A number of significant technology developments have occurred in the past few years that have enabled the digital playback and display of feature films at a level of quality commensurate with that of 35 mm film release prints. These technology developments include the introduction of high resolution film scanners, digital image compression, high speed data networking and storage, and advanced digital projection. These digital cinema systems are local, in-cinema playback and display systems.
While these systems are effective in-cinema, there has not previously existed a system that would enable secure and effective distribution of digital media to exhibitors.
The above-described and other problems and deficiencies of the prior art are overcome and alleviated by the presently described system for distributing digital media to exhibitors. This system enables distribution by utilizing media content booking, media content packaging, encryption, and delivery components.
In exemplary embodiments, a packaging platform and a movie cryptographic administration platform interact to generate and provide distributed content. An exemplary packaging platform may transform digital cinema digital masters (DCDMs) into encrypted digital cinema packages (DCPs), which may be distributed and viewed at remote locations. An exemplary packaging component may watermark, compress and or encrypt various movie components, such as picture, sound and subtitles together or separately, for example in a material exchange format (MXF). Also, various versions of such components may be generated (e.g., excluding video content, substituting video content, various sound or subtitling content, etc.). Thus, in exemplary embodiments, digital distribution to theaters may comprise multiple MXF files (e.g., one or more specified picture files, sound files, and/or subtitle files) as well as other files. Such other files may comprise one or more of, e.g., a packaging list (PKL) file, an asset map (AST) file, and a composition playlist (CPL) file, which includes appropriate assembly instructions for proper playback of a movie version.
For booking and delivery of a movie version, in exemplary embodiments, a central component interfaces with a booking system to establish booking information. The interaction establishes booking information including the type of digital media an exhibitor can display, the version and final booking data. The content is encrypted, and the central component generates encryption keys necessary to exhibit the digital media. The encryption is performed so that the exhibitor must obtain a corresponding key for that exhibitor and that booking in order to access the digital media.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like elements are numbered alike in the following FIGURE:
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated by the accompanying drawing.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The packaging platform 16 may also have independent and/or secure access to a digital encryption key platform (KDM proxy (knowledge discovery meta-model)) 18 to permit authorized personnel to manipulate the encrypted MXF files. In an exemplary embodiment, the KDM automatically provides keys to authorized users or workstations when manipulation of MXF files is performed within a secure environment (such that authorized users may work with MXFs, edit instructions for manipulating MXFs and arrange plural MXFs without the perceived need to request authorized keys from the KDM).
The packaging platform 16 ultimately generates packaging instructions (CPL) 20 for generating one or more movie versions 22. Thus, a version 22 of a movie that ultimately is distributed to an auditorium 12 may comprise multiple MXFs and a composition playlist (CPL) (assembly instructions). Other files may also be transmitted, such as a packaging list (PKL) and/or an asset map (AST). The CPL chooses which MXFs will be displayed and when such MXFs will be displayed (at the same time, but potentially offset relative to one another).
While not specifically illustrated in
As is noted, the exemplary CPL is a set of pointers or instructions relative to possible sets of MXFs. Thus, “generation” of a CPL may be likened to generation of a modifiable set of rules rather than generation of a final movie version. This is advantageous from a user interface perspective, since the user need not worry about the technical aspects of offsetting, editing and/or merging documents, but is instead allowed to manipulate possible combinations (in some cases with sliding and drag and drop type interfaces) without actually creating a final movie form (essentially creating new CPLs dynamically responding to user manipulation of the interface). Referring again to
In exemplary embodiments, the user-friendly interface may be provided by configuring a local webpage for controlling a set of devices with device controllers that are cloned to the web server for editing such files. In such cases, existing web interface rules may be used by keeping a running time code, with for example two or three devices linked to the web interface output that can control the devices and players. In such a way, the files and/or file names need not even be viewed, and instead, the files may be abstracted as assets.
Referring again to
In exemplary embodiments (where one cares about maintaining the security of master copies) both the booking and delivery and the packaging platforms rely on interaction with the KDM component. As was also described above, where a packaging process is performed in a secure, authorized environment, encryption keys may be generated as a matter of course, without specific authorization having been scheduled. However, with a booking of, e.g., an auditorium, KDMs should be generated with particularity if the greatest measure of security is desired.
Referring to
Where maximum security is desired, KDM distribution is dependent upon delivery to a trusted device 98 within the device configuration 100 of the auditorium 12. That is, the destination must have a trusted authorized certificate in order for KDM delivery to occur. In exemplary embodiments, external service providers 102 may be used to scan such devices 98 to verify trust, wherein reported certificates may be compared against the trusted list of roots within the KDM component
As was noted above, in exemplary embodiments relating, e.g. to movie theaters, KDMs are generated for specific bookings, including auditorium, screen number, version, date and duration.
Further, the system may be configured to constantly look to verify the existence of proper KDMs for materials and bookings (e.g., in a left join process to verify key generation). For example, if devices are swapped at the exhibitor end, it is possible that old KDMs are invalid, or that additional fulfillment needs to occur. The system may be configured to continually check to verify that KDMs have been made, are current, and have been delivered. This type of construction also provides the ability to accurately log all KDM conditions, such as is illustrated generally at 110 in
In exemplary embodiments, distribution is provided via a remote access server (RAS), which may be used as a KDM proxy. In exemplary embodiments, a problem arises in circumstances where all third parties utilize the same internet protocol (IP) address (since all third parties must output KDMs). Delivery is an important part of the system, and in exemplary embodiments PPP protocol may be used. If the IP address is the same for all third parties (e.g., all theaters), general conflicts would arise where multiple connections are desired (e.g., establishing 20 connections simultaneously to 20 theaters). Where telephone lines are utilized, the theaters do not have discernible network interface card (NIC) identifiers.
In an exemplary embodiment, such conflicts are resolved by utilizing packet flagging in conjunction with virtual routing tables. By this process, concurrent sessions may be initiated over telephone lines by uniquely targeting specific theaters.
In exemplary embodiments, the system is configured to package digital cinema that may be displayed by exhibitors in a format and/or resolution that is equal to or better than that of traditional 35 mm Answer Print. Also, in exemplary embodiments, the system is based around global standards such that content may be distributed and exhibited anywhere in the world (as can be done with traditional 35 mm print).
In exemplary embodiments, the system is also based upon a discrete component architecture (e.g., Mastering, Compression, Encryption, Transport, Storage, Playback, Projection) that allows for components to be replaced or upgraded without replacement of the entire system.
Also, in exemplary embodiments, the encryption format is a single common encryption format with common keys for decryption of content. The content may be encrypted from the time of encoding in post-production all the way until it is projected on an exhibitor's screen. Decryption keys may be provided only to authorized entities via secure data transmission environments or via physical delivery. In other exemplary embodiments, the system included capacities to renew or replace encryption components in case of a breach of security. In other exemplary embodiments, encryption components are specific to an exhibitor.
In additional exemplary embodiments, packaged digital cinema includes forensic marking of the content for providing traceable forensic evidence in the case of a theft of the content. Such marking may be specific to the system, generally, or specific to the exhibitor.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, while exemplary embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and variations can be made to the system for distributing digital media to exhibitors disclosed herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the various embodiments have been described by way of illustration and not limitation.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/005,260, filed Dec. 4, 2007, the entire contents of which are specifically incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6868403 | Wiser et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
20030204750 | Ng et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030223583 | Stirling et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024652 | Buhse et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20070171374 | Moore et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070220575 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100247070 | Ogura et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1020070089426 | Feb 2006 | KR |
1020070003518 | Jan 2007 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion and International Search Report of the International Searching Authority: PCT/US2008/085511; Jun. 25, 2009. |
Examination Report for Application No. GB1008676.7 dated Jul. 26, 2012, 3 pages. |
J. Hart, et al., Inter-Society Digital Cinema Forum (ISDCF), Digital Cinema Primer, Mar. 2007, http://www.isdcf.com/papers/DigitalCinemaPrimerShoWest2007.pdf, 22 pages. |
GB Application No. GB1300718.2, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 29, 2013, 3 pages. |
Canadian Application No. 2,706,888 Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2015, 3 pages. |
GB Application Nos. GB1008676.7 and GB1300718.2, Decision of Refusal dated Jul. 16, 2013, 11 pages. |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,706,888 Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2016, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090144542 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61005260 | Dec 2007 | US |