This invention was developed by BaySaver Technologies Inc. (BaySaver) a manufacturer of stormwater pollution controls based in Maryland. BaySaver is licensed under U.S. Patents on several different physical separators, including patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,746,911 and 6,264,835, both titled “Apparatus for separating a heavy fluid from a light fluid.” While physical separators accomplish a great deal and are an important factor in environmental protection, they do not remove dissolved contaminants, nor do they remove sediment particles in the fine silt and clay size range.
Filtration is a proven method of removing dissolved and very fine impurities from a fluid. The most commonly used filter in the stormwater industry is a depth filter. A depth filter uses a media (sand, for example) that the fluid must pass through. The removal is achieved by a combination of two mechanisms: transport and attachment. In a sand filter, the individual grains obstruct the flow of water, forcing the fluid to take a more tortuous path through the filter. When this happens, the fluid comes into contact with far more of the media than it would if it were to flow straight through the filter. The fluid, along with the impurities to be removed, is in contact with the individual grains of sand or other filter media. Bringing the contaminants into contact with the filter media is the first stage—the contaminants are transported into contact with the filter media.
In order to remove the pollutants from the fluid, the media must have some way of capturing and retaining the contaminant. This can be accomplished in a number of ways, from chemical bonding on reactive media to simple sedimentation in the interstices between the media components. When designed carefully, media filtration is capable of removing large pollutant loads from influent fluid streams. The present invention can be used to remove fine sediments, and other entrained pollutants such as oils and grease, and dissolved contaminants from runoff streams. It can also be used to reduce turbidity in the same applications.
The selection of filter media can depend on many factors, including the type of contaminants targeted for removal, the desired flow rates through the filter, the cost and weight of the media, and other factors. While filtration is a proven technology in fields like wastewater treatment, drinking water treatment and industrial processes, it is relatively new in the field of stormwater treatment.
One of the challenges of stormwater management is dealing with the highly variable runoff flow rates, that result from storms. In stormwater applications, treatment devices are subjected to widely varying flow rates, from very slow trickles to the runoff resulting from torrential downpours. To accommodate these variations, many stormwater treatment devices are designed with an internal or external bypass. The bypass allows flows in excess of the intended treatment capacity to pass through the unit untreated, while continuing to treat flows within the intended range. This is a viable technology because of the “first flush” effect in stormwater runoff. During the beginning of a storm event, a “flush” of contaminants is carried off of a site with the first bit of runoff. This flush includes the pollutants that have collected on that site since the last storm, and comprises the majority of the pollution load from each storm event. If the first flush is treated adequately, a majority of the potential contaminants will be removed during that treatment and the subsequent bypass flows during extreme storms will not contain the same heavy pollutant loads.
This invention relates broadly to a system for filtering a fluid, however one specific application of the invention is to remove small particles, including dissolved contaminants, from runoff water. In treating runoff water it is desirable, but not necessary, to first remove the large particles of contaminants by gravity separation (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,746,911 and/or 6,264,835 by Thomas E. Pank). Thereafter, the runoff water is fed to the present invention (FIGS. 1 to 12 incl.) for removal of small particles and/or dissolved contaminants.
The present invention employs a large vault or tank for receiving the runoff water. There are one or more small tanks in the large tank (vault). Each small tank is inverted and receives water, from the large tank, at its open lower end. The water entering the small tank rises, as the water level in the large tank rises, and flows upward through a filter. When the water level rises above the top of the filter it enters an outlet tube or pipe and then flows downwardly along the center-line of the filter. A float, a valve and a check valve may cause the system to function as a siphon and feed the filtered clean water to an outlet. Alternatively the siphoning effect will occur if the inside diameter of said outlet tube is small enough to form a partial vacuum.
While my overall device is primarily for use in cleaning runoff water, various features of the invention have widespread application in the field of filtering; hence many of the claims are not limited to cleaning runoff water.
The invention is a modular filter system for stormwater runoff treatment. The filter itself comprises several layers of drainage material and filter material as described in the copending application of Thomas E. Pank, which has been published, see Publication No. U.S. 2005-0178719A-2 dated Aug. 18, 2005.
The complete invention comprises a filter cartridge 21 that is placed in a housing, or large tank, 19. Contaminated fluid enters the housing input tank 19 through an inlet means 17 and accumulates within said housing 19. The fluid may be contaminated with solid particles, undesirable gases, dissolved chemicals, or other pollutants. Within the housing 19, the contaminated fluid enters the filter cartridge 21 and is directed through the filter media 11 contained in said cartridge 21 to remove contaminants from said fluid. Said fluid displaces air within said cartridge 21 through a check valve 14, establishing a siphon effect. The siphon continues to pull fluid from said housing through said filter cartridge until the siphon is broken and air is reintroduced into the filter cartridge.
The method of constructing the invention is also a part of this application. The filter cartridge is constructed by rolling a layered filter around a center drain pipe.
There are numerous forms that the layers 7, 8 and 9 may take and we will set forth two of those forms.
In one of said forms: (a) the strips 7 and 9 may be made of polypropylene cloth and have a thickness of 0.3 inches and a width of 30 inches; and (b) the filter strip 8 is made of high grade geotextile fabric, has a thickness of 0.3 inches and a width of 30 inches.
Another form that the layers 7, 8 and 9 may take is described in the next four paragraphs.
Inlet layer 7 and outlet layer 9 may be defined by permeable material that maintains the shape of said layers so that said layers are empty. In one form of the invention, however, said layers comprise two separate plastic materials: two layers of a relatively rigid high density polyethylene (HDPE) drainage material that provides structure to said layers and an ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) material fills the space between said layers. In the current mode of that invention, said HDPE material is Poly-flex (a registered trademark). Drainage Net, and said interior filter material is Matala™.
Poly-flex Drainage Net is a high-density polyethylene product between 0.25 and 0.50 inches thick, consisting of two sides. Each side has one series of ridges 31 that run parallel to each other and are arranged at a 45 angle. Said ridges allow water to flow along said material, even when said material is placed directly against a solid surface. The material can be rolled into a spiral in only one direction at time due to its design. When rolled, the grid develops limited rigidity perpendicular to the direction of the roll, thereby lending itself to creating a vertical spiral roll with structural integrity. This integrity also provides stability for the loose media rolled in the filter. In the present mode of this invention, inlet layer 7 and outlet layer 9 are each defined by two layers of Poly-flex Drainage Net.
Matala mat is placed between the two layers of Poly-flex Drainage Net that define inlet layer 7 and outlet layer 9. Matala is a proprietary material developed using the plastic EVA, which is extruded from nozzles to form spaghetti-like strands that adhere to one another. Said strands create a matrix with large amounts of open void space, through which water can flow freely. Because of the properties of EVA, Matala mats are both flexible and compressible, allowing them to be wrapped in a spiral between layers of Poly-flex Drainage Net. The mats used in the present invention vary in thickness between ¾ of an inch and 1½ inches.
Outer walls 12 are affixed to the rolled filter cartridge to contain the rolled layers in place. In conjunction with ceiling 13, the outer walls 12 form a space 5 at the top of the interior of said filter cartridge, as shown in
During operation, each “lap” around the centerline functions in the same way.
In the complete invention, one or more of the filter cartridges are housed in a single large structure such as large tank 19 as shown in
Contaminated fluid enters the invention through inlet means 17. The fluid flows from inlet means 17 and into housing structure 19. Housing structure 19 is in communication with the cartridge inlet layer 7 in each lap of the rolled filter cartridge. The contaminated fluid flows upwards from the housing structure 19 into cartridge inlet layer 7 through openings 15. In the cartridge inlet layer 7, the fluid makes a 90 degree turn and flows through permeable barrier 11 (if present) and into the filter media 8. The fluid flows through the filter media 8, where the contaminants are removed by the media, passes through permeable barrier 11 (if present), and into the fluid outlet layer 9. In the fluid outlet layer 9, the fluid once again makes a 90 degree turn and flows upward through openings 16 into space 5. From space 5, the treated fluid flows downward through drain 4 towards flow restriction 10.
When the contaminated fluid flow rate into the filter cartridge exceeds the discharge flow rate allowed by flow restriction 10, said fluid displaces the air within space 5. Said air is evacuated from space 5 through check valve 14. Once vertical drain 4 is filled with fluid, a siphon is established. This siphon continues to pull contaminated fluid into the filter cartridge as long as the fluid level within housing structure 19 is high enough to prevent air from entering the filter cartridge.
Treated effluent fluid flows through restriction 10 and into horizontal conveyance 20. Horizontal conveyance 20 carries treated fluid through housing wall 18 and to the outfall of the invention.
Flow restriction 10, shown in greater detail in
We claim the benefit of our prior copending U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/718,717, filed Sep. 20, 2005. The present application is a continuation-in-part of prior copending application Ser. No. 11/030,939 filed Jan. 5, 2005 of co-inventor Thomas E. Pank. We also claim the benefit of co-inventor Pank's provisional 60/543,942 filed Feb. 12, 2004.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 60718717 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 11522150 | Sep 2006 | US |
Parent | 11030939 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 11522150 | Sep 2006 | US |