Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed generally to a virtual process manager and more particularly, to a virtual process manager configured to download a virtualized application file from a remote server and execute the downloaded file.
Description of the Related Art
A virtual application is a virtual machine image pre-configured with all of the files, registry data, settings, components, runtimes, and other dependencies required for a specific application to execute immediately and without installation on a host computing device. The virtual application is partially isolated from other applications implemented on a host computing device and partially isolated from an underlying host operating system installed and executing on the host computing device. The virtual application is encapsulated from the host operating system by a virtual runtime environment, which includes a virtual operating system, that receives operations performed by the virtualized application and redirects them to one or more virtualized locations (e.g., a virtual filesystem, virtual registry, and the like).
Thus, the virtual application may be conceptualized as including two components: a virtualization runtime and a virtual application configuration. The virtualization runtime implements the virtual runtime environment, which implements various operating system application programming interfaces (“APIs”) in such a way that allows the executing virtual application to access and interact with items that may not be present on the host computer. The virtual application configuration includes data necessary to implement the virtual application within the virtualization runtime.
The virtual application is stored in and implemented by one or more data files and/or executable files. Depending upon the implementation details, the one or more data files and/or executable files storing and implementing the virtual application may include blocks of data corresponding to each application file of a natively installed version of the application. Herein, these blocks of data will be referred to as “virtual application files.” The one or more data files and/or executable files storing and implementing the virtual application also include configuration information. When the virtual application is executed, the configuration information is used to configure the virtual operating system to execute the virtual application. For example, the configuration information may contain information related to the virtual application files, virtual registry entries, environment variables, services, and the like. The virtual operating system is configured to communicate with the host operating system as required to execute the virtual application on the host computing device.
A download manager is a computer program that downloads files from a web server over the Internet. The download manager is separate from a web browser, which is used to navigate to a web page displaying a link to a file stored on the server. When the user clicks on the link to the file, the download manager is launched and manages the download.
Conventional download managers require user interaction and an application installation process. For example, download managers typically require a user to select a storage location on the user's computer into which the file will be downloaded. Then, after the file is downloaded, the download manager typically launches the installation process or the user executes the file separately. Alternatively, a dialog box may ask the user if the user wants to install an application implemented by the downloaded file and/or execute the file. Often, when the user indicates the user wants to execute the application, an installer is launched that installs the application. The installation process often requires additional user interactions, and may be very time consuming, require special permissions to perform the installation, and perform potentially undesirable modifications to the user's computing device. When the installer is finished, the installer may execute the downloaded (and installed) file. However, the user is typically queried a second time as to whether the user would like to execute the file.
Thus, prior art download managers require user interaction after a file is selected for download. Therefore, using conventional download managers is time consuming and requires substantial user interaction. Further, because the user must respond to the questions presented by the download manager, the user must monitor at least a portion of the file transfer.
A need exists for a virtual process manager configured to download and execute a virtual application while requiring less user interaction than prior art download managers. A further need exists for a virtual process manager that more quickly executes virtualized application files stored on a remote server particularly in view of the fact that a virtualized application file need not be installed on the user's computer to execute thereon. A method of launching applications stored on a remote server is also desirable. The present application provides these and other advantages as will be apparent from the following detailed description and accompanying figures.
The present application describes a virtual process manager (referred to as a “Sandbox Manager”) configured to download a virtualized application file from a server computing device to a client computing device operated by a user. The Sandbox Manager does not query the user for any information during the download or execution of the virtualized application file. The user simply selects the virtualized application file for download using a Client Application (such as a web browser or operating system shell) and together the Client Application and the Sandbox Manager effect the transfer of the virtualized application file to the client computing device and the execution of the virtualized application file on the client computing device. Thus, the user need not select a location in which to store the virtualized application file on the client computing device or indicate whether the user would like to execute the virtualized application file. In this manner, the Sandbox Manager may be used to download and execute the virtualized application file in less time than is required using a conventional download manager.
As explained above, a virtualized application file 140 is transferred to the client computing device 9 from the server computing device 7. The virtualized application file 140 is illustrated in dashed lines to indicate that the virtualized application file 140 is stored in the cache 139 during and after the download. However, before the download begins, the virtualized application file 140 is not stored in the cache 139. As will be explained below, the virtualized application file 140 may be an executable file or a file configured to execute within a virtualized environment provided by a virtual machine.
The system memory 22A stores one or more files implementing one or more virtual machines. By way of a non-limiting example, the system memory 22A may include a plurality of virtual machine executable files 137 that when executed, each implement a different virtual machine. For example, each of the virtual machine executable files 137 may implement a different version of the same virtual machine. The virtual machine executable files 137 may be executed individually. When executed, a virtual machine executable file implements a virtualized environment. Execution of a virtual machine executable file may be initiated by the Sandbox Manager 134 using a command including a parameter (e.g., a file path) identifying a virtualized application file to execute. In response to receiving the parameter, the virtual machine executable file executes the identified virtualized application file inside the virtualized environment implemented by the virtual machine executable file. The virtual machine may execute within an operating system shell process. Optionally, the virtual machine executable files 137 may be stored in the cache 139.
The virtualized application file 140 includes a version identifier that may be used by the Sandbox Manager 134 to select which of the virtual machine executable files 137 is configured to execute the virtualized application file 140.
In the embodiment illustrated, the system memory 22B stores web server components 142 configured to implement a web server. The web server components 142 may be configured to provide a web page having one or more links to virtualized application files using standard http protocol. By way of non-limiting examples, the web server components 142 may include Internet Information Services (“IIS”) provided by Microsoft Corporation, Apache, and the like. While illustrated as being outside the filesystem 126B, those of ordinary skill in the art appreciate that the virtualized application file 140 and web server components 142 may be conceptualized as being within the filesystem 126B.
The virtualized application file 140 may include components necessary to implement a virtual runtime environment including a virtual operating system 120 configured to execute in the operating system 35A (see
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/697,029 filed on Jan. 29, 2010 describes a file format that may be used by the virtualized application file 140 and an xlayer file. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/697,029 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The virtual application 110 may be implemented using the virtualized application file 140 and/or one or more xlayer files as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/697,029. The xlayer file cannot be executed directly from the operating system 35A and instead requires the virtual runtime environment supplied at least in part by the virtual operating system 120. The virtual operating system 120 may be supplied by one of the virtual machine executable files 137. Thus, the xlayer file may be executed by one of the virtual machine executable files 137.
The virtual operating system 120 includes a virtual filesystem 150, a virtual registry 152, and a virtual process environment and threading subsystems component 154. When executing, the virtual application 110 interacts with the virtual filesystem 150, virtual registry 152, and virtual process environment and threading subsystems component 154, instead of interacting directly with the filesystem 126A, the registry 128A, and the process environment and threading subsystems component 130A of the operating system 35A illustrated in
The virtual application 110 executes inside a virtual runtime environment provided at least in part by the virtual operating system 120. Some virtual applications require one or more additional runtime environments to execute. For example, to execute a Flash application, the Flash runtime engine must also be installed. Therefore, to virtualize a Flash application, both the Flash application and Flash runtime engine must be included in the virtualized application file 140 and configured to execute in the portions of the virtual runtime environment provided by the virtual operating system 120. Collectively, all runtime components necessary to execute the virtual application 110 will be referred to as a virtual runtime engine. However, those of ordinary skill in the art appreciate that the virtual runtime engine may include only the virtual operating system 120 and components of other additional runtime engines (e.g., the Flash runtime engine) required to execute the virtual application 110 may be loaded separately by the virtual operating system 120. When executed, the virtual runtime engine generates, at least in part, the virtual runtime environment in which the virtual application 110 executes.
The virtualized application file 140 includes a configuration data block 121. The configuration data block 121 may include virtual application files 123A-123C corresponding to each of the application files of a natively installed version of the same application. The virtualized application file 140 identifies one or more of the virtual application files 123A-123C as a startup executable that executes when the virtual application 110 is first executed. The startup executable may be identified in the configuration data block 121.
When the virtualized application file 140 is executed, the configuration data block 121 configures the virtual operating system 120 to execute the virtual application 110. For example, the configuration data block 121 may contain configuration information related to files and directories in the virtual filesystem 150, keys and values in the virtual registry 152, environment variables, services, and the like.
The configuration data block 121 may also include basic application metadata and settings such as the application name, application version, and sandbox location. Further, the configuration data block 121 may provide isolation information to the virtual operating system 120. This information indicates which directories, virtual application files 123A-123C, virtual registry entries, environment variables, and services are to be isolated from the operating system 35A (see
To execute the virtual application 110, an initialization process is first performed. During this process, the virtual operation system 120 is launched and configured by the configuration data block 121. After the initialization process has completed, the appropriate startup executable(s) is/are launched inside the virtual operating system 120. The virtual operating system 120 intercepts calls to the operating system 35A and routes them to corresponding components of the virtual operating system 120. For example, when the virtual application 110 requests access an application file that corresponds to the virtual application file 123A using a path of a natively installed version of the application, the virtual operating system 120 intercepts the request and routes the request to one of the virtual application file 123A. The virtual operating system 120 may also route some requests and actions to the operating system 35A (see
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/188,155, filed on Aug. 7, 2008, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/188,161 filed on Aug. 7, 2008, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/685,576 filed on Jan. 11, 2010, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties, disclose systems that may be used to create and configure the virtualized application file 140. As described in greater detail in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/188,155, 12/188,161, and 12/685,576, the virtualized application file 140 may be created by a virtual application executable constructor or authoring tool 170 using an application template that includes copies of files, such as a configuration file 202, application files 111A-111C, and the like, used to configure the virtualized application file 140. However, the template is not a requirement. Instead, to build the virtualized application file 140, the authoring tool 170 needs only the configuration file 202 and copies of any applications files 111A-111C necessary for a natively installed version of the application to execute. The applications files 111A-111C, and the configuration file 202 are referred to collectively as an application configuration 171. In some embodiments, the authoring tool 170 combines the application configuration 171 and the components of the virtual runtime engine (e.g., the virtual operating system 120) into an executable virtualized application file. However, in other embodiments, the authoring tool 170 omits the components of the virtual runtime engine from the virtualized application file to create a virtualized application file for execution by a virtual machine implemented by a virtual machine executable file, such as one of the virtual machine executable files 137.
For ease of illustration, the authoring tool 170 and the application configuration 171 have been illustrated as being stored in the system memory 22B of the server computing device 7 (see
Returning to
The Client Application 132 translates user commands (button clicks, etc) into requests for operations that the Sandbox Manager 134 performs. In embodiments in which the Client Application 132 is implemented as a web browser, the browser plug-in 136 or other type of translation application may be installed on the client computing device 9 (see
By way of a non-limiting example, the browser plug-in 136 may be installed on the client computing device 9 (see
Once the plug-in 136 has been installed, the plug-in can be used by a website (implemented by the web server components 142 (see
The requests include commands and optionally, one or more parameters. The requests may be implemented as strings, each including a command. If the request also includes parameters, the parameters may be separated from one another and the command by a predetermined character, such as a semi-colon, comma, and the like. In other words, the request may be implemented as a semi-colon delimitated string or a string delimited in another manner. The following Table A provides a list of commands that my be included in a request.
As mentioned above, the Client Application 132 communicates with the Sandbox Manager 134 over the communication link 138, which may be implemented as a TCP connection. By way of a non-limiting example, the Client Application 132 may send the requests as text messages using TCP protocol to the Sandbox Manager 134 over the TCP connection. As described above, each of the requests includes a command and may include one or more parameters (e.g., a parameter list). These commands may be characterized as a communication protocol between the Client Application 132 and the Sandbox Manager 134.
In block 210, the Client Application 132 receives a command from the user via a conventional user interface (e.g., a mouse, keyboard, and the like). The user command instructs the Client Application 132 to download the virtualized application file 140 and/or execute the virtualized application file 140.
The plug-in 136 is configured to request a different session for each virtualized application file being transferred and/or executed. Thus, each virtualized application file being transferred and/or executed may be identified by a unique session identifier.
In decision block 212, the plug-in 136 determines whether a session identifier is associated with the virtualized application file 140. The decision in decision block 212 is “YES” when a session identifier is associated with the virtualized application file 140. The decision in decision block 212 is “NO” when a session identifier is not associated with the virtualized application file 140.
When the decision in decision block 212 is “NO,” in block 214, the plug-in 136 requests a new communication session having a unique session identifier with the Sandbox Manager 134 over the communication link 138. Then, the Client Application 132 advances to block 220.
When the decision in decision block 212 is “YES,” the Client Application 132 advances to block 220.
In block 220, the Client Application 132 translates the user command received in block 210 into a request to be sent to the Sandbox Manager 134 over the communication link 138. For example, in embodiments in which the Client Application 132 is a web browser in which the plug-in 136 is loaded, in block 210, the web browser receives the user command (e.g., the user clicks on a hyperlink, presses a button, and the like) and in block 220, the plug-in 136 translates the user command into a request including a command (e.g., one of the commands listed in Table A above) and optionally, one or more parameters (e.g., the session identifier associated with the virtualized application file 140). The user command may be an instruction to download the virtualized application file 140 (see
Returning to
Returning to
Returning to
Each of the predefined Client Request object types 305 is associated with a particular type of virtualized application file. For example, the Client Request object types 305 include a Client Request object type associated with the virtualized application file 140. The types are used to create a Client Request object for each virtualized application file to be downloaded and/or executed by the Sandbox Manager 134. An object of the Client Request object type associated with the virtualized application file 140 is responsible for managing transfer and execution of the virtualized application file 140, including determining status, managing the cache 139 (see
The Client Request Manager 310 determines whether a Client Request object has been created for a particular virtualized application file associated with a session identifier. If a Client Request object has not been created for a virtualized application file, the Client Request Manager 310 (see
Each of the Client Request objects includes a status field indicating a status related to the transfer and/or execution of the virtualized application file. Table B below provides non-limiting examples of status values or codes that may be stored in the status field.
The status field may be set to “Canceled” when user exits the web page (e.g., browses to another page, closes the browser window, and the like) on which the link to the virtualized application file being downloaded is displayed. By way of a non-limiting example, when the user exits the web page, a cancel call may be created automatically (e.g., by script code executing in the Client Application 132) and sent to the plug-in 136. In response, the plug-in 136 sends a cancel message including the session identifier (e.g., “cancel;<session id>”) to the Sandbox Manager 134 over the communication link 138. If the status value of the status field of the Client Request object including the session identifier in the cancel message is “In Progress,” the transfer is cancelled by the Sandbox Manager 134.
By way of a non-limiting example, the status value of the status field may be determine in the following manner. If the transfer of the virtualized application file has not yet started, the current status is “Not Started.” If the transfer has started and is in progress, the current status is “In Progress.” If the transfer has started, is not in progress, and has completed, the current status is “Complete.” If the transfer has started, is not in progress, has not completed, and has been canceled, the current status is “Canceled.” If the transfer has started, is not in progress, has not completed, has not been canceled, and has encountered an error, the current status is “Error.” Table C below provides a non-limiting example of error codes that may used by the Sandbox Manager 134.
Each of the Client Request objects includes a progress field indicating an amount (e.g., a percentage from 0% to 100%) of the virtualized application file stored in the cache 139 (see
Each of the Client Request objects may include a path to the transferred virtualized application file stored on the cache 139 (see
The Downloader 315 downloads a particular virtualized application file identified by a session identifier.
The Executer 320 executes a particular virtualized application file identified by a session identifier.
Next, in decision block 365, the parameters are validated. By way of a non-limiting example, the parameters may be validated by determining whether the number of parameters matches the number that were expected. The decision in decision block 365 is “YES,” when the parameter are valid (e.g., the number of parameters matches the number that were expected). Thus, if a particular command does not include parameters (e.g., the “ping” command), the decision in decision block 365 is “YES,” if the request does not include any parameters. The decision in decision block 365 is “NO,” when the parameter are invalid (e.g., the number of parameters does not match the number that were expected).
When the decision in decision block 365 is “NO,” in block 366, an error message is sent to the Client Application 132. Then, the method 350 terminates.
When the decision in decision block 365 is “YES,” the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to decision block 367. In decision block 367, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether the request includes a session identifier. The decision in decision block 367 is “YES” when the request includes a session identifier. The decision in decision block 367 is “NO” when the request does not include a session identifier.
When the decision in decision block 367 is “YES,” in block 370, the session identifier is used to identify or locate a Client Request object associated with the session identifier and responsible for downloading and/or executing the virtualized application file identified by the session identifier. The dictionary 330 of the Client Request Manager 310 may be used to lookup the Client Request object associated with the session identifier.
In decision block 375, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether a Client Request object associated with the session identifier has been identified. The decision in decision block 375 is “YES,” when a Client Request object associated with the session identifier has been identified. The decision in decision block 375 is “NO,” when a Client Request object associated with the session identifier has not been identified in block 370.
When the decision in decision block 375 is “NO,” in block 377, the Sandbox Manager 134 sends an error message to the Client Application 132. The error message may include the error indicator “Invalid Session Id” (see Table C above). Then, the method 350 terminates. Thus, if a command is sent to the Sandbox Manager 134 with a session identifier that is not in the dictionary 330, an error is returned to the Client Application 132 and a new request must be sent to the Sandbox Manager 134. For example, if a “status,” “progress,” or “exec” command was received in block 355 including a session identifier not associated with a Client Request object, for the Sandbox Manager 134 to perform the command, the transfer must be started again with a new request including the “start” command.
When the decision in decision block 375 is “YES,” the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to block 380 described below.
When the decision in decision block 367 is “NO,” the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to decision block 385 to determine whether the Sandbox Manager 134 should create a new Client Request object. Referring to Table A above, only two commands listed do not include the session identifier: the “start” command; and the “ping” command. The decision in decision block 385 is “YES” when the command in the request is the “start” command. Otherwise, the decision in decision block 385 is “NO.” Thus, the decision in decision block 385 is “NO” when the request includes the “ping” command.
When the decision in decision block 385 is “YES,” in block 387, the Sandbox Manager 134 creates a new Client Request object and associates the new Client Request object with a session identifier. By way of a non-limiting example, a method call may be made to the Client Request Manager 310 (see
The Client Request Manager 310 includes a Client Request object for each virtualized application file the Sandbox Manager 134 is transferring and/or executing. The Client Request object may be cached in the dictionary 330 of the Client Request Manager 310, which may be configured to provide fast lookup of the Client Request object in response to subsequent requests including the session identifier involving the cached Client Request object. The Client Request object is responsible for managing the transfer of the virtualized application file, status of the transfer, progress of the transfer, execution of the virtualized application file, management of the cache 139 (see
Then, the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to block 380 from block 387. When the decision in decision block 385 is “NO,” the Sandbox Manager 134 also advances to block 380.
In block 380, Sandbox Manager 134 performs the command. If applicable, the command is executed on the Client Request object identified in block 370 or created in block 387. Then, in optional block 390, Sandbox Manager 134 sends information back to the Client Application 132. For example, as discussed below with respect to the method 400 (see
If the command is a “ping” command, in blocks 380 and 390, the Sandbox Manager 134 sends a response to the Client Application 132. If the command is a “start” command, in block 380, the Downloader 315 downloads the virtualized application file 140. If the command is a “status” command, in blocks 380 and 390, the Sandbox Manager 134 obtains the status value from the status field of the Client Request object identified in block 370 or created in block 387 and sends the status value to the Client Application 132. If the command is a “progress” command, in blocks 380 and 390, the Sandbox Manager 134 obtains the progress value from the progress field of the Client Request object identified in block 370 or created in block 387 and sends the progress value to the Client Application 132. If the command is a “exec” command, in block 380, the Executer 320 executes the virtualized application file 140.
In first block 405, the Client Application 132 receives a new user command to download and execute the virtualized application file 140. In block 410, the Client Application 132 sends a request including the “ping” command to the Sandbox Manager 134. The “ping” command is sent by the Client Application 132 to determine whether the Sandbox Manager 134 is in a state to service commands (e.g., available and functioning) and capable of responding to requests. If the Sandbox Manager 134 is running and in a state to service commands, the Sandbox Manager 134 will send a response to the Client Application 132.
In decision block 415, the Client Application 132 determines whether it has received a response from the Sandbox Manager 134 to the request sent in block 410. The decision in the decision block 415 is “YES” when the Client Application 132 has received a response from the Sandbox Manager 134 indicating that the Sandbox Manager 134 is in a state to service commands and is capable of responding to requests. The decision in the decision block 415 is “NO” when the Client Application 132 has not received a response from the Sandbox Manager 134 or receives a response indicating the Sandbox Manager 134 is not in a state to service commands (e.g., available and functioning) or is incapable of responding to requests.
When the decision in the decision block 415 is “NO,” the Client Application 132 returns to block 410. Alternatively, when the decision in the decision block 415 is “NO,” the method 400 may terminate. Optionally, the Client Application 132 may display a message to the user indicating the virtualized application file 140 is not available to download.
When the decision in the decision block 415 is “YES,” in block 420, the Client Application 132 establishes a new communication session with the Sandbox Manager 134 and sends a request including a “start” command to the Sandbox Manager 134. As mentioned above, when the communications server 300 (see
In block 425, when the Sandbox Manager 134 receives the “start” command, the Client Request Manager 310 identifies a Client Request object type for the virtualized application file 140, creates a Client Request object of the type identified, and associates the session identifier with the new Client Request object. Then, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether at least a portion of the virtualized application file 140 is stored in the cache 139 (see
When the decision in decision block 425 is “YES,” in decision block 430, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether the virtualized application file 140 is stored in its entirety in the cache 139 (see
When the decision in decision block 430 is “YES,” the virtualized application file 140 need not be transferred to the client computing device 9 because the virtualized application file is already stored in the cache 139 (see
When the decision in decision block 425 or decision block 430 is “NO,” the Sandbox Manager 134 begins transferring the virtualized application file. If the decision block 425 was “NO,” in block 445, the Sandbox Manager 134 adds the virtualized application file 140 to the cache 139 (see
If the decision block 425 was “YES” but the decision block 430 was “NO,” in block 450, the Sandbox Manager 134 sets the status field of the Client Request object to “In Progress,” calculates the progress value, and sets the progress field to the calculated progress value. Then, the Sandbox Manager 134 begins transferring the virtualized application file from wherever the previous transfer activities left off. The transfer may be started in a new thread using http protocol. In block 455, the progress field of the Client Request object is updated occasionally (e.g., periodically) to indicate the percentage of the virtualized application file 140 transferred. Then, the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to block 440.
In block 440, the Sandbox Manager 134 returns the session identifier associated with the virtualized application file 140 to the Client Application 132.
In block 460, the Client Application 132 sends a request to the Sandbox Manager 134 including the “status” command. In response to the “status” command, in block 465, the Sandbox Manager 134 sends the status value (e.g., “in progress” or “complete”) of the status field of the Client Request object to the Client Application 132. In block 467, the Client Application 132 receives the status value sent by the Sandbox Manager 134. Optionally, the Client Application 132 may display the status value of the transfer to the user.
In decision block 470, the Client Application 132 determines whether the entire virtualized application file has been downloaded. The decision in decision block 470 is “YES,” if the status field of the Client Request object indicates the entire virtualized application file has been downloaded (e.g., the status field has the value “Complete”). The decision in decision block 470 is “NO,” if the status field of the Client Request object indicates the virtualized application file 140 has not been completely downloaded (e.g., status field has the value “In Progress”).
If the decision in decision block 470 is “NO,” in block 475, the Client Application 132 sends a request to the Sandbox Manager 134 including the “progress” command to determine the progress value of the transfer of the virtualized application file 140. In response to the “progress” command, in block 480, the Sandbox Manager 134 sends the progress value in the progress field of the Client Request object (e.g., “10%,” “25%,” etc.) to the Client Application 132. In block 482, the Client Application 132 receives the progress value sent by the Sandbox Manager 134. Optionally, the Client Application 132 may display the progress value to the user. Then, the Client Application 132 returns to block 460.
If the decision in decision block 470 is “YES,” in block 485, the Client Application 132 sends a request to the Sandbox Manager 134 including an “exec” command. In response to the “exec” command, in block 490, the Executer 320 (see
As mentioned above, the parameters of the “exec” command includes the session identifier (identifying the virtualized application file transferred) and optional command-line arguments. The session identifier is used to identify the Client Request Object storing the path to the transferred virtualized application file stored on the cache 139 (see
The path is then used to execute the transferred virtualized application file. The transferred virtualized application file may be executed via an operating system programming interface function call (e.g., ShellExecute, CreateProcess, and the like).
In block 490, if the virtualized application file 140 is configured to be executed inside a virtualized environment provided a virtual machine executable file (e.g., the virtualized application file 140 is not an executable file having the “.exe” extension), the Sandbox Manager 134 executes the virtual machine executable file and instructs the executing virtual machine to execute the virtualized application file 140. The Sandbox Manager 134 may send a command to the operating system 35A to execute the virtual machine inside an operating system shell process. The command may include the path to the virtualized application file 140 as a parameter that the virtual machine uses to locate and execute the virtualized application file 140.
If more than one virtual machine executable file (e.g., virtual machine executable files 137) are stored in the system memory 22A, the Sandbox Manager 134 identifies which of the virtual machine executable files 137 is configured to execute the virtualized application file 140. As explained above, the virtualized application file 140 may include a version identifier that may be used by the Sandbox Manager 134 to select which of the virtual machine executable files 137 is configured to execute the virtualized application file 140. Each of the virtual machine executable files 137 may also include a version identifier that may be matched to the version identifier of a particular virtualized application file to determine whether the virtual machine executable file is configured to execute the particular virtualized application file.
By way of a non-limiting example, blocks 425, 430, 435, 445, 450, and 455 of the method 400 may be implemented in accordance with the following block of pseudo code.
By way of a non-limiting example, the function named “StartDownload” used in the above block of pseudo code may be implemented as follows:
By way of a non-limiting example, the function named “FindFullSize” used in the first block of pseudo code may be implemented as follows:
Referring to
Referring to
In block 510, the Client Application 132 receives information from the server computing device 7 (see
As discussed above, in embodiments in which the client computing device 9 (see
In decision block 515, for each virtualized application file available for execution, the Client Application 132 determines whether the pre-fetch indicator associated with the virtualized application file indicates the pre-fetch operation should be performed with respect to the virtualized application file. As explained above, in particular embodiments, the plug-in 136 communicates with the Sandbox Manager 134. Thus, in some embodiments, after the webpage loads, the plug-in 136 determines whether the pre-fetch operation has been enabled for the virtualized application file(s) available for execution on the webpage.
As explained above, the plug-in 136 is configured to request a different session for each virtualized application file being transferred and/or executed. This includes a different session for each virtualized application file being transferred by a pre-fetch operation. Thus, each virtualized application file being transferred and/or executed may be identified by the Client Application 132 and the Sandbox Manager 134 using the unique session identifier. However, for ease of illustration, sending a request for the creation of a session by the Sandbox Manager 134, and receiving of the session identifier from the Sandbox Manager 134 have been omitted from
For each virtualized application file for which the pre-fetch indicator indicates the pre-fetch operation should be performed, the decision in decision block 515 is “YES,” and the Client Application 132 sends a request including the “start” command and two parameters to the Sandbox Manager 134 in block 520. The first parameter is the application identifier (e.g., the session identifier) associated with the virtualized application file to be transferred and the second parameter is the priority value for the transfer. In block 520, the priority value indicates the transfer has a low priority.
In block 520, while the virtualized application file is downloading, the Client Application 132 may send requests including “Status” and “Progress” commands as described above with respect to blocks 460 and 475, respectively, of the method 400 (illustrated in
Then, in block 525, the Client Application 132 waits for a user command to download and/or execute a particular virtualized application file (e.g., the virtualized application file 140). By way of an example, the user command may be received in any manner described above with respect to block 405 of the method 400 (see
For each virtualized application file for which the pre-fetch indicator indicates the pre-fetch operation is not to be performed, the decision in decision block 515 is “NO.” When the decision in decision block 515 is “NO,” the Client Application 132 does not send a request to the Sandbox Manager 134 and instead waits for a user command in block 525. Pre-fetching may be disabled for many reasons. For example, there may be too many virtualized application files available for download and/or execution. Alternatively, pre-fetching may be disabled when a particular virtualized application file is too large and/or too infrequently downloaded and/or executed.
In decision block 530, the Client Application 132 determines whether it has received a user command to download and/or execute a particular virtualized application file (e.g., the virtualized application file 140). The decision in decision block 530 is “YES” when the Client Application 132 has received a user command. The decision in decision block 530 is “NO” if the Client Application 132 does not receive a user command.
When the decision in decision block 530 is “YES,” in block 535, the Client Application 132 sends a request including the “start” command and two parameters to the Sandbox Manager 134. The first parameter is the application identifier (e.g., the session identifier) associated with the virtualized application file to be transferred. The second parameter is the priority value for the transfer. In block 535, the priority value indicates the transfer has a high priority.
In block 535, while the virtualized application file is downloading, the Client Application 132 may send requests including “Status” and “Progress” commands as described above with respect to blocks 460 and 475, respectively, of the method 400 (illustrated in
Then, optionally, after the virtualized application file is fully downloaded, the Client Application 132 may send a request including the “exec” command to the Sandbox Manager 134. Then, the Client Application 132 advances to decision block 540.
When the decision in decision block 530 is “NO,” the Client Application 132 advances to decision block 540.
In decision block 540, the Client Application 132 determines whether it has disconnected from the server computing device 7 (see
When the decision in decision block 540 is “YES,” the method 500 terminates. Alternatively, in embodiments in which the Client Application 132 is a web browser and has navigated to a different webpage provided by the server computing device 7, the web server components 142 may provide a different webpage to the Client Application 132 identifying one or more virtualized application files for download. When this occurs, the Client Application 132 returns to block 510 to receive information related to those virtualized application files.
When the decision in decision block 540 is “NO,” the Client Application 132 returns to block 525 to wait for a user command.
As explained above, the Client Application 132 is configured to send a request to the Sandbox Manager 134 requesting a different session for each virtualized application file being transferred and/or executed. This includes a different session for each virtualized application file being transferred by a pre-fetch operation. Thus, each virtualized application file being transferred and/or executed may be identified by the Client Application 132 and the Sandbox Manager 134 using the unique session identifier. However, for ease of illustration, receiving a request for the creation of a session from the Client Application 132, creating the session, and sending the session identifier to the Client Application 132 have been omitted from
In first block 605, the Sandbox Manager 134 receives a request from the Client Application 132 including the “start” command, the application identifier (e.g., the session identifier), and the priority value. As explained above, a Client Request object is created for each virtualized application file to be downloaded and/or executed. For example, when the Sandbox Manager 134 receives a “start” command for the first time to start downloading the virtualized application file 140, a new Client Request object may be created for the virtualized application file 140. As explained above, the Client Request object associated with the virtualized application file is responsible for managing transfer and execution of the virtualized application file, including determining status, managing the cache 139 (see
In decision block 610, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether the priority value in the request indicates the transfer has a high priority (i.e., the request is for a high priority transfer). The decision in decision block 610 is “YES” when the request is for a high priority transfer. On the other hand, the decision in decision block 610 is “NO” when the priority value in the request indicates the transfer has a low priority (i.e., the request is for a low priority transfer).
When the decision in decision block 610 is “NO,” in block 615, the request is added to a pre-fetch stack (or similar data structure). Then, in decision block 620, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether a high priority request is presently being processed. The decision in decision block 620 is “YES” when a high priority request is presently being processed. On the other hand, the decision in decision block 620 is “NO” when a high priority request is not presently being processed.
When the decision in decision block 620 is “YES,” in block 625, the Sandbox Manager 134 waits to process low priority requests (e.g., low priority requests in the pre-fetch stack) until after the high priority request has finished processing. Then, the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to block 630.
When the decision in decision block 620 is “NO,” the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to block 630. In block 630, the Sandbox Manager 134 selects a low priority request for processing. In embodiments in which the requests are stored in a pre-fetch stack, in block 630, the last low priority request added to the pre-fetch stack may be “popped” from the pre-fetch stack.
Then, in block 635, the Sandbox Manager 134 processes the low priority request selected in block 630. In block 635, if no portion of the virtualized application file identified by the application identifier has been downloaded, the Downloader 315 (see
In embodiments configured to download only a portion of the virtualized application file, after the portion has been downloaded, the Downloader 315 (see
If the low priority request is a request to download and/or execute a virtualized application file that has already been at least partially downloaded, any portion of the virtualized application file that was not downloaded by the pre-fetch operation may be downloaded by the Downloader 315 (see
If the high priority request is a request to download and/or execute a virtualized application file that has already been downloaded by the Downloader 315 (see
However, as mentioned above with respect to the method 500 illustrated in
While downloading the virtualized application file, the Client Application 132 may send requests including “Status” and “Progress” commands as described above with respect to blocks 460 and 475, respectively, of the method 400 (illustrated in
Next, in decision block 640, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether there are any remaining low priority requests to process. In embodiments in which the low priority requests are stored in a pre-fetch stack, in decision block 640, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether there are any low priority requests stored in the pre-fetch stack. The decision in decision block 640 is “YES” when the Sandbox Manager 134 determines there are no low priority requests left to be processed (e.g., the pre-fetch stack is empty). On the other hand, the decision in decision block 640 is “NO” when the Sandbox Manager 134 determines there are low priority requests left to be processed (e.g., the pre-fetch stack is not empty).
When the decision in decision block 640 is “YES,” the method 600 terminates. When the decision in decision block 640 is “NO,” the Sandbox Manager 134 returns to decision block 620.
When the decision in decision block 610 is “YES,” in decision block 650, the Sandbox Manager 134 determines whether it is currently pre-fetching one or more virtualized application files. The decision in decision block 650 is “YES” when the Sandbox Manager 134 is currently pre-fetching one or more virtualized application files. Otherwise, the decision in decision block 650 is “NO.”
When the decision in decision block 650 is “NO,” in block 655, the Sandbox Manager 134 processes the high priority request. In block 655, if no portion of the virtualized application file identified by the application identifier has been downloaded, the Downloader 315 (see
If the high priority request is a request to download and/or execute a virtualized application file that has already been at least partially pre-fetched, any portion of the virtualized application file that was not downloaded by the pre-fetch operation may be downloaded by the Downloader 315 (see
If the high priority request is a request to download and/or execute a virtualized application file that has already been fully downloaded by the Downloader 315 (see
In block 655, the Executer 320 (see
Returning to
If the high priority request is a request to download and/or execute a virtualized application file that has already been at least partially pre-fetched, the priority value for the low priority request may be updated in block 665 to high priority. Then, any portion of the virtualized application file not downloaded by the pre-fetch operation may be downloaded by the Downloader 315 (see
If the high priority request is a request to download and/or execute a virtualized application file that has already been fully downloaded by the Downloader 315 (see
In block 665, the Executer 320 (see
After the high priority request has been processed, in block 670, the Sandbox Manager 134 resumes any pre-fetching operations paused in block 660. Then, the Sandbox Manager 134 advances to decision block 640.
While in the description of method 600 provided above the pre-fetch stack has been described as storing requests, in alternative embodiments, the pre-fetch stack may store Client Request objects instead. Further, while the requests have been described as being stored in a stack, other data structures such as a queue, array, linked list, and the like may be used to store the requests or Client Request objects.
When performing the method 600, the Sandbox Manager 134 treats low priority requests (which are automatically initiated the Client Application 132) differently than high priority requests (which are initiated by a user command provided to the Client Application 132). If no high priority requests are being processed by the Sandbox Manager 134, low priority requests are processed. However, if during the processing of low priority requests, a high priority request is received by the Sandbox Manager 134, processing of the low priority requests is paused.
However, during the processing of high and low priority requests, the user may decide to execute a virtual application on the webpage. As explained above, to do so, the user enters a user command (e.g., clicks on a hyperlink, presses a button, etc.) into the Client Application 132. In response, the Client Application 132 sends a request including the “start” command, the application identifier, and the priority value to the Sandbox Manager 134. Under these circumstances, the priority value will have the high priority value. As explained above, when the Sandbox Manager 134 receives the high priority request, the Sandbox Manager 134 will pause any pre-fetching operations the Sandbox Manager 134 was performing when it received the high priority request.
The following pseudo code provides an exemplary implementation of portions of the method 600.
The pseudo code above includes a function named “HandleRequest” that receives a request sent by the Client Application 132 and extracts the command. If the command is a “start” command, the “HandleRequest” function extracts the application identifier (“sSource”) and the priority value (“iPriority”) from the parameters. Then, the “HandleRequest” function calls a function named “StartTransfer” configured to receive the application identifier (“sSource”) and the priority value (“iPriority”).
The “StartTransfer” function configured to receive the application identifier (“sSource”) and the priority value (“iPriority”) pushes the request to the pre-fetch stack if the priority value has a low value. If instead the priority value of the request has a high value, the “StartTransfer” function calls a function named “StartTransfer” configured to receive the application identifier (“sSource”) and a download amount (“IMaxTransfer”). The download amount is specified as being the entire virtualized application file (e.g., the constant “FULL_DOWNLOAD” indicates the entire virtualized application file is be downloaded).
Then, the “StartTransfer” function configured to receive the application identifier (“sSource”) and the priority value (“iPriority”) calls a function named “PrioritizeTransfers.”
The “PrioritizeTransfers” function determines the highest priority value of the requests including the “start” command received by the Sandbox Manager 134. If the highest priority value is the high value, the “PrioritizeTransfers” function calls a function named “PauseLowPriorityTransfers” that pauses download operations being performed in response to low priority requests (i.e., requests including the “start” command and having low value priority values). Thus, the “PrioritizeTransfers” function pauses any pre-fetch operations being performed. If on the other hand, the highest priority value is the low value, the “PrioritizeTransfers” function calls a function named “StartLowPriorityTransfers” that starts download operations with respect to low priority requests. Thus, the “PrioritizeTransfers” function initiates pre-fetch operations.
The “StartLowPriorityTransfers” function pops a low priority request from pre-fetch stack. Then, the “StartLowPriorityTransfers” function calls the “StartTransfer” function configured to receive the application identifier (“sSource”) and the download amount (“IMaxTransfer”). The “StartLowPriorityTransfers” function passes the popped low priority request as the application identifier and specifies the download amount (e.g., the product of 10*1024*1024).
The “StartTransfer” function configured to receive the application identifier (“sSource”) and the download amount (“IMaxTransfer”) downloads the portion of the virtualized application file associated with the application identifier from the server computing device 7 and stores the downloaded portion in the cache 139 (see
The methods 500 and 600 may be used with limited bandwidth connections (like those that are commonly used from user's homes or businesses to help reduce the amount of time required to download and/or execute a virtual application, such as the virtual application 110).
Together, the methods 500 and 600 preemptively transfer at least a portion of a particular virtualized application file to reduce an amount of time required to transfer the particular virtualized application file after the user has entered a user command into the Client Application 132 requesting the download and/or execution of the particular virtualized application file. Thus, the methods 500 and 600 gives the user the impression that the download has taken less time.
Because users typically spend at least some time reviewing a web page before selecting a virtual application to execute (e.g., by clicking on a hyperlink), the methods 500 and 600 may be used to pre-fetch one or more virtualized application files while the user reviews the web page and is not otherwise downloading data over the network 10 (see
For example, a user typically spends 30 seconds or more reading information provided on the web page before selecting a virtual application to execute. During this time (e.g., 30 seconds or more), the Sandbox Manager 134 may be transferring the virtualized application file of the virtual application. Therefore, by the time the user instructs the Client Application 132 to execute the virtual application, the virtualized application file may already be fully downloaded.
Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that implementations may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Implementations may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
The exemplary hardware and operating environment of
The computing device 12 includes the system memory 22. Each of the system memory 22A (see
The computing device 12 also includes a processing unit 21, and a system bus 23 that operatively couples various system components, including the system memory 22, to the processing unit 21. There may be only one or there may be more than one processing unit 21, such that the processor of computing device 12 comprises a single central-processing unit (CPU), or a plurality of processing units, commonly referred to as a parallel processing environment. The computing device 12 may be a conventional computer, a distributed computer, or any other type of computer.
The system bus 23 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The system memory may also be referred to as simply the memory, and includes read only memory (ROM) 24 and random access memory (RAM) 25. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 26, containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computing device 12, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 24. The computing device 12 further includes a hard disk drive 27 for reading from and writing to a hard disk, not shown, a magnetic disk drive 28 for reading from or writing to a removable magnetic disk 29, and an optical disk drive 30 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 31 such as a CD ROM, DVD, or other optical media.
The hard disk drive 27, magnetic disk drive 28, and optical disk drive 30 are connected to the system bus 23 by a hard disk drive interface 32, a magnetic disk drive interface 33, and an optical disk drive interface 34, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computing device 12. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any type of computer-readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, USB drives, digital video disks, Bernoulli cartridges, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like, may be used in the exemplary operating environment. As is apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, the hard disk drive 27 and other forms of computer-readable media (e.g., the removable magnetic disk 29, the removable optical disk 31, flash memory cards, USB drives, and the like) accessible by the processing unit 21 may be considered components of the system memory 22.
A number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk drive 27, magnetic disk 29, optical disk 31, ROM 24, or RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 36, other program modules 37, and program data 38. A user may enter commands and information into the computing device 12 through input devices such as a keyboard 40 and pointing device 42. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 that is coupled to the system bus 23, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, game port, or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 23 via an interface, such as a video adapter 48. In addition to the monitor, computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers.
The computing device 12 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as remote computer 49. These logical connections are achieved by a communication device coupled to or a part of the computing device 12 (as the local computer). Implementations are not limited to a particular type of communications device. The remote computer 49 may be another computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a client, a memory storage device, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computing device 12. The remote computer 49 may be connected to a memory storage device 50. The logical connections depicted in
When used in a LAN-networking environment, the computing device 12 is connected to the local area network 51 through a network interface or adapter 53, which is one type of communications device. When used in a WAN-networking environment, the computing device 12 typically includes a modem 54, a type of communications device, or any other type of communications device for establishing communications over the wide area network 52, such as the Internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computing device 12, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote computer 49 and/or the remote memory storage device 50. It is appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of and communications devices for establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
The computing device 12 and related components have been presented herein by way of particular example and also by abstraction in order to facilitate a high-level view of the concepts disclosed. The actual technical design and implementation may vary based on particular implementation while maintaining the overall nature of the concepts disclosed.
Returning to
Returning to
Returning to
The foregoing described embodiments depict different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures can be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected,” or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that, based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention and its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scope of this invention. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the invention is solely defined by the appended claims. It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to inventions containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations).
Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/705,492, filed on Feb. 12, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/695,107, filed on Jan. 27, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4468732 | Raver | Aug 1984 | A |
5437031 | Kitami | Jul 1995 | A |
5495610 | Shing et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5774713 | Yokota | Jun 1998 | A |
5860068 | Cook | Jan 1999 | A |
5987590 | Wing So | Nov 1999 | A |
6023712 | Spear et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6192375 | Gross | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6263363 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345212 | Nourse | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366947 | Kavner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6453334 | Vinson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6493733 | Pollack et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6564229 | Baweja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6675216 | Quatrano et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6704808 | Kasamatsu et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6757893 | Haikin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7028295 | Li et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7064760 | Capin et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065504 | Sakuma et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076768 | Li et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089259 | Kouznetsov et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096253 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096416 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117495 | Blaser et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130073 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7162036 | Rowe | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7240162 | De Vries | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246351 | Bloch et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272613 | Sim et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7337298 | Kawachiya et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356679 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7360097 | Rothstein | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7386542 | Maybury et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386546 | Santry et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7437371 | Rathakrishnan et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451176 | Anders et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451196 | de Vries et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7499991 | Johnson | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519959 | Dmitriev | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7523116 | Yan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529784 | Kavuri et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536541 | Isaacson | May 2009 | B2 |
7577751 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584342 | Nordquist et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7590644 | Matsakis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600097 | Wright | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7607127 | Romm et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623673 | Mercier | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634477 | Hinshaw | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634772 | Parthasarathy et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7664367 | Suzuki | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669189 | Umamageswaran | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7689825 | Iwamura | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7707564 | Marvin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7743407 | Sprigg et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752442 | Della-Libera et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7752511 | Fulton et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761503 | Dhawan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7797748 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801827 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831047 | Rowe | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836299 | England et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840961 | Weathersby | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7950026 | Urbach | May 2011 | B1 |
7958497 | Lindo et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7970789 | Blaser et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7971032 | Shattuck | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8010667 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8065675 | Strauss et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069443 | Ackerman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073926 | Traut et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8180884 | Hall | May 2012 | B1 |
8219805 | Ie et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8230442 | Aho et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8271944 | Austin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8347208 | Howell | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8356266 | Ou et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8375140 | Tippin et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8387006 | Taylor | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8429248 | Ketrenos et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8434093 | Larimore et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8453049 | Grieve | May 2013 | B1 |
8468175 | Obata | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489513 | Bishop et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8510734 | Criddle et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8626806 | Larimore et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8645488 | Ivory et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677345 | Choi et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8719898 | Barton et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8745601 | Carlson et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8762495 | Obata et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762951 | Kosche et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8763009 | Degirmenci et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8769051 | Obata | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8776038 | Larimore et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8782106 | Obata | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8806325 | Decker | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8914427 | Larimore et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8954958 | Murphey et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8978012 | Poole | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8990289 | Mott | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003541 | Patidar | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9021015 | Murphey et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9098706 | Kennedy | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9104517 | Obata et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9106425 | Murphey et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9158845 | Reddy | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9207934 | Larimore et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9208004 | Degirmenci et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9208169 | Obata | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9209976 | Murphey et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9218359 | Larimore et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9229748 | Larimore et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9251167 | Obata | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9268542 | Mars et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
20010016905 | Kasamatsu et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020029283 | Beckett et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032754 | Logston et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020066085 | Nowlin, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020099951 | O'Connor | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112078 | Yach | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129129 | Bloch et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133491 | Sim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138441 | Lopatic | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161578 | Saindon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162015 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174193 | Mikhalchuk | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005118 | Williams | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031176 | Sim et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051169 | Sprigg et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040003390 | Canter | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040044645 | Palumbo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083474 | McKinlay et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111671 | Lu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128342 | Maes et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133444 | Defaix et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139315 | Tokutani et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040237082 | Alcazar | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255293 | Spotswood | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010932 | Kohno et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050132359 | McGuire et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050198628 | Graham et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198647 | Hipp et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235282 | Anderson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262553 | Bialick et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273772 | Matsakis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283673 | Ode | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289546 | Shpeisman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060048136 | Vries et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074733 | Shukla et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075064 | Keohane et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085359 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060117325 | Wieland et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123185 | de Vries et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168294 | de Vries et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060218165 | Vries et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222203 | Mercier | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230175 | de Vries et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242626 | Pham et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248442 | Rosenstein et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253535 | Betros et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256130 | Gonzalez | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259585 | Keohane et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070011672 | Bhide et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016721 | Gay | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043943 | Peretti | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070074191 | Geisinger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078988 | Miloushev et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083482 | Rathi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070143672 | Lipton | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143704 | Laird-McConnell | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168953 | Diez et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168965 | Zenz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174824 | Relyea et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192329 | Croft et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226798 | Sibert | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234277 | Lei et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240155 | Shlomai | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245331 | Daynes et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070277102 | Kanzaki | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283324 | Geisinger | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294373 | Harrison | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294674 | Marilly et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010389 | Iwata | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016397 | Pagan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034268 | Dodd et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080092057 | Monson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080154985 | Childs et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155171 | Jeong | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163194 | Dias et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181230 | Hitt et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184135 | Washburn et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184211 | Nickolls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201705 | Wookey | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215722 | Hogaboom et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235680 | Strauss | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080275938 | Yach | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281882 | Hachio et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294877 | Haga et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298219 | Yamagata et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301672 | Rao et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037287 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055542 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064086 | Faus et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076898 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076966 | Bishop et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077551 | Whiteley | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077645 | Kottahachchi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090110307 | Markowitz | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125907 | Wen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132811 | Koster et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133013 | Criddle et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158432 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164570 | Paila | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172664 | Mostafa | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193057 | Maes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198358 | Logan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090199175 | Keller et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216811 | Manczak et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235158 | Rosenstein et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240663 | Plattner et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248695 | Ozzie | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249071 | De Atley et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249324 | Brar et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300076 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300151 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307351 | Raja et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307763 | Rawlins et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313322 | Sheehan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328030 | Fries | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005291 | Hulten et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023640 | Vinson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023726 | Aviles | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023934 | Sheehan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023974 | Shiragaki et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100037206 | Larimore et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037216 | Carcerano et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037235 | Larimore et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100064295 | Aho et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077096 | Philip et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082926 | Sahita et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088448 | Min et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106804 | He et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107163 | Lee | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121973 | Lobacheva et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131084 | Van Camp | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132009 | Khemani et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138479 | Zhu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146590 | Jung | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169790 | Vaughan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205604 | Brower et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223598 | Levine et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235831 | Dittmer | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241718 | Rasmussen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250782 | Pratt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281458 | Paladino et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306849 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318997 | Li et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322523 | Mitsuhashi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333085 | Criddle et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004840 | Feinberg et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022947 | Rajkumar | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029641 | Fainberg | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110078625 | Mumford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106908 | Risku et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145428 | Wei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145592 | Greiner | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145726 | Wei et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153437 | Archer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153975 | Accapadi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154213 | Wheatley | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173251 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173607 | Murphey et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179411 | Lederer | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185013 | Obata et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185043 | Zeller et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191772 | Larimore et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225584 | Andrade et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225592 | Goldin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246659 | Bouazizi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265078 | Beatty et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110289513 | Degirmenci et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302274 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005237 | Obata | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005244 | Obata et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005246 | Obata | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005309 | Obata et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005310 | Obata | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005334 | Raja et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005674 | Larimore et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120054744 | Singh et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120096071 | Murphey et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110337 | Murphey et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125993 | Thiele et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150986 | Piccinini et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155358 | Hao et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120203807 | Larimore et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203808 | Larimore et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130086386 | Murphey et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104208 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104219 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117567 | Chang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132525 | Tippin | May 2013 | A1 |
20130139250 | Lo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130191882 | Jolfaei | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130247070 | Larimore et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254848 | Ge | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271456 | Haswell et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275886 | Haswell et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283362 | Kress et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140298401 | Batson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance, 17 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/879,956, dated Feb. 21, 2013. |
Final Office Action, 11 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/879,956 , dated Nov. 23, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, 19 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,904, dated Nov. 13, 2012. |
Final Rejection, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,904, dated Jul. 31, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/906,904, dated Oct. 8, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, 24 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,348, dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
Final Office Action, 26 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,348, dated Jul. 11, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,348, dated Nov. 13, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,348, dated Sep. 4, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,348 , dated Mar. 23, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, 24 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,265, dated Dec. 12, 2012. |
Final Office Action, 33 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,265, dated Jul. 25, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/088,265, dated Feb. 14, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, 15 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,258, dated Jul. 13, 2012. |
Final Office Action, 33 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,258, dated Jan. 11, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,258, dated Apr. 29, 2014. |
Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,258, dated Jan. 23, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,258, dated Apr. 8, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, 10 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,049, dated Dec. 13, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 9 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,049, dated Apr. 29, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, 15 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,049, dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, 9 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,140, dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
Final Office Action, 13 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,140, dated Jul. 22, 2013. |
Non-Final Rejection, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,140, dated Nov. 15, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,140, dated Aug. 11, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,140, dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,969, dated Feb. 28, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,969, dated Nov. 14, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,969, dated Feb. 4, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,969 , dated Apr. 2, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,682, dated Jun. 25, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,682, dated Oct. 28, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,682, dated Feb. 17, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,682, dated Jun. 5, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,067, dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,067, dated Nov. 17, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,067, dated Mar. 2, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,067, dated Jun. 15, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/245,707, dated Feb. 12, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/262,511, dated Apr. 27, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,468, dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,468, dated Oct. 16, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,506, dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,382, dated Feb. 10, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,033, dated Jul. 14, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,813, dated Feb. 12, 2016, 2014. |
Thapin, John, “Hive: Operating System Fault Containment for Shared-Memory Multiprocessors,” Technical Report No. CSL-TR-97-712, Computer Systems laboratory, Departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stanford University, 156 pages, Jul. 1997. |
Hung, Eugene, “Using Behavior Templates to Design Remotely Executing Agents For Wireless Clients,” 2004 4th Norkshop on Applications and Services in Wireless Networks (ASWN), (2004). |
Susitaival, et al., “Analyizing the File Availability and Download Time in a P2P File Sharing System,” IEEE, 2007, pp. 88-95. |
Thinstall, “Application Virtualization: A Technical Overview of the Thinstall Application Virtualization Platform,” Nov. 2006. |
VMware, “Introduction to VMware ThinApp” (Published Jun. 27, 2008) retrieved from http://www.vmware.com/pdf/thinapp—intro.pdf on Sep. 27, 2015. |
Zheng et al., “SODON: A High Availability Multi-Source Content Distribution Overlay,” IEEE, 2004, pp. 87-92. |
Information Disclosure Statement Transmittal filed herewith. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,258, filed Jun. 28, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/245,707, filed Apr. 4, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/297,468, filed Jun. 5, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,382, filed Aug. 5, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,033, filed Jan. 28, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/608,444, filed Jan. 29, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,895, filed Jan. 30, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/731,344, filed Jun. 4, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,813, filed Jul. 1, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,858, filed Jul. 1, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/857,684, filed Sep. 17, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,790, filed Oct. 7, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,793, filed Oct. 7, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/960,163, filed Dec. 4, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,703, filed Mar. 25, 2016. |
Non-Final Office Action, 20 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,155, dated Dec. 19, 2011. |
Final Office Action, 22 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,155, dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, 22 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,155, dated Feb. 28, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, 11 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,155, dated Jun. 25, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,155, dated Oct. 25, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,155, dated Feb. 13, 2014. |
Restriction Requirement, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,161, dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action, 14 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,161, dated May 10, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 13 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,161, dated Oct. 10, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 12 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,161, dated Dec. 4, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 13 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/188,161, dated Jan. 4, 2013. |
Non-Final Office Action, 8 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,576, dated Nov. 2, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, 8 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,576, dated Jun. 20, 2013. |
Final Office Action, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,576, dated Jan. 30, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,576, dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, 17 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/695,107, dated Dec. 8, 2011. |
Final Office Action, 16 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/695,107, dated Oct. 30, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/695,107, dated Sep. 17, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, 21 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,029, dated Aug. 17, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 26 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,029, dated May 24, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,029, dated Oct. 3, 2014. |
Restriction Requirement, 5 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,492, dated Mar. 15, 2013. |
Restriction Requirement, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,492, dated Aug. 6, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,492, dated Sep. 26, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,492, dated Oct. 31, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, 18 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,082, dated Oct. 22, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 26 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,082, dated May 10, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,082, dated Feb. 28, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,082, dated Sep. 26, 2014. |
Restriction Requirement, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,085, dated Jan. 27, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, 9 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,085, dated Mar. 8, 2012. |
Final Office Action, 12 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,085, dated Nov. 14, 2012. |
Non-Final Office Action, 13 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,085, dated Mar. 18, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,085, dated Nov. 14, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,085, dated Mar. 6, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance, 25 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,918, dated Mar. 19, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 31 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,918, dated Jun. 21, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 22 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,918, dated Aug. 16, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 24 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,918, dated Sep. 26, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance, 35 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,918, dated Apr. 26, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,918, dated Aug. 20, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,918, dated Dec. 13, 2013. |
Non Final Office Action, 22 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/879,947, dated Jul. 10, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/879,947, dated Jan. 27, 2014. |
Non-Final Office Action, 11 pages, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/879,956, dated Jun. 6, 2012. |
Chapin, John, “Hive: Operating System Fault Containment for Shared-Memory Multiprocessors,” Technical Report No. CSL-TR-97-712, Computer Systems laboratory, Departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Stanford University, 156 pages, Jul. 1997. |
Hung, Eugene, “Using Behavior Templates to Design Remotely Executing Agents for Wireless Clients,” 2004 4th Workshop on Applications and Services in Wireless Networks (ASWN), (2004). |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/695,107, dated Jan. 5, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/695,107, dated Mar. 19, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/697,029, dated Jan. 30, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,082, dated Feb. 20, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, received in U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,082, dated Jun. 17, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 23, 2006, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,793. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 28, 2016, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,890. |
Lodi, Giorgia, Middleware Services for Dynamic Clustering of Application Servers (University of Bologna, 2006), 99 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 12, 2016, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/452,382. |
Final Office Action, dated Sep. 15, 2016, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,813. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 21, 2016, received in U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,258. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Dec. 15, 2016, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,858. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 21, 2016, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/789,813. |
Final Office Action, dated May 8, 2017, received in U.S. Appl. No. 14/877,790. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150149525 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12705492 | Feb 2010 | US |
Child | 14608444 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12695107 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 12705492 | US |