1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention concerns safety systems for operating automobiles and, more particularly, to such a system that detects the presence of a person in a closed trunk and releases the person under safe operational conditions.
2. Description of the Related Art
There have been well publicized reports of young children inadvertently locking themselves in the trunk of a vehicle, such as an automobile. Tragically, children can die under such circumstances, typically as a result of heat prostration while trapped in the sealed trunk.
It has been suggested that a trapped person could actuate an inside release mechanism to open the trunk. However, it is not certain that a young child would understand how to operate such a mechanism and it is therefore possible that the child would not be able to free himself by this means. There is therefore a need for a system that detects the presence of a person, particularly a small child, within a trunk and signals the need to open the trunk. It would also be advantageous for such a system to automatically trigger a trunk to open and release the trapped person when it is safe to do so, for example when the vehicle is stopped.
There is therefore a great need for an automatic trunk safety system. The apparatus and system of the invention has been developed to meet this need with simple, relatively low cost and reliable components that are easily integrated with the electronic control systems of existing vehicles. The above-mentioned features and other features of the invention will become apparent from a review of the following drawings, specification and claims.
One embodiment of the apparatus and system of the invention includes a sensor that detects CO2 that is exhaled by a person trapped in the closed trunk of a vehicle. A microprocessor compares the level of CO2 detected in the trunk to a baseline level of CO2 that was measured the last time the trunk was opened. If excessive CO2 is detected, the microprocessor determines the operational state of the vehicle and takes programmed steps to provide an alarm and to automatically open the trunk if the vehicle is not moving.
Other embodiments of the invention can use infrared sensors or electrostatic (i.e., capacitive) sensors to detect a person in the trunk. Systems with such sensors would also operate automatically to provide an alarm and to open the trunk under safe operational conditions.
In the drawings, elements are not necessarily drawn to scale, and the same reference numbers through several views designate the same or similar elements.
CO2 sensors are commercially available. A preferred sensor is sold by Figaro USA, Inc. of Glenview, Ill. with the model designation TGS4160. This solid electrolyte sensor generates an output voltage on a line 5 that corresponds to the level of detected CO2. The sensor includes a heater element 7 that must be energized in initial operation to heat the sensor to a specific operational temperature. The sensor therefore requires some initial time, for example, about 60 seconds, to stabilize before it can make a reliable CO2 reading. A thermistor 8 senses the temperature of the sensor and applies a corresponding voltage to a microcontroller 15 that, as an example, may be a model 68705P6A device which is commercially available from Motorola. The output voltage of the sensor is applied to the plus input of a difference operational amplifier 9 that also receives at its minus input 11 a reference voltage from the microcontroller 15. The operational amplifier 9 generates an output voltage on line 12 that corresponds to the difference between the voltage at its plus and minus inputs.
In initial operation, the reference voltage at 11 from the microcontroller is zero and the operational amplifier 9 generates a voltage at 12 that corresponds to the ambient concentration of CO2 in the trunk. The voltage corresponding to this ambient or baseline CO2 concentration is amplified within the microcontroller, temperature compensated, and applied at 11 as a pulse width modulated signal with a duty cycle that is adjusted to provide a reference voltage that corresponds to the background CO2 in the trunk.
If a person is thereafter trapped in the trunk, the level of CO2 will gradually rise above the background level. As the concentration of CO2 in the trunk rises, the voltage on the line 5 increases and the amplifier 9 generates a voltage that corresponds to the difference between the increased voltage on the line 5 and the background reference voltage on the line 11. The output of the amplifier at 12 therefore corresponds to the relative increase in the concentration of CO2 from the baseline. The “delta” voltage corresponding to the change in the concentration of CO2 is applied to the microcontroller and, if a specified magnitude of this voltage, for example 1 volt, is maintained for a specified time, for example 30 seconds, the microcontroller registers an alarm. The alarm magnitude of CO2 may be set to correspond to the respiration of the lowest weight person within the parameters of the system.
The microcontroller 15 receives vehicle status signals and transmits control signals over a serial bus 14, through a serial data interface 16 that may operate with the J1850 or Controller Area Network protocols as an example. Other protocols could also be used.
With reference to
The serial bus communicates with the instrument cluster electronic control unit 26 which receives a signal from the manual trunk release switch 24 and controls a CO2 panel alarm lamp and/or audio alarm 25. An engine control module 29 monitors the operational state of the ignition key switch 27 and interacts in a known manner with an automatic braking system 34 that connects with a high-speed motion control bus 28 and receives signals from wheel speed sensors 30 that indicate whether the vehicle is moving. A body control computer 48 controls a relay 45 that operates the vehicle horn and lights and responds to a remote keyless entry system 42 in a known manner. A radio frequency data module 53 can be actuated to send radio alarm signals to a remote security station via a satellite communication system 51 in a known manner. A heating, ventilation and airconditioning module 56 operates a vent fan 54 in a known manner. The fan could be disposed to vent the trunk, for example, in response to a CO2 alarm. A known plug-in service diagnostic tool 70, other known vehicle control modules 68 and the headlights 64 are connected and operated on the serial data bus 14 in a known manner. All of the apparatus on the serial bus is monitored and controlled through the microcontroller 15 that also controls the operation of the CO2 detection system. If necessary, the microcontroller could be implemented with flash memory to facilitate program changes in the field.
As an alternative to the use of a serial data bus to send and receive vehicle control signals, the microcontroller 15 could be directly connected to send and receive these signals using a dedicated wire for each signal. In such a system, an ignition on signal from the ignition key switch 27 would connect directly to the microcontroller 15, rather than indirectly through the engine control ECU 29 and a serial data bus 14. Likewise, wheel speed sensors 30, trunk release switch 24, audio alarm or lamp 25, headlights 64, horn relay 45, trunk vent fan 54, and any other such vehicle control apparatus would connect directly to the microcontroller, rather than through associated modules and a serial data bus.
With reference to
The microcontroller checks the condition of the trunk and seats at 37 by interrogating the switches 18, 20, and 21. If the switches do not close within a predefined delay time, for example several minutes, the microcontroller is put to sleep to await activation by closing the trunk or latching the seats. When activated, the baseline CO2 is acquired and stored, a timer is set and, if necessary, the sensor is warmed up. The concentration of CO2 in the trunk is measured at 39 during a predefined time-out interval of, for example several minutes. If an increase in the level of CO2 is detected in an amount that would be exhaled by a human being, the “trunk occupied” condition is triggered at 43. The system is put to sleep if the timer times out at 44.
Experimentation and investigation have indicated that healthy human beings generally exhale CO2 in amounts proportional to their body weight. Thus, for example, a 180 pound adult would exhale about 0.3 liters of CO2 per minute, a toddler of 20 pounds would exhale about 0.033 liters of CO2 per minute and an infant of 7 pounds would exhale about 0.012 liters of CO2 per minute. The microcontroller 15 is programmed to measure the increase in CO2 within the trunk over time in relation to the measured baseline CO2 and make a determination that the increasing CO2 results from the respiration of a human being.
As an initial approximation, if the largest trunk contains about 566 liters of air, it has been determined that the CO2 sensor will detect respiration at about 530 PPM (parts per million) per minute for an adult, 59 PPM per minute for a toddler and about 21 PPM per minute for an infant. This increase in measured CO2 over a reasonable time, for example up to several minutes, distinguishes the respiration of a human being from expected changes in ambient CO2. The detection of a gradual increase in CO2 also serves to distinguish an abrupt increase in CO2 that might result if a person intentionally injects CO2 into the trunk in an effort to confuse the CO2 detection system. As an example, it has been found that human respiration can be distinguished by measuring a predetermined change in the output voltage of the operational amplifier 9 of
With reference to
If the level of CO2 detected in the trunk indicates an occupant is present, the microcontroller 15 at step 46 turns on the CO2 lamp 25 of
If a back seat is unlatched, the trunk is ventilated through the airspace provided by the unlatched seat and the level of alarm is therefore reduced. As shown at step 47, if a back seat is unlatched, the movement of the vehicle is checked at 49 and the front console alarms are continued for a time-out period. If the vehicle stops during this period, the trunk is automatically opened by the trunk release solenoid 19 (
If an occupant is detected in the trunk and it is found at step 47 that the back seats are latched, the status of the ignition system 27, 29 (
If the sensed condition of the ignition at step 57 is “on”, the microcontroller 15 at step 61 determines whether the vehicle is moving by analyzing wheel speed signals from sensors 30 of
If the vehicle is moving at step 61, the microcontroller 15 times out a predetermined interval at step 65 and continuously checks at step 66 to determine if the vehicle remains moving during this interval. If the vehicle stops during this interval, the trunk is opened at step 67 to allow the occupant to escape, the alarms are turned off, and control is returned to step 33 as previously described. If the vehicle is still moving at the end of the time-out interval of step 65, a higher level of alarm is generated at step 69 by triggering a radio alert at 51, 53 (
Variations and modifications of the embodiments disclosed herein may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the CO2 detector may be replaced or augmented by infrared and electrostatic capacitive sensors. At present it is believed that use of a CO2 sensor is preferred, because infrared and electrostatic sensors might not be able to detect a person if, for example, the trunk is partially filled with cargo. The system could also be modified to open an air vent to the trunk or partially open the trunk to allow ventilation in the event of an alarm condition. Additional conditions would also be defined to wake up the microcontroller to process peripheral equipment or interrupts for vehicle systems other than the CO2 system. The aforementioned description of embodiments of the invention is therefore intended to be illustrative rather than limiting and it should therefore be understood that the following claims and their equivalents set forth the scope of the invention.
This nonprovisional application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/131,189, filed Apr. 26, 1999.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3647392 | McGinnis | Mar 1972 | A |
3673069 | Niedrach et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3992909 | McGhee | Nov 1976 | A |
4321545 | Cameron | Mar 1982 | A |
4508598 | Giner | Apr 1985 | A |
4691701 | Williams | Sep 1987 | A |
4715944 | Yanagida et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4742761 | Horstman | May 1988 | A |
4846937 | Driscoll et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4851088 | Chandrasekhar et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4879461 | Philipp | Nov 1989 | A |
4926164 | Porter et al. | May 1990 | A |
5071526 | Pletcher et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5132663 | Strobl et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5194134 | Futata et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5371659 | Pastrick et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5404128 | Ogino et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5445326 | Ferro et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5464369 | Federspiel | Nov 1995 | A |
5468451 | Gedeon | Nov 1995 | A |
5480611 | Mills et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5522980 | Hobbs et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5554912 | Thayer et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5598141 | Grasmann et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5653386 | Hennessee et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669704 | Pastrick | Sep 1997 | A |
5682145 | Sweetman et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693943 | Tchernihovski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5694653 | Harald | Dec 1997 | A |
5742516 | Olcerst | Apr 1998 | A |
5775406 | Ghitea, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793291 | Thornton | Aug 1998 | A |
5856646 | Simon | Jan 1999 | A |
5859479 | David | Jan 1999 | A |
5910239 | Maier et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912624 | Howard, II | Jun 1999 | A |
5920057 | Sonderegger et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938321 | Bos et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949340 | Rossi | Sep 1999 | A |
6018292 | Penny, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6086131 | Bingle et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6139172 | Bos et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150927 | Nesbitt | Nov 2000 | A |
6166625 | Teowee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6254261 | Bingle et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278377 | DeLine et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6349984 | Marrazzo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6390529 | Bingle et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6420975 | DeLine et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428172 | Hutzel et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460906 | Bingle et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480103 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485081 | Bingle et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6621411 | McCarthy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6692056 | Bingle et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6783167 | Bingle et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6832793 | Bingle et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6902284 | Hutzel et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
20050023858 | Bingle et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
198 36 935 C 1 | Mar 2000 | DE |
1039077 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1039077 | Sep 2000 | EP |
10-278564 | Oct 1998 | JP |
WO 9836950 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9904119 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 0058584 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60131189 | Apr 1999 | US |