1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to open or endoscopic surgical instruments and methods for treating tissue. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a system and method for determining proximity of a surgical device relative to nerve tissue by monitoring nerve responses.
2. Background of Related Art
A hemostat or forceps is a simple plier-like tool that uses mechanical action between its jaws to constrict vessels and is commonly used in open surgical procedures to grasp, dissect and/or clamp tissue. Electrosurgical forceps utilize both mechanical clamping action and electrical energy to effect hemostasis by heating the tissue and blood vessels to coagulate, cauterize and/or seal tissue.
Over the last several decades, more and more surgeons are complementing traditional open methods of gaining access to vital organs and body cavities with endoscopes and endoscopic instruments that access organs through small puncture-like incisions. Endoscopic instruments are inserted into the patient through a cannula, or port, that has been made with a trocar. Typical sizes for cannulas range from three millimeters to twelve millimeters. Smaller cannulas are usually preferred, which, as can be appreciated, ultimately presents a design challenge to instrument manufacturers who must find ways to make surgical instruments that fit through the cannulas.
As mentioned above, by utilizing an electrosurgical instrument, a surgeon can either cauterize, coagulate/desiccate and/or simply reduce or slow bleeding, by controlling the intensity, frequency and duration of the electrosurgical energy applied through the jaw members to the tissue. The electrode of each jaw member is charged to a different electric potential such that when the jaw members grasp tissue, electrical energy can be selectively transferred through the tissue.
Bipolar electrosurgical instruments are known in the art, as are other electrosurgical instruments. Commonly-owned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007-0062017, discloses a bipolar electrosurgical instrument. Conventional bipolar electrosurgical instruments may include a cutting blade, fluid applicator, stapling mechanism or other like feature, in various combinations.
Different types of anatomical structures, i.e. vessels, ducts, organs, may require different energy delivery configurations to effect proper treatment. While a specific energy delivery configuration may be adequate for treating an artery or vein, the same energy delivery configuration may not be suitable for treating a duct. Also, if a surgical device is too close to a non-target nerve structure when energy is supplied to the surgical device, then the nerve structure may be damaged.
During certain procedures, surgeons must identify critical anatomical structures such as large vasculature or urinary or bile ducts. These structures typically need to be avoided or ligated during a procedure, thus requiring a high degree of confidence when identifying such structures.
One complication during laparoscopic procedures in particular, is inadvertently engaging nearby critical anatomical structures due to quick or abrupt movement of instruments within the surgical site, poor visibility, lack of tactile response, confusion of the anatomy from patient to patient, or inadequate control of the instrumentation being utilized to perform the procedure. For example, when performing a thyroidectomy to remove a thyroid gland, the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) needs to be located and preserved. The RLN controls motor function and sensation of larynx (voice box). Identifying and avoiding this structure is important for a successful surgical outcome.
Traditional methods for identifying anatomical structures within the body are based on sensing physical characteristics or physiological attributes of body tissue, and then distinguishing normal from abnormal states from changes in the characteristic or attribute. For example X-ray techniques measure tissue physical density, ultrasound measures acoustic density, and thermal sensing techniques measures differences in tissue heat.
Signature properties of nerve structures such as electrical conductivity, impedance, thermal conductivity, permittivity, and capacitance may be measured and compared to known data to determine proximity of the non-target nerve structure to the surgical device and to distinguish anatomical structures from other anatomical structures and/or known data. If these signature properties can be properly elicited from a nerve structure, measureable values that correspond to these elicited properties may be calculated and compared to known values for purposes of identifying and detecting proximity to the nerve structure.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for determining proximity of a surgical device relative to nerve structure includes at least one surgical device having a sensor assembly operably coupled to a processing unit. The sensor assembly is configured to transmit at least one electrical signal generated by the processing unit through nerve structure to elicit a measurable response there from. The processing unit is configured to calculate a signature property value of nerve structure based on the measurable response and to determine proximity of the at least one surgical device relative to the target anatomical structure based on a comparison between the signature property value and at least one other signature property.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for determining proximity of a surgical device relative to nerve structure includes the steps of placing at least one surgical device having a sensor assembly disposed thereon relative to a target anatomical structure and transmitting at least one electrical signal from the sensor assembly to elicit a measurable response from nerve structure. The method also includes the steps of calculating one or more signature properties of nerve structure based on the measureable response and comparing values of the one or more measured signature properties to at least one other measured signature property. The method also includes the step of determining proximity of the at least one surgical device relative to nerve structure based on the comparison between the one or more measured signature properties and at least one other measured signature property.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for determining proximity of nerve structure during an electrosurgical procedure includes the steps of placing at least one surgical device having a sensor assembly disposed thereon relative to a target anatomical structure and transmitting at least one electrical signal from the sensor assembly to elicit a measurable response from nerve structure. The method also includes the steps of calculating a signature property of nerve structure based on the measureable response and determining proximity of the surgical device to nerve structure based on the measurable response. The method also includes the step of selectively applying energy to the target anatomical structure to perform electrosurgical procedure in response to determining proximity of the surgical device is not too close to the nerve structure.
Various embodiments of the subject instrument are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:
Particular embodiments of the present disclosure are described hereinbelow with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following description, well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to avoid obscuring the present disclosure in unnecessary detail.
An electrosurgical generator according to the present disclosure can perform monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical procedures, including anatomical tissue ligation procedures. The generator may include a plurality of outputs for interfacing with various bipolar and monopolar electrosurgical instruments (e.g., laparoscopic electrodes, return electrodes, electrosurgical forceps, footswitches, etc.). Further, the generator includes electronic circuitry configured to generate electrosurgical energy (e.g., RF, microwave, ultrasonic, etc.) specifically suited for various electrosurgical modes (e.g., cut, coagulate (fulgurate), desiccate, etc.) and procedures (e.g., ablation, vessel sealing, etc.).
The present disclosure generally relates to a system for identifying a nerve structure, which may be included in an existing surgical device, e.g. forceps, a monpolar electrode, or articulating robotic (automatic) instruments or systems, or a stand alone device. The system transmits one or more electrical signals from a sensor assembly disposed on one or more surgical instruments through the nerve structure to elicit a measureable response therefrom. The one or more electrical signals may be sent periodically, continuously, and/or selected by a user. Based on the response, the system calculates one or more signature property values of the nerve structure and compares these values to known signature property values of various structures from which a measurable response has been elicited. Based on the comparison, the system identifies and determines proximity of the surgical device to the nerve structure and alerts a user of the system as to the distance of the nerve structure relative to the sensor assembly of the surgical device. Additionally, after a surgical procedure is performed, the nerve structure may be tested to ensure the nerve was not damaged by the surgical procedure. The nerve may be tested by sending a small electrical pulse from the surgical device and measuring the response received from the nerve structure.
Turning now to
Examples of forceps are shown and described in commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/369,894 entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER AND METHOD MANUFACTURING SAME” and commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/460,926 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,156,846) entitled “VESSEL SEALER AND DIVIDER FOR USE WITH SMALL TROCARS AND CANNULAS”.
Although the following disclosure focuses predominately on discussion of electrosurgical instruments for use in connection with endoscopic surgical procedures, open type instruments are also contemplated for use in connection with traditional open surgical procedures. Additionally and as discussed in greater detail below, the aspects of the present disclosure may be incorporated into any suitable electrosurgical instrument (e.g., instrument 2, forceps 10) or any suitable non-electrosurgical instrument (e.g., probes, graspers, prods, clamps, grips, forceps, pliers, cutters, electrocautery devices, etc.).
The generator 20 may include a plurality of connectors to accommodate various types of electrosurgical instruments (e.g., instrument 2, electrosurgical forceps 10, etc.). Further, the generator 20 may operate in monopolar or bipolar modes by including a switching mechanism (e.g., relays) to switch the supply of electrosurgical energy between the connectors, such that, for instance, when the monopolar type instrument 2 is connected to the generator 20, only the monopolar plug receives electrosurgical energy.
The controller 24 includes a processing unit 25 operably connected to a memory 26, which may be a volatile type memory (e.g., RAM) and/or a non-volatile type memory (e.g., flash media, disk media, etc.). The processing unit 25 may be any logic processor or analog circuitry (e.g., microprocessor, control circuit, etc.) adapted to perform the calculations discussed in the present disclosure. The processing unit 25 includes an output port that is operably connected to the HVPS 27 and/or the energy output stage 28 allowing the processing unit 25 to control the output of the generator 20 according to either open and/or closed control loop schemes.
A closed loop control scheme generally includes a feedback control loop wherein the sensor module 23 provides feedback to the controller 24 (e.g., information obtained from one or more sensing mechanisms that sense various parameters such as impedance, temperature, tissue conductivity, permittivity, output current, and/or voltage, etc.). The controller 24 then signals the power supply 27, which then adjusts the DC power supplied to the RF output stage 28, accordingly. The controller 24 also receives input signals from the input controls of the generator 20 and/or instrument 2 or forceps 10. The controller 24 utilizes the input signals to adjust the power output of the generator 20 and/or instructs the generator 20 to perform other control functions. In some embodiments, the generator 20 may utilize audio-based and/or a video-based display to inform the user of the sensed tissue parameters in the field of view of the one or more sensing mechanisms.
The processing unit 25 is capable of executing software instructions for processing data received by the sensor module 23, and for outputting control signals to the generator 20 or other suitable operating room devices (e.g., camera monitor, video display, audio output, etc.), accordingly. The software instructions, which are executable by the controller 24, are stored in the memory 26 of the controller 24. The controller 24 may include analog and/or logic circuitry for processing the sensed values and determining the control signals that are sent to the generator 20, rather than, or in combination with, the processing unit 25.
In some embodiments, generator 20 and processing unit 25 may be separate stand-alone units operably connected to each other (not shown) or processing unit 25 may be incorporated within generator 20, as shown in
Processing unit 25 is operably connected to an electrode or sensor assembly that includes one or more transmitting electrodes 50a and one or more receiving electrodes 50b. The sensor assembly (hereinafter referred to as “sensor assembly 50a, 50b”) may be mounted on one or more suitable electrosurgical instruments such as, for example, monopolar instrument 2 or forceps 10, or on one or more suitable non-electrosurgical instruments such as, for example, a grasper, a dissector, a probe, or a catheter (not shown). In this scenario, the generator 20 may include a plurality of connectors to accommodate non-electrosurgical instruments such that a sensor assembly 50a, 50b mounted to such an instrument may communicate with the generator 20 and/or the processing unit 25 for purposes of identifying target anatomical structures.
Sensor assembly 50a, 50b is configured to sense and/or measure various properties of nerve structures such as, without limitation, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, fluid flow, temperature, capacitance, permittivity, voltage, current, optical-based information, etc. With these purposes in mind, sensor assembly 50a, 50b may be embodied as an impedance sensor, a temperature sensor, an optical sensor, a capacitance sensor, a permittivity sensor, a voltage sensor, a current sensor, a pressure sensor, or a combination of any two or more thereof.
In some embodiments, sensor assembly 50a, 50b may be mounted on a distal end of one or more electrosurgical and/or non-electrosurgical instruments such that the sensor assembly 50a, 50b may be used to sense ahead to the area that the user is moving the treatment device (e.g., instrument 2, forceps 10) to prevent incidental contact between surgical instruments and critical nerve structures, as discussed hereinabove.
In certain embodiments, the transmitting electrode 50a and the receiving electrode 50b may be substituted by the active electrodes (e.g., 112, 122) of an electrosurgical instrument utilized in the procedure such as forceps 10, shown by way of example in
In use, a predetermined energy signal is periodically produced by the processing unit 25 and applied to the patient P through the transmitting electrode 50a, 112 and received by the receiving electrode 50b, 122. The resultant response from a nerve structure or other anatomical structure is processed by the processing unit 25 and is then measured and converted into a value of to determine proximity and/or identity of the nerve structure or other anatomical structure. For example, and without limitation, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, hydraulic conductivity, impedance, capacitance, and permittivity are all signature properties by which a nerve structure may be used in determining proximity.
In operation of one embodiment of the present disclosure, sensor assembly 50a, 50b is placed in contact with or in proximity to where the surgical procedure is performed. Processing unit 25 produces an electric signal that is directed around the surgical device through transmitting electrode 50a. Processing unit 25 may be configured to continuously or periodically produce a signal, or instead the instrument being utilized (e.g., bipolar forceps 10) may include a button or lever 124 mounted on housing 15 and/or generator 20 (
Additionally, electrodes 50a and 50b may be used to identify a target anatomical structure, then a treatment device such as bipolar forceps 10 may operate as a conventional bipolar vessel sealer. The energy delivery configuration of generator 20 may be adjusted in accordance with the identified anatomical structure being treated. The closure pressure of the opposing jaw members 110, 120 may also be adjusted in view of the anatomical structure being sealed.
The electrical current produced by the processing unit 25 may vary depending on the type of tissue and/or the anatomical structure (e.g., duct, vasculature, vessel, organ, etc.) being identified. Processing unit 25 is configured to produce AC and/or DC current. Processing unit 25 may be configured to generate an electrical signal having a frequency ranging from RF (100 kHz) freq. upwards of microwaves (low MHz to GHz) freq. More specifically, the processing unit can generate an electrical signal from about 20 Hz to about 3.3 MHz. Depending on the application, processing unit 25 may produce a signal of constant frequency, a cascaded pulse interrogation signal (e.g., a cosign-shaped pulse), or may instead perform a frequency sweep or amplitude sweep.
More than one sensor assembly 50a, 50b may be connected to the processing unit 25. In this manner, the one or more sensor assemblies 50a, 50b of a particular instrument may include different electrode configurations depending on the anatomical structure being treated on and/or signal frequency being tested. Processing unit 25 may include any suitable methods of increasing the accuracy and consistency of the signature tissue property measurements, e.g., filters and multi-frequency readings.
Processing unit 25 may operate in a number of modes. For example, processing unit 25 may be configured to alert a user when sensor assembly 50a, 50b has contacted a specific nerve structure (e.g., vasculature, duct, vessel, tissue, organ, etc.). In this manner, a user would set processing unit 25 to scan for a particular signature property (e.g., electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, capacitance, impedance, etc.). Processing unit 25 produces an electrical signal configured to best identify the signature tissue property and/or a known nerve structure inadvertently damaged during a surgical procedure. The electrical signal produced by processing unit 25 may be manually determined by the user or may instead be automatically determined by processing unit 25. The electrical signal produced may include a specific frequency or range of frequencies and/or may include a specific signal configuration. Sensor assembly 50a, 50b may be placed in contact over a portion of tissue or in close proximity thereto. As sensor assembly 50a, 50b contacts or approaches a nerve structure 310, 315, or 330, as determined by processing unit 25, processing unit 25 may alert the user. The alert may be audio and/or visual. With this purpose in mind, an audio and/or visual indicator 22 (
One example procedure where determining location of the surgical device 2, or 10 relative to a nerve structure is important is a thyroidectomy procedure to remove a thyroid gland from a patient. By way of example,
Turning now to
Additionally, the signal sent from the generator 20 through sensor 50a can be used to identify the thyroid gland 320 from the trachea 340, superior thyroid artery 325, the inferior thyroid artery 322, or any nerve structure 310, 315, or 330.
Alternatively,
Referring now to
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of a U.S. application Ser. No. 12/720,881 entitled “System and Method for Determining Proximity Relative to a Critical Structure” filed on Mar. 10, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4543959 | Sepponen | Oct 1985 | A |
4962766 | Herzon | Oct 1990 | A |
5080104 | Marks et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5284154 | Raymond et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5762609 | Benaron | Jun 1998 | A |
5800350 | Coppleson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5928158 | Aristides | Jul 1999 | A |
6109268 | Thapliyal | Aug 2000 | A |
6241725 | Cosman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264653 | Falwell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6355032 | Hovda et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6428537 | Swanson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466817 | Kaula et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6546270 | Goldin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569160 | Goldin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6760616 | Hoey et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7089045 | Fuimaono et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099712 | Fuimaono et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7155270 | Solis et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7207989 | Pike, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7228164 | Fuimaono et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257434 | Fuimaono et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257435 | Plaza | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7302285 | Fuimaono et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7522953 | Kaula et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7819860 | Wittenberger et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8050769 | Gharib et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068912 | Kaula et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20030045798 | Hular et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045808 | Kaula et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050027199 | Clarke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060106375 | Werneth et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060241577 | Balbierz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016097 | Farquhar et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070066971 | Podhajsky | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106289 | O'Sullivan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156128 | Jimenez | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070248254 | Mysore Siddu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080281313 | Fagin et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090163904 | Miller et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090204016 | Gharib et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090267773 | Markowitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275827 | Aiken | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110224543 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224668 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110270121 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110275952 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1181895 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1946713 | Jul 2008 | EP |
WO 2006042117 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Copy of International Search Report from European Application No. 11157635 date of completion Jul. 25, 2011. |
European Search Report No. 11157632.8 dated Aug. 8, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110270121 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12720881 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13179728 | US |