The present document relates to the determination of the angular setting of an annular row of stator vanes arranged downstream of a pusher propeller in a propulsion system of an aircraft.
Conventionally, an aircraft, as illustrated in
It is known to achieve an angular setting of the vanes of the pusher propeller 4 in order to optimise propulsion of the aircraft. While the setting of the stator vanes 6 is also known, however, no details are given regarding the method and calculations required to achieve an optimised angular setting of said annular row of stator vanes 6 as a function of the flight phase. The implementation of control laws for said angular setting is complex and there is no optimised, simple and effective system for angularly setting an annular row of stator vanes 6 arranged downstream of a pusher propeller 4 of an aircraft propulsion system, which propeller is also a variable-pitch propeller.
This document aims to address these drawbacks in a simple, reliable and cost-effective way.
The present document relates to a method for determining the angular setting of an annular row of stator vanes arranged downstream of a pusher propeller of a propulsion system with a longitudinal axis, said annular row of stator vanes receiving an air flow having a velocity V2 including a longitudinal component Viz and a tangential component Viθ associated with the velocity of gyration generated by the pusher propeller, the method comprising the steps:
where
ρ corresponds to the density of an ambient air,
V0 corresponds to a flight velocity of said propulsion system,
N1 corresponds to said mechanical speed of said pusher propeller,
D1 corresponds to a diameter of said pusher propeller,
P1 corresponds to said power of said pusher propeller,
T1 corresponds to a pull of said pusher propeller;
A database is pre-constructed so as to facilitate real-time angular setting as a function of the position of the pusher propeller. Indeed, from a power and a mechanical speed associated with said pusher propeller, from a velocity of the airflow incident on the pusher propeller, from the altitude of said propulsion system and from ambient temperature, the angular setting of the pusher propeller is obtained and the method makes it possible, subsequently, to determine the optimum angular setting of each of the stator vanes from the database.
The way of determining the angular setting to be applied to said annular row of stator vanes provided herein makes the control of said annular row of stator vanes easier to implement, more robust to changes in flight conditions such as the velocity of the airflow incident on the pusher propeller, the altitude of said propulsion system and ambient temperature. Ambient temperature here refers to the surrounding temperature in which the propulsion system is immersed.
It is possible to obtain an optimum thrust of the propulsion system by virtue of the optimum angular setting of said annular row of stator vanes as a function of the setting of the pusher propeller.
Said axial component Viz of said velocity V2 of the airflow incident on the annular row of stator vanes can be calculated from the following formula:
where K1 is a constant related to the radial dimension of the pusher propeller.
Said tangential component Viθ of said velocity V2 of the airflow incident on the annular row of stator vanes can be calculated from the following formula:
where K1 and K2 are constants related to the radial dimension of the pusher propeller.
Said angle φ12 can obey the following formula:
Said angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes may be communicated by a FADEC system to actuators which control the angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes. By the way it works, the present method requires less data and is therefore easier to implement in a calculator such as a FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control).
The database may be a table constructed by simulation or testing in which several operating conditions are calculated from all combinations of parameters such as the rotor speed N1, flight Mach number, angular setting β1 of the pusher propeller and angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes, giving a table of maximised pull coefficient C′T,2 as a function of the flight Mach number, angle φ12 and angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes. The advantage of this database is that it allows very quick access to the information. Indeed, once said database has been created, a simple reading of the optimum value of the angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes is necessary. The database as it is constituted is lighter and can therefore be integrated into the FADEC.
In such a configuration, as illustrated in
The angle φ12 between said velocity of the airflow incident on said annular row of stator vanes 6 and a plane of rotation 8 of said pusher propeller 4 is very important for defining the aerodynamic performance of the annular row of stator vanes 6. In combination with the angular setting β2 to be applied to said annular row of stator vanes 6, the angle φ12 defines the angle of attack. If the angle of attack is too high, a stall of the annular row of stator vanes 6 is observed. This stall results in a high level of pressure loss and significant gyration, which reduces the propulsive efficiency of the pusher propeller 4.
The angle of attack therefore has to remain within an acceptable range defined according to the aerodynamic robustness of the profile used, known at the time of its design. Furthermore, there is an optimum angle of attack for which the performance of the annular row of stator vanes 6 is maximum. In order to optimise performance of the propulsion system 1, it is therefore necessary to be close to this angle of attack during the entire flight phase. The angular setting β2 to be applied to said annular row of stator vanes 6 therefore has to be controlled by said angle φ12.
Thus, the present document provides an efficient way to combine the parameters influencing the aerodynamics of said pusher propeller 4 and the annular row of stator vanes 6 in order to determine the angular setting β2 of the annular row of stator vanes 6 as a function of only two parameters, namely said angle φ12 and a Mach number 10 associated with the velocity of the airflow incident on the pusher propeller 4.
Said method 12 comprises a first step of establishing a theoretical model 14 of the pusher propeller 4. For this, a power P1 and a mechanical speed N1 associated with said pusher propeller, and flight conditions 16 comprising a velocity V0 of the airflow incident on the pusher propeller, the altitude of said propulsion system and ambient temperature are used as an input to said theoretical model of the pusher propeller. This theoretical model 14 of the pusher propeller 4 makes it possible to determine an angular setting β1 of said pusher propeller 4. Said pusher propeller is thus modelled by means of said theoretical model, which is in the form of a table comprising a set of dimensionless coefficients, comprising an advance ratio J1, a power coefficient Cp,1 and a pull coefficient CT,1 defined for a plurality of angular settings β1 of said pusher propeller 4, for a plurality of velocities V0 of incident airflow. As an output of the theoretical model 14 of the pusher propeller, the dimensionless parameters 17 including at least the power coefficient Cp,1, the pull coefficient CT,1 and the advance ratio J1 of said pusher propeller 4 may be used and will be defined by the following formulae:
where ρ corresponds to the density of an ambient air, V0 corresponds to a flight velocity of said propulsion system, N1 corresponds to said mechanical speed of said pusher propeller, D1 corresponds to a diameter of said pusher propeller, P1 corresponds to said power of said pusher propeller, T1 corresponds to a pull of said pusher propeller.
These dimensionless parameters 17 associated with the pusher propeller 4 are then communicated to a setting model of the annular row of stator vanes 18, as shown in
where K1 is a constant related to the radial dimension of the pusher propeller 4 and:
where K1 and K2 are constants related to the radial dimension of the pusher propeller 4.
Said angle φ12 is then obtained from said longitudinal velocity Viz and tangential component Viθ according to the following relationship:
A database 20 is constructed beforehand. It allows each said angle φ12 to be associated with different angular settings β2 of said annular row of stator vanes 6 obtained for different Mach numbers.
To implement said database 20, a pull coefficient C′T-2 of the straightener is calculated from the following formula:
where D2 corresponds to a diameter of said annular row of stator vanes 6, T2 corresponds to a pull of said annular row of stator vanes 6, and V2 corresponds to the velocity received by said annular row of stator vanes 6. This pull coefficient is necessary to create the database.
The database is a table which associates with each Mach number and angle φ12 a value of angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes 6. This database is constructed by simulation or by testing. Several operating conditions associated with all combinations of parameters are calculated. The parameters considered are: the rotor speed N1, flight Mach number, angular setting β1 of the pusher propeller 4 and angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes 6. For each of these operating points, the angle φ12 and pull coefficient C′T,2 are calculated. This gives a table of pull coefficient C′T,2 as a function of the flight Mach number, angle φ12 and angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes 6. For each flight Mach number and angle φ12 in this table, the value of angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes 6 which maximises the coefficient C′T,2 is chosen. Thus, the control law in the form of the angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes 6 as a function of Mach number and angle φ12 is obtained.
The creation of a database as described above makes it possible to quickly and simply perform the determination of the optimum value of the angular setting β2 to be applied to said annular row of stator vanes. This database can be integrated into a memory unit of the FADEC which does not require the addition of complex calculation means.
From this database 20, said angle φ12 and a Mach number 10 associated with the velocity of the airflow incident on the pusher propeller, an angular setting β2 to be applied to said annular row of stator vanes 6 is determined.
Finally, said angular setting β2 of said annular row of stator vanes 6 is communicated by a FADEC system to actuators which control the setting of said annular row of stator vanes 6.
The system and logic provided herein make the determination of the angular setting β2 of the annular row of stator vanes row easier to implement, more robust to changes in flight conditions 16 and easier to store in a FADEC, as said method 12 requires less data. As a result of this determination of the angular setting β2, the annular row of stator vanes 6 always provides the optimum amount of thrust for the given flight phase.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2003639 | Apr 2020 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2021/050636 | 4/9/2021 | WO |