System for detecting electrical properties of a molecular complex

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10156541
  • Patent Number
    10,156,541
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 21, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 18, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A system for detecting electrical properties of a molecular complex is disclosed. The system includes an electrode electrically coupled to a molecular complex that outputs an electrical signal affected by an electrical property of the molecular complex, wherein the effect of the electrical property of the molecular complex on the electrical signal is characterized by an expected bandwidth. The system further includes an integrating amplifier circuit configured to receive the electrical signal from the electrode. The integrating amplifier circuit is further configured to selectively amplify and integrate a portion of the electrical signal over time within a predetermined bandwidth, wherein the predetermined bandwidth is selected at least in part based on the expected bandwidth.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Advances in micro-miniaturization within the semiconductor industry in recent years have enabled biotechnologists to begin packing their traditionally bulky sensing tools into smaller and smaller form factors, onto so-called biochips. It would be desirable to develop techniques for biochips.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a sensor circuit 100 for measuring a physical property within a single cell in a biochip.



FIG. 2 illustrates that with a constant noise floor, as the measured signal bandwidth decreases, the signal to noise ratio increases, thereby improving the sensitivity of sensor circuit 100 of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram illustrating an embodiment of a sensor circuit 300 for measuring a physical property, e.g., a current, within a single cell in a nanopore array.



FIG. 4 is a circuit diagram illustrating a second embodiment of a sensor circuit 400 for measuring a physical property within a single cell in a nanopore array.



FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a plot of the voltage at the output of the integrating amplifier in circuit 300 or circuit 400 versus time.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a cell array in a biochip.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process; an apparatus; a system; a composition of matter; a computer program product embodied on a computer readable storage medium; and/or a processor, such as a processor configured to execute instructions stored on and/or provided by a memory coupled to the processor. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, a component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task may be implemented as a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. As used herein, the term ‘processor’ refers to one or more devices, circuits, and/or processing cores configured to process data, such as computer program instructions.


In various embodiments, the techniques described herein are implemented in a variety of systems or forms. In some embodiments, the techniques are implemented in hardware as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). In some embodiments, a processor (e.g., an embedded one such as an ARM core) is used where the processor is provided or loaded with instructions to perform the techniques described herein. In some embodiments, the technique is implemented as a computer program product which is embodied in a computer readable storage medium and comprises computer instructions.


A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.


Advances in micro-miniaturization within the semiconductor industry in recent years have enabled biotechnologists to begin packing their traditionally bulky sensing tools into smaller and smaller form factors, onto so-called biochips. These chips are essentially miniaturized laboratories that can perform hundreds or thousands of simultaneous biochemical reactions. Biochips enable researchers to quickly screen large numbers of biological analytes for a variety of purposes, from disease diagnosis to detection of bioterrorism agents.


Typically, a biochip includes a large array of cells. For example, a biochip for nucleotide sequencing may contain thousands or millions of single cells in an array. Each cell includes a molecular complex composed of monomers that make up an oligomeric nanopore and a single strand of DNA, and anything bound to that single strand of DNA. The nanopore is a small hole in an electrically insulating membrane that can be used as a single-molecule detector. A nanopore may be formed using a biological material, such as α-hemolysin or MspA. A nanopore may be formed using a solid-state material, such as a semiconductor material. When a small voltage is applied across a molecular complex containing a nanopore, an ionic current through the molecular complex can be measured to provide information about the structure of a molecule transiting the molecular complex. In a single cell of the array, an electrical circuit may be used for controlling the electrical stimulus applied across a lipid bilayer which contains a nanopore, and for detecting the electrical patterns, or signatures, of a molecule passing through the nanopore. These patterns or signatures identify events of interest such as additions or subtractions to the molecular complex, or conformational changes to the molecular complex. In order to reduce the cost of the array, physically small single cells with highly sensitive sensors therein are desirable.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a sensor circuit 100 for measuring a physical property within a single cell in a biochip. As shown in FIG. 1, a physical property, e.g., a current, voltage, or charge, is detected by detector 102 as detected signal 104. Sensor circuit 100 may be used to measure the mean value of detected signal 104 without sampling as described further below.


In some embodiments, an initiation flag 106 resets an integrating amplifier 108 and starts a continuous integration of detected signal 104 over time. Integrated output 110 is compared with a trip threshold 114 using a comparator 112. When integrated output 110 reaches trip threshold 114, a trip flag 116 may be used as a feedback signal to integrating amplifier 108 for terminating the integration of detected signal 104. For example, when trip flag 116 is “on” or asserted, the integration is terminated. The duration of time between the assertion of initiation flag 106 and the assertion of trip flag 116 is proportional to the mean value of detected signal 104, e.g., the mean value of a current. Accordingly, the “on” and “off” of trip flag 116 (only 1 bit of information) may be sent from the cell to an external processor for calculating the mean value of detected signal 104. Alternatively, the “on/off” information may be sent from the cell to an external storage for delayed processing. For example, the clock cycles at which initiation flag 106 and trip flag 116 are respectively asserted may be recorded in an external storage. The number of clock cycles between the two asserted flags may then be used to determine the mean value of detected signal 104 at a later time.


In some embodiments, more accurate results may be obtained by integrating detected signal 104 over multiple integrating cycles. For example, the determined mean value of detected signal 104 may be further averaged over multiple integrating cycles. In some embodiments, initiation flag 106 is based at least in part on trip flag 116. For example, initiation flag 106 may be re-asserted in response to trip flag 116 being asserted. In this example, trip flag 116 is used as a feedback signal for reinitializing integrating amplifier 108, such that another cycle of integration of detected signal 104 may begin as soon as the previous cycle of integration is terminated. Re-asserting initiation flag 106 immediately after trip flag 116 is asserted reduces the portion of time when detector 102 generates a signal that is not integrated and thus not measured. The integration occurs over approximately the entire time that the signal is available. As a result, most of the information of the signal is captured, thereby minimizing the time to obtain an average value for the measured signal.


Shot noise may corrupt trip flag 116 during certain integrating cycles. Accordingly, some embodiments may include logic to determine whether trip flag 116 has been corrupted by shot noise in a particular integrating cycle before trip flag 116 is saved or used for any calculation.


The sensitivity of sensor circuit 100 is maximized by continuously integrating detected signal 102 without sampling. This serves to limit the bandwidth of the measured signal. With continuous reference to FIG. 1, trip threshold 114 and an integration coefficient A set the bandwidth of the measured signal. As integration coefficient A decreases or as trip threshold 114 increases, the measured signal bandwidth decreases. FIG. 2 illustrates that with a constant noise floor, as the measured signal bandwidth decreases, the signal to noise ratio increases, improving the sensitivity of sensor circuit 100. In some embodiments, the measured signal bandwidth can be dynamically adjusted by varying the trip threshold 114.



FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram illustrating an embodiment of a sensor circuit 300 for measuring a physical property, e.g., a voltage, within a single cell in a nanopore array. FIG. 4 is a circuit diagram illustrating a second embodiment of a sensor circuit 400 for measuring a physical property within a single cell in a nanopore array.


With reference to FIGS. 3 and 4, the Si control circuitry includes a comparator and other logic, e.g., logic for switching. The other components of circuit 300 (or circuit 400), including the differential pair, implement an integrating amplifier similar to that in FIG. 1. The input of circuit 300 (or circuit 400) is connected to a nanopore system local electrode.



FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a plot of the voltage at 310 (or 410) in circuit 300 (or circuit 400) versus time. In FIG. 5, ttrip indicates the mean current flowing through a nanopore. Reducing the noise bandwidth reduces the noise associated with ttrip. Accordingly, the mean current measurement will have a higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) and be more precise.


The integrating amplifier generates signals within an expected bandwidth containing events of interest of the molecular complex. The integrating amplifier is configured to amplify only signals in the bandwidth of interest, and reject signals outside this bandwidth. Amplifying all signals amplifies mostly noise since the useful signal's bandwidth is much smaller than the detected signal, resulting in poor SNR. The bandwidth of interest may be limited by selecting appropriate values for C1 and IO in circuits 300 and 400. In some embodiments, C1 and IO are selected to limit the bandwidth of interest between 0.3 Hz and 300 Hz. In some embodiments, the bandwidth of interest can be dynamically adjusted by varying the values of C1.


In some embodiments, trip flag 116 for each of the cells are further synchronized with a global clock shared by all the cells within the biochip. For example, trip flag 116 that is synchronized with a global clock may be generated by a pulse generation circuit. After synchronization, trip flag 116 is a single pulse that is in phase with the global clock.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a cell array in a biochip. Each of the cells may contain a sensor circuit 100 for measuring a physical property within the cell as described above. As shown in FIG. 6, the cell array has m columns by n rows of single cells. All the cells in a given column share the same column line 302, and all the cells in a given row share the same row line 304. When trip flag 116 for a particular cell is asserted, the cell asserts its particular column line 302 and row line 304. In order to reduce the pin count of the biochip, a column multiplexer 306 may be used to output a column number (0-2m-1) to indicate which column line 302 has been asserted. Similarly, a row multiplexer 308 may be used to output a row number (0-2n-1) to indicate which row line 304 has been asserted. For example, if trip flag 116 of the cell in the second column and the second row is asserted, the output column and row number is (1, 1). As long as only one cell asserts its trip flag 116 at a time, the reported column and row numbers are sufficient to uniquely identify which particular cell is asserted at a particular time.


The above techniques have a number of advantages over other approaches. The integrating amplifier requires minimal die area and allows for each array site to have its own dedicated measurement circuit. This feature removes the necessity of routing sensitive analog signals to the array periphery and avoids the need for multiplexing, thereby reducing noise. The integrating amplifier requires no pre-amplifier, sample and hold, or anti-aliasing filter, further reducing die area and potential error sources. Since only a single flag is required to denote the completion of a measurement, the integrating approach is an efficient way to communicate data from each array site. Measurements are being made continuously (other than the brief time required to reset the integration capacitor) so data is being gathered almost 100% of the time. Furthermore, each cell and its associated measurement circuit operate autonomously, allowing each cell to track the state of the molecule being measured. As described above, the integrating approach also has inherent signal averaging and noise advantages.


Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims
  • 1. A system for detecting electrical properties of a molecular complex, comprising: an electrode electrically coupled to a molecular complex that outputs an electrical signal affected by an electrical property of the molecular complex, wherein the effect of the electrical property of the molecular complex on the electrical signal is characterized by an expected bandwidth; andan integrating amplifier circuit configured to: receive the electrical signal from the electrode;selectively integrate the electrical signal within a predetermined bandwidth, wherein the predetermined bandwidth is selected at least in part based on the expected bandwidth;compare the selectively integrated electrical signal to a threshold;output an indication that the selectively integrated electrical signal has reached the threshold;initiate the integrating based on an initiation flag; andterminate the integrating based on the indication.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the expected bandwidth comprises a bandwidth of events of interest of the molecular complex.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the electrical property comprises one of the following: a current, voltage, charge, or capacitance.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the integrating amplifier circuit is further configured to adjust the predetermined bandwidth based at least in part on adjusting the threshold.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the indication corresponds to a mean value of the electrical property.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the indication comprises a 1-bit flag.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein a time period between the initiating and the terminating of the integrating corresponds to a mean value of the electrical property.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the integrating is repeated by deriving the initiation flag based at least in part on the indication.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the initiation flag is re-asserted in response to the indication.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the predetermined bandwidth is adjusted based at least in part on adjusting a capacitance value associated with a circuit performing the integrating.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the predetermined bandwidth is adjusted based at least in part on adjusting a bias applied across a nanopore associated with the molecular complex.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the integrating amplifier circuit is further configured to filter noise associated with the electrical signal.
CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/558,268, entitled SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF A MOLECULAR COMPLEX, filed Dec. 2, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/272,128, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,962,242, entitled SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF A MOLECULAR COMPLEX, filed Oct. 12, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/435,700, entitled SYSTEM FOR COMMUNICATING INFORMATION FROM AN ARRAY OF SENSORS, filed Jan. 24, 2011, all of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (242)
Number Name Date Kind
2656508 Coulter Oct 1953 A
3638120 Jost Jan 1972 A
4121192 Wilson Oct 1978 A
4713347 Mitchell Dec 1987 A
4859945 Stokar Aug 1989 A
5021692 Hughes Jun 1991 A
5198543 Blanco Mar 1993 A
5235267 Schoneberg Aug 1993 A
5260663 Blades Nov 1993 A
5302509 Cheeseman Apr 1994 A
5308539 Koden May 1994 A
5457342 Herbst, II Oct 1995 A
5541851 Sato Jul 1996 A
5569950 Lewis Oct 1996 A
5576204 Blanco Nov 1996 A
5747805 Youngquist May 1998 A
5756355 Lang May 1998 A
5770367 Southern Jun 1998 A
5795782 Church Aug 1998 A
5804386 Ju Sep 1998 A
5814454 Ju Sep 1998 A
5869244 Martin Feb 1999 A
5876936 Ju Mar 1999 A
5912155 Chatterjee Jun 1999 A
5939301 Hughes, Jr. Aug 1999 A
5952180 Ju Sep 1999 A
5981733 Gamble Nov 1999 A
6012291 Ema Jan 2000 A
6014213 Waterhouse Jan 2000 A
6015714 Baldarelli Jan 2000 A
6046005 Ju Apr 2000 A
6082115 Strnad Jul 2000 A
6210896 Chan Apr 2001 B1
6217731 Kane Apr 2001 B1
6232103 Short May 2001 B1
6255083 Williams Jul 2001 B1
6261797 Sorge Jul 2001 B1
6265193 Brandis Jul 2001 B1
6321101 Holmström Nov 2001 B1
6362002 Denison Mar 2002 B1
6383749 Bochkariov May 2002 B2
6399320 Markau Jun 2002 B1
6399335 Kao Jun 2002 B1
6413792 Sauer Jul 2002 B1
6485703 Cote Nov 2002 B1
6607883 Frey Aug 2003 B1
6616895 Dugas Sep 2003 B2
6627748 Ju Sep 2003 B1
6664079 Ju Dec 2003 B2
6673615 Denison Jan 2004 B2
6686997 Allen Feb 2004 B1
6699719 Yamazaki Mar 2004 B2
6723513 Lexow Apr 2004 B2
6746594 Akeson Jun 2004 B2
6762048 Williams Jul 2004 B2
6794177 Markau Sep 2004 B2
6800933 Mathews Oct 2004 B1
6824659 Bayley Nov 2004 B2
6880346 Tseng Apr 2005 B1
6891278 Muller May 2005 B2
6916665 Bayley Jul 2005 B2
6952651 Su Oct 2005 B2
7033762 Nelson Apr 2006 B2
7041812 Kumar May 2006 B2
7052839 Nelson May 2006 B2
7057026 Barnes Jun 2006 B2
7074597 Ju Jul 2006 B2
7153672 Eickbush Dec 2006 B1
7189503 Akeson Mar 2007 B2
7223541 Fuller May 2007 B2
7229799 Williams Jun 2007 B2
7238485 Akeson Jul 2007 B2
7244602 Frey Jul 2007 B2
7279337 Zhu Oct 2007 B2
7321329 Tooyama Jan 2008 B2
7368668 Ren May 2008 B2
7405281 Xu Jul 2008 B2
7410564 Flory Aug 2008 B2
7446017 Liu Nov 2008 B2
7452698 Sood Nov 2008 B2
7468271 Golovchenko Dec 2008 B2
7572624 Gumbrecht Aug 2009 B2
7622934 Hibbs Nov 2009 B2
7625701 Williams Dec 2009 B2
7626379 Peters Dec 2009 B2
7710479 Nitta May 2010 B2
7727722 Nelson Jun 2010 B2
7745116 Williams Jun 2010 B2
7777013 Xu Aug 2010 B2
7777505 White Aug 2010 B2
7871777 Schneider Jan 2011 B2
7897738 Brandis Mar 2011 B2
7906371 Kim Mar 2011 B2
7924335 Itakura Apr 2011 B2
7939259 Kokoris May 2011 B2
7939270 Holden May 2011 B2
7947454 Akeson May 2011 B2
7948015 Rothberg May 2011 B2
7973146 Shen Jul 2011 B2
7989928 Liao Aug 2011 B2
8022511 Chiu Sep 2011 B2
8058030 Smith Nov 2011 B2
8058031 Xu Nov 2011 B2
8133672 Bjornson Mar 2012 B2
8137569 Harnack Mar 2012 B2
8148516 Williams Apr 2012 B2
8192961 Williams Jun 2012 B2
8252911 Bjornson Aug 2012 B2
8257954 Clark Sep 2012 B2
8324914 Chen Dec 2012 B2
8461854 Chen Jun 2013 B2
8828208 Canas Sep 2014 B2
8962242 Chen Feb 2015 B2
9581563 Chen Feb 2017 B2
9605307 Chen Mar 2017 B2
9869655 Chen Jan 2018 B2
20020039743 Hashimoto Apr 2002 A1
20030027140 Ju Feb 2003 A1
20030054360 Gold Mar 2003 A1
20030080042 Barth May 2003 A1
20030101006 Mansky May 2003 A1
20030102263 Lopez Jun 2003 A1
20030166282 Brown Sep 2003 A1
20030198982 Seela Oct 2003 A1
20040053337 Yamazaki Mar 2004 A1
20040122335 Sackellares Jun 2004 A1
20040144658 Flory Jul 2004 A1
20040185466 Ju Sep 2004 A1
20040262636 Yang Dec 2004 A1
20050032081 Ju Feb 2005 A1
20050091989 Leija May 2005 A1
20050127035 Ling Jun 2005 A1
20050136408 Tom-Moy Jun 2005 A1
20050164286 O'uchi Jul 2005 A1
20050186576 Chan Aug 2005 A1
20050208574 Bayley Sep 2005 A1
20050221351 Ryu Oct 2005 A1
20050239134 Gorenstein Oct 2005 A1
20060057565 Ju Mar 2006 A1
20060057585 McAllister Mar 2006 A1
20060105373 Pourmand May 2006 A1
20060105461 Tom-Moy May 2006 A1
20060246497 Huang Nov 2006 A1
20060252038 Ju Nov 2006 A1
20060278992 Trezza Dec 2006 A1
20070173731 Meka Jul 2007 A1
20070190542 Ling Aug 2007 A1
20070191015 Hwang Aug 2007 A1
20070196846 Hanzel Aug 2007 A1
20070275387 Ju Nov 2007 A1
20080094076 Hibbs Apr 2008 A1
20080101988 Kang May 2008 A1
20080108082 Rank May 2008 A1
20080171316 Golovchenko Jul 2008 A1
20080199932 Hanzel Aug 2008 A1
20080217546 Steadman Sep 2008 A1
20080218184 White Sep 2008 A1
20080254995 Kim Oct 2008 A1
20080286768 Lexow Nov 2008 A1
20080318245 Smirnov Dec 2008 A1
20090029477 Meller Jan 2009 A1
20090066315 Hu Mar 2009 A1
20090073293 Yaffe Mar 2009 A1
20090087834 Lexow Apr 2009 A1
20090099786 Oliver Apr 2009 A1
20090102534 Schmid Apr 2009 A1
20090136958 Gershow May 2009 A1
20090167288 Reid Jul 2009 A1
20090215050 Jenison Aug 2009 A1
20090233280 Nomoto Sep 2009 A1
20090269759 Menchen, Jr. Oct 2009 A1
20090298072 Ju Dec 2009 A1
20100025238 Gottlieb Feb 2010 A1
20100025249 Polonsky Feb 2010 A1
20100035260 Olasagasti Feb 2010 A1
20100047802 Bjorson Feb 2010 A1
20100072080 Karhanek Mar 2010 A1
20100075328 Bjornson Mar 2010 A1
20100075332 Patel Mar 2010 A1
20100078325 Oliver Apr 2010 A1
20100078777 Barth Apr 2010 A1
20100084276 Lindsay Apr 2010 A1
20100092952 Ju Apr 2010 A1
20100093555 Bjornson Apr 2010 A1
20100121582 Pan May 2010 A1
20100122907 Stanford May 2010 A1
20100148126 Guan Jun 2010 A1
20100196203 Sanghera Aug 2010 A1
20100243449 Oliver Sep 2010 A1
20100261247 Hanzel Oct 2010 A1
20100261287 Holt Oct 2010 A1
20100292101 So Nov 2010 A1
20100297644 Kokoris Nov 2010 A1
20100301398 Rothberg Dec 2010 A1
20100320094 White Dec 2010 A1
20100331194 Turner Dec 2010 A1
20110005918 Akeson Jan 2011 A1
20110008775 Gao Jan 2011 A1
20110050200 Tartagni Mar 2011 A1
20110053284 Meller Mar 2011 A1
20110059505 Hanzel Mar 2011 A1
20110165652 Hardin Jul 2011 A1
20110168551 White Jul 2011 A1
20110168968 Yang Jul 2011 A1
20110174625 Akeson Jul 2011 A1
20110189659 Clark Aug 2011 A1
20110192723 Chen Aug 2011 A1
20110193249 Chen Aug 2011 A1
20110193570 Chen Aug 2011 A1
20110218414 Kamath Sep 2011 A1
20110226623 Timp Sep 2011 A1
20110244447 Korlach Oct 2011 A1
20110287414 Chen Nov 2011 A1
20120034602 Emig Feb 2012 A1
20120040343 Timp Feb 2012 A1
20120040869 Meller Feb 2012 A1
20120052188 Chen Mar 2012 A1
20120094278 Akeson Apr 2012 A1
20120094332 Lee Apr 2012 A1
20120115736 Bjornson May 2012 A1
20120133354 Canas May 2012 A1
20120149021 Yung Jun 2012 A1
20120160681 Davis Jun 2012 A1
20120160687 Akeson Jun 2012 A1
20120160688 Davis Jun 2012 A1
20120187963 Chen Jul 2012 A1
20120188092 Chen Jul 2012 A1
20120196759 Chen Aug 2012 A1
20120261261 Huber Oct 2012 A1
20120322679 Brown Dec 2012 A1
20130015068 Chen Jan 2013 A1
20130071837 Winters-Hilt Mar 2013 A1
20130118902 Akeson May 2013 A1
20130207205 Chen Aug 2013 A1
20130244340 Davis Sep 2013 A1
20130263946 Afzali-Ardakani Oct 2013 A1
20130327644 Turner Dec 2013 A1
20140034497 Davis Feb 2014 A1
20140296083 Brown Oct 2014 A1
20140329693 Reid Nov 2014 A1
20140346059 Akeson Nov 2014 A1
20150060276 Golovchenko Mar 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (54)
Number Date Country
101421616 Apr 2009 CN
103193189 Jul 2013 CN
1236807 Sep 2002 EP
1712891 Oct 2006 EP
2004205495 Jul 2004 JP
2004333485 Nov 2004 JP
2005538377 Dec 2005 JP
2008507703 Mar 2008 JP
2010502936 Jan 2010 JP
2010524436 Jul 2010 JP
2011506994 Mar 2011 JP
2012026986 Feb 2012 JP
2013512447 Apr 2013 JP
WO-9106678 May 1991 WO
WO-9321340 Oct 1993 WO
WO-9732999 Sep 1997 WO
WO-9746704 Dec 1997 WO
WO-2002022883 Mar 2002 WO
WO-2002029003 Apr 2002 WO
WO-02079519 Oct 2002 WO
WO-03095617 Nov 2003 WO
WO-2004007773 Jan 2004 WO
WO-2004055160 Jul 2004 WO
WO-2005084367 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2006020775 Feb 2006 WO
WO-2007002204 Jan 2007 WO
WO-2007053702 May 2007 WO
WO-2007053719 May 2007 WO
WO-2007062105 May 2007 WO
WO-2007115694 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2007127327 Nov 2007 WO
WO-2007146158 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2008034602 Mar 2008 WO
WO-2008069973 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2008071982 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2008079169 Jul 2008 WO
WO-2008102120 Aug 2008 WO
WO-2008124107 Oct 2008 WO
WO-2009005547 Jan 2009 WO
WO-2009047703 Apr 2009 WO
WO-2009051807 Apr 2009 WO
WO-2009077734 Jun 2009 WO
WO-2009138760 Nov 2009 WO
WO-2010044932 Apr 2010 WO
WO-2010122293 Oct 2010 WO
WO-2011097028 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011103424 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011106459 Sep 2011 WO
WO-2012009578 Jan 2012 WO
WO-2012088339 Jun 2012 WO
WO-2012088341 Jun 2012 WO
WO-2012121756 Sep 2012 WO
WO-2013011879 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013082619 Jun 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (170)
Entry
Akeson, et al. Microsecond time-scale discrimination among polycytidylic acid, polyadenylic acid, and plolyuridylic acid as homopolymers or a s segments within single RNA molecules. Biophys J. Dec. 1999; 77(6):3227-33.
Aksimentiev, et al. Microscopic Kinetics of DNA Translocation through synthetic nanopores. Biophys J. Sep. 2004;87(3):2086-97.
Anderson, Olaf Sparre. “Sequencing and the single channel.” Biophysical journal 77.6 (1999): 2899.
Ashkenasy, et al. Recognizing a single base in an individual DNA strand: a step toward DNA sequencing in nanopores. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Feb. 18, 2005:44(9):1401-4.
Atanasov, et al. Membrane on a chip: a functional tethered lipid bilayer membrane on silicon oxide surfaces. Biophys J. Sep. 2005;89(3):1780-8.
Baaken, et al. Planar microelectrode-cavity array for high-resolution and parallel electrical recording of membrane ionic currents. Lab Chip. Jun. 2008;8(6):938-44. Epub Apr. 16, 2008.
Bai, et al. Design and synthesis of a photocleavable biotinylated nucleotide for DNA analysis by mass spectrometry. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 26, 2004;32(2):535-41. Print 2004.
Benner et al., “Sequence-specific detection of individual DNA polymerase complexes in real time using a nanopore,” Nature Nanotechnology (Nov. 2007), pp. 718-724, vol. 2.
Bezrukov, et al. Counting polymers moving through a single ion channel. Nature. Jul. 28, 1994;370(6487):279-81.
Bezrukov, et al. Dynamic partitioning of neutral polymers into a single ion channel. In NATO Advanced Research Workshop: Structure and dynamics of confined polymers. Kulwer Press. 2002; 117-130.
Bezrukov, et al. Dynamics and free energy of polymers partitioning into a nanoscale pore. Macromolecules. 1996; 29:8517-8522.
Bezrukov, et al. Neutral polymers in the nanopores of alamethicin and alpha-hemolysin. Biologicheskie Membrany 2001, 18, 451-455.
Boireau, et al. Unique supramolecular assembly of a redox protein with nucleic acids onto hybrid bilayer: towards a dynamic DNA chip. Biosens Bioelectron. Feb. 15, 2005;20(8):1631-7.
Bokhari, et al. A parallel graph decomposition algorithm for DNA sequencing with nanopores. Bioinformatics. Apr. 1, 2005;21(7):889-96. Epub Nov. 11, 2004.
Buchmann, et al. Electrochemical release from gold-thiolate electrodes for controlled insertion of ion channels into bilayer membranes. Bioorg Med Chem. Mar. 15, 2004;12(6):1315-24.
Butler et al. Determination of RNA orientation during translocation through a biological nanopore. Biophys J. Jan. 1, 2006;90(1):190-9. Epub Oct. 7, 2005.
Butler et al. Single-molecule DNA detection with an engineered MspA protein nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 30, 2008;105(52):20647-52. Epub Dec. 19, 2008.
Butler, et al. Ionic current blockades from DNA and RNA molecules in the alphahemolysis nanopore. Biophys J. Nov. 1, 2007;93(9):3229-40. Epub Aug. 3, 2007.
Chandler, et al. Membrane surface dynamics of DNA-threaded nanopores revealed by simultaneous single-molecule optical and ensemble electrical recording. Langmuir. Feb. 3, 2004;20(3):898-905.
Churbanov, et al. Duration learning for analysis of nanopore ionic current blockades. BMC Bioinformatics. Nov. 1, 2007;8 Suppl 7:S14.
Clarke, et al. Continuous base identification for single-molucule nanpore DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol. Apr. 2009;4(4):265-70. Epub Feb. 22, 2009.
Cockroft, et al. A single-molecule nanpore device detects DNA polymerase activity with single-nucleotide resolution. J am Chem Soc. Jan. 23, 2008;130(3):818-20. Epub Jan. 1, 2008.
Danelon, et al. Cell membranes suspended across nanoaperture arrays. Langmuir. Jan. 3, 2006;22(1):22-5.
Deamer, et al. Characterization of nucleic acids by nanopore analysis. Acc Chem Res. Oct. 2002;35(10):817-25.
Derrington, et al. Nanopore DNA sequencing with MspA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 14, 2010;107(37):16060-5. Epub Aug. 26, 2010.
Einstein. Investigations on the theory of Brownian movement. Dover, New York. 1956.
Ervin, et al. Simultaneous alternating and direct current readout of protein ion channel blocking events using glass nanopore membranes. Anal Chem. Mar. 15, 2008;80(6):2069-76. Epub Feb. 23, 2008.
Flusberg, et al. Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Nat Methods. Jun. 2010;7(6):461-5. Epub May 9, 2010.
Fologea, et al. Detecting single stranded DNA with a solid state nanopore. Nano Lett. Oct. 2005;5(10):1905-9.
Fologea, et al. Slowing DNA translocation in a solid-state nanopore. Nano Lett. Sep. 2005;5(9):1734-7.
Gu, et al. Stochastic sensing of organic analytes by a pore-forming protein containing a molecular adapter. Nature. Apr. 22, 1999;398(6729):686-90.
Haas, et al. Improvement of the quality of self assembled bilayer lipid membrances by using a negative potential. Bioelectrochemistry. Aug. 2001;54(1):1-10.
Halverson, et al. Anthrax biosensor, protective antigen ion channel asymmetric blockade. J Biol Chem. Oct. 7, 2005;280(40):34056-62. Epub Aug. 8, 2005.
Harlepp, et al. Probing complex RNA structures by mechanical force. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. Dec. 2003;12(4):605-15.
Heins, et al. Detecting single porphyrin molecules in a conically shaped synthetic nanopore. Nano Lett. Sep. 2005;5(9):1824-9.
Heng, et al. Stretching DNA using the electric field in a synthetic nanopore. Nano Lett. Oct. 2005;5(10):1883-8.
Heng, et al. The electromechanics of DNA in a synthetic nanopore. Biophys J. Feb. 1, 2006;90(3)1098-106. Epub Nov. 11, 2005.
Henrickson, et al. Driven DNA transport into an asymmetric nanometer-scale pore. Phys Rev Lett. Oct. 2, 2000;85(14):3057-60.
Henrickson, et al. Probing single nanometer-scale pores with polymeric molecular rulers. J Chem Phys. Apr. 7, 2010;132(13):135101. doi: 10.1063/1.3328875.
Holden, et al. Direct introduction of single protein channels and pores into lipid bilayers. J Am Chem Soc. May 11, 2005;127(18):6502-3.
Holden, et al. Direct transfer of membrane proteins from bacteria to planar bilayers for rapid screening by single-channel recording. Nat Chem Biol. Jun. 2006;2(6):314-8. Epub May 7, 2006.
Hromada, et al. Single molecule measurements within individual membrane-bound ion channels using a polymer-based bilayer lipid membrane chip. Lab Chip. Apr. 2008;8(4):602-8. Epub Feb. 29, 2008.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 24, 2008 in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2007/013559.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2012 for PCT/US2011/066627.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2012 for PCT/US2011/066632.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 2, 2013 for PCT/US2013/022273.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2013 for PCT/US2012/063099.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 16, 2013 for PCT/US2013/026514.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 3, 2012 for PCT/US2012/020827.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 9, 2013 for PCT/US2013/028058.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2012 for PCT/US2011/064490.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 29, 2007 for PCT/US2007/013559.
International Search Report dated Feb. 24, 2013 for PCT/US2011/065640.
Ito, et al. Simultaneous determination of the size and surface charge of individual nanoparticles using a carbon nanotube-based Coulter counter. Anal Chem. May 15, 2003;75(10):2399-406.
Jetha et al. Forming an α-Hemolysin Nanopore for Single-Molecule Analysis. Micro and Nano Technologies in Bioanalysis. Humana Press, 2009. 113-127.
Jiang et al. Passive and Electrically Actuated Solid-State Nanopores for Sensing and Manipulating DNA.€Nanopore-Based Technology. Humana Press, 2012. 241-264.
Ju, et al. Cassette labeling for facile construction of energy transfer fluorescent primers. Nucleic Acids Res. Mar. 15, 1996;24(6):1144-8.
Ju, et al. Energy transfer primers: a new fluorescence labeling paradigm for DNA sequencing and analysis. Nat Med. Feb. 1996;2(2):246-9.
Ju, et al. Fluorescence energy transfer dye-labeled primers for DNA sequencing and analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 9, 1995;92(10):4347-51.
Ju, et al. Four-color DNA sequencing by synthesis using cleavable fluorescent nucleotide reversible terminators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 26, 2006;103(52):19635-40. Epub Dec. 14, 2006.
Jurak, et al. Wettability and topography of phospholipid DPPC multilayers deposited by spin-coating on glass, silicon and mica slides. Langmuir. Sep. 25, 2007;23(20):10156-63. Epub Aug. 28, 2007.
Kang, et al. A storable encapsulated bilayer chip containing a single protein nanopore. J Am Chem Soc. Apr. 18, 2007;129(15):4701-5. Epub Mar. 22, 2007.
Kasianowicz, et al. Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 26, 1996;93(24)13770-3.
Kasianowicz, et al. Physics of DNA threading through a nanometer pore and applications to simultaneous multianalyte sesnsing. In NATO Advanced Research Workshop: Structure and dynamics of confined polymers. Kluwer Press. 2002; 141-163.
Kasianowicz, et al. Simultaneous multianalysis detection with a nanopore. Anal. Chem. 2001; 73:2268-2272.
Kasianowicz. Nanometer-scale pores: potential applications for analyte detection and DNA characterization. Dis Markers. 2002;18(4):185-91.
Kasianowicz. Nanopores: flossing with DNA. Nat Mater. Jun. 2004;3(6):355-6.
Kawano, et al. Controlling the translocation of single-stranded DNA through alphahemolysin ion channels using viscosity. Langmuir. Jan. 20, 2009;25(2)1233-7.
Kim et al. Rapid fabrication of uniformly sized nanopores and nanopore arrays for parallel DNA analysis.€Advanced Materials€18.23 (2006): 3149-3153.
Krasilnikov, et al. A simple method for the determination of the pore radius of ion channels in planar lipid bilayer membranes. FEMS Microbiol Immunol. Sep. 1992;5(1-3):93-100.
Krasilnikov, et al. Single polymer molecules in a protein nanopore in the limit of a strong polymer-pore attraction. Phys Rev Lett. Jul. 7, 2006;97(1):018301. Epub Jul. 5, 2006.
Krasilnikov, et al. Sizing channels with neutral polymers. In NATO Advanced Research Workshop: Structure and dynamics of confined polymers. Kluwer Press. 2002; 97-116.
Kullman, et al. Transport of maltodextrins through maltoporin: a single-channel study. Biophys J. Feb. 2002;82(2):803-12.
Kutik, et al. Dissecting membrane insertion of mitochondrial beta-barrel proteins. Cell. Mar. 21, 2008;132(6):1011-24.
Lee, et al. Enhancing the catalytic repertoire of nucleic acids: a systematic study of linker length and rigidity. Nucleic Acids Res. Apr. 1, 2001;29(7)1 565-73.
Li, et al. A photocleavable fluorescent nucleotide for DNA sequencing and analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 21, 2003;100(2):414-9. Epub Jan. 6, 2003.
Li, et al. Ion-beam sculpting at nanometre length scales. Nature. Jul. 12, 2001;412(6843)166-9.
Linear Technology, High Efficiency Thermoelectric Cooler Controller, 2001.
Low Noise, Dual Switched Integrator, Burr-Brown Corporation, Sep. 1994.
Lundquist, et al. A new tri-orthogonal strategy for peptide cyclization. Org Lett. Sep. 19, 2002;4(19):3219-21.
Madampage, et al. Nanopore detection of antibody prion interactions. Anal Biochem. Jan. 1, 2010;396(1):36-41. Epub Aug. 21, 2009.
Mager et al., “Lipid bilayer deposition and patterning via air bubble collapse.” Langmuir 23.18 (2007): 9369-9377.
Mathe, et al. Nanopore unzipping of individual DNA hairpin molecules. Biophys J. Nov. 2004;87(5):3205-12. Epub Sep. 3, 2004.
Mathe, et al. Orientation discrimination of single-stranded DNA inside the alpha-hemolysin membrance channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 30, 2005;102(35):12377-82. Epub Aug. 19, 2005.
Maurer, et al. Reconstitution of ion channels in agarose-supported silicon orifices. Biosens Bioelectron. May 15, 2007;22(11):2577-84. Epub Nov. 13, 2006.
McNally, et al. Optical recognition of converted DNA nucleotides for single-molecule DNA sequencing using nanopore arrays. Nano Lett. Jun. 9, 2010;10(6):2237-44.
Meller, et al. Rapid nanopore discrimination between single polynucleotide molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 1, 2000;97(3)1079-84.
Meller, et al. Single molecule measurements of DNA transport through a nanopore. Electrophoresis. Aug. 2002;23(16):2583-91.
Mohammad, et al. Controlling a single protein in a nanopore through electrostatic traps. J Am Chem Soc. Mar. 26, 2008;130(12)4081-8. Epub Mar. 6, 2008.
Mollazadeh et al. “Micropower CMOS integrated low-noise amplification, filtering, and digitization of multimodal neuropotentials.” Biomedical Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on 3.1 (2009): 1-10.
Molloy et al. “Automation of biochip array technology for quality results.” Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine 43.12 (2005): 1303-1313.
Mosquera et al. Thermal decomposition and fractal properties of sputter-deposited platinum oxide thin films.€Journal of Materials Research27.05 (2012): 829-836.
Movileanu, et al. Partitioning of a polymer into a nanoscopic protein pore obeys a simple scaling law. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 28, 2001;98(18)10137-41. Epub Aug. 14, 2001.
Movileanu, et al. Partitioning of individual flexible polymers into a nanoscopic protein pore. Biophys J. Aug. 2003;85(2):897-910.
Nakane et al. “Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis.” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15.32 (2003): R1365.
Nakane, et al. A Nanosensor for Transmembrane Capture and Identification of Single Nucleic Acid Molecules, Biophysical Journal, vol. 87, Issue 1, Jul. 2004, pp. 615-621, ISSN 0006-3495.
Office action dated Feb. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/396,522.
Office action dated Apr. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,603.
Office action dated Apr. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,591.
Office action dated Apr. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,601.
Office action dated Jun. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,604.
Office action dated Jun. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/308,091.
Office action dated Aug. 3, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,602.
Office action dated Oct. 02, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,603.
Office action dated Oct. 16, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,601.
Office action dated Oct. 25, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,591.
Office action dated Nov. 29, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/308,091.
Office action dated Dec. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,973.
Osaki et al. Analytical Chemistry, Multichannel Simultaneous Measurements of Single-Molecule Translocation in a-Hemolysin Nanopore Array, 2009, 81, pp. 9866-9870.
Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Sensor Array Chip, Jul. 14, 2011.
Park, et al. DNA hybridization sensors based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a detection tool. Sensors (Basel). 2009;9(12):9513-32. Epub Nov. 26, 2009.
Perkins, et al. Relaxation of a single DNA molecule observed by optical microscopy. Science. May 6, 1994;264(5160):822-6.
Pourmand, et al. Multiplex Pyrosequencing. Acids Res. Apr. 1, 2002;30(7):e31.
Purnell, et al. Discrimination of single base substitutions in a DNA strand immobilized in a biological nanopore. ACS Nano. Sep. 22, 2009;3(9):2533-8.
Reiner, et al. Temperature sculpting in yoctoliter volumes. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 27, 2013;135(8):3087-94. doi: 10.1021/ja309892e. Epub Feb. 14, 2013.
Reiner, et al. Theory for polymer analysis using nanopore-based single-molecule mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Jul. 6, 2010;107(27):12080-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002194107. Epub Jun. 21, 2010.
Rief, et al. Sequence-dependent mechanics of single DNA molecules. Nat Struct Biol. Apr. 1996;6(4):346-9.
Robertson, et al. Single-molecule mass spectrometry in solution using a solitary nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 15, 2007;104(20):8207-11. Epub May 9, 2007.
Rosenblum, et al. New dye-labeled terminators for improved DNA sequencing patterns. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 15, 1997;25(22):4500-4.
Rosentein et al. “Nanopore DNA sensors in CMOS with on-chip low-noise preamplifiers.” Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference (TRANSDUCERS), 2011 16th International. IEEE, 2011.
Rostovtsev, et al. A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jul. 15, 2002;41(14):2596-9.
Rotem et al., Temperature Measurement in the Intel Core Duo Processor, 2007.
Saleh, et al. Direct detection of antibody-antigen binding using an on-chip artificial pore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb. 4, 2003;100(3):820-4. Epub Jan. 27, 2003.
Sanchez-Magraner, et al. Membrane insertion of Escherichia coli alphahemolysin is independent from membrane lysis. J Biol Chem. Mar. 3, 2006;281(9):5461-7. Epub Dec. 22, 2005.
Sauer-Budge, et al. Unzipping kinetics of double-stranded DNA in a nanopore. Phys Rev Lett. Jun. 13, 2003;90(23):238101. Epub Jun. 9, 2003.
Schneider et al. “DNA sequencing with nanopores.”Nature biotechnology€30.4 (2012): 326-328.
Schuster et al., Self-Assembled a-Hemolysin Pores in an S-Layer-Supported Lipid Bilayer, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1370, (1998) 280-288.
Seo, et al. Photocleavable fluorescent nucleotides for DNA sequencing on a chip constructed by site-specific coupling chemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 13, 2004;101(15):5488-93. Epub Apr. 2, 2004.
Shim, et al. Encapsulating a single G-quadruplex aptamer in a protein nanocavity. J Phys Chem B. Jul. 17, 2008;112(28):8354-60. Epub Jun. 19, 2008.
Simon, et al. Formation and stability of a suspended biomimetic lipid bilayer on silicon submicrometer-sized pores. J Colliod Interface Sci. Apr. 15, 2007;308(2):337-43. Epub Jan. 31, 2007.
Singer et al., Nanopore Based Sequence Specific Detection of Duplex DNA for Genomic Profiling, Jan. 8, 2010, published Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 738-743.
Singh, et al. Synthesis of natural flutimide and analogous fully substituted pyrazine-2,6-diones, endonuclease inhibitors of influenza virus. J Org Chem. Aug. 10, 2001;66(16):5504-16.
Smith, et al. Overstretching B-DNA: the elastic response of individual double-stranded and single-stranded DNA molecules. Science. Feb. 9, 1996;271(5250):795-9.
Stanford, et al. Transport of DNA through a single nanometer-scale pore: evolution of signal structure. IEEE Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics. Baltimore, MD. May 26, 2004.
Stanford, et al. Using HMMs to Quantify Signals from DNA Driven Through a Nanometer-Scale Pore. IEEE Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics. Raleigh, NC. Oct. 2002; 11-13.
Stefureac, et al. Nanopore analysis of the interaction of metal ions with prion proteins and peptides. Biochem Cell Biol. Apr. 2010;88(2):347-58.
Stefureac, et al. Transport of alpha-helical peptides through alpha-hemolysin and aerolysis pores. Biochemistry. Aug. 1, 2006;45(30):9172-9.
Stoddart, et al. Nucleobase recognition in ssDNA at the central constriction of the alpha-hemolysin pore. Nano Lett. Sep. 8, 2010;10(9):3633-7.
Stoddart, et al. Single-nucleotide discrimination in immobilized DNA oligonucleotides with a biological nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 12, 2009;106(19):7702-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901054106. Epub Apr. 20, 2009.
Storm, et al. Translocation of double-strand DNA through a silicon oxide nanopore. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. May 2005;71(5 Pt 1):051903. Epub May 6, 2005.
Streater, et al. Novel 3-hydroxy-2(1 H)-pyridinones. Synthesis, iron(III)-chelating properties, and biological activity. J Med Chem. Jun. 1990;33(6):1749-55.
Studer, et al. Formation of individual protein channels in lipid bilayers suspended in nanopores. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. Oct. 15, 2009;73(2):325-31. Epub Jun. 10, 2009.
Suzuki, et al. Highly reproducible method of planar lipid bilayer reconstitution in polymethyl methacrylate chip. Langmuir. Feb. 14, 2006;22(4):1937-42.
Thei et al., Parallel Recording of Single Ion Channels: A Heterogeneous System Approach, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, vol. 9, No. 3, May 2010.
Thomson et al. Preliminary nanopore cheminformatics analysis of aptamer-target binding strength. BMC Bioinformatics. Nov. 1, 2007;8 Suppl 7:S11.
Timp et al. “Nanopore sequencing: electrical measurements of the code of life.” Nanotechnology, IEEE Transactions on 9.3 (2010): 281-294.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/170,729, filed Apr. 20, 2009.
UK search and examination report dated Feb. 25, 2013 for GB Application No. 1216656.7.
UK search and examination report dated May 1, 2013 for GB Application No. 1216026.3.
Venkatesan et al. “Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis.” Nature nanotechnology 6.10 (2011): 615-624.
Vercoutere et al., “Discrimination among individual Watson-Crick base pairs at the termini of single DNA hairpin molecules,” Nucleic Acids Research (2003), pp. 1311-1318, vol. 31.
Vercoutere et al., “Rapid discrimination among individual DNA hairpin molecules at single-nucleotide resolution using an ion channel,” Nature Biotechnology (Mar. 2001) pp. 248-252, vol. 19.
Viasnoff, et al. Probing DNA base pairing energy profiles using a nanopore. Eur Biophys J. Feb. 2009;38(2):263-9. Epub Oct. 3, 2008.
Wang, et al. DNA heterogeneity and phosphorylation unveiled by single-molecule electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 14, 2004;101(37):13472-7. Epub Sep. 1, 2004.
Wanunu, et al. DNA profiling using solid-state nanopores: detection of DNA-binding molecules. Nano Lett. Oct. 2009;9(10):3498-502.
Weng, et al. Fluid biomembranes supported on nanoporous aerogel/xerogel substrates. Langmuir. Aug. 17, 2004;20(17):7232-9.
Wilson, et al. Electronic control of DNA polymerase binding and unbinding to single DNA molecules. ACS Nan. Apr. 28, 2009;3(4):995-1003.
Wilson, et al. Feedback control of a DNA molecule tethered in a nanopore to repeatedly probe DNA-binding enzymes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5745-8.
Winters-Hilt, et al. Nanopore-based kinetics analysis of individual antibody-channel and antibody-antigen interactions. BMC Bioinformatics. Nov. 1, 2007;8 Suppl 7:S20.
Woodside, et al. Direct measurement of the full, sequence-dependent folding landscape of a nucleic acid. Science. Nov. 10, 2006;314(5801):1001-4.
Woodside, et al. Nanomechanical measurements of the sequence-depepndent folding landscapes of single nucleic acid hairpins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 18, 2006;103(16):6190-5. Epub Apr. 10, 2006.
WP Thompson Letter May 28, 2013.
Wu, et al. Single-molecule detection of nitrogen mustards by covalent reaction within a protein nanopore. J Am Chem Soc. May 28, 2008;130(21):6813-9. Epub Apr. 30, 2008.
Zeineldin, et al. Using bicellar mixtures to form supported and suspended lipid bilayers on silicon chips. Langmuir. Sep. 12, 2006;22(19):8163-8.
Zwolak, et al. Electronic signature of DNA nucleotides via transverse transport. Nano Letters. Mar. 2005;5(3):421-4.
Chen et al., Probing Single DNA Molecule Transport using Fabricated Nanopores, (Nano Lett, 2004, 4(11), pp. 2293-2298).
Axopatch 2008 Patch Clamp Theory and Operation, Mar. 1999 (Year: 1999).
Jiang et al. “Fabrication of sponge-like nanoporous platinum electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction through alloying and dealloying processes.” Journal of University of Science and Technology of China. Jun. 30, 2008. vol. 38 No. 5. pp. 614-622.
Kumar, et al. PEG-labeled nucleotides and nanopore detection for single molecule DNA sequencing by synthesis. Sci Rep. 2012;2:684. Epub Sep. 21, 2012.
Wang et al., An Intergrated, Low Noise Patch-Clamp Amplifier for Biological Nanopore Applications, 32nd Annual International Conference of IEEE EMBS, Buenos Aires, Argentina Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180100827 A1 Apr 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61435700 Jan 2011 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14558268 Dec 2014 US
Child 15819994 US
Parent 13272128 Oct 2011 US
Child 14558268 US