The present invention relates to a system for fermentation of biomass in the production of ethanol. The present invention also relates to a system for fermentation of biomass that has been pre-treated and separated into a first component and a second component. The present invention further relates to a system for fermentation of a first component of biomass using an ethanologen capable of fermenting xylose into ethanol.
Ethanol can be produced from grain-based feedstocks (e.g. corn, sorghum/milo, barley, wheat, soybeans, etc.), from sugar (e.g. from sugar cane, sugar beets, etc.), and from biomass (e.g. from lignocellulosic feedstocks such as switchgrass, corn cobs and stover, wood or other plant material).
Biomass comprises plant matter that can be suitable for direct use as a fuel/energy source or as a feedstock for processing into another bioproduct (e.g., a biofuel such as cellulosic ethanol) produced at a biorefinery (such as an ethanol plant). Biomass may comprise, for example, corn cobs and stover (e.g., stalks and leaves) made available during or after harvesting of the corn kernels, fiber from the corn kernel, switchgrass, farm or agricultural residue, wood chips or other wood waste, and other plant matter (grown for processing into bioproducts or for other purposes). In order to be used or processed, biomass will be harvested and collected from the field and transported to the location where it is to be used or processed.
In a conventional ethanol plant producing ethanol from corn, ethanol is produced from starch. Corn kernels are cleaned and milled to prepare starch-containing material for processing. (Corn kernels can also be fractionated to separate the starch-containing material (e.g. endosperm) from other matter (such as fiber and germ).) The starch-containing material is slurried with water and liquefied to facilitate saccharification where the starch is converted into sugar (e.g. glucose) and fermentation where the sugar is converted by an ethanologen (e.g. yeast) into ethanol. The product of fermentation (i.e. fermentation product) is beer, which comprises a liquid component containing ethanol and water and soluble components, and a solids component containing unfermented particulate matter (among other things). The fermentation product is sent to a distillation system. In the distillation system, the fermentation product is distilled and dehydrated into ethanol. The residual matter (e.g. whole stillage) comprises water, soluble components, oil and unfermented solids (i.e. the solids component of the beer with substantially all ethanol removed that can be dried into dried distillers grains (DDG) and sold as an animal feed product). Other co-products, for example syrup (and oil contained in the syrup), can also be recovered from the stillage. Water removed from the fermentation product in distillation can be treated for re-use at the plant.
In a biorefinery configured to produce ethanol from biomass, ethanol is produced from lignocellulosic material. Lignocellulosic biomass typically comprises cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Cellulose (a type of glucan) is a polysaccharide comprising hexose (C6) sugar monomers such as glucose linked in linear chains. Hemicellulose is a branched chain polysaccharide that may comprise several different pentose (C5) sugar monomers (such as xylose and arabinose) and small amounts of hexose (C6) sugar monomers in branched chains.
The biomass is prepared so that sugars in the lignocellulosic material (such as glucose from the cellulose and xylose from the hemicellulose) can be made accessible and fermented into a fermentation product from which ethanol can be recovered. After fermentation the fermentation product is sent to the distillation system, where the ethanol is recovered by distillation and dehydration. Other bioproducts such as lignin and organic acids may also be recovered as by-products or co-products during the processing of biomass into ethanol. Determination of how to more efficiently prepare and treat the biomass for production into ethanol will depend upon the source and type or composition of the biomass. Biomass of different types or from different sources is likely to vary in properties and composition (e.g. relative amounts of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and other components). For example the composition of wood chips will differ from the composition of corn cobs or switchgrass.
It would be advantageous to provide for a system for treatment of biomass to facilitate the production of ethanol. It would also be advantageous to provide for a system to fermenting biomass for the production of ethanol. It would further be advantageous to provide for a system that provided one or more of features to facilitate improvement in the efficiency and yield of cellulosic ethanol from biomass.
The present invention relates to a method for producing a fermentation product in a fermentation system from biomass that has been pre-treated and separated into a first component and a second component. The method comprises the steps of supplying the first component to the fermentation system; providing an ethanologen to the fermentation system; maintaining the first component and ethanologen in the fermentation system at a temperature of between about 26 and about 37 degrees Celsius and at a pH of between about 4.5 and about 6.0 for a time of no less than 18 hours; and recovering the fermentation product from the fermentation system. The ethanologen is supplied to the fermentation system in a concentration of less than 150 grams of ethanologen on a dry basis per liter of first component. The biomass comprises lignocellulosic material; the lignocellulosic material comprises at least one of corn cobs, corn plant husks, corn plant leaves and corn plant stalks. The first component comprises pentose; the pentose comprises xylose. The ethanologen is capable of fermenting xylose into ethanol.
The present invention also relates to a fermentation system configured to produce a fermentation product from biomass that has been pre-treated and separated into a first component and a second component. The system comprises a first vessel configured to receive the first component and an ethanologen and a second vessel configured to propagate the ethanologen for supply to the first vessel. The first vessel is configured to maintain the first component and ethanologen at a temperature of between about 31 and about 34 degrees Celsius and at a pH of between about 5.2 and about 5.8 for a time of no less than 18 hours. The biomass comprises lignocellulosic material; the lignocellulosic material comprises at least one of corn cobs, corn plant husks, corn plant leaves and corn plant stalks. The first component comprises pentose; the pentose comprises xylose.
The present invention further relates to a biorefinery for producing a fermentation product from biomass. The biorefinery comprises a preparation system to prepare the biomass into prepared biomass; a pre-treatment system to pre-treat the prepared biomass with a dilute acid for separation into a first component from which pentose can accessed for fermentation and a second component from which hexose can be made available for fermentation; a first treatment system to treat the first component into a treated first component by removing removed components from the first component; a first fermentation system to produce a first fermentation product from the pentose by supplying an ethanologen and maintaining the first component and ethanologen at a temperature of between about 26 and about 37 degrees Celsius and at a pH of between about 4.5 and about 6.0 for a time of no less than 18 hours; a distillation system to recover ethanol from the first fermentation product; and a treatment system to process removed components. The biomass comprises lignocellulosic material; the lignocellulosic material comprises at least one of corn cobs, corn plant husks, corn plant leaves and corn plant stalks.
TABLES 1A and 1B list the composition of biomass comprising lignocellulosic plant material from the corn plant according to exemplary and representative embodiments.
TABLES 2A and 2B list the composition of the liquid component of pre-treated biomass according to exemplary and representative embodiments.
TABLES 3A and 3B list the composition of the solids component of pre-treated biomass according to exemplary and representative embodiments.
TABLES 4 through 7 provide data and results relating to the use of the fermentation system according to an exemplary embodiment.
Referring to
According to an exemplary embodiment, the biorefinery is configured to produce ethanol from biomass in the form of a lignocellulosic feedstock such as plant material from the corn plant (e.g. corn cobs and corn stover). Lignocellulosic feedstock such as lignocellulosic material from the corn plant comprises cellulose (from which C6 sugars such as glucose can be made available) and/or hemicellulose (from which C5 sugars such as xylose and arabinose can be made available).
As shown in
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
According to a preferred embodiment, the biomass comprises plant material from the corn plant, such as corn cobs, husks and leaves and stalks (e.g. at least upper half or three-quarters portion of the stalk); the composition of the plant material (i.e. cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) will be approximately as indicated in TABLES 1A and 1B (i.e. after at least initial preparation of the biomass, including removal of any foreign matter). According to a preferred embodiment, the plant material comprises corn cobs, husks/leaves and stalks; for example, the plant material may comprise (by weight) up to 100 percent cobs, up to 100 percent husks/leaves, approximately 50 percent cobs and approximately 50 percent husks/leaves, approximately 30 percent cobs and approximately 50 percent husks/leaves and approximately 20 percent stalks, or any other combinations of cobs, husks/leaves and stalks from the corn plant. See TABLE 1A. According to an alternative embodiment, the lignocellulosic plant material may comprise fiber from the corn kernel (e.g. in some combination with other plant material). TABLE 1B provides typical and expected ranges believed to be representative of the composition of biomass comprising lignocellulosic material from the corn plant. According to exemplary embodiments, the lignocellulosic plant material of the biomass (from the corn plant) will comprise (by weight) cellulose at about 30 to 55 percent, hemicellulose at about 20 to 50 percent, and lignin at about 10 to 25 percent; according to a particularly preferred embodiment, the lignocellulosic plant material of the biomass (i.e. cobs, husks/leaves and stalk portions from the corn plant) will comprise (by weight) cellulose at about 35 to 45 percent, hemicellulose at about 24 to 42 percent, and lignin at about 12 to 20 percent. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, pre-treatment of the biomass will yield a liquid component that comprises (by weight) xylose at no less than 1.0 percent and a solids component that comprises (by weight) cellulose (from which glucose can be made available) at no less than 45 percent.
Referring to
According to a preferred embodiment, in the pre-treatment system an acid will be applied to the prepared biomass to facilitate the break down of the biomass for separation into the liquid component (C5 stream from which fermentable C5 sugars can be recovered) and the solids component (C6 stream from which fermentable C6 sugars can be accessed). According to a preferred embodiment, the acid can be applied to the biomass in a reaction vessel under determined operating conditions (i.e. acid concentration, pH, temperature, time, pressure, solids loading, flow rate, supply of process water or steam, etc.) and the biomass can be agitated/mixed in the reaction vessel to facilitate the break down of the biomass. According to exemplary embodiments, an acid such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, acetic acid, etc. (or a formulation/mixture of acids) can be applied to the biomass. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, sulfuric acid will be applied to the biomass in pre-treatment.
The liquid component (C5 stream) comprises water, dissolved sugars (such as xylose, arabinose and glucose) to be made available for fermentation into ethanol, acids and other soluble components recovered from the hemicellulose. (TABLE 2B provides typical and expected ranges believed to be representative of the composition of biomass comprising lignocellulosic material from the corn plant.) According to an exemplary embodiment, the liquid component may comprise approximately 5 to 7 percent solids (i.e. suspended/residual solids such as partially-hydrolyzed hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin). According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the liquid component will comprise at least 2 to 4 percent xylose (by weight); according to other exemplary embodiments, the liquid component will comprise no less than 1 to 2 percent xylose (by weight). TABLES 2A and 2B list the composition of the liquid component of pre-treated biomass (from prepared biomass as indicated in TABLES 1A and 1B) according to exemplary and representative embodiments.
The solids component (C6 stream) comprises water, acids and solids such as cellulose from which sugar, such as glucose, can be made available for fermentation into ethanol, and lignin. (TABLE 3B provides typical and expected ranges believed to be representative of the composition of biomass comprising lignocellulosic material from the corn plant.) According to an exemplary embodiment, the solids component may comprise approximately 10 to 40 percent solids (by weight) (after separation); according to a particularly preferred embodiment, the solids component will comprise approximately 20 to 30 percent solids (by weight). According to a preferred embodiment, the solids in the solids component comprise no less than 30 percent cellulose and the solids component may also comprise other dissolved sugars (e.g. glucose and xylose). TABLES 3A and 3B list the composition of the solids component of pre-treated biomass (from prepared biomass as indicated in TABLES 1A and 1B) according to exemplary and representative embodiments.
During pre-treatment, the severity of operating conditions (such as pH, temperature and time) may cause formation of components that are inhibitory to fermentation. For example, under some conditions, the dehydration of C5 sugars (such as xylose or arabinose) may cause the formation of furfural and/or hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Acetic acid may also be formed, for example when acetate is released during the break down of cellulose in pre-treatment. Sulfuric acid, which may be added to prepared biomass to facilitate pre-treatment, if not removed or neutralized, may also be inhibitory to fermentation. According to an exemplary embodiment, by adjusting pre-treatment conditions (such as pH, temperature and time), the formation of inhibitors can be reduced or managed; according to other exemplary embodiments, components of the pre-treated biomass may be given further treatment to remove or reduce the level of inhibitors (or other undesirable matter).
Referring to
Treatment of the C5 stream (liquid component) of the biomass may be performed in an effort to remove components that are inhibitory to efficient fermentation (e.g. furfural, HMF, sulfuric acid and acetic acid) and residual lignin (or other matter) that may not be fermentable from the C5 sugar component so that the sugars (e.g. xylose, arabinose, as well as other sugars such as glucose) are available for fermentation. The C5 sugars in the C5 stream may also be concentrated to improve the efficiency of fermentation (e.g. to improve the titer of ethanol for distillation).
Treatment of the C6 stream (solids component) of the biomass may be performed to make the C6 sugars available for fermentation. According to a preferred embodiment, hydrolysis (such as enzyme hydrolysis) may be performed to access the C6 sugars in the cellulose; treatment may also be performed in an effort to remove lignin and other non-fermentable components in the C6 stream (or to remove components such as residual acid or acids that may be inhibitory to efficient fermentation).
According to an exemplary embodiment shown in
Referring to
According to an exemplary embodiment, the fermentation product is produced in the fermentation system by application of the ethanologen to convert the sugars in the C5 stream (hydrolysate of the pre-treated biomass) into ethanol. According to a preferred embodiment, the ethanologen for the fermentation system may comprise an organism (i.e. yeast) selected for efficient fermentation of the xylose and glucose that is present in the C5 stream. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the ethanologen for the C5 stream may be a genetically modified organism as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,622,284, assigned to Royal Nedalco B. V. According to an alternative embodiment, the ethanologen may comprise a formulation or combination of organisms (e.g. one type of yeast selected for fermentation of C5 sugars such as xylose and one type of yeast selected for fermentation of C6 sugars such as glucose). According to exemplary embodiments, the amount or loading (dose) of ethanologen (i.e. yeast cells) may be varied in the operation of the fermentation system. Agents supplied with the ethanologen may include antibiotics, supplemental or accessory enzymes, urea, salts (such as zinc or magnesium salts), or other component providing nutritional or other benefit to the organism.
Referring to
According to an exemplary embodiment using batch fermentation, as shown in
According to an exemplary embodiment using continuous fermentation, as shown in
The fermentation product (which may also be referred to as beer or fermentation broth, or as comprising beer or fermentation broth) will comprise ethanol and water, as well as unfermented matter (e.g. any unfermented sugars) and non-fermentable matter (e.g. residual lignin and other solids). The fermentation product will also comprise in the form of particulate matter the ethanologen (i.e. yeast cells) that was used to produce ethanol, as well as other components produced by the fermentation system, for example, such as glycerol (a product of fermentation) and acetic acid.
As shown in
As shown in
According to other alternative embodiments, for example, using a different form or type of biomass or a different ethanologen, the operating conditions for the fermentation system may be varied as necessary to achieve efficient fermentation.
A series of examples were conducted according to an exemplary embodiment of the fermentation system (as shown in
The fermentation system was used in Example 1 to evaluate the effect of ethanologen loading on the efficacy of the ethanologen in the fermentation of xylose into ethanol, as indicated in
The fermentation system was used in Example 2A to evaluate the efficacy of the ethanologen in the fermentation of xylose in a hydrolysate from the liquid component (i.e. C5 stream) of pre-treated biomass at varying levels of initial loading (i.e. yeast concentration), as indicated in
The fermentation system was used in Example 2B to evaluate the efficacy of the ethanologen in the fermentation of xylose in a hydrolysate from the liquid component (i.e. C5 stream) of pre-treated biomass at varying levels of initial loading (i.e. yeast concentration), as indicated in
The fermentation system was used in Example 3 to evaluate the effect of xylose concentration on the efficacy (and xylose tolerance) of the ethanologen in the fermentation of xylose into ethanol, as indicated in
The embodiments as disclosed and described in the application (including the FIGURES and Examples) are intended to be illustrative and explanatory of the present inventions. Modifications and variations of the disclosed embodiments, for example, of the apparatus and processes employed (or to be employed) as well as of the compositions and treatments used (or to be used), are possible; all such modifications and variations are intended to be within the scope of the present inventions.
The present application claims priority to and incorporates by reference each of the following applications: (a) U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/157,140, titled Process for Fermenting Pentose in Biomass, filed on Mar. 3, 2009; (b) U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/157,142, titled Continuous Fermentation of a Liquid Hydrolysate Containing Pentose, filed on Mar. 3, 2009; and (c) U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/157,137, titled Concentration of Pentose Liquor, filed on Mar. 3, 2009. The present application relates to and incorporates by reference the following applications: (a) U.S. application Ser. No. 12/716,984, titled System for Pre-Treatment of Biomass for the Production of Ethanol, filed on Mar. 3, 2010; (b) U.S. application Ser. No. 12/716,989, titled System for Treatment of Biomass to Facilitate the Production of Ethanol, filed on Mar. 3, 2010; and (c) U.S. application Ser. No. 12/717,002, titled System for Management of Yeast to Facilitate the Production of Ethanol, filed on Mar. 3, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2440925 | Boeckeler | May 1948 | A |
3212932 | Hess et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3940492 | Ehnstrom | Feb 1976 | A |
4009074 | Walon | Feb 1977 | A |
4014743 | Black | Mar 1977 | A |
4029515 | Kiminki et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4092434 | Yoshizumi et al. | May 1978 | A |
4152197 | Lindahl et al. | May 1979 | A |
4168988 | Riehm et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4243750 | Muller et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4279747 | Chen | Jul 1981 | A |
4287303 | Dahlberg et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4309254 | Dahlstrom et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4316956 | Lutzen | Feb 1982 | A |
4342831 | Faber et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4358536 | Thorsson et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4361651 | Keim | Nov 1982 | A |
4376163 | Ehnstrom | Mar 1983 | A |
4425433 | Neves | Jan 1984 | A |
4427453 | Reitter | Jan 1984 | A |
4432805 | Nuuttila et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4460687 | Ehnstrom | Jul 1984 | A |
4461648 | Foody | Jul 1984 | A |
4474883 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4490469 | Kirby et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4514496 | Yoshizumi et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4522920 | Thorsson et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4529699 | Gerez et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4530846 | Nagodawithana et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4540663 | Witt | Sep 1985 | A |
4552616 | Kauppi | Nov 1985 | A |
4591560 | Kainuma et al. | May 1986 | A |
4612286 | Sherman et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4618579 | Dwiggins et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4668340 | Sherman | May 1987 | A |
4716218 | Chen et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4727026 | Sawada et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4752579 | Arena et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4760025 | Estell et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4863864 | Ashikari et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876196 | Salzbrunn et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4908098 | DeLong et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4933279 | Carroll et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941944 | Chang | Jul 1990 | A |
4997488 | Gould et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5061497 | Thacker et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5084385 | Ashikari et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5087417 | Dumbroff et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5125977 | Grohmann et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5171592 | Holtzapple et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177008 | Kampen | Jan 1993 | A |
5177009 | Kampen | Jan 1993 | A |
5180669 | Antrim | Jan 1993 | A |
5221357 | Brink | Jun 1993 | A |
5231017 | Lantero et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5250182 | Bento et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5260089 | Thornberg | Nov 1993 | A |
RE34606 | Estell et al. | May 1994 | E |
5322778 | Antrim et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328562 | Rafferty et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5338366 | Grace et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5364770 | Berka et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366558 | Brink | Nov 1994 | A |
5370999 | Stuart | Dec 1994 | A |
5411594 | Brelsford | May 1995 | A |
5424417 | Torget et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5498766 | Stuart et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5536325 | Brink | Jul 1996 | A |
5545543 | Zinnamosca et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559031 | Zinnamosca et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562777 | Farone et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5580389 | Farone et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5597714 | Farone et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5628830 | Brink | May 1997 | A |
5652127 | Mitchinson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5688674 | Choi et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693296 | Holtzapple et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705369 | Torget et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711817 | Titmas | Jan 1998 | A |
5721127 | Deweer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721128 | Deweer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726046 | Farone et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733758 | Nguyen | Mar 1998 | A |
5736375 | Deweer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5736499 | Mitchinson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5756714 | Antrim et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769934 | Ha et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782982 | Farone et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5817498 | Deweer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820687 | Farone et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824532 | Barnett et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5849549 | Barnett et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5865898 | Holtzapple et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879463 | Proenca | Mar 1999 | A |
5916780 | Foody et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5932452 | Mustranta et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5932456 | Van Draanen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958739 | Mitchinson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5972118 | Hester et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975439 | Chieffalo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981237 | Meagher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6022419 | Torget et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6074854 | Deweer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090595 | Foody et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6136576 | Diaz-Torres et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6171817 | Berka et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6228177 | Torget | May 2001 | B1 |
6313328 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6379504 | Miele et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419788 | Wingerson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423145 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451063 | Clarkson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6509180 | Verser et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538182 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6555350 | Ahring et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6616948 | Gustavsson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620292 | Wingerson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6660506 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664095 | Suryanarayan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6692578 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709527 | Fechter et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6770168 | Stigsson | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774284 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6803218 | Seyfried et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6849439 | Henson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6849782 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855529 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867237 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6878860 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7198925 | Foody | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238242 | Pinatti et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7344876 | Levine | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354743 | Vlasenko et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7455997 | Hughes | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7501025 | Bakker et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503981 | Wyman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7579177 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7585652 | Foody et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7604967 | Yang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7622284 | Op Den Camp et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7649086 | Belanger et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7666637 | Nguyen | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670813 | Foody et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7709042 | Foody et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7754456 | Penttila et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7754457 | Foody et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7807419 | Hennessey et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815741 | Olson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815876 | Olson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819976 | Friend et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7875444 | Yang et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901511 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919291 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8057639 | Pschorn et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057641 | Bartek et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8123864 | Christensen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8288600 | Bartek et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8450094 | Narendranath et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
20020192774 | Ahring et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030134395 | Shetty et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134396 | Shetty et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030180900 | Lanteo | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030203454 | Chotani et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040023349 | Bisgaard-Frantzen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043117 | Cope et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060673 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040063184 | Grichko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080923 | Janisch | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091983 | Veit et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040115779 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040157301 | Chotani et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040192896 | Finch | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197409 | Iyer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219649 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234649 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050026261 | Otto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042737 | Vikso-Nielsen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050069998 | Ballesteros Perdices et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100996 | Lantero, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136525 | Baldwin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050208623 | Baldwin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050233030 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239181 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060051847 | Gunnarsson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060246563 | Eroma et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281157 | Chotani et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070178567 | Lewis | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196907 | Lewis | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202214 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080032373 | Bhargava | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080277082 | Pschorn et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295981 | Shin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090053793 | Lefebvre et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090308383 | Shin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003733 | Foody et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100041116 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100144001 | Horton | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100151549 | Bhargava | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159552 | Benson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100196980 | Smith et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227369 | Narendranath | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233771 | McDonald | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100285553 | Delmas et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110070618 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079219 | McDonald et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110094505 | Bulla et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110097446 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110111085 | Lewis et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110171708 | Larsen | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110250312 | Lewis | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110269202 | Taron et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120129234 | McDonald et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138246 | Christensen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120201947 | Stuart | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120309069 | Bell et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130065289 | Carlson | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130143290 | Narendranath | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130337521 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140024826 | Narendranath et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140065700 | Narendranath et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1143677 | Mar 1983 | CA |
267508 | May 1989 | DE |
0 044 658 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0 098 490 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0138428 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0 140 410 | May 1985 | EP |
0 159 795 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 171 218 | Feb 1986 | EP |
0 884 391 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1 259 466 | Nov 2002 | EP |
2 397 486 | Feb 1979 | FR |
2 609 046 | Jul 1988 | FR |
2089836 | Dec 1981 | GB |
58-005145 | Jan 1983 | JP |
59-179093 | Oct 1984 | JP |
2001103 | Oct 1993 | RU |
2127760 | Mar 1999 | RU |
WO 9103543 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO-9103543 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 9220777 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9408027 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9429475 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9508648 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9513362 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9727047 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9814270 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9856958 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9906133 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0014120 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0061858 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0073221 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0132715 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0160752 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0214598 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0224882 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0238786 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 0238787 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02051561 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02067691 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02070753 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02074895 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03013714 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03018766 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03062430 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03066816 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03066826 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03068976 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03071025 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03078644 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-2004080923 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004080923 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004081193 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004106533 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2004106533 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005052148 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005082155 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005099854 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006032282 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006034590 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006056838 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007009463 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2008095098 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008131229 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008144878 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009045651 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009108773 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010113129 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2010113130 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2011116317 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011159915 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012042497 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012042498 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012103281 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012131665 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Taherzadeh et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 9(9), 1621-1651, 2008. |
De Mancilha et al., “Evaluation of Ion Exchange Resins for Removal of Inhibitory Compounds from Corn Stover Hydrolyzate for Xylitol Fermentation”, Biotechnology Progress, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 1837-1841. |
Gulati et al., “Assessment of Ethanol Production Options for Corn Products”, Bioresource Technology, 1996, vol. 58, pp. 253-264. |
Jeffries et al., “Fermentation of Hemicellulosic Sugars and Sugar Mixtures by Candida shehatae”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1988, vol. 31, pp. 502-506. |
Nigam et al., “Enzyme and microbial systems involved in starch processing”, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1995, vol. 17, pp. 770-778. |
Nilvebrandt et al., “Detoxification of Lignocellulose Hydrolysates with Ion-Exchange Resins”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vols. 91-93, 2001, pp. 35-49. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,989, filed Mar. 3, 2010, Kwiatkowski. |
Abouzied et al., “Direct fermentation of potato starch to ethanol by cocultures of Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae”, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1986, 52(5):1055-9. |
Aden et al., “Lignocellulolsic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover”, NREL, NREL-TP-510-32438, 2002, pp. 1-88 and Appendices A-G. |
Aldrich, “New enzymes lower ethanol production fuel costs”, BridgeNews, Kansas City, 2004. |
Allison et al., “Transformation of the thermophilic fungus humicola grisea var. thermoidea and overproduction of humicola glucoamylase”, Curr Genet, 1992, 21:225-229. |
Argus Leader.Com., Web Page—Business—Broin Goes to Court, Printed Jun. 27, 2006, pp. 1-3. |
Ashikari et al., “rhizopus raw-starch-degrading glucoamylase: its cloning and expression in yeast”, Agric. Bio. Chem., 1986, 50(4):957-964. |
Bardini et al., “Continuous clarification of grape must by flotation,” Vini d'italia, 1992, 34(1):31-38, Abstract. |
Belya et al., “Composition of corn and distillers dried grains with solubles from dry grind ethanol processing”, Bioresource Technology, 2004, 94:293-298. |
Berven, “The Making of Broin Project”, Ethanol Producer Magazine, Feb. 2005, pp. 66-71. |
Biotimes: The enzyme e-zine, “Fuel Ethanol Products” (Jan. 2003). |
Biswas et al., “Analysis of Headspace Compounds of Distillers Grains using SPME in Conjunction with GC/MS and TGA”, Journal of Cereal Science, 2001, 33:223-229. |
Boel et al., “Glucoamylases G1 and G2 from Aspergillus niger are synthesized from two different but closely related mRNAs”, The EMBO Journal, 1984, 3(5):1097-1102. |
Bothast, “Ethanol research facility one of a kind,” Industrial Oil Products Article, 2004, 15(8):518-519. |
Brown et al., “The effect of temperature on the ehtanol tolerance of the yeast, Saccharomyces uvarum”, Biotechnology Letters, 1982, 4(4):269-274. |
Bryan, “Changing the Game”, Ethanol Producer Magazine, Aug. 2005, pp. 58-63. |
Casey et al., “Reevaluation of Alcohol Synthesis and Tolerance on Brewer's Yeast”, American Society of Brewing Chemists, Inc., 1985, 43(2):75-83. |
Chen et al., “Comparison of four different chemical pretreatments of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic digestibility.” Biomass and Bioenergy, 2009, 33:1381-1385. |
Chen et al., “Effect of replacing helical glycine residues with alanines on reversible and irreversible stability and production of Aspergillus awamori glucoamylase”, Protein Engineering, 1996, 9(6):499-505. |
Chi et al., “High-concentration alcoholic production from hydrolysate of raw ground corn by a tetraploid yeast strain”, Biotechnolgy Letters, 1993, 15(8):877-882. |
Civil Docket for Case No. 4:04-cv-04202-LLP printed Jun. 23, 2006. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 54: Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6); Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to FRCP 12(e) and Supporting Brief, by Genencor International, Inc., Entered: Feb. 14, 2005. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 61: Response to Motion regarding Docket No. 53, Motion for Discovery, Requiring Plaintiff to Specify Trade Secrets Prior to Commencement of Discovery and Supporting Brief, filed by Broin and Associates, Inc., Entered: Feb. 28, 2005. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 62: Reply to Motion Response regarding Docket No. 16, First Motion to Expedite Discovery and Supporting Brief, filed by Broin and Associates, Inc., Entered: Mar. 1, 2005. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 67: Reply to Motion Response regarding Docket No. 53, Motion for Discovery, Requiring Plaintiff to Specify Trade Secrets Prior to Commencement of Discovery and Supporting Brief, filed by Genencor International, Inc. Entered: Mar. 2, 2005. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 68: Form 35 Report of parties Planning Meeting and Scheduling Information, Entered: Mar. 3, 2005. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 77: Memorandum in Opposition regarding Docket No. 54, Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6); Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to FRCP 12(e) and Supporting Brief, filed by Broin and Associates, inc. Entered: Mar. 9, 2005. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 90: Response to Docket No. 87 Brief, Regarding Genencor's Objections to Broin's Identification of Trade Secrets, filed by Broin and Associates, inc., Entered: Apr. 11, 2005. |
District Court Civil Docket No. 95: Form 35 Report of Parties Planning Meeting and Scheduling information, Entered: Apr. 18, 2005. |
Dong et al., “The Neutral Detergent Fiber, Acid Detergent Fiber, Crude Fiber, and Lignin Contents of Distillers' Dried Grains with Solubles”, Journal of Food Science, 1987, 52(2):403-405. |
Donohoe et al., “Detecting cellulase penetration into corn stover cell walls by immuno-electron microscopy”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2009, 103(3):480-489. |
Elander et al., “Summary of findings from the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI): corn stover pretreatment”, Cellulose, 2009, 16:649-659. |
Fujio et al., “Alcohol Fermentation of Raw Cassava Starch by Rhizopus koji without cooking”, Biotechonolgy and Bioengineering, 1984, 26:315-319. |
Fujio et al., “Ethanol Fermentation of Raw Cassava Starch with Rhizopus koji in a Gas Circulation Type Fermentor”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1985, 27:1270-1273. |
GCOR Lantero patent application search USPTO site.May 17, 2005. |
Genencor Inventor Search, Oct. 3, 2005. |
Hamdy et al., “Effects of virginiamycin on fermentation rate by yeast”, Biomass and Bioenergy, 1996, 11(1):1-9. |
Hamelinck et al., “Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long term”, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 28:384-410. |
Han et al., “Saccharification and Ethanol Fermentation from Uncooked Starch Using Aspergillus niger koji”, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 1985, 17(4):258-264. |
Han et al., “Amylolysis of Raw Corn by Aspergillus niger for Simultaneous Ethanol Fermentation”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1987, 30:225-232. |
Hayashida et al., “High Concentration-Ethanol Fermantation of Raw Ground Corn”, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1982, 46(7):1947-1950. |
Hayashida et al., “Molecular cloning of Glucoamylase 1 Gene of Aspergillus awamori var. kawachi for Localization of the Raw-starch-affinity Site”, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1989, 53(4):923-929. |
Hayashida et al., “Raw Starch-digestive Glucoamulase Productivity of Protease-less Mutant from Asoergukkys awaniru var. kawachi”, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1981, 45(12):2675-2681. |
Islam et al., “Stability of virginiamycin and penicillin during alcohol fermentation”, Biomass and Bioenergy, 1999, 17: 369-376. |
Iwata et al. “Purification and Characterization of Rice α-glucosidase, a key enzyme for Alcohol Fermentation of Rice Polish”, Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2003, 95(1):106-108. |
Jacques et al., The Alcohol Textbook, 3rd Edition, A reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, Nottingham University Press 1999, Alltech Inc. 1999 (386 pages). |
Jacques et al., The Alcohol Textbook, 4th Edition, A reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries, Nottingham University Press 2003 Alltech Inc. 2003 (446 pages). |
Jensen et al., “Purification of extracellular amylolytic enzymes from the thermophilic fungus Thermomyces lanuginosus”, Can. J. Microbiol., 1988, 34:218-223. |
Jones, “review: Biological principles for the effects of ethanol”, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 1989, 11:130-153. |
Joutsjoki et al., “A Novel Glucoamylase Preparation for Grain Mash Saccharification”, Biotechnology Letters, 1993, 15(3):227-282. |
Kang et al., “Effect of Initiation Factor eIF-5A Depletion on Protein Synthesis and Proliferation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae”, J. Biol. Chem., 1994, 269(6):3934-3940. |
Knott et al., “Effects of the Nutrient Variability of Distiller's Solubles and Grains within Ethanol Plants and the Amount of Distiller's Solubles Blended with Distiller's Grains on Fat, Protein and Phosphorus Content of DDGS”, 2004. |
Knott et al., “Variation in Particle Size and Bulk Density of Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) Produced by “New Generation” Ethanol Plants in Minnesota and South Dakota”, 2004. |
Kuyper et al., “Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain”, FEMS Yeast Research, 2005, 5:925-934. |
Lang et al., “Recycle Bioreactor for Bioethanol Production from Wheat Starch II. Fermentation and Economics”, Energy Sources, 2001, 23:427-436. |
Makarov et al., “Quality improvement of table wines following continuous clarification treatments,” Kharachova Promislovist, 1976, Abstract only. |
Matsumoto et al., “Industrialization of a Noncooking System for Alcoholic Fermantation from Grains”, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1982, 46(6):1549-1558. |
Matsuoka et al., “Alcoholic Fermentation of Sweet Potato without Cooking”, J. Ferment. Technol., 1982, 60(6):599-602. |
McAloon et al., “Determining the Cost of Producing Ethanol from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks”, Technical Report NRELTP-580-28893, 2000, www.doe.gov/bridge. |
McLean et al., “Fluorometric Method for Measuring Yeast Metabolic Activity”, Technical Report, 2002, 3:5-25. |
McLean et al., “A Novel Method for Quantitation of Active Yeast Cells”, Technical Report, 2001, 2:1-5. |
Mikuni et al., “Alcohol Fermentation of Corn Starch Digested by Chalara paradoxa Amylase without Cooking”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1987, 29:729-732. |
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Ethanol Production in Minnesota. Air Quality/ General #1.20/ Oct. 2002, pp. 1-4. |
Morris et al., “AFM Images of Complexes between Amylose and Aspergillus niger Glucoamylase Mutants, Native and Mutant Starch Binding Domains: A Model for the Action of glucoamylase”, Starch/Starke, 2005, 57:1-7. |
Naidu et al., “Effects of Particle Size Reduction on Saccharification in Dry Grind Corn Processing”, Department of Agriculture of Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Poster Presentation 2002 or later. |
Narendranath et al., “Acetic Acid Lactic Acid Inhibition of Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiac b Different Mechanisms”, American Society of Brewing Chemists, Inc., 2001, 59(4):187-194. |
Narendranath et al., “Effect of yeast inoculation rate on the metabolism of contaminating lactobailli during fermentation of corn mash”, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2004, 31:581-584. |
Narendranath et al., “Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in minimal medium”, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2001, 26:171-177. |
Narendranath et al., “Effects of Lactobacilli on Yeast-Catalyzed Ethanol Fermentations”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 60(11):4158-4163. |
Narendranath et al., “Relationship between pH and Medium Dissolved Solids in Terms of Growth and Metabolism of Lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during Ethanol Production”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(5):2239-2243. |
Narendranath et al., “Urea Hydrogen Peroxide Reduces the Number of Laactobacilli, Nourishes Yeast, and Leaves No Residues in the Ethanol Fermentation”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(10):4187-4192. |
Narita et al., “Efficient Production of L-(+)-Lactic Acid from Raw Starch by Streptococcus bovis 148”, Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2004, 97(6):423-425. |
Neal St. Anthony, Columnists, “More profit, less waste from ethanol,” Star & Tribune, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Minnesota, Date Unknown. |
Porter et al., “Variability in Soy Flour Composition”, JAOCS, 2003, 80(6):557-562. |
Pourbafrani et al., “Production of biofuels, limonene and pectin from citrus wastes”, Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101:4246-4250. |
Rosentrater, “Understanding Distillers Grain Storage, Handling and Flowability Challenges”, Distillers Grain Quarterly, First Quarter 2006, pp. 18-21. |
Saha et al., “Raw Starch Absorption, Elution and Digestion Behavior of Glucoamylase of Rhizopus niveus”, J. Ferment. Technol., 1983, 61(1):67-72. |
Schnier et al., “Translation Initiation Factor 5A and its Hypusine Modification are Essential for Cell Viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae”, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1991, 11(6):3105-3114. |
Shibuya et al., “Molecular Cloning of the Glucoamylase Gene of Aspergillus shirousami and its Expression in Aspergillus oryzae”, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1990, 54(8):1905-1914. |
Shurson, “Overview of Swine Nutrition Research on the Value and Application of Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles Produced by Minnesota and South Dakota Ethanol Plants”, pp. 1-40 (Internet Mar. 2003). |
Shurson, “The Effect of Nutrient Variability of Corn on Estimated Nutrient Variability of DDGS” University of Minnesota, Date Unknown. |
Shurson, “The Value of High-Protein Distillers Coproducts in Swine Feeds”, Distillers Grains Quarterly, First Quarter 2006, pp. 22. |
Sigmund et al., “The Economics of Fair Play”, Scientific American, 2002, pp. 83-87. |
Singleton et al., Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, 1991. John Wiley and Sons. p. 964, col. I, II. 45-48. |
SpringerLink-Article, Web Page—Article—Natural Resources Research—“Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Enviornmental Impacts Are Negative”, Printed Jul. 5, 2005, pp. 1-2. |
Suresh et al., “Production of ethanol by raw starch hydrolysis and fermentation of damaged grains of wheat and sorghum”, Bioprocess Engineering, 1999, 21:165-168. |
Swanson, Company Spotlight, “Partnering in Progress”, Ethanol Producer Magazine, 2004, pp. 62-64, 66-68. |
Taylor et al., “Dry-Grind Process for Fuel Ethanol by Continuous Fermentation and Stripping”, American Chemical Society and American Institute of Chemical Engineers, accepted for publication Mar. 27, 2000, p. A-G. |
Taylor et al., “Some Properties of a Glucoamylase produced by the Thermophilic Fungus Humicola lanuginose”, Carbohydrate Research, 1978, 61:301-308. |
Thammarutwasik et al., “Alcoholic Fermentation of Sorghum Without Cooking”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1986, 28:1122-1125. |
The fuel of the future, Novozymes, May 2002. |
Thomas et al., “Fuel Alcohol Production: Effects of Free Amino Nitrogen on Fermentation of Very-High-Gravity Wheat Mashes”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1990, 56(7):2046-2050. |
Tosi et al., “Purification and characterization of an extracellular glucoamylase from the thermophilic fungus Humicola grisea var. thermoidea”, Can J. Microbiol., 1993, 39:846-852. |
Tritto, “2 grants, 6 clients boost yields at ethanol center”, St. Louis Business Journal, Nov. 26-Dec. 2, 2004. |
Ueda et al., “Alchoholic Fermentation of Raw Starch without Cooking by Using Back-koji Amylase”, J. Ferment. Technol., 1980, 58(3):237-242. |
Ueda et al., “Direct hydrolysis of raw starch”, Microbiological Sciences, 1984, 1(1):21-24. |
Ueda, “Ethanol Fermentation of Starch Materials without Cooking”, J. Jap. Soc. Starch Sci., 1982, 29(2):123-130, (English Abstract). |
Van Maris et al., “Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status”, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2006, 90:391-418. |
Van Uden et al., “Effects of ethanol on yeast performance; targets and underlying mechanisms”. European Brewery Convention, Proceedings of the 19th Congress, London 1983, pp. 137-144. |
Wang. “Argonne National Laboratory Ethanol Study: Key points.” Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewal Energy—U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 1-3, 2005. |
Weiss et al. “Distillers Grains”, eXtension, Last Updated May 12, 2009, pp. 1-6, Printed May 8, 2010. |
Weller et al., “Fuel Ethanol from Raw Corn by Aspergilli Hydrolysis with Concurrent Yeast Fermentation”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symp., 1983, 13:437-447. |
www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/31195.pdf. Biofuels News. vol. 4. No. 3. Fall 2001. |
Yue et al., “Functionality of resistant starch in food applications”, National Starch & Chemical (reprinted from Dec. 1998 issue of Food Australia) (1999). |
Zheng et al., “Enzymatic saccharification of dilute acid pretreated saline crops for fermentable sugar production”, Applied Energy, 2009, 86:2459-2465. |
Ziffer et al., “Temperature Effects in Ethanol Fermentation High Corn Media”, Biotechnology Letters, 1982, 4(12):809-814. |
De Mancilha, et al, “Evaluation of Ion Exchange Resins for Removal of Inhibitory Compounds from Corn Stover Hydrolyzate for Xylitol Fermentation,” Biotechnology Progress, (2003), 19:1837-1841. |
Gulati, et al., “Assessment of Ethanol Production Options for Corn Products,” Bioresource Technology, (1996), 58:253-264. |
Jeffries, T.W., et al., Fermentation of Hemicellulosic Sugars and Sugar Mixtures by Candida shehatae, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 31:502-506 (1988). |
Maier, et al., “Low-Temperature Drying of the 1992 Indiana Corn Crop,” Grain Quality Fact Sheet #5. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, West Lafayette, Indiana, (1992), pp. 1-8, http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/GQ/GQ-5.HTML. |
Nigam, et al., “Enzyme and microbial systems involved in starch processing,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, (1995), 17:770-778. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,948, filed Jun. 2010, Bootsma et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/828,028, filed Jun. 2010, Bootsma et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/209,170, filed Aug. 2011, Bly et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/798,617, filed Mar. 2013, Narendranath. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,364, filed Mar. 2013, Narendranath et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/980,255, filed Jul. 2013, Narendranath et al. |
U.S. appl. No. 14/130,878, filed Jan. 2014, McDonald et al. |
Adney, B. et al., “Measurement of Cellulase Activities”, Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42628 (2008) Cover; p. 1-8. |
Caparros, S. et al., “Xylooligosaccharides Production from Arundo donax”, J. Agric. Food Chem. 55 (2007): p. 5536-5543. |
Cort, J. et al., “Minimize Scale-Up Risk”, www.aiche.org/cep, (2010): p. 39-49. |
Demain, A.L. et al., “Cellulose, Clostridia, and Ethanol”, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 69(1) (2005): p. 124-154. |
Dien, B.S. et al., “Enzyme characterization for hydrolysis of AFEX and liquid hot-water pretreated distillers' grains and their conversion to ethanol”, Bioresource Technology 99 (2008): p. 5216-5225. |
Gibbons, W.R. et al., “Fuel Ethanol and High Protein Feed from Corn and Corn-Whey Mixtures in a Farm-Scale Plant”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering XXV (1983): p. 2127-2148. |
Goodman, B. J., “FY 1988 Ethanol from Biomass Annual Report” (1989): p. 1-458. |
Grohmann, K. et al., “Optimization of Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Biomass”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symp. 15 (1985): p. 59-80. |
Grohmann, K. et al., “Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Biomass at High Solids Concentrations”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symp. 17 (1986): p. 135-151. |
Humbird, D. et al., “Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2011): Covers with Introduction; p. 1-114. |
Jeoh, T. “Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Cotton Gin Waste for Fuel Ethanol Production”, Thesis submitted to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (1998): Cover with Introduction; p. 1-138. |
Jorgensen, H. et al., “Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities”, Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref 1 (2001): p. 119-134. |
Kumar, R. et al., “Effect of Enzyme Supplementation at Moderate Cellulase Loadings on Initial Glucose and Xylose Release from Corn Stover Solids Pretreated by Leading Technologies”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 102(2) (2009); p. 457-467. |
Larsen, J. et al., “The IBUS Process—Lignocellulosic Bioethanol Close to a Commercial Reality”, Chem. Eng. Technol. 31(5) (2008): p. 765-772. |
Lynd, L.R. et al. “Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update”, Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16 (2005): p. 577-583. |
Mosier, N. et at, “Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass”, Bioresource Technology 96 (2005): p. 673-686. |
McMillan, J.D. “Processes for Pretreating Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (1992): Covers with Introduction; p. 1-44. |
Nandini, C. et al. “Carbohydrate composition of wheat, wheat bran, sorghum and bajra with good chapatti/roti (Indian flat bread) making quality”, Food Chemistry 73 (2001): p. 197-203. |
Sanchez, O.J. et al., “Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks”, Bioresource Technology 99 (2008): p. 5270-5295. |
Saska, M. et al., “Aqueous Extraction of Sugarcane Bagasse Hemicellulose and Production of Xylose Syrup”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 45 (1995): p. 517-523. |
Sepulveda-Huerta, E. et al. “Production of detoxified sorghum straw hydrolysates for fermentative purposes”, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86 (2006): p. 2579-2586. |
Spindler, D. et al., “Evaluation of Pretreated Woody Crops for the Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Process”, Ethanol from Biomass. FY 1988, Annual Report (1989): p. B33-B43. |
Taherzadeh, M.J. et al., “Acid-based Hydrolysis Processes for Ethanol from Lignocellulosic Materials: A Review”, BioResources 2(3) (2007): p. 472-499. |
Taherzadeh, M.J. et al., “Enzyme-based Hydrolysis Processes for Ethanol from Lignocellulosic Materials: A Review”, BioResources 2(4) (2007): p. 707-738. |
Texeira, R.H. et al., “Ethanol Annual Report FY 1990”, (1991): p. 1-346. |
Torget, R. et al., “Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Short Rotation Woody and Herbaceous Crops”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 24/25 (1990): p. 115-126. |
Torget, R. et al., “Initial Design of a Dilute Sulfuric Acid Pretreatment Process for Aspen Wood Chips”, Solar Energy Research Institute (1988): p. 89-104. |
Torget, R. et al., “Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Corn Cobs, Corn Stover, and Short-Rotation Crops”, FY 1990 Ethanol Annual Report (1991): p. 71-81. |
Weil, J. et al., “Pretreatment of Corn Fiber by Pressure Cooking in Water”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 73 (1998): p. 1-17. |
Wyman, Charles E., “What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol”, Trends in Biotechnology 25(4) (2007): p. 153-157. |
Wyman, C.E. et al., “Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies”, Bioresource Technology 96 (2005): p. 1959-1966. |
Yang, B. et al., “Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol”, Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. 2 (2008): p. 26-40. |
Zhang, Y-H.P. et al., “Outlook for cellulose improvement: Screening and selection strategies”, Biotechnology Advances 24 (2006): p. 452-481. |
Zhang, Y.P. et al., “Toward an Aggregated Understanding of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Noncomplexed Cellulase Systems”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering 88(7) (2004): p. 797-824. |
Bellissimi, Eleonora et al., Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain, FEMS Yeast Res 9 (2009): 358-364. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100227369 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61157140 | Mar 2009 | US | |
61157142 | Mar 2009 | US | |
61157137 | Mar 2009 | US |