Cubicles, also known as cubicle desks, office cubicles or cubicle workstations, offer a less expensive alternative to office design and layout. A cubicle is a partially enclosed workspace, separated from neighboring workspaces by partitions that are usually 4 to 8 feet tall. Its purpose is to isolate office workers from the sights and noises of an open workspace, the theory being that this allows workers more privacy, and personalization, and helps them to concentrate without distractions. Horizontal work surfaces are usually suspended from the vertical walls of cubicles, as is shelving, overhead storage, and other amenities. Within the cubicle walls often run conduits that carry electrical and communications lines (i.e., telephone and internet), allowing each cubicle easy connection as would be the case in a traditional office space.
Often the building housing the cubicles is a single large room, and the cubicle can be used to compartmentalize that large room into individual work areas. And as the needs of the company change, say for example more people are hired, then the existing cubicles can be reconfigured to accommodate the change. This is a marked difference from traditional office space design that would require the erection of permanent walls to create individual offices. Traditional office design would not allow the work space to accommodate the changes in the company needs, instead requiring very expensive demolition and relocation of permanent walls including all of the electrical and communication lines encased within those walls.
Existing cubicles come in a variety of vertical heights from 4 to 8 feet tall. Once the cubicle walls are installed, then several attachments can be made to those walls including shelves, bookcases, filing cabinet and desks. Also once installed an electrician will route the required electrical and communication lines through the cubicle wall conduits. Therefore, while cubicles are a flexible alternative accommodating changes in layout and design, there can be significant expense in disassembling and reconstructing the cubicles when certain accommodations are desired.
One such accommodation is extending the height of the existing cubicle wall. For example, a work space may be initially provisioned as a collaborative space requiring constant face time between peers such that lower 4 foot walls would be appropriate. However, that space may then be converted to a call center/customer service center requiring less collaboration and more separation (for example to lessen the amount of ambient noise to the customer when calling in).
Available cubicle design techniques and structure would require that shorter walls be replaced with taller walls. This, in turn, would require that the entire cubicle be disassembled (walls and attached horizontal surfaces), the internal wiring removed, new taller walls installed, new internal wiring run and the horizontal surfaces reinstalled. Not only is this expensive in installation labor and materials (i.e., new cubicle walls), it is also highly disruptive requiring the cubicles be off-line for several hours, if not days.
What is therefore needed is a system for quickly and inexpensively extending the height of vertical walls on a cubicle.
What is disclosed herein is a system for extending the height of a cubicle wall. The system comprises a vertical wall extender and a clamp. The clamp further includes and upper channel that receives the vertical wall extender, the upper channel further includes a fixing element that fixes the vertical wall extender to the upper channel, and a screw. The clamp also includes a lower channel that is mounted to the existing cubicle wall, the lower channel further includes two halves, the first half containing a nut channel with a nut disposed therein, the second half containing a slot through which the screw can thread into the nut. The fixing elements may be a screw, and the screws used in the clamp may be allen screws. The lower channel may have protrusions to help stabilize the mount to the existing cubicle wall. The slot in the lower channel may be elongated so as to allow the position of the upper channel to be adjusted. And the nut channel may further include a plug or a narrowing so as to prevent the nut from escaping the nut channel.
A method of installing the system is also disclosed. The method includes adjusting the lower channel halves so as to receive the cubicle wall, sliding those halves towards each other, adjusting the position of the upper channel and tightening the screw. Then the vertical wall extender can be inserted into the upper channel and the fixing element can be actuated to fix the vertical wall extender to the upper channel, which in turn is fixed to the clamp.
This disclosure involves a novel system for extending the height of cubicle walls. The system is inexpensive and does not require replacement of existing walls, nor the attendant costs involved in disassembly and installation under current cubicle systems. Moreover, the system can be installed quickly with very little interruption to the occupants of the cubicles, keeping downtime at a minimum.
The second half (205) has a slot (220) which allows screw (225) to access the nut (215), fixing the entire clamp together as one assembly. Because of the nut channel (210) and slot (220), halves (205 and 205) may be adjusted relative to each other to result in a variety of different widths of the lower channel (105), and the screw (225) can then be tightened to maintain the selected width of the lower channel (105). And because the nut (215) is restricted from spinning within the nut channel (210), simply turning the screw (225) will fix the entire clamp (100). This feature is important for several reasons. First, it allows for easy installation of the clamp (100) with only one tool. Second, the nut (215) is disposed within the nut channel (210) and therefore will not become dislodged and lost. And third, the clamp (100) may be installed flush to the top of the existing cubicle wall without requiring a gap through which the nut must be accessed, which results in a more stable mount.
The upper channel (110) is adapted to receive a vertical wall extender (shown in
Installation of the clamp (100) is as follows. The installer would loosen screw (125) opening the lower channel (105) (i.e., sliding halves 200 and 205 away from each other) wide enough to accommodate the existing cubicle wall. Then, the clamp (100) would be placed on the existing cubicle wall. Halves (200 and 205) would be pushed toward each other constricting the lower channel (105) onto the existing cubicle wall, and allowing protrusions (115) to “bite” into the existing cubicle wall. It should be noted that cubicle walls are often made of a solid core covered with stuffing and a fabric exterior, resulting in walls that are soft and indentable like a pillow. Because of this pillow-like compliance, the protrusions (115) can be extremely effective in securely mounting the clamp to the existing cubicle wall. The installer would then adjust the location of the upper channel (110) (i.e., on center or favoring one side). Once those adjustments are made then the screw (225) is tightened. At this point the clamp (100) is fixed to the existing cubicle wall. The installer will repeat this process affixing as many clamps (100) as necessary to provide a stable mount for the vertical wall extender. Once all the clamps (100) are fixed to the existing cubicle wall, then the vertical wall extender can be inserted into the upper channel (110) and the fixing element actuated so as to fix the vertical extender to the clamp (110).
While particular preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed, it will be appreciated that many various modifications and extensions of the above described technology may be implemented using the teaching of this patent application. All such modifications and extensions are intended to be included within the true spirit and scope of this patent application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4559738 | Helfman | Dec 1985 | A |
4774792 | Ballance | Oct 1988 | A |
D307286 | Ginder | Apr 1990 | S |
5031660 | Magee | Jul 1991 | A |
5822918 | Helfman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5984249 | Cohen | Nov 1999 | A |
6533019 | King et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6772567 | Diffrient, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6817149 | Diffrient et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854233 | Pitsch et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7032862 | Landes et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7191990 | Hutter, III | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7243449 | Wichmann | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7391624 | Hutter, III | Jun 2008 | B2 |
8251443 | Hahn et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
20040250480 | Matthai | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060096061 | Weiland et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120285103 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |