.


Leuprolide


Currently, the daily dose for leuprolide is 125 mcg (intramuscular). Typical daily myometrial doses could be around 62 mcg for leuprolide (50% of intramuscular dose)


However in the absence of clinical data, it is impossible to estimate the clinical effectiveness of such doses of leuprolide.


Assuming 50% w/w of drug to hydrogel, the total weight of the drug/carrier layer would be in the range of 10 m to 45 mg.


The body of the implant could accommodate 3, 6 or 12 month or longer doses.


Piroxicam


Currently, oral daily doses for piroxicam are 10 to 40 mg. Using vaginal delivery analogy of 10% drug required compared to oral doses, a daily myometrial doses could be 3 mg for piroxicam. A more feasible daily dose to enable drug delivery via a hydrogel could be 300 mcg for piroxicam (1% of oral dose). However in the absence of clinical data, it is impossible to estimate the clinical effectiveness of such low doses of piroxicam.


Assuming 50% w/w of drug to hydrogel, the total weight of the drug/carrier layer would be around 50 to 220 mg.


The body of the implant could accommodate 3, 6, or 12 month or longer doses.


Levonorgestrel/Piroxicam


Currently, oral daily doses for levonorgestrel are 60 mcg, and piroxicam 10-40 mg. Using vaginal delivery analogy of 10% drug required compared to oral doses, daily myometrial doses could be 3 mg for piroxicam 6 mcg for levonorgestrel. A more feasible daily dose to enable drug delivery via a hydrogel (levonorgestrel dose as per Mirena coil dose) would be 300 mcg for piroxicam (1% of oral dose), 20 mcg for levonorgestrel (33% of oral dose). However in the absence of clinical data, it is impossible to estimate the clinical effectiveness of such low doses of piroxicam.


Assuming 50% w/w of drug to hydrogel, the total weight of the drug/carrier layer would be in the range of around 55 mg to 230 mg.


The body of the implant could accommodate 3, 6, 12 month or longer doses.


Levonorgestrel/Leuprolide


Currently, daily doses for levonorgestrel are 60 mcg (oral), and leuprolide 125 mcg (intramuscular). Using vaginal delivery analogy of 10% drug required compared to oral doses, daily myometrial doses could be 62.5 mcg for leuprolide and 6 mcg for levonorgestrel. A more feasible daily dose to enable drug delivery via a hydrogel would be 62.5 mcg for leuprolide (50% of intramuscular dose) and 20 mcg for levonorgestrel (33% of oral dose). However in the absence of clinical data, it is impossible to estimate the clinical effectiveness of such low doses of leuprolide.


Assuming 50% w/w of drug to hydrogel, the total weight of the drug/carrier layer could be in the range of around 14 mg to 60 mg.


The body of the implant could accommodate 3, 6, 12 month or longer doses.


Leuprolide/Tibolone


Currently, daily doses for leuprolide are 125 mcg (intramuscular), and tibolone 2.5 mg (oral). Using vaginal delivery analogy of 10% drug required compared to oral doses daily myometrial doses could be 62.5 mcg for leuprolide (50% of intramuscular dose) and 250 mcg for tibolone. However in the absence of clinical data, it is impossible to estimate the clinical effectiveness of such doses of leuprolide.


Assuming 50% w/w of drug to hydrogel, the total weight of the drug/carrier layer would be in the range of around 55 mg to 225 mg.


The body of the implant could accommodate 3, 6 or 12 month or longer doses.


Leuprolide/Piroxicam


Currently, daily doses for leuprolide are 125 mcg (intramuscular), and piroxicam 10-40 mg (oral). Using vaginal delivery analogy of 10% drug required compared to oral doses daily myometrial doses could be 62.5 mcg for leuprolide and 3 mg for piroxicam.


A more feasible daily dose to enable drug delivery via a hydrogel could be 62.5 mcg for leuprolide (50% of intramuscular dose) and 300 mcg for piroxicam (1% of oral dose). However in the absence of clinical data, it is impossible to estimate the clinical effectiveness of such doses of piroxicam and leuprolide.


Assuming 50% w/w of drug to hydrogel, the total weight of the drug/carrier layer would be in the range of around 65 mg to 261 mg respectively.


The body of the implant could accommodate 3, 6 or 12 month or longer doses.


Bacterial Vaginosis


Bacterial vaginosis, an abnormal colonisation of the vagina which may lead to vaginitis, is an inflammation which occurs in the vagina. It includes several strains of organism that cause bacterial vaginosis, yeast infections and trichomoniasis. Bacterial vaginosis occurs mostly during the reproductive years although women of all ages are susceptible. Typically infection affects the vagina, urethra, bladder and skin in the genital area.


Primary causes of bacterial vaginosis include an overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria and the Gardnerella organism. Although the healthy vagina includes a small amount of these bacteria and organisms, when the vaginal balance is disrupted by the overgrowth of these bacteria, another protective aerobic bacterium (lactobacilli) is unable to adequately perform its normal function. Lactobacilli normally provides a natural disinfectant (similar to hydrogen peroxide) which helps maintain the healthy and normal balance of microorganisms in the vagina. The vaginal anerobic to aerobic bacteria ratio is 1000 to 1, normal vaginal flora is 5 to 1 ratio. During vaginosis a change in pH of vaginal fluid also occurs.


Bacterial Vaginosis can cause a range of symptoms such as discharge. In addition, the change in pH of the vaginal fluid to more than 4.5 can also cause odour and some itching.


The medicament delivery device of the present invention may be used to deliver medicaments to restore normal vaginal bacteria by inhibiting anaerobic bacteria, but not the normal vaginal lactobacilli, in order to eliminate symptoms of discharge and odour.


In particular embodiments, one of which is illustrated in FIG. 2 and discussed above, the medicament delivery device has a body portion for insertion into the myometrium and a head portion which extends into the vaginal cavity. The body portion is preferably around 5 mm to 20 mm in length and the head portion is around 10 to 12 mm in width.


In this embodiment the medicament is contained or absorbed by or coated onto the head portion of the device such that it can be released over time into the vaginal cavity. Any suitable pharmaceutical means may be used to carry the drug and enable its release over time to the vaginal cavity.


Drugs which may be used to treat bacterial vaginosis include Flagyl (also known as Metronidazole), acidifiers to decrease pH to less than 5, less than 4.5, prebiotics, and probiotics. Other treatments include cleocin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone and tetracycline. Other drugs suitable for treating bacterial vaginosis such as pH regulators, suitable antibiotics and other drugs will be known to those skilled in the art.


The location of the implant in the smooth muscle myometrium of the cervix and/or part of the body of the smooth muscle myometrium of the uterus allows the implant to be easily inserted. During retention of the implant in the myometrium of the cervix, straightforward examination of the vaginal cavity 34 by a medical practitioner can verify that the implant is in its intended position in the myometrium. Whilst there is little chance of the implant becoming displaced, as the retrieval means, for example the cord or hook and in particular embodiments the head portion remains outside the myometrium, any such displacement can be easily observed.


Various improvements and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, as detailed above the body of the implant may be formed from absorbable polymers. This would avoid the need to remove the implant at a later date. Any suitable retrieval means can be provided on the implant to allow the implant to be moved into and out of the tissue of the myometrium or prostate.

Claims
  • 1. A system for delivery of medication in treatment of disorders of the pelvis, the system comprising: an implantable device including a first end opposite from a second end, with the first end of the implantable device insertable into tissue within the pelvis;a medicament applied to the implantable device;a retrieval string coupled to the second end of the implantable device; andan insertion tool including a shaft extending between a proximal end and a distal end, with a handle coupled to the proximal end of the insertion tool and the distal end of the insertion tool adapted to couple with the implantable device;wherein the handle includes a notch adapted to releasably secure the retrieval string.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first end of the implantable device has a first diameter and the second end of the implantable device has a head having a second diameter, with the second diameter larger than the first diameter.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the distal end of the insertion tool is insertable into the implantable device.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the distal end of the insertion tool forms a protrusion that is insertable into a depression on the second end of the implantable device.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the second end of the implantable device has a head forming a depression, and the distal end of the insertion tool is insertable into the depression of the head of the implantable device.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the medicament includes an anti-cholinergic medicament.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the medicament includes a calcium antagonist.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the medicament includes an agent for radiotherapy.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the medicament is selected to treat oestrogen dependent proliferative disorders of the pelvis.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the medicament is provided to treat an over active bladder with a controlled delivery of the medicament over a duration of time.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the medicament is selected from the group consisting of progestins, GnRH agonists/antagonists, NSAIDs, COX-II inhibitors, combined oral contraceptives, Danazol, smooth muscle relaxants, and aromatase inhibitors.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the implantable device is absorbable.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the medicament is selected from the group consisting of anti-infectives, antimicrobials, prebiotics, probiotics, acidifiers, antivirals, antibiotics, anti-allergenics, anti-inflammatories, anti-fungals, anticholinesterases, and chemotherapeutic agents.
  • 14. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a carrier applied to the implantable device;wherein the carrier is one of a hydrogel, a silicone based material, an elastomer, a proteinaceous material, a polyethylene glycol material, a carbohydrate material, and a polysaccharide carbohydrate material that provides controlled delivery of the medicament over a duration of time.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0307082.8 Mar 2003 GB national
US Referenced Citations (491)
Number Name Date Kind
1450101 Mathewson Mar 1923 A
2097018 Chamberlin Oct 1937 A
2427176 Aldeen Sep 1947 A
2738790 Todt, Sr. et al. Mar 1956 A
3054406 Usher Sep 1962 A
3124136 Usher Mar 1964 A
3126600 De Marre Mar 1964 A
3182662 Shirodkar May 1965 A
3311110 Singerman et al. Mar 1967 A
3384073 Van Winkle, Jr. May 1968 A
3472232 Pendleton Oct 1969 A
3580313 McKnight May 1971 A
3763860 Clarke Oct 1973 A
3789828 Schulte Feb 1974 A
3858783 Kapitanov et al. Jan 1975 A
3888975 Ramwell Jun 1975 A
3911911 Scommegna Oct 1975 A
3913179 Rhee Oct 1975 A
3913573 Gutnick Oct 1975 A
3916899 Theeuwes et al. Nov 1975 A
3924633 Cook et al. Dec 1975 A
3993058 Hoff Nov 1976 A
3995619 Glatzer Dec 1976 A
4019499 Fitzgerald Apr 1977 A
4037603 Wendorff Jul 1977 A
4128100 Wendorff Dec 1978 A
4172458 Pereyra Oct 1979 A
4233968 Shaw, Jr. Nov 1980 A
4235238 Ogiu et al. Nov 1980 A
4246660 Wevers Jan 1981 A
4409866 McBride Oct 1983 A
4441497 Paudler Apr 1984 A
4444933 Columbus et al. Apr 1984 A
4452245 Usher Jun 1984 A
4509516 Richmond Apr 1985 A
4632100 Somers et al. Dec 1986 A
4633873 Dumican et al. Jan 1987 A
4646731 Brower Mar 1987 A
4655221 Devereux Apr 1987 A
4769038 Bendavid et al. Sep 1988 A
4775380 Seedhom et al. Oct 1988 A
4784139 Demos Nov 1988 A
4799484 Smith et al. Jan 1989 A
4857041 Annis et al. Aug 1989 A
4865031 O'Keeffe Sep 1989 A
4873976 Schreiber Oct 1989 A
4911164 Roth Mar 1990 A
4920986 Biswas May 1990 A
4938760 Burton et al. Jul 1990 A
5004468 Atkinson Apr 1991 A
5013292 Lemay May 1991 A
5053043 Gottesman et al. Oct 1991 A
5085661 Moss Feb 1992 A
5112344 Petros May 1992 A
5123428 Schwarz Jun 1992 A
5123910 McIntosh Jun 1992 A
5149329 Richardson Sep 1992 A
5188636 Fedotov Feb 1993 A
5207694 Broome May 1993 A
5209756 Seedhom et al. May 1993 A
5219352 Atkinson Jun 1993 A
5234436 Eaton et al. Aug 1993 A
5250033 Evans et al. Oct 1993 A
5256133 Spitz Oct 1993 A
5259835 Clark et al. Nov 1993 A
5281237 Gimpelson Jan 1994 A
5306279 Atkinson Apr 1994 A
5328077 Lou Jul 1994 A
5336239 Gimpelson Aug 1994 A
5337736 Reddy Aug 1994 A
5342376 Ruff Aug 1994 A
5356432 Rutkow et al. Oct 1994 A
5362294 Seitzinger Nov 1994 A
5368595 Lewis Nov 1994 A
5383904 Totakura et al. Jan 1995 A
5386836 Biswas Feb 1995 A
5397353 Oliver et al. Mar 1995 A
5403328 Shallman Apr 1995 A
5413598 Moreland May 1995 A
5434146 Labrie et al. Jul 1995 A
5439467 Benderev et al. Aug 1995 A
5456711 Hudson Oct 1995 A
5473796 Fusillo Dec 1995 A
5474543 McKay Dec 1995 A
5486197 Le et al. Jan 1996 A
5507754 Green et al. Apr 1996 A
5507796 Hasson Apr 1996 A
5520700 Beyar et al. May 1996 A
5522896 Prescott Jun 1996 A
5544664 Benderev et al. Aug 1996 A
5549619 Peters et al. Aug 1996 A
5562685 Mollenauer et al. Oct 1996 A
5562689 Green et al. Oct 1996 A
5569273 Titone et al. Oct 1996 A
5571139 Jenkins, Jr. Nov 1996 A
5591163 Thompson Jan 1997 A
5611515 Benderev et al. Mar 1997 A
5628756 Barker, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5633286 Chen May 1997 A
5645568 Chervitz et al. Jul 1997 A
5647836 Blake, III et al. Jul 1997 A
5655270 Boisvert Aug 1997 A
5669935 Rosenman et al. Sep 1997 A
5683349 Makower et al. Nov 1997 A
5689860 Matoba et al. Nov 1997 A
5693072 McIntosh Dec 1997 A
5695525 Mulhauser et al. Dec 1997 A
5697931 Thompson Dec 1997 A
5697978 Sgro Dec 1997 A
5720766 Zang et al. Feb 1998 A
5749884 Benderev et al. May 1998 A
5766221 Benderev et al. Jun 1998 A
5774994 Stein et al. Jul 1998 A
5807403 Beyar et al. Sep 1998 A
5816258 Jervis Oct 1998 A
5830220 Wan et al. Nov 1998 A
5836314 Benderev et al. Nov 1998 A
5836315 Benderev et al. Nov 1998 A
5840011 Landgrebe et al. Nov 1998 A
5842478 Benderev et al. Dec 1998 A
5851229 Lentz et al. Dec 1998 A
5860425 Benderev et al. Jan 1999 A
5899909 Claren et al. May 1999 A
5904692 Steckel et al. May 1999 A
5919232 Chaffringeon et al. Jul 1999 A
5922026 Chin Jul 1999 A
5934283 Willem et al. Aug 1999 A
5935122 Fourkas et al. Aug 1999 A
5944732 Raulerson et al. Aug 1999 A
5954057 Li Sep 1999 A
5971967 Willard Oct 1999 A
5972000 Beyar et al. Oct 1999 A
5988171 Sohn et al. Nov 1999 A
5997554 Thompson Dec 1999 A
6005191 Tzeng et al. Dec 1999 A
6010447 Kardjian Jan 2000 A
6030393 Corlew Feb 2000 A
6031148 Hayes et al. Feb 2000 A
6039686 Kovac Mar 2000 A
6042534 Gellman et al. Mar 2000 A
6042536 Tihon et al. Mar 2000 A
6042583 Thompson et al. Mar 2000 A
6048306 Spielberg Apr 2000 A
6048351 Gordon et al. Apr 2000 A
6050937 Benderev Apr 2000 A
6053935 Brenneman et al. Apr 2000 A
6056688 Benderev et al. May 2000 A
6063094 Rosenberg May 2000 A
6068591 Bruckner et al. May 2000 A
6071290 Compton Jun 2000 A
6074341 Anderson et al. Jun 2000 A
6077216 Benderev et al. Jun 2000 A
6090116 D'Aversa et al. Jul 2000 A
6106545 Egan Aug 2000 A
6110101 Tihon et al. Aug 2000 A
6117067 Gil Vernet Sep 2000 A
6159207 Yoon Dec 2000 A
6162962 Hinsch et al. Dec 2000 A
6168611 Rizvi Jan 2001 B1
6174329 Callol et al. Jan 2001 B1
6190401 Green et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197036 Tripp et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200330 Benderev et al. Mar 2001 B1
6221005 Bruckner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221060 Willard Apr 2001 B1
6231496 Wilk et al. May 2001 B1
6245082 Gellman et al. Jun 2001 B1
6264676 Gellman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267772 Mulhauser et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273852 Lehe et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287316 Agarwal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292700 Morrison et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302840 Benderev Oct 2001 B1
6306079 Trabucco Oct 2001 B1
6319264 Tormala et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328686 Kovac Dec 2001 B1
6328744 Harari et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334446 Beyar Jan 2002 B1
6336731 Chien Jan 2002 B1
6352553 van der Burg et al. Mar 2002 B1
6355065 Gabbay Mar 2002 B1
6382214 Raz et al. May 2002 B1
6387041 Harari et al. May 2002 B1
6406423 Scetbon Jun 2002 B1
6406480 Beyar et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408656 Ory et al. Jun 2002 B1
6418930 Fowler Jul 2002 B1
6440154 Gellman et al. Aug 2002 B2
6443964 Ory et al. Sep 2002 B1
6461332 Mosel et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475139 Miller Nov 2002 B1
6478727 Scetbon Nov 2002 B2
6478791 Carter et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482214 Sidor, Jr. et al. Nov 2002 B1
6491703 Ulmsten Dec 2002 B1
6494887 Kaladelfos Dec 2002 B1
6494906 Owens Dec 2002 B1
6502578 Raz et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506190 Walshe Jan 2003 B1
6527802 Mayer Mar 2003 B1
6530943 Hoepffner et al. Mar 2003 B1
6544273 Harari et al. Apr 2003 B1
6575897 Ory et al. Jun 2003 B1
6575998 Beyar Jun 2003 B2
6582443 Cabak et al. Jun 2003 B2
6592515 Thierfelder et al. Jul 2003 B2
6596001 Stormby et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599235 Kovac Jul 2003 B2
6599318 Gabbay Jul 2003 B1
6599323 Melican et al. Jul 2003 B2
6612977 Staskin et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638210 Berger Oct 2003 B2
6638211 Suslian et al. Oct 2003 B2
6638284 Rousseau et al. Oct 2003 B1
6641524 Kovac Nov 2003 B2
6641525 Rocheleau et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652450 Neisz et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652595 Nicolo Nov 2003 B1
6666817 Li Dec 2003 B2
6669706 Schmitt et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669735 Pelissier Dec 2003 B1
6673010 Skiba et al. Jan 2004 B2
6675483 Bond et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679896 Gellman et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689047 Gellman Feb 2004 B2
6691711 Raz et al. Feb 2004 B2
6695855 Gaston Feb 2004 B1
6702827 Lund et al. Mar 2004 B1
6737371 Planck et al. May 2004 B1
6755781 Gellman Jun 2004 B2
6764474 Nielsen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6783554 Amara et al. Aug 2004 B2
6786861 Pretorius Sep 2004 B1
6830052 Carter et al. Dec 2004 B2
6860887 Frankle Mar 2005 B1
6878756 Cinelli et al. Apr 2005 B2
6884212 Thierfelder et al. Apr 2005 B2
6911003 Anderson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6932759 Kammerer et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936052 Gellman et al. Aug 2005 B2
6953428 Gellman et al. Oct 2005 B2
6960160 Browning Nov 2005 B2
7025063 Snitkin et al. Apr 2006 B2
7063716 Cunningham Jun 2006 B2
7070556 Anderson et al. Jul 2006 B2
7070558 Gellman et al. Jul 2006 B2
7087065 Ulmsten et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094199 Petros et al. Aug 2006 B2
7112171 Rocheleau et al. Sep 2006 B2
7112210 Ulmsten et al. Sep 2006 B2
7131943 Kammerer Nov 2006 B2
7131944 Jacquetin Nov 2006 B2
7140956 Korovin et al. Nov 2006 B1
7156858 Schuldt Hempe et al. Jan 2007 B2
7204802 De Leval Apr 2007 B2
7229404 Bouffier Jun 2007 B2
7288063 Petros et al. Oct 2007 B2
7290410 Meneghin et al. Nov 2007 B2
7297102 Smith et al. Nov 2007 B2
7326213 Benderev et al. Feb 2008 B2
7347812 Mellier Mar 2008 B2
7371245 Evans et al. May 2008 B2
7387634 Benderev Jun 2008 B2
7395822 Burton et al. Jul 2008 B1
7404819 Darios et al. Jul 2008 B1
7410460 Benderev Aug 2008 B2
7500945 Cox et al. Mar 2009 B2
7517313 Thierfelder et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527633 Rioux May 2009 B2
7559885 Merade et al. Jul 2009 B2
7594921 Browning Sep 2009 B2
7601118 Smith et al. Oct 2009 B2
7611454 De Leval Nov 2009 B2
7614258 Cherok et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621864 Suslian et al. Nov 2009 B2
7628156 Astani et al. Dec 2009 B2
7673631 Astani et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686760 Anderson et al. Mar 2010 B2
7691050 Gellman et al. Apr 2010 B2
7713188 Bouffier May 2010 B2
7722528 Arnal et al. May 2010 B2
7740576 Hodroff et al. Jun 2010 B2
7766926 Bosley, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
7789821 Browning Sep 2010 B2
7794385 Rosenblatt Sep 2010 B2
7815662 Spivey et al. Oct 2010 B2
7927342 Rioux Apr 2011 B2
7975698 Browning Jul 2011 B2
7981022 Gellman et al. Jul 2011 B2
8007430 Browning Aug 2011 B2
8016741 Weiser et al. Sep 2011 B2
8016743 Maroto Sep 2011 B2
8047983 Browning Nov 2011 B2
8092366 Evans Jan 2012 B2
8097007 Evans et al. Jan 2012 B2
8100924 Browning Jan 2012 B2
8118727 Browning Feb 2012 B2
8118728 Browning Feb 2012 B2
8123673 Browning Feb 2012 B2
8128554 Browning Mar 2012 B2
8157821 Browning Apr 2012 B2
8157822 Browning Apr 2012 B2
8162818 Browning Apr 2012 B2
8167785 Browning May 2012 B2
8182412 Browning May 2012 B2
8182413 Browning May 2012 B2
8215310 Browning Jul 2012 B2
8273011 Browning Sep 2012 B2
8449450 Browning May 2013 B2
8454492 Browning Jun 2013 B2
8469875 Suslian et al. Jun 2013 B2
8469877 Browning Jun 2013 B2
8512223 Browning Aug 2013 B2
8574148 Browning et al. Nov 2013 B2
8668635 Browning Mar 2014 B2
8709471 Browning Apr 2014 B2
8801596 Browning Aug 2014 B2
8821369 Browning Sep 2014 B2
8821370 Browning Sep 2014 B2
8852075 Browning Oct 2014 B2
9005222 Evans et al. Apr 2015 B2
9186489 Browning Nov 2015 B2
9345867 Browning May 2016 B2
20010000533 Kovac Apr 2001 A1
20010018549 Scetbon Aug 2001 A1
20010039423 Skiba et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049467 Lehe et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010049538 Trabucco Dec 2001 A1
20010051815 Esplin Dec 2001 A1
20010053916 Rioux Dec 2001 A1
20020005204 Benderev et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007222 Desai Jan 2002 A1
20020022841 Kovac Feb 2002 A1
20020028980 Thierfelder et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020042658 Tyagi Apr 2002 A1
20020049503 Milbocker Apr 2002 A1
20020052612 Schmitt et al. May 2002 A1
20020052653 Durgin May 2002 A1
20020052654 Darois et al. May 2002 A1
20020055748 Gellman et al. May 2002 A1
20020058959 Gellman May 2002 A1
20020068948 Stormby et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020072694 Snitkin et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077526 Kammerer et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078964 Kovac et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082619 Cabak et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020083949 James Jul 2002 A1
20020091298 Landgrebe Jul 2002 A1
20020091373 Berger Jul 2002 A1
20020099258 Staskin et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099259 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099260 Suslian et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103542 Bilbo Aug 2002 A1
20020107430 Neisz et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107525 Harari et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115906 Miller Aug 2002 A1
20020119177 Bowman et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128670 Ulmsten et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138025 Gellman et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147382 Neisz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151762 Rocheleau et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151909 Gellman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020151910 Gellman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156487 Gellman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156488 Gellman et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161382 Neisz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020183588 Fierro Dec 2002 A1
20020188169 Kammerer et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004395 Therin Jan 2003 A1
20030009181 Gellman et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023136 Raz et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023137 Gellman Jan 2003 A1
20030023138 Luscombe Jan 2003 A1
20030036676 Scetbon Feb 2003 A1
20030050530 Neisz et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065246 Inman et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030065402 Anderson et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069469 Li Apr 2003 A1
20030078468 Skiba et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030100954 Schuldt Hempe et al. May 2003 A1
20030130670 Anderson et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149440 Kammerer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030171644 Anderson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030176762 Kammerer Sep 2003 A1
20030176875 Anderson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030191360 Browning Oct 2003 A1
20030199732 Suslian et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212305 Anderson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220538 Jacquetin Nov 2003 A1
20040029478 Planck et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034373 Schuldt Hempe et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039453 Anderson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059356 Gingras Mar 2004 A1
20040097974 De Leval May 2004 A1
20040106847 Benderev Jun 2004 A1
20040144395 Evans et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172048 Browning Sep 2004 A1
20040231678 Fierro Nov 2004 A1
20040243166 Odermatt et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249240 Goldmann et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249373 Gronemeyer et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249397 Delorme et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249473 Delorme et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050000524 Cancel et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050004576 Benderev Jan 2005 A1
20050065486 Fattman Mar 2005 A1
20050080317 Merade Apr 2005 A1
20050107805 Bouffier et al. May 2005 A1
20050240076 Neisz et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050277806 Cristalli Dec 2005 A1
20050278037 Delorme et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283040 Greenhalgh Dec 2005 A1
20060015069 Evans et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025649 Smith et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060025783 Smith et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041185 Browning Feb 2006 A1
20060058578 Browning Mar 2006 A1
20060089524 Chu Apr 2006 A1
20060089525 Mamo et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060130848 Carey Jun 2006 A1
20060205995 Browning Sep 2006 A1
20060264698 Kondonis et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070015953 MacLean Jan 2007 A1
20070020311 Browning Jan 2007 A1
20070032695 Weiser Feb 2007 A1
20070032881 Browning Feb 2007 A1
20070059199 Labuschagne Mar 2007 A1
20070149555 Kase et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070219606 Moreci et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080021263 Escude et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080161837 Toso et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161850 Weisenburgh et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167518 Burton et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080196729 Browning Aug 2008 A1
20080200751 Browning Aug 2008 A1
20080281148 Evans et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090123522 Browning May 2009 A1
20090137862 Evans et al. May 2009 A1
20090171377 Intoccia et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090221868 Evans Sep 2009 A1
20090287229 Ogdahl Nov 2009 A1
20100022822 Walshe Jan 2010 A1
20100056856 Suslian et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100063351 Witzmann et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100113869 Goldman May 2010 A1
20100130814 Dubernard May 2010 A1
20100198002 O'Donnell Aug 2010 A1
20100222794 Browning Sep 2010 A1
20100222974 Nakamura et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256442 Ogdahl et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274074 Khamis et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100280308 Browning Nov 2010 A1
20100298630 Wignall Nov 2010 A1
20110021868 Browning Jan 2011 A1
20110034759 Ogdahl et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110105833 Gozzi et al. May 2011 A1
20110124954 Ogdahl et al. May 2011 A1
20110124956 Mujwid et al. May 2011 A1
20110201872 Browning Aug 2011 A1
20110230705 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110230708 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110230709 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237865 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237866 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237867 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237868 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237869 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237870 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237873 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237874 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237875 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237876 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237877 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237878 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110237879 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110238095 Browning Sep 2011 A1
20110245594 Browning Oct 2011 A1
20110282136 Browning Nov 2011 A1
20110319705 Browning Dec 2011 A1
20110319706 Browning Dec 2011 A1
20120083651 Browning Apr 2012 A1
20120116154 Evans et al. May 2012 A1
20120143000 Browning Jun 2012 A1
20120149977 Browning Jun 2012 A1
20120199133 Browning Aug 2012 A1
20140039244 Browning Feb 2014 A1
20140039247 Browning Feb 2014 A1
20140039248 Browning Feb 2014 A1
20140051917 Browning Feb 2014 A1
20140303429 Evans et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303430 Evans et al. Oct 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (148)
Number Date Country
2592617 Feb 2004 CA
2305815 Aug 1974 DE
4220283 Dec 1993 DE
4304353 Apr 1994 DE
10019604 Jun 2002 DE
10211360 Oct 2003 DE
0009072 Apr 1980 EP
0024781 Aug 1984 EP
0024780 Oct 1984 EP
0248544 Apr 1991 EP
0437481 Jul 1991 EP
0139286 Aug 1991 EP
0470308 Feb 1992 EP
0556313 Aug 1993 EP
0557964 Sep 1993 EP
0632999 Jan 1995 EP
0650703 May 1995 EP
0706778 Apr 1996 EP
0740925 Nov 1996 EP
0745351 Dec 1996 EP
0778749 Jun 1997 EP
0854691 Jul 1998 EP
0983033 Mar 2000 EP
1093758 Apr 2001 EP
0719527 Aug 2001 EP
1151722 Nov 2001 EP
1159921 Dec 2001 EP
0643945 Mar 2002 EP
1342454 Sep 2003 EP
1545285 Jun 2005 EP
1060714 Aug 2006 EP
1274370 Sep 2006 EP
1296614 Sep 2006 EP
1353598 Oct 2007 EP
0797962 Sep 2009 EP
1274370 Oct 1961 FR
2712177 May 1995 FR
2732582 Oct 1997 FR
2735015 Feb 1998 FR
2811218 Nov 2000 FR
2787990 Apr 2001 FR
0378288 Aug 1932 GB
2353220 Feb 2001 GB
4452180 Nov 2005 JP
2187251 Aug 2002 RU
2196518 Jan 2003 RU
1225547 Apr 1986 SU
1342486 Oct 1987 SU
1475607 Apr 1989 SU
WO9003766 Apr 1990 WO
WO9100714 Jan 1991 WO
WO9317635 Sep 1993 WO
WO9319678 Oct 1993 WO
WO9533454 Dec 1995 WO
WO9603091 Feb 1996 WO
WO9606567 Mar 1996 WO
WO9706567 Feb 1997 WO
WO9713465 Apr 1997 WO
WO9722310 Jun 1997 WO
WO9743982 Nov 1997 WO
WO9819606 May 1998 WO
WO9835606 Aug 1998 WO
WO9835616 Aug 1998 WO
WO9835632 Aug 1998 WO
WO9857590 Dec 1998 WO
WO9916381 Apr 1999 WO
WO9952450 Oct 1999 WO
WO9959477 Nov 1999 WO
WO0007520 Feb 2000 WO
WO0013601 Mar 2000 WO
WO0015141 Mar 2000 WO
0018325 Apr 2000 WO
WO0018319 Apr 2000 WO
0027304 May 2000 WO
WO0038784 Jul 2000 WO
WO0057812 Oct 2000 WO
0066030 Nov 2000 WO
WO0064370 Nov 2000 WO
WO0074594 Dec 2000 WO
WO0074613 Dec 2000 WO
WO0074633 Dec 2000 WO
WO0106951 Feb 2001 WO
WO0126581 Apr 2001 WO
WO0139670 Jun 2001 WO
WO0145589 Jun 2001 WO
0152750 Jul 2001 WO
WO0152729 Jul 2001 WO
WO0156499 Aug 2001 WO
WO0180773 Nov 2001 WO
WO0202031 Jan 2002 WO
0219946 Mar 2002 WO
0228315 Apr 2002 WO
WO0226108 Apr 2002 WO
WO0228312 Apr 2002 WO
WO0230293 Apr 2002 WO
WO0232284 Apr 2002 WO
WO0232346 Apr 2002 WO
0239914 May 2002 WO
WO0234124 May 2002 WO
WO0239890 May 2002 WO
02058562 Aug 2002 WO
02058563 Aug 2002 WO
02058564 Aug 2002 WO
02058565 Aug 2002 WO
02062237 Aug 2002 WO
02065922 Aug 2002 WO
02065923 Aug 2002 WO
WO02060371 Aug 2002 WO
WO02065921 Aug 2002 WO
WO02065944 Aug 2002 WO
02071931 Sep 2002 WO
WO02069781 Sep 2002 WO
WO02071953 Sep 2002 WO
WO02078548 Oct 2002 WO
WO02078552 Oct 2002 WO
WO02078568 Oct 2002 WO
WO02078571 Oct 2002 WO
02098322 Dec 2002 WO
WO02098340 Dec 2002 WO
WO03002027 Jan 2003 WO
03013369 Feb 2003 WO
WO03013392 Feb 2003 WO
WO03057074 Jul 2003 WO
WO03068107 Aug 2003 WO
03075792 Sep 2003 WO
WO03022260 Oct 2003 WO
WO03086205 Oct 2003 WO
03096928 Nov 2003 WO
03096930 Nov 2003 WO
WO03092546 Nov 2003 WO
WO03094781 Nov 2003 WO
WO2004002370 Jan 2004 WO
WO2004002379 Jan 2004 WO
WO2004004600 Jan 2004 WO
2004016196 Feb 2004 WO
WO2004012626 Feb 2004 WO
2004019786 Mar 2004 WO
2004012579 May 2004 WO
WO2004098461 Nov 2004 WO
WO2005018494 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005112842 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006015031 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006015042 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006136625 Dec 2006 WO
WO2007059199 May 2007 WO
WO2007149555 Dec 2007 WO
WO2008007086 Jan 2008 WO
WO2008018494 Feb 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (225)
Entry
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part III: Surgical Principles Deriving from the Theory,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:41-52.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part IV: Surgical Applications of the Theory—Development of the Intravaginal Sling Plasty (IVS) Procedure,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:53-54.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Pinch Test for Diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl.153):33-35.
Petros and Ulmsten. An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Supplement No. 153, 1993.
Petros and Ulmsten. An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl.153):7-31.
Petros and Ulmsten. Pregnancy Effects on the Intravaginal Sling Operation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence) :77-78, 1990.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation. An Ambulatory Procedure for Cure of Stress and Urge Incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 53-59, 1990.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS II—(with bilateral “tucks”). Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 61-67, 1993.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Free Graft Procedure for Cure of the Tethered Vagina Syndrome. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153: 85-87, 1997.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS IV—(with “double-breasted” unattached vaginal flap repair and “free” vaginal tapes). Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 73-79, 1993.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS VI—Further Development of the “Double-Breasted” Vaginal Flap Repair—Attached Flap. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 81-84, 1993.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Posterior Fornix Syndrome: A Multiple Symptom Complex of Pelvic Pain and Abnormal Urinary Symptoms Deriving from Laxity in the Posterior Fornix of Vagina. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 89-93, 1993.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Role of a Lax Posterior Vaginal Fornix in the Causation of Stress and Urgency Symptoms: A Preliminary Report. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 71-73, 1990.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Post Surgical Incontinence and I-Plasty Operation for Cure. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl.153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 63-67, 1990.
Petros and Ulmsten. The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl.153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence): 41-42, 1990.
Petros and Ulmsten. Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates From Within the Urethra, and Continence From Musculovaginal Closure. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 14:337-350, 1995.
Petros, Peter E., et al. The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-Ligament. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 69(Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence):43-51, 1990.
Petros. Development of Generic Models for Ambulatory Vaginal Surgery—A Preliminary Report. Int. Urogynecol. J., 9:19-27, 1998.
Plaintiff Coloplast ,A/S's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS.
Plaintiff Coloplast A/S's Answer to Defendant Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Counterclaims (Mar. 22, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS.
Plaintiff Coloplast A/S's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (Jul. 6, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV '10-227 BHS.
Plaintiff's Reply to Counterclaim (Mar. 30, 2004) Mentor Corporation v. American Medical Systems, Inc. (Civ. No. 04-1000).
Product Monograph for Aris Transobturator Tape for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, 2004, 40 pages.
Rackley, Raymond R., et al. Tension-free Vaginal Tape and Percutaneous Vaginal Tape Sling Procedures. Techniques in Urology, 7(2):90-100, 2001.
Rackley, Raymond. Synthetic Slings: Five Steps for Successful Placement—Follow These Steps to Insert Transvaginal/Percutaneous Slings Using Vaginal Approach Alone. Urology Times, 28:46-49, 2000.
Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, 2001.
Raz, Shlomo, et al. The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension: Results in 206 Patients. The Journal of Urology: Urological Neurology and Urodynamics, 148:845-850, 1992.
Raz, Shlomo. Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence. Urology, 17(1):82-85, 1981.
Richardson, David A., et al. Delayed Reaction to the Dacron Buttress Used in Urethropexy. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 29(9):689-692, 1984.
Ridley, John H. Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95(5):714-721, 1966.
Sand et al., “Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology vol. 184, Issue 7, pp. 1357-1364, Jun. 2001.
Schettini, M. et al., “Abdominal sacral colpopexy with prolene mesh,” Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct (1999) 10(5): 259-299.
Schumpelick, V. et at., “Minimized polypropylene mesh for preperitoneal net plasty (PNP) of incisional hernias,” Chirurg 70:422-430 (1999).
Shaw, W., “An Operation for the Treatment of Stress Incontinence,” Br. Med. J. 1949:1070-1073.
Sheiner et al., “An unusual complication of obturator foramen arterial bypass,” J. Cardiovasc. Surg., 1969, 10(4):324-328.
Sirls and Leach, “Use of Fascia Lata for Pubovaginal Sling,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.). W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 32, pp. 376-381.
Sloan and Barwin, “Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings,” J. Urol., 1973, 110:533-536.
Solyx™ SIS System, The Carrier Tip That Allows for Advanced Control, (Accessed: Feb. 28, 2011).
Sottner et al. “New Single-Incision Sling System MiniArc™ in treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence” Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika [Online] 2010, 75(2), pp. 101-104.
Spencer et al., “A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck with Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1987, 137:411-415.
Spinosa, JP et al., Transobturator surgery for female stress incontinence: a comparative anatomical study of outside-in vs. inside-out techniques, BJU Intl., 100(5), pp. 1097-1102 (Nov. 2007).
Stamey, “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females,” Annals of Surgery, 1980, 192(4):465-471.
Stanton, Stuart L. Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women. The Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38(3):348-351, 1990.
Staskin et al., “The Gore-tex sling procedure for female sphincteric incontinence: indications, technique, and results,” World J. Urol., 1997, 15:295-299.
Stothers et al., “Anterior Vaginal Wall Sling,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 35, pp. 395-398.
Supplemental European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 03751825, Jun. 19, 2009, 5 pages.
Surgimesh Sling Treatment of Incontinence http://www.aspide.com Mar. 4, 2011.
Ulmsten and Petros, “Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1995, 29:75-82.
Ulmsten et al., “A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence,” Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1999, 106:345-350.
Ulmsten et al., “An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1996, 7:81-86.
Abdel-fattah, Mohamed et al. Evaluation of transobturator tapes (E-TOT) study: randomised prospective single-blinded study comparing inside-out vs. outside-in transobturator tapes in management of urodynamic stress incontinence: Short term outcomes, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2009).
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Abutment System and Method, Mar. 31, 2011, 10 pages.
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Adjustable, Mar. 4, 2011, 10 pages.
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Fiber Entanglement, Mar. 4, 2011, 8 pages.
Accelerated Examination Search for Surgical Implant—Introducer, Mar. 31, 2011, 12 pages.
Adjustable Mini-Sling, Just-Swing SVS “Secured Vaginal Sling”, Polypropylene, Mar. 2010.
Ajust Adjustable Single-Incision Sling, http://www.bardnordic.com, Mar. 1, 2011.
Ajust(TM) Adjustable Single-Incision Sling, retrieved from www.bardnordic.com/main/product.asp?sectionTypeId=2&section, accessed Mar. 1, 2011, 1 page.
Aldridge, “Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1942, 44:398-411.
Amended Answer and Counterclaim (Mar. 30, 2004) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation, Civ. No. 03-5759.
American Heritage Dictionary, 2nd College Edition (1991).
AMS's Reply to Mentor's Counterclaim (Apr. 5, 2004) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation, Civ. No. 03-CV-5759.
Answer and Counterclaim (Mar. 15, 2004) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation, Civ. No. 03-5759.
Answer and Counterclaim of American Medical Systems, Inc. (Mar. 11, 2004) Mentor Corporation v. American Medical Systems, Inc., Civ. Case No. 04-1000 DWF/SRN.
Araki et al., “The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Suspension of the Vesical Neck,” J. Urol., 1990, 144:319-323.
Asmussen and Ulmsten, “Simultaneous Urethro-Cystometry with a New Technique,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1976, 10:7-11.
Beck and McCormick, “Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence with Anterior Colporrhaphy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982, 59(3):271-274.
Benderev, “A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System,” J. Urol., 1994, 152:2316-2320.
Benderev, “Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension,” Urology, 1992, 40(5):409-418.
Bergman and Elia, “Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: Five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1995, 173:66-71.
BioArc SP Sling Kit, www.AmericanMedicalSystems.com, 2006.
BioArc(R) SP Sling Kit: 12 Step Procedure, American Medical Systems Inc. Online Brochure 2006, 2 pages.
Blaivas and Jacobs, “Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1991, 145:1214-1218.
Blaivas and Salinas, “Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment,” American College of Surgeons Surgical Forum, 1984, 70.sup.th Annual Clinical Congress, San Francisco, CA, vol. XXXV, pp. 473-474.
Botros, Cystocele and Rectocele Repair: More Success With Mesh? Jun. 2006.
Bryans, “Marlex gauze hammock sling operation with Coopers ligament attachment in the management of recurrent urinary stress incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1979, 133(3):292-294.
Burch, “Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper's ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1961, 81(2):281-290.
Canepa, G. et al., “Horseshoe-shaped Marlex mesh for the treatment of pelvic floor prolapse,” European Urology (Jan. 2001) 39 (Supl 2): 23-27.
Priority document for GB Application No. 0025068.8, filed Oct. 12, 2000, 38 pages.
Priority document for GB Application No. 0208359.0, filed Apr. 11, 2002, 50 pages.
Priority document for GB Application No. 0411360.1, filed May 21, 2004, 31 pages.
Chen, Biologic Grafts and Synthetic Meshes in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Jun. 2007.
Choe and Staskin, “Gore-Tex Patch Sling: 7 Years Later,” Urology, 1999, 54:641-646.
Chopra et al., “Technique of Rectangular Fascial Sling,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 34, pp. 392-394.
Churchill's Medical Dictionary (1989).
Complaint and Jury Demand (Feb. 8, 2010), Coloplast A/S v. Mpathy Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-206.
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Oct. 28, 2003) American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Mentor Corporation.
Complaint for Patent Infringement (Feb. 20, 2004) Mentor Corporation v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
Complaint for Patent Infringement and Exhibits (Feb. 8, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS.
Cook, Urogynecology, Product Technical Datasheet and Order form, 1996.
D. Elliott Declaration and Attachment 1 (Jan. 5, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS.
Dargent, D. et al., Pose d'un ruban sous uretral oblique par voie obturatrice dans le traitement de L'incontinence urinary feminine [English “Insertion of a transobturator oblique suburethral sling in the treatment of female urinary incontinence”], Gynecol. Obstet. Ferril. 14, pp. 576-582 (2002) [including English translation at the beginning of document].
Das and Palmer, “Laparoscopic Colpo-Suspension,” J. Urol., 1995, 154:1119-1121.
de Leval, J., “Novel Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Continence: Transobturator Vaginal Tape Inside-Out,” European Urology, 2003, 44:724-730.
DeBord, James R., (1998), “The Historical Development of Prosthetics in Hernia Surgery,” Surgical Clinics of North America, 78(6): 973-1006.
Declaration of Dr. George D. Webster in Support of Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Briefing on Claim Construction and Exhibits for Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS, signed Jan. 5, 2011.
Declaration of Jeya Paul and Attachment 1 (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS.
Declaration of Marc Belloli in Support of GMD's Opening Claim Construction Brief and Exhibits A-J (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV 10-227 BHS.
Decter, “Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Learned,” J. Urol., 1993, 150:683-686.
Delmore, E. et al., La bandelette trans-obturatrice: Un procede mini-invasif pour traiter l'incontinence urinaire d'effort de la femme, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, pp. 1306-1313 (2001) [including English translation at the beginning of document].
deTayrac, et al. Prolapse repair by vaginal route using . . . Int. Urogynecol. J. (published online May 13, 2006).
Dwyer, Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Aug. 2004.
Enzelsberger et al., “Urodynamic and Radiologic Parameters Before and After Loop Surgery for Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69:51-54.
Eriksen et al., “Long-Term Effectiveness of the Burch Colposuspension in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69:45-50.
Falconer et al., “Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinent Women,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1996, 7:133-137.
Falconer et al., “Influence of Different Sling Materials on Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 2001, (Suppl. 2):S19-S23.
Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Answer to Complaint and Counterclaims (Mar. 1, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS.
Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Non, Infringement and Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Document Production (Aug. 9, 2010) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV-I0-227 BHS.
Generic Medical Devices, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Jan. 10, 2011) Coloplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS.
Gilja et al., “A Modified Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Operation (Transvaginal Burch),” J. Urol., 1995, 153:1455-1457.
Gittes and Loughlin, “No-Incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1987, 138:568-570.
Gruss, “The Obturator Bypass. Indications. Techniques. Outcomes,” Chirurgie, 1971, 97:220-226.
Guido and Moore, “The Surgeon At Work. Obturator Bypass Technique,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1969, pp. 1307-1315.
Handa et al., “Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 88:1045-1049.
Hardiman, et al. Cystocele repair using polypropylene mesh. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 107: 825-26 (2000).
Henriksson and Ulmsten, “A urodynamic evaluation of the effects of abdominal urethrocystopexy and vaginal sling urethroplasty in women with stress incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1978, 131:77-82.
Hodgkinson and Kelly, “Urinary Stress Incontinence in the Female. III. Round-ligament technique for retropubic suspension of the urethra,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1957, 10:493-499.
Hohenfellner and Petri, “Sling Procedures,” Surgery of Female Incontinence, 2nd edition, SpringerVeriag, pp. 105-113, 1986.
Holschneider et al., “The Modified Pereyra Procedure in Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 15-Year Review,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1994, 83:573-578.
Horbach et al., “A Suburethral Sling Procedure with Polytetrafluoroethylene for the Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence in Patients with Low Urethral Closure Pressure,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1988, 71:648-652.
Horbach, “Suburethral Sling Procedures,” Urogynecology and Urodynamics—Theory and Practice, 1996, Williams & Wilkins, pp. 569-579.
Ingelman-Sundberg and Ulmsten, “Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Contr. Gynec. Obstet., 1983, 10:51-69.
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in PCT/GB01/04554, completed Nov. 22, 2002, 6 pages.
International Preliminary Examination Report issued in PCT/GB2002/001234, completed Jul. 1, 2003, 18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/GB2004/001390, mailed Sep. 3, 2004, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US03/24212, mailed May 28, 2004, 11 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/GB2009/050174, mailed Jun. 24, 2009.
International Search Report issued in PCT/GB01/04554, mailed Jan. 29, 2002, 3 pages.
International Search Report issued in PCT/GB2002/01234 mailed Jun. 5, 2002, 3 pages.
International Search Report issued in PCT/GB2007/002589, mailed Jan. 22, 2008, 5 pages.
Jacquetin, Bernard, “2. Utilisation du “TVT” dans la chirurgie de l'incontinence urinaire feminine”, J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 29: 242-47 (2000).
Jeffcoate, “The Results of the Aldridge Sling Operation for Stress Incontinence,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, 1956, 63:36-39.
Jeter, “The Social Impact of Urinary Incontinence,” Female Urology, Raz (ed.), W. B. Saunders Company, 1996, Chapter 7, pp. 80-86.
Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 132 and Appendix A (Nov. 15, 2010) Coioplast A/S, v. Generic Medical Devices, Inc., Court File No. CV10-227 BHS.
Just-Swing(R) Adjustable mine-sling, Textile Hi-Tec Online Brochure 2010, 4 pages.
Karram and Bhatia, “Patch Procedure: Modified Transvaginal Fascia Lata Sling for Recurrent or Severe Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Obstet Gynecol., 1990, 75:461-463.
Kennelly et al. “Prospective Evaluation of a Single Incision Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence” The Journal of Urology [Online] 2010, 184, pp. 604-609.
Kerdiles et al., “Bypass via the Obturator Foramen in Reconstructive Arterial Surgery of the Lower Extremities,” Ann. Chir. Thorac. Cardio-Vasc., 1974, 13(4):335-341.
Kerr and Staskin, “The Use of Artificial Material for Sling Surgery in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 33, pp. 382-391.
Kersey, “The gauze hammock sling operation in the treatment of stress incontinence,” Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1983, 90:945-949.
Klinge et al., “Functional and Morphological Evaluation of a Low-Weight, Monofilament Polypropylene Mesh for Hernia Repair,” Journal of Biomedical Material Research, Jan. 24, 2002, pp. 129-137.
Klinge, U. et al., “Influence of polyglactin-coating on functional and morphological parameters of polypropylene-mesh modifications for abnormal wall repair,” Biomaterials 20 (1999), pp. 613-623.
Klinge, U. et al., “Modified Mesh for Hernia Repair that is Adapted to the Physiology of the Abdominal Wall,” Eur J Surg 164:951-960 (1998).
Klinge, U. et al., “Pathophysiology of the abdominal wall,” Der Chirurg, (1996),67: 229-233.
Klosterhalfen, B, et al., “Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair,” Biomaterials 19:2235-2246 (1998).
Klosterhalfen, B. et al., “Morphological correlation of the functional mechanics of the abdominal wall after mesh implantation,” Langenbecks Arch Chir 382:87-94 (1997).
Klutke et al., “The Anatomy of Stress Incontinence: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Female Bladder Neck and Urethra,” J. Urol., 1990, 143:563-566.
Klutke et al., “Transvaginal Bladder Neck Suspension to Cooper's Ligament: A Modified Pereyra Procedure,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1996, 88:294-297.
Korda et al., “Experience with Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontinence,” Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1989, 29:150-154.
Kovac and Cruikshank. Pubic bone suburethral stabilization sling: a long-term cure for SUI? Contemporary OB/GYN: Surgical Techniques, 43(2):52-76, 1998.
Kovac, R. S. Follow-Up of the Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence (Kovac Procedure). Journal of Pelvic Surgery, 5(3): 156-160, 1999.
Kovac, R., et. al. Pubic Bone Suburethral Stablization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence. Obstetrics & Genecology: Instruments & Methods, 89(4): 624-627, Apr. 1997.
Lazarevski, M.B., Suburethral Duplication of the Vaginal Wall—An Original Operation for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women, 6 Int'l Urogynecol. J. 73-79 (1995).
Leach et al., “Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel Summary Report on Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1997, 158:875-880.
Leach, “Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension,” Urology, 1988, 31(5):388-390.
Lichtenstein et al., “The Tension-Free Hernioplasty,” Am. J. Surgery, 1989, 157:188-193.
Lipton, S. and Estrin, J., “A Biomechanical Study of the Aponeurotic Iguinal Hernia Repair,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Jun. 1994, vol. 178, pp. 595-599.
Loughlin et al., “Review of an 8-Year Experience with Modifications of Endoscopic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1990, 143:44-45.
Maher, Surgical Management of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: An Evidence Based Literature Review, 2006.
Mahoney and Whelan, “Use of Obturator Foramen in Iliofemoral Artery Grafting: Case Reports,” Annals of Surgery, 1966, 163(2):215-220.
Marshall et al., “The Correction of Stress Incontinence by Simple Vesicourethral Suspension,” J. Urol., 2002, 168:1326-1331.
McGuire and Gormley, “Abdominal Fascial Slings,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 31, pp. 369-375.
McGuire and Lytton, “Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence,” J. Urol., 1978, 119:82-84.
McGuire et al., “Experience with Pubovaginal Slings for Urinary Incontinence at the University of Michigan,” J. Urol., 1987, 138:525-526.
McGuire, “Abdominal Procedures for Stress Incontinence,” Urologic Clinics of North America, 1985, 12(2):285-290.
McIndoe et al., “The Aldridge Sling Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1987, 27:238-239.
McKiel, Jr. et al., “Marshall-Marchetti Procedure: Modification,” J. Urol., 1966, 96:737-739.
Migliari, R. et al., “Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Repair for Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse,” European Urology (2000) 38(2): 151-155.
Miklos, Mini Sling Incontinence Treatment—Vagina Plastic Surgery, http://www.miklosandmoore.com/mini—sling.php, Feb. 28, 2011.
MiniArc Single-Incision Sling http://www.americanmedicalsystems.com Mar. 4, 2011.
Moir, “The Gauze-Hammock Operation,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 1968, 75(1):1-9.
Monseur, J., Anatomie Chirurgicale: Les Ligaments Du Perinee Feminin, Sep. 4, 2008.
Moore et al. “Single-Center Retrospective Study of the Technique, Safety, and 12 Month Efficacy or the MiniArc™ Single Incision Sling: A New Minimally Invasive Procedure for Treatment of Female SUI” [Online] 2009, 18, pp. 175-181.
Morgan et al., “The Marlex sling operation for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: A 16-year review,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1985, 151:224-226.
Morgan, “A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1970, 106(3):369-376.
Narik and Palmrich, “A simplified sling operation suitable for routine use,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1962, 84:400-405.
Nichols, “The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-Hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1973, 41(1):88-93.
Nicita, Giulio, (1998), “A New Operation for Genitourinary Prolapse,” The Journal of Urology, 160:741-745.
Nickel et al., “Evaluation of a Transpelvic Sling Procedure With and Without Colpolsuspension for Treatment of Female Dogs With Refractory Urethral Sphincter Mechanism Incompetence,” Veterinary Surgery, 1998, 27:94-104.
Norris et al., “Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach,” J. Endocrinology, 1996, 10(3):227-230.
Novak, “Abdonomovaginal Techniques,” Gynecological Surgical Technique, 1977, Piccin Editore, Padua, 5 pages.
O'Donnell, “Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and McGuire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence,” J. Arkansas Medical Society, 1992, 88(8):389.
Order dismissing cases (Sep. 16, 2004) Civ. No. 03-5759 and Civ. No. 04-1000.
Parker, MC and Phillips, RK, “Repair of rectocoele using Marlex mesh,” Ann R Coll Surg Engl (May 1993) 75(3):193-194.
Parra and Shaker, “Experience with a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence,” British Journal of Urology, 1990, 66:615-617.
Pelosi II and Pelosi III, “New transobturator sling reduces risk of injury,” OBG Management, 2003, pp. 17-37.
Pelosi III and Pelosi. Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques: 9(1): 45-50, 1999.
Penson and Raz, “Why Anti-incontinence Surgery Succeeds or Fails,” Female Urology, 1996, Raz (ed.), W.B. Saunders Company, Chapter 41, pp. 435-442.
Pereyra et al., “Pubourethral Supports in Perspective: Modified Pereyra Procedure for Urinary Incontinence,” Obstet Gynecol., 1982, 59:643-648.
Petros and Konsky, “Anchoring the midurethra restores bladder-neck anatomy and continence,” The Lancet, 1999, 354:997-998.
Petros and Ulmsten, “An analysis of rapid pad testing and the history for the diagnosis of stress incontinence,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1992, 71:529-536.
Petros and Ulmsten, “An Anatomical Basis for Success and Failure of Female Incontinence Surgery,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, (Suppl. 153):55-60.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Bladder Instability in Women: A Premature Activation of the Micturition Reflex,” Neurourology and Urodynamics, 1993, 12:235-239.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Cough Transmission Ratio: An Indicator of Suburethral Vaginal Wall Tension Rather than Urethral Closure?” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153):37-38.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Cure of Stress Incontinence by Repair of External Anal Sphincter,” Acta. Obstet. Gynecol Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153):75.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Cure of Urge Incontinence by the Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153)61-62.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS III—(with midline “tuck”),” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., Suppl. 153 An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence: 69-71 , 1993.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Non Stress Non Urge Female Urinary Incontinence—Diagnosis and Cure: A Preliminary Report,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1990, 69(Suppl. 153):69-70.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part I: Theoretical, Morphological, Radiographical Correlations and Clinical Perspective,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:5-28.
Petros and Ulmsten, “Part II:The Biomechanics of Vaginal Tissue and supporting Ligaments with Special Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1993, Suppl. 153:29-40.
Ulmsten et al., “Different Biochemical Composition of Connective Tissue in Continent and Stress Incontinent Women,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1987, 66:455-457.
Ulmsten et al., “The unstable female urethra,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1982, 144:93-97.
Ulmsten, “Female Urinary Incontinence—A Symptom, Not a Urodynamic Disease. Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1995, 6:2-3.
Ulstem et al., “A Multicenter Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Int. Urogynecol. J., 1998, 9:210-213.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,994, filed Jun. 1, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/327,160, filed Oct. 4, 2001.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/106,086, filed Mar. 25, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/199,061, filed Aug. 8, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/279,794, filed Mar. 29, 2001.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/302,929, filed Jul. 3, 2001.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/307,836, filed Jul. 25, 2001.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/322,309, filed Sep. 14, 2001.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/362,806, filed Mar. 7, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/380,797, filed May 14, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/393,969, filed Jul. 5, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/402,007, filed Aug. 8, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/414,865, filed Sep. 30, 2002.
Webster and Kreder, “Voiding Dysfunction Following Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management,” J. Urol., 1990, 144:670-673.
Weidemann, Small Intestinal Submucosa for Pubourethral Sling Suspension for the Treatment of Stress Incontinence: First Histopathological Results in Humans, Jul. 2004.
Winter, “Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women,” Urology, 1982, 20(4):408-411.
Woodside and Borden, “Suprapubic Endoscopic Vesical Neck Suspension for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Myelodysplastic Girls,” J. Urol., 1986, 135:97-99.
Written Opinion for PCT/GB2009/050174, mailed Jun. 24, 2009.
Written Opionion issued in PCT/GB2007/002589, mailed Jan. 22, 2008, 5 pages.
Zacharin and Hamilton, “Pulsion Enterocele: Long-Term Results of an Abdominoperineal Technique,” Obstet. Gynecol., 1980, 55(2):141-148.
Zacharin, “The suspensory mechanism of the female urethra,” J. Anat., 1963, 97(3):423-427.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160228620 A1 Aug 2016 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 14882458 Oct 2015 US
Child 15131043 US
Parent 14201962 Mar 2014 US
Child 14882458 US
Parent 12246263 Oct 2008 US
Child 14201962 US
Parent 10550699 US
Child 12246263 US