This invention relates to the utilization of electromagnetic (EM) radiation for treating selected dermatologic problems, and more particularly to a system which utilizes temperature detection at a waveguide through which radiation is being applied to the patient's skin to perform various control functions and to a head usable in such system or elsewhere, which head includes efficient reflectors for back-scattered radiation and/or for otherwise enhancing irradiation of a target volume containing the dermatologic problem.
Lasers, lamps and other sources of electromagnetic radiation are being increasingly utilized to treat various dermatological conditions, and in particular for the removal of unwanted hair, spider veins, leg veins, other veins or blood vessels which are visible through the patient's skin, lesions, port-wine stains, tattoos and the like. One problem with such treatments is that the only way to get the radiation to a target volume in the dermis where treatment is desired is to transmit the radiation to such volume through the overlying epidermis. Further, since many of the treatments involve absorption of energy by melanin in the dermal volume being treated, for example in a hair follicle, and there is also melanin in the epidermis, particularly in the portion thereof at the dermal/epidermal (DE) junction, the EM radiation used for treatment is generally also absorbed to varying degrees in the epidermis. Further, the deeper in the dermis the treatment is desired and/or the larger the element being treated, the more energy must be used, this generally involving use of a more powerful laser or other radiation source with higher fluence and/or operating such source for longer time durations. However, as the energy applied through the epidermis increases, the potential for damage to the epidermis as a result of energy absorption therein also increases.
Therefore, one limitation on the energies which can be used for various dermatological treatments in the dermis, and in particular on the depths in the dermis at which treatment can be performed, and on the size of the elements which can be treated, is that the energy applied cannot be so high as to cause appreciable damage to the epidermis. Various ways around this problem have been proposed in the prior art, most of which involve some cooling of the epidermis prior to and/or during treatment to limit or prevent thermal damage thereto. Examples of such procedures include applying cryogenic or other cooling sprays to the skin, applying a cooling gel to the skin, applying radiation through a cold-pack in contact with the skin or through an applicator which is cooled by flowing water, flowing air, or the like. However, these prior art systems have not been wholly satisfactory. One reason for this is that, since most of the absorption is in the melanin located in the lower portions of the epidermis, it is desirable to have cooling through the entire epidermal layer, which is typically about 0.1 mm thick. However, it is not desirable that the cooling extend significantly below the DE junction into the dermal layer since cooling in the dermal layer can potentially inhibit the desired thermal damage to follicles, blood vessels or the like in this region. Further, there are significant variations in radiation absorption by a patients skin, not only among different individuals, people having darker skin absorbing more radiation and being more prone to epidermal damage than people with lighter skin, but even for different areas on the body of a single individual. Therefore, cooling which is not customized to the treatment area generally results in the cooling not being to the proper depth, a problem which can interfere with treatment and/or permit thermal damage to the epidermis.
It would therefore be desirable if the temperature at a selected depth in the skin, for example the DE junction, could be measured, and this temperature utilized to control skin temperature, for example through the epidermis, by some combination of controlling the laser energy applied to skin and/or controlling cooling applied to the skin. However, while infrared sensors have for example been utilized in the past to detect temperature at the surface of the skin, such detection does not provide an accurate indication of temperature even at the skin surface, these readings varying with such factors as skin layer thickness, skin roughness and skin color in addition to temperature. Infrared sensors also provide virtually no information as to skin temperature at a depth below the surface. Therefore, such detection has heretofore been used only for gross controls, for example to turn off the laser if an emergency temperature threshold is exceeded or the like, but not to fine tune energy application and/or cooling so as to maintain a desired temperature at a selected depth, for example at the DE junction, thereby facilitating a desired treatment without epidermal damage.
A need therefore exists for an improved technique which permits more accurate determinations of skin temperature at various depths, including at the DE junction, so as to permit more accurate and more automatic control of EM radiation treatments for various dermatological conditions. In particular, because of variations in skin pigmentation, differences in epidermal depth, and other dermatological differences among patients, laser dermatology procedures are now performed almost exclusively by physicians or other highly trained individuals, and such individuals must exercise great care to assure that epidermal damage does not occur, while still achieving the desired therapeutic effect. More accurate measurement of temperature at desired depths would make treatments by such skilled personnel easier to perform and would permit such procedures to be safely performed by less highly trained, and therefore less expensive, personnel. Such skin temperature measurements could also be utilized to determine skin type/pigmentation for the patient and/or for the part of a patient's body being treated and/or for other purposes.
Where cooling of the epidermis is achieved by placing a cooled applicator or other cooled body in contact with the patient's skin, the contact must be made with sufficient pressure to assure good thermal contact between the cooled body and the skin. However, differences in skin thickness and elasticity, differences in bone backing and other factors affect the pressure required to achieve good thermal contact for different patients and for different areas on the body for the same patient. This is another reason why highly trained and skilled individuals are required for performing the treatments and contributes to the high cost of the treatment. It would therefore be preferable if an automatic technique could be provided for detecting, and thus assuring, good thermal contact between a cooling element and the patient's skin. Such a technique or mechanism, by assuring good thermal contact with the skin before the radiation source is fired, could solve two critical safety problems for radiation dermatology. First, it assures adequate cooling of the epidermis before heating thereof through energy absorption; and second, it assures that the radiation will not be accidentally applied to the eyes or other unwanted place.
Related but opposite problems arise in performing certain skin resurfacing/wrinkle removal procedures where the objective is to heat and destroy only the most surface layer of the skin, for example the epidermis, with minimal damage to underlying layers. This requires tight control of factors such as laser energy, pulse duration and repetition rate. However, variations in patient's skin make such tight control difficult even for highly trained and skilled personnel. Similar problems also arise in other dermatological procedures involving lasers or other radiation sources.
Another related problem in using an EM radiation source for dermatological treatment is that the skin reflects back a significant portion of the radiation applied thereto. Since this reflected energy does not reach the treatment site, a higher energy radiation source is required to achieve the desired dermatological treatment than would be the case if a larger percentage of the applied radiation reached the treatment site. It has previously been suggested that one solution to this problem is to provide a retro-reflector which collects and returns such back-scattered radiation to the patient's skin. However, existing retro-reflector devices have not optimized the collection and return of such back-scattered radiation and improved techniques for the more efficient reutilization of back-scattered radiation is therefore desirable. One particular problem with prior art retroreflectors is that they reflect all back-scattered radiation at substantially the same angle the radiation was received; however, radiation at an angle more parallel than perpendicular to the skin surface generally does not reach the treatment area and therefore only heats the surface of the skin, contributing to thermal damage of the skin, without having any beneficial/therapeutic effect. A retroreflection technique which does not contribute to or increase this “parallel” radiation would therefore be desirable.
Two other factors can contribute to the efficiency of dermatologic treatments. The first factor is “spot size” or in other words the optical aperture of the applied radiation. Spot size is typically limited by the optics of the handpiece utilized and by the desired fluence as a function of the available energy source. However, a larger spot size permits treatment of large body areas such as back or legs to be accomplished much more quickly, something which enhances both patient satisfaction and practitioner profitability. A technique for facilitating larger spot sizes is thus desirable.
Secondly, anything which reduces the distance from the irradiation source to the target area reduces the amount of energy required to achieve a desired therapeutic effect and anything which permits more of the applied energy to reach the target area has a similar effect. Techniques which facilitate the achievements of these objectives are therefore also desirable.
In accordance with the above, this invention provides both a system for treating a selected dermatologic problem and a head for use in such system. The head, for preferred embodiments includes an optical waveguide or other light path for directing EM radiation of a wavelength appropriate for treating the selected patient dermatologic problem to a first end of the waveguide, the waveguide also having a skin-contacting second end which is opposite the first end; and a sensor at the second end of the waveguide, or otherwise closely adjacent a skin-contacting surface of the head, which senses the temperature thereat. For preferred embodiments, the head also includes a mechanism for removing heat from the waveguide. In order to achieve commercially useful sensitivity, it is preferable that the sensor be located no more than a few millimeters from the skin-contacting surface of the head, for example, the second end of the waveguide, the end contacting the patient's skin. Therefore, for preferred embodiments, the sensor is located within 5 mm of the second end of the waveguide, and for the most preferred embodiments the sensor is located within 1 mm of the second end.
Where a mechanism for removing heat is provided, such mechanism preferably includes a thermoelectric device having one side in thermal contact with the waveguide and an opposite side in thermal contact with a temperature sink. For a preferred embodiment of the invention, back-scattered radiation is substantially internally reflected within the optical waveguide, and there is a reflector within the waveguide for returning back-scattered radiation through the waveguide to the patient's skin. While the reflector may be at a variety of locations within the waveguide, for a preferred embodiment, it is located at the first end of the waveguide. The reflector may also be along sides of the waveguide and the coefficient of reflection for areas of the reflector, either at the first end, the side walls or both, may be selected such that back scattered radiation which, before entering the waveguide, at angles nearer perpendicular to the patient's skin are reflected more strongly than backscattered radiation which, before entering the waveguide, are at angles more nearly parallel to the skin surface. The second end of the waveguide in contact with the patient's skin may also have an aperture which is at least substantially as great as the aperture of radiation back-scattered from the patients skin or a “reflection aperture” substantially as great as the radiation back-scatter aperture may be achieved in other ways. For example, a reflector plate of size to provide the desired reflection aperture may surround the second end of the waveguide. More generally, the invention may include at least one waveguide passing through the head and terminating at a skin-contacting surface thereof, EM radiation being applied through the at least waveguide path to the patient's skin; and a reflection means for returning back-scattered radiation to the patients skin, which reflection means has a reflection aperture at least substantially as great as the radiation back-scatter aperture. Reflection means may include at least a portion of the skin-contacting surface of the head, which portion may be in the form of a reflection plate, and may also include at least one reflection surface for back-scattered radiation entering the waveguide, at least part of which surface may be in the waveguide.
The system may be for treating a selected dermatological problem in a selected volume of a patient's skin at a depth d which is below the DE junction. A source of EM radiation of a wavelength appropriate for treating the problem is provided along with an optical waveguide, a mechanism which cools the patient's skin, at least in the portion thereof in contact with the waveguide when the second end of the waveguide is in contact with the patient's skin, and a temperature sensor at the second end of the waveguide. The temperature at the sensor is indicative of the temperature at the patients DE junction. Finally, controls are provided which are operative in response to the sensor indicating that the DE junction has been cooled to at least a selected temperature for permitting radiation from the source to be passed through the waveguide to the patient's skin. The cooling mechanism preferably removes heat from the waveguide; when in contact with the patient's skin, the waveguide removing heat from and thus cooling the skin. The controls may also be operative in response to the sensor for maintaining the DE junction within a selected temperature range during application of radiation to the patient's skin. The controls may also detect a selected temperature/time profile at the sensor, the profile being indicative of contact of the waveguide with the patient's skin, and may prevent radiation from passing to the patient's skin unless the predetermined profile is detected. This assures that radiation is not applied to the patient's skin unless there is good thermal contact between the radiation-applying waveguide of the head and the patient's skin. For preferred embodiments, the controls operate the cooling mechanism to cool the waveguide to a desired temperature, the controls being responsive to the sensor for determining when the desired temperature has been reached.
The controls may also be operative in response to the sensor sensing a selected increasing temperature profile at the sensor when the waveguide is placed in contact with the patient's skin for permitting radiation from the source to be passed through the waveguide to the patient's skin. This control may be instead of the control based on detection that the DE junction has been cooled to a selected temperature, but is preferably in addition thereto.
The enhanced retro-reflector features discussed above may also be used in the head independent of the temperature measuring features previously discussed, but are preferably used in conjunction therewith. The invention may also include a head having at least one optical waveguide for receiving EM radiation and for directing it to a skin-contacting surface of the at least one waveguide and a standoff having a first and a second end, with the first end surrounding the at least one waveguide at its lower end and forming a substantially air-tight seal therewith. The second end of the standoff is adapted to be in contact with the patient's skin over the selected volume to form a chamber between the skin-contacting waveguide surface, the patients skin and walls of the standoff. A means is also provided for creating negative pressure in the chamber to draw the patient's skin therein and into contact with the skin-contact surface. The walls of the standoff are preferably reflective to return back-scattered radiation to the patient's skin. The means for creating negative pressure may include a hose mounted at one end to open into the chamber and connected at its other end to a source of negative pressure. Alternatively, the means for creating negative pressure may include the walls of the standoff being deformable when pressure is applied to the head/waveguide to permit the skin-contacting surface of the waveguide to contact the patient's skin, forcing most of the air from the chamber, with the walls of the standoff returning to their undeformed state when pressure is released, resulting in the creation of negative pressure in the chamber. For example, the walls of the standoff may be in the form of a bellows, suction cup or elastic ring.
Finally, rather than a single optical waveguide, the output surface of a first optical waveguide to which irradiation is initially applied may be mounted to a first surface of a second optical waveguide which also has a second skin-contacting surface opposite the first surface. Optical radiation received from the first waveguide is transmitted through the second waveguide to the skin-contacting surface thereof The second skin-contacting surface of the second waveguide has a larger area than the output surface of the first waveguide and the second waveguide is formed to provide a larger optical aperture than of the first waveguide. The ratio of the spacing between the first and second surfaces of the second waveguide and a selected surface dimension of the skin-contacting surface of the second waveguide, for example the length of a side of the second surface or a diameter thereof, is approximately 1.5 to 1. Means may be provided for reflecting radiation back-scattered from the patient's skin into the second waveguide back into the patient's skin. The means for reflecting may include forming at least a portion of the first surface and/or other surfaces of the second waveguide so as to reflect radiation impinging thereon, and such reflection from the second waveguide may also be made angle dependent.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
a is a graph illustrating a calculated relationship over time between the temperature at the waveguide at two Δd's where a sensor may be located and the temperature at three different depths in a patient's skin, including at the DE or basal junction.
b is a graph illustrating a measured relationship over time between the temperature at the waveguide sensor for a preferred Δd and the temperature at two different depths in a patient's skin, including at the DE or basal junction.
a and 5b are simplified side sectional views of two alternative heads or applicators for providing a reflection aperture matching the aperture of radiation back-scatter.
a and 6b are simplified side sectional views of a head or applicator which utilizes negative pressure to draw a fold of skin into a cavity before negative pressure is applied and after negative pressure is applied respectively.
a and 7b are simplified side sectional views of a head or applicator for another embodiment of the invention which utilizes negative pressure to draw a fold of skin into a cavity at an intermediate step in the creation of the negative pressure and after negative pressure has been created respectively.
a, 8b and 8c are simplified side sectional views of a head or applicator for still another embodiment which uses negative pressure to draw a fold of skin into a chamber shown before negative pressure is created, at an intermediate stage in the creation of negative pressure and after negative pressure has been created respectively.
Radiation from source 12 passes through head 16 and is emitted therefrom as a converging beam 28 which is applied to an area 30 in dermis 24 containing the element to be treated. Area 30 may, for example, contain a hair follicle which is to be destroyed in order to achieve removal of unwanted hair, may be tattoo pigment which is to be removed, may be a spider vein or other blood vessel which is to be coagulated and removed or may be some other dermatological condition which is to be treated by the radiation. As discussed earlier, treatment of a patient is complicated by the fact that there may be significant variations among patients, and in different areas of the body of the same patient, in the thickness of epidermal layer 22, in the pigmentation of this layer (and in particular in the quantity of melanin at DE junction 26), and in other characteristics of the skin. These variations make it difficult to achieve a desired therapeutic effect without potential damage to the area of the patient's epidermis overlying treatment area 30.
Thermoelectric cooling elements 48 are also provided in contact with waveguide 40. While two such elements are shown in
The sides of thermoelectric elements 48 opposite those in contact with waveguide 40 are in thermal contact with heat sink or radiator 50 having channels 52 formed therein through which a cooling fluid such as air or water flows, the cooling fluid entering the head through a fluid junction 54 and exiting through a fluid junction 56 (or entering though fluid junction 56 and exiting through fluid junction 54).
Optical radiation is applied to the head through an optical fiber, fiber bundle or other light pipe 58 which terminates at a chamber 60. Radiation exiting optical fiber 58 expands in chamber 60 before entering waveguide 40 for application to the patient's skin. Fiber 58 is mounted in a sleeve 62 of optically opaque material, the rear portion of which is mounted in a tube 64 and the forward portion of which extends through a holder assembly 66. Tube 64 is mounted in a chamber 68 formed in the rear of holder assembly 66 to permit assembly 69, which includes fiber 58, sleeve 62 and tube 64, to be moved forward and backward, moving fiber 58 in chamber 60 to adjust the optical aperture of the head. O-rings 70 and 72 seal chamber 60 to keep air and moisture out so as to avoid condensation on cooled optical surfaces 74 and 76. Nitrogen or another gas which does not condense at temperatures down to −40° C. is utilized to fill chamber 60.
Surface 74 of the waveguide is an optical reflecting surface as are all surfaces of chamber 60, including surface 76 at the rear thereof As will be discussed later, these surfaces retroreflect back-scattered light from the patient's skin. The side walls of both waveguide 40 and chamber 60 may also be fully reflective or may selectively reflect in a manner and for reasons to be discussed later.
In operation, assembly 69 is initially positioned to achieve a desired optical aperture for head 16. Thermoelectric elements 48 are also energized to cool waveguide 40 to a selected temperature, for example 10° C. to −40° C. The criteria is to bring the waveguide 40 to a sufficiently low temperature to achieve the desired cooling of epidermis 22 without resulting in tissue temperature being brought down to a level where water in the cells might freeze. Good results have been achieved with a waveguide temperature in the 0° C. to −30° C. range, with a preferred temperature of approximately −10° C.
When the above preliminary steps have been completed, head 16 may be brought into physical contact with an area of the patient's skin where treatment is to be performed. This contact may be under low pressure, preferably at least sufficient to establish good thermal contact between waveguide 40 and the patient's skin, where the objective is to coagulate blood in for example a spider vein, leg vein or other vein or blood vessel, or may be under pressure greater than the patient's blood pressure for hair removal or other applications where it is preferable to remove blood from the region of skin between waveguide 40 and area 30 under treatment.
In any event, head 16, and in particular waveguide 40 thereof, should be placed in contact with the patient's skin with sufficient pressure to assure good thermal contact between the patient's skin and waveguide 40. In accordance with the teachings of this invention, the fact that such good thermal contact has been established can be detected through use of sensor 46. In particular, as seen in
Referring for example to
Referring again to the Figures, and in particular to
However, since cooling of the skin may vary depending on a number of factors, including variations in the equipment being utilized, the color and nature of the patient's skin, the thickness of the patient's skin and the like, it is preferable that the temperature at the DE junction be measured and that the radiation source 12 be operated as soon as this temperature has dropped to a desired level. As can be seen from
During the firing of the radiation source, control 20 continues to monitor the temperature at sensor 46. If at any time during the firing of the radiation source, there is an increase in temperature at sensor 46 which deviates from what would be anticipated from profile 90, controls 20 can immediately turn off the source 12 to prevent any thermal damage to the patient's epidermis 22.
While for certain treatments, the system of this invention may be able to detect successful completion of the treatment, this is not easy to do, particularly for treatments being performed several millimeters into the dermis. The radiation source is therefore typically fired for a predetermined time interval and/or head 16 is maintained in contact with the patient's skin for a predetermined time interval. Control 20 may determine when such time interval has expired, turn off source 12 when such time period has passed and perhaps generate an audio or visual indication to the operator to remove head 16 from the patient's skim These steps also reduce the skill level required for using the system.
As indicated earlier, one problem with utilizing radiation to treat dermatological conditions is that a significant portion of the radiation applied to the patient's skin is back-scattered and lost, therefore increasing the power required from the radiation source utilized, and thus the cost of the system. One solution to this problem is to efficiently collect radiation back-scattered from the patient's skin and to reflect such radiation back into the patient's skin with minimum loss.
In the discussion above, the side walls and back walls of both waveguide 40 and chamber 60 are fully reflecting so that substantially all of the light retroreflected into waveguide 40 is returned to the patient's skin. However, since radiation entering the waveguide from the skin (before refraction on entering the waveguide), is retroreflected back into the patient's skin at substantially the same angle, such radiation at relatively sharp angles, (i.e., at angles more nearly parallel to the patient's skin than perpendicular) contributes primarily to heating the patient's epidermis, potentially causing thermal damage thereto, without reaching region 30, and therefore without having any therapeutic effect. It is therefore preferable that such sharply angled radiation not be retroreflected or that, as a minimum, the retroreflection of such radiation be substantially attenuated. This can be accomplished in the embodiment of
Patient's skin type may also be determined by taking two successive readings, one with head 16 not in contact with the patient's skin and a second with the head in contact with the patient's skin. Curve 93 is an example of the output which is obtained when the head is in contact with the patient's skin, while curve 97 which would start at time t2, is indicative of an output which would be obtained when the laser is fired at time t2 with the head not in contact with the patient's skin. Since the output in air is proportional to the coefficient of absorption for air times the applied laser energy (VA=k0E) and Vs when the head is in contact with the patient's skin is given by Vs=k0E+k0 RE, where R is the coefficient of reflection from the patient's skin, R=(Vs−Va/k0E). Since k0 and E are known values, the difference in voltage for the two readings provides a reliable indication of the coefficient of reflection from the patient's skin in the area under treatment, or in other words of the patient's skin type. The output from temperature sensor 46 may also be utilized for other purposes.
a shows an alternative embodiment of the invention for performing the retroreflector function where the surface area or aperture of waveguide 40 is substantially equal to the optical aperture of radiation applied to the patient's skin. It is therefore smaller than the aperture D of radiation back-scattered from the patient's skin. Therefore, a reflector plate 97 is provided, which may be a specular or diffuse reflector. Plate 97 has a hole which is sized and shaped to permit waveguide 40 to fit therein. Plate 97 may, for example, extend for approximately 1 to 6 millimeters on either side of waveguide 40, but this dimension will vary with application, and can be outside the above range for selected applications. The reflective effect can be enhanced by providing a liquid or other reflective index-matching substance 98 between the skin 18 and the waveguide 40/plate 97, which substance has a reflective index equal or greater than the reflective index of the skin. This decreases the total internal reflection from the skin surface, allowing better return of radiation into the deep layers of skin by reflector 97. Thermoelectric elements 99 in contact with reflective plate 97, which may be formed of a material having good thermal conducting properties such as metal, can be utilized to heat plate 97 to a temperature of, for example, 45-50° C. Plate 97 can thus preheat the area of the patient's skin surrounding the area where radiation is to be applied, thereby increasing the temperature at the treatment area in the dermis, and thus decreasing the light energy required for performing the desired treatment.
Except for the shape of the reflection plate 97′, the embodiment of
a and 6b show another embodiment of the invention which differs from those previously described in that reflection plate 97″ is even more angled than for the embodiment of
In operation, once head 16 is in the position shown in
a-8c show still another embodiment of the invention which differs from that shown in
While three standoff configurations have been shown and/or described above for achieving vacuum pressure, or at least negative pressure, in chamber 99 by collapsing a standoff and then permitting it to return to its normal position, the embodiments shown and/or described are by way of illustration only, and other standoff configurations for achieving the same objective might also be utilized. Further, in addition to the use of vacuum hose 100 as shown in
In the discussion to this point, it has been assumed that the head utilized is applied to a point on a patient's skin where treatment is to be performed and that, after a suitable period of time has passed for cooling of the skin to the DE junction to have occurred, an optical radiation pulse, for example a laser pulse, is applied through the waveguide to treatment area 30.
While the invention has been described above with reference to a particular system 10 and to particular head designs 16, neither are limitations on the invention. In particular, other techniques known in the art, for example circulating water or air, could be utilized for cooling waveguide 40 in lieu of thermoelectronic cooling elements 48, although such thermoelectronic cooling elements are at this time preferred. Some elements 48 (or other thermal control elements) might also be used to heat waveguide 40 to preheat the target area, after which either the same or different thermal control elements would be used to cool the waveguide as previously indicated to cool the patient's epidermis in the treatment area. A lens may also be substituted for waveguide 40, although waveguide 40 is currently preferred because of its superior thermal properties and its superior performance in retroreflection.
This application is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 10/245,825, filed Sep. 17, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,144, which is in turn a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 09/268,433, filed Mar. 12, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,508,813, which application claims priority to Provisional Application 60/115,447, filed Jan. 8, 1999 and Provisional Application 60/077,794, filed Mar. 12, 1998. Said patent application Ser. No. 09/268,433 is also a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 08/759,036, filed Dec. 2, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,015,404; patent application Ser. No. 08/759,136, filed Dec. 2, 1996, now abandoned; and patent application Ser. No. 09/078,055, filed May 13, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,273,884, which application claims priority to Provisional Application 60/046,542, filed May 15, 1997; and Provisional Application 60/077,726, filed Mar. 12, 1998. This application is also a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 09/473,910, filed Dec. 28, 1999, which application claims priority to Provisional Application 60/164,492, filed Nov. 9, 1999; and Provisional Application 60/115,447, filed Jan. 8, 1999. Said patent application Ser. No. 09/473,910 is also a continuation-in-part of said patent application Ser. No. 09/078,055, filed May 13, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,273,884, which application claims priority to Provisional Application 60/046,542, filed May 15, 1997; and Provisional Application 60/077,726, filed Mar. 12, 1998. This application is also a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 09/634,981, filed Aug. 9, 2000, which application is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 09/078,055, filed May 13, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,273,884, which application claims priority to Provisional Application 60/046,542, filed May 15, 1997; and Provisional Application 60/077,726, filed Mar. 12, 1998. All of these applications are incorporated herein by reference. The above applications to which the present application claims priority are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1706161 | Hollnagel | Mar 1929 | A |
2472385 | Rollman | Jun 1949 | A |
3327712 | Kaufman et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3486070 | Engel | Dec 1969 | A |
3527932 | Thomas | Sep 1970 | A |
3538919 | Meyer | Nov 1970 | A |
3622743 | Muncheryan | Nov 1971 | A |
3693623 | Harte et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3818914 | Bender | Jun 1974 | A |
3834391 | Block | Sep 1974 | A |
3846811 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3857015 | Clark et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3900034 | Katz et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4233493 | Nath | Nov 1980 | A |
4273109 | Enderby | Jun 1981 | A |
4275335 | Ishida | Jun 1981 | A |
4316467 | Muckerheide | Feb 1982 | A |
4388924 | Weissman et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4456872 | Froeschle | Jun 1984 | A |
4461294 | Baron | Jul 1984 | A |
4524289 | Hammond et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4539987 | Nath et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4561440 | Kubo et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4591762 | Nakamura | May 1986 | A |
4608978 | Rohr | Sep 1986 | A |
4617926 | Sutton | Oct 1986 | A |
4695697 | Kosa | Sep 1987 | A |
4718416 | Nanaumi | Jan 1988 | A |
4733660 | Itzkan | Mar 1988 | A |
4745909 | Pelton et al. | May 1988 | A |
4747660 | Nishioka et al. | May 1988 | A |
4749913 | Stuermer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4819669 | Politzer | Apr 1989 | A |
4832024 | Boussignac et al. | May 1989 | A |
4860172 | Schlager et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4860744 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4884560 | Kuracina | Dec 1989 | A |
4905690 | Ohshiro et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917084 | Sinofsky | Apr 1990 | A |
4926227 | Jensen | May 1990 | A |
4928038 | Nerone | May 1990 | A |
4930504 | Diamantopoulos et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4945239 | Wist et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5000752 | Hoskin et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5057104 | Chess | Oct 1991 | A |
5059192 | Zaias | Oct 1991 | A |
5065515 | Iderosa | Nov 1991 | A |
5071417 | Sinofsky | Dec 1991 | A |
5108388 | Trokel | Apr 1992 | A |
5127395 | Bontemps | Jul 1992 | A |
5137530 | Sand | Aug 1992 | A |
5140984 | Dew et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5178617 | Kuizenga et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5182557 | Lang | Jan 1993 | A |
5182857 | Simon | Feb 1993 | A |
5196004 | Sinofsky | Mar 1993 | A |
5207671 | Franken et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225926 | Cuomo et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5226907 | Tankovich | Jul 1993 | A |
5267399 | Johnston | Dec 1993 | A |
5282797 | Chess | Feb 1994 | A |
5300097 | Lerner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304170 | Green | Apr 1994 | A |
5306274 | Long | Apr 1994 | A |
5320618 | Gustafsson | Jun 1994 | A |
5334191 | Poppas et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5334193 | Nardella | Aug 1994 | A |
5344418 | Ghaffari | Sep 1994 | A |
5344434 | Talmore | Sep 1994 | A |
5348551 | Spears et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350376 | Brown | Sep 1994 | A |
5358503 | Bertwell et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5380317 | Everett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5403306 | Edwards et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405368 | Eckhouse | Apr 1995 | A |
5415654 | Daikuzono | May 1995 | A |
5425728 | Tankovich | Jun 1995 | A |
5458140 | Eppstein et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474549 | Ortiz et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486172 | Chess | Jan 1996 | A |
5505726 | Meserol | Apr 1996 | A |
5505727 | Keller | Apr 1996 | A |
5519534 | Smith et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522813 | Trelles | Jun 1996 | A |
5531739 | Trelles | Jul 1996 | A |
5531740 | Black | Jul 1996 | A |
5549660 | Mendes et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558667 | Yarborough et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5578866 | DePoorter et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5595568 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5616140 | Prescott | Apr 1997 | A |
5620478 | Eckhouse | Apr 1997 | A |
5626631 | Eckhouse | May 1997 | A |
5630811 | Miller | May 1997 | A |
5649972 | Hochstein | Jul 1997 | A |
5655547 | Karni | Aug 1997 | A |
5658148 | Neuberger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658323 | Miller | Aug 1997 | A |
5660836 | Knowlton | Aug 1997 | A |
5662643 | Kung et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5662644 | Swor | Sep 1997 | A |
5683380 | Eckhouse et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5698866 | Doiron et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707403 | Grove et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5720772 | Eckhouse | Feb 1998 | A |
5722397 | Eppstein | Mar 1998 | A |
5735844 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735884 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742392 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743901 | Grove et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755751 | Eckhouse | May 1998 | A |
5759200 | Azar | Jun 1998 | A |
5769076 | Maekawa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782249 | Weber et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810801 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814008 | Chen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814040 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814041 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817089 | Tankovich et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820625 | Izawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820626 | Baumgardner | Oct 1998 | A |
5824023 | Anderson | Oct 1998 | A |
5827264 | Hohla | Oct 1998 | A |
5828803 | Eckhouse | Oct 1998 | A |
5830208 | Muller | Nov 1998 | A |
5836877 | Zavislan | Nov 1998 | A |
5836999 | Eckhouse et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840048 | Cheng | Nov 1998 | A |
5849029 | Eckhouse et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851181 | Talmor | Dec 1998 | A |
5853407 | Miller | Dec 1998 | A |
5860967 | Zavislan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868731 | Budnik et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871480 | Tankovich | Feb 1999 | A |
5883471 | Rodman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885211 | Eppstein et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885273 | Eckhouse et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885274 | Fullmer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891063 | Vigil | Apr 1999 | A |
5913883 | Alexander et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916211 | Quon et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5944748 | Mager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948011 | Knowlton | Sep 1999 | A |
5949222 | Buono | Sep 1999 | A |
5954710 | Paolini et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955490 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964749 | Eckhouse et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968033 | Fuller et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968034 | Fullmer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977723 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
5984915 | Loeb et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015404 | Altshuler et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022316 | Eppstein et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026828 | Altshuler | Feb 2000 | A |
6027495 | Miller | Feb 2000 | A |
6030399 | Ignotz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032071 | Binder | Feb 2000 | A |
RE36634 | Ghaffari | Mar 2000 | E |
6036684 | Tankovich et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050990 | Tankovich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
D424197 | Sydlowski et al. | May 2000 | S |
6056738 | Marchitto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059820 | Baronov | May 2000 | A |
6074382 | Asah et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080146 | Altshuler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086580 | Mordon et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096029 | O'Donnell, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096209 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104959 | Spertell | Aug 2000 | A |
6117129 | Mukai | Sep 2000 | A |
6120497 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6142939 | Eppstein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149644 | Xie | Nov 2000 | A |
6162055 | Montgomery et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162211 | Tankovich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162212 | Kreindel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173202 | Eppstein | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174325 | Eckhouse | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176854 | Cone | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183434 | Eppstein | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183500 | Kohler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183773 | Anderson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187001 | Azar et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197020 | O'Donnell | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210425 | Chen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214034 | Azar | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228075 | Furumoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6229831 | Nightingale et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235016 | Stewart | May 2001 | B1 |
6236891 | Ingle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245093 | Li et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263233 | Zavislan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264649 | Whitcroft et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267780 | Streeter | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273884 | Altshuler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273885 | Koop et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280438 | Eckhouse et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283956 | McDaniel | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290713 | Russell | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306130 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319274 | Shadduck | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340495 | Sumian et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343933 | Montgomery et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350276 | Knowlton | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354370 | Miller et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358272 | Wilden | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383177 | Balle-Petersen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387089 | Kreindel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402739 | Neev | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406474 | Neuberger et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424852 | Zavislan | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425912 | Knowlton | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436094 | Reuter | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461296 | Desai | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471712 | Burres | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471716 | Pecukonis | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475211 | Chess et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6494900 | Salansky et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508785 | Eppstein | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508813 | Altshuler | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511475 | Altshuler et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514243 | Eckhouse et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517532 | Altshuler et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530915 | Eppstein et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537270 | Elbrecht et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558372 | Altshuler | May 2003 | B1 |
6572637 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602245 | Thiberg | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605080 | Altshuler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629971 | McDaniel | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6629989 | Akita | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632219 | Baranov et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635075 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641600 | Kohler | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648904 | Altshuler et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653618 | Zenzie | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660000 | Neuberger et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663620 | Altshuler et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663658 | Kollias et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663659 | McDaniel | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676654 | Balle-Petersen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679837 | Daikuzono | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685699 | Eppstein et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689124 | Thiberg | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709269 | Altshuler | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709446 | Lundahl et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723090 | Altshuler et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743222 | Durkin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770069 | Hobart et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790205 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6808532 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
RE38670 | Asah et al. | Dec 2004 | E |
6878144 | Altshuler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888319 | Inochkin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
20010041886 | Inochkin et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020005475 | Zenzine | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026225 | Segal | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020091377 | Anderson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123745 | Svaasand et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128635 | Altshuler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161357 | Anderson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173780 | Altshuler et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004499 | McDaniel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023283 | NcDaniel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032900 | Ella | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032950 | Altshuler et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036680 | Black | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055414 | Altshuler et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057875 | Inochkin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065314 | Altshuler et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100936 | Altshuler et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109787 | Black | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109860 | Black | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129154 | McDaniel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030187486 | Savage et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195494 | Altshuler et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199859 | Altshuler et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030232303 | Black | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006332 | Black | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010298 | Altshuler et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015156 | Vasily | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024388 | Altshuler | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030326 | Altshuler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034319 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034341 | Altshuler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073079 | Altshuler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082940 | Black et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085026 | Inochkin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093042 | Altshuler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133251 | Altshuler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143920 | Nanda | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147984 | Altshuler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162549 | Altshuler et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162596 | Altshuler et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040191729 | Altshuler et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193235 | Altshuler et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193236 | Altshuler et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199227 | Altshuler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204745 | Altshuler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210276 | Altshuler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214132 | Altshuler | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225339 | Yaroslavsky et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230258 | Altshuler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050038418 | Altshuler et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049582 | DeBenedicits et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049658 | Connors et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107849 | Altshuler et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
400305 | Apr 1995 | AT |
1851583 | Mar 1984 | AU |
3837248 | May 1990 | DE |
9102407 | Jul 1991 | DE |
0142671 | May 1985 | EP |
0565331 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0598984 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0724894 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0726083 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0736308 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0755698 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0763371 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0765673 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0765674 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0783904 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0884066 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0885629 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1038505 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1138349 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1147785 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1219258 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1226787 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 457 234 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2199453 | Apr 1974 | FR |
2591902 | Jun 1987 | FR |
2044908 | Oct 1980 | GB |
2123287 | Feb 1984 | GB |
2356570 | May 2001 | GB |
2360946 | Oct 2001 | GB |
2368020 | Apr 2002 | GB |
2390021 | Dec 2003 | GB |
2397528 | Jul 2004 | GB |
2001145520 | May 2001 | JP |
2003192809 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2082337 | Jun 1997 | RU |
2089126 | Sep 1997 | RU |
2089127 | Oct 1997 | RU |
2096051 | Nov 1997 | RU |
2122848 | Oct 1998 | RU |
WO 8602783 | May 1986 | WO |
WO 9000420 | Jan 1990 | WO |
WO 9216338 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9219165 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9305920 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9515725 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9532441 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9623447 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9625979 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9636396 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9641579 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9713458 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9804317 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9824507 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9851235 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9852481 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9858595 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9917666 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9917667 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9927997 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9929243 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9938569 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9946005 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9949937 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0002491 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0003257 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0032272 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0040266 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0043070 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0064537 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0071045 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0074781 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0078242 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0103257 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0126573 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0134048 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0142671 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0154606 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0154770 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0253050 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02094116 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2004073537 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004084752 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004086947 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005007003 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050171517 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60164492 | Nov 1999 | US | |
60115447 | Jan 1999 | US | |
60077794 | Mar 1998 | US | |
60077726 | Mar 1998 | US | |
60046542 | May 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10245825 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 11093693 | US | |
Parent | 09634981 | Aug 2000 | US |
Child | 10245825 | US | |
Parent | 09473910 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09634981 | US | |
Parent | 09268433 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 09473910 | US | |
Parent | 09078055 | May 1998 | US |
Child | 09268433 | US | |
Parent | 08759136 | Dec 1996 | US |
Child | 09078055 | US | |
Parent | 08759036 | Dec 1996 | US |
Child | 08759136 | US |